查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1833610

2032 年农业区块链市场预测：按组件、类型、组织规模、应用、最终用户和地区进行的全球分析

Agriculture Blockchain Market Forecasts to 2032 - Global Analysis By Component (Platform and Services), Type, Organization Size, Application, End User and By Geography
出版日期: | 出版商: Stratistics Market Research Consulting | 英文 200+ Pages | 商品交期: 2-3个工作天内

价格

根据 Stratistics MRC 的数据，全球农业区块链市场预计在 2025 年达到 11 亿美元，到 2032 年将达到 53 亿美元，预测期内的复合年增长率为 25.1%。

农业区块链市场利用分散式帐本技术来提高整个农业供应链的透明度、可追溯性和效率。其应用包括监控产品来源、减少诈欺、优化交易以及简化农民、经销商和零售商之间的支付流程。人们对食品安全、仿冒品和公平贸易行为日益增长的担忧，正在推动区块链的应用。该市场也受益于数位化、智慧合约和物联网整合的兴起。各国政府和相关企业正在探索利用区块链来提高农场收入、增强监管合规性以及消费者对食品真实性和品质的信心。

据世界银行称，肯亚和印度的区块链初步试验提高了一些供应链的可追溯性，并将收穫后损失减少了 20%。

提高供应链透明度

区块链主导的供应链透明度透过创建不可篡改、可靠的记录，追踪农产品从农场到餐桌的整个过程，从而改变农业价值链。这种可视性减少了生产商、加工商、经销商和零售商之间的资讯不对称，缩短了争议解决时间，并缩短了召回回应时间。此外，透明的帐本能够快速检验有机、公平贸易和永续性等认证，从而改善进入高端市场的管道，并增强消费者信任。可互通的平台进一步简化了审核，并减少了出口商和监管机构的文件处理摩擦。这些优势促进了更广泛的商业性利益和投资者信心。

数位素养有限

儘管区块链技术在营运方面具有明显的优势，但许多农业社群的数位素养有限，阻碍了其有效应用。许多农民不熟悉智慧型手机、数位钱包以及使用基于帐本的平台所需的简单资料输入程序，导致数据品质低下，参与率低。时断时续的连接和糟糕的现场培训加剧了这些障碍，将实施负担转嫁给了供应商和推广服务。如果没有客製化的支援和简洁的使用者介面，试点应用程式可能会降低采用率，并导致记录保存不一致。

政府措施和资金筹措

津贴、创新基金和研究计画透过承担初始成本、承保概念验证试点计画以及奖励官民合作关係，降低了新兴企业和小农户的财务风险。政府主导的监管沙盒和标准化工作促进了互通性和跨境认证，促进了贸易流动和合规性。这些措施也促进了标准化，鼓励了互通性，并吸引了那些如今需要规范透明的食品链的机构投资者。

网路安全风险

随着供应链日益互联互通和数据主导，网路安全风险对农业区块链部署构成了重大威胁。勒索软体、资料外洩、网路钓鱼和物联网攻击等威胁可能会破坏原产地记录、扰乱物流，并造成声誉损害，从而削弱买家和消费者的信心。规模较小的农产品通常缺乏成熟的网路实践和专用的IT资源，从而形成薄弱环节，威胁行为者可以利用这些环节扩大其对整个网路运作的影响。

COVID-19的影响：

新冠疫情揭露了农业供应链中原产地和物流的漏洞，加速了人们对区块链解决方案的兴趣。疫情的爆发促使相关人员试行分散式帐本，以实现更快的检验、非接触式交易和原产地追踪，但也凸显了营运和财务方面的限制，导致许多倡议停留在试点阶段。儘管如此，这场危机提高了相关人员的认识，并在互通性和握手流程方面累积了实务经验，为更切合实际的分阶段推广奠定了基础。

平台（软体/解决方案）部分预计将成为预测期内最大的部分

平台（软体/解决方案）领域预计将在预测期内占据最大的市场份额，因为平台将可追溯性、智慧合约自动化、物联网整合、分析和用户介面等必要功能打包成可部署的套件，以满足即时的市场需求。平台透过提供API、仪表板、中介软体和託管服务，将传统ERP与分散式帐本连接起来，从而降低整合复杂性，从而加快相关企业的价值实现速度。成功的供应商优先考虑以农民为中心的设计、多语言引导和清晰的资料管治模式。提供合规模块、模组化定价和本地支援的平台在各个产品类型和地区的采用率正在不断提高。

