查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1967749

结构健康监测市场 - 全球产业规模、份额、趋势、机会、预测（按产品、技术、最终用途、地区和竞争格局划分），2021-2031年

Structural Health Monitoring Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, By Offering, By Technology, By End Use, By Region & Competition, 2021-2031F
出版日期: | 出版商: TechSci Research | 英文 181 Pages | 商品交期: 2-3个工作天内

价格

We offer 8 hour analyst time for an additional research. Please contact us for the details.

简介目录

全球结构健康监测市场预计将从 2025 年的 35.7 亿美元稳步成长到 2031 年的 66.1 亿美元，复合年增长率为 10.81%。

在该领域，感测器整合和资料传输系统被用于持续监测土木和机械基础设施的物理状态。市场的主要驱动因素是延长老旧资产运作的迫切需求以及日益严格的政府安全法规。此外，关键结构的劣化也使得预测性维护策略的实施即时。例如，美国公路交通与建设业协会（ARTBA）在2024年发布的报告显示，全国36%的桥樑将需要进行重大维修或彻底更换，凸显了监测技术在确定维修工作优先顺序方面发挥的关键作用。

市场概览
预测期 2027-2031
市场规模：2025年 35.7亿美元
市场规模：2031年 66.1亿美元
复合年增长率：2026-2031年 10.81%
成长最快的细分市场 软体
最大的市场 北美洲

儘管有这些有利的成长要素，市场仍面临一个重大障碍：安装和调试复杂监测设备所需的高额初始投资。在庞大的基础设施网路中，这个财务难题尤其突出，因为测量设备的成本往往与用于实际结构维修的有限预算直接竞争。因此，这些巨额的领先成本，加上处理海量感测器资料的技术复杂性，可能会减缓成本敏感型工业领域的广泛应用。

市场驱动因素

可再生能源基础设施的成长正大大推动结构完整性监测技术的应用。随着各国向永续能源转型，风力发电设施（尤其是在海上环境）的部署需要严格且持续的监测，以识别因恶劣运作条件导致的材料疲劳和结构异常。这种运作需求促使感测器整合到系统中，旨在最大限度地减少停机时间并优化能源生产。根据全球风力发电理事会 (GWEC) 于 2024 年 4 月发布的《2024 年全球风能报告》，2023 年全球整体风电产业新增装置容量达到创纪录的 117 吉瓦。同时，对能够确保涡轮机基础和叶片长期可靠性的监测系统的需求也随之增加。

此外，政府资金投入和公私合营在基础设施投资领域正透过克服资金障碍加速市场渗透。对交通网路的大量资本投资使营运商能够部署先进的诊断工具，以确保公共和合规性。例如，美国运输部在2024年7月的新闻稿中宣布，拜登-哈里斯政府将拨款超过50亿美元用于大型桥樑重组和维修计划，并直接支持在关键交通走廊实施监测解决方案。此外，联合太平洋铁路公司计划在2024年投资34亿美元用于升级和维护网路基础设施，凸显了大规模投资。

市场挑战

安装和配置监测设备所需的高额初始资本投入是全球结构健康监测市场扩张的主要障碍。资产所有者往往面临资金紧张的局面，硬体、布线和数据采集系统的即时成本会对他们的预算造成巨大压力。面对有限的资源，基础设施管理者常常被迫优先考虑紧急的实体维修，而非购买诊断技术。当测量设备的成本占计划总成本的很大一部分时，这种财务负担尤其沉重，使得对于较不重要的结构而言，难以证明投资回报的合理性。

这种经济限制清楚地体现在基础设施需求与可用资金之间日益扩大的差距上。根据美国土木工程师学会预测，到2025年，美国将面临累积3.7兆美元的基础建设投资缺口，预计将持续到2033年。严重的资金短缺迫使各机构几乎将所有资金用于延期的维护和维修工作，几乎没有空间用于实施预测维修系统。因此，在对成本高度敏感的行业，结构健康监测解决方案的采用仍然有限，因为营运商难以将资金分配到必要的纠正措施之外的其他用途。

