军用飞机防撞系统市场 - 全球产业规模、份额、趋势、机会和预测，按系统类型、飞机类型、地区和竞争细分，2020-2030F

2024 年，全球军用飞机防撞系统市场价值为 11.8 亿美元，预计到 2030 年将达到 18 亿美元，在预测期内复合年增长率为 7.44%。由于技术的进步以及对确保军用航空运行安全的日益关注，军用飞机防撞系统市场正在迅速发展。防撞系统对于防止复杂飞行操作期间发生事故至关重要，特别是在拥挤的空域环境中。这些系统通常使用雷达、GPS 和红外线感测器来检测附近的飞机并向飞行员提供即时警报，使他们能够采取必要的规避行动。随着国防组织使用更先进的技术升级其舰队，对更可靠、更有效的防撞系统的需求显着增加。军用飞机现代化和空中交通管制系统改进的转变正在促进该市场的成长。

市场概况
预测期	2026-2030
2024 年市场规模	11.8亿美元
2030 年市场规模	18亿美元
2025-2030 年复合年增长率	7.44%
成长最快的细分市场	无人机
最大的市场	北美洲

一些成长动力正在加速这些系统在军事领域的采用。一个重要因素是军事任务的复杂性不断增加，这通常涉及多架飞机彼此靠近执行任务。此外，军事行动中无人机 (UAV) 数量的不断增加又增加了一层风险，迫切需要强大的防撞解决方案。随着世界各地的军队将更多的自主系统整合到其机队中，防撞技术对于确保人类驾驶和无人驾驶系统能够在同一空域安全共存变得至关重要。不断增长的国防预算以及人工智慧、机器学习和感测器融合方面的技术进步也为更先进系统的开发提供了强有力的支援。

儘管成长机会充满希望，但市场仍面临一定的挑战。将复杂的防撞系统整合到现有机队中的高昂成本可能是一个障碍，特别是对于较小的国防预算。此外，对系统升级的持续需求以及将新技术融入遗留平台的复杂性可能会减缓新系统的采用。由于军队经常使用具有不同技术能力的不同平台，因此维持不同飞机类型的各种系统之间的互通性也面临挑战。随着新技术的出现，市场必须在创新与当前飞机的操作需求和限制之间取得平衡，确保在不影响任务有效性的情况下持续增强安全性。

主要市场驱动因素

军用飞机运作的成长

无人机 (UAV) 集成

感测器技术的进步

日益重视空中交通管理

国防预算不断增加

主要市场挑战

整合成本高

复杂的遗留系统相容性

在极端条件下维持系统可靠性

不断发展的监管标准

自治系统的集成

主要市场趋势

增加全球军用飞机现代化计划

越来越关注自主与无人系统

全球空中交通拥挤与军民融合

感测器和雷达技术的进步

国际合作与标准化

细分市场洞察

系统类型见解

区域洞察

目录

第 1 章：简介

第 2 章：研究方法

第 3 章：执行摘要

第 4 章：COVID-19 对全球军用飞机防撞系统市场的影响

第 5 章：全球军用飞机防撞系统市场展望

• 市场规模及预测
  • 按价值
• 市占率及预测
  • 依系统类型（雷达、TCAS、TAWS、CWS、OCAS、合成视觉系统）
  • 依飞机类型（有人驾驶飞机、无人机）
  • 按地区划分
  • 按公司划分（前 5 名公司、其他 - 按价值和数量，2024 年）
• 全球军用飞机防撞系统市场测绘与机会评估
  • 依系统类型
  • 按飞机类型
  • 按地区划分

第 6 章：亚太地区军用飞机防撞系统市场展望

• 市场规模及预测
  • 按价值
• 市占率及预测
  • 依系统类型
  • 按飞机类型
  • 按国家/地区
• 亚太地区：国家分析
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 印尼
  • 韩国

