![]() |
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1857020
全球生物多样性审核市场:预测至2032年-按类型、服务类型、最终使用者和地区分類的分析Biodiversity Audit Market Forecasts to 2032 - Global Analysis By Type (Baseline Biodiversity Audits, Impact Assessment Audits, Monitoring & Compliance Audits, Restoration & Offset Audits and Other Types), Service Type, End User and By Geography |
||||||
根据 Stratistics MRC 的数据,预计 2025 年全球生物多样性审核市场规模将达到 3.309 亿美元,到 2032 年将达到 9.408 亿美元,预测期内复合年增长率将达到 16.1%。
生物多样性审核是对特定区域内物种多样性和丰度进行系统性评估,旨在评估生态系统健康状况和确定保育优先事项。它对植物、动物和栖息地进行编目,并识别变化、威胁和恢復机会。此类审核通常由环境专业人员进行,有助于遵守永续性法规,为土地利用规划提供信息,并指南生物多样性管理策略。该过程透过提供基准数据和追踪生物多样性保护的进展情况,确保决策的准确性。
《工业生态学杂誌》上的一项研究发现,生物多样性风险暴露与审核费用之间存在正相关关係。该研究使用基于对 10-K 财务报表进行文字分析的公司特定生物多样性风险指标。
全球范围内日益重要的指令,例如欧盟生物多样性战略和自然相关财务资讯揭露工作小组(TNFD)
生物多样性审核市场的发展受到欧盟生物多样性战略和自然相关财务资讯揭露工作小组(TNFD)等严格的全球性法规的推动。这些框架要求企业评估并揭露与生物多样性相关的风险,使审核成为一项合规要求。此外,生物多样性指标正逐渐成为环境、社会和治理(ESG)报告的重要组成部分,促使企业采用结构化的审核通讯协定。这种转变在生态足迹较大的行业尤其明显,这些产业正利用生物多样性审核来指导永续土地利用、供应链韧性和相关人员透明度。
缺乏统一的审核通讯协定和生物多样性指标
儘管市场对生物多样性审计的兴趣日益浓厚,但由于缺乏标准化的审核方法和生物多样性指标,该市场仍面临许多挑战。这种不统一性使得基准化分析和跨部门对比变得复杂。此外,生物多样性审核通常需要多学科专业知识、实地调查和进阶资料建模,这对中小企业而言成本可能过高。收集和解读生态系统数据的复杂性进一步限制了扩充性,尤其是在生物多样性专家和数位基础设施匮乏的地区。
基础设施、旅游和金融等领域的成长潜力
技术创新,特别是人工智慧、遥感探测和基于环境DNA的监测技术,正在透过提高准确性和降低营运成本,彻底改变生物多样性评估方式。这些工具能够实现即时栖息地测绘和物种追踪,使审核更加便捷可行。此外,企业自愿承诺采取有利于环境保护的策略,正在推动相关技术的应用超越监管要求,尤其是在註重环境、社会和治理(ESG)的投资者和全球品牌中。
物种资料和栖地分布图不完整
不准确的评估可能导致错误的保护策略,并使公司面临声誉损害。此外,缺乏生态学严谨性的表面审核可能被视为「绿色清洗」,从而削弱相关人员的信任。某些地区的政治不稳定和环境政策波动可能对长期生物多样性保护措施构成风险,并阻碍审核的进行和资金筹措。
新冠疫情对生物多样性审核市场产生了双重影响。一方面,由于封锁和旅行限制,现场生态学调查被迫暂停;另一方面,疫情也提高了人们对生态系统健康和通用感染疾病风险的认识。这促使企业更加重视将生物多样性监测纳入风险管理和永续性规划。疫情期间,遥感探测和数位化审核工具的普及加速了向高科技生物多样性解决方案的转型,使得即使在物理条件受限的情况下也能进行持续评估。
预计在预测期内,影响评估审核将成为最大的细分市场。
预计在预测期内,影响评估审核领域将占据最大的市场份额,因为它在监管合规和生态风险评估中发挥着至关重要的作用。基础设施、采矿和工业计划必须进行此类审核,以便在开发开始前评估其对当地生态系统的潜在影响。它们是环境许可的基本工具,有助于相关人员制定缓解策略并与保护目标保持一致。
预计在预测期内,eDNA 和基因监测服务领域将达到最高的复合年增长率。
在预测期内,环境DNA和基因监测服务领域预计将实现最高成长率,这主要得益于无需进行物理监测或侵入性取样即可透过环境DNA痕迹检测物种存在的能力。这些先进技术具有高灵敏度和特异性,即使在偏远和敏感的栖息地也能快速进行生物多样性评估。其应用范围涵盖保育生物学、生态学修復和法医学环境调查等领域。
预计在预测期内,北美将占据最大的市场份额,这得益于其成熟的监管体系和强大的生态学监测机构能力。该地区受益于完善的框架,例如《濒危物种法案》和《国家环境政策法案》,这些法案强制要求对各种开发活动进行生物多样性评估。此外,将生物多样性指标纳入企业ESG资讯揭露正在加速各产业采用生物审核。
预计亚太地区在预测期内将呈现最高的复合年增长率,这主要受生物多样性威胁加剧以及各国政府日益重视生态系统永续性的推动。印度、中国和印尼等国的快速都市化、森林砍伐和工业扩张,使得进行生物多样性审核以缓解环境退化变得特别迫切。区域各国政府正在投资生态恢復计画和生物多样性测绘工作,而国际资金和伙伴关係则为能力建构工作提供支援。
According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Biodiversity Audit Market is accounted for $330.9 million in 2025 and is expected to reach $940.8 million by 2032 growing at a CAGR of 16.1% during the forecast period. Biodiversity audit is a systematic evaluation of the variety and abundance of species within a defined area, aimed at assessing ecological health and conservation priorities. It involves cataloging flora, fauna, and habitats to identify changes, threats, and opportunities for restoration. Typically conducted by environmental professionals, such audits support compliance with sustainability regulations, inform land-use planning, and guide biodiversity management strategies. The process ensures informed decision-making by providing baseline data and tracking progress over time in preserving biological diversity.