市场趋势

机器人和无人机辅助巡检系统的部署正在革新资料收集方式，实现关键基础设施的频繁、非接触式评估。这些自主平台显着缩短了结构评估所需的时间，同时降低了危险环境中的人员风险。公共产业和资产所有者正越来越大规模地采用这项技术，逐步摒弃维护庞大的配电和输电资产网络时耗力的人工方式。根据太平洋煤气电力公司（PG&E）2025年4月发布的新闻稿，其无人机系统在2024年完成了超过25万次配电设施的无人机巡检和4.2万次输电设施的巡检任务。这表明，电力产业正在向自动化监控转型，以确保电网的可靠性和资产健康。

同时，数位双胞胎技术在生命週期管理中的应用正在改变营运商分析和利用结构数据的方式。透过建立实体资产的动态虚拟副本，工程师可以模拟效能情境并主动预测故障，从而从简单的状态监控发展到全面的资产管理。这种转变得益于整合感测器数据以提供即时可见性和决策支援的软体平台的日益普及。根据 Bentley Systems 于 2025 年 2 月发布的 2024 年全年收益报告，该公司 2024 年的订阅营收成长了 13.2%。这项成长主要得益于基础设施数位双胞胎平台 iTwin 的广泛应用，也印证了市场正向软体定义的资产管理解决方案转型。

目录

第一章概述

第二章：调查方法

第三章执行摘要

第四章：客户心声

第五章：全球结构健康监测市场展望

  • 市场规模及预测
    • 按金额
  • 市占率及预测
    • 依交付方式（硬体、软体、服务）
    • 依技术（有线、无线）
    • 依应用领域（民用基础设施、航太与国防、能源、采矿）
    • 按地区
    • 按公司（2025 年）
  • 市场地图

第六章：北美结构健康监测市场展望

  • 市场规模及预测
  • 市占率及预测
  • 北美洲：国别分析
    • 我们
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥

第七章：欧洲结构健康监测市场展望

  • 市场规模及预测
  • 市占率及预测
  • 欧洲：国别分析
    • 德国
    • 法国
    • 英国
    • 义大利
    • 西班牙

第八章：亚太地区结构健康监测市场展望

  • 市场规模及预测
  • 市占率及预测
  • 亚太地区：国别分析
    • 中国
    • 印度
    • 日本
    • 韩国
    • 澳洲

第九章：中东和非洲结构健康监测市场展望

  • 市场规模及预测
  • 市占率及预测
  • 中东与非洲：国别分析
    • 沙乌地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公国
    • 南非

第十章：南美洲结构健康监测市场展望

  • 市场规模及预测
  • 市占率及预测
  • 南美洲：国别分析
    • 巴西
    • 哥伦比亚
    • 阿根廷

第十一章 市场动态

  • 促进因素
  • 任务

第十二章 市场趋势与发展

  • 併购
  • 产品发布
  • 近期趋势

第十三章：全球结构健康监测市场：SWOT分析

第十四章：波特五力分析

  • 产业竞争
  • 新进入者的潜力
  • 供应商的议价能力
  • 顾客权力
  • 替代品的威胁

第十五章 竞争格局

  • Campbell Scientific, Inc.
  • COWI A/S
  • SGS SA
  • Acellent Technologies, Inc.
  • Kinemetrics Inc.
  • Digitexx Data Systems, Inc.
  • RST Instruments Ltd.
  • James Fisher and Sons plc

第十六章 策略建议

第十七章：关于研究公司及免责声明

简介目录
Product Code: 23492

The Global Structural Health Monitoring Market is projected to experience robust growth, expanding from USD 3.57 Billion in 2025 to USD 6.61 Billion by 2031 at a compound annual growth rate of 10.81%. This field involves utilizing sensor integration and data transmission systems to constantly supervise the physical condition of civil and mechanical infrastructure. The market is primarily driven by the urgent need to prolong the operational life of aging assets and the implementation of stricter government safety regulations. Furthermore, the degrading state of critical structures necessitates immediate predictive maintenance strategies; for instance, the American Road & Transportation Builders Association reported in 2024 that 36% of all bridges in the United States required either significant repairs or complete replacement, highlighting the essential role of monitoring technologies in prioritizing rehabilitation efforts.

