查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1797890

全球生物作物保护市场：2032 年预测 - 按产品类型、种类、形式、来源、作物类型、应用和地区进行分析

Biological Crop Protection Market Forecasts to 2032 - Global Analysis By Product Type (Microbial Pesticides, Plant-Incorporated Protectants and Biochemical Pesticides), Type, Form, Source, Crop Type, Application and By Geography
出版日期: | 出版商: Stratistics Market Research Consulting | 英文 200+ Pages | 商品交期: 2-3个工作天内

价格

根据 Stratistics MRC 的数据，全球生物作物保护市场预计在 2025 年达到 85.4 亿美元，到 2032 年将达到 234.2 亿美元，预测期内的复合年增长率为 15.5%。

生物作物保护是指利用天然物质和生物体来控制农业中的杂草、害虫和疾病，从而减少对化学农药的依赖，并提高作物的健康水平。此策略使用天然植物抽取物、细菌和真菌等微生物製剂以及寄生蜂和瓢虫等有益昆虫。此外，生物作物保护透过增加生物多样性并与自然生态系统协同作用，减少对环境的影响，并促进永续的农业实践。综合虫害管理 (IPM) 系统对于农民在生产更安全的食品的同时维护土壤和环境健康至关重要。

根据联合国粮食及农业组织 (FAO) 统计，全球每年因病虫害而损失的农作物产量高达 40%，凸显了迫切需要采取永续的病虫害管理方法，包括生物作物保护，以加强粮食安全和环境復原力。

消费者对高品质、无残留食品的兴趣日益浓厚

现代消费者日益增强的环保和健康意识，推动了对永续生产、有机种植和无残留食品的需求。人们对水果、蔬菜和谷物中农药残留的担忧日益加剧，尤其是在大城市和出口导向市场。因此，农民面临着在满足这些期望的同时保持生产力的压力。生物农作物保护产品对人体安全无毒，随着清洁标籤食品运动的兴起，它们也越来越受欢迎。此外，消费者偏好的转变迫使农民投资生物农药，放弃合成化学农药，以维护消费者信任并进入高端市场。

环境敏感性和可变有效性

生物农作物保护产品在不同田间环境下的有效性差异是其最大的缺点之一。生物製药对温度、湿度、土壤pH值、紫外线照射和施用时间等环境变数敏感。生物农药中使用的许多微生物在不利的环境中难以生存和定殖，尤其是在干燥或恶劣的气候条件下。此外，生物防治通常起效缓慢，害虫族群的建立和根除需要时间。

有利的政府法规和支持

世界各国政府越来越认识到生物解决方案在维护环境保护、粮食安全和稳定农业收入的重要性。许多国家已经实施了激励措施、补贴和政策变化，以鼓励永续的投入。欧盟的「绿色新政」和「从农场到餐桌」策略旨在到2030年将化学农药使用量减少50%，这将直接惠及生物方法。巴西的国家生物投入计画加快了生物投入的核准，印度则为有机投入套件提供补贴。此外，这些政策变化创造的有利条件使製造商能够扩大业务，进入新市场并投资研发。

来自人工农药的激烈竞争

儘管环境和监管压力日益增大，合成农药凭藉其频谱活性、快速起效的特性以及成熟的供应链，仍占据全球作物保护市场的主导地位。化学农药通常比生物製药更便宜、更容易使用，且所需的技术知识更少。此外，许多需要确保作物保护的农民仍依赖大型农化公司大力推广的合成化学物质。在监管薄弱或执法不力的市场中，合成农药通常因其便利性和熟悉性而比生物製药更具优势。

COVID-19的影响：

新冠疫情对生物作物保护市场造成了多方面的影响。短期供应链中断和关闭导致生物製药的生产、分销和使用变得困难，尤其是在依赖进口微生物菌株和製剂的地区。监管延迟和劳动力流动性受限也导致研发、产品註册和田间试验的延迟。然而，疫情提高了全球对食品安全、健康和永续农业的认识，激发了人们对无残留和环保作物保护技术的兴趣。由于危机凸显了建立具有韧性的本地农业系统的重要性，因此有必要对包括生物製药在内的永续投入提供政策支持并进行新的投资。

