查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1818058

全球饲料霉菌毒素粘合剂市场：预测至2032年－依产品类型、牲畜、成分、形式、销售管道及地区进行分析

Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Forecasts to 2032 - Global Analysis By Product Type (Mycotoxin Binders, Mycotoxin Modifiers, and Other Product Types), Livestock, Source, Form, Sales Channel, and By Geography
出版日期: | 出版商: Stratistics Market Research Consulting | 英文 200+ Pages | 商品交期: 2-3个工作天内

价格

根据 Stratistics MRC 的数据，全球饲料霉菌毒素粘合剂市场预计在 2025 年达到 27.5 亿美元，到 2032 年将达到 39.6 亿美元，预测期内的复合年增长率为 5.3%。

饲料霉菌毒素粘合剂和调理剂是用于保护动物免受饲料中霉菌毒素有害影响的饲料添加剂。粘合剂将霉菌毒素困在消化道中，阻止其吸收，而改质剂则改变霉菌毒素的化学结构，以降低其毒性。透过提高饲料安全性，这些添加剂可以改善动物的健康、生长和生产力，同时最大限度地降低毒素相关风险，并有助于提高畜牧生产系统的整体效率和品质。

根据 BIOMIN 2018 年世界霉菌毒素调查，北美霉菌毒素相关风险为 73%，而 2016 年为 66%。

对优质畜产品的需求不断增加

消费者对优质肉类、乳製品和家禽的偏好日益增长，推动了对改善动物健康和生产力的饲料添加剂的需求。霉菌毒素粘合剂越来越被视为维护饲料安全和优化牲畜生产性能的关键。随着生产商努力满足更严格的品质标准，粘合剂在防止毒素相关损失方面的作用变得越来越重要。收入水准的提高和都市化也促进了动物性蛋白质消费量的成长，尤其是在新兴经济体。这种转变促使饲料製造商投资于支持动物福利和产量的先进配方。对可追溯、无污染食品的追求正在推动霉菌毒素缓解策略的采用。

小规模畜牧养殖户缺乏意识

许多小规模畜牧养殖户仍依赖传统的饲养方式，取得科学知识、兽医指导或现代饲料技术的管道有限。这种认知上的差距往往导致霉菌毒素控制解决方案的采用率低下，从而导致牲畜生产力下降、疾病易感性增加和经济损失。进一步采用霉菌毒素控制解决方案面临的挑战包括政府推广项目不足、培训设施有限以及在农村和发展中地区缺乏对先进饲料安全实践的推广。这种认知上的缺乏减缓了市场成长，并阻碍了有效饲料安全措施的广泛实施。

对有机和天然粘合剂的需求不断增长

随着饲料产业转向永续性，天然和有机霉菌毒素粘合剂越来越受欢迎。消费者对畜牧生产中使用的投入越来越严格，这推动了人们对洁净标示饲料解决方案的兴趣。植物来源和矿物衍生的粘合剂是合成添加剂的强力替代品，并且符合有机认证标准。这一趋势为平衡功效与环境相容性的粘合剂配方创新打开了大门。对天然饲料成分的监管支持也鼓励製造商扩大其产品组合。向环保型畜牧生产的转变为这一细分领域的增长创造了肥沃的土壤。

来自替代饲料添加剂的竞争

益生菌、酵素、有机酸和植物性物质等产品正日益被用作经济高效的多功能解决方案，以改善牲畜健康和生产力。这些替代品通常除了能够降低霉菌毒素水平外，还具有许多益处，例如改善肠道健康、增强营养吸收和免疫力，因此对养殖者极具吸引力。此外，生物技术和天然添加剂配方的进步正在增强其功效，这进一步威胁着传统霉菌毒素粘合剂和调理剂的市场地位，并限制了其在竞争激烈的饲料市场中的成长潜力。

COVID-19的影响

疫情扰乱了供应链，减缓了饲料生产，并暂时影响了霉菌毒素粘合剂的分销。封锁措施减少了牲畜流动，并延迟了采购週期，尤其是在严格管制的地区。然而，这场危机也凸显了饲料安全在不确定时期维护牲畜健康的重要性。酪农和家禽等重要产业仍在继续运营，维持了对粘合剂的基本需求。随着市场趋于稳定，对生物安全和復原力的重新关注导致人们对保护性饲料添加剂的兴趣日益浓厚。最终，疫情凸显了粘合剂在维护我们食品体系中的战略作用。