第 7 章：欧洲与独联体军用飞机防撞系统市场展望

• 市场规模及预测
  • 按价值
• 市占率及预测
  • 依系统类型
  • 按飞机类型
  • 按国家/地区
• 欧洲与独联体：国家分析
  • 德国
  • 西班牙
  • 法国
  • 义大利
  • 英国

第 8 章：北美军用飞机防撞系统市场展望

• 市场规模及预测
  • 按价值
• 市占率及预测
  • 依系统类型
  • 按飞机类型
  • 按国家/地区
• 北美：国家分析
  • 美国
  • 墨西哥
  • 加拿大

第 9 章：南美洲军用飞机防撞系统市场展望

• 市场规模及预测
  • 按价值
• 市占率及预测
  • 依系统类型
  • 按飞机类型
  • 按国家/地区
• 南美洲：国家分析
  • 巴西
  • 阿根廷

第 10 章：中东和非洲军用飞机防撞系统市场展望

• 市场规模及预测
  • 按价值
• 市占率及预测
  • 依系统类型
  • 按飞机类型
  • 按国家/地区
• 中东和非洲：国家分析
  • 南非
  • 土耳其
  • 沙乌地阿拉伯
  • 阿联酋

第 11 章：SWOT 分析

• 力量
• 弱点
• 机会
• 威胁

第 12 章：市场动态

• 市场驱动因素
• 市场挑战

第 13 章：市场趋势与发展

第14章：竞争格局

• 公司简介（最多10家主要公司）
  • Honeywell International Inc.
  • L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
  • RTX Corporation
  • Leonardo SpA
  • Thales SA
  • Garmin Ltd.
  • Avidyne Corporation
  • Northrop Grumman Corporation
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation

第 15 章：策略建议

• 重点关注领域
  • 目标地区
  • 目标系统类型

第16章调查会社について・免责事项

Global Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market valued at USD 1.18 Billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 1.80 Billion by 2030, growing with a CAGR of 7.44% through the forecast period. The military aircraft collision avoidance systems market is evolving rapidly due to advancements in technology and an increased focus on ensuring operational safety in military aviation. Collision avoidance systems are essential for preventing accidents during complex flight operations, especially in crowded airspace environments. These systems typically use radar, GPS, and infrared sensors to detect nearby aircraft and provide real-time alerts to pilots, enabling them to take necessary evasive actions. As defense organizations upgrade their fleets with more sophisticated technologies, the demand for more reliable and effective collision avoidance systems has significantly increased. The shift towards modernizing military aircraft and improving air traffic control systems is contributing to the growth of this market.

Market Overview
Forecast Period	2026-2030
Market Size 2024	USD 1.18 Billion
Market Size 2030	USD 1.80 Billion
CAGR 2025-2030	7.44%
Fastest Growing Segment	Unmanned Aircraft
Largest Market	North America

Several growth drivers are accelerating the adoption of these systems in the military sector. One significant factor is the increasing complexity of military missions, which often involve multiple aircraft operating in close proximity to each other. In addition, the growing number of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in military operations adds another layer of risk, creating a pressing need for robust collision avoidance solutions. As militaries worldwide integrate more autonomous systems into their fleets, collision avoidance technologies become critical to ensuring both human-piloted and unmanned systems can coexist safely in the same airspace. Rising defense budgets and technological advancements in AI, machine learning, and sensor fusion also provide strong support to the development of more advanced systems.

Despite the promising growth opportunities, the market faces certain challenges. The high cost of integrating sophisticated collision avoidance systems into existing aircraft fleets can be a barrier, particularly for smaller defense budgets. Furthermore, the continuous need for system upgrades and the complexity of incorporating new technologies into legacy platforms can slow the adoption of new systems. There is also the challenge of maintaining interoperability between various systems across different aircraft types, as militaries often use diverse platforms with varying technological capabilities. As new technologies emerge, the market must balance innovation with the operational needs and limitations of current aircraft, ensuring the continued enhancement of safety without compromising mission effectiveness.