微生物农药市场预计将在预测期内成为最大的市场

预计微生物农药领域将在预测期内占据最大的市场占有率。天然存在的微生物，包括细菌、真菌、病毒和原生动物，是微生物农药的来源。这些药剂，例如木霉菌和苏力菌(BT)，用于针对特定的害虫和植物疾病，同时对环境、人类和非标靶生物保持安全。由于主要农业地区的监管支持以及它们与有机农业和综合虫害管理 (IPM) 实践的兼容性，微生物农药的普及度日益提升。微生物农药是生物作物保护产业中应用最广泛、经济效益最高的领域，其稳定性和功效随着製剂和施用技术的不断创新而不断提升。

生物杀菌剂领域预计将在预测期内实现最高的复合年增长率

生物杀菌剂领域预计将在预测期内实现最高成长率。生物杀菌剂主要含有有益微生物，例如木霉、枯草桿菌和萤光萤光，它们针对的是导致作物病害（例如霜霉病、白粉病和枯萎病）的真菌病原体。气候变迁相关的真菌爆发、化学杀菌剂抗药性的日益增长以及消费者对有机蔬菜和水果的需求不断增长，都是生物杀菌剂爆炸式增长的因素。生物杀菌剂具有抑制病害和促进土壤健康的双重作用，使其在永续农业和综合虫害管理 (IPM) 实践中广受欢迎。

比最大的地区

预计北美将在预测期内占据最大的市场占有率，这主要得益于美国，美国在使用生物解决方案（包括生物农药）方面处于领先地位。成熟的有机农业实践、美国环保署 (EPA) 等组织执行的严格农药法规以及消费者对永续、无农药残留农产品的高需求是支持该地区占据主导地位的关键因素。强大的研发基础设施、微生物产品的早期商业化以及新兴企业和大型农业相关企业的积极参与进一步加强了北美的市场渗透率。精密农业的技术进步、综合虫害管理 (IPM) 计画的快速成长以及政府的支持政策正在进一步加强市场渗透率。

复合年增长率最高的地区：

预计亚太地区在预测期内的复合年增长率最高。有机食品需求的不断增长、永续农业意识的不断增强以及政府支持环保农业的项目是这一快速扩张的主要驱动力。中国、越南和印度等国家正透过补贴、有机农业计画和无农药残留出口限制等方式积极推广生物投入品的使用。该地区面临的土壤劣化和合成农药过度使用等严峻挑战也推动了向生物替代品的转变。受人口成长、农业活动增加以及法律规范完善的推动，生物製药。

免费客製化服务

此报告的订阅者可以从以下免费自订选项中选择一项：

  • 公司简介
    • 对最多三家其他公司进行全面分析
    • 主要企业的SWOT分析（最多3家公司）
  • 区域分类
    • 根据客户兴趣对主要国家进行的市场估计、预测和复合年增长率（註：基于可行性检查）
  • 竞争基准化分析
    • 根据产品系列、地理分布和策略联盟对主要企业基准化分析

目录

第一章执行摘要

第 2 章 简介

  • 概述
  • 相关利益者
  • 分析范围
  • 分析方法
    • 资料探勘
    • 数据分析
    • 数据检验
    • 分析方法
  • 分析材料
    • 主要研究资料
    • 二手研究资讯来源
    • 先决条件

第三章市场走势分析

  • 介绍
  • 驱动程式
  • 抑制因素
  • 市场机会
  • 威胁
  • 产品分析
  • 应用分析
  • 新兴市场
  • COVID-19的感染疾病

