零信任架构市场－全球产业规模、份额、趋势、机会和预测（按组件、按部署、按垂直产业、按地区和竞争细分，2020-2030 年）

2024 年全球零信任架构市场价值为 185.5 亿美元，预计到 2030 年将达到 469.4 亿美元，复合年增长率为 16.73%。

与传统的基于边界的安全模型不同，零信任架构假设任何使用者或装置都不可信任，无论其位于组织网路内部还是外部。每个存取请求都会经过持续的身份验证、授权和加密，从而显着减少攻击面。随着组织采用云端服务、远端办公和自带设备环境，零信任架构提供了一个可扩展且可自适应的框架，以保护复杂的混合基础架构。

日益增多的网路威胁和资料外洩是市场成长的主要推动因素。随着针对身分、终端和资料的攻击日益增多，企业正在转向主动安全模式。 GDPR、HIPAA 和 CCPA 等监管法规也促使企业采用更严格的安全框架，例如零信任。金融服务、医疗保健、零售和製造等垂直行业的公司正在迅速整合零信任原则，以保护使用者身分、网路、应用程式和资料的安全。此外，数位转型计画和分散式劳动力已经使传统的安全边界变得过时，从而加速了对零信任采用的需求。

全球零信任架构市场预计将在创新和网路安全投资不断增加的推动下实现强劲成长。供应商正在开发整合式零信任平台，该平台融合了多因素身份验证、微分段、身份和存取管理、端点安全和即时分析等技术。基于云端的零信任解决方案因其可扩展性和易于部署的特点而日益受到青睐。随着企业寻求加强网路安全态势并减少内部威胁，对零信任架构的需求预计将呈指数级增长。人工智慧和机器学习的持续进步将进一步支援自适应存取控制和即时威胁侦测，巩固零信任作为不断发展的数位环境中基础安全策略的地位。

关键市场驱动因素

针对身分和资料的网路安全威胁不断升级

主要市场挑战

与传统基础设施整合的复杂性

主要市场趋势

以身分为中心的安全框架的采用率不断上升

目录

第 1 章：解决方案概述

• 市场定义
• 市场范围
  • 覆盖市场
  • 考虑学习的年限
  • 主要市场区隔

第二章：研究方法

第三章：执行摘要

第四章：顾客之声

第五章：全球零信任架构市场展望

• 市场规模和预测
  • 按价值
• 市场占有率和预测
  • 按组件（解决方案、服务）
  • 按部署（本地、云端）
  • 按垂直产业（BFSI、IT 和 ITES、能源和公用事业、政府和国防、医疗保健、其他）
  • 按地区（北美、欧洲、南美、中东和非洲、亚太地区）
• 按公司分类（2024）
• 市场地图

第六章：北美零信任架构市场展望

• 市场规模和预测
• 市场占有率和预测
• 北美：国家分析
  • 美国
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥

第七章：欧洲零信任架构市场展望

• 市场规模和预测
• 市场占有率和预测
• 欧洲：国家分析
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 英国
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙

第八章：亚太地区零信任架构市场展望

• 市场规模和预测
• 市场占有率和预测
• 亚太地区：国家分析
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 韩国
  • 澳洲

第九章：中东与非洲零信任架构市场展望

• 市场规模和预测
• 市场占有率和预测
• 中东和非洲：国家分析
  • 沙乌地阿拉伯
  • 阿联酋
  • 南非

第十章：南美洲零信任架构市场展望

• 市场规模和预测
• 市场占有率和预测
• 南美洲：国家分析
  • 巴西
  • 哥伦比亚
  • 阿根廷

第 11 章：市场动态

• 驱动程式
• 挑战

第 12 章：市场趋势与发展

• 合併与收购（如有）
• 产品发布（如有）
• 最新动态

第十三章：公司简介

• Microsoft Corporation
• Cisco Systems, Inc.
• Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
• Zscaler, Inc.
• Okta, Inc.
• IBM Corporation
• Broadcom Inc.
• Google LLC

第 14 章：策略建议

第15章调查会社について・免责事项

Global Zero Trust Architecture Market was valued at USD 18.55 Billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 46.94 Billion by 2030 with a CAGR of 16.73% through 2030.