霉菌毒素粘合剂市场预计将在预测期内成长至最大的

霉菌毒素粘合剂领域预计将在预测期内占据最大的市场份额，这得益于其在降低饲料污染风险方面的关键作用。它们能够有效中和多种毒素，因此对所有牲畜品种都至关重要。越来越多的生产商将粘合剂视为预防性投资，而非被动应对措施。确保饲料安全的监管压力也推动了其持续应用。粘合剂配方的创新正在提升其性能并扩大其应用范围。人们对霉菌毒素相关损失的认识不断提高，可能有助于该领域在整个预测期内保持领先地位。

预计在预测期内，间接销售部门的复合年增长率最高。

由于饲料生产商寻求灵活的采购方式，间接销售领域预计将在预测期内实现最高成长率。这些管道涵盖更广泛的地理区域，并能更有效率地服务分散的畜牧市场。数位化提高了产品透明度，简化了订购流程。由于间接采购的便利性和成本优势，中小型农场越来越青睐这种采购方式。製造商和经销商之间的策略伙伴关係正在进一步增强该通路的优势。随着农村连通性的改善，间接销售预计将超越传统的直销模式。

占比最大的地区：

预计亚太地区将在预测期内占据最大的市场份额，这得益于其庞大的牲畜存栏量和不断扩张的饲料产业。中国、印度和越南等国家对动物性蛋白质的需求不断增长，促使其对饲料安全解决方案进行投资。政府为促进牲畜健康和生产力而采取的措施也推动了粘合剂的应用。该地区农业基地的密度以及人们对霉菌毒素风险日益增长的认识，也促进了黏合剂的持续需求。当地製造商也在扩大生产以满足国内需求，从而扩大了市场准入。

免费客製化服务

此报告的订阅者可以选择以下免费自订选项之一：

  • 公司简介
    • 对最多三家其他公司进行全面分析
    • 主要企业的SWOT分析（最多3家公司）
  • 区域分类
    • 根据客户兴趣对主要国家进行的市场估计、预测和复合年增长率（註：基于可行性检查）
  • 竞争基准化分析
    • 根据产品系列、地理分布和策略联盟对主要企业基准化分析

目录

第一章执行摘要

第 2 章 简介

  • 概述
  • 相关利益者
  • 分析范围
  • 分析方法
    • 资料探勘
    • 数据分析
    • 数据检验
    • 分析方法
  • 分析材料
    • 主要研究资料
    • 二手研究资讯来源
    • 先决条件

第三章市场走势分析

  • 驱动程式
  • 抑制因素
  • 市场机会
  • 威胁
  • 产品分析
  • 新兴市场
  • COVID-19的感染疾病

第四章 波特五力分析

  • 供应商的议价能力
  • 买方议价能力
  • 替代产品的威胁
  • 新参与企业的威胁
  • 企业之间的竞争

5. 全球饲料霉菌毒素粘合剂市场（依产品种类）

  • 霉菌毒素粘合剂
    • 黏土
    • 膨润土
    • 酵母菌细胞壁
    • 活性碳
  • 霉菌毒素调节剂
    • 酵素
    • 酵母菌
    • 细菌
  • 其他产品类型

6. 全球饲料霉菌毒素粘合剂市场（按畜牧业）

  • 家禽
  • 水产养殖
  • 猪
  • 宠物
  • 反刍动物
  • 其他牲畜

7. 全球饲料霉菌毒素粘合剂市场（按原始材料）

  • 有机的
  • 无机

8. 全球饲料霉菌毒素粘合剂市场（依形式）

  • 烘干
  • 液体

9. 全球饲料霉菌毒素粘合剂市场（依销售管道）

  • 直销
  • 间接销售

10. 全球饲料霉菌毒素粘合剂市场（按地区）

  • 北美洲
    • 美国
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 欧洲
    • 德国
    • 英国
    • 义大利
    • 法国
    • 西班牙
    • 其他欧洲国家
  • 亚太地区
    • 日本
    • 中国
    • 印度
    • 澳洲
    • 纽西兰
    • 韩国
    • 其他亚太地区
  • 南美洲
    • 阿根廷
    • 巴西
    • 智利
    • 南美洲其他地区
  • 中东和非洲
    • 沙乌地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公国
    • 卡达
    • 南非
    • 其他中东和非洲地区

