查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1813411

2032 年农业废弃物包装市场预测：按材料类型、包装类型、应用、最终用户和地区进行的全球分析

Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Forecasts to 2032 - Global Analysis By Material Type, Packaging Type, Application, End User and By Geography
出版日期: | 出版商: Stratistics Market Research Consulting | 英文 200+ Pages | 商品交期: 2-3个工作天内

价格

根据 Stratistics MRC 的数据，全球农业废弃物包装市场预计在 2025 年达到 26.3 亿美元，到 2032 年将达到 42.8 亿美元，预测期内的复合年增长率为 7.2%。

农业废弃物包装涉及将作物壳、秸秆和其他有机产品等农业残留物转化为环保包装材料。这项创新技术提供了一种可生物降解和可堆肥的传统石油基包装替代品，从而应对了全球塑胶废弃物挑战。它不仅减少了环境破坏，还透过重新利用原本未开发的生物质为农民创造了新的价值。日益增强的环保意识、日益严格的塑胶法规以及消费者对永续产品的日益增长的偏好，正在加速其应用。透过形成资源闭环并促进废弃物价值转化，农业废弃物包装在推动循环经济、支持生态平衡和农村经济发展方面发挥关键作用。

根据联合国粮食及农业组织（FAO）的数据，全球整体每年在植物和动物生产中使用约1,250万吨塑胶製品，其中很大一部分被废弃物，包括用于农业投入品和产品的塑胶包装。

日益增长的环境问题

环境永续性仍是影响农业废弃物包装市场的关键因素。传统塑胶包装与严重的生态学问题有关，包括土壤和水污染以及长期的掩埋堆积。人们对这些问题的认识不断提高，加速了对可生物降解和可再生包装解决方案的需求。农业废弃物包装完美契合这些目标，因为它将作物残茬转化为可自然分解的环保材料。随着各国政府强制禁止一次性塑料，以及消费者拥抱永续的生活方式，农业废弃物包装被定位为保护自然生态系统和促进更绿色未来的关键创新。

生产成本高

限制农业废弃物包装市场发展的主要障碍是相对较高的生产成本。将稻壳和秸秆等作物残渣转化为耐用的包装需要先进的技术、昂贵的机械设备和专门的加工步骤。这些要求推高了整体生产成本，使得基于农业废弃物的包装比传统塑胶更昂贵。对于小型生产商而言，在基础设施和设备上进行大量投资，这给扩大业务带来了额外的挑战。这种成本差距往往会阻碍企业在价格为决定因素的竞争性市场中开展业务。在技​​术进步和大规模生产能够降低成本之前，高成本仍然是广泛应用的关键障碍。

增加政府支持和监管

政府的扶持政策为农业废弃物包装带来了巨大的机会。全球范围内对一次性塑胶的广泛禁令正迫使各行各业探索可生物降解的替代品。补贴和税收减免等财政奖励政策使企业更容易采用基于农业废弃物的解决方案。此外，国际社会对永续性和减碳的承诺正鼓励各行各业优先考虑循环经济实践。这种有利的法规环境不仅提高了人们的环保意识，也鼓励了对研究和基础设施的投资。随着世界各国政府加强环境立法，农业废弃物包装有望成为主流包装选择，并加速多个产业部门的成长。

与传统包装的竞争

农业废弃物包装市场面临传统包装（尤其是塑胶包装）主导地位的巨大威胁。塑胶具有强大的竞争优势，因为它价格低廉、供应广泛，并拥有成熟的供应链。许多公司选择塑胶而非永续材料，是因为塑胶价格实惠，且在大规模生产中已得到验证的可靠性。相较之下，农业废弃物包装仍在发展中，扩充性有限，生产成本高。如果没有技术突破或强而有力的政策支持，很难在公平的竞争环境中竞争。这种对塑胶包装的根深蒂固的依赖持续阻碍着环保替代品的发展，并减缓了大众市场的普及。

