重症监护资讯系统市场－全球产业规模、份额、趋势、机会和预测：按组件、部署模式、应用、最终用户、地区和竞争格局划分，2021-2031年

全球重症监护资讯系统市场预计将从 2025 年的 45.8 亿美元成长到 2031 年的 80.8 亿美元，复合年增长率为 9.92%。

这些系统旨在作为数位化解决方案，实现加护病房病患资料收集和管理的自动化，透过整合生命征象和临床记录，实现即时监测。市场成长的主要驱动因素是全球人口老化、需要入住加护病房的慢性病患者数量增加，以及医疗保健产业向无纸化系统转型以减少医疗差错和简化临床工作流程。

同时，将这些平台与传统电子病历系统整合面临巨大的营运障碍。资料孤岛和标准不一致造成的技术障碍往往会增加实施成本和复杂性。例如，医疗资讯与管理系统协会 (HIMSS) 报告称，到 2024 年，57% 的医生认为互通性是最大限度发挥医疗资讯科技效用的主要障碍。这种无缝连接的缺失限制了高效的资料交换，并可能阻碍重症监护资讯系统在复杂医疗网路中的广泛应用。

市场驱动因素

远距ICU和远距监护功能的需求不断增长，成为市场扩张的关键催化剂，从根本上改变了人员短缺情况下重症监护的提供方式。由于医疗机构面临着熟练加护病房医师严重短缺的问题，集中式数位化监护解决方案对于最大限度地利用多地专家资源至关重要。透过实现床边设备与远端指挥中心之间的即时数据传输，临床团队能够在不影响安全性的前提下监测更多患者。皇家飞利浦于2024年6月发布的《2024年未来健康指数》也印证了这个趋势。该指数显示，89%的医疗机构领导者认为，虚拟医疗和远距监护技术显着缓解了人员短缺带来的挑战，有助于持续观察和及时介入。

同时，鼓励电子健康记录整合的政府法规和财政奖励正在推动全球重症监护基础设施的结构性现代化。监管机构正日益将资金和报销与采用可互通的数位健康标准挂钩，迫使医院打破传统的资料孤岛。例如，英国财政部在2024年春季预算中拨款34亿英镑用于英国国家医疗服务体系（NHS）的数位化转型，以更新IT系统并提高效率，从而有效降低了采用先进临床资讯系统的门槛。营运效益显着：根据Oracle公司2024年的报告，早期采用下一代临床数位助理的机构文件处理时间减少了20%至40%，凸显了政府支持的倡议所带来的效率提升。

市场挑战

全球重症监护资讯系统市场面临的主要营运障碍之一是新兴数位解决方案与现有电子健康记录 (EHR) 之间缺乏无缝互通性。儘管这些系统旨在集中管理生命征象和临床数据，但技术标准的不一致常常导致资讯碎片化。这种整合不足迫使医疗机构面临高昂的客製化成本和漫长的实施週期，从而降低了科技在医院网路中的经济吸引力和扩充性。

此外，资料交换不便会扰乱临床工作流程，并导致潜在买家因担心营运效率降低而犹豫不决。如果系统之间缺乏有效的协作，临床医生将难以获得完整的患者病史，从而有效地抵消了这些工具所承诺的节省时间的优势。根据美国家庭医学委员会 (ABFM) 2024 年的一项调查，仅有 8% 的医生认为从不同电子健康记录 (EHR) 开发商的系统中获取的资讯「非常易于使用」。如此低的可用性比例凸显了整合挑战的严峻性，并直接阻碍了市场成长，因为越来越多的医疗机构为了避免增加技术负担而推迟采购决策。

市场趋势

将人工智慧 (AI) 应用于预测分析正在革新重症监护，使工作流程从被动监测转变为主动风险管理。先进的演算法现在可以分析即时患者数据，并检测出先于败血症和心臟麻痹等危及生命的事件领先的细微生理模式。这使得临床团队能够在患者病情恶化前数小时进行干预，从而显着提高对时间要求极高的加护病房的生存率。正如 2024 年 8 月 HCPLive 的一篇报导《新型 AI 工具可在四小时内预测脓毒症风险》中所述，将高价值的患者变量添加到 SepsisLab 演算法中，使脓毒症预测准确率提高了 11%，这充分展现了 AI 驱动的精准医疗在高危医疗环境中的切实临床益处。

