防火墙即服务市场－全球产业规模、份额、趋势、机会和预测（2021-2031 年），按服务类型、服务模式、部署类型、组织规模、最终用户、地区和竞争格局划分

全球防火墙即服务 (FWaaS) 市场预计将从 2025 年的 35.3 亿美元成长到 2031 年的 123.5 亿美元，预测期内复合年增长率 (CAGR) 为 23.21%。 FWaaS 作为以云端为中心的网路安全框架，可提供网路流量侦测和威胁防御，无需部署本地硬体。该领域的成长主要受分散式办公模式和企业云端迁移加速带来的分散式网路保护迫切需求的驱动。这些因素对可扩展的安全架构提出了特殊要求，该架构需最大限度地减少传统实体设备带来的维护负担和地理限制。

然而，由于缺乏能够建构和维护这些虚拟化环境的技术专家，市场快速普及受到阻碍。从旧有系统迁移需要许多内部IT部门所缺乏的专业技能，这可能导致实施延迟和策略配置错误。根据ISACA预测，到2024年，42%的组织将意识到云端运算专业知识方面存在显着缺口。合格人员的匮乏对全球范围内防火墙即服务解决方案的有效部署和管理构成了实际障碍。

市场驱动因素

勒索软体和网路攻击日益频繁且复杂，是推动防火墙即服务 (FaaS) 普及的主要因素。随着攻击者越来越多地使用加密通道来绕过标准边界防御，企业越来越依赖云端原生安全工具，这些工具能够在不引入延迟的情况下检查大量流量。这种转变对于侦测传统本地硬体无法发现的隐藏恶意软体和进阶持续性威胁 (APT) 至关重要。根据 SonicWall 于 2024 年 2 月发布的《2024 年网路威胁报告》的数据，到 2023 年，全球加密威胁将成长 117%，这凸显了深层封包检测功能在现代 FWaaS 解决方案中的重要性。这一增长表明，市场对基于云端的防火墙的依赖性日益增强，以实现跨分散式网路的持续即时威胁防御。

快速的数位转型和向云端环境的大规模迁移也推动了对自适应网路安全架构的需求。随着企业将应用程式和资料从中央资料中心迁移到多重云端环境，实体设备的柔软性成为一个挑战，因此需要一个能够跟上工作负载变化的敏捷安全层。这种营运模式的转变正在推动防火墙即服务 (FWaaS) 的普及，它提供集中式策略控制和无缝扩展能力，以适应不断变化的环境。根据 Fortinet 于 2024 年 6 月发布的《2024 年云端安全报告》，96% 的企业对云端安全表示中度至高度担忧，凸显了保护其不断扩大的数位足迹所面临的压力。因此，经营团队正在优先考虑安全支出以应对这些威胁，安联 2024 年的一项调查也支持了这一趋势。 36% 的受访者将网路安全事件列为全球首要业务风险，证实了防火墙即服务 (FWaaS) 等解决方案的策略必要性。

市场挑战

网路安全专业人才短缺是全球防火墙即服务 (FWaaS) 市场面临的主要阻碍因素。 FWaaS 架构虽然无需实体维护，但却创造了复杂的虚拟化环境，需要高阶云端技术才能有效配置。由于缺乏精通云端原生策略管理的人才，企业难以从传统设备迁移到 FWaaS。这种技能缺口往往会导致营运延误，而安全规则的错位则可能造成严重的安全漏洞和网路延迟，迫使企业推迟全面部署。

人才短缺直接限制了市场成长，因为资源有限的IT部门无法获得先进的安全功能。由于缺乏专业知识，配置错误的风险迫使许多组织继续使用熟悉的硬件，而不是尝试云端迁移，因为他们缺乏应对云端迁移的能力。近期行业统计数据也印证了这一持续存在的人才缺口：根据ISC2预测，到2024年，全球网路安全人才缺口将达到约480万人，67%的组织报告存在人员短缺问题。合格人才的严重短缺阻碍了市场充分发挥其潜力，因为熟练操作人员的供应限制了技术的普及速度。

