封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1776708

2032 年食品追溯区块链市场预测:按组件、供应商、食品产品、相关人员、部署模式、最终用户和地区进行全球分析

Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Forecasts to 2032 - Global Analysis By Component, Provider, Food, Stakeholders, Deployment Mode, End User and By Geography

出版日期: | 出版商: Stratistics Market Research Consulting | 英文 200+ Pages | 商品交期: 2-3个工作天内

价格

根据 Stratistics MRC 的数据,全球食品追溯区块链市场预计在 2025 年将达到 17.5 亿美元,到 2032 年将达到 210.3 亿美元,预测期内的复合年增长率为 42.6%。

食品溯源中的区块链技术是指利用分散式帐本技术记录、验证和共用食品供应链上的资料。该技术可以即时追踪食品从产地到加工、分销和销售的每个环节,确保记录的不可篡改、安全性和透明度。每一次移动或交易都带有时间戳,并与先前的交易关联,从而建立不可篡改的产品历史记录。这可以提高食品安全性,减少欺诈,增强消费者信心,并有助于快速检测污染源。区块链为相关人员提供值得信赖的单一资讯来源,促进有效召回和食品法规合规。

对食品安全和透明度的需求日益增加

消费者要求对食品的来源、品质和加工过程提供更多保障。区块链透过实现数据不可篡改和即时追踪,确保整个供应链的课责。一旦发生食物中毒事件,区块链技术能够快速识别污染源,从而增强消费者、製造商和经销商的信心。因此,企业正在迅速采用区块链技术来满足客户需求和法律要求。

实施和营运成本高

建立区块链基础设施需要在软体、硬体和高素质人才方面投入大量资金。中小企业通常难以承担这些前期成本。能源消耗、系统升级和持续维护增加了营运负担。这些高昂的费用阻碍了企业放弃现有流程。因此,市场成长放缓,可扩充性下降。

与物联网和智慧感测器集成

这些技术确保了温度、湿度和位置的精准监控,从而提高了透明度和产品品质。感测器数据与区块链相结合,使其变得检验且不可解释,从而增强了相关人员的信任。物联网设备的自动资料输入减少了业务效率低下和人为错误。这种整合可以更快地识别污染源,从而减少召回和健康风险。总体而言,它促进了食品安全法规的合规性,并提高了供应链的责任感。

缺乏跨区域监管标准化

企业在适应各种法律体制面临挑战,导致采用速度放缓。当多个地区遵循不同的资料格式和合规标准时,可能会出现互通性问题。这阻碍了全球供应链的透明度,并限制了跨境食品追溯。为每个国家客製化区块链解决方案会为企业带来更高的成本。整体而言,由于法规环境分散,食品追溯领域的区块链市场扩充性和可靠性较低。

COVID-19的影响

新冠疫情显着加速了区块链在食品追溯领域的应用。供应链中断以及人们对食品安全和透明度日益增长的担忧,促使相关人员寻求可靠的即时追踪解决方案。区块链有助于提高可见性,并降低污染和诈欺风险。消费者对可追溯且符合道德标准的产品的需求日益增长,也推动了对区块链平台的投资。儘管最初采用区块链的门槛很高,但疫情最终凸显了区块链在建立具有韧性和透明度的食品供应链方面的价值。

预计中间件供应商细分市场在预测期内将占据最大份额

预计中间件供应商细分市场将在预测期内占据最大市场占有率,因为它们能够实现区块链平台与现有食品供应链系统的无缝整合。这些提供者提供的工具有助于促进资料交换、智慧合约部署和流程自动化。这些解决方案有助于缓解农民、加工商和零售商等不同相关人员之间的互通性问题。透过确保安全即时的资料共用,中间件提高了透明度和可追溯性。这反过来又能建立消费者信任,并鼓励区块链在食品追溯领域中得到更广泛的应用。

预计在预测期内,谷物和谷类产品部门的复合年增长率最高。

由于整个供应链的透明度,谷物和谷类产品预计将在预测期内实现最高成长率。区块链有助于追踪谷物的来源、品质和流动情况,从而降低诈欺和污染的风险。区块链支持农民、加工商和零售商之间即时共用数据,增强信任和课责。种植方法和物流的不可篡改记录有助于遵守法规。这将增强消费者对谷物产品的信心,并促进市场采用。