第十一章：主要趋势

  • 合约、商业伙伴关係和合资企业
  • 企业合併（M&A）
  • 新产品发布
  • 业务扩展
  • 其他关键策略

第十二章 公司概况

  • Cargill, Incorporated
  • Selko
  • BASF SE
  • Orffa Additives BV
  • Kemin Industries, Inc.
  • Anpario plc
  • Adisseo
  • EW Nutrition GmbH
  • Alltech Inc.
  • Olmix Group
  • Novus International, Inc.
  • Impextraco NV
  • Biomin GmbH
  • Perstorp Holding AB
  • Nutreco NV
Product Code: SMRC31021

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market is accounted for $2.75 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $3.96 billion by 2032 growing at a CAGR of 5.3% during the forecast period. Feed mycotoxin binders and modifiers are feed additives used to safeguard animals from the negative impact of mycotoxins in their diets. Binders trap mycotoxins in the digestive tract, preventing absorption, while modifiers alter their chemical structure, reducing toxicity. By enhancing feed safety, these additives promote better animal health, growth, and productivity, while minimizing toxin-related risks, thereby contributing to higher efficiency and overall quality in livestock production systems.

According to the BIOMIN World Mycotoxin Survey, 2018, it has been stated that the risk associated with mycotoxin in North America was 73%, whereas in 2016 the risk was 66% for the same.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Increased demand for high-quality animal products

The growing consumer preference for premium meat, dairy, and poultry is fueling demand for feed additives that enhance animal health and productivity. Mycotoxin binders are increasingly viewed as essential for maintaining feed safety and ensuring optimal livestock performance. As producers aim to meet stricter quality standards, the role of binders in preventing toxin-related losses becomes more critical. Rising income levels and urbanization are also contributing to higher consumption of animal protein, especially in emerging economies. This shift is prompting feed manufacturers to invest in advanced formulations that support animal welfare and yield. The push for traceable, contamination-free food sources is reinforcing the adoption of mycotoxin mitigation strategies.

Restraint:

Lack of awareness among smaller livestock growers

Many small-scale farmers continue to depend on traditional feeding methods and have limited access to scientific knowledge, veterinary guidance, or modern feed technologies. This gap in awareness often results in poor adoption of mycotoxin management solutions, leading to reduced livestock productivity, higher disease susceptibility, and economic losses. Furthermore, inadequate government extension programs, limited training facilities, and insufficient promotion of advanced feed safety practices in rural and developing areas make it challenging to increase acceptance. This lack of awareness slows down the market's growth and prevents broader implementation of effective feed safety measures.

Opportunity:

Rise in demand for organic and natural binders

As the feed industry pivots toward sustainability, natural and organic mycotoxin binders are gaining traction. Consumers are increasingly scrutinizing the inputs used in animal production, driving interest in clean-label feed solutions. Plant-based and mineral-derived binders offer a compelling alternative to synthetic additives, aligning with organic certification standards. This trend is opening doors for innovation in binder formulations that balance efficacy with environmental compatibility. Regulatory support for natural feed ingredients is also encouraging manufacturers to expand their portfolios. The shift toward eco-friendly livestock production is creating fertile ground for growth in this niche.

Threat:

Competition from alternative feed additives

Products such as probiotics, enzymes, organic acids, and phytogenics are increasingly being adopted as cost-effective and multifunctional solutions for enhancing livestock health and productivity. These alternatives often provide broader benefits beyond mycotoxin mitigation, such as improving gut health, nutrient absorption, and immunity, making them attractive to farmers. Additionally, advancements in biotechnology and natural additive formulations are expanding their effectiveness, further challenging the market position of traditional mycotoxin binders and modifiers, thereby limiting their growth potential in highly competitive feed markets.

