现场固化管道市场－全球产业规模、份额、趋势、机会和预测，按树脂类型、固化方法、应用、地区和竞争情况细分，2020-2030 年

2024 年全球原位固化管道市场价值为 29.1 亿美元，预计到 2030 年将达到 38.9 亿美元，预测期内复合年增长率为 4.82%。

随着基础设施老化、城市化进程加快以及对经济高效的管道修復需求的不断增长，全球原位固化管道 (CIPP) 市场正呈现强劲增长势头。 CIPP 是一种非开挖修復方法，用于在无需开挖的情况下修復现有管道，已成为市政当局、公用事业和工业运营商寻求延长供水、污水、燃气和工业管道使用寿命的首选解决方案。与传统的开挖-替换方法相比，CIPP 具有显着优势，包括减少环境破坏、缩短安装时间以及降低总体成本，这对于人口密集的城市地区尤其具有吸引力，因为这些地区的基础设施更新必须在效率和最大程度减少公共不便之间取得平衡。政府对供水和污水处理网路现代化的投资推动了该市场的发展，尤其是在北美和欧洲，这些地区的基础设施已使用数十年，亟需修復。同时，亚太地区快速的城市化和工业扩张也带来了新的机会，因为中国、印度和东南亚的城市面临着对高效管道系统日益增长的需求，同时又面临预算和环境方面的限制。

从技术角度来看，树脂化学、内衬材料和固化方法的进步正在重塑市场模式。聚酯树脂因其成本效益而仍是最广泛使用的树脂，但乙烯基酯树脂和环氧树脂在需要更高耐化学性和耐高温性的应用中的份额正在不断增长。蒸汽固化凭藉其久经考验的性能和成本效益占据市场主导地位，而紫外线固化是成长最快的领域，其安装速度更快、能耗更低、耐用性更强，在高密度和环境敏感地区越来越具有吸引力。由于住宅和商业服务管线经常需要修復，小口径管道（尤其是直径不到一英尺的管道）占据了最大的市场份额。同时，随着市政当局将污水管道和输水管道作为重点，大口径管道的安装也稳定成长。

关键市场驱动因素

基础设施老化和管道老化

主要市场挑战

初始安装和材料成本高

主要市场趋势

环保和非苯乙烯树脂的需求不断增长

目录

第 1 章：产品概述

第二章：研究方法

第三章：执行摘要

第四章：顾客之声

第五章：全球原位固化管道市场展望

• 市场规模和预测
  • 按价值
• 市场占有率和预测
  • 依树脂类型（聚酯、玻璃纤维增强聚合物、其他）
  • 依固化方法（蒸气固化、紫外线固化、其他）
  • 按应用（水和污水管道、天然气管道、工业管道、其他）
  • 按地区（北美、欧洲、南美、中东和非洲、亚太地区）
• 按公司分类（2024 年）
• 市场地图

第六章：北美原位固化管道市场展望

• 市场规模和预测
• 市场占有率和预测
• 北美：国家分析
  • 美国
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥

第七章：欧洲原位固化管道市场展望

• 市场规模和预测
• 市场占有率和预测
• 欧洲：国家分析
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 英国
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙

第八章：亚太地区原位固化管道市场展望

• 市场规模和预测
• 市场占有率和预测
• 亚太地区：国家分析
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 韩国
  • 澳洲

第九章：中东和非洲原位固化管道市场展望

• 市场规模和预测
• 市场占有率和预测
• 中东和非洲：国家分析
  • 沙乌地阿拉伯
  • 阿联酋
  • 南非

第十章：南美洲原位固化管道市场展望

• 市场规模和预测
• 市场占有率和预测
• 南美洲：国家分析
  • 巴西
  • 哥伦比亚
  • 阿根廷

第 11 章：市场动态

• 驱动程式
• 挑战

第 12 章：市场趋势与发展

• 合併与收购（如有）
• 产品发布（如有）
• 最新动态

第十三章：公司简介

• Aegion
• Granite Construction
• Inland Pipe Rehabilitation
• SAK Construction
• Michels Corporation
• PURIS Corporation
• Per Aarsleff A/S
• Reline UV Group
• SAERTEX multiCom GmbH
• IMPREG Group

第 14 章：策略建议

第15章调查会社について・免责事项

The Global Cured-in-Place Pipe Market was valued at USD 2.91 Billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 3.89 Billion by 2030 with a CAGR of 4.82% during the forecast period.

The global Cured-in-Place Pipe (CIPP) market is witnessing strong growth momentum as aging infrastructure, rising urbanization, and increasing demand for cost-effective pipeline rehabilitation continue to drive adoption worldwide. CIPP, a trenchless rehabilitation method used to repair existing pipelines without excavation, has become a preferred solution for municipalities, utilities, and industrial operators seeking to extend the life of water, sewer, gas, and industrial pipelines. Compared to traditional dig-and-replace methods, CIPP offers significant advantages including reduced environmental disruption, faster installation times, and lower overall costs, making it particularly attractive for densely populated urban regions where infrastructure renewal must balance efficiency with minimal public inconvenience. The market is supported by government investments in modernizing water and wastewater networks, especially in North America and Europe, where infrastructure is decades old and requires urgent rehabilitation. At the same time, rapid urbanization and industrial expansion in Asia-Pacific are driving new opportunities, as cities in China, India, and Southeast Asia face rising demand for efficient pipeline systems coupled with budgetary and environmental constraints.