Market Overview
Forecast Period2027-2031
Market Size 2025USD 3.57 Billion
Market Size 2031USD 6.61 Billion
CAGR 2026-203110.81%
Fastest Growing SegmentSoftware
Largest MarketNorth America

Despite these favorable growth drivers, the market encounters a major obstacle in the form of high initial capital investments necessary for installing and calibrating complex monitoring equipment. This financial hurdle is particularly severe for extensive infrastructure networks, where the cost of instrumentation often competes directly with limited budgets allocated for actual structural repairs. Consequently, these substantial upfront expenses, coupled with the technical intricacies of processing massive amounts of sensor data, can retard widespread implementation across cost-sensitive industrial sectors.

Market Driver

The growth of renewable energy infrastructure acts as a primary catalyst for the adoption of structural health monitoring technologies. As nations shift towards sustainable power, the deployment of wind energy assets, particularly in offshore environments, requires rigorous continuous surveillance to identify material fatigue and structural irregularities caused by harsh operating conditions. This operational necessity drives the integration of sensors to minimize downtime and optimize energy production. According to the Global Wind Energy Council's 'Global Wind Report 2024' published in April 2024, the wind industry installed a record 117 gigawatts of new capacity globally in 2023, creating a parallel demand for monitoring systems capable of ensuring the long-term reliability of turbine foundations and blades.

Additionally, government funding allocations and public-private partnership infrastructure investments are accelerating market penetration by overcoming financial barriers. Significant capital injections into transportation networks allow operators to procure advanced diagnostic tools that ensure public safety and regulatory compliance. For example, the U.S. Department of Transportation announced in a July 2024 press release that the Biden-Harris Administration awarded over $5 billion to fund large bridge reconstruction and rehabilitation projects, directly supporting the deployment of monitoring solutions in critical transit corridors. Furthermore, Union Pacific planned a capital investment of $3.4 billion in 2024 to upgrade and maintain its network infrastructure, highlighting the extensive financial commitment directed toward asset integrity management.

Market Challenge

The high initial capital investment required for installing and calibrating monitoring equipment constitutes a substantial barrier to the expansion of the Global Structural Health Monitoring Market. Asset owners frequently operate under restricted financial conditions where the immediate costs of hardware, cabling, and data acquisition systems create significant budgetary pressure. When faced with finite resources, infrastructure managers must often prioritize urgent physical repairs over the procurement of diagnostic technologies. This financial strain is particularly severe when the expense of instrumentation represents a large percentage of the total project value, making it difficult to justify the return on investment for non-critical structures.

This economic constraint is clearly visible in the widening disparity between infrastructure needs and available capital. According to the American Society of Civil Engineers, in 2025, the United States faces a cumulative infrastructure investment gap of $3.7 trillion that will persist through 2033. This profound funding deficit forces agencies to divert capital almost exclusively toward deferred maintenance and rehabilitation, leaving minimal room for the adoption of predictive monitoring systems. Consequently, the deployment of structural health monitoring solutions remains limited in cost-sensitive sectors as operators struggle to allocate funds beyond essential corrective measures.

Market Trends

The deployment of robotic and drone-assisted inspection systems is revolutionizing data acquisition by enabling frequent, non-contact assessments of critical infrastructure. These autonomous platforms mitigate human risk in hazardous environments while drastically reducing the time required for structural evaluations. Utilities and asset owners are increasingly operationalizing this technology at scale to maintain vast networks of distribution and transmission assets, shifting away from manual, labor-intensive methods. According to PG&E Corporation's April 2025 press release regarding their aerial system drone fleet, the company conducted over 250,000 drone inspections of distribution structures and 42,000 missions on transmission equipment in 2024, highlighting the sector's pivot toward automated surveillance to ensure grid reliability and asset integrity.