Covid-19 Impact

The pandemic disrupted supply chains and slowed feed production, temporarily affecting the distribution of mycotoxin binders. Lockdowns led to reduced livestock movement and delayed procurement cycles, especially in regions with stringent restrictions. However, the crisis also underscored the importance of feed safety in maintaining animal health during uncertain times. Essential sectors such as dairy and poultry continued operations, sustaining baseline demand for binders. As markets stabilized, renewed focus on biosecurity and resilience drove interest in protective feed additives. The pandemic ultimately highlighted the strategic role of binders in safeguarding food systems.

The mycotoxin binders segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The mycotoxin binders segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period, due to their critical role in mitigating feed contamination risks. Their effectiveness in neutralizing a wide range of toxins makes them indispensable across livestock categories. Producers increasingly view binders as a preventive investment rather than a reactive measure. Regulatory pressure to ensure feed safety is also driving consistent uptake. Innovations in binder composition are enhancing performance and broadening applicability. With rising awareness of mycotoxin-related losses, this segment is set to maintain its lead throughout the forecast period.

The indirect sales segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

Over the forecast period, the indirect sales segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate, as feed producers seek flexible procurement options. These channels offer broader geographic reach and cater to fragmented livestock markets more efficiently. Digitalization is enabling better product visibility and streamlined ordering processes. Small and mid-sized farms increasingly prefer indirect sourcing due to convenience and cost advantages. Strategic partnerships between manufacturers and resellers are further boosting channel strength. As rural connectivity improves, indirect sales are poised to accelerate faster than traditional direct models.

Region with largest share:

During the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is expected to hold the largest market share driven by its vast livestock population and expanding feed industry. Countries like China, India, and Vietnam are witnessing rising demand for animal protein, prompting investment in feed safety solutions. Government initiatives promoting livestock health and productivity are supporting binder adoption. The region's dense agricultural base and growing awareness of mycotoxin risks contribute to sustained demand. Local manufacturers are also scaling up production to meet domestic needs, enhancing market accessibility.

Region with highest CAGR:

Over the forecast period, the North America region is anticipated to exhibit the highest CAGR, fuelled by technological innovation and stringent regulatory standards. The region's emphasis on feed quality and traceability is encouraging adoption of advanced binder solutions. Rising demand from poultry and swine sectors, coupled with increasing organic feed production, is driving momentum. Manufacturers are leveraging R&D to develop high-performance binders tailored to regional needs. Digital platforms and robust distribution networks are enhancing market penetration.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players profiled in the Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market include Cargill Incorporated, Selko, BASF SE, Orffa Additives B.V., Kemin Industries, Inc., Anpario plc, Adisseo, EW Nutrition GmbH, Alltech Inc., Olmix Group, Novus International, Inc., Impextraco NV, Biomin GmbH, Perstorp Holding AB, and Nutreco N.V.

Key Developments:

In July 2025, Cargill announces its binding offer to acquire 100% of the operations of Mig-Plus, a family-owned company specializing in animal nutrition solutions for multiple species, primarily swine and ruminants, with a product portfolio that includes premixes, feed concentrates, and complete feeds.

In October 2020, DSM announces the completion of its acquisition of Erber Group for an enterprise value of €980 million. The transaction - which excludes two smaller units in the Erber Group - is expected to be earnings enhancing in the first year upon completion.

Product Types Covered:

  • Mycotoxin Binders
  • Mycotoxin Modifiers
  • Other Product Types

Livestock Covered:

  • Poultry
  • Aquaculture
  • Swine
  • Pets
  • Ruminants
  • Other Livestock

Sources Covered:

  • Organic
  • Inorganic

Forms Covered:

  • Dry
  • Liquid

Sales Channels Covered:

  • Direct Sales
  • Indirect Sales

Regions Covered:

  • North America
    • US
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • Italy
    • France
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • Japan
    • China
    • India
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • South America
    • Argentina
    • Brazil
    • Chile
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle East & Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • Qatar
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:

  • Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
  • Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
  • Covers Market data for the years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2028, and 2032
  • Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
  • Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
  • Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
  • Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
  • Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

  • Company Profiling
    • Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
    • SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
  • Regional Segmentation
    • Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
  • Competitive Benchmarking
    • Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