占比最大的地区:

由于人们对食品安全的担忧日益加剧,以及中国、印度和日本等国政府主导的倡议,预计亚太地区将在预测期内占据最大的市场占有率。消费者意识的提升、对透明度的需求以及食品出口的成长正在推动市场发展。新兴企业和科技公司正在与农业供应链合作,以改善从农场到餐桌的全程追踪。技术进步和大规模先导计画进一步推动了该地区的成长,尤其是在水产品、乳製品和生鲜食品领域,使该地区成为快速发展的区块链可追溯性中心。

复合年增长率最高的地区:

在预测期内,北美预计将呈现最高的复合年增长率,这得益于其严格的食品安全法规、成熟的技术基础设施以及沃尔玛和IBM Food Trust倡议等大型零售商的早期采用。美国在该地区处于领先地位,其重点是改善食源性疾病预防和召回管理。与亚太地区不同,该地区市场的特点是企业成熟、数位整合程度高,消费者对符合道德标准的食品有广泛的需求。高额的研发投入、对可扩展性的追求以及肉类和家禽可追溯性方面的成功试验,进一步巩固了该地区的市场主导地位。

提供免费客製化:

订阅此报告的客户可享有以下免费自订选项之一:

  • 公司简介
    • 对最多三家其他市场公司进行全面分析
    • 主要企业的SWOT分析(最多3家公司)
  • 区域细分
    • 根据客户兴趣对主要国家市场进行估计、预测和复合年增长率(註:基于可行性检查)
  • 竞争基准化分析
    • 根据产品系列、地理分布和策略联盟对主要企业基准化分析

目录

第一章执行摘要

第二章 前言

  • 概述
  • 相关利益者
  • 调查范围
  • 调查方法
    • 资料探勘
    • 数据分析
    • 数据检验
    • 研究途径
  • 研究材料
    • 主要研究资料
    • 次级研究资讯来源
    • 先决条件

第三章市场走势分析

  • 驱动程式
  • 抑制因素
  • 机会
  • 威胁
  • 最终用户分析
  • 新兴市场
  • COVID-19的影响

第四章 波特五力分析

  • 供应商的议价能力
  • 买家的议价能力
  • 替代品的威胁
  • 新进入者的威胁
  • 竞争对手之间的竞争

5. 全球食品追溯区块链市场(按组件)

  • 平台
  • 服务

6. 全球食品追溯区块链市场(依提供者)

  • 中介软体提供者
  • 基础设施提供者
  • 应用程式提供者

7. 全球食品追溯区块链市场(依食品类别)

  • 乳製品
  • 肉类和鱼贝类
  • 水果和蔬菜
  • 饮料
  • 粮食
  • 加工食品
  • 其他食物

8. 全球食品追溯区块链市场相关人员

  • 生产者和农民
  • 食品製造商
  • 物流和配送
  • 零售商
  • 监管机构
  • 消费者
  • 其他相关人员

9. 全球食品追溯区块链市场(依部署模式)

  • 本地
  • 云端基础

10. 全球食品追溯区块链市场(依最终用户)

  • 批发的
  • 饭店业
  • 政府机构
  • 电商平台
  • 其他最终用户

第 11 章。按地区分類的全球食品追溯区块链市场

  • 北美洲
    • 美国
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 欧洲
    • 德国
    • 英国
    • 义大利
    • 法国
    • 西班牙
    • 其他欧洲国家
  • 亚太地区
    • 日本
    • 中国
    • 印度
    • 澳洲
    • 纽西兰
    • 韩国
    • 其他亚太地区
  • 南美洲
    • 阿根廷
    • 巴西
    • 智利
    • 南美洲其他地区
  • 中东和非洲
    • 沙乌地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公国
    • 卡达
    • 南非
    • 其他中东和非洲地区