According to Journal of Industrial EcologyUsing a firm-specific biodiversity risk measure based on textual analyses of 10-K statements, researchers found a positive association between biodiversity risk exposure and audit fees, indicating that firms with higher biodiversity-related risks tend to incur greater audit costs.
Rising global mandates like the EU Biodiversity Strategy and Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD)
The biodiversity audit market is being propelled by stringent global mandates such as the EU Biodiversity Strategy and the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD). These frameworks compel organizations to assess and disclose biodiversity-related risks, making audits a compliance necessity. Additionally, biodiversity metrics are becoming integral to ESG reporting, prompting corporations to adopt structured audit protocols. This shift is especially evident in sectors with high ecological footprints, where biodiversity audits are used to inform sustainable land use, supply chain resilience, and stakeholder transparency.
Absence of unified audit protocols and biodiversity metrics
Despite growing interest, the market faces challenges due to the absence of standardized audit methodologies and biodiversity indicators. This lack of uniformity complicates benchmarking and cross-sector comparisons. Moreover, biodiversity audits often require multidisciplinary expertise, field surveys, and advanced data modeling, which can be cost-prohibitive for small and mid-sized enterprises. The complexity of ecological data collection and interpretation further limits scalability, especially in regions with limited access to biodiversity specialists and digital infrastructure.
Growth potential in sectors like infrastructure, tourism, and finance
Technological innovations particularly in AI, remote sensing, and eDNA-based monitoring are revolutionizing biodiversity assessments by improving accuracy and reducing operational costs. These tools enable real-time habitat mapping and species tracking, making audits more accessible and actionable. Additionally, voluntary corporate commitments to nature-positive strategies are driving adoption beyond regulatory requirements, especially among ESG-conscious investors and global brands.
Incomplete species data and habitat mapping
Inaccurate assessments can lead to flawed conservation strategies and expose companies to reputational damage. Furthermore, superficial audits lacking ecological rigor may be perceived as greenwashing, undermining stakeholder trust. Political instability and fluctuating environmental policies in certain regions also pose risks to long-term biodiversity initiatives, potentially stalling audit adoption and funding.
The COVID-19 pandemic had a dual impact on the biodiversity audit market. While field-based ecological surveys were temporarily disrupted due to lockdowns and travel restrictions, the crisis also heightened awareness of ecosystem health and zoonotic risks. This led to increased interest in biodiversity monitoring as part of corporate risk management and sustainability planning. Remote sensing and digital audit tools gained traction during this period, enabling continued assessments despite physical constraints and accelerating the shift toward tech-enabled biodiversity solutions.
The impact assessment audits segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period
The impact assessment audits segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period owing to their indispensable role in regulatory compliance and ecological risk evaluation. These audits are mandated across infrastructure, mining, and industrial projects to assess potential impacts on local ecosystems before development begins. They serve as a foundational tool for environmental clearance, helping stakeholders identify mitigation strategies and align with conservation goals.
The eDNA & genetic monitoring services segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period
Over the forecast period, the eDNA & genetic monitoring services segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate driven by their ability to detect species presence through environmental DNA traces without requiring physical sightings or invasive sampling. These advanced techniques offer high sensitivity and specificity, enabling rapid biodiversity assessments even in remote or sensitive habitats. Their application is expanding across conservation biology, ecological restoration, and forensic environmental investigations.
During the forecast period, the North America region is expected to hold the largest market share supported by a mature regulatory landscape and strong institutional capacity for ecological research. The region benefits from well-established frameworks such as the Endangered Species Act and the National Environmental Policy Act, which mandate biodiversity assessments for various development activities. Additionally, the integration of biodiversity metrics into corporate ESG disclosures is accelerating audit adoption across industries.
Over the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is anticipated to exhibit the highest CAGR propelled by escalating biodiversity threats and increasing governmental focus on ecological sustainability. Rapid urbanization, deforestation, and industrial expansion in countries like India, China, and Indonesia have intensified the need for biodiversity audits to mitigate environmental degradation. Regional governments are investing in restoration programs and biodiversity mapping initiatives, while international funding and partnerships are supporting capacity-building efforts.
Key players in the market
Some of the key players in Biodiversity Audit Market include The Biodiversity Consultancy Ltd, NatureMetrics, EcoMetrix Solutions Group, Earthwatch Institute, IBAT Alliance, ERM (Environmental Resources Management), IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Fauna & Flora International, Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), WWF Biodiversity Risk Filter, Biodiversify Ltd, EcoAct (an Atos company), Biotope, South Pole, Nature Positive, and Conservation International.
In September 2025, NatureMetrics launched new AI-powered tool to help global corporations assess nature risk across entire site portfolios". The company released "Portfolio Assessment", a first-of-its-kind dashboard feature enabling enterprises to monitor biodiversity risk across all their sites.
In July 2025, The IBAT Alliance announced that its 2024 investment in biodiversity data reached USD 2.5 million (up from USD 1.2 million in 2023). This funding supports critical global datasets: the World Database on Protected Areas, IUCN Red List, and the World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas.
In January 2025, NatureMetrics announced a successful Series B raise of US $25 million to scale its biodiversity intelligence platform, leveraging eDNA and AI technologies. The investment round was led by Just Climate, EDF Pulse Ventures and the ReOcean Fund, with existing backers participating.
Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.