Key Market Drivers

Growth in Military Aircraft Operations

As military operations become more complex and dynamic, the demand for advanced collision avoidance systems has grown substantially. Modern military aviation involves a variety of aircraft types, including fighter jets, transport aircraft, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), often operating in close proximity during missions. The complexity of these missions, coupled with the need for high levels of coordination among aircraft, makes collision avoidance systems a critical component of ensuring safety. Military aircraft are increasingly tasked with conducting joint operations, where multiple platforms, both manned and unmanned, share the same airspace. This growth in military operations requires the development and deployment of sophisticated systems capable of managing complex flight environments. In 2024, China had an estimated 3.3 thousand combat aircraft in its military aircraft fleet, followed by India with an estimated aircraft number of nearly 2.3 thousand.

Integration of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)

The growing use of UAVs in military operations presents both an opportunity and a challenge for collision avoidance systems. UAVs, especially in swarm operations, may operate in close proximity to manned aircraft, which increases the risk of collisions. As the number of UAVs continues to rise in various military roles, from surveillance to combat, there is a significant need for more advanced systems capable of detecting and avoiding these autonomous vehicles. These systems must be designed to work seamlessly with both manned and unmanned platforms, ensuring that all aircraft can operate safely within the same airspace. This trend is driving the demand for more sophisticated collision avoidance technologies that can adapt to the increasing presence of UAVs.

Advancements in Sensor Technologies

Technological advancements in sensor technologies, such as radar, infrared, and optical sensors, are transforming collision avoidance systems. Modern radar and infrared systems provide high-resolution detection capabilities, allowing for better identification of potential collision threats even in adverse weather conditions or low-visibility scenarios. These improvements are pushing the development of more efficient and reliable systems that can accurately predict and avoid collisions. As these sensors continue to improve in terms of range, accuracy, and processing speed, the performance of military collision avoidance systems is enhanced, offering more proactive and real-time solutions. Integration with AI and machine learning technologies also allows these sensors to process vast amounts of data more effectively, improving decision-making during critical situations.

Increasing Emphasis on Air Traffic Management

Efficient air traffic management (ATM) is becoming more crucial in military aviation, especially as airspaces become more crowded and diverse in their use. The need for streamlined coordination between multiple military aircraft and between military and civilian flights is driving the development of advanced collision avoidance systems that can integrate with air traffic control (ATC) systems. Airspace congestion, especially near conflict zones or military bases, makes real-time collision detection and avoidance vital. The integration of collision avoidance systems with air traffic management solutions enables a better understanding of surrounding aircraft, helping to prevent accidents. As militaries place more focus on ensuring the safety of crowded airspace, air traffic management innovations will continue to support the growth of the collision avoidance system market.

Rising Defense Budgets

As defense budgets rise globally, particularly in countries focusing on modernizing their military forces, the demand for advanced collision avoidance systems has surged. With greater investments in cutting-edge technologies, defense organizations are increasingly prioritizing the safety and efficiency of their aviation fleets. These investments enable the purchase and integration of advanced systems capable of improving the safety and operational capabilities of military aircraft. Modernizing fleets with state-of-the-art collision avoidance systems becomes a key part of military readiness, as new aircraft often come equipped with the latest safety technologies. This rise in defense spending contributes directly to the growth of the collision avoidance systems market. For instance, In 2023, the United States allocated approximately 916.02 billion U.S. dollars for its military budget. Military expenditure in the U.S. has been rising in nominal terms since 2016. A significant surge in spending occurred in 2022 following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. By the end of the first year of the conflict, the U.S. had provided over 40 billion euros in military assistance to Ukraine.

Key Market Challenges

High Integration Cost

A major challenge in the adoption of collision avoidance systems in military aircraft is the high cost of integrating these advanced technologies into existing fleets. The systems require specialized hardware and software that need to be retrofitted or installed in a wide variety of aircraft, some of which may be older platforms. The associated cost can be prohibitive, especially for nations with limited defense budgets. Integration not only involves purchasing the systems but also extensive testing, training, and ensuring compatibility with existing avionics. This can slow down the implementation process, as the military needs to balance the safety benefits with the financial burden of such upgrades.

