封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1485073

农业生物製品测试市场 - 全球产业规模、份额、趋势、机会和预测,按类型、产品、最终用户、地区和竞争细分,2019-2029F

Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, Segmented By Type, By Product, By End User, By Region and Competition, 2019-2029F

出版日期: | 出版商: TechSci Research | 英文 186 Pages | 商品交期: 2-3个工作天内

价格

We offer 8 hour analyst time for an additional research. Please contact us for the details.

简介目录

2023年全球农业生物製品测试市值为27.8亿美元,预计2029年将在预测期内实现稳定成长,复合年增长率为7.69%。 、真菌、线虫、和植物萃取物,可用于控制农作物的病虫害。它们提供了合成农药的天然且环保的替代品,减少了对有害化学物质的依赖并促进农业生态系统的生物多样性。与具有明确化学性质的合成农药不同,生物农药是具有固有变异性的生命实体。它们的有效性可能受到多种因素的影响,例如菌株、环境条件以及与其他生物的相互作用。高通量测序和生物感测器等发展正在提供更快、更准确且更具成本效益的测试方法。超越受控环境进行现场试验可以更真实地了解生物製剂的性能。研究人员、测试实验室和产业参与者之间加强合作可以加速标准化协议和最佳实践的开发。可靠且有效的生物製剂可以鼓励农民转向永续的做法。生物製品可以促进土壤健康、生物多样性和整体生态系统平衡。

市场概况
预测期 2025-2029
2023 年市场规模 27.8亿美元
2029 年市场规模 43.2亿美元
2024-2029 年复合年增长率 7.69%
成长最快的细分市场 生物肥料
最大的市场 北美洲

由于担心合成农药和化学肥料对环境和健康的影响,消费者越来越多地寻求以永续和有机方法生产的食品。这种偏好的转变正在增加对生物肥料、生物农药和生物刺激剂的需求,从而需要进行全面的测试以确保其安全性和有效性。由于合成农药对人类健康和环境有潜在的有害影响,世界各地的监管机构正在对合成农药的使用实施更严格的规定。这为采用生物替代品创造了有利的环境,生物替代品通常被认为更安全、更环保。因此,对这些替代品的测试服务的需求正在增加。新的、更有效率的测试技术使评估生物製品的功效和安全性变得更加容易和快捷,从而简化了产品开发流程。这进一步鼓励了这些环保替代品的开发和采用。

主要市场驱动因素

加强公众对农业实践的监督

对永续和有机农业的需求不断增长

农业生物检测方法的技术进步

主要市场挑战

缺乏标准化测试协议

测试成本高

主要市场趋势

生物製品多元化

专注于现场测试

细分市场洞察

类型洞察

最终使用者见解

区域洞察

目录

第 1 章:产品概述

第 2 章:研究方法

第 3 章:执行摘要

第 4 章:客户之声

第 5 章:全球农业生物製品测试市场展望

  • 市场规模及预测
    • 按价值
  • 市占率及预测
    • 按类型(生物农药、生物肥料和生物刺激剂)
    • 按产品(现场支援、分析和监管)
    • 按最终用户(生物製品製造商、政府机构和其他)
    • 按地区
    • 按公司划分 (2023)
  • 市场地图

第 6 章:北美农业生物製品测试市场展望

  • 市场规模及预测
    • 按价值
  • 市占率及预测
    • 按类型
    • 按产品分类
    • 按最终用户
    • 按国家/地区
  • 北美:国家分析
    • 美国
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥

第 7 章:欧洲农业生物製品测试市场展望

  • 市场规模及预测
    • 按价值
  • 市占率及预测
    • 按类型
    • 按产品分类
    • 按最终用户
    • 按国家/地区
  • 欧洲:国家分析
    • 德国
    • 英国
    • 义大利
    • 法国
    • 西班牙

第 8 章:亚太地区农业生物製品测试市场展望

  • 市场规模及预测
    • 按价值
  • 市占率及预测
    • 按类型
    • 按产品分类
    • 按最终用户
    • 按国家/地区
  • 亚太地区:国家分析
    • 中国
    • 印度
    • 日本
    • 韩国
    • 澳洲

第 9 章:南美洲农业生物製品测试市场展望

  • 市场规模及预测
    • 按价值
  • 市占率及预测
    • 按类型
    • 按产品分类
    • 按最终用户
    • 按国家/地区
  • 南美洲:国家分析
    • 巴西
    • 阿根廷
    • 哥伦比亚