同时，在扩充性基础架构的需求驱动下，市场正经历着向云端和SaaS部署模式的重大转变，以支援复杂的资料环境。传统的本地伺服器难以应对现代互联设备产生的大量数据，迫使医院转向灵活的云端架构，以确保无缝更新和远端存取。这种转变降低了初始资本支出，同时增强了应对故障的復原力。根据CDW于2024年10月发布的《2024年云端运算调查报告》，63%的医疗保健IT领导者认为「更高的可靠性」和「灾害復原能力」是公共云端基础设施的关键优势，证实了这种转变对于维持关键医疗服务的连续性具有重要的战略意义。

目录

第一章概述

第二章调查方法

第三章执行摘要

第四章：客户评价

第五章 全球重症监护资讯系统市场展望

• 市场规模及预测
  • 按金额
• 市占率及预测
  • 按组件（软体、硬体、服务）
  • 依部署类型（本机部署、云端部署）
  • 按应用领域（病患监测、药物管理、临床文件、决策支援、工作流程管理）
  • 按最终使用者（医院、加护病房、门诊手术中心等）
  • 按地区
  • 按公司（2025 年）
• 市场地图

6. 北美重症监护资讯系统市场展望

• 市场规模及预测
• 市占率及预测
• 北美洲：国家分析
  • 我们
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥

7. 欧洲重症监护资讯系统市场展望

• 市场规模及预测
• 市占率及预测
• 欧洲：国家分析
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 英国
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙

8. 亚太地区重症监护资讯系统市场展望

• 市场规模及预测
• 市占率及预测
• 亚太地区：国家分析
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 韩国
  • 澳洲

9. 中东和非洲重症监护资讯系统市场展望

• 市场规模及预测
• 市占率及预测
• 中东和非洲：国家分析
  • 沙乌地阿拉伯
  • 阿拉伯聯合大公国
  • 南非

第十章：南美洲重症监护资讯系统市场展望

• 市场规模及预测
• 市占率及预测
• 南美洲：国家分析
  • 巴西
  • 哥伦比亚
  • 阿根廷

第十一章 市场动态

• 司机
• 任务

第十二章 市场趋势与发展

• 併购
• 产品发布
• 最新进展

第十三章 全球重症资讯系统市场：SWOT分析

第十四章：波特五力分析

• 产业竞争
• 新进入者的可能性
• 供应商电力
• 顾客权力
• 替代品的威胁

第十五章 竞争格局

• Siemens Healthineers AG
• Cerner Corporation
• McKesson Corporation
• Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, LLC
• DXC Technology Company
• Picis Clinical Solutions, Inc.
• United HealthCare Services, Inc.
• Masimo Corporation
• InterSystems Corporation
• Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc.

第十六章 策略建议

第十七章：关于研究公司及免责声明

The Global Critical Care Information System Market is projected to expand from USD 4.58 billion in 2025 to USD 8.08 billion by 2031, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of 9.92%. These systems serve as digital solutions designed to automate the collection and management of patient data within intensive care units by integrating vital signs with clinical records for real-time monitoring. The market's growth is largely fueled by an aging global population and the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases requiring critical care admissions, alongside a healthcare sector shift toward paperless operations to reduce medical errors and improve clinical workflow efficiency.

Conversely, integrating these platforms with legacy electronic health records presents a major operational hurdle. Technical barriers arising from data silos and inconsistent standards often inflate implementation costs and complexity. For instance, the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society reported in 2024 that 57% of physicians viewed interoperability as the main obstacle to maximizing health information technology's utility. This lack of seamless connectivity limits efficient data exchange and potentially hinders the broader adoption of critical care information systems across complex healthcare networks.

Market Driver

The escalating demand for tele-ICU and remote monitoring capabilities acts as a primary catalyst for market expansion, fundamentally transforming critical care delivery amidst workforce constraints. With healthcare facilities facing a severe shortage of skilled intensivists, centralized digital monitoring solutions are now essential for maximizing expertise across multiple locations. By enabling real-time data transmission from bedside devices to off-site command centers, clinical teams can monitor a larger patient volume without sacrificing safety. This trend is corroborated by Royal Philips' "Future Health Index 2024" from June 2024, in which 89% of healthcare leaders indicated that virtual care and remote monitoring technologies positively alleviated challenges related to staff shortages, thereby facilitating continuous observation and timely interventions.