COVID-19的影响

新冠疫情对农业废弃物包装市场的影响既有正面的一面，也有负面的一面。最初，封锁和限制措施扰乱了原材料供应，降低了劳动力运转率，并阻碍了生产活动。这些挑战导致生产延误，并增加了生产商的成本。儘管有这些挫折，但疫情提振了对卫生和永续包装的需求，尤其是在食品宅配和线上零售领域。消费者的环保意识增强，并寻求传统塑胶的替代品。随着经济重新开放，政府所推行的绿色实践政策为经济復苏提供了支持。因此，新冠疫情加速了向永续解决方案的转变，使农业废弃物包装成为一个前景光明的长期市场趋势。

预计预测期内纸张和纸板市场规模最大

预计在预测期内，纸和纸板领域将占据最大的市场份额。这种领先地位得益于其材料的永续性、可再生、耐用性、可回收性和价格实惠性，这些特性使其在各个包装领域都获得了广泛的认可。研究表明，到2022年，纸和纸板将占全球可生物降解包装市场的约53.7%。此外，在更广泛的永续包装产业中，纸和纸板将占材料消耗的大部分，到2024年将贡献总收益的近41%。成熟的生产和回收基础设施，加上强大的消费者接受度，将继续巩固其市场主导地位。

预计预测期内，袋子和小袋部分将出现最高的复合年增长率

预计袋装和袋式包装领域将在预测期内实现最高成长率。这一快速增长的动力源于各种农业和食品相关应用对灵活、轻巧且环保的包装日益增长的需求。这些解决方案经济实惠、节省空间，并能延长产品保质期，使其成为整个供应链的首选。线上零售的影响力日益增强、包装食品的消费以及永续性意识的增强，进一步加速了这些包装的普及。与托盘、麻袋、散装包装和硬质包装等成长速度较慢的替代品相比，袋装和袋式包装拥有明显的成长优势，巩固了其作为高成长包装领域领先地位。

占比最大的地区：

预计欧洲地区将在预测期内占据最大的市场份额。欧洲的主导地位得益于强有力的环境立法、积极的政策框架以及公众对绿色实践的大力支持。欧盟循环经济行动计画和一次性塑胶禁令等措施正在显着推动对永续包装材料的需求。此外，该地区还受益于完善的回收系统、对永续材料研究的大量投资以及零售商和品牌的广泛采用。这些优势使欧洲成为全球农业废弃物包装的领先地区。

复合年增长率最高的地区：

预计亚太地区在预测期内的复合年增长率最高。推动这一快速成长的因素包括强劲的经济成长、不断增长的城市人口以及零售和线上平台对包装商品的需求激增。地区政府在禁止使用一次性塑胶和鼓励使用永续替代品方面发挥关键作用。同时，印度和中国等国家丰富的农业废弃物为环保包装的生产提供了经济实惠的投入。消费者对永续产品的偏好正在稳定成长，各行各业也大力投资绿色科技。

免费客製化服务：

此报告的订阅者可以使用以下免费自订选项之一：

  • 公司简介
    • 对最多三家其他市场公司进行全面分析
    • 主要企业的SWOT分析（最多3家公司）
  • 区域细分
    • 根据客户兴趣对主要国家进行的市场估计、预测和复合年增长率（註：基于可行性检查）
  • 竞争基准化分析
    • 根据产品系列、地理分布和策略联盟对主要企业基准化分析

目录

第一章执行摘要

第二章 前言

  • 概述
  • 相关利益者
  • 调查范围
  • 调查方法
    • 资料探勘
    • 数据分析
    • 数据检验
    • 研究途径
  • 研究材料
    • 主要研究资料
    • 次级研究资讯来源
    • 先决条件