Complex Legacy Systems Compatibility

Many military forces continue to operate older aircraft, and integrating modern collision avoidance technologies with these legacy platforms presents a significant challenge. The avionics and communication systems in older aircraft may not be designed to support the latest collision avoidance systems, which can hinder the installation of new technologies. This lack of interoperability between old and new systems creates technical barriers that require significant adaptation and customization. Ensuring that collision avoidance systems function seamlessly across different generations of military aircraft remains a complex and time-consuming challenge, limiting the pace at which these technologies can be fully adopted.

Maintaining System Reliability in Extreme Conditions

Military aircraft often operate in harsh environments, including high altitudes, extreme temperatures, and adverse weather conditions. This imposes a significant challenge on the reliability and effectiveness of collision avoidance systems. Sensors and technologies must be able to function accurately despite these conditions. Any failure in these systems during critical missions could have catastrophic consequences. Ensuring that collision avoidance systems maintain high reliability and accuracy under such extreme conditions requires robust testing and continuous upgrades. The systems must be able to withstand environmental stresses while still providing real-time data to pilots, which adds to the complexity of their development and maintenance.

Evolving Regulatory Standards

As the demand for military aircraft collision avoidance systems grows, so do the regulatory standards governing their deployment and use. Governments and international defense organizations are continuously updating their requirements to reflect advancements in technology and emerging operational needs. Keeping up with these evolving regulatory standards can be challenging for manufacturers and military planners, as they must ensure that the systems meet the latest safety requirements. This requires frequent updates to hardware and software, as well as ensuring that military forces are trained in the latest safety protocols. Compliance with these standards is critical to maintaining the effectiveness and legality of military operations, adding an additional layer of complexity to the deployment of collision avoidance systems.

Integration of Autonomous Systems

As autonomous and semi-autonomous systems become more prevalent in military aviation, ensuring seamless integration with human-piloted aircraft poses a significant challenge. Autonomous aircraft, such as UAVs, are often equipped with their own collision avoidance technologies.Ensuring that these systems can operate effectively alongside manned aircraft requires sophisticated integration strategies. The challenge lies in synchronizing data from multiple systems in real time to ensure that both autonomous and piloted aircraft can safely coexist in the same airspace. This involves complex algorithms, communication protocols, and real-time data sharing, which can complicate the deployment of collision avoidance technologies across different types of aircraft.

Key Market Trends

Increasing Global Military Aircraft Modernization Programs

One of the most significant trends driving the global military aircraft collision avoidance systems market is the ongoing and extensive modernization efforts by armed forces worldwide. Military aircraft form the backbone of a nation's defense capabilities, and to maintain their effectiveness, these platforms are continuously updated with the latest technology. As part of this modernization process, collision avoidance systems are receiving significant attention. Modernization efforts are driven by the need for enhanced safety, situational awareness, and interoperability. In this regard, collision avoidance systems, which incorporate advanced radar, sensor technologies, and data processing capabilities, are being integrated into new aircraft and retrofitted into existing fleets. These systems enable real-time threat assessment and decision-making capabilities, thus enhancing the overall safety of military operations. The trend of military aircraft modernization is particularly prominent in major defense spending countries like the United States, China, Russia, and several European nations. As a result, this trend has a substantial impact on the growth of the global military aircraft collision avoidance systems market, as manufacturers and technology providers continually develop and supply more advanced systems to meet the growing demand.

Growing Focus on Autonomous and Unmanned Systems

Another significant trend in the military aircraft collision avoidance systems market is the increasing emphasis on autonomous and unmanned systems. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones, are playing a more prominent role in modern warfare, surveillance, and reconnaissance missions. These unmanned systems are often deployed in areas with mixed manned and unmanned aircraft operations. Collision avoidance systems for UAVs are essential, as they must navigate through complex airspace while avoiding potential collisions with both other UAVs and manned aircraft. Advanced collision avoidance technologies, such as sense-and-avoid systems, are crucial for ensuring the safe and effective operation of these unmanned platforms. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms in collision avoidance systems for autonomous aircraft is on the rise. These technologies enable UAVs to make real-time decisions to avoid collisions, further enhancing their safety and operational capabilities. The adoption of autonomous and unmanned systems in military operations is a driving force behind the development and deployment of advanced collision avoidance systems, creating new opportunities for technology providers in the global market.

