基因改造食品安全检测市场 - 全球产业规模、份额、趋势、机会和预测，按食品类型（农作物、加工食品、其他）、按地区和竞争细分，2020 年至 2030 年

2024 年全球基因改造食品安全检测市场价值为 25.7 亿美元，预计到 2030 年将达到 40.1 亿美元，预测期内复合年增长率为 7.70%。基因改造食品安全检测是指用一套科学的分析技术和流程来评估含有或可能含有基因改造生物（GMO）的食品和农产品的安全性。基因改造食品安全检测的主要目标是评估食用基因改造食品的潜在风险，并确保这些产品符合监管标准、可供人类安全食用且不会危害环境。基因改造食品安全测试的一个重要方面涉及与基因改造生物相关的特定 DNA 序列和蛋白质的检测和分析。各种测试方法都可以用来辨识和量化这些遗传元素。常见技术包括聚合酶炼式反应 (PCR)、即时 PCR 和酵素连结免疫吸附试验 (ELISA)。测试的目的是确定基改作物中新引入的基因是否会产生对消费者构成风险的过敏原。这涉及评估基因序列与已知过敏蛋白的相似性。通常会使用测试来确保产品标籤正确。许多地区对基因改造和非基因改造产品的标籤都有严格的规定。

消费者对基因改造食品及其安全性的认识不断提高，以及对潜在健康和环境风险的担忧，促使食品生产商投资严格的测试以确保透明度和安全性，特别是为了回应消费者的需求。生物技术和分析方法的进步提高了基因改造食品安全检测的准确性、效率和成本效益。这些技术进步使得更广泛的利害关係人能够更容易进行测试。在基改作物和非基改作物种植面积接近的地区，交叉污染的风险令人担忧。这需要进行测试以验证是否符合共存规定并确保产品纯度。食品製造商和生产商寻求降低因产品中存在未经批准的基因改造成分而导致的产品召回、法律问题和声誉损害的风险。全面的安全测试是一项至关重要的风险管理策略。

主要市场驱动因素

技术进步

主要市场挑战

样品处理和保存

主要市场趋势

有机和非基因改造标籤

目录

第 1 章：产品概述

第 2 章：研究方法

第 3 章：执行摘要

第 4 章：顾客之声

第五章：全球基因改造食品安全检测市场展望

• 市场规模和预测
  • 按价值
• 市场占有率和预测
  • 依食品类型（农作物、加工食品、其他）
  • 按地区
  • 按公司分类（2024）
• 市场地图

第六章：亚太地区基因改造食品安全检测市场展望

• 市场规模和预测
• 市场占有率和预测
• 亚太地区：国家分析
  • 印度
  • 澳洲
  • 日本
  • 韩国

第七章：欧洲基因改造食品安全检测市场展望

• 市场规模和预测
• 市场占有率和预测
• 欧洲：国家分析
  • 德国
  • 西班牙
  • 义大利
  • 英国

第 8 章：北美基因改造食品安全检测市场展望

• 市场规模和预测
• 市场占有率和预测
• 北美：国家分析
  • 墨西哥
  • 加拿大

第九章：南美洲基因改造食品安全检测市场展望

• 市场规模和预测
• 市场占有率和预测
• 南美洲：国家分析
  • 阿根廷
  • 哥伦比亚

第 10 章：中东和非洲基因改造食品安全检测市场展望

• 市场规模和预测
• 市场占有率和预测
• MEA：国家分析
  • 沙乌地阿拉伯
  • 阿联酋

第 11 章：市场动态

• 驱动程式
• 挑战

第 12 章：市场趋势与发展

• 最新动态
• 产品发布
• 合併与收购

第 13 章：全球基因改造食品安全检测市场：SWOT 分析

第 14 章：波特五力分析

• 产业竞争
• 新进入者的潜力
• 供应商的力量
• 顾客的力量
• 替代产品的威胁

第 15 章： 大环境分析

第 16 章：竞争格局

• Bureau Veritas
• Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
• Emsl Analytical Inc.
• Eurofins Scientific SE
• Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
• Intertek Group Plc
• SGS SA
• Genetic ID NA Inc.
• Assure Quality Limited
• ALS Limited

第 17 章：策略建议

第18章调查会社について・免责事项

Global Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market was valued at USD 2.57 billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 4.01 billion by 2030 with a CAGR of 7.70% during the forecast period. Genetically Modified (GM) Food Safety Testing refers to a set of scientific and analytical techniques and processes used to evaluate the safety of foods and agricultural products that contain or may have met genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The primary goal of GM food safety testing is to assess the potential risks associated with the consumption of GM foods and to ensure that these products meet regulatory standards, are safe for human consumption, and do not harm the environment. A crucial aspect of GM food safety testing involves the detection and analysis of specific DNA sequences and proteins associated with genetically modified organisms. Various testing methods are used to identify and quantify these genetic elements. Common techniques include polymerase chain reaction (PCR), real-time PCR, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Testing aims to determine whether the newly introduced genes in GM crops may produce allergens that could pose a risk to consumers. This involves assessing the genetic sequences for similarities to known allergenic proteins. Testing is often used to ensure that products are correctly labeled. In many regions, there are strict regulations governing the labeling of GM and non-GM products.