市场趋势

防火墙即服务 (FWaaS) 和安全存取服务边缘 (SASE) 架构的整合正在从根本上改变市场采购模式。企业不再部署独立的虚拟防火墙，而是越来越多地采用 FWaaS 作为云端原生平台的核心元件，整合安全 Web 闸道和零信任功能。这种转变的驱动力在于，企业需要消除在混合环境中管理分散的安全工具所带来的维运复杂性和可视性不足。在 Palo Alto Networks 于 2024 年 7 月发布的《2024 年云端原生安全状况报告》中，91% 的受访者表示「依赖分散的解决方案会造成盲点，并削弱风险评估和威胁防御能力」。这种整合使企业能够在所有使用者和位置应用统一的安全策略，同时减轻维护独立系统的管理负担。

同时，人工智慧的融入正推动防火墙即服务（FWaaS）从静态过滤工具转变为预测性防御机制。现代平台整合了机器学习演算法，可自动侦测威胁，从而能够识别传统基于特征码的防御手段难以应对的零时差攻击和多态恶意软体。这项技术进步满足了快速缓解威胁的迫切需求，因为人工智慧引擎可以分析流量趋势，并在无需人工干预的情况下即时拦截异常情况。根据Check Point于2024年6月发布的《2024年云端安全报告》，61%的受访者表示，他们的组织正在规划或开发利用人工智慧和机器学习进行网路安全防护。对于希望保护分散式网路免受复杂攻击的企业而言，日益依赖自动化智慧正成为一项标准先决条件。

目录

第一章概述

第二章调查方法

第三章执行摘要

第四章：客户评价

第五章 全球防火墙即服务市场展望

• 市场规模及预测
  • 按金额
• 市占率及预测
  • 依服务类型（流量监控与控制、合规与审核管理、自动化与编配、其他）
  • 依服务模式（基础设施即服务 (IaaS)、平台即服务 (PaaS)、软体即服务(SaaS)）
  • 依部署类型（公共云端、私有云端、混合云端）
  • 依组织规模（中小企业、大型企业）
  • 按最终用户（银行、金融服务和保险、教育、能源和公共产业、政府和公共部门、其他）
  • 按地区
  • 按公司（2025 年）
• 市场地图

6. 北美防火墙即服务市场展望

• 市场规模及预测
• 市占率及预测
• 北美洲：国家分析
  • 美国
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥

7. 欧洲防火墙即服务市场展望

• 市场规模及预测
• 市占率及预测
• 欧洲：国家分析
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 英国
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙

8. 亚太地区防火墙即服务市场展望

• 市场规模及预测
• 市占率及预测
• 亚太地区：国家分析
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 韩国
  • 澳洲

9. 中东和非洲防火墙即服务市场展望

• 市场规模及预测
• 市占率及预测
• 中东和非洲：国家分析
  • 沙乌地阿拉伯
  • 阿拉伯聯合大公国
  • 南非

10. 南美洲防火墙即服务市场展望

• 市场规模及预测
• 市占率及预测
• 南美洲：国家分析
  • 巴西
  • 哥伦比亚
  • 阿根廷

第十一章 市场动态

• 司机
• 任务

第十二章 市场趋势与发展

• 併购
• 产品发布
• 最新进展

第十三章 全球防火墙即服务市场：SWOT分析

第十四章：波特五力分析

• 产业竞争
• 新进入者的可能性
• 供应商电力
• 顾客权力
• 替代品的威胁

第十五章 竞争格局

• Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
• Fortinet, Inc.
• Cisco Systems, Inc.
• Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
• Barracuda Networks, Inc.
• Cato Networks Ltd.
• Cloudflare, Inc.
• Juniper Networks, Inc.
• Zscaler, Inc.
• Forcepoint LLC

第十六章 策略建议

第十七章：关于研究公司及免责声明

The Global Firewall as a Service Market is projected to expand from USD 3.53 Billion in 2025 to USD 12.35 Billion by 2031, registering a CAGR of 23.21% over the forecast period. FWaaS functions as a cloud-centric network security framework that provides traffic inspection and threat prevention over the internet, eliminating the need for on-premises hardware. Growth in this sector is largely fueled by the urgent need to protect decentralized networks arising from distributed workforces and accelerated enterprise cloud migration. These elements generate a specific requirement for scalable security structures that minimize the maintenance burden and geographical limitations linked to conventional physical appliances.