第 10 章:中东和非洲农业生物製品测试市场展望

  • 市场规模及预测
    • 按价值
  • 市占率及预测
    • 按类型
    • 按产品分类
    • 按最终用户
    • 按国家/地区
  • MEA:国家分析
    • 南非
    • 沙乌地阿拉伯
    • 阿联酋

第 11 章:市场动态

  • 司机
  • 挑战

第 12 章:市场趋势与发展

  • 併购(如有)
  • 产品发布(如有)
  • 最近的发展

第 13 章:波特五力分析

  • 产业竞争
  • 新进入者的潜力
  • 供应商的力量
  • 客户的力量
  • 替代产品的威胁

第14章:竞争格局

  • Eurofins Scientific SE
  • Biotecnologie BT Srl.
  • SynTech Research Inc.
  • RJ Hill Laboratories Limited
  • LAUS GmbH
  • Intertek Group plc
  • Bureau Veritas SA
  • ALS Limited
  • TUV NORD AG

第 15 章:策略建议

第16章调查会社について・免责事项

简介目录
Product Code: 23374

Global Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market was valued at USD 2.78 Billion in 2023 and is expected to achieve a steady growth in the forecast period at a CAGR of 7.69% through 2029. Agricultural Biologicals are living organisms or their derivatives, like bacteria, fungi, nematodes, and plant extracts, that can be used to control pests and diseases in crops. They offer a natural and eco-friendly alternative to synthetic pesticides, reducing reliance on harmful chemicals and promoting biodiversity in the agricultural ecosystem. Unlike synthetic pesticides with well-defined chemical properties, biologicals are living entities with inherent variability. Their effectiveness can be influenced by various factors like strain, environmental conditions, and interactions with other organisms. Developments like high-throughput sequencing and biosensors are providing faster, more accurate, and cost-effective testing methods. Moving beyond controlled environments to field trials provides a more realistic picture of the biological agent's performance. Increased collaboration between researchers, testing labs, and industry players can accelerate the development of standardized protocols and best practices. Reliable and effective biological agents can encourage farmers to transition towards sustainable practices. Biologicals can promote soil health, biodiversity, and overall ecosystem balance.

Market Overview
Forecast Period2025-2029
Market Size 2023USD 2.78 Billion
Market Size 2029USD 4.32 Billion
CAGR 2024-20297.69%
Fastest Growing SegmentBiofertilizers
Largest MarketNorth America

Consumers are increasingly seeking food produced using sustainable and organic practices, driven by concerns about the environmental and health impacts of synthetic pesticides and fertilizers. This shift in preference is boosting the demand for biofertilizers, biopesticides, and biostimulants, leading to a need for comprehensive testing to ensure their safety and efficacy. Regulatory bodies worldwide are implementing stricter regulations on the use of synthetic pesticides due to their potential harmful effects on human health and the environment. This creates a favorable environment for the adoption of biological alternatives, which are generally considered safer and more environmentally friendly. Consequently, the demand for testing services for these alternatives is increasing. New and more efficient testing technologies are making it easier and faster to assess the efficacy and safety of biological products, streamlining the product development process. This further encourages the development and adoption of these environmentally friendly alternatives.

Key Market Drivers

Increased Public Scrutiny of Agricultural Practices

Consumers are becoming increasingly informed and concerned about the environmental and ethical implications of conventional agriculture. Concerns about the potential health risks associated with residues of synthetic pesticides on food are driving consumers to seek out alternatives like organic produce or food grown using biopesticides. The impact of conventional agriculture on soil health, water quality, and biodiversity is under growing scrutiny. This is leading to a preference for practices that are more sustainable and less damaging to the environment, such as the use of biofertilizers and biostimulants. Concerns about the welfare of animals raised in factory farms are prompting consumers to seek out meat and dairy products produced using more humane practices. This can open doors for the use of biological pest control methods in animal agriculture. Increased media coverage and activism around these issues raise public awareness and put pressure on policymakers and the agricultural industry to adopt more sustainable practices.

Regulatory bodies are tightening regulations on the use of synthetic pesticides and promoting the adoption of more sustainable alternatives. This, in turn, creates a favorable environment for the use of biologicals and drives the need for rigorous testing to ensure their compliance with regulations. Retailers and food companies are responding to consumer demand by offering more organic and sustainable food options. This creates market incentives for farmers to adopt practices that utilize biologicals, further increasing the demand for testing services. Consumers are increasingly demanding transparency and traceability in food supply chains. This means they want to know how their food was grown and raised, and whether it was produced using sustainable and ethical practices. The use of biologicals can be a part of this transparency movement, as testing can verify the use of these alternatives and build consumer trust. In an era of heightened public scrutiny, the agricultural industry needs to rebuild trust with consumers. Demonstrating a commitment to using safe and sustainable practices, including the use of tested and certified biologicals, can be a key step in regaining public confidence. This factor will help in the development of the Global Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market.