预计混合/联盟区块链部分在预测期内将以最高的复合年增长率成长。

混合/联盟区块链领域预计将在预测期内呈现最高成长率，因为这些模型在透明度与必要的隐私和管治之间取得了平衡。混合架构支援公开概念验证，同时将商业性敏感的交易细节保存在许可帐本中，以满足买家和监管机构的需求。联盟管治是指产业参与者共同定义通讯协定并运作节点，从而建立共用信任并减轻对单边控制的担忧。此类架构降低了协调成本，实现了互通性，同时加速了整个供应链的标准化，使其成为多相关利益者农业生态系统的可行成长选择。

占比最大的地区：

在预测期内，北美预计将占据最大的市场份额，这得益于其成熟的农业科技生态系统、大量的私人投资以及企业在食品和商品供应链中快速采用可追溯性解决方案。大型零售商和餐饮服务公司对法规合规性和品牌保证的可验证性要求很高，这促使供应商采用区块链平台。蓬勃发展的创业投资活动、活跃的标准组织、成熟的物联网网路以及广泛的试点部署提供了切实可行的用例，将推动该地区更广泛的商业性。

复合年增长率最高的地区：

在预测期内，欧洲地区预计将呈现最高的复合年增长率，这得益于积极的监管、永续性报告要求以及支持数位化和绿色转型的大量公共资金。用例和国家补贴正在鼓励试点将区块链与碳计量、认证计划和跨境追溯框架相结合，从而创建可扩展且受政策支持的用例。消费者对符合道德标准的食品的强劲需求、成员国之间加强的追溯法规以及协作标准化工作，正在为快速采用创造肥沃的条件。公私合作降低了技术风险，并吸引了大规模的私人投资，加速了各国的部署。

免费客製化服务：

此报告的订阅者可以使用以下免费自订选项之一：

  • 公司简介
    • 对最多三家其他市场公司进行全面分析
    • 主要企业的SWOT分析（最多3家公司）
  • 区域细分
    • 根据客户兴趣对主要国家进行的市场估计、预测和复合年增长率（註：基于可行性检查）
  • 竞争基准化分析
    • 根据产品系列、地理分布和策略联盟对主要企业基准化分析

目录

第一章执行摘要

第二章 前言

  • 概述
  • 相关利益者
  • 调查范围
  • 调查方法
    • 资料探勘
    • 数据分析
    • 数据检验
    • 研究途径
  • 研究材料
    • 主要研究资料
    • 次级研究资讯来源
    • 先决条件

第三章市场走势分析

  • 驱动程式
  • 抑制因素
  • 机会
  • 威胁
  • 应用分析
  • 最终用户分析
  • 新兴市场
  • COVID-19的影响

第四章 波特五力分析

  • 供应商的议价能力
  • 买方的议价能力
  • 替代品的威胁
  • 新进入者的威胁
  • 竞争对手之间的竞争

5. 全球农业区块链市场（按组成部分）

  • 平台（软体/解决方案）
    • 核心区块链平台
    • 去中心化应用程式（dApps）
  • 服务
    • 咨询与培训
    • 实施与整合
    • 支援和维护

6. 全球农业区块链市场类型

  • 私有区块链
  • 公共区块链
  • 混合/联盟区块链

7. 全球农业区块链市场（依组织规模）

  • 大公司
  • 小型企业

8. 全球农业区块链市场应用状况

  • 供应链管理
  • 智能合约和自动支付/结算
  • 管治,风险与合规管理
  • 农场管理以及作物和牲畜管理
  • 农业金融、保险和贷款
  • 土地所有权和登记

9. 全球农业区块链市场（以最终用户划分）

  • 农民和生产者
  • 食品加工商和製造商
  • 零售商和经销商
  • 政府和监管机构

第 10 章：全球农业区块链市场（按地区）

  • 北美洲
    • 美国
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 欧洲
    • 德国
    • 英国
    • 义大利
    • 法国
    • 西班牙
    • 其他欧洲国家
  • 亚太地区
    • 日本
    • 中国
    • 印度
    • 澳洲
    • 纽西兰
    • 韩国
    • 其他亚太地区
  • 南美洲
    • 阿根廷
    • 巴西
    • 智利
    • 其他南美
  • 中东和非洲
    • 沙乌地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公国
    • 卡达
    • 南非
    • 其他中东和非洲地区