  • 2.1 Abstract
  • 2.2 Stake Holders
  • 2.3 Research Scope
  • 2.4 Research Methodology
    • 2.4.1 Data Mining
    • 2.4.2 Data Analysis
    • 2.4.3 Data Validation
    • 2.4.4 Research Approach
  • 2.5 Research Sources
    • 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
    • 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
    • 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis

  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Drivers
  • 3.3 Restraints
  • 3.4 Opportunities
  • 3.5 Threats
  • 3.6 Product Analysis
  • 3.7 Emerging Markets
  • 3.8 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

  • 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
  • 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
  • 4.3 Threat of substitutes
  • 4.4 Threat of new entrants
  • 4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market, By Product Type

  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Mycotoxin Binders
    • 5.2.1 Clay
    • 5.2.2 Bentonite
    • 5.2.3 Yeast Cell Wall
    • 5.2.4 Activated Charcoal
  • 5.3 Mycotoxin Modifiers
    • 5.3.1 Enzymes
    • 5.3.2 Yeasts
    • 5.3.3 Bacteria
  • 5.4 Other Product Types

6 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market, By Livestock

  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2 Poultry
  • 6.3 Aquaculture
  • 6.4 Swine
  • 6.5 Pets
  • 6.6 Ruminants
  • 6.7 Other Livestock

7 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market, By Source

  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 Organic
  • 7.3 Inorganic

8 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market, By Form

  • 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.2 Dry
  • 8.3 Liquid

9 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market, By Sales Channel

  • 9.1 Introduction
  • 9.2 Direct Sales
  • 9.3 Indirect Sales

10 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market, By Geography

  • 10.1 Introduction
  • 10.2 North America
    • 10.2.1 US
    • 10.2.2 Canada
    • 10.2.3 Mexico
  • 10.3 Europe
    • 10.3.1 Germany
    • 10.3.2 UK
    • 10.3.3 Italy
    • 10.3.4 France
    • 10.3.5 Spain
    • 10.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 10.4 Asia Pacific
    • 10.4.1 Japan
    • 10.4.2 China
    • 10.4.3 India
    • 10.4.4 Australia
    • 10.4.5 New Zealand
    • 10.4.6 South Korea
    • 10.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
  • 10.5 South America
    • 10.5.1 Argentina
    • 10.5.2 Brazil
    • 10.5.3 Chile
    • 10.5.4 Rest of South America
  • 10.6 Middle East & Africa
    • 10.6.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 10.6.2 UAE
    • 10.6.3 Qatar
    • 10.6.4 South Africa
    • 10.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

11 Key Developments

  • 11.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
  • 11.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
  • 11.3 New Product Launch
  • 11.4 Expansions
  • 11.5 Other Key Strategies

12 Company Profiling

  • 12.1 Cargill, Incorporated
  • 12.2 Selko
  • 12.3 BASF SE
  • 12.4 Orffa Additives B.V.
  • 12.5 Kemin Industries, Inc.
  • 12.6 Anpario plc
  • 12.7 Adisseo
  • 12.8 EW Nutrition GmbH
  • 12.9 Alltech Inc.
  • 12.10 Olmix Group
  • 12.11 Novus International, Inc.
  • 12.12 Impextraco NV
  • 12.13 Biomin GmbH
  • 12.14 Perstorp Holding AB
  • 12.15 Nutreco N.V.

List of Tables

  • Table 1 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Region (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 2 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Product Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 3 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Mycotoxin Binders (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 4 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Clay (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 5 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Bentonite (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 6 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Yeast Cell Wall (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 7 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Activated Charcoal (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 8 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Mycotoxin Modifiers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 9 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Enzymes (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 10 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Yeasts (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 11 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Bacteria (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 12 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Other Product Types (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 13 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Livestock (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 14 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Poultry (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 15 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Aquaculture (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 16 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Swine (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 17 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Pets (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 18 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Ruminants (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 19 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Other Livestock (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 20 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Source (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 21 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Organic (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 22 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Inorganic (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 23 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Form (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 24 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Dry (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 25 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Liquid (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 26 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Sales Channel (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 27 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Direct Sales (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 28 Global Feed Mycotoxin Binders Modifiers Market Outlook, By Indirect Sales (2024-2032) ($MN)

Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.