Unlike traditional perimeter-based security models, Zero Trust Architecture assumes no user or device is inherently trustworthy, whether inside or outside the organization's network. Every access request is continuously authenticated, authorized, and encrypted, significantly reducing the attack surface. As organizations adopt cloud services, remote work, and bring-your-own-device environments, Zero Trust offers a scalable and adaptive framework to secure complex, hybrid infrastructures.

Rising cyber threats and data breaches are major contributors to the market's growth. With increased attacks targeting identity, endpoints, and data, organizations are shifting toward proactive security models. Regulatory mandates such as GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA also push enterprises to adopt tighter security frameworks like Zero Trust. Companies across verticals including financial services, healthcare, retail, and manufacturing are rapidly integrating Zero Trust principles to secure user identities, networks, applications, and data. Furthermore, digital transformation initiatives and distributed workforces have made traditional security perimeters obsolete, accelerating the need for Zero Trust adoption.

The Global Zero Trust Architecture Market is expected to see strong growth driven by innovation and increasing investment in cybersecurity. Vendors are developing integrated Zero Trust platforms that combine multi-factor authentication, micro-segmentation, identity and access management, endpoint security, and real-time analytics. Cloud-based Zero Trust solutions are gaining traction due to their scalability and ease of deployment. As enterprises look to strengthen their cybersecurity posture and reduce insider threats, the demand for Zero Trust Architecture is anticipated to grow exponentially. Continuous advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning will further support adaptive access control and real-time threat detection, solidifying Zero Trust as a foundational security strategy in the evolving digital landscape.

Key Market Drivers

Escalating Cybersecurity Threats Targeting Identities and Data

The modern threat landscape is characterized by increasingly targeted attacks-such as credential theft, lateral movement, ransomware, and supply chain exploits-that do not respect traditional network perimeters. Organizations are recognizing that perimeter-based defenses are insufficient when adversaries can bypass firewalls or exploit trusted insiders. Zero Trust architecture addresses this by enforcing continuous verification of every access request, regardless of source or destination, ensuring that identities and data remain protected even in compromised environments.

With identity-based attacks accounting for a growing share of breaches, enterprises across financial, healthcare, and critical infrastructure sectors are adopting Zero Trust as a core shield. Continuous authentication, micro-segmentation, and least-privilege access policies limit the blast radius of incidents and enable controlled movement within the network. As cyber risk evolves, the rigor and adaptability of Zero Trust principles are compelling organizations to shift away from legacy access models. In 2024, around 76 percent of confirmed data breaches involved misuse or theft of credentials. This alarming figure highlights the failure of perimeter-based security models and underscores the urgency for organizations to implement Zero Trust frameworks that enforce continuous identity verification and access validation at every point across their digital infrastructure.

Key Market Challenges

Complexity in Integration with Legacy Infrastructure

One of the most pressing challenges hindering the widespread adoption of Zero Trust Architecture in the global market is the complexity associated with integrating it into existing legacy infrastructure. Most organizations, especially large enterprises and public institutions, operate on decades-old networks and systems that were never designed with Zero Trust principles in mind. Retrofitting these systems requires meticulous reconfiguration of access protocols, identity management layers, network segmentation models, and endpoint visibility frameworks. This integration is not only time-consuming but also requires substantial capital investment, which becomes even more daunting for organizations dealing with outdated, unsupported, or heavily customized platforms. As a result, companies often struggle to migrate to a Zero Trust model without causing service disruptions or exposing themselves to interim vulnerabilities during the transition period.

