封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1871881

全球开放式无线接取网路与云端原生网路市场:未来预测(至2032年)-依产品、部署环境、网路类型、架构、功能层、最终用户和区域进行分析

Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Forecasts to 2032 - Global Analysis By Offering, Deployment Environment, Network Type, Architecture, Functional Layer, End User and By Geography

出版日期: | 出版商: Stratistics Market Research Consulting | 英文 200+ Pages | 商品交期: 2-3个工作天内

价格

根据 Stratistics MRC 的一项研究,预计到 2025 年,全球开放式无线接取网路和云端原生网路市场价值将达到 62 亿美元,到 2032 年将达到 590.9 亿美元,在预测期内复合年增长率将达到 38.0%。

开放式无线接取网路 (Open RAN) 和云端原生网路正在改变通讯系统,使行动网路更加软体定义、模组化和厂商无关。开放式无线存取网使不同公司的硬体和软体能够透过标准化介面协同工作,从而降低对单一厂商的依赖。结合云端原生原则,网路功能运行在轻量级容器上,透过自动化编配实现快速扩展和持续更新。这种模式提高了灵活性,加快了服务交付速度,并优化了营运成本。此外,它还能更好地满足 5G主导的应用场景,例如物联网连接、工业自动化、企业专用网路和边缘应用。

根据 IBM 商业价值研究院(与 GSMA Intelligence 合作)的数据,通讯服务供应商中 27% 的网路功能现在託管在公共云端上。

降低供应商锁定和实施成本

开放式无线接取网路/云端原生网路市场的发展主要受业界降低厂商垄断和减少基础设施部署成本的趋势所驱动。传统的无线存取网模式限制了网路的选择自由,使其依赖少数几家成熟厂商的专有系统。开放式无线存取网透过支援标准化的开放介面克服了这项挑战,使不同厂商的硬体和软体能够互通。云端原生部署将功能迁移到虚拟化环境中,无需昂贵的专有设备,并简化了升级流程。这种组合降低了资本和营运成本,促进了价格竞争,并加速了技术进步。此外,它还赋予通讯业者在建立和扩展网路方面更大的灵活性。

整合复杂性和互通性挑战

整合仍然是阻碍开放式无线存取网路(Open RAN)和云端原生网路普及应用的最大障碍之一。虽然开放标准促进了跨厂商相容性,但要实现稳定的端到端效能,需要深度协作、严格的互通性测试和持续最佳化。许多通讯业者不熟悉如何管理不同的供应商,这使得诊断和维护比完全由单一供应商管理的传统系统更加复杂。故障难以归咎,支援流程也十分冗长。这增加了部署成本并延缓了上线计划。由于这种复杂性,一些营运商仍然依赖专有的整合基础设施,限制了开放式和虚拟化解决方案大规模商业化应用的速度。

扩大遍远地区的网路连接和低成本部署

在遍远地区不断扩展的通讯网路中,开放式无线存取网路(Open RAN)和云端原生部署蕴藏着巨大的市场机会。传统通讯设备在偏远高成本维护成本高昂且难度高,使得建置高容量网路成为一项巨大的财务挑战。开放式和虚拟化架构使营运商能够利用低成本的商用硬体和白盒无线电设备来降低成本。云端原生自动化实现了集中监控和远端故障排除,从而减轻了营运负担。许多政府正在推广开放式、厂商中立的网络,作为其宽频和连接倡议的一部分。透过在服务欠缺地区实现经济实惠的4G和5G部署,开放式无线接取网路不仅创造了新的收入成长潜力,也有助于弥合城乡数位落差。

熟练人员短缺和营运风险增加

专业人才短缺对开放式无线接取网路 (Open RAN) 和云端原生部署的商业性成功构成重大威胁。通讯业者团队传统上管理基于硬体的网络,而开放式和虚拟化生态系统则需要云端管理、DevOps 工作流程、自动化工具和容器编排管理等方面的新技能。缺乏专业知识会增加配置错误、故障排除延迟和长时间中断的风险。小规模业者可能更加依赖外部顾问,从而增加成本和营运复杂性。网路可靠性维护的困难可能会削弱市场信心并延缓采用。随着网路规模的扩大,技能差距将更加突出,因此技术准备是成功采用开放式架构的关键因素。