第三章市场走势分析

  • 驱动程式
  • 抑制因素
  • 机会
  • 威胁
  • 应用分析
  • 最终用户分析
  • 新兴市场
  • COVID-19的影响

第四章 波特五力分析

  • 供应商的议价能力
  • 买方的议价能力
  • 替代品的威胁
  • 新进入者的威胁
  • 竞争对手之间的竞争

5. 全球农业废弃物包装市场（依材料类型）

  • 生质塑胶
  • 纸和纸板
  • 纤维素材料
  • 农业废弃物复合材料
  • 淀粉基聚合物
  • 大麻和黄麻纤维

6. 全球农业废弃物包装市场（依包装类型）

  • 袋子和小袋
  • 托盘和容器
  • 包装和薄膜
  • 散装包装
  • 麻袋和内衬
  • 硬质包装

7. 全球农业废弃物包装市场（依应用）

  • 肥料
  • 杀虫剂
  • 种子和谷物
  • 新鲜农产品
  • 动物饲料
  • 堆肥和土壤改良剂
  • 农具及配件

8. 全球农业废弃物包装市场（依最终用户）

  • 农民
  • 农药公司
  • 种子生产商
  • 食品批发商
  • 农产品零售商
  • 政府和非政府组织

9. 全球农业废弃物包装市场（按地区）

  • 北美洲
    • 美国
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 欧洲
    • 德国
    • 英国
    • 义大利
    • 法国
    • 西班牙
    • 其他欧洲国家
  • 亚太地区
    • 日本
    • 中国
    • 印度
    • 澳洲
    • 纽西兰
    • 韩国
    • 其他亚太地区
  • 南美洲
    • 阿根廷
    • 巴西
    • 智利
    • 南美洲其他地区
  • 中东和非洲
    • 沙乌地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公国
    • 卡达
    • 南非
    • 其他中东和非洲地区

第十章：重大进展

  • 协议、伙伴关係、合作和合资企业
  • 收购与合併
  • 新产品发布
  • 业务扩展
  • 其他关键策略

第十一章 公司概况

  • Sonoco Products Company
  • Mondi Group
  • Greif Inc.
  • 3R-BioPhosphate Ltd.
  • Amcor PLC
  • Bemis Company, Inc.
  • Packaging Corporation of America
  • LC Packaging International BV
  • Pakka Limited
  • Proampac LLC
  • Flex-Pack
  • SAFEPACK Industries Ltd.
  • Epac Holdings LLC
  • Mpacks
  • BioD Inc
Product Code: SMRC30860

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market is accounted for $2.63 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $4.28 billion by 2032 growing at a CAGR of 7.2% during the forecast period. Agricultural waste packaging involves transforming farm residues like crop husks, stalks, and other organic by-products into eco-friendly packaging materials. This innovation addresses the global challenge of plastic waste by offering a biodegradable and compostable alternative to traditional petroleum-based packaging. Beyond reducing environmental damage, it creates new value for farmers by repurposing biomass that would otherwise go unused. Growing environmental awareness, stricter regulations on plastics and rising consumer preference for sustainable products are accelerating adoption. By closing resource loops and promoting waste-to-value practices, agricultural waste packaging plays a crucial role in advancing the circular economy while supporting both ecological balance and rural economies.

According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, Globally, around 12.5 million tonnes of plastic products are used in plant and animal production each year, and a significant share of this becomes waste, including plastic packaging for agricultural inputs and products.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Rising environmental concerns

Environmental sustainability remains a critical driver shaping the agricultural waste packaging market. Traditional plastic packaging has been linked to serious ecological issues, including soil contamination, water pollution, and long-term landfill accumulation. As awareness of these problems grows, demand for biodegradable and renewable packaging solutions is accelerating. Agricultural waste packaging aligns perfectly with these goals since it transforms crop residues into eco-friendly materials that decompose naturally. With governments enforcing stricter bans on single-use plastics and consumers embracing sustainable lifestyles, agricultural waste packaging is positioned as a vital innovation for protecting natural ecosystems and promoting a greener future.