Nevertheless, swift market adoption is hindered by a scarcity of technical professionals capable of configuring and sustaining these virtualized environments. Shifting away from legacy systems requires specialized skills that numerous internal IT departments lack, which can result in deployment setbacks or incorrect policy settings. According to ISACA, 42% of organizations identified substantial gaps in their cloud computing expertise in 2024. This lack of qualified personnel poses a concrete obstacle to the effective implementation and administration of global Firewall as a Service solutions.

Market Driver

The rising frequency and complexity of ransomware and cyberattacks act as a major driver for the implementation of Firewall as a Service solutions. With attackers increasingly using encrypted channels to evade standard perimeter defenses, businesses are forced to adopt cloud-native security tools that can inspect high volumes of traffic without causing delays. This transition is essential for detecting hidden malware and advanced persistent threats that traditional on-premises hardware frequently misses. Data from SonicWall's '2024 Cyber Threat Report' in February 2024 indicates that encrypted threats rose by 117% globally in 2023, emphasizing the critical need for the deep packet inspection features found in modern FWaaS. This increase highlights the market's dependence on cloud-based firewalls for continuous, real-time threat prevention across distributed networks.

Rapid digital transformation and extensive migration to cloud environments also boost the demand for adaptable network security architectures. As organizations move applications and data from central data centers to multi-cloud ecosystems, the inflexibility of physical appliances becomes a disadvantage, requiring agile security layers that accompany workloads. This operational change fosters the adoption of FWaaS, which provides centralized policy control and smooth scalability for changing environments. According to Fortinet's '2024 Cloud Security Report' from June 2024, 96% of organizations express moderate to extreme concern regarding cloud security, indicating the pressure to protect growing digital footprints. As a result, executives are prioritizing security spending to address these dangers, a sentiment reinforced by Allianz in 2024, where cyber incidents were cited as the top global business risk by 36% of respondents, confirming the strategic necessity of solutions like Firewall as a Service.

Market Challenge

A lack of specialized cybersecurity professionals serves as a significant constraint on the Global Firewall as a Service Market. Although FWaaS architectures eliminate the need for physical maintenance, they create complex virtualized environments that demand high-level cloud expertise for effective configuration. Without staff proficient in cloud-native policy management, companies find it difficult to move away from legacy appliances. This skills gap frequently leads to operational slowdowns, where the failure to correctly adjust security rules results in severe vulnerabilities or network lag, causing enterprises to postpone comprehensive deployment.

This shortage of personnel directly restricts market growth by making advanced security capabilities unreachable for IT departments with limited resources. The danger of misconfiguration arising from insufficient expertise compels many businesses to stick with familiar hardware instead of attempting a cloud migration they are ill-equipped to handle. This persistent gap is underscored by recent industry statistics; according to ISC2, the global cybersecurity workforce deficit hit roughly 4.8 million professionals in 2024, with 67% of organizations citing staffing deficiencies. Such a severe lack of qualified human capital hinders the market from achieving its full potential, as the pace of adoption is limited by the supply of skilled operators.

Market Trends

The merging of Firewall as a Service with Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) architecture is radically altering market procurement approaches. Rather than implementing standalone virtual firewalls, businesses are increasingly adopting FWaaS as a central element of integrated cloud-native platforms that combine Secure Web Gateway and Zero Trust features. This transition is motivated by the need to remove operational complexities and visibility deficiencies resulting from the management of disjointed security tools in hybrid settings. In the 'State of Cloud-Native Security 2024 Report' published by Palo Alto Networks in July 2024, 91% of participants indicated that dependence on point solutions generates blind spots that impair their capacity to assess risk and stop threats. This unification enables companies to apply uniform security policies for all users and locations while lowering the administrative strain of sustaining separate systems.