Rising Demand for Sustainable and Organic Agriculture

The quest for a more sustainable and organic approach to agriculture is rapidly transforming the market landscape. As consumers become increasingly concerned about the environmental and health impacts of conventional farming practices, the demand for agricultural biologicals is skyrocketing. This, in turn, is fueling the need for comprehensive and rigorous agricultural biologicals testing. The use of synthetic pesticides and fertilizers has been linked to soil degradation, water pollution, and biodiversity loss. Consumers are increasingly seeking alternatives that minimize these harmful effects. Residues of synthetic pesticides can linger on fruits and vegetables, raising concerns about potential health risks for consumers. Organic farming and the use of biopesticides offer a safer alternative. Many consumers believe that food grown using sustainable and organic methods is more nutritious and flavorful.

Biofertilizers are naturally occurring microorganisms that improve soil health and fertility, reducing the need for synthetic fertilizers. Biopesticides are naturally derived pest control agents that offer a safer and more environmentally friendly alternative to synthetic pesticides. Biostimulants are plant-derived substances that enhance plant growth and resilience, helping them resist diseases and pests. Testing assesses potential risks associated with the use of biologicals, ensuring they don't harm consumers or ecosystems. Testing confirms that the biologicals effectively control pests, improve soil health, or enhance plant growth as intended. Governments often have strict regulations governing the use of agricultural biologicals, and testing is necessary for compliance. Consumers are increasingly demanding transparency and traceability in food production. Rigorous testing provides evidence of the quality and effectiveness of biologicals, fostering trust in sustainable and organic agriculture.

The market for agricultural biologicals testing is experiencing significant growth, driven by the rising demand for sustainable and organic agriculture. This trend is expected to continue in the coming years, as consumers become even more conscious of the choices they make and the impact they have on the environment and their health. This presents a promising opportunity for companies involved in developing and providing testing services for agricultural biologicals. By investing in innovative technologies and ensuring accurate and reliable testing, these companies can contribute to a more sustainable and healthy food system for all. The rise of sustainable and organic agriculture, along with the increasing demand for agricultural biologicals testing, marks a significant shift in the way we approach food production. As we move towards a future that prioritizes environmental protection and human health, biologicals have the potential to play a crucial role in creating a more sustainable and responsible food system. This factor will pace up the demand of the Global Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market.

Technological Advancements in Agricultural Biologicals Testing Methods

The world of agricultural biologicals testing is undergoing a revolution, fueled by rapid advancements in technology. These innovations are not only streamlining the testing process but also enhancing its accuracy, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. Traditionally, identifying microorganisms in biologicals relied on slow and laborious culture-based methods. HTS has disrupted this landscape by rapidly sequencing the DNA of all present microbes, providing a comprehensive picture of the microbial community in a single test. Biosensors and Bioassays are innovative techniques that are replacing time-consuming and resource-intensive traditional bioassays for assessing the efficacy of biologicals. Biosensors utilize specific biological interactions to detect and quantify target molecules, while bioassays employ living organisms to measure the biological activity of a substance. High-resolution imaging technologies, such as confocal microscopy and micro-computed tomography, are providing unparalleled insights into the interactions between biologicals and plants or pests.

AI and ML algorithms are rapidly transforming data analysis in agricultural biologicals testing. Robotic systems are increasingly automating repetitive tasks in biologicals testing, such as sample preparation, handling, and analysis. These technological advancements hold immense promise for the future of agricultural biologicals testing. By embracing these innovations, we can create a faster, more accurate, and sustainable testing system that supports the development and adoption of safe and effective biological solutions for a healthier and more productive agricultural future. The integration of these cutting-edge technologies into agricultural biologicals testing is paving the way for several positive outcomes, Reduced reliance on synthetic pesticides and fertilizers, fostering a more sustainable agricultural system. Development of more targeted and effective biological control agents, leading to improved pest and disease management. This factor will accelerate the demand of the Global Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market.