Restraint:

High production costs

A major barrier restricting the agricultural waste packaging market is its relatively high manufacturing cost. Converting crop residues like husks and stalks into durable packaging requires advanced technologies, costly machinery, and specialized treatment processes. These requirements raise overall production expenses, making agricultural waste-based packaging more expensive than conventional plastics. For small producers, the need for heavy investments in infrastructure and equipment creates additional challenges in scaling operations. This cost gap often discourages businesses operating in competitive markets where price is a deciding factor. Until technological progress and larger-scale production help reduce expenses, high costs remain a crucial obstacle to wider adoption.

Opportunity:

Increasing government support and regulations

Supportive government initiatives are unlocking major opportunities for agricultural waste packaging. With bans on single-use plastics spreading worldwide, industries are being compelled to explore biodegradable alternatives. Policies that provide financial incentives, including subsidies and tax breaks, make it easier for businesses to adopt agricultural waste-based solutions. Moreover, international commitments toward sustainability and carbon reduction are encouraging industries to prioritize circular economy practices. This favorable regulatory environment not only boosts awareness but also drives investment in research and infrastructure. As governments intensify environmental legislation, agricultural waste packaging is positioned to become a mainstream packaging choice, accelerating growth across multiple industrial sectors.

Threat:

Competition from conventional packaging

The agricultural waste packaging market faces a significant threat from the dominance of conventional packaging, particularly plastics. Plastics are inexpensive, widely available, and supported by mature supply chains, giving them a strong competitive edge. Many businesses choose plastic over sustainable options because of its affordability and proven reliability in large-scale operations. In contrast, agricultural waste packaging is still evolving, with limited scalability and higher production costs. Without technological breakthroughs or strong policy support, it struggles to compete on equal terms. This entrenched reliance on plastic packaging continues to undermine the growth of eco-friendly alternatives and slows down their mass-market adoption.

Covid-19 Impact:

COVID-19 influenced the agricultural waste packaging market in both negative and positive ways. During the early phases, lockdowns and restrictions disrupted raw material supplies, reduced workforce availability, and hampered manufacturing activities. These challenges led to production delays and increased costs for producers. Despite these setbacks, the pandemic boosted demand for hygienic and sustainable packaging, especially in food delivery and online retail. Consumers became more conscious of environmental safety and sought alternatives to conventional plastics. As economies reopened, government policies promoting green practices supported recovery. Consequently, COVID-19 accelerated the shift toward sustainable solutions, positioning agricultural waste packaging as a promising long-term market trend.

The paper & paperboard segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The paper & paperboard segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period. This leadership is driven by the material's sustainability, renewability, durability, recyclability, and affordability, which make it highly favored across various packaging sectors. Research indicates that paper and paperboard represented about 53.7% of the global biodegradable packaging market in 2022. Furthermore, in the wider sustainable packaging industry, they dominated material consumption, contributing nearly 41% of total revenue in 2024. The presence of a well-established production and recycling infrastructure, along with strong consumer acceptance, continues to strengthen their market dominance.

The bags & pouches segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

Over the forecast period, the bags & pouches segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate. Their rapid growth is driven by increasing demand for flexible, lightweight, and eco-friendly packaging that serves diverse agricultural and food-related applications. These solutions are economical, space-saving, and enhance product shelf performance, making them a preferred choice across supply chains. The rising influence of online retail, packaged food consumption, and sustainability awareness further accelerates their adoption. Compared to alternatives like trays, sacks, bulk packaging, and rigid formats, which expand at more moderate rates, bags and pouches, clearly dominates in growth pace, ensuring their position as the leading high-growth rate packaging segment.

Region with largest share:

During the forecast period, the Europe region is expected to hold the largest market share. Europe's dominance is driven by robust environmental legislation, proactive policy frameworks, and strong public support for green practices. Initiatives such as the EU Circular Economy Action Plan and bans on single-use plastics have substantially fueled demand for sustainable packaging materials. Furthermore, the region benefits from sophisticated recycle systems, significant investments in sustainable material research, and wide-scale adoption by retailers and brands. These combined strengths make Europe the leading region for agricultural waste-based packaging on a global scale.