Simultaneously, the incorporation of artificial intelligence is evolving FWaaS from a static filtering tool into a predictive defense mechanism. Contemporary platforms are integrating machine learning algorithms to automate the detection of threats, facilitating the recognition of zero-day exploits and polymorphic malware that evade conventional signature-based measures. This technological advancement meets the urgent requirement for rapid mitigation, as AI-powered engines can examine traffic trends and intercept anomalies in real-time without human interference. According to Check Point's '2024 Cloud Security Report' from June 2024, 61% of respondents admitted that their organizations are in the planning or development stages of utilizing AI and machine learning for cybersecurity purposes. This increasing dependence on automated intelligence is becoming a standard prerequisite for enterprises aiming to protect their decentralized networks from complex attacks.

Key Market Players

• Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
• Fortinet, Inc.
• Cisco Systems, Inc.
• Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
• Barracuda Networks, Inc.
• Cato Networks Ltd.
• Cloudflare, Inc.
• Juniper Networks, Inc.
• Zscaler, Inc.
• Forcepoint LLC

Report Scope

In this report, the Global Firewall as a Service Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Firewall as a Service Market, By Service Type

• Traffic monitoring & control
• Compliance & Audit Management
• Automation & Orchestration
• Others

Firewall as a Service Market, By Service Model

• Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
• Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS)
• Software-as-a-Service (SaaS)

Firewall as a Service Market, By Deployment Mode

• Public Cloud
• Private Cloud
• Hybrid Cloud

Firewall as a Service Market, By Organization Size

• SMEs
• Large Enterprises

Firewall as a Service Market, By End User

• BFSI
• Education
• Energy & Utilities
• Government & Public Sector
• Others

Firewall as a Service Market, By Region

• North America
  • United States
  • Canada
  • Mexico
• Europe
  • France
  • United Kingdom
  • Italy
  • Germany
  • Spain
• Asia Pacific
  • China
  • India
  • Japan
  • Australia
  • South Korea
• South America
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Colombia
• Middle East & Africa
  • South Africa
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Firewall as a Service Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Firewall as a Service Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

• Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

• 1.1. Market Definition
• 1.2. Scope of the Market
  • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
  • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
  • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Objective of the Study
• 2.2. Baseline Methodology
• 2.3. Key Industry Partners
• 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
• 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
• 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
• 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Overview of the Market
• 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
• 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
• 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
• 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Firewall as a Service Market Outlook

• 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 5.1.1. By Value
• 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 5.2.1. By Service Type (Traffic monitoring & control, Compliance & Audit Management, Automation & Orchestration, Others)
  • 5.2.2. By Service Model (Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS), Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS), Software-as-a-Service (SaaS))
  • 5.2.3. By Deployment Mode (Public Cloud, Private Cloud, Hybrid Cloud)
  • 5.2.4. By Organization Size (SMEs, Large Enterprises)
  • 5.2.5. By End User (BFSI, Education, Energy & Utilities, Government & Public Sector, Others)
  • 5.2.6. By Region
  • 5.2.7. By Company (2025)
• 5.3. Market Map

6. North America Firewall as a Service Market Outlook

• 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 6.1.1. By Value
• 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 6.2.1. By Service Type
  • 6.2.2. By Service Model
  • 6.2.3. By Deployment Mode
  • 6.2.4. By Organization Size
  • 6.2.5. By End User
  • 6.2.6. By Country
• 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
  • 6.3.1. United States Firewall as a Service Market Outlook
    • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.2.1. By Service Type
      • 6.3.1.2.2. By Service Model
      • 6.3.1.2.3. By Deployment Mode
      • 6.3.1.2.4. By Organization Size
      • 6.3.1.2.5. By End User
  • 6.3.2. Canada Firewall as a Service Market Outlook
    • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.2.1. By Service Type
      • 6.3.2.2.2. By Service Model
      • 6.3.2.2.3. By Deployment Mode
      • 6.3.2.2.4. By Organization Size
      • 6.3.2.2.5. By End User
  • 6.3.3. Mexico Firewall as a Service Market Outlook
    • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.2.1. By Service Type
      • 6.3.3.2.2. By Service Model
      • 6.3.3.2.3. By Deployment Mode
      • 6.3.3.2.4. By Organization Size
      • 6.3.3.2.5. By End User