Key Market Challenges

Lack of Standardized Testing Protocols

The rapid expansion of the Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market comes with its own set of challenges, and the lack of standardized testing protocols stands out as a particularly significant roadblock. This issue holds back the widespread adoption of biological control agents and hinders a truly sustainable approach to agriculture. Unlike their synthetic counterparts, biological control agents (BCAs) are living organisms. This inherent variability, influenced by factors like strain, storage conditions, and environmental parameters, makes it difficult to assess their efficacy and safety consistently. Currently, different countries and even laboratories employ diverse testing protocols and methodologies for BCAs. This inconsistency breeds confusion and hinders fair comparisons between products, ultimately impacting market access and adoption. Varying testing protocols lead to data inconsistencies, making it difficult to interpret results definitively and draw reliable conclusions about efficacy and safety. This can create ambiguity for regulators and uncertainty for potential users. Farmers rely on reliable data and clear evidence before transitioning to new approaches. The lack of standardized testing makes it difficult for them to compare BCAs and assess their viability for their specific needs. Without robust and consistent testing protocols, there's a potential for unforeseen impacts on environmental health and human well-being due to ineffective or harmful BCAs reaching the market.

High Testing Costs

The burgeoning Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market holds immense promise for a more sustainable future, but one significant hurdle stands in the way: high testing costs. Compared to their synthetic counterparts, these living agents face a much more complex and multifaceted testing process, driving up expenses and creating a barrier for both manufacturers and farmers. Unlike synthetic pesticides with consistent chemical properties, biologicals are living organisms susceptible to environmental factors, storage conditions, and even strain variations. This inherent variability demands extensive, multifaceted testing to ensure efficacy and safety across diverse conditions. Assessing the effectiveness of biologicals often requires lengthy field trials under real-world conditions. This includes monitoring their impact on pests, plant health, and the environment over multiple seasons, significantly pushing up the time and expense of testing. Compared to synthetic pesticide testing, evaluating biologicals often requires specialized laboratories, equipment, and trained personnel equipped to handle living organisms and analyze complex biological interactions. This specialized infrastructure contributes to higher testing costs. Start-ups and smaller players entering the biologicals market face a significant disadvantage due to high testing costs. This can stifle innovation and limit the diversity of available solutions. Farmers, particularly those in developing nations, might be hesitant to switch to biologicals due to the perceived higher cost associated with testing and certification. This slows down the overall transition towards sustainable agricultural practices.

Key Market Trends

Diversifying Biological Products

Traditionally, the market primarily focused on biopesticides as alternatives to synthetic pesticides. The wider adoption of diverse biological products can significantly reduce dependence on synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, minimizing environmental harm and promoting biodiversity. Biofertilizers and microbial inoculants enhance soil fertility and plant health, leading to improved crop yields and resilience against pests and diseases. Farmers can choose biological products tailored to their specific soil conditions, crop types, and pest issues, promoting more efficient and effective pest and disease management. Development of new testing methods and technologies specifically designed for different types of biological products is crucial to provide accurate and reliable data. Collaboration between testing labs, researchers, and industry players is key to developing standardized protocols and best practices for testing diverse biological products. As consumer demand for sustainable food grows, transparent and reliable data on the efficacy and safety of diverse biological products through rigorous testing will build trust and foster wider adoption.

Focus on Field-Based Testing

Traditional lab testing often struggles to capture the intricate interactions between biologicals, plants, and the environment. Field trials, conducted under real-world conditions, provide a more accurate picture of a biological product's efficacy and long-term impacts on soil health, pest control, and crop yields. Unlike synthetic pesticides with consistent chemical properties, biologicals are living organisms susceptible to environmental factors like temperature, humidity, and soil conditions. Field testing helps account for this variability and assess the effectiveness of biologicals across diverse agricultural settings. Farmers, who ultimately make the decision to adopt these solutions, need convincing evidence of their effectiveness under real-world conditions. Field-based testing data provides the level of assurance they seek before making the switch from synthetic methods. Field trials generate valuable data on how different environmental factors and agricultural practices influence the performance of biologicals. This information can be used to develop tailored recommendations for specific regions, crops, and pest scenarios, optimizing their effectiveness. Reliable data from field trials can build trust among farmers and accelerate the adoption of diverse biological control agents and soil health solutions. Data generated from field trials can be used to develop precision agriculture strategies that utilize biologicals in a targeted and efficient manner, optimizing their performance and minimizing environmental impact.