第十一章 重大进展

  • 协议、伙伴关係、合作和合资企业
  • 收购与合併
  • 新产品发布
  • 业务扩展
  • 其他关键策略

第 12 章：公司概况

  • IBM（IBM Food Trust）
  • TE-FOOD
  • Ripe.io
  • AgriDigital
  • GrainChain
  • Ambrosus
  • Bext360
  • Provenance
  • OriginTrail
  • BanQu
  • AgriLedger
  • TraceX Technologies
  • AgUnity
  • Skuchain
  • ChainPoint（now part of Source Intelligence）
  • FoodLogiQ
Product Code: SMRC31443

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Agriculture Blockchain Market is accounted for $1.1 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $5.3 billion by 2032 growing at a CAGR of 25.1% during the forecast period. The Agriculture Blockchain Market leverages distributed ledger technology to enhance transparency, traceability, and efficiency across agricultural supply chains. Applications include monitoring product origin, reducing fraud, optimizing trade, and streamlining payments between farmers, distributors, and retailers. Increasing concerns over food safety, counterfeit products, and fair trade practices are fueling blockchain adoption. The market also benefits from rising digitalization, smart contracts, and IoT integration. Governments and agribusinesses are exploring blockchain to improve farmer income, regulatory compliance, and consumer trust in food authenticity and quality.

According to the World Bank, blockchain pilots in Kenya and India have improved traceability and reduced post-harvest losses by 20% in select supply chains.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Enhanced Supply Chain Transparency

Blockchain-driven supply chain transparency transforms agricultural value chains by creating immutable provenance records that trace produce from farm to fork. This visibility reduces informational asymmetry among growers, processors, distributors, and retailers, cutting dispute-resolution time and shortening recall responses. Moreover, transparent ledgers enable rapid verification of certifications such as organic, fair-trade, and sustainability claims, improving access to premium markets and strengthening consumer trust. Interoperable platforms further streamline audits and reduce documentation friction for exporters and regulators. These gains drive broader commercial interest and investor confidence.

Restraint:

Limited Digital Literacy

Limited digital literacy across many farming communities constrains effective blockchain adoption despite clear operational benefits. Many producers lack familiarity with smartphones, digital wallets, and simple data-entry procedures required to use ledger-based platforms, which reduces data quality and participation. Intermittent connectivity and scarce local training amplify these hurdles and shift onboarding burdens onto vendors and extension services. Without tailored support and simple user interfaces, pilots risk low retention and inconsistent records.

Opportunity:

Government Initiatives and Funding

Grants, innovation funds, and research programmes defray upfront costs, underwrite proof-of-concept pilots, and incentivise public-private partnerships that reduce financial risk for startups and smallholders. Regulatory sandboxes and standards work promoted by governments accelerate interoperability and cross-border certification, smoothing trade flows and compliance. Such instruments also foster standardisation, encourage interoperability, and attract institutional investors seeking regulated, transparent food chains today.

Threat:

Cybersecurity Risks

Cybersecurity risks pose a material threat to agriculture blockchain deployments as supply chains become increasingly connected and data-driven. Threats such as ransomware, data breaches, phishing, and IoT exploitation can corrupt provenance records, disrupt logistics, and inflict reputational damage that erodes buyer and consumer confidence. Smaller agribusinesses often lack mature cyber practices and dedicated IT resources, creating weak links that threat actors can exploit to amplify operational impacts across networks.

Covid-19 Impact:

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated interest in blockchain solutions by exposing fragilities in provenance and logistics across agricultural supply chains. Disruptions pushed stakeholders to pilot distributed ledgers for faster verification, contactless transactions, and origin tracing, while also highlighting operational and funding constraints that kept many initiatives at pilot stage. Nonetheless, the crisis increased stakeholder awareness, produced practical lessons about interoperability and handshake processes, and informed more pragmatic phased deployments.

The platform (Software/Solutions) segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The platform (Software/Solutions) segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period because platforms package required capabilities traceability, smart-contract automation, IoT integration, analytics, and user interfaces into deployable suites that meet immediate market needs. Platforms reduce integration complexity by providing APIs, dashboards, middleware, and managed services that connect legacy ERPs with distributed ledgers, accelerating time-to-value for agribusinesses. Successful vendors prioritise farmer-centric design, multilingual onboarding, and clear data-governance models. Platforms that offer compliance modules, modular pricing, and local support expand adoption across commodity types and regions.