7. Europe Firewall as a Service Market Outlook

• 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 7.1.1. By Value
• 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 7.2.1. By Service Type
  • 7.2.2. By Service Model
  • 7.2.3. By Deployment Mode
  • 7.2.4. By Organization Size
  • 7.2.5. By End User
  • 7.2.6. By Country
• 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
  • 7.3.1. Germany Firewall as a Service Market Outlook
    • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.2.1. By Service Type
      • 7.3.1.2.2. By Service Model
      • 7.3.1.2.3. By Deployment Mode
      • 7.3.1.2.4. By Organization Size
      • 7.3.1.2.5. By End User
  • 7.3.2. France Firewall as a Service Market Outlook
    • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.2.1. By Service Type
      • 7.3.2.2.2. By Service Model
      • 7.3.2.2.3. By Deployment Mode
      • 7.3.2.2.4. By Organization Size
      • 7.3.2.2.5. By End User
  • 7.3.3. United Kingdom Firewall as a Service Market Outlook
    • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.2.1. By Service Type
      • 7.3.3.2.2. By Service Model
      • 7.3.3.2.3. By Deployment Mode
      • 7.3.3.2.4. By Organization Size
      • 7.3.3.2.5. By End User
  • 7.3.4. Italy Firewall as a Service Market Outlook
    • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.2.1. By Service Type
      • 7.3.4.2.2. By Service Model
      • 7.3.4.2.3. By Deployment Mode
      • 7.3.4.2.4. By Organization Size
      • 7.3.4.2.5. By End User
  • 7.3.5. Spain Firewall as a Service Market Outlook
    • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.2.1. By Service Type
      • 7.3.5.2.2. By Service Model
      • 7.3.5.2.3. By Deployment Mode
      • 7.3.5.2.4. By Organization Size
      • 7.3.5.2.5. By End User

8. Asia Pacific Firewall as a Service Market Outlook

• 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 8.1.1. By Value
• 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 8.2.1. By Service Type
  • 8.2.2. By Service Model
  • 8.2.3. By Deployment Mode
  • 8.2.4. By Organization Size
  • 8.2.5. By End User
  • 8.2.6. By Country
• 8.3. Asia Pacific: Country Analysis
  • 8.3.1. China Firewall as a Service Market Outlook
    • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.2.1. By Service Type
      • 8.3.1.2.2. By Service Model
      • 8.3.1.2.3. By Deployment Mode
      • 8.3.1.2.4. By Organization Size
      • 8.3.1.2.5. By End User
  • 8.3.2. India Firewall as a Service Market Outlook
    • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.2.1. By Service Type
      • 8.3.2.2.2. By Service Model
      • 8.3.2.2.3. By Deployment Mode
      • 8.3.2.2.4. By Organization Size
      • 8.3.2.2.5. By End User
  • 8.3.3. Japan Firewall as a Service Market Outlook
    • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.2.1. By Service Type
      • 8.3.3.2.2. By Service Model
      • 8.3.3.2.3. By Deployment Mode
      • 8.3.3.2.4. By Organization Size
      • 8.3.3.2.5. By End User
  • 8.3.4. South Korea Firewall as a Service Market Outlook
    • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.2.1. By Service Type
      • 8.3.4.2.2. By Service Model
      • 8.3.4.2.3. By Deployment Mode
      • 8.3.4.2.4. By Organization Size
      • 8.3.4.2.5. By End User
  • 8.3.5. Australia Firewall as a Service Market Outlook
    • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.2.1. By Service Type
      • 8.3.5.2.2. By Service Model
      • 8.3.5.2.3. By Deployment Mode
      • 8.3.5.2.4. By Organization Size
      • 8.3.5.2.5. By End User