Concurrently, government mandates and financial incentives favoring electronic medical record integration are necessitating a structural modernization of critical care infrastructure worldwide. Regulatory bodies increasingly tie funding and reimbursement to the adoption of interoperable digital health standards, forcing hospitals to eliminate legacy data silos. For example, HM Treasury's "Spring Budget 2024" allocated £3.4 billion for NHS digitization to upgrade IT systems and boost productivity, effectively lowering entry barriers for advanced clinical information systems. The operational benefits are significant; according to Oracle in 2024, early adopters of next-generation clinical digital assistants reduced documentation time by 20% to 40%, underscoring the efficiency gains driving these government-backed initiatives.

Market Challenge

The principal operational obstacle hindering the Global Critical Care Information System Market is the absence of seamless interoperability between emerging digital solutions and established electronic health records. While these systems are designed to centralize vital signs and clinical data, inconsistent technical standards frequently lead to fragmented information environments. This disconnect compels healthcare facilities to face elevated customization costs and protracted implementation timelines, thereby diminishing the financial appeal and scalability of deploying these technologies across hospital networks.

Moreover, the inability to exchange data effortlessly disrupts clinical workflows, instilling hesitation among potential buyers concerned about operational inefficiencies. When systems fail to communicate effectively, clinicians struggle to access comprehensive patient histories, effectively neutralizing the time-saving advantages these tools promise. According to the American Board of Family Medicine in 2024, only 8% of physicians found information retrieved from different electronic health record developers' systems very easy to use. This strikingly low usability rate emphasizes the severity of integration challenges, directly curbing market growth as institutions postpone purchasing decisions to avoid increasing their technical burdens.

Market Trends

The integration of Artificial Intelligence for Predictive Analytics is revolutionizing critical care by shifting workflows from reactive monitoring to proactive risk management. Advanced algorithms are now capable of analyzing real-time patient data to detect subtle physiological patterns that precede life-threatening events such as sepsis or cardiac arrest. This allows clinical teams to intervene hours before patient deterioration, significantly enhancing survival rates in time-sensitive intensive care units. As noted by HCPLive in August 2024 regarding the "New AI Tool Predicts Sepsis Risk Within 4 Hours," adding high-value patient variables to the SepsisLab algorithm increased sepsis prediction accuracy by 11%, illustrating the tangible clinical benefits of AI-driven precision in high-acuity settings.

Simultaneously, the market is undergoing a decisive shift toward cloud-based and SaaS deployment models, driven by the requirement for scalable infrastructure to support complex data environments. Legacy on-premise servers frequently struggle to manage the massive data volumes generated by modern connected devices, prompting hospitals to migrate to flexible cloud architectures that ensure seamless updates and remote accessibility. This transition reduces upfront capital expenditures while boosting system resilience against outages. According to the CDW "2024 Cloud Computing Research Report" from October 2024, 63% of healthcare IT leaders pinpointed greater reliability and disaster recovery capabilities as the primary advantages of public cloud infrastructure, validating the strategic importance of this migration for maintaining critical care continuity.

Key Market Players

• Siemens Healthineers AG
• Cerner Corporation
• McKesson Corporation
• Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, LLC
• DXC Technology Company
• Picis Clinical Solutions, Inc.
• United HealthCare Services, Inc.
• Masimo Corporation
• InterSystems Corporation
• Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc.