新冠疫情的影响:

新冠疫情对开放式无线接取网路(Open RAN)和云端原生网路产业产生了正面和负面的双重影响。初期,旅行限制和组件短缺导致设备供应、整合和现场部署延迟。然而,数位服务、远端连线和云端使用量的快速成长促使营运商升级网路容量和自动化程度。在人力资源有限的情况下,云端原生功能和远端编配的价值日益凸显,减少了对现场部署的依赖。此外,一些政府和企业从安全性和弹性角度出发,致力于通讯系统的多元化,从而推动了对开放式无线存取网的关注。儘管部署暂时有所延迟,但新冠疫情加速了虚拟化、可扩展、以软体为中心的网路模型的长期应用。

预计在预测期内,私有云端接入网(RAN)细分市场将占据最大的市场份额。

预计在预测期内,私有云端存取网(RAN)领域将占据最大的市场份额,因为营运商寻求的是最大程度的控制、安全性和专属属性。透过在自管理的基础架构上运作虚拟化的RAN功能,通讯业者可以维持严格的可靠性水准并保护核心网路流量。由于无需与第三方云端共用环境,通讯业者可以自订配置、最佳化资源并加强内部管治。私有平台也有助于确保一致的延迟、系统稳定性和端到端的可视性。对于大规模商业部署而言,这种模式被认为更可靠,更符合传统的网路营运实践,目前已成为首选的部署方案。

预计在预测期内,企业细分市场将实现最高的复合年增长率。

预计在预测期内,企业级市场将保持最高的成长率,这主要得益于专用无线系统和进阶自动化需求的持续成长。工厂、港口、医院和能源设施等行业需要可靠的连接来支援机器、感测器和关键任务应用。开放式无线存取网路 (Open RAN) 提高了客製化程度和供应商灵活性,而云端原生设计则透过自动化和远端控制简化了管理。这些优势降低了营运复杂性,并支援不依赖专有硬体的可扩展部署。随着企业不断扩展其数位化运营,安全、低延迟的连接至关重要,这促使企业采用开放式和虚拟化的网路模型。因此,企业级市场是市场上成长潜力最大的领域。

占比最大的地区:

预计亚太地区将在整个预测期内保持最大的市场份额,这主要得益于政府主导的重大倡议、5G网路的快速建设以及日本、韩国、印度和中国等国通讯业者的早期采用。该地区的通讯业者正在加速采用开放式无线接取网路和虚拟化、云端原生系统,以满足激增的行动流量和低延迟应用的需求。凭藉广泛的供应商生态系统、监管支援以及行动用户的大规模成长,亚太地区在开放式无线存取网和云端原生无线存取网基础设施的商业化方面处于领先地位,巩固了其作为该市场最大区域贡献者的地位。

复合年增长率最高的地区:

预计北美地区在预测期内将实现最高的复合年增长率。美国和加拿大的通讯业者比其他地区更积极地推动以软体为中心和分散式无线接取网路( RAN)的部署。成熟的云端平台、大规模的边缘运算、对开放生态系统的监管支援以及强劲的5G部署活动共同推动了这项加速普及。凭藉在虚拟化、编配和多厂商采购方面的强大能力,该地区的供应商和营运商正在快速采用开放式RAN架构和容器化网路功能。由于营运商对经济高效、灵活且动态的网路的需求日益增长,预计北美地区将实现全球最高的成长率。

免费客製化服务

订阅本报告的用户可从以下免费自订选项中选择一项:

  • 公司简介
    • 对最多三家其他公司进行全面分析
    • 对主要企业进行SWOT分析(最多3家公司)
  • 区域分类
    • 根据客户兴趣对主要国家进行市场估算、预测和复合年增长率分析(註:基于可行性检查)
  • 竞争基准化分析
    • 基于产品系列、地域覆盖和策略联盟对主要企业基准化分析