From a technology perspective, advancements in resin chemistry, liner materials, and curing methods are reshaping market dynamics. Polyester resins remain the most widely used due to their cost-effectiveness, but vinyl ester and epoxy are gaining share in applications requiring higher chemical and temperature resistance. Steam curing dominates the market thanks to its proven performance and cost benefits, while UV curing is the fastest-growing segment, offering faster installation, lower energy use, and enhanced durability, making it increasingly attractive in high-density and environmentally sensitive areas. Small-diameter pipes, especially those under one foot, hold the largest market share as residential and commercial service lines frequently require rehabilitation. Meanwhile, large-diameter installations are also growing steadily as municipalities target sewer mains and water transmission pipelines.

Key Market Drivers

Aging Infrastructure & Pipeline Deterioration

One of the strongest market drivers for CIPP is the extensive aging infrastructure across the globe. In North America alone, more than 2.2 million miles of pipelines are in need of rehabilitation, many of which are beyond their intended lifespan. Studies show that 42% of municipal pipelines are over 50 years old, placing them at high risk of leaks, blockages, and breaks. In the United States, drinking water systems have been rated C- while wastewater systems have been rated D+, underscoring the critical condition of the underground network. Aging infrastructure is not limited to the U.S.-many European cities face similar challenges, with more than 35% of sewer systems exceeding 40 years of service life. Municipalities are increasingly adopting trenchless technologies, and about 39% of utility providers already use CIPP methods for at least part of their rehabilitation programs. Case projects demonstrate the impact: in Texas, for example, over 30,000 feet of cast-iron water mains were rehabilitated using trenchless methods, saving over USD5 million compared to open-cut replacement. These figures highlight how widespread deterioration of water, sewer, and industrial pipelines is fueling consistent global demand for CIPP as a cost-effective and less disruptive rehabilitation solution.

Key Market Challenges

High Initial Installation and Material Costs

One of the foremost challenges in the global CIPP market is the relatively high upfront cost of installation compared to traditional dig-and-replace methods. The specialized equipment, resins, and liners required for CIPP rehabilitation projects demand significant investment, making it less accessible for municipalities with limited budgets. For instance, epoxy and polyester resin prices have risen by more than 20% in recent years due to raw material supply fluctuations, directly impacting project costs. Additionally, the cost of advanced UV curing systems can exceed several hundred thousand dollars, creating barriers for small contractors. Labor is another factor, as trained technicians who can handle trenchless rehabilitation demand premium wages. Furthermore, transportation of liners and resin-impregnated materials requires controlled conditions, adding logistics expenses. While the method reduces long-term costs by minimizing excavation and restoration, the upfront financial burden discourages adoption in cost-sensitive regions. This creates a market barrier, particularly in developing countries where infrastructure rehabilitation is needed most but budgets are constrained. The long-term cost-benefit often fails to outweigh the short-term expenditure from a procurement standpoint, slowing market penetration.

Key Market Trends

Rising Demand for Eco-Friendly and Non-Styrene Resins

Sustainability concerns are driving a notable trend toward eco-friendly resins in CIPP applications. Traditional styrene-based resins are being replaced with non-styrene alternatives such as vinyl ester, silicate, and epoxy systems, which release significantly fewer VOCs during curing. For instance, non-styrene resins can cut VOC emissions by up to 90%, addressing environmental regulations and community concerns. Additionally, epoxy-based liners provide superior mechanical strength and chemical resistance, extending service life to more than 50 years in some applications. Though these alternatives are more expensive, municipalities are increasingly willing to invest in sustainable solutions to meet climate targets. The adoption of green resins is also supported by certification programs that recognize environmentally friendly construction practices. Demand for sustainable CIPP solutions is particularly high in Europe, where regulatory frameworks such as REACH and the EU Green Deal encourage the use of safer materials. This shift toward eco-friendly resins not only mitigates regulatory risks but also enhances public acceptance of trenchless rehabilitation technologies, positioning them as sustainable infrastructure solutions.