Region with highest CAGR:

Over the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is anticipated to exhibit the highest CAGR. Factors driving this rapid rise include strong economic growth, increasing urban populations, and booming demand for packaged goods through retail and online platforms. Regional governments are playing a key role by banning single-use plastics and incentivizing sustainable alternatives. At the same time, plentiful agricultural residues in countries like India and China provide affordable inputs for eco-friendly packaging production. Consumer preference for sustainable products is rising steadily, while industries are investing heavily in green technologies.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players in Agricultural Waste Packaging Market include Sonoco Products Company, Mondi Group, Greif Inc., 3R-BioPhosphate Ltd., Amcor PLC, Bemis Company, Inc., Packaging Corporation of America, LC Packaging International BV, Pakka Limited, Proampac LLC, Flex-Pack, SAFEPACK Industries Ltd., Epac Holdings LLC, Mpacks and BioD Inc.

Key Developments:

In July 2025, Greif, Inc. announced it has entered into a definitive agreement to divest its Containerboard business, including its CorrChoice sheet feeder network, in an all-cash transaction for $1.8 billion to Packaging Corporation of America. The transaction is expected to close by the end of Greif's fiscal year 2025, and is subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals.

In December 2024, Sonoco Products Company announced it has entered into an agreement to sell its Thermoformed and Flexibles Packaging business ("TFP") to TOPPAN Holdings Inc. for approximately $1.8 billion on a cash-free and debt-free basis and subject to customary adjustments. The Transaction, which reflects the completion of the previously announced strategic review of Sonoco's TFP business, is subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals, and is expected to close in the first half of 2025.

In March 2024, Mondi PLC and DS Smith PLC, two United Kingdom-based paperboard and packaging producers, have disclosed reaching an agreement in principle for Mondi to acquire DS Smith. The agreement covers key financial terms of a possible all-share offer by Mondi for DS Smith, pursuant to which Mondi would acquire the entire issued and to-be-issued share capital of DS Smith, according to the companies.

Material Types Covered:

  • Bioplastics
  • Paper & Paperboard
  • Cellulose-based Materials
  • Agricultural Residue Composites
  • Starch-based Polymers
  • Hemp & Jute Fibers

Packaging Types Covered:

  • Bags & Pouches
  • Trays & Containers
  • Wraps & Films
  • Bulk Packaging
  • Sacks & Liners
  • Rigid Packaging

Applications Covered:

  • Fertilizers
  • Pesticides
  • Seeds & Grains
  • Fresh Produce
  • Animal Feed
  • Compost & Soil Amendments
  • Agri Tools & Accessories

End Users Covered:

  • Farmers
  • Agrochemical Companies
  • Seed Producers
  • Food Distributors
  • Agri Retailers
  • Government & NGOs

Regions Covered:

  • North America
    • US
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • Italy
    • France
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • Japan
    • China
    • India
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • South America
    • Argentina
    • Brazil
    • Chile
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle East & Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • Qatar
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:

  • Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
  • Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
  • Covers Market data for the years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2028, and 2032
  • Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
  • Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
  • Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
  • Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
  • Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

  • Company Profiling
    • Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
    • SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
  • Regional Segmentation
    • Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
  • Competitive Benchmarking
    • Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

  • 2.1 Abstract
  • 2.2 Stake Holders
  • 2.3 Research Scope
  • 2.4 Research Methodology
    • 2.4.1 Data Mining
    • 2.4.2 Data Analysis
    • 2.4.3 Data Validation
    • 2.4.4 Research Approach
  • 2.5 Research Sources
    • 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
    • 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
    • 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis

  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Drivers
  • 3.3 Restraints
  • 3.4 Opportunities
  • 3.5 Threats
  • 3.6 Application Analysis
  • 3.7 End User Analysis
  • 3.8 Emerging Markets
  • 3.9 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

  • 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
  • 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
  • 4.3 Threat of substitutes
  • 4.4 Threat of new entrants
  • 4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market, By Material Type