第十二章 重大进展

  • 协议、伙伴关係、合作和合资企业
  • 收购与合併
  • 新产品发布
  • 业务扩展
  • 其他关键策略

第十三章 公司概况

  • IBM Corporation
  • Microsoft Corporation
  • SAP SE
  • Oracle Corporation
  • Ambrosus
  • Provenance Ltd.
  • TE-FOOD International GmbH
  • Ripe.io
  • OriginTrail
  • ZhongAn Technology
  • VeChain Foundation
  • Arc-net
  • Atea ASA
  • BlockApps Inc.
  • AgriDigital
  • Chainvine
  • FoodLogiQ
Product Code: SMRC30039

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market is accounted for $1.75 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $21.03 billion by 2032 growing at a CAGR of 42.6% during the forecast period. Blockchain in food traceability is the process of recording, confirming, and sharing data along the food supply chain using distributed ledger technology. It makes it possible to trace food goods in real time from the point of origin through the steps of processing, distribution, and sale, guaranteeing record immutability, security, and transparency. Every movement or transaction is time-stamped and connected to the one before it, establishing an unchangeable record of the product's history. This improves food safety, lowers fraud, increases consumer trust, and aids in the prompt detection of contamination sources. Blockchain offers a single, trustworthy source of truth for all parties involved, facilitating effective recalls and adherence to food rules.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Rising demand for food safety and transparency

Customers are looking for more guarantees regarding the provenance, quality, and preparation of their food. Blockchain ensures accountability throughout the supply chain by enabling immutable data and real-time tracking. During outbreaks of food borne illness, it facilitates the prompt identification of contamination sources. Customers, manufacturers, and merchants all gain trust as a result. Because of this, companies are quickly implementing blockchain to satisfy customer demands and legal requirements.

Restraint:

High implementation and operational costs

It takes a significant investment in software, hardware, and qualified staff to set up blockchain infrastructure. Small and medium-sized businesses frequently find it difficult to pay for these up-front costs. The operational strain is increased by energy use, system upgrades, and ongoing maintenance. Businesses are discouraged from abandoning established processes by these exorbitant expenses. The market grows more slowly and has less scalability as a result.

Opportunity:

Integration with IoT and smart sensors

Transparency and product quality are increased by these technologies, which guarantee precise temperature, humidity, and location monitoring. Sensor data becomes verifiable and impenetrable when paired with blockchain, increasing stakeholder trust. Operational inefficiencies and human error are decreased by automated data entry from IoT devices. This integration reduces recalls and health hazards by enabling speedier identification of contaminated sources. In general, it promotes adherence to food safety laws and increases supply chain responsibility.

Threat:

Lack of regulatory standardization across regions

Adoption rates are slowed by businesses' challenges in conforming to various legal frameworks. When several regions adhere to disparate data formats and compliance standards, interoperability issues might occur. This hinders the transparency of the global supply chain and restricts the traceability of food across borders. Customising blockchain solutions for each country comes at a larger cost to businesses. In general, the market for blockchain-based food traceability is less scalable and trustworthy due to the fragmented regulatory environment.

Covid-19 Impact

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly accelerated the adoption of blockchain in the food traceability market. Supply chain disruptions and rising concerns about food safety and transparency prompted stakeholders to seek reliable, real-time tracking solutions. Blockchain provided enhanced visibility, helping mitigate risks of contamination and fraud. Increased consumer demand for traceable and ethically sourced products also fueled investment in blockchain platforms. Despite initial implementation hurdles, the pandemic ultimately highlighted blockchain's value in building resilient and transparent food supply chains.

The middleware providers segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The middleware providers segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period by enabling seamless integration between blockchain platforms and existing food supply chain systems. These providers offer tools that facilitate data exchange, smart contract deployment, and process automation. Their solutions help reduce interoperability issues across different stakeholders like farmers, processors, and retailers. By ensuring secure and real-time data sharing, middleware enhances transparency and traceability. This, in turn, builds consumer trust and encourages broader adoption of blockchain in food traceability.

The grains & cereals segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

Over the forecast period, the grains & cereals segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate, due to the transparency across the entire supply chain. It helps track the origin, quality, and movement of grains, reducing fraud and contamination risks. Blockchain enables real-time data sharing among farmers, processors, and retailers, enhancing trust and accountability. Regulatory compliance becomes easier with immutable records of cultivation practices and logistics. This increases consumer confidence in grain-based products, driving market adoption.