目录

第一章执行摘要

第二章 引言

  • 概述
  • 相关利益者
  • 分析范围
  • 分析方法
  • 分析材料

第三章 市场趋势分析

  • 介绍
  • 司机
  • 抑制因素
  • 市场机会
  • 威胁
  • 终端用户分析
  • 新兴市场
  • 新冠疫情的感染疾病

第四章 波特五力分析

  • 供应商的议价能力
  • 买方议价能力
  • 替代产品的威胁
  • 新参与企业的威胁
  • 公司间的竞争

第五章 全球开放式无线接取网路和云端原生网路市场(依产品/服务划分)

  • 介绍
  • 分散式硬体
  • 云端原生软体
  • 整合和託管服务

6. 全球开放式无线接取网路和云端原生网路市场(依部署环境划分)

  • 介绍
  • 公共云端接取网
  • 私有云端存取网
  • 混合云端存取网

7. 全球开放式无线接取网路和云端原生网路市场(依网路类型划分)

  • 介绍
  • 4G/LTE无线区域网
  • 5G无线区域网
  • Wi-Fi 6/7

8. 全球开放式无线接取网路和云端原生网路市场(依架构划分)

  • 介绍
  • 虚拟化无线存取网(vRAN)
  • Open RAN
  • 云端原生无线上网

9. 全球开放式无线接取网路及云端原生网路市场依功能层划分

  • 介绍
  • 控制与编配
  • 安全功能
  • 边缘运算集成

第十章:全球开放式无线接取网路和云端原生网路市场(依最终用户划分)

  • 介绍
  • 通讯业者
  • 公司
  • 政府/国防

第十一章 全球开放式无线接取网路和云端原生网路市场(按地区划分)

  • 介绍
  • 北美洲
    • 美国
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 欧洲
    • 德国
    • 英国
    • 义大利
    • 法国
    • 西班牙
    • 其他欧洲
  • 亚太地区
    • 日本
    • 中国
    • 印度
    • 澳洲
    • 纽西兰
    • 韩国
    • 亚太其他地区
  • 南美洲
    • 阿根廷
    • 巴西
    • 智利
    • 其他南美洲国家
  • 中东和非洲
    • 沙乌地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公国
    • 卡达
    • 南非
    • 其他中东和非洲地区

第十二章:主要趋势

  • 合约、商业伙伴关係和合资企业
  • 企业合併(M&A)
  • 新产品发布
  • 业务拓展
  • 其他关键策略

第十三章:公司简介

  • Ericsson
  • Mavenir
  • Nokia
  • Parallel Wireless
  • Samsung
  • NEC Corporation
  • Fujitsu
  • Intel Corporation
  • Qualcomm
  • VMware
  • Dell Technologies
  • Hewlett Packard Enterprise(HPE)
  • IBM
  • Rakuten Symphony
  • Cisco
Product Code: SMRC32251

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market is accounted for $6.20 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $59.09 billion by 2032 growing at a CAGR of 38.0% during the forecast period. Open RAN and cloud-native networking are transforming the telecom ecosystem by making mobile networks more software-defined, modular, and vendor-agnostic. Open RAN allows different companies' hardware and software to work together through standardized interfaces, reducing reliance on single suppliers. When layered with cloud-native principles, network functions run in lightweight containers, orchestrated through automation for rapid scaling and continuous updates. This model enhances flexibility, speeds service delivery, and optimizes operational spending. It also strengthens support for 5G-driven use cases like IoT connectivity, industrial automation, enterprise private networks, and edge-based applications.