Growing consumer awareness of GM foods and their safety, as well as concerns about potential health and environmental risks, have prompted food producers to invest in rigorous testing to ensure transparency and safety, especially in response to consumer demands. Advances in biotechnology and analytical methods have improved the accuracy, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of GM food safety testing. These technological advancements have made testing more accessible to a broader range of stakeholders. In regions where GM and non-GM crops are cultivated in proximity, the risk of cross-contamination is a concern. This necessitates testing to verify compliance with coexistence regulations and ensure product purity. Food manufacturers and producers seek to mitigate the risk of product recalls, legal issues, and reputational damage due to the presence of unapproved GM ingredients in their products. Comprehensive safety testing is a crucial risk management strategy.

Key Market Drivers

Technological Advancements

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Techniques have seen continuous improvements, such as real-time PCR (qPCR) and multiplex PCR. These techniques allow for the rapid and accurate quantification of specific DNA sequences in GM organisms. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies have revolutionized the analysis of genetic material in GM foods. They provide high-throughput sequencing, enabling comprehensive and detailed genetic analysis, including the identification of unknown or unexpected GM elements. Digital PCR (dPCR) is a highly sensitive technique for quantifying target DNA sequences. It offers greater precision and reliability in determining the presence and quantity of GM DNA in a sample. DNA microarrays are used to simultaneously detect multiple GM traits in a single sample. They allow for high-throughput analysis of genetic elements and can identify a wide range of GM components. These point-of-care tests use immunochromatographic techniques to quickly detect the presence of specific GM proteins in a sample. They are user-friendly and provide rapid results, making them suitable for on-site testing.

Key Market Challenges

Sample Handling and Preservation

DNA and proteins, which are commonly targeted in GM food safety testing, are prone to degradation. Inadequate sample handling and preservation can lead to the deterioration of these target molecules, resulting in inaccurate or unreliable test results. Food samples can be complex matrices, containing a wide range of components such as fats, sugars, and enzymes. Improper handling or storage can lead to the degradation of DNA and proteins and may introduce interfering substances that affect the accuracy of testing. Maintaining traceability and proper documentation of sample handling is crucial for regulatory compliance and quality control. Inadequate traceability can lead to questions about the integrity of the sample, especially when it is necessary to retest or confirm results.

Cross-contamination between samples or sample handling equipment can lead to false-positive results, especially when testing for trace amounts of GM material. Proper handling procedures are essential to prevent contamination. Sampling variability can occur when collecting samples from large batches or diverse sources. Ensuring consistent and representative sampling is a challenge in GM food safety testing, as it impacts the reliability of test results. Some GM food safety tests require specific sample sizes and quantities, which can be challenging to obtain, particularly when dealing with small or limited samples. Proper storage conditions, including temperature and humidity control, are vital to preserving sample integrity. Inadequate storage conditions can lead to sample degradation and compromised test accuracy. Samples often need to be transported to testing facilities. The handling and transportation process can introduce additional risks if not executed properly. Ensuring that a sample is well-mixed and homogeneous is essential, especially when testing for GM material that may not be evenly distributed throughout the sample. Inhomogeneity can lead to false-negative results.

Key Market Trends

Organic and Non-GMO Labels

In various countries, regulations and guidelines have been established for the labeling of GM and non-GMO products. To make non-GMO claims, food producers are often required to provide evidence of GM food safety testing to confirm the absence of GM ingredients. The non-GMO and organic labels provide consumers with a clear and easily recognizable way to identify products that meet their preferences. These labels enhance transparency and allow consumers to make informed choices about the food they purchase. Many retailers and food brands have made commitments to offer non-GMO and organic products. To meet these commitments, food manufacturers conduct GM food safety testing to verify the non-GMO status of their products. Using non-GMO and organic labels builds trust between retailers and consumers. These labels reassure consumers that the products they purchase align with their values and dietary preferences. Independent organizations provide non-GMO and organic certifications, often requiring GM food safety testing as part of the verification process. These certifications further support the credibility of non-GMO and organic labels.