Report Scope

In this report, the Global Critical Care Information System Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Critical Care Information System Market, By Component

• Software
• Hardware
• Services

Critical Care Information System Market, By Deployment Mode

• On-Premises
• Cloud-Based

Critical Care Information System Market, By Application

• Patient Monitoring
• Medication Management
• Clinical Documentation
• Decision Support
• Workflow Management

Critical Care Information System Market, By End User

• Hospitals
• Intensive Care Units
• Ambulatory Surgical Center
• Others

Critical Care Information System Market, By Region

• North America
  • United States
  • Canada
  • Mexico
• Europe
  • France
  • United Kingdom
  • Italy
  • Germany
  • Spain
• Asia Pacific
  • China
  • India
  • Japan
  • Australia
  • South Korea
• South America
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Colombia
• Middle East & Africa
  • South Africa
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Critical Care Information System Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Critical Care Information System Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

• Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

• 1.1. Market Definition
• 1.2. Scope of the Market
  • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
  • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
  • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Objective of the Study
• 2.2. Baseline Methodology
• 2.3. Key Industry Partners
• 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
• 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
• 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
• 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Overview of the Market
• 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
• 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
• 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
• 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Critical Care Information System Market Outlook

• 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 5.1.1. By Value
• 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 5.2.1. By Component (Software, Hardware, Services)
  • 5.2.2. By Deployment Mode (On-Premises, Cloud-Based)
  • 5.2.3. By Application (Patient Monitoring, Medication Management, Clinical Documentation, Decision Support, Workflow Management)
  • 5.2.4. By End User (Hospitals, Intensive Care Units, Ambulatory Surgical Center, Others)
  • 5.2.5. By Region
  • 5.2.6. By Company (2025)
• 5.3. Market Map

6. North America Critical Care Information System Market Outlook

• 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 6.1.1. By Value
• 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 6.2.1. By Component
  • 6.2.2. By Deployment Mode
  • 6.2.3. By Application
  • 6.2.4. By End User
  • 6.2.5. By Country
• 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
  • 6.3.1. United States Critical Care Information System Market Outlook
    • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.2.1. By Component
      • 6.3.1.2.2. By Deployment Mode
      • 6.3.1.2.3. By Application
      • 6.3.1.2.4. By End User
  • 6.3.2. Canada Critical Care Information System Market Outlook
    • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.2.1. By Component
      • 6.3.2.2.2. By Deployment Mode
      • 6.3.2.2.3. By Application
      • 6.3.2.2.4. By End User
  • 6.3.3. Mexico Critical Care Information System Market Outlook
    • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.2.1. By Component
      • 6.3.3.2.2. By Deployment Mode
      • 6.3.3.2.3. By Application
      • 6.3.3.2.4. By End User

7. Europe Critical Care Information System Market Outlook

• 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 7.1.1. By Value
• 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 7.2.1. By Component
  • 7.2.2. By Deployment Mode
  • 7.2.3. By Application
  • 7.2.4. By End User
  • 7.2.5. By Country
• 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
  • 7.3.1. Germany Critical Care Information System Market Outlook
    • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.2.1. By Component
      • 7.3.1.2.2. By Deployment Mode
      • 7.3.1.2.3. By Application
      • 7.3.1.2.4. By End User
  • 7.3.2. France Critical Care Information System Market Outlook
    • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.2.1. By Component
      • 7.3.2.2.2. By Deployment Mode
      • 7.3.2.2.3. By Application
      • 7.3.2.2.4. By End User
  • 7.3.3. United Kingdom Critical Care Information System Market Outlook
    • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.2.1. By Component
      • 7.3.3.2.2. By Deployment Mode
      • 7.3.3.2.3. By Application
      • 7.3.3.2.4. By End User
  • 7.3.4. Italy Critical Care Information System Market Outlook
    • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.2.1. By Component
      • 7.3.4.2.2. By Deployment Mode
      • 7.3.4.2.3. By Application
      • 7.3.4.2.4. By End User
  • 7.3.5. Spain Critical Care Information System Market Outlook
    • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.2.1. By Component
      • 7.3.5.2.2. By Deployment Mode
      • 7.3.5.2.3. By Application
      • 7.3.5.2.4. By End User