第四章 波特五力分析

  • 供应商的议价能力
  • 买方议价能力
  • 替代产品的威胁
  • 新参与企业的威胁
  • 企业之间的竞争

5. 全球生物作物保护市场（依产品类型）

  • 微生物农药
  • 植物内含保护剂（PIPs）
  • 生化农药

6. 全球生物作物保护市场（按类型）

  • 生物杀虫剂
  • 生物杀菌剂
  • 生物杀线虫剂
  • 其他类型

7. 全球生物作物保护市场（按类型）

  • 液体
  • 粉末
  • 颗粒

8. 全球生物作物保护市场（依来源）

  • 天然微生物
  • 生物来源

9. 全球生物作物保护市场（依作物类型）

  • 粮食
  • 油籽/豆类
  • 水果和蔬菜
  • 其他作物

第十章全球生物作物保护市场（按应用）

  • 叶面喷布
  • 种子处理
  • 土壤处理
  • 其他用途

第 11 章。全球生物作物保护市场（按地区）

  • 北美洲
    • 美国
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 欧洲
    • 德国
    • 英国
    • 义大利
    • 法国
    • 西班牙
    • 其他欧洲国家
  • 亚太地区
    • 日本
    • 中国
    • 印度
    • 澳洲
    • 纽西兰
    • 韩国
    • 其他亚太地区
  • 南美洲
    • 阿根廷
    • 巴西
    • 智利
    • 南美洲其他地区
  • 中东和非洲
    • 沙乌地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公国
    • 卡达
    • 南非
    • 其他中东和非洲地区

第十二章：主要趋势

  • 合约、商业伙伴关係和合资企业
  • 企业合併与收购（M&A）
  • 新产品发布
  • 业务扩展
  • 其他关键策略

第十三章：公司简介

  • Bayer AG
  • Syngenta AG
  • Novozymes A/S
  • Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.
  • BASF SE
  • FMC Corporation
  • Corteva Agriscience
  • Adama Ltd.
  • BioWorks, Inc
  • Seipasa SA
  • Nufarm Limited
  • Andermatt Biocontrol AG
  • Valent BioSciences Corporation
  • Marrone Bio Innovations Inc.
  • BioSafe Systems LLC
Product Code: SMRC30260

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Biological Crop Protection Market is accounted for $8.54 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $23.42 billion by 2032 growing at a CAGR of 15.5% during the forecast period. Biological crop protection describes the use of natural materials and organisms to manage weeds, pests, and diseases in agriculture, resulting in healthier crops with less dependence on chemical pesticides. This strategy uses natural plant extracts, microbial agents like bacteria and fungi, and beneficial insects like parasitic wasps and ladybugs. Moreover, biological crop protection lessens the impact on the environment and promotes sustainable farming methods by boosting biodiversity and collaborating with natural ecosystems. In integrated pest management (IPM) systems, it is essential for farmers to produce safer food while preserving the health of the soil and environment.

According to the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), up to 40% of global crop production is lost annually due to pests and diseases, underscoring the urgent need for sustainable pest management approaches-including biological crop protection-to enhance food security and environmental resilience.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Growing customer interest in high-quality, residue-free food

Growing environmental and health consciousness among modern consumers has increased demand for food that is sustainably produced, organic, and residue-free. Particularly in metropolitan and export-oriented markets, worries about pesticide residues in fruits, vegetables, and grains have grown. Growers are therefore under pressure to maintain productivity while meeting these expectations. Because biological crop protection products are safe for human health and non-toxic, they are becoming more popular as clean-label food trends gain traction. Additionally, in order to maintain consumer trust and gain access to premium markets, producers are being pushed to invest in biological and abandon synthetic chemicals as a result of this shift in consumer preferences.

Restraint:

Environmental sensitivity and varying efficacy

The variable effectiveness of biological crop protection products in field settings is one of their biggest drawbacks. Biologicals are sensitive to environmental variables like temperature, humidity, soil pH, UV exposure, and application timing, in contrast to synthetic chemicals that frequently produce immediate and broad-spectrum effects. Numerous microorganisms utilized in biopesticides have difficulty surviving and colonizing in unfavorable environments, particularly in arid or harsh climates. Furthermore, biological controls typically work more slowly, taking longer to establish and control pest populations.