The transition to Zero Trust Architecture demands a fundamental shift in how access and trust are managed across digital ecosystems. Unlike traditional perimeter-based models, Zero Trust assumes no implicit trust and requires continuous authentication, authorization, and validation at every access point. However, legacy systems were built on the principle of network-based trust, creating friction in aligning them with Zero Trust methodologies. Many of these systems lack support for modern authentication standards, making it difficult to establish identity-aware access control without major overhauls or custom integrations. Organizations also face skill gaps among their IT teams, who may not possess the specialized knowledge necessary to architect secure, scalable Zero Trust deployments. These factors collectively impede the pace of adoption, increase total cost of ownership, and deter organizations from fully embracing Zero Trust Architecture.

Key Market Trends

Rising Adoption of Identity-Centric Security Frameworks

A significant trend driving the Global Zero Trust Architecture Market is the increasing emphasis on identity-centric security models. As organizations shift from perimeter-based defenses toward micro-segmented, identity-driven access control mechanisms, identity verification has become the foundational layer of Zero Trust implementation. Enterprises are integrating advanced identity and access management technologies to verify users, devices, and workloads before granting access to critical resources. These systems allow organizations to enforce contextual, risk-aware policies based on real-time identity attributes, location, behavior, and device posture.

This identity-centric approach is particularly valuable in hybrid and remote work environments, where the traditional corporate network boundary has dissolved. Enterprises can no longer rely on physical network segmentation alone. Instead, by prioritizing identity as the new perimeter, organizations can minimize lateral movement of threats and detect anomalous access patterns more effectively. Identity-centric frameworks also support regulatory compliance by ensuring traceability and policy enforcement across multi-cloud and distributed infrastructures. The global surge in identity breaches and credential-based attacks further underscores the importance of adopting identity-first Zero Trust strategies across public and private sectors.

Key Market Players

• Microsoft Corporation
• Cisco Systems, Inc.
• Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
• Zscaler, Inc.
• Okta, Inc.
• IBM Corporation
• Broadcom Inc.
• Google LLC

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global Zero Trust Architecture Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Component:

• Solutions
• Services

Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Deployment:

• On-Premises
• Cloud

Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Vertical:

• BFSI
• IT & ITES
• Energy & Utilities
• Government & Defense
• Healthcare
• Others

Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Region:

• North America
  • United States
  • Canada
  • Mexico
• Europe
  • Germany
  • France
  • United Kingdom
  • Italy
  • Spain
• Asia Pacific
  • China
  • India
  • Japan
  • South Korea
  • Australia
• Middle East & Africa
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE
  • South Africa
• South America
  • Brazil
  • Colombia
  • Argentina

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Zero Trust Architecture Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Zero Trust Architecture Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

• Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Solution Overview

• 1.1. Market Definition
• 1.2. Scope of the Market
  • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
  • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
  • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Objective of the Study
• 2.2. Baseline Methodology
• 2.3. Key Industry Partners
• 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
• 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
• 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
• 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Overview of the Market
• 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
• 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
• 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
• 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, and Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook

• 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 5.1.1. By Value
• 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 5.2.1. By Component (Solutions, Services)
  • 5.2.2. By Deployment (On-Premises, Cloud)
  • 5.2.3. By Vertical (BFSI, IT & ITES, Energy & Utilities, Government & Defense, Healthcare, Others)
  • 5.2.4. By Region (North America, Europe, South America, Middle East & Africa, Asia Pacific)
• 5.3. By Company (2024)
• 5.4. Market Map

6. North America Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook

• 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 6.1.1. By Value
• 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 6.2.1. By Component
  • 6.2.2. By Deployment
  • 6.2.3. By Vertical
  • 6.2.4. By Country
• 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
  • 6.3.1. United States Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.2.1. By Component
      • 6.3.1.2.2. By Deployment
      • 6.3.1.2.3. By Vertical
  • 6.3.2. Canada Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.2.1. By Component
      • 6.3.2.2.2. By Deployment
      • 6.3.2.2.3. By Vertical
  • 6.3.3. Mexico Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.2.1. By Component
      • 6.3.3.2.2. By Deployment
      • 6.3.3.2.3. By Vertical