Region with largest share:

During the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is expected to hold the largest market share due to increasing concerns over food safety and government-led initiatives in countries like China, India, and Japan. Rising consumer awareness, demand for transparency, and expanding food exports drive the market. Start-ups and tech firms are collaborating with agricultural supply chains to improve tracking from farm to fork. Technological advancements and large-scale pilot projects are further accelerating growth, particularly in seafood, dairy, and fresh produce segments, positioning the region as a fast-growing blockchain traceability hub.

Region with highest CAGR:

Over the forecast period, the North America region is anticipated to exhibit the highest CAGR by stringent food safety regulations, established tech infrastructure, and early adoption by major retailers like Walmart and IBM's Food Trust initiative. The U.S. leads the region, focusing on preventing foodborne illnesses and improving recall management. Unlike Asia Pacific, the market here is characterized by mature players, extensive digital integration, and widespread consumer demand for ethically sourced food. High investment in research, scalability efforts, and pilot success in meat and poultry traceability further contribute to the region's market dominance.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players profiled in the Blockchain in Food Traceability Market include IBM Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, SAP SE, Oracle Corporation, Ambrosus, Provenance Ltd., TE-FOOD International GmbH, Ripe.io, OriginTrail, ZhongAn Technology, VeChain Foundation, Arc-net, Atea ASA, BlockApps Inc., AgriDigital, Chainvine and FoodLogiQ.

Key Developments:

In February 2025, IBM and iFoodDS launched the iFoodDS Trace Exchange with IBM Food Trust, a joint solution designed to help food companies meet the stringent requirements of the U.S. FDA's FSMA Rule 204(d) on traceability. IBM provides backend data processing and blockchain infrastructure, while iFoodDS offers applications and onboarding support. This partnership enables secure, scalable, and swift traceability, making regulatory compliance more accessible and improving food safety across the supply chain.

In October 2024, Microsoft enhanced Dynamics 365 Business Central with blockchain integration, allowing real-time, tamper-proof tracking of food products from origin to consumer. This supports verification of product authenticity and compliance with ethical sourcing standards.

In June 2024, SAP SE partnered with Unilever to pilot the GreenToken by SAP solution, enhancing traceability and transparency in Unilever's global palm oil supply chain. The pilot in Indonesia tracked over 188,000 tons of oil palm fruit, using blockchain tokens to mirror material flow and capture origin attributes. This initiative supports Unilever's goal of a deforestation-free supply chain and demonstrates SAP's commitment to sustainable sourcing.

Components Covered:

  • Platform
  • Services

Providers Covered:

  • Middleware Providers
  • Infrastructure Providers
  • Application Providers

Foods Covered:

  • Dairy Products
  • Meat and Seafood
  • Fruits & Vegetables
  • Beverages
  • Grains & Cereals
  • Processed Foods
  • Other Foods

Stakeholders Covered:

  • Growers and Farmers
  • Food Manufacturers
  • Logistics and Distribution
  • Retailers
  • Regulatory Bodies
  • Consumers
  • Other Stakeholders

Deployment Modes Covered:

  • On-Premise
  • Cloud-Based

End Users Covered:

  • Wholesale
  • Hospitality
  • Government Agencies
  • E-commerce Platforms
  • Other End Users

Regions Covered:

  • North America
    • US
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • Italy
    • France
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • Japan
    • China
    • India
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • South America
    • Argentina
    • Brazil
    • Chile
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle East & Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • Qatar
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:

  • Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
  • Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
  • Covers Market data for the years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2028, and 2032
  • Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
  • Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
  • Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
  • Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
  • Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

  • Company Profiling
    • Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
    • SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
  • Regional Segmentation
    • Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
  • Competitive Benchmarking
    • Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

  • 2.1 Abstract
  • 2.2 Stake Holders
  • 2.3 Research Scope
  • 2.4 Research Methodology
    • 2.4.1 Data Mining
    • 2.4.2 Data Analysis
    • 2.4.3 Data Validation
    • 2.4.4 Research Approach
  • 2.5 Research Sources
    • 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
    • 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
    • 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis

  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Drivers
  • 3.3 Restraints
  • 3.4 Opportunities
  • 3.5 Threats
  • 3.6 End User Analysis
  • 3.7 Emerging Markets
  • 3.8 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