Key Market Players

• Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
• Bureau Veritas
• Emsl Analytical Inc.
• Eurofins Scientific SE
• Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
• SGS SA
• Intertek Group Plc
• Genetic ID NA Inc.
• ALS Limited
• Assure Quality Limited

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market, By Food Type:

• Crops
• Processed Foods
• Others

Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market, By region:

• North America
  • United States
  • Canada
  • Mexico
• Asia-Pacific
  • China
  • India
  • South Korea
  • Australia
  • Japan
• Europe
  • Germany
  • France
  • United Kingdom
  • Spain
  • Italy
• South America
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Colombia
• Middle East & Africa
  • South Africa
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies presents in the Global Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

• Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

• 1.1. Market Definition
• 1.2. Scope of the Market
  • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
  • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
  • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Objective of the Study
• 2.2. Baseline Methodology
• 2.3. Key Industry Partners
• 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
• 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
• 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
• 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Overview of the Market
• 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
• 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
• 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
• 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook

• 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 5.1.1. By Value
• 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 5.2.1. By Food Type (Crops, Processed Foods, Others)
  • 5.2.2. By Region
  • 5.2.3. By Company (2024)
• 5.3. Market Map

6. Asia Pacific Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook

• 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 6.1.1. By Value
• 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 6.2.1. By Food Type
  • 6.2.2. By Country
• 6.3. Asia Pacific: Country Analysis
  • 6.3.1. China Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.2.1. By Food Type
  • 6.3.2. India Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.2.1. By Food Type
  • 6.3.3. Australia Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.2.1. By Food Type
  • 6.3.4. Japan Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 6.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.4.2.1. By Food Type
  • 6.3.5. South Korea Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 6.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.5.2.1. By Food Type

7. Europe Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook

• 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 7.1.1. By Value
• 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 7.2.1. By Food Type
  • 7.2.2. By Country
• 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
  • 7.3.1. France Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.2.1. By Food Type
  • 7.3.2. Germany Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.2.1. By Food Type
  • 7.3.3. Spain Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.2.1. By Food Type
  • 7.3.4. Italy Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.2.1. By Food Type
  • 7.3.5. United Kingdom Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.2.1. By Food Type

8. North America Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook

• 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 8.1.1. By Value
• 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 8.2.1. By Food Type
  • 8.2.2. By Country
• 8.3. North America: Country Analysis
  • 8.3.1. United States Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.2.1. By Food Type
  • 8.3.2. Mexico Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.2.1. By Food Type
  • 8.3.3. Canada Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.2.1. By Food Type

9. South America Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook

• 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.1.1. By Value
• 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 9.2.1. By Food Type
  • 9.2.2. By Country
• 9.3. South America: Country Analysis
  • 9.3.1. Brazil Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.2.1. By Food Type
  • 9.3.2. Argentina Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.2.1. By Food Type
  • 9.3.3. Colombia Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.2.1. By Food Type

10. Middle East and Africa Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook

• 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 10.1.1. By Value
• 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 10.2.1. By Food Type
  • 10.2.2. By Country
• 10.3. MEA: Country Analysis
  • 10.3.1. South Africa Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.2.1. By Food Type
  • 10.3.2. Saudi Arabia Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.2.1. By Food Type
  • 10.3.3. UAE Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market Outlook
    • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.2.1. By Food Type

11. Market Dynamics

• 11.1. Drivers
• 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends & Developments

• 12.1. Recent Developments
• 12.2. Product Launches
• 12.3. Mergers & Acquisitions

13. Global Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market: SWOT Analysis

14. Porter's Five Forces Analysis

• 14.1. Competition in the Industry
• 14.2. Potential of New Entrants
• 14.3. Power of Suppliers
• 14.4. Power of Customers
• 14.5. Threat of Substitute Product

15. PESTLE Analysis

16. Competitive Landscape

• 16.1. Bureau Veritas
  • 16.1.1. Business Overview
  • 16.1.2. Company Snapshot
  • 16.1.3. Products & Services
  • 16.1.4. Financials (In case of listed companies)
  • 16.1.5. Recent Developments
  • 16.1.6. Key Personnel Details
  • 16.1.7. SWOT Analysis
• 16.2. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
• 16.3. Emsl Analytical Inc.
• 16.4. Eurofins Scientific SE
• 16.5. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
• 16.6. Intertek Group Plc
• 16.7. SGS SA
• 16.8. Genetic ID NA Inc.
• 16.9. Assure Quality Limited
• 16.10.ALS Limited

17. Strategic Recommendations

18. About Us & Disclaimer