封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1914565

网路安全策略管理市场 - 全球产业规模、份额、趋势、机会及预测(按组件、企业规模、解决方案、最终用户、地区和竞争格局划分,2021-2031 年)

Network Security Policy Management Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, Segmented By Component, By Enterprise Size, By Solution, By End User, By Region & Competition, 2021-2031F

出版日期: | 出版商: TechSci Research | 英文 185 Pages | 商品交期: 2-3个工作天内

价格

We offer 8 hour analyst time for an additional research. Please contact us for the details.

简介目录

全球网路安全策略管理市场预计将从 2025 年的 32.8 亿美元成长到 2031 年的 63.5 亿美元,复合年增长率为 11.64%。

网路安全策略管理 (NSPM) 解决方案可让组织自动建立、审核和分析混合 IT 环境中的安全规则,从而确保合规性并降低风险。该技术提供集中式可视性,简化复杂的防火墙策略,并消除冗余控制。推动市场发展的关键因素是网路生态系统的日益复杂化,云端和本地基础设施的整合需要统一的管理来防止安全漏洞。此外,减少手动配置错误和遵守严格的资料保护标准的迫切需求也在加速这些自动化平台的普及。

市场概览
预测期 2027-2031
市场规模:2025年 32.8亿美元
市场规模:2031年 63.5亿美元
复合年增长率:2026-2031年 11.64%
成长最快的细分市场 银行、金融服务和保险(BFSI)
最大的市场 北美洲

然而,由于缺乏实施和监管这些先进系统所需的专业技术人员,市场成长受到严重阻碍。由于缺乏足够的技术专长,企业往往难以将网路安全策略管理 (NSPM) 工具有效地整合到其原有架构中,造成实施瓶颈。根据 ISC2 预测,到 2024 年,全球网路安全人才缺口将接近 480 万,凸显了严重的人才缺口,这限制了企业维护和管理全面安全策略框架的能力。

市场驱动因素

混合多重云端IT基础设施的快速扩张是全球网路安全策略管理 (NSPM) 市场的主要驱动力。随着企业将资产分布在本地资料中心和公共云端平台之间,维护一致的安全态势的复杂性显着增加。 NSPM 工具对于协调这些分散式环境中的规则至关重要,它能确保安全意图准确反映在技术配置中,同时又不影响连结性。根据 Flexera 2024 年 3 月发布的《云端状态报告》,89% 的受访者表示他们拥有多重云端策略。这种广泛的应用需要一个集中式管理平台来弥合传统硬体和动态云端资源之间的营运差距,​​从而推动了对统一策略可见性的需求。

此外,自动化在消除手动配置错误方面的重要性日益凸显,这正在加速这些解决方案的普及。传统的防火墙规则修改方法耗时费力,且容易出错,从而暴露安全漏洞并导致网路中断。 NSPM 平台透过自动化变更请求并在实施前根据合规性标准验证检验,来降低这些风险。根据泰雷兹发布的《2024 年资料威胁报告》(2024 年 3 月),31% 的受访者认为人为错误是资料外洩的主要原因。这些疏忽造成的经济损失不断增加,迫使企业优先考虑透过技术手段减少错误。 IBM 预测,到 2024 年,全球资料外洩的平均成本将达到 488 万美元,凸显了自动化和精准保全行动的迫切经济意义。

市场挑战

网路安全专业人才短缺是全球网路安全策略管理市场成长的主要障碍。儘管策略管理平台透过自动化简化了操作,但仍需要具备相关知识的操作人员来定义架构、检验规则变更并解读合规性审核。当企业面临合格人员短缺时,现有团队会被日常工作压得喘不过气来,缺乏资源部署和管理新的管治工具。这种人力资源限制导致企业无法确保平台正常运作所需的监管,迫使他们推迟采购决策或限制采用范围。

人才短缺直接影响市场收入,导致销售週期延长,中大型企业对策略管理软体的采用率降低。企业往往难以证明投资现有员工无法有效使用的工具的合理性。根据ISACA预测,到2024年,57%的组织将面临网路安全团队人手不足的问题。这种普遍存在的人才短缺限制了企业扩展安全基础设施的能力,并阻碍了更广泛的市场扩张,因为企业优先考虑的是维持基本运营,而不是部署专业的策略管理解决方案。