Simultaneously, the implementation of digital twin technology for lifecycle management is transforming how operators analyze and utilize structural data. By creating dynamic virtual replicas of physical assets, engineers can simulate performance scenarios and predict failures before they occur, moving beyond simple condition monitoring to comprehensive asset stewardship. This shift is supported by the growing consumption of software platforms that integrate sensor data for real-time visualization and decision support. According to Bentley Systems' February 2025 report on their full-year 2024 results, the company saw subscription revenues rise 13.2% in 2024, a growth trajectory driven by the increasing adoption of its iTwin Platform for infrastructure digital twins, underscoring the market's transition toward software-defined asset management solutions.

Key Market Players

  • Campbell Scientific, Inc.
  • COWI A/S
  • SGS S.A.
  • Acellent Technologies, Inc.
  • Kinemetrics Inc.
  • Digitexx Data Systems, Inc.
  • RST Instruments Ltd.
  • James Fisher and Sons plc

Report Scope

In this report, the Global Structural Health Monitoring Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Structural Health Monitoring Market, By Offering

  • Hardware
  • Software & Services

Structural Health Monitoring Market, By Technology

  • Wired
  • Wireless

Structural Health Monitoring Market, By End Use

  • Civil Infrastructure
  • Aerospace & Defense
  • Energy
  • Mining

Structural Health Monitoring Market, By Region

  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • France
    • United Kingdom
    • Italy
    • Germany
    • Spain
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Australia
    • South Korea
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Colombia
  • Middle East & Africa
    • South Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Structural Health Monitoring Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Structural Health Monitoring Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

  • 1.1. Market Definition
  • 1.2. Scope of the Market
    • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
    • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
    • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Objective of the Study
  • 2.2. Baseline Methodology
  • 2.3. Key Industry Partners
  • 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
  • 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
  • 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
  • 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Overview of the Market
  • 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
  • 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
  • 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
  • 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook

  • 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 5.1.1. By Value
  • 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 5.2.1. By Offering (Hardware, Software & Services)
    • 5.2.2. By Technology (Wired, Wireless)
    • 5.2.3. By End Use (Civil Infrastructure, Aerospace & Defense, Energy, Mining)
    • 5.2.4. By Region
    • 5.2.5. By Company (2025)
  • 5.3. Market Map

6. North America Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook

  • 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 6.1.1. By Value
  • 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 6.2.1. By Offering
    • 6.2.2. By Technology
    • 6.2.3. By End Use
    • 6.2.4. By Country
  • 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
    • 6.3.1. United States Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook
      • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.1.2.1. By Offering
        • 6.3.1.2.2. By Technology
        • 6.3.1.2.3. By End Use
    • 6.3.2. Canada Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook
      • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.2.2.1. By Offering
        • 6.3.2.2.2. By Technology
        • 6.3.2.2.3. By End Use
    • 6.3.3. Mexico Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook
      • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.3.2.1. By Offering
        • 6.3.3.2.2. By Technology
        • 6.3.3.2.3. By End Use

7. Europe Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook

  • 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 7.1.1. By Value
  • 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 7.2.1. By Offering
    • 7.2.2. By Technology
    • 7.2.3. By End Use
    • 7.2.4. By Country
  • 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
    • 7.3.1. Germany Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook
      • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.1.2.1. By Offering
        • 7.3.1.2.2. By Technology
        • 7.3.1.2.3. By End Use
    • 7.3.2. France Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook
      • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.2.2.1. By Offering
        • 7.3.2.2.2. By Technology
        • 7.3.2.2.3. By End Use
    • 7.3.3. United Kingdom Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook
      • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.3.2.1. By Offering
        • 7.3.3.2.2. By Technology
        • 7.3.3.2.3. By End Use
    • 7.3.4. Italy Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook
      • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.4.2.1. By Offering
        • 7.3.4.2.2. By Technology
        • 7.3.4.2.3. By End Use
    • 7.3.5. Spain Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook
      • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.5.2.1. By Offering
        • 7.3.5.2.2. By Technology
        • 7.3.5.2.3. By End Use