Global Air Traffic Congestion and Civil-Military Integration

The increasing congestion of global airspace is a key factor driving the adoption of military aircraft collision avoidance systems. This trend is primarily attributed to the growth of commercial aviation and the expansion of air travel worldwide. The coexistence of military and civilian aircraft in shared airspace further accentuates the need for robust collision avoidance systems. With military operations often taking place in proximity to civilian air routes, the risk of potential collisions or airspace violations is a constant concern. To mitigate these risks, military authorities are working to improve the integration of military and civilian airspace management. As a result, military aircraft must be equipped with collision avoidance systems that enable seamless coordination and communication with civilian air traffic control and monitoring systems. Civil-military integration efforts are particularly evident in air traffic management and surveillance technologies. Collaborative programs, such as the Federal Aviation Administration's NextGen initiative in the United States, aim to harmonize military and civilian airspace management and surveillance systems, which, in turn, necessitate the deployment of compatible collision avoidance technologies. The demand for collision avoidance systems that can adapt to both military and civilian airspace requirements is expected to fuel innovation and growth in the market. It is essential for collision avoidance systems to be able to interact with various communication protocols and radar systems used by civil aviation authorities and military organizations.

Advancements in Sensor and Radar Technologies

The effectiveness of military aircraft collision avoidance systems heavily relies on the quality and capabilities of sensors and radar technologies. Over the years, there have been significant advancements in these areas, contributing to the enhanced performance of collision avoidance systems. Sensor technologies, including active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar, LIDAR, infrared sensors, and electro-optical systems, are being integrated into modern collision avoidance systems. These sensors provide improved detection and tracking of other aircraft, even in adverse weather conditions or in electronically congested environments. AESA radar, for instance, offers increased target discrimination and tracking accuracy, allowing for the precise identification of potential collision threats. Additionally, LIDAR and infrared sensors are effective for detecting small UAVs, which may pose a unique challenge due to their size and agility. Furthermore, advancements in data processing and fusion algorithms have enabled collision avoidance systems to provide more comprehensive situational awareness. These systems can process data from multiple sensors and radar sources to create a highly accurate and up-to-date picture of the aircraft's surroundings, enhancing the aircraft's ability to assess and respond to potential threats. As sensor and radar technologies continue to evolve, the global military aircraft collision avoidance systems market is expected to witness a surge in demand for cutting-edge sensor packages that offer increased precision and reliability.

International Collaboration and Standardization

Collaboration among nations and the establishment of common standards for military aircraft collision avoidance systems are becoming increasingly important. Standardization ensures interoperability between systems from different manufacturers and promotes a more efficient exchange of information between allies in multinational operations. International agreements, such as the Standardization Agreement (STANAG) within NATO and bilateral agreements between countries, are fostering the development of common standards and protocols for collision avoidance systems. These agreements aim to simplify the integration of systems from different manufacturers and enhance the ability of allied forces to operate together seamlessly. The collaborative development of collision avoidance systems also spreads the research and development cost among multiple nations, which can be cost-effective and lead to the adoption of more advanced technologies. Moreover, by adhering to common standards, nations can pool their resources for training and maintenance, reducing overall operating expenses. The trend of international collaboration and standardization not only benefits the military but also the manufacturers and suppliers in the global market. It allows them to develop and produce systems that are compatible with the requirements of multiple nations, broadening their customer base and enhancing their competitive position.

Segmental Insights

System Type Insights

The military aircraft collision avoidance systems market is segmented by various System Type, each designed to enhance flight safety through different methods of detecting and avoiding potential collisions. Radar-based systems are one of the primary technologies used in military aircraft. These systems emit radio waves and detect objects based on their reflection. Radar is particularly useful for identifying airborne threats in all weather conditions, providing essential situational awareness for pilots navigating complex airspaces.