市场趋势

随着企业从基于边界的防御转向以身分为中心的检验模型,零信任网路存取(ZTNA) 框架的采用正在迅速改变全球网路安全策略管理市场。这种模式转移需要一个动态策略引擎,能够在授予特定应用程式存取权限之前持续验证使用者和装置的身份,从而限制在受损网路中的横向移动。随着企业将资源分布在各种不同的环境中,传统防火墙的静态规则正逐渐过时,需要能够根据即时风险评估进行调整的细微、情境感知策略控制。根据 Zscaler 发布的《2025 年 1 月网路威胁与防御情势报告》,81% 的企业已将零信任原则作为其网路安全战略的基础,这极大地推动了对能够统一和管理这些严格检验通讯协定的平台的需求。

同时,将人工智慧 (AI) 整合到策略优化中对于应对现代威胁环境的规模和速度至关重要。安全团队正在加速采用 AI 驱动的工具,以实现对庞大规则集的自动化分析、识别冗余并预测人工审核可能遗漏的潜在漏洞。保护新兴技术以及弥合快速开发週期与安全管治之间差距的需求进一步推动了这一趋势。根据 Palo Alto Networks 于 2025 年 12 月发布的《2025 年云端安全报告》,99% 的组织在过去一年中至少遭受过一次针对其 AI 系统的网路攻击,这凸显了构建智慧自动化策略框架的紧迫性,这些框架能够保护这些复杂的高价值资产免受高级攻击。

目录

第一章概述

第二章调查方法

第三章执行摘要

第四章:客户评价

5. 全球网路安全策略管理市场展望

  • 市场规模及预测
    • 按金额
  • 市占率及预测
    • 依元件划分(软体(云端、本机部署)、服务(专业服务、主机服务))
    • 依公司规模(中小企业、大型企业)
    • 按解决方案分类(安全策略管理、变更管理系统、网路合规策略、风险和漏洞评估、其他)
    • 按最终用户划分(IT和电信、能源和公共产业、零售、製造和医疗保健、银行、金融服务和保险(BFSI)、医疗保健、其他)
    • 按地区
    • 按公司(2025 年)
  • 市场地图

6. 北美网路安全策略管理市场展望

  • 市场规模及预测
  • 市占率及预测
  • 北美洲:国家分析
    • 美国
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥

7. 欧洲网路安全策略管理市场展望

  • 市场规模及预测
  • 市占率及预测
  • 欧洲:国家分析
    • 德国
    • 法国
    • 英国
    • 义大利
    • 西班牙

8. 亚太地区网路安全策略管理市场展望

  • 市场规模及预测
  • 市占率及预测
  • 亚太地区:国家分析
    • 中国
    • 印度
    • 日本
    • 韩国
    • 澳洲

9. 中东与非洲网路安全策略管理市场展望

  • 市场规模及预测
  • 市占率及预测
  • 中东和非洲:国家分析
    • 沙乌地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公国
    • 南非

10. 南美洲网路安全策略管理市场展望

  • 市场规模及预测
  • 市占率及预测
  • 南美洲:国家分析
    • 巴西
    • 哥伦比亚
    • 阿根廷

第十一章 市场动态

  • 司机
  • 任务

第十二章 市场趋势与发展

  • 併购
  • 产品发布
  • 最新进展

13. 全球网路安全策略管理市场:SWOT 分析

第十四章:波特五力分析

  • 产业竞争
  • 新进入者的可能性
  • 供应商电力
  • 顾客权力
  • 替代品的威胁

第十五章 竞争格局

  • Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
  • AlgoSec Inc.
  • Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
  • Tufin Software Technologies Ltd.
  • FireMon, LLC.
  • Forcepoint LLC
  • IBM Corporation
  • Juniper Networks, Inc.
  • Sophos Ltd.
  • Cisco Systems, Inc.

第十六章 策略建议

第十七章:关于研究公司及免责声明

简介目录
Product Code: 3675

The Global Network Security Policy Management Market is projected to expand from USD 3.28 Billion in 2025 to USD 6.35 Billion by 2031, registering a CAGR of 11.64%. Network Security Policy Management (NSPM) solutions allow organizations to automate the generation, auditing, and analysis of security rules across hybrid IT landscapes, ensuring regulatory compliance and mitigating risks. This technology offers centralized visibility to simplify intricate firewall policies and remove redundant controls. The market is primarily driven by the increasing complexity of network ecosystems, where the convergence of cloud and on-premise infrastructures requires unified management to prevent security gaps. Furthermore, the critical need to reduce manual configuration errors and strictly adhere to data protection standards accelerates the adoption of these automation platforms.