8. Asia Pacific Critical Care Information System Market Outlook

• 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 8.1.1. By Value
• 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 8.2.1. By Component
  • 8.2.2. By Deployment Mode
  • 8.2.3. By Application
  • 8.2.4. By End User
  • 8.2.5. By Country
• 8.3. Asia Pacific: Country Analysis
  • 8.3.1. China Critical Care Information System Market Outlook
    • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.2.1. By Component
      • 8.3.1.2.2. By Deployment Mode
      • 8.3.1.2.3. By Application
      • 8.3.1.2.4. By End User
  • 8.3.2. India Critical Care Information System Market Outlook
    • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.2.1. By Component
      • 8.3.2.2.2. By Deployment Mode
      • 8.3.2.2.3. By Application
      • 8.3.2.2.4. By End User
  • 8.3.3. Japan Critical Care Information System Market Outlook
    • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.2.1. By Component
      • 8.3.3.2.2. By Deployment Mode
      • 8.3.3.2.3. By Application
      • 8.3.3.2.4. By End User
  • 8.3.4. South Korea Critical Care Information System Market Outlook
    • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.2.1. By Component
      • 8.3.4.2.2. By Deployment Mode
      • 8.3.4.2.3. By Application
      • 8.3.4.2.4. By End User
  • 8.3.5. Australia Critical Care Information System Market Outlook
    • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.2.1. By Component
      • 8.3.5.2.2. By Deployment Mode
      • 8.3.5.2.3. By Application
      • 8.3.5.2.4. By End User

9. Middle East & Africa Critical Care Information System Market Outlook

• 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.1.1. By Value
• 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 9.2.1. By Component
  • 9.2.2. By Deployment Mode
  • 9.2.3. By Application
  • 9.2.4. By End User
  • 9.2.5. By Country
• 9.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
  • 9.3.1. Saudi Arabia Critical Care Information System Market Outlook
    • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.2.1. By Component
      • 9.3.1.2.2. By Deployment Mode
      • 9.3.1.2.3. By Application
      • 9.3.1.2.4. By End User
  • 9.3.2. UAE Critical Care Information System Market Outlook
    • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.2.1. By Component
      • 9.3.2.2.2. By Deployment Mode
      • 9.3.2.2.3. By Application
      • 9.3.2.2.4. By End User
  • 9.3.3. South Africa Critical Care Information System Market Outlook
    • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.2.1. By Component
      • 9.3.3.2.2. By Deployment Mode
      • 9.3.3.2.3. By Application
      • 9.3.3.2.4. By End User

10. South America Critical Care Information System Market Outlook

• 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 10.1.1. By Value
• 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 10.2.1. By Component
  • 10.2.2. By Deployment Mode
  • 10.2.3. By Application
  • 10.2.4. By End User
  • 10.2.5. By Country
• 10.3. South America: Country Analysis
  • 10.3.1. Brazil Critical Care Information System Market Outlook
    • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.2.1. By Component
      • 10.3.1.2.2. By Deployment Mode
      • 10.3.1.2.3. By Application
      • 10.3.1.2.4. By End User
  • 10.3.2. Colombia Critical Care Information System Market Outlook
    • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.2.1. By Component
      • 10.3.2.2.2. By Deployment Mode
      • 10.3.2.2.3. By Application
      • 10.3.2.2.4. By End User
  • 10.3.3. Argentina Critical Care Information System Market Outlook
    • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.2.1. By Component
      • 10.3.3.2.2. By Deployment Mode
      • 10.3.3.2.3. By Application
      • 10.3.3.2.4. By End User

11. Market Dynamics

• 11.1. Drivers
• 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends & Developments

• 12.1. Merger & Acquisition (If Any)
• 12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
• 12.3. Recent Developments

13. Global Critical Care Information System Market: SWOT Analysis

14. Porter's Five Forces Analysis

• 14.1. Competition in the Industry
• 14.2. Potential of New Entrants
• 14.3. Power of Suppliers
• 14.4. Power of Customers
• 14.5. Threat of Substitute Products

15. Competitive Landscape

• 15.1. Siemens Healthineers AG
  • 15.1.1. Business Overview
  • 15.1.2. Products & Services
  • 15.1.3. Recent Developments
  • 15.1.4. Key Personnel
  • 15.1.5. SWOT Analysis
• 15.2. Cerner Corporation
• 15.3. McKesson Corporation
• 15.4. Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, LLC
• 15.5. DXC Technology Company
• 15.6. Picis Clinical Solutions, Inc.
• 15.7. United HealthCare Services, Inc.
• 15.8. Masimo Corporation
• 15.9. InterSystems Corporation
• 15.10. Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc.

16. Strategic Recommendations

17. About Us & Disclaimer