Traffic Collision Avoidance Systems (TCAS) are another critical segment within the market. TCAS is designed to prevent mid-air collisions by automatically monitoring the airspace around an aircraft for other transponder-equipped aircraft. When potential collision risks are detected, TCAS alerts the pilot and suggests evasive maneuvers to avoid a crash. The system is most effective in congested airspace and is typically integrated into both civilian and military aircraft, enhancing air safety across various mission types. Terrain Awareness and Warning Systems (TAWS) are essential for preventing aircraft from flying into terrain or obstacles during low-altitude operations. These systems use a combination of radar, GPS, and digital elevation maps to detect dangerous proximity to the ground and provide timely warnings to the pilot. TAWS is particularly valuable in military missions that involve low-flying aircraft, such as close air support or reconnaissance missions in rugged terrain.

Collision Warning Systems (CWS) are designed to detect and warn pilots of potential threats by assessing the relative position and movement of nearby aircraft or obstacles. These systems integrate data from various sensors, such as radar and infrared, to identify threats in real-time and alert the crew to take action. CWS plays a vital role in preventing mid-air collisions during tactical operations, where multiple aircraft are often operating in close proximity. Optical and Camera-based Systems (OCAS) are becoming increasingly important in collision avoidance, particularly in low-visibility environments. These systems use optical sensors and cameras to detect aircraft, obstacles, or terrain by capturing visual data. The integration of advanced algorithms helps in analyzing the camera feeds to identify potential threats. OCAS can complement other technologies like radar by providing additional data, especially for UAVs or in scenarios where radar may not be as effective.

Synthetic Vision Systems (SVS) use advanced graphics and simulation to create a 3D view of the environment around the aircraft, offering pilots a comprehensive view of the surrounding terrain, weather conditions, and other objects in the airspace. These systems enhance situational awareness, particularly in reduced visibility conditions, by providing a virtual representation of the surroundings. By integrating data from multiple sources, including radar and GPS, SVS improves the pilot's ability to navigate safely in complex environments, reducing the risk of collisions.

Regional Insights

In 2024, North America was expected to dominate the military aircraft collision avoidance systems market due to its strong defense infrastructure and advanced technological developments in aviation safety. The region's extensive investments in military modernization and research and development initiatives have created a favorable environment for the integration of advanced collision avoidance systems across various platforms. The United States, in particular, is heavily focused on upgrading its fleet of military aircraft, which includes fighter jets, transport aircraft, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). This modernization process involves incorporating cutting-edge technologies such as radar-based systems, TCAS, and synthetic vision systems to enhance operational safety and minimize the risk of mid-air collisions.

North America's leadership in defense spending has provided military forces with the resources necessary to integrate sophisticated collision avoidance technologies into both existing and newly developed aircraft. The focus on ensuring the safety of military personnel during complex missions, particularly in crowded airspace or adverse weather conditions, has propelled the demand for advanced systems. The region's adoption of autonomous and semi-autonomous aircraft further accelerates the need for seamless collision avoidance technologies that can operate across both manned and unmanned platforms, further reinforcing the demand in the region. The advanced research institutions and military aviation agencies in North America are driving innovation in the design and development of more efficient, reliable, and accurate collision avoidance systems. The integration of AI and machine learning technologies into these systems allows for real-time processing of vast amounts of data, improving decision-making and threat detection capabilities. The U.S. military's emphasis on safety and the reduction of human error in high-stakes missions also contributes to the increased adoption of such systems.

North America's regulatory framework and standards for military aviation safety are robust, with clear mandates for the integration of collision avoidance technologies into newer aircraft models. As these systems become a core component of flight safety protocols, the demand for high-performance, reliable collision avoidance technologies continues to grow. This makes North America a key driver in the military aircraft collision avoidance systems market, with the region leading in both technological advancement and market size.