8. Asia Pacific Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook

  • 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 8.1.1. By Value
  • 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 8.2.1. By Offering
    • 8.2.2. By Technology
    • 8.2.3. By End Use
    • 8.2.4. By Country
  • 8.3. Asia Pacific: Country Analysis
    • 8.3.1. China Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook
      • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.1.2.1. By Offering
        • 8.3.1.2.2. By Technology
        • 8.3.1.2.3. By End Use
    • 8.3.2. India Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook
      • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.2.2.1. By Offering
        • 8.3.2.2.2. By Technology
        • 8.3.2.2.3. By End Use
    • 8.3.3. Japan Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook
      • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.3.2.1. By Offering
        • 8.3.3.2.2. By Technology
        • 8.3.3.2.3. By End Use
    • 8.3.4. South Korea Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook
      • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.4.2.1. By Offering
        • 8.3.4.2.2. By Technology
        • 8.3.4.2.3. By End Use
    • 8.3.5. Australia Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook
      • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.5.2.1. By Offering
        • 8.3.5.2.2. By Technology
        • 8.3.5.2.3. By End Use

9. Middle East & Africa Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook

  • 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 9.1.1. By Value
  • 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 9.2.1. By Offering
    • 9.2.2. By Technology
    • 9.2.3. By End Use
    • 9.2.4. By Country
  • 9.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
    • 9.3.1. Saudi Arabia Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook
      • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.1.2.1. By Offering
        • 9.3.1.2.2. By Technology
        • 9.3.1.2.3. By End Use
    • 9.3.2. UAE Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook
      • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.2.2.1. By Offering
        • 9.3.2.2.2. By Technology
        • 9.3.2.2.3. By End Use
    • 9.3.3. South Africa Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook
      • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.3.2.1. By Offering
        • 9.3.3.2.2. By Technology
        • 9.3.3.2.3. By End Use

10. South America Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook

  • 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 10.1.1. By Value
  • 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 10.2.1. By Offering
    • 10.2.2. By Technology
    • 10.2.3. By End Use
    • 10.2.4. By Country
  • 10.3. South America: Country Analysis
    • 10.3.1. Brazil Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook
      • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.1.2.1. By Offering
        • 10.3.1.2.2. By Technology
        • 10.3.1.2.3. By End Use
    • 10.3.2. Colombia Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook
      • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.2.2.1. By Offering
        • 10.3.2.2.2. By Technology
        • 10.3.2.2.3. By End Use
    • 10.3.3. Argentina Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook
      • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.3.2.1. By Offering
        • 10.3.3.2.2. By Technology
        • 10.3.3.2.3. By End Use

11. Market Dynamics

  • 11.1. Drivers
  • 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends & Developments

  • 12.1. Merger & Acquisition (If Any)
  • 12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
  • 12.3. Recent Developments

13. Global Structural Health Monitoring Market: SWOT Analysis

14. Porter's Five Forces Analysis

  • 14.1. Competition in the Industry
  • 14.2. Potential of New Entrants
  • 14.3. Power of Suppliers
  • 14.4. Power of Customers
  • 14.5. Threat of Substitute Products

15. Competitive Landscape

  • 15.1. Campbell Scientific, Inc.
    • 15.1.1. Business Overview
    • 15.1.2. Products & Services
    • 15.1.3. Recent Developments
    • 15.1.4. Key Personnel
    • 15.1.5. SWOT Analysis
  • 15.2. COWI A/S
  • 15.3. SGS S.A.
  • 15.4. Acellent Technologies, Inc.
  • 15.5. Kinemetrics Inc.
  • 15.6. Digitexx Data Systems, Inc.
  • 15.7. RST Instruments Ltd.
  • 15.8. James Fisher and Sons plc

16. Strategic Recommendations

17. About Us & Disclaimer