According to the IBM Institute for Business Value (with GSMA Intelligence), 27% of network functions in communications service providers currently are hosted in public clouds.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Reduction of vendor lock-in and deployment cost

The Open RAN and cloud-native network market is strongly driven by the industry's focus on cutting vendor exclusivity and lowering spending on infrastructure deployments. Traditional RAN models limit freedom of choice, since networks depend on proprietary systems supplied by a few established vendors. Open RAN eliminates this challenge by supporting standardized, open interfaces that allow hardware and software from different suppliers to work together. Cloud-native deployments move functions into virtualized environments, removing the need for expensive dedicated equipment and simplifying upgrades. This mix reduces capital and operational costs, encourages competitive pricing, accelerates technological improvement, and gives operators greater flexibility in building and scaling networks.

Restraint:

Integration complexity and interoperability challenges

Integration remains one of the most significant barriers slowing adoption of Open RAN and cloud-native networks. Even though open standards promote cross-vendor compatibility, achieving stable end-to-end performance requires deep coordination, rigorous interoperability testing, and continual optimization. Many telecom operators are unfamiliar with managing diverse suppliers, making diagnosis and maintenance more complicated than traditional systems where one vendor controls everything. When a failure occurs, identifying responsibility becomes difficult, and support processes take longer. This increases deployment costs and delays rollout schedules. Due to these complexities, some operators continue to rely on proprietary, unified infrastructure, limiting how quickly open and virtualized solutions gain large-scale commercial adoption.

Opportunity:

Expansion in rural connectivity and low-cost deployments

There is a significant market opportunity for Open RAN and cloud-native deployments in rural coverage expansion. Traditional telecom setups are costly and difficult to maintain in remote areas, making high-capacity networks financially challenging. With open, virtualized architecture, operators can use low-cost, commercial hardware and white-box radios to reduce spending. Cloud-native automation allows centralized monitoring and remote troubleshooting, lowering the operational burden. Many governments are endorsing open, vendor-neutral networks as part of broadband and connectivity initiatives. By enabling affordable 4G and 5G deployment in underserved regions, Open RAN creates new possibilities for revenue growth while helping close the urban-rural digital divide.

Threat:

Limited skilled workforce and higher operational risk

A lack of specialized talent represents a significant threat to the commercial success of Open RAN and cloud-native deployments. Telecom teams traditionally manage hardware-based networks, but open and virtualized ecosystems require new skills in cloud management, DevOps workflows, automation tools, and container orchestration. Insufficient expertise raises the risk of configuration errors, slower troubleshooting, and longer outages. Smaller operators may depend on external consultants, increasing expenses and operational complexity. If networks cannot be reliably maintained, market confidence could drop, slowing adoption. The skills gap becomes even more serious as networks scale, making technical readiness a major factor in successful rollout of open architectures.

Covid-19 Impact:

The COVID-19 pandemic had both negative and positive effects on the Open RAN & cloud-native network industry. In early stages, travel restrictions and component shortages delayed equipment supply, integration, and field deployment. Yet the sharp rise in digital services, remote connectivity, and cloud usage pushed operators to upgrade network capacity and automation. As human resources became limited, cloud-native functions and remote orchestration gained value, reducing dependency on physical site visits. Several governments and enterprises also focused on diversifying telecom ecosystems for security and resilience, boosting interest in Open RAN. Despite temporary rollout delays, COVID-19 accelerated long-term adoption of virtualized, scalable, and software-centric network models.

The private cloud RAN segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The private cloud RAN segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period because operators want maximum control, security, and dedicated performance. Running virtualized RAN functions on privately managed infrastructure allows carriers to maintain strict reliability levels and protect core network traffic. Telecom providers can tailor configurations, optimize resources, and enforce internal governance without sharing environments with third-party clouds. Private platforms also make it easier to ensure consistent latency, system stability, and end-to-end visibility. For large commercial rollouts, this model is viewed as dependable and more aligned with traditional network operating practices, making it the preferred deployment choice today.

The enterprises segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

Over the forecast period, the enterprises segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate due to rising demand for private wireless systems and advanced automation. Industries such as factories, ports, hospitals, and energy facilities require reliable connectivity for machines, sensors, and mission-critical applications. Open RAN offers greater customization and vendor flexibility, while cloud-native designs simplify management through automation and remote control. These benefits reduce operational complexity and support scalable deployments without relying on specialized hardware. As organizations expand digital operations, secure and low-latency connectivity becomes essential, pushing enterprises to adopt open, virtualized network models. This makes the enterprise segment the strongest high-growth opportunity in the market.