Key Market Players

• Honeywell International Inc.
• L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
• RTX Corporation
• Leonardo SpA
• Thales SA
• Garmin Ltd.
• Avidyne Corporation
• Northrop Grumman Corporation
• Lockheed Martin Corporation

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market, By System Type :

• Radars
• TCAS
• TAWS
• CWS
• OCAS
• Synthetic Vision Systems

Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market, By Aircraft Type:

• Manned Aircraft
• Unmanned Aircraft

Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market, By Region:

• Asia-Pacific
  • China
  • India
  • Japan
  • Indonesia
  • South Korea
• Europe & CIS
  • Germany
  • Spain
  • France
  • Italy
  • United Kingdom
• North America
  • United States
  • Canada
  • Mexico
• South America
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
• Middle East & Africa
  • South Africa
  • Turkey
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

• Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

• 1.1. Product Overview
• 1.2. Key Highlights of the Report
• 1.3. Market Coverage
• 1.4. Market Segments Covered
• 1.5. Research Tenure Considered

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Objective of the Study
• 2.2. Baseline Methodology
• 2.3. Key Industry Partners
• 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
• 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
• 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
• 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Market Overview
• 3.2. Market Forecast
• 3.3. Key Regions
• 3.4. Key Segments

4. Impact of COVID-19 on Global Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market

5. Global Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook

• 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 5.1.1. By Value
• 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 5.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis (Radars, TCAS, TAWS, CWS, OCAS, Synthetic Vision Systems)
  • 5.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis (Manned Aircraft, Unmanned Aircraft)
  • 5.2.3. By Regional Market Share Analysis
    • 5.2.3.1. Asia-Pacific Market Share Analysis
    • 5.2.3.2. Europe & CIS Market Share Analysis
    • 5.2.3.3. North America Market Share Analysis
    • 5.2.3.4. South America Market Share Analysis
    • 5.2.3.5. Middle East & Africa Market Share Analysis
  • 5.2.4. By Company Market Share Analysis (Top 5 Companies, Others - By Value & Volume, 2024)
• 5.3. Global Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Mapping & Opportunity Assessment
  • 5.3.1. By System Type Market Mapping & Opportunity Assessment
  • 5.3.2. By Aircraft Type Market Mapping & Opportunity Assessment
  • 5.3.3. By Regional Market Mapping & Opportunity Assessment

6. Asia-Pacific Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook

• 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 6.1.1. By Value
• 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 6.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
  • 6.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis
  • 6.2.3. By Country Market Share Analysis
• 6.3. Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis
  • 6.3.1. China Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook
    • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
      • 6.3.1.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3.2. India Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook
    • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
      • 6.3.2.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3.3. Japan Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook
    • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
      • 6.3.3.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3.4. Indonesia Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook
    • 6.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.4.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
      • 6.3.4.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3.5. South Korea Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook
    • 6.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.5.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
      • 6.3.5.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis

7. Europe & CIS Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook

• 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 7.1.1. By Value
• 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 7.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
  • 7.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis
  • 7.2.3. By Country Market Share Analysis
• 7.3. Europe & CIS: Country Analysis
  • 7.3.1. Germany Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook
    • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
      • 7.3.1.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis
  • 7.3.2. Spain Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook
    • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
      • 7.3.2.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis
  • 7.3.3. France Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook
    • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
      • 7.3.3.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis
  • 7.3.4. Italy Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook
    • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
      • 7.3.4.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis
  • 7.3.5. United Kingdom Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook
    • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
      • 7.3.5.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis

8. North America Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook

• 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 8.1.1. By Value
• 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 8.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
  • 8.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis
  • 8.2.3. By Country Market Share Analysis
• 8.3. North America: Country Analysis
  • 8.3.1. United States Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook
    • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
      • 8.3.1.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis
  • 8.3.2. Mexico Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook
    • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
      • 8.3.2.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis
  • 8.3.3. Canada Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook
    • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
      • 8.3.3.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis

9. South America Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook

• 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.1.1. By Value
• 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 9.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
  • 9.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis
  • 9.2.3. By Country Market Share Analysis
• 9.3. South America: Country Analysis
  • 9.3.1. Brazil Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook
    • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
      • 9.3.1.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis
  • 9.3.2. Argentina Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook
    • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
      • 9.3.2.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis

10. Middle East & Africa Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook

• 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 10.1.1. By Value
• 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 10.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
  • 10.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis
  • 10.2.3. By Country Market Share Analysis
• 10.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
  • 10.3.1. South Africa Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook
    • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
      • 10.3.1.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis
  • 10.3.2. Turkey Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook
    • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
      • 10.3.2.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis
  • 10.3.3. Saudi Arabia Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook
    • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
      • 10.3.3.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis
  • 10.3.4. UAE Military Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems Market Outlook
    • 10.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.4.2.1. By System Type Market Share Analysis
      • 10.3.4.2.2. By Aircraft Type Market Share Analysis

11. SWOT Analysis

• 11.1. Strength
• 11.2. Weakness
• 11.3. Opportunities
• 11.4. Threats

12. Market Dynamics

• 12.1. Market Drivers
• 12.2. Market Challenges

13. Market Trends and Developments

14. Competitive Landscape

• 14.1. Company Profiles (Up to 10 Major Companies)
  • 14.1.1. Honeywell International Inc.
    • 14.1.1.1. Company Details
    • 14.1.1.2. Key Product Offered
    • 14.1.1.3. Financials (As Per Availability)
    • 14.1.1.4. Recent Developments
    • 14.1.1.5. Key Management Personnel
  • 14.1.2. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
    • 14.1.2.1. Company Details
    • 14.1.2.2. Key Product Offered
    • 14.1.2.3. Financials (As Per Availability)
    • 14.1.2.4. Recent Developments
    • 14.1.2.5. Key Management Personnel
  • 14.1.3. RTX Corporation
    • 14.1.3.1. Company Details
    • 14.1.3.2. Key Product Offered
    • 14.1.3.3. Financials (As Per Availability)
    • 14.1.3.4. Recent Developments
    • 14.1.3.5. Key Management Personnel
  • 14.1.4. Leonardo SpA
    • 14.1.4.1. Company Details
    • 14.1.4.2. Key Product Offered
    • 14.1.4.3. Financials (As Per Availability)
    • 14.1.4.4. Recent Developments
    • 14.1.4.5. Key Management Personnel
  • 14.1.5. Thales SA
    • 14.1.5.1. Company Details
    • 14.1.5.2. Key Product Offered
    • 14.1.5.3. Financials (As Per Availability)
    • 14.1.5.4. Recent Developments
    • 14.1.5.5. Key Management Personnel
  • 14.1.6. Garmin Ltd.
    • 14.1.6.1. Company Details
    • 14.1.6.2. Key Product Offered
    • 14.1.6.3. Financials (As Per Availability)
    • 14.1.6.4. Recent Developments
    • 14.1.6.5. Key Management Personnel
  • 14.1.7. Avidyne Corporation
    • 14.1.7.1. Company Details
    • 14.1.7.2. Key Product Offered
    • 14.1.7.3. Financials (As Per Availability)
    • 14.1.7.4. Recent Developments
    • 14.1.7.5. Key Management Personnel
  • 14.1.8. Northrop Grumman Corporation
    • 14.1.8.1. Company Details
    • 14.1.8.2. Key Product Offered
    • 14.1.8.3. Financials (As Per Availability)
    • 14.1.8.4. Recent Developments
    • 14.1.8.5. Key Management Personnel
  • 14.1.9. Lockheed Martin Corporation
    • 14.1.9.1. Company Details
    • 14.1.9.2. Key Product Offered
    • 14.1.9.3. Financials (As Per Availability)
    • 14.1.9.4. Recent Developments
    • 14.1.9.5. Key Management Personnel

15. Strategic Recommendations

• 15.1. Key Focus Areas
  • 15.1.1. Target Regions
  • 15.1.2. Target System Type

16. About Us & Disclaimer