Segmental Insights

Type Insights

Based on type, Biopesticides emerged as the dominating segment in the Global Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market during the forecast period. Biopesticides are derived from natural sources, such as bacteria, fungi, and viruses, and can effectively target a wide range of pests, including insects, mites, and weeds. This versatility makes them a valuable tool for farmers looking to protect their crops without resorting to harmful chemicals. Consumers are increasingly concerned about the potential health and environmental hazards associated with synthetic pesticides. This has led to a growing demand for food produced using safer and more sustainable methods, including the use of biopesticides. Research and development in the biopesticides field is booming, leading to the creation of new and more effective products. This constant innovation necessitates comprehensive testing to ensure the efficacy, safety, and quality of these new biopesticides before they reach the market.

End User Insights

Based on end user, Biological Product Manufacturers segment is projected to experience rapid growth in the Global Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market during the forecast period. Consumers are increasingly seeking food produced using sustainable and organic practices. This shift in preference is driven by concerns about the environmental and health impacts of synthetic pesticides and fertilizers. As a result, the demand for biofertilizers, biopesticides, and biostimulants, which are derived from natural sources, is growing rapidly. Regulatory bodies worldwide are implementing stricter regulations on the use of synthetic pesticides due to their potential harmful effects on human health and the environment. This is creating a favorable environment for the adoption of biological alternatives, which are generally considered safer and more environmentally friendly. Focus on Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a sustainable approach to pest control that emphasizes preventative measures and the use of multiple control methods, including biological control agents. This integrated approach often incorporates the use of agricultural biologicals to manage pest populations, further driving demand for testing services.

Regional Insights

Based on region, North America emerged as the dominant region in the Global Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market in 2023. North America, particularly the United States, has a large and robust agricultural sector. The size and economic strength of the agriculture industry in the region contribute to its dominance in related markets, including agricultural biologicals testing. The region is known for its advancements in technology and innovation. The adoption of cutting-edge testing technologies and methodologies in agricultural practices may have contributed to North America's leadership in agricultural biologicals testing. North America typically has well-established and stringent regulatory frameworks governing agriculture and related industries. This regulatory environment can create a demand for comprehensive testing services to ensure compliance with standards, leading to a dominant market position. The region often invests significantly in research and development, fostering the growth of new technologies and methodologies in the agricultural sector. This emphasis on innovation can positively impact the agricultural biologicals testing market. The increasing emphasis on sustainable agriculture practices in North America may drive the demand for testing services related to agricultural biologicals, contributing to the region's dominance in this market.

Key Market Players

Eurofins Scientific SE

Biotecnologie B.T. Srl.

SynTech Research Inc.

R J Hill Laboratories Limited

LAUS GmbH

Intertek Group plc

Bureau Veritas SA

ALS Limited

TUV NORD AG

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market, By Type:

    Biopesticides Biofertilizers Biostimulants

Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market, By Product:

    Field Support Analytical Regulatory

Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market, By End User:

    Biological Product Manufacturers Government Agencies Others

Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market, By Region:

    North America

United States

Canada

Mexico

    Europe

Germany

United Kingdom

France

Italy

Spain

    Asia Pacific

China

Japan

India

Australia

South Korea

    South America

Brazil

Argentina

Colombia

    Middle East & Africa

South Africa

Saudi Arabia

UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies presents in the Global Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

  • 1.1. Market Definition
  • 1.2. Scope of the Market
    • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
    • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
    • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Objective of the Study
  • 2.2. Baseline Methodology
  • 2.3. Key Industry Partners
  • 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
  • 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
  • 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
  • 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Overview of the Market
  • 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
  • 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
  • 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
  • 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, and Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook

  • 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 5.1.1. By Value
  • 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 5.2.1. By Type (Biopesticides, Biofertilizers and Biostimulants)
    • 5.2.2. By Product (Field Support, Analytical and Regulatory)
    • 5.2.3. By End User (Biological Product Manufacturers, Government Agencies and Others)
    • 5.2.4. By Region
    • 5.2.5. By Company (2023)
  • 5.3. Market Map

6. North America Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook

  • 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 6.1.1. By Value
  • 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 6.2.1. By Type
    • 6.2.2. By Product
    • 6.2.3. By End User
    • 6.2.4. By Country
  • 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
    • 6.3.1. United States Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.1.2.1. By Type
        • 6.3.1.2.2. By Product
        • 6.3.1.2.3. By End User
    • 6.3.2. Canada Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.2.2.1. By Type
        • 6.3.2.2.2. By Product
        • 6.3.2.2.3. By End User
    • 6.3.3. Mexico Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.3.2.1. By Type
        • 6.3.3.2.2. By Product
        • 6.3.3.2.3. By End User