9. Middle East & Africa Firewall as a Service Market Outlook

• 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.1.1. By Value
• 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 9.2.1. By Service Type
  • 9.2.2. By Service Model
  • 9.2.3. By Deployment Mode
  • 9.2.4. By Organization Size
  • 9.2.5. By End User
  • 9.2.6. By Country
• 9.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
  • 9.3.1. Saudi Arabia Firewall as a Service Market Outlook
    • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.2.1. By Service Type
      • 9.3.1.2.2. By Service Model
      • 9.3.1.2.3. By Deployment Mode
      • 9.3.1.2.4. By Organization Size
      • 9.3.1.2.5. By End User
  • 9.3.2. UAE Firewall as a Service Market Outlook
    • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.2.1. By Service Type
      • 9.3.2.2.2. By Service Model
      • 9.3.2.2.3. By Deployment Mode
      • 9.3.2.2.4. By Organization Size
      • 9.3.2.2.5. By End User
  • 9.3.3. South Africa Firewall as a Service Market Outlook
    • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.2.1. By Service Type
      • 9.3.3.2.2. By Service Model
      • 9.3.3.2.3. By Deployment Mode
      • 9.3.3.2.4. By Organization Size
      • 9.3.3.2.5. By End User

10. South America Firewall as a Service Market Outlook

• 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 10.1.1. By Value
• 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 10.2.1. By Service Type
  • 10.2.2. By Service Model
  • 10.2.3. By Deployment Mode
  • 10.2.4. By Organization Size
  • 10.2.5. By End User
  • 10.2.6. By Country
• 10.3. South America: Country Analysis
  • 10.3.1. Brazil Firewall as a Service Market Outlook
    • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.2.1. By Service Type
      • 10.3.1.2.2. By Service Model
      • 10.3.1.2.3. By Deployment Mode
      • 10.3.1.2.4. By Organization Size
      • 10.3.1.2.5. By End User
  • 10.3.2. Colombia Firewall as a Service Market Outlook
    • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.2.1. By Service Type
      • 10.3.2.2.2. By Service Model
      • 10.3.2.2.3. By Deployment Mode
      • 10.3.2.2.4. By Organization Size
      • 10.3.2.2.5. By End User
  • 10.3.3. Argentina Firewall as a Service Market Outlook
    • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.2.1. By Service Type
      • 10.3.3.2.2. By Service Model
      • 10.3.3.2.3. By Deployment Mode
      • 10.3.3.2.4. By Organization Size
      • 10.3.3.2.5. By End User

11. Market Dynamics

• 11.1. Drivers
• 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends & Developments

• 12.1. Merger & Acquisition (If Any)
• 12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
• 12.3. Recent Developments

13. Global Firewall as a Service Market: SWOT Analysis

14. Porter's Five Forces Analysis

• 14.1. Competition in the Industry
• 14.2. Potential of New Entrants
• 14.3. Power of Suppliers
• 14.4. Power of Customers
• 14.5. Threat of Substitute Products

15. Competitive Landscape

• 15.1. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
  • 15.1.1. Business Overview
  • 15.1.2. Products & Services
  • 15.1.3. Recent Developments
  • 15.1.4. Key Personnel
  • 15.1.5. SWOT Analysis
• 15.2. Fortinet, Inc.
• 15.3. Cisco Systems, Inc.
• 15.4. Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
• 15.5. Barracuda Networks, Inc.
• 15.6. Cato Networks Ltd.
• 15.7. Cloudflare, Inc.
• 15.8. Juniper Networks, Inc.
• 15.9. Zscaler, Inc.
• 15.10. Forcepoint LLC

16. Strategic Recommendations

17. About Us & Disclaimer