  • 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
  • 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
  • 4.3 Threat of substitutes
  • 4.4 Threat of new entrants
  • 4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market, By Component

  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Platform
  • 5.3 Services

6 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market, By Provider

  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2 Middleware Providers
  • 6.3 Infrastructure Providers
  • 6.4 Application Providers

7 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market, By Food

  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 Dairy Products
  • 7.3 Meat and Seafood
  • 7.4 Fruits & Vegetables
  • 7.5 Beverages
  • 7.6 Grains & Cereals
  • 7.7 Processed Foods
  • 7.8 Other Foods

8 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market, By Stakeholders

  • 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.2 Growers and Farmers
  • 8.3 Food Manufacturers
  • 8.4 Logistics and Distribution
  • 8.5 Retailers
  • 8.6 Regulatory Bodies
  • 8.7 Consumers
  • 8.8 Other Stakeholders

9 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market, By Deployment Mode

  • 9.1 Introduction
  • 9.2 On-Premise
  • 9.3 Cloud-Based

10 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market, By End User

  • 10.1 Introduction
  • 10.2 Wholesale
  • 10.3 Hospitality
  • 10.4 Government Agencies
  • 10.5 E-commerce Platforms
  • 10.6 Other End Users

11 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market, By Geography

  • 11.1 Introduction
  • 11.2 North America
    • 11.2.1 US
    • 11.2.2 Canada
    • 11.2.3 Mexico
  • 11.3 Europe
    • 11.3.1 Germany
    • 11.3.2 UK
    • 11.3.3 Italy
    • 11.3.4 France
    • 11.3.5 Spain
    • 11.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 11.4 Asia Pacific
    • 11.4.1 Japan
    • 11.4.2 China
    • 11.4.3 India
    • 11.4.4 Australia
    • 11.4.5 New Zealand
    • 11.4.6 South Korea
    • 11.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
  • 11.5 South America
    • 11.5.1 Argentina
    • 11.5.2 Brazil
    • 11.5.3 Chile
    • 11.5.4 Rest of South America
  • 11.6 Middle East & Africa
    • 11.6.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 11.6.2 UAE
    • 11.6.3 Qatar
    • 11.6.4 South Africa
    • 11.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

12 Key Developments

  • 12.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
  • 12.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
  • 12.3 New Product Launch
  • 12.4 Expansions
  • 12.5 Other Key Strategies

13 Company Profiling

  • 13.1 IBM Corporation
  • 13.2 Microsoft Corporation
  • 13.3 SAP SE
  • 13.4 Oracle Corporation
  • 13.5 Ambrosus
  • 13.6 Provenance Ltd.
  • 13.7 TE-FOOD International GmbH
  • 13.8 Ripe.io
  • 13.9 OriginTrail
  • 13.10 ZhongAn Technology
  • 13.11 VeChain Foundation
  • 13.12 Arc-net
  • 13.13 Atea ASA
  • 13.14 BlockApps Inc.
  • 13.15 AgriDigital
  • 13.16 Chainvine
  • 13.17 FoodLogiQ

List of Tables

  • Table 1 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Region (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 2 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Component (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 3 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Platform (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 4 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Services (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 5 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Provider (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 6 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Middleware Providers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 7 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Infrastructure Providers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 8 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Application Providers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 9 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Food (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 10 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Dairy Products (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 11 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Meat and Seafood (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 12 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Fruits & Vegetables (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 13 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Beverages (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 14 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Grains & Cereals (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 15 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Processed Foods (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 16 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Other Foods (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 17 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Stakeholders (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 18 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Growers and Farmers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 19 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Food Manufacturers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 20 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Logistics and Distribution (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 21 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Retailers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 22 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Regulatory Bodies (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 23 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Consumers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 24 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Other Stakeholders (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 25 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Deployment Mode (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 26 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By On-Premise (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 27 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Cloud-Based (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 28 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By End User (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 29 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Wholesale (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 30 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Hospitality (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 31 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Government Agencies (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 32 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By E-commerce Platforms (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 33 Global Blockchain in Food Traceability Market Outlook, By Other End Users (2024-2032) ($MN)

Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.