Market Overview
Forecast Period2027-2031
Market Size 2025USD 3.28 Billion
Market Size 2031USD 6.35 Billion
CAGR 2026-203111.64%
Fastest Growing SegmentBanking, Financial Services & Insurance (BFSI)
Largest MarketNorth America

However, market growth is significantly hindered by an acute shortage of skilled professionals needed to implement and oversee these sophisticated systems. Organizations frequently struggle to integrate NSPM tools effectively into legacy architectures without sufficient technical expertise, creating a bottleneck in adoption. According to ISC2, the global cybersecurity workforce gap reached nearly 4.8 million professionals in 2024, highlighting a severe talent deficit that restricts the ability of enterprises to maintain and manage comprehensive security policy frameworks.

Market Driver

The rapid expansion of hybrid and multi-cloud IT infrastructures acts as a primary catalyst for the Global Network Security Policy Management Market. As enterprises disperse assets across on-premise data centers and public cloud platforms, the complexity of maintaining consistent security postures increases significantly. NSPM tools are essential for orchestrating rules across these fragmented environments, ensuring that security intents are accurately translated into technical configurations without disrupting connectivity. According to Flexera, March 2024, in the 'State of the Cloud Report', 89% of respondents reported having a multi-cloud strategy. This widespread adoption necessitates centralized management platforms capable of bridging the operational gap between legacy hardware and dynamic cloud resources, driving the demand for unified policy visibility.

Furthermore, the critical need for automation to eliminate manual configuration errors accelerates the deployment of these solutions. Traditional methods of modifying firewall rules are labor-intensive and prone to mistakes that create vulnerabilities or cause network outages. NSPM platforms mitigate these risks by automating change requests and validating policies against compliance baselines before implementation. According to Thales, March 2024, in the '2024 Data Threat Report', human error was identified as the leading cause of data breaches by 31% of respondents. The financial stakes of such oversights are rising, compelling organizations to prioritize error reduction through technological intervention. According to IBM, in 2024, the global average cost of a data breach reached USD 4.88 million, highlighting the urgent economic requirement for automated and accurate security operations.

Market Challenge

The shortage of skilled cybersecurity professionals constitutes a primary impediment to the growth of the Global Network Security Policy Management Market. While policy management platforms utilize automation to streamline operations, they require knowledgeable human operators to define architecture, validate rule changes, and interpret compliance audits. When enterprises face a scarcity of qualified personnel, existing teams become overwhelmed by daily operational tasks and lack the bandwidth to implement or manage new governance tools. This resource constraint causes organizations to delay purchasing decisions or limit the scope of their deployments, as they cannot guarantee the necessary oversight for these platforms to function correctly.

This talent deficit directly impacts market revenue by extending sales cycles and reducing the adoption rate of policy management software among mid-sized and large enterprises. Companies frequently struggle to justify investments in tools that their current workforce cannot effectively utilize. According to ISACA, in 2024, 57% of organizations reported that their cybersecurity teams were understaffed. This widespread lack of available talent restricts the ability of businesses to scale their security infrastructure, thereby stalling the broader expansion of the market as firms prioritize maintaining basic operations over adopting specialized policy management solutions.

Market Trends

The Adoption of Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) Frameworks is rapidly reshaping the Global Network Security Policy Management Market as organizations move beyond perimeter-based defenses to identity-centric verification models. This paradigm shift requires dynamic policy engines capable of continuously authenticating users and devices before granting access to specific applications, thereby limiting lateral movement within compromised networks. As enterprises distribute resources across diverse environments, the static rules of traditional firewalls are becoming obsolete, necessitating granular, context-aware policy controls that adapt to real-time risk assessments. According to Zscaler, January 2025, in the 'State of Cyberthreats and Protection Report', 81% of organizations are now adopting zero trust principles as the cornerstone of their cybersecurity strategies, underscoring the critical demand for management platforms that can orchestrate these rigorous verification protocols.