7. Europe Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook

  • 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 7.1.1. By Value
  • 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 7.2.1. By Type
    • 7.2.2. By Product
    • 7.2.3. By End User
    • 7.2.4. By Country
  • 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
    • 7.3.1. Germany Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.1.2.1. By Type
        • 7.3.1.2.2. By Product
        • 7.3.1.2.3. By End User
    • 7.3.2. United Kingdom Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.2.2.1. By Type
        • 7.3.2.2.2. By Product
        • 7.3.2.2.3. By End User
    • 7.3.3. Italy Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.3.2.1. By Type
        • 7.3.3.2.2. By Product
        • 7.3.3.2.3. By End User
    • 7.3.4. France Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.4.2.1. By Type
        • 7.3.4.2.2. By Product
        • 7.3.4.2.3. By End User
    • 7.3.5. Spain Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.5.2.1. By Type
        • 7.3.5.2.2. By Product
        • 7.3.5.2.3. By End User

8. Asia Pacific Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook

  • 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 8.1.1. By Value
  • 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 8.2.1. By Type
    • 8.2.2. By Product
    • 8.2.3. By End User
    • 8.2.4. By Country
  • 8.3. Asia Pacific: Country Analysis
    • 8.3.1. China Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.1.2.1. By Type
        • 8.3.1.2.2. By Product
        • 8.3.1.2.3. By End User
    • 8.3.2. India Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.2.2.1. By Type
        • 8.3.2.2.2. By Product
        • 8.3.2.2.3. By End User
    • 8.3.3. Japan Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.3.2.1. By Type
        • 8.3.3.2.2. By Product
        • 8.3.3.2.3. By End User
    • 8.3.4. South Korea Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.4.2.1. By Type
        • 8.3.4.2.2. By Product
        • 8.3.4.2.3. By End User
    • 8.3.5. Australia Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.5.2.1. By Type
        • 8.3.5.2.2. By Product
        • 8.3.5.2.3. By End User

9. South America Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook

  • 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 9.1.1. By Value
  • 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 9.2.1. By Type
    • 9.2.2. By Product
    • 9.2.3. By End User
    • 9.2.4. By Country
  • 9.3. South America: Country Analysis
    • 9.3.1. Brazil Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.1.2.1. By Type
        • 9.3.1.2.2. By Product
        • 9.3.1.2.3. By End User
    • 9.3.2. Argentina Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.2.2.1. By Type
        • 9.3.2.2.2. By Product
        • 9.3.2.2.3. By End User
    • 9.3.3. Colombia Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.3.2.1. By Type
        • 9.3.3.2.2. By Product
        • 9.3.3.2.3. By End User

10. Middle East and Africa Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook

  • 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 10.1.1. By Value
  • 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 10.2.1. By Type
    • 10.2.2. By Product
    • 10.2.3. By End User
    • 10.2.4. By Country
  • 10.3. MEA: Country Analysis
    • 10.3.1. South Africa Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.1.2.1. By Type
        • 10.3.1.2.2. By Product
        • 10.3.1.2.3. By End User
    • 10.3.2. Saudi Arabia Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.2.2.1. By Type
        • 10.3.2.2.2. By Product
        • 10.3.2.2.3. By End User
    • 10.3.3. UAE Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.3.2.1. By Type
        • 10.3.3.2.2. By Product
        • 10.3.3.2.3. By End User

11. Market Dynamics

  • 11.1. Drivers
  • 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends & Developments

  • 12.1. Merger & Acquisition (If Any)
  • 12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
  • 12.3. Recent Developments

13. Porters Five Forces Analysis

  • 13.1. Competition in the Industry
  • 13.2. Potential of New Entrants
  • 13.3. Power of Suppliers
  • 13.4. Power of Customers
  • 13.5. Threat of Substitute Products

14. Competitive Landscape

  • 14.1. Eurofins Scientific SE
    • 14.1.1. Business Overview
    • 14.1.2. Company Snapshot
    • 14.1.3. Products & Services
    • 14.1.4. Financials (As Reported)
    • 14.1.5. Recent Developments
    • 14.1.6. Key Personnel Details
    • 14.1.7. SWOT Analysis
  • 14.2. Biotecnologie B.T. Srl.
  • 14.3. SynTech Research Inc.
  • 14.4. R J Hill Laboratories Limited
  • 14.5. LAUS GmbH
  • 14.6. Intertek Group plc
  • 14.7. Bureau Veritas SA
  • 14.8. ALS Limited
  • 14.9. TUV NORD AG

15. Strategic Recommendations

16. About Us & Disclaimer