  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Bioplastics
  • 5.3 Paper & Paperboard
  • 5.4 Cellulose-based Materials
  • 5.5 Agricultural Residue Composites
  • 5.6 Starch-based Polymers
  • 5.7 Hemp & Jute Fibers

6 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market, By Packaging Type

  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2 Bags & Pouches
  • 6.3 Trays & Containers
  • 6.4 Wraps & Films
  • 6.5 Bulk Packaging
  • 6.6 Sacks & Liners
  • 6.7 Rigid Packaging

7 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market, By Application

  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 Fertilizers
  • 7.3 Pesticides
  • 7.4 Seeds & Grains
  • 7.5 Fresh Produce
  • 7.6 Animal Feed
  • 7.7 Compost & Soil Amendments
  • 7.8 Agri Tools & Accessories

8 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market, By End User

  • 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.2 Farmers
  • 8.3 Agrochemical Companies
  • 8.4 Seed Producers
  • 8.5 Food Distributors
  • 8.6 Agri Retailers
  • 8.7 Government & NGOs

9 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market, By Geography

  • 9.1 Introduction
  • 9.2 North America
    • 9.2.1 US
    • 9.2.2 Canada
    • 9.2.3 Mexico
  • 9.3 Europe
    • 9.3.1 Germany
    • 9.3.2 UK
    • 9.3.3 Italy
    • 9.3.4 France
    • 9.3.5 Spain
    • 9.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 9.4 Asia Pacific
    • 9.4.1 Japan
    • 9.4.2 China
    • 9.4.3 India
    • 9.4.4 Australia
    • 9.4.5 New Zealand
    • 9.4.6 South Korea
    • 9.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
  • 9.5 South America
    • 9.5.1 Argentina
    • 9.5.2 Brazil
    • 9.5.3 Chile
    • 9.5.4 Rest of South America
  • 9.6 Middle East & Africa
    • 9.6.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 9.6.2 UAE
    • 9.6.3 Qatar
    • 9.6.4 South Africa
    • 9.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

10 Key Developments

  • 10.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
  • 10.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
  • 10.3 New Product Launch
  • 10.4 Expansions
  • 10.5 Other Key Strategies

11 Company Profiling

  • 11.1 Sonoco Products Company
  • 11.2 Mondi Group
  • 11.3 Greif Inc.
  • 11.4 3R-BioPhosphate Ltd.
  • 11.5 Amcor PLC
  • 11.6 Bemis Company, Inc.
  • 11.7 Packaging Corporation of America
  • 11.8 LC Packaging International BV
  • 11.9 Pakka Limited
  • 11.10 Proampac LLC
  • 11.11 Flex-Pack
  • 11.12 SAFEPACK Industries Ltd.
  • 11.13 Epac Holdings LLC
  • 11.14 Mpacks
  • 11.15 BioD Inc

List of Tables

  • Table 1 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Region (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 2 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Material Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 3 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Bioplastics (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 4 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Paper & Paperboard (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 5 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Cellulose-based Materials (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 6 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Agricultural Residue Composites (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 7 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Starch-based Polymers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 8 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Hemp & Jute Fibers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 9 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Packaging Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 10 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Bags & Pouches (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 11 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Trays & Containers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 12 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Wraps & Films (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 13 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Bulk Packaging (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 14 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Sacks & Liners (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 15 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Rigid Packaging (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 16 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Application (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 17 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Fertilizers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 18 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Pesticides (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 19 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Seeds & Grains (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 20 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Fresh Produce (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 21 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Animal Feed (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 22 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Compost & Soil Amendments (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 23 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Agri Tools & Accessories (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 24 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By End User (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 25 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Farmers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 26 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Agrochemical Companies (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 27 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Seed Producers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 28 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Food Distributors (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 29 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Agri Retailers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 30 Global Agricultural Waste Packaging Market Outlook, By Government & NGOs (2024-2032) ($MN)

Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.