Simultaneously, the Integration of Artificial Intelligence for Policy Optimization is becoming indispensable for managing the scale and velocity of modern threat landscapes. Security teams are increasingly deploying AI-driven tools to automate the analysis of vast rule sets, identifying redundancies and predicting potential vulnerabilities that manual auditing would miss. This trend is accelerated by the need to secure emerging technologies and close the gap between rapid development cycles and security governance. According to Palo Alto Networks, December 2025, in the 'State of Cloud Security Report 2025', 99% of organizations experienced at least one cyberattack on their AI systems within the past year, highlighting the urgent necessity for intelligent, automated policy frameworks capable of defending these complex and high-value assets against sophisticated exploitations.

Key Market Players

  • Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
  • AlgoSec Inc.
  • Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
  • Tufin Software Technologies Ltd.
  • FireMon, LLC.
  • Forcepoint LLC
  • IBM Corporation
  • Juniper Networks, Inc.
  • Sophos Ltd.
  • Cisco Systems, Inc.

Report Scope

In this report, the Global Network Security Policy Management Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Network Security Policy Management Market, By Component

  • Software (Cloud-based, On-premise)
  • Services (Professional Services, Managed Services)

Network Security Policy Management Market, By Enterprise Size

  • Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
  • Large Enterprises

Network Security Policy Management Market, By Solution

  • Security Policy Management
  • Change Management System
  • Network Compliance Policy
  • Risk & Vulnerability Assessment
  • Others

Network Security Policy Management Market, By End User

  • IT & Telecom
  • Energy & Utilities
  • Retail
  • Manufacturing & Healthcare
  • Banking
  • Financial Services & Insurance (BFSI)
  • Healthcare
  • Others

Network Security Policy Management Market, By Region

  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • France
    • United Kingdom
    • Italy
    • Germany
    • Spain
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Australia
    • South Korea
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Colombia
  • Middle East & Africa
    • South Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Network Security Policy Management Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Network Security Policy Management Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

  • 1.1. Market Definition
  • 1.2. Scope of the Market
    • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
    • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
    • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Objective of the Study
  • 2.2. Baseline Methodology
  • 2.3. Key Industry Partners
  • 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
  • 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
  • 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
  • 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Overview of the Market
  • 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
  • 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
  • 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
  • 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook

  • 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 5.1.1. By Value
  • 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 5.2.1. By Component (Software (Cloud-based, On-premise), Services (Professional Services, Managed Services))
    • 5.2.2. By Enterprise Size (Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs), Large Enterprises)
    • 5.2.3. By Solution (Security Policy Management, Change Management System, Network Compliance Policy, Risk & Vulnerability Assessment, Others)
    • 5.2.4. By End User (IT & Telecom, Energy & Utilities, Retail, Manufacturing & Healthcare, Banking, Financial Services & Insurance (BFSI), Healthcare, Others)
    • 5.2.5. By Region
    • 5.2.6. By Company (2025)
  • 5.3. Market Map

6. North America Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook

  • 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 6.1.1. By Value
  • 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 6.2.1. By Component
    • 6.2.2. By Enterprise Size
    • 6.2.3. By Solution
    • 6.2.4. By End User
    • 6.2.5. By Country
  • 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
    • 6.3.1. United States Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.1.2.1. By Component
        • 6.3.1.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 6.3.1.2.3. By Solution
        • 6.3.1.2.4. By End User
    • 6.3.2. Canada Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.2.2.1. By Component
        • 6.3.2.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 6.3.2.2.3. By Solution
        • 6.3.2.2.4. By End User
    • 6.3.3. Mexico Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.3.2.1. By Component
        • 6.3.3.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 6.3.3.2.3. By Solution
        • 6.3.3.2.4. By End User

7. Europe Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook

  • 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 7.1.1. By Value
  • 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 7.2.1. By Component
    • 7.2.2. By Enterprise Size
    • 7.2.3. By Solution
    • 7.2.4. By End User
    • 7.2.5. By Country
  • 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
    • 7.3.1. Germany Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.1.2.1. By Component
        • 7.3.1.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 7.3.1.2.3. By Solution
        • 7.3.1.2.4. By End User
    • 7.3.2. France Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.2.2.1. By Component
        • 7.3.2.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 7.3.2.2.3. By Solution
        • 7.3.2.2.4. By End User
    • 7.3.3. United Kingdom Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.3.2.1. By Component
        • 7.3.3.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 7.3.3.2.3. By Solution
        • 7.3.3.2.4. By End User
    • 7.3.4. Italy Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.4.2.1. By Component
        • 7.3.4.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 7.3.4.2.3. By Solution
        • 7.3.4.2.4. By End User
    • 7.3.5. Spain Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.5.2.1. By Component
        • 7.3.5.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 7.3.5.2.3. By Solution
        • 7.3.5.2.4. By End User