Opportunity:

Beneficial government regulations and assistance

Globally, governments are realizing more and more how crucial biological solutions are to maintaining environmental preservation, food security, and farmer income stability. Incentives, subsidies, and policy changes have been implemented by many to encourage sustainable inputs. By 2030, the EU's Green Deal and Farm to Fork Strategy seek to cut the use of chemical pesticides by 50%, which will directly benefit biologicals. Brazil's National Bioinputs Program is expediting bio-input approvals, and India is providing subsidies for organic input kits. Moreover, the favorable conditions created by these policy changes allow manufacturers to expand their operations, penetrate new markets, and make R&D investments.

Threat:

Strong competition from artificial agrochemicals

Synthetic agrochemicals continue to dominate the global crop protection market because of their broad-spectrum activity, fast-acting performance, and established supply chains, even in the face of mounting environmental and regulatory pressure. Compared to biological products, chemical pesticides are frequently less expensive, simpler to use, and require less technical know-how. Furthermore, many farmers who are under pressure to ensure immediate crop protection continue to turn to synthetic options, which are heavily promoted by big agrochemical companies. Due to convenience and familiarity, synthetic inputs frequently outperform biologicals in markets with lax regulations or inconsistent enforcement.

Covid-19 Impact:

The market for biological crop protection was affected in a variety of ways by the COVID-19 pandemic. Short-term supply chain interruptions and lockdowns made it more difficult to manufacture, distribute, and make biological inputs available, especially in areas that relied on imported microbial strains or formulations. Regulatory slowdowns and restricted workforce mobility also caused delays in R&D, product registrations, and field trials. However, the pandemic raised awareness of food safety, health, and sustainable agriculture around the world, which increased interest in residue-free and environmentally friendly crop protection techniques. Renewing policy support and investment in sustainable inputs, including biologicals, became necessary as a result of the crisis's emphasis on the need for resilient, regional agricultural systems.

The microbial pesticides segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The microbial pesticides segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period. Microorganisms that occur naturally, including bacteria, fungi, viruses, and protozoa, are the source of microbial pesticides. These substances, such as Trichoderma species and Bacillus thuringiensis (BT), are used to target particular pests or plant diseases while remaining safe for the environment, people, and non-target organisms. In addition to regulatory support in major agricultural regions, their growing popularity is fueled by their compatibility with organic farming and Integrated Pest Management (IPM) practices. The most widely used and financially successful sector of the biological crop protection industry is microbial pesticides, whose stability and effectiveness have been enhanced by ongoing innovation in formulation and delivery techniques.

The biofungicides segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

Over the forecast period, the biofungicides segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate. The main component of biofungicides is beneficial microbes like Trichoderma, Bacillus subtilis, and Pseudomonas fluorescens, which target fungal pathogens that cause crop diseases like downy mildew, powdery mildew, and Fusarium wilt. Climate change-related fungal outbreaks, growing resistance to chemical fungicides, and growing consumer demand for organic fruits and vegetables are all contributing factors to their explosive growth. The dual action of biofungicides-disease suppression and soil health enhancement-makes them popular for sustainable farming and Integrated Pest Management (IPM).

Region with largest share:

During the forecast period, the North America region is expected to hold the largest market share, principally propelled by the US, which is at the forefront of the use of biological solutions, including biopesticides. Established organic farming methods, strict pesticide laws enforced by organizations such as the U.S. EPA, and high consumer demand for sustainable, residue-free produce are the main drivers of the region's dominance. A strong R&D infrastructure, early microbial product commercialization, and active involvement from both startups and large agribusiness players are additional advantages for North America. The market penetration is further enhanced by technological advancements in precision agriculture, rapid growth in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs, and supportive government policies.