Key Market Players

• Aegion
• Granite Construction
• Inland Pipe Rehabilitation
• SAK Construction
• Michels Corporation
• PURIS Corporation
• Per Aarsleff A/S
• Reline UV Group
• SAERTEX multiCom GmbH
• IMPREG Group

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global Cured-in-Place Pipe Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Cured-in-Place Pipe Market, By Resin Type:

• Polyester
• Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer
• Others

Cured-in-Place Pipe Market, By Curing Method:

• Steam Curing
• UV Curing
• Others

Cured-in-Place Pipe Market, By Application:

• Water & Sewer Lines
• Gas Pipelines
• Industrial Piping
• Others

Cured-in-Place Pipe Market, By Region:

• North America
  • United States
  • Canada
  • Mexico
• Europe
  • Germany
  • France
  • United Kingdom
  • Italy
  • Spain
• South America
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Colombia
• Asia-Pacific
  • China
  • India
  • Japan
  • South Korea
  • Australia
• Middle East & Africa
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE
  • South Africa

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Cured-in-Place Pipe Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Cured-in-Place Pipe Market report with the given market data, Tech Sci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

• Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

• 1.1. Market Definition
• 1.2. Scope of the Market
  • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
  • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
  • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Objective of the Study
• 2.2. Baseline Methodology
• 2.3. Key Industry Partners
• 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
• 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
• 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
• 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Overview of the Market
• 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
• 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
• 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
• 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, and Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook

• 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 5.1.1. By Value
• 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 5.2.1. By Resin Type (Polyester, Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer, Others)
  • 5.2.2. By Curing Method (Steam Curing, UV Curing, Others)
  • 5.2.3. By Application (Water & Sewer Lines, Gas Pipelines, Industrial Piping, Others)
  • 5.2.4. By Region (North America, Europe, South America, Middle East & Africa, Asia Pacific)
• 5.3. By Company (2024)
• 5.4. Market Map

6. North America Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook

• 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 6.1.1. By Value
• 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 6.2.1. By Resin Type
  • 6.2.2. By Curing Method
  • 6.2.3. By Application
  • 6.2.4. By Country
• 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
  • 6.3.1. United States Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 6.3.1.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 6.3.1.2.3. By Application
  • 6.3.2. Canada Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 6.3.2.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 6.3.2.2.3. By Application
  • 6.3.3. Mexico Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 6.3.3.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 6.3.3.2.3. By Application

7. Europe Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook

• 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 7.1.1. By Value
• 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 7.2.1. By Resin Type
  • 7.2.2. By Curing Method
  • 7.2.3. By Application
  • 7.2.4. By Country
• 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
  • 7.3.1. Germany Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 7.3.1.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 7.3.1.2.3. By Application
  • 7.3.2. France Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 7.3.2.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 7.3.2.2.3. By Application
  • 7.3.3. United Kingdom Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 7.3.3.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 7.3.3.2.3. By Application
  • 7.3.4. Italy Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 7.3.4.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 7.3.4.2.3. By Application
  • 7.3.5. Spain Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 7.3.5.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 7.3.5.2.3. By Application

8. Asia Pacific Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook

• 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 8.1.1. By Value
• 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 8.2.1. By Resin Type
  • 8.2.2. By Curing Method
  • 8.2.3. By Application
  • 8.2.4. By Country
• 8.3. Asia Pacific: Country Analysis
  • 8.3.1. China Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 8.3.1.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 8.3.1.2.3. By Application
  • 8.3.2. India Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 8.3.2.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 8.3.2.2.3. By Application
  • 8.3.3. Japan Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 8.3.3.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 8.3.3.2.3. By Application
  • 8.3.4. South Korea Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 8.3.4.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 8.3.4.2.3. By Application
  • 8.3.5. Australia Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 8.3.5.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 8.3.5.2.3. By Application

9. Middle East & Africa Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook

• 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.1.1. By Value
• 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 9.2.1. By Resin Type
  • 9.2.2. By Curing Method
  • 9.2.3. By Application
  • 9.2.4. By Country
• 9.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
  • 9.3.1. Saudi Arabia Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 9.3.1.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 9.3.1.2.3. By Application
  • 9.3.2. UAE Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 9.3.2.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 9.3.2.2.3. By Application
  • 9.3.3. South Africa Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 9.3.3.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 9.3.3.2.3. By Application

10. South America Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook

• 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 10.1.1. By Value
• 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 10.2.1. By Resin Type
  • 10.2.2. By Curing Method
  • 10.2.3. By Application
  • 10.2.4. By Country
• 10.3. South America: Country Analysis
  • 10.3.1. Brazil Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 10.3.1.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 10.3.1.2.3. By Application
  • 10.3.2. Colombia Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 10.3.2.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 10.3.2.2.3. By Application
  • 10.3.3. Argentina Cured-in-Place Pipe Market Outlook
    • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.2.1. By Resin Type
      • 10.3.3.2.2. By Curing Method
      • 10.3.3.2.3. By Application

11. Market Dynamics

• 11.1. Drivers
• 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends and Developments

• 12.1. Merger & Acquisition (If Any)
• 12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
• 12.3. Recent Developments

13. Company Profiles

• 13.1. Aegion
  • 13.1.1. Business Overview
  • 13.1.2. Key Revenue and Financials
  • 13.1.3. Recent Developments
  • 13.1.4. Key Personnel
  • 13.1.5. Key Product/Services Offered
• 13.2. Granite Construction
• 13.3. Inland Pipe Rehabilitation
• 13.4. SAK Construction
• 13.5. Michels Corporation
• 13.6. PURIS Corporation
• 13.7. Per Aarsleff A/S
• 13.8. Reline UV Group
• 13.9. SAERTEX multiCom GmbH
• 13.10. IMPREG Group

14. Strategic Recommendations

15. About Us & Disclaimer