7. Europe Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook

• 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 7.1.1. By Value
• 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 7.2.1. By Component
  • 7.2.2. By Deployment
  • 7.2.3. By Vertical
  • 7.2.4. By Country
• 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
  • 7.3.1. Germany Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.2.1. By Component
      • 7.3.1.2.2. By Deployment
      • 7.3.1.2.3. By Vertical
  • 7.3.2. France Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.2.1. By Component
      • 7.3.2.2.2. By Deployment
      • 7.3.2.2.3. By Vertical
  • 7.3.3. United Kingdom Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.2.1. By Component
      • 7.3.3.2.2. By Deployment
      • 7.3.3.2.3. By Vertical
  • 7.3.4. Italy Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.2.1. By Component
      • 7.3.4.2.2. By Deployment
      • 7.3.4.2.3. By Vertical
  • 7.3.5. Spain Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.2.1. By Component
      • 7.3.5.2.2. By Deployment
      • 7.3.5.2.3. By Vertical

8. Asia Pacific Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook

• 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 8.1.1. By Value
• 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 8.2.1. By Component
  • 8.2.2. By Deployment
  • 8.2.3. By Vertical
  • 8.2.4. By Country
• 8.3. Asia Pacific: Country Analysis
  • 8.3.1. China Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.2.1. By Component
      • 8.3.1.2.2. By Deployment
      • 8.3.1.2.3. By Vertical
  • 8.3.2. India Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.2.1. By Component
      • 8.3.2.2.2. By Deployment
      • 8.3.2.2.3. By Vertical
  • 8.3.3. Japan Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.2.1. By Component
      • 8.3.3.2.2. By Deployment
      • 8.3.3.2.3. By Vertical
  • 8.3.4. South Korea Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.2.1. By Component
      • 8.3.4.2.2. By Deployment
      • 8.3.4.2.3. By Vertical
  • 8.3.5. Australia Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.2.1. By Component
      • 8.3.5.2.2. By Deployment
      • 8.3.5.2.3. By Vertical

9. Middle East & Africa Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook

• 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.1.1. By Value
• 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 9.2.1. By Component
  • 9.2.2. By Deployment
  • 9.2.3. By Vertical
  • 9.2.4. By Country
• 9.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
  • 9.3.1. Saudi Arabia Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.2.1. By Component
      • 9.3.1.2.2. By Deployment
      • 9.3.1.2.3. By Vertical
  • 9.3.2. UAE Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.2.1. By Component
      • 9.3.2.2.2. By Deployment
      • 9.3.2.2.3. By Vertical
  • 9.3.3. South Africa Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.2.1. By Component
      • 9.3.3.2.2. By Deployment
      • 9.3.3.2.3. By Vertical

10. South America Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook

• 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 10.1.1. By Value
• 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 10.2.1. By Component
  • 10.2.2. By Deployment
  • 10.2.3. By Vertical
  • 10.2.4. By Country
• 10.3. South America: Country Analysis
  • 10.3.1. Brazil Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.2.1. By Component
      • 10.3.1.2.2. By Deployment
      • 10.3.1.2.3. By Vertical
  • 10.3.2. Colombia Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.2.1. By Component
      • 10.3.2.2.2. By Deployment
      • 10.3.2.2.3. By Vertical
  • 10.3.3. Argentina Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook
    • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.2.1. By Component
      • 10.3.3.2.2. By Deployment
      • 10.3.3.2.3. By Vertical

11. Market Dynamics

• 11.1. Drivers
• 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends and Developments

• 12.1. Merger & Acquisition (If Any)
• 12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
• 12.3. Recent Developments

13. Company Profiles

• 13.1. Microsoft Corporation
  • 13.1.1. Business Overview
  • 13.1.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 13.1.3. Recent Developments
  • 13.1.4. Key Personnel
  • 13.1.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 13.2. Cisco Systems, Inc.
• 13.3. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
• 13.4. Zscaler, Inc.
• 13.5. Okta, Inc.
• 13.6. IBM Corporation
• 13.7. Broadcom Inc.
• 13.8. Google LLC

14. Strategic Recommendations

15. About Us & Disclaimer