Region with highest CAGR:

Over the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is anticipated to exhibit the highest CAGR. Growing demand for organic food, growing awareness of sustainable farming, and government programs supporting environmentally friendly agriculture are the main drivers of this quick expansion. Through subsidies, organic farming programs, and residue-free export regulations, nations like China, Vietnam, and India are aggressively promoting the use of bio-inputs. A move toward biological alternatives is also being prompted by the region's severe problems with soil degradation and excessive use of synthetic agrochemicals. Asia-Pacific is the region with the fastest rate of growth in the biologicals industry worldwide due to its large and growing population, increasing agricultural activity, and improving regulatory frameworks.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players in Biological Crop Protection Market include Bayer AG, Syngenta AG, Novozymes A/S, Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd., BASF SE, FMC Corporation, Corteva Agriscience, Adama Ltd., BioWorks, Inc, Seipasa S.A., Nufarm Limited, Andermatt Biocontrol AG, Valent BioSciences Corporation, Marrone Bio Innovations Inc. and BioSafe Systems LLC.

Key Developments:

In July 2025, BASF and Equinor have signed a long-term strategic agreement for the annual delivery of up to 23 terawatt hours of natural gas over a ten-year period. The contract secures a substantial share of BASF's natural gas needs in Europe. This agreement further strengthens our partnership with BASF. Natural gas not only provides energy security to Europe but also critical feedstock to European industries. I am very happy that our gas also supports BASF's efforts to reduce their carbon footprint.

In June 2025, FMC Corporation announced a strategic agreement with Corteva Agriscience that will expand FMC's fluindapyr fungicide technology in the U.S. corn and soybean markets. The collaboration between the two agricultural companies will enable more U.S. growers to combat challenging foliar diseases, such as tar spot and southern rust, with this novel fungicide active ingredient.

In March 2025, Bayer and Suzhou Puhe BioPharma Co.,Ltd announced that they have entered into a global license agreement for Puhe BioPharma's oral, small molecule PRMT5 inhibitor that selectively targets MTAP-deleted tumors. Under the agreement, Bayer obtains an exclusive worldwide license to develop, manufacture and commercialize the MTA-cooperative PRMT5 inhibitor.

Product Types Covered:

  • Microbial Pesticides
  • Plant-Incorporated Protectants (PIP)
  • Biochemical Pesticides

Types Covered:

  • Bioinsecticides
  • Biofungicides
  • Bionematicides
  • Other Types

Forms Covered:

  • Liquid
  • Powder
  • Granules

Sources Covered:

  • Natural Microbial
  • Biologically Derived Compounds

Crop Types Covered:

  • Cereals & Grains
  • Oilseeds & pulses
  • Fruits & vegetables
  • Other Crop Types

Applications Covered:

  • Foliar Spray
  • Seed Treatment
  • Soil Treatment
  • Other Applications

Regions Covered:

  • North America
    • US
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • Italy
    • France
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • Japan
    • China
    • India
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • South America
    • Argentina
    • Brazil
    • Chile
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle East & Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • Qatar
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:

  • Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
  • Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
  • Covers Market data for the years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2028, and 2032
  • Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
  • Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
  • Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
  • Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
  • Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

  • Company Profiling
    • Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
    • SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
  • Regional Segmentation
    • Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
  • Competitive Benchmarking
    • Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

  • 2.1 Abstract
  • 2.2 Stake Holders
  • 2.3 Research Scope
  • 2.4 Research Methodology
    • 2.4.1 Data Mining
    • 2.4.2 Data Analysis
    • 2.4.3 Data Validation
    • 2.4.4 Research Approach
  • 2.5 Research Sources
    • 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
    • 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
    • 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis

  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Drivers
  • 3.3 Restraints
  • 3.4 Opportunities
  • 3.5 Threats
  • 3.6 Product Analysis
  • 3.7 Application Analysis
  • 3.8 Emerging Markets
  • 3.9 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