8. Asia Pacific Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook

  • 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 8.1.1. By Value
  • 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 8.2.1. By Component
    • 8.2.2. By Enterprise Size
    • 8.2.3. By Solution
    • 8.2.4. By End User
    • 8.2.5. By Country
  • 8.3. Asia Pacific: Country Analysis
    • 8.3.1. China Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.1.2.1. By Component
        • 8.3.1.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 8.3.1.2.3. By Solution
        • 8.3.1.2.4. By End User
    • 8.3.2. India Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.2.2.1. By Component
        • 8.3.2.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 8.3.2.2.3. By Solution
        • 8.3.2.2.4. By End User
    • 8.3.3. Japan Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.3.2.1. By Component
        • 8.3.3.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 8.3.3.2.3. By Solution
        • 8.3.3.2.4. By End User
    • 8.3.4. South Korea Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.4.2.1. By Component
        • 8.3.4.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 8.3.4.2.3. By Solution
        • 8.3.4.2.4. By End User
    • 8.3.5. Australia Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.5.2.1. By Component
        • 8.3.5.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 8.3.5.2.3. By Solution
        • 8.3.5.2.4. By End User

9. Middle East & Africa Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook

  • 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 9.1.1. By Value
  • 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 9.2.1. By Component
    • 9.2.2. By Enterprise Size
    • 9.2.3. By Solution
    • 9.2.4. By End User
    • 9.2.5. By Country
  • 9.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
    • 9.3.1. Saudi Arabia Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.1.2.1. By Component
        • 9.3.1.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 9.3.1.2.3. By Solution
        • 9.3.1.2.4. By End User
    • 9.3.2. UAE Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.2.2.1. By Component
        • 9.3.2.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 9.3.2.2.3. By Solution
        • 9.3.2.2.4. By End User
    • 9.3.3. South Africa Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.3.2.1. By Component
        • 9.3.3.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 9.3.3.2.3. By Solution
        • 9.3.3.2.4. By End User

10. South America Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook

  • 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 10.1.1. By Value
  • 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 10.2.1. By Component
    • 10.2.2. By Enterprise Size
    • 10.2.3. By Solution
    • 10.2.4. By End User
    • 10.2.5. By Country
  • 10.3. South America: Country Analysis
    • 10.3.1. Brazil Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.1.2.1. By Component
        • 10.3.1.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 10.3.1.2.3. By Solution
        • 10.3.1.2.4. By End User
    • 10.3.2. Colombia Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.2.2.1. By Component
        • 10.3.2.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 10.3.2.2.3. By Solution
        • 10.3.2.2.4. By End User
    • 10.3.3. Argentina Network Security Policy Management Market Outlook
      • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.3.2.1. By Component
        • 10.3.3.2.2. By Enterprise Size
        • 10.3.3.2.3. By Solution
        • 10.3.3.2.4. By End User

11. Market Dynamics

  • 11.1. Drivers
  • 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends & Developments

  • 12.1. Merger & Acquisition (If Any)
  • 12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
  • 12.3. Recent Developments

13. Global Network Security Policy Management Market: SWOT Analysis

14. Porter's Five Forces Analysis

  • 14.1. Competition in the Industry
  • 14.2. Potential of New Entrants
  • 14.3. Power of Suppliers
  • 14.4. Power of Customers
  • 14.5. Threat of Substitute Products

15. Competitive Landscape

  • 15.1. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
    • 15.1.1. Business Overview
    • 15.1.2. Products & Services
    • 15.1.3. Recent Developments
    • 15.1.4. Key Personnel
    • 15.1.5. SWOT Analysis
  • 15.2. AlgoSec Inc.
  • 15.3. Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
  • 15.4. Tufin Software Technologies Ltd.
  • 15.5. FireMon, LLC.
  • 15.6. Forcepoint LLC
  • 15.7. IBM Corporation
  • 15.8. Juniper Networks, Inc.
  • 15.9. Sophos Ltd.
  • 15.10. Cisco Systems, Inc.

16. Strategic Recommendations

17. About Us & Disclaimer