The hybrid/consortium blockchain segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

Over the forecast period, the hybrid/consortium blockchain segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate because these models reconcile transparency with necessary privacy and governance. Hybrid architectures allow public proof of provenance while keeping commercially sensitive transactional details on permissioned ledgers, meeting buyer and regulatory needs. Consortium governance, where industry participants jointly define protocols and operate nodes, build shared trust and reduces unilateral control concerns. Such structures lower coordination costs and accelerates standards across supply chains while enabling interoperability, making them a pragmatic growth choice for multi-stakeholder agricultural ecosystems.

Region with largest share:

During the forecast period, the North America region is expected to hold the largest market share owing to a mature agri-tech ecosystem, deep private investment, and rapid enterprise adoption of traceability solutions across food and commodity supply chains. Large retailers and foodservice companies demand provenance for regulatory compliance and brand assurance, prompting suppliers to implement blockchain-enabled platforms. Vigorous venture capital activity, active standards organisations, established IoT networks, and extensive pilot deployments provide practical use cases that encourage wider commercial uptake in the region.

Region with highest CAGR:

Over the forecast period, the Europe region is anticipated to exhibit the highest CAGR driven by proactive regulation, sustainability reporting mandates, and substantial public funding that supports digital and green transitions. EU programmes and national grants incentivise pilots linking blockchain to carbon accounting, certification schemes, and cross-border traceability frameworks, creating policy-backed use cases that can scale. Strong consumer demand for ethically sourced food, tightening traceability rules across member states, and cooperative standardisation efforts create fertile conditions for rapid uptake. Public-private collaborations reduce technical risk and attract private investment at scale, thereby accelerating deployments among nations.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players in Agriculture Blockchain Market include IBM (IBM Food Trust), TE-FOOD, Ripe.io, AgriDigital, GrainChain, Ambrosus, Bext360, Provenance, OriginTrail, BanQu, AgriLedger, TraceX Technologies, AgUnity, Skuchain, ChainPoint (now part of Source Intelligence), and FoodLogiQ.

Key Developments:

In September 2024, they expanded their partnership with THG Beauty (LOOKFANTASTIC, Dermstore brands) to integrate their platform for verified sustainability claims.

In February 2024, BanQu announced that they had secured a EU patent allowing their blockchain platform to encrypt and store identity information (farmers, waste collectors, etc.) and asset transaction data.

In September 2023, IBM and iFoodDS publicly launched "iFoodDS Trace Exchange with IBM Food Trust", intended to help food companies comply with the FDA's FSMA 204 traceability rule by combining IBM's blockchain network with iFoodDS's traceability applications.

Components Covered:

  • Platform (Software/Solutions)
  • Services

Types Covered:

  • Private Blockchain
  • Public Blockchain
  • Hybrid/Consortium Blockchain

Organization Sizes Covered:

  • Large Enterprises
  • Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs)

Applications Covered:

  • Supply Chain Management
  • Smart Contracts and Automated Payments/Settlements
  • Governance, Risk, and Compliance Management
  • Farming Operations and Crop/Livestock Management
  • Agricultural Finance, Insurance, and Lending
  • Land Ownership and Registry

End Users Covered:

  • Farmers and Producers
  • Food Processors and Manufacturers
  • Retailers and Distributors
  • Government and Regulatory Bodies

Regions Covered:

  • North America
    • US
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • Italy
    • France
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • Japan
    • China
    • India
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • South America
    • Argentina
    • Brazil
    • Chile
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle East & Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • Qatar
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:

  • Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
  • Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
  • Covers Market data for the years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2028, and 2032
  • Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
  • Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
  • Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
  • Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
  • Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

  • Company Profiling
    • Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
    • SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
  • Regional Segmentation
    • Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
  • Competitive Benchmarking
    • Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

  • 2.1 Abstract
  • 2.2 Stake Holders
  • 2.3 Research Scope
  • 2.4 Research Methodology
    • 2.4.1 Data Mining
    • 2.4.2 Data Analysis
    • 2.4.3 Data Validation
    • 2.4.4 Research Approach
  • 2.5 Research Sources
    • 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
    • 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
    • 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis

  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Drivers
  • 3.3 Restraints
  • 3.4 Opportunities
  • 3.5 Threats
  • 3.6 Application Analysis
  • 3.7 End User Analysis
  • 3.8 Emerging Markets
  • 3.9 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

  • 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
  • 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
  • 4.3 Threat of substitutes
  • 4.4 Threat of new entrants
  • 4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market, By Component

  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Platform (Software/Solutions)
    • 5.2.1 Core Blockchain Platforms
    • 5.2.2 Decentralized Applications (dApps)
  • 5.3 Services
    • 5.3.1 Consulting and Training
    • 5.3.2 Implementation and Integration
    • 5.3.3 Support and Maintenance

6 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market, By Type

  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2 Private Blockchain
  • 6.3 Public Blockchain
  • 6.4 Hybrid/Consortium Blockchain

7 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market, By Organization Size

  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 Large Enterprises
  • 7.3 Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs)

8 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market, By Application

  • 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.2 Supply Chain Management
  • 8.3 Smart Contracts and Automated Payments/Settlements
  • 8.4 Governance, Risk, and Compliance Management
  • 8.5 Farming Operations and Crop/Livestock Management
  • 8.6 Agricultural Finance, Insurance, and Lending
  • 8.7 Land Ownership and Registry

9 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market, By End User

  • 9.1 Introduction
  • 9.2 Farmers and Producers
  • 9.3 Food Processors and Manufacturers
  • 9.4 Retailers and Distributors
  • 9.5 Government and Regulatory Bodies

10 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market, By Geography

  • 10.1 Introduction
  • 10.2 North America
    • 10.2.1 US
    • 10.2.2 Canada
    • 10.2.3 Mexico
  • 10.3 Europe
    • 10.3.1 Germany
    • 10.3.2 UK
    • 10.3.3 Italy
    • 10.3.4 France
    • 10.3.5 Spain
    • 10.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 10.4 Asia Pacific
    • 10.4.1 Japan
    • 10.4.2 China
    • 10.4.3 India
    • 10.4.4 Australia
    • 10.4.5 New Zealand
    • 10.4.6 South Korea
    • 10.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
  • 10.5 South America
    • 10.5.1 Argentina
    • 10.5.2 Brazil
    • 10.5.3 Chile
    • 10.5.4 Rest of South America
  • 10.6 Middle East & Africa
    • 10.6.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 10.6.2 UAE
    • 10.6.3 Qatar
    • 10.6.4 South Africa
    • 10.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

11 Key Developments

  • 11.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
  • 11.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
  • 11.3 New Product Launch
  • 11.4 Expansions
  • 11.5 Other Key Strategies

12 Company Profiling

  • 12.1 IBM (IBM Food Trust)
  • 12.2 TE-FOOD
  • 12.3 Ripe.io
  • 12.4 AgriDigital
  • 12.5 GrainChain
  • 12.6 Ambrosus
  • 12.7 Bext360
  • 12.8 Provenance
  • 12.9 OriginTrail
  • 12.10 BanQu
  • 12.11 AgriLedger
  • 12.12 TraceX Technologies
  • 12.13 AgUnity
  • 12.14 Skuchain
  • 12.15 ChainPoint (now part of Source Intelligence)
  • 12.16 FoodLogiQ

List of Tables

  • Table 1 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Region (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 2 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Component (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 3 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Platform (Software/Solutions) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 4 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Core Blockchain Platforms (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 5 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Decentralized Applications (dApps) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 6 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Services (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 7 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Consulting and Training (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 8 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Implementation and Integration (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 9 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Support and Maintenance (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 10 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 11 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Private Blockchain (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 12 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Public Blockchain (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 13 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Hybrid/Consortium Blockchain (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 14 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Organization Size (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 15 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Large Enterprises (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 16 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 17 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Application (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 18 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Supply Chain Management (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 19 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Smart Contracts and Automated Payments/Settlements (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 20 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Governance, Risk, and Compliance Management (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 21 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Farming Operations and Crop/Livestock Management (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 22 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Agricultural Finance, Insurance, and Lending (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 23 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Land Ownership and Registry (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 24 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By End User (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 25 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Farmers and Producers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 26 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Food Processors and Manufacturers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 27 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Retailers and Distributors (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 28 Global Agriculture Blockchain Market Outlook, By Government and Regulatory Bodies (2024-2032) ($MN)

Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.