Region with largest share:

During the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is expected to hold the largest market share, owing to significant governmental initiatives, rapid 5G build-outs and early launches by carriers in nations like Japan, South Korea, India and China. Carriers here are increasingly adopting open-architecture radio access networks and virtualized cloud-native systems to handle surging mobile traffic and demand for low-latency applications. With a broad vendor ecosystem, regulatory encouragement and massive mobile subscriber growth, this region has become the front-runner in commercializing Open RAN and cloud-native RAN infrastructure, securing its position as the largest regional contributor in the market.

Region with highest CAGR:

Over the forecast period, the North America region is anticipated to exhibit the highest CAGR. Telecom operators in the U.S. and Canada are pushing ahead with more software-centric and disaggregated radio access networks than other regions. The combination of mature cloud platforms, large-scale edge computing, regulatory encouragement for open ecosystems, and heavy 5G deployment activity drives this accelerated uptake. With strong capabilities in virtualization, orchestration, and multi-vendor sourcing, suppliers and operators in the region are embracing open RAN architectures and containerized network functions quickly. As operators face increasing pressure for cost-effective, flexible, and dynamic networks, North America is set to post the highest growth rate worldwide.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players in Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market include Ericsson, Mavenir, Nokia, Parallel Wireless, Samsung, NEC Corporation, Fujitsu, Intel Corporation, Qualcomm, VMware, Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), IBM, Rakuten Symphony and Cisco.

Key Developments:

In November 2025, Ericsson has won a three-year deal to modernise VodafoneZiggo's mobile network across 3,000 sites, and deploy equipment using the telco's 3.5GHz spectrum holding in the Netherlands. The deployment will enable the development of new use cases for consumers, businesses, and the Internet of Things (IoT) applications, while supporting VodafoneZiggo's sustainability targets.

In November 2025, Nokia and Latvia's largest mobile operator LMT have signed a strategic agreement to jointly develop a 5G tactical communications solution tailored for defence applications in the Baltic region. The collaboration aims to deliver a secure, high-capacity and resilient system that supports the needs of modern military operations and coalition forces.

In June 2025, Mavenir along with its existing investor Siris announced a recapitalisation plan in agreement with Mavenir's lenders. Under the plan, the transaction will eliminate over $1.3 billion in existing debt and secure $300 million in new senior financing, along with a subordinated facility from Siris and participating lenders, according to a statement from Mavenir, which was shared exclusively with ETTelecom.

Offerings Covered:

  • Disaggregated Hardware
  • Cloud-native Software
  • Integration & Managed Services

Deployment Environments Covered:

  • Public Cloud RAN
  • Private Cloud RAN
  • Hybrid Cloud RAN

Network Types Covered:

  • 4G/LTE RAN
  • 5G RAN
  • Wi-Fi 6/7

Architectures Covered:

  • Virtualized RAN (vRAN)
  • Open RAN
  • Cloud-native RAN

Functional Layers Covered:

  • Control & Orchestration
  • Security Functions
  • Edge Compute Integration

End Users Covered:

  • Telecom Operators
  • Enterprises
  • Government & Defense

Regions Covered:

  • North America
    • US
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • Italy
    • France
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • Japan
    • China
    • India
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • South America
    • Argentina
    • Brazil
    • Chile
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle East & Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • Qatar
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:

  • Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
  • Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
  • Covers Market data for the years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2028, and 2032
  • Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
  • Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
  • Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
  • Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
  • Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

  • Company Profiling
    • Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
    • SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
  • Regional Segmentation
    • Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
  • Competitive Benchmarking
    • Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

  • 2.1 Abstract
  • 2.2 Stake Holders
  • 2.3 Research Scope
  • 2.4 Research Methodology
    • 2.4.1 Data Mining
    • 2.4.2 Data Analysis
    • 2.4.3 Data Validation
    • 2.4.4 Research Approach
  • 2.5 Research Sources
    • 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
    • 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
    • 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis

  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Drivers
  • 3.3 Restraints
  • 3.4 Opportunities
  • 3.5 Threats
  • 3.6 End User Analysis
  • 3.7 Emerging Markets
  • 3.8 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

  • 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
  • 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
  • 4.3 Threat of substitutes
  • 4.4 Threat of new entrants
  • 4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market, By Offering

  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Disaggregated Hardware
  • 5.3 Cloud-native Software
  • 5.4 Integration & Managed Services

6 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market, By Deployment Environment

  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2 Public Cloud RAN
  • 6.3 Private Cloud RAN
  • 6.4 Hybrid Cloud RAN

7 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market, By Network Type

  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 4G/LTE RAN
  • 7.3 5G RAN
  • 7.4 Wi-Fi 6/7

8 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market, By Architecture

  • 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.2 Virtualized RAN (vRAN)
  • 8.3 Open RAN
  • 8.4 Cloud-native RAN

9 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market, By Functional Layer

  • 9.1 Introduction
  • 9.2 Control & Orchestration
  • 9.3 Security Functions
  • 9.4 Edge Compute Integration

10 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market, By End User

  • 10.1 Introduction
  • 10.2 Telecom Operators
  • 10.3 Enterprises
  • 10.4 Government & Defense

11 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market, By Geography

  • 11.1 Introduction
  • 11.2 North America
    • 11.2.1 US
    • 11.2.2 Canada
    • 11.2.3 Mexico
  • 11.3 Europe
    • 11.3.1 Germany
    • 11.3.2 UK
    • 11.3.3 Italy
    • 11.3.4 France
    • 11.3.5 Spain
    • 11.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 11.4 Asia Pacific
    • 11.4.1 Japan
    • 11.4.2 China
    • 11.4.3 India
    • 11.4.4 Australia
    • 11.4.5 New Zealand
    • 11.4.6 South Korea
    • 11.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
  • 11.5 South America
    • 11.5.1 Argentina
    • 11.5.2 Brazil
    • 11.5.3 Chile
    • 11.5.4 Rest of South America
  • 11.6 Middle East & Africa
    • 11.6.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 11.6.2 UAE
    • 11.6.3 Qatar
    • 11.6.4 South Africa
    • 11.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

12 Key Developments

  • 12.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
  • 12.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
  • 12.3 New Product Launch
  • 12.4 Expansions
  • 12.5 Other Key Strategies

13 Company Profiling

  • 13.1 Ericsson
  • 13.2 Mavenir
  • 13.3 Nokia
  • 13.4 Parallel Wireless
  • 13.5 Samsung
  • 13.6 NEC Corporation
  • 13.7 Fujitsu
  • 13.8 Intel Corporation
  • 13.9 Qualcomm
  • 13.10 VMware
  • 13.11 Dell Technologies
  • 13.12 Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
  • 13.13 IBM
  • 13.14 Rakuten Symphony
  • 13.15 Cisco

List of Tables

  • Table 1 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By Region (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 2 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By Offering (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 3 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By Disaggregated Hardware (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 4 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By Cloud-native Software (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 5 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By Integration & Managed Services (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 6 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By Deployment Environment (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 7 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By Public Cloud RAN (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 8 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By Private Cloud RAN (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 9 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By Hybrid Cloud RAN (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 10 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By Network Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 11 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By 4G/LTE RAN (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 12 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By 5G RAN (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 13 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By Wi-Fi 6/7 (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 14 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By Architecture (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 15 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By Virtualized RAN (vRAN) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 16 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By Open RAN (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 17 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By Cloud-native RAN (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 18 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By Functional Layer (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 19 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By Control & Orchestration (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 20 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By Security Functions (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 21 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By Edge Compute Integration (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 22 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By End User (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 23 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By Telecom Operators (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 24 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By Enterprises (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 25 Global Open RAN & Cloud-native Network Market Outlook, By Government & Defense (2024-2032) ($MN)

Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.