  • 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
  • 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
  • 4.3 Threat of substitutes
  • 4.4 Threat of new entrants
  • 4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Biological Crop Protection Market, By Product Type

  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Microbial Pesticides
  • 5.3 Plant-Incorporated Protectants (PIP)
  • 5.4 Biochemical Pesticides

6 Global Biological Crop Protection Market, By Type

  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2 Bioinsecticides
  • 6.3 Biofungicides
  • 6.4 Bionematicides
  • 6.5 Other Types

7 Global Biological Crop Protection Market, By Form

  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 Liquid
  • 7.3 Powder
  • 7.4 Granules

8 Global Biological Crop Protection Market, By Source

  • 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.2 Natural Microbial
  • 8.3 Biologically Derived Compounds

9 Global Biological Crop Protection Market, By Crop Type

  • 9.1 Introduction
  • 9.2 Cereals & Grains
  • 9.3 Oilseeds & pulses
  • 9.4 Fruits & vegetables
  • 9.5 Other Crop Types

10 Global Biological Crop Protection Market, By Application

  • 10.1 Introduction
  • 10.2 Foliar Spray
  • 10.3 Seed Treatment
  • 10.4 Soil Treatment
  • 10.5 Other Applications

11 Global Biological Crop Protection Market, By Geography

  • 11.1 Introduction
  • 11.2 North America
    • 11.2.1 US
    • 11.2.2 Canada
    • 11.2.3 Mexico
  • 11.3 Europe
    • 11.3.1 Germany
    • 11.3.2 UK
    • 11.3.3 Italy
    • 11.3.4 France
    • 11.3.5 Spain
    • 11.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 11.4 Asia Pacific
    • 11.4.1 Japan
    • 11.4.2 China
    • 11.4.3 India
    • 11.4.4 Australia
    • 11.4.5 New Zealand
    • 11.4.6 South Korea
    • 11.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
  • 11.5 South America
    • 11.5.1 Argentina
    • 11.5.2 Brazil
    • 11.5.3 Chile
    • 11.5.4 Rest of South America
  • 11.6 Middle East & Africa
    • 11.6.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 11.6.2 UAE
    • 11.6.3 Qatar
    • 11.6.4 South Africa
    • 11.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

12 Key Developments

  • 12.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
  • 12.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
  • 12.3 New Product Launch
  • 12.4 Expansions
  • 12.5 Other Key Strategies

13 Company Profiling

  • 13.1 Bayer AG
  • 13.2 Syngenta AG
  • 13.3 Novozymes A/S
  • 13.4 Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.
  • 13.5 BASF SE
  • 13.6 FMC Corporation
  • 13.7 Corteva Agriscience
  • 13.8 Adama Ltd.
  • 13.9 BioWorks, Inc
  • 13.10 Seipasa S.A.
  • 13.11 Nufarm Limited
  • 13.12 Andermatt Biocontrol AG
  • 13.13 Valent BioSciences Corporation
  • 13.14 Marrone Bio Innovations Inc.
  • 13.15 BioSafe Systems LLC

List of Tables

  • Table 1 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Region (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 2 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Product Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 3 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Microbial Pesticides (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 4 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Plant-Incorporated Protectants (PIP) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 5 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Biochemical Pesticides (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 6 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 7 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Bioinsecticides (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 8 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Biofungicides (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 9 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Bionematicides (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 10 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Other Types (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 11 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Form (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 12 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Liquid (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 13 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Powder (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 14 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Granules (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 15 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Source (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 16 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Natural Microbial (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 17 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Biologically Derived Compounds (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 18 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Crop Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 19 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Cereals & Grains (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 20 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Oilseeds & pulses (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 21 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Fruits & vegetables (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 22 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Other Crop Types (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 23 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Application (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 24 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Foliar Spray (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 25 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Seed Treatment (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 26 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Soil Treatment (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 27 Global Biological Crop Protection Market Outlook, By Other Applications (2024-2032) ($MN)

Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.