![]() |
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1927574
基于模型的系统工程 (MBSE) 解决方案与软体/系统建模工具:针对人工智慧时代的抽象与架构MBSE Solutions & Software/System Modeling Tools: Abstraction & Architecture for the AI Era |
||||||
当今嵌入式、边缘和人工智慧系统的高度复杂性要求我们重新专注于工程最佳实践。企业必须找到推动创新并成功管理变革的方法。基于模型的系统工程 (MBSE) 是一种核心方法论和工具。 MBSE 是一套成熟的实践和技术,并且不断发展以满足下一代设计需求。
本报告分析了基于标准语言的建模 (SLBM) 工具(例如 SysML/SysML v2、Modelica 等)和基于专有语言的建模 (PLBM) 工具(例如 SCADE、Simulink)的市场趋势和新兴趋势。本报告还深入探讨了影响 MBSE 解决方案和软体/系统建模工具市场的新兴趋势和技术、标准和法规、工程趋势以及竞争策略。
人工智慧正在重新定义工程组织的需求和机会。软体和系统建模工具的使用者已成为人工智慧的早期采用者,其应用场景多种多样,从将人工智慧工作负载整合到终端设备和系统中,到在自身的工作流程中利用人工智慧。虽然许多供应商正在透过嵌入式人工智慧增强应用生命週期管理 (ALM) 工具,但在人工智慧系统开发领域,建模和基于模型的系统工程 (MBSE) 尤其适用于以下两个明确的应用情境。首先,SysML 工具非常适合用来帮助工程组织设计先进的系统架构,并为安全关键型专案的文件和可追溯性奠定基础。基于专有语言的工具,例如 MATLAB/Simulink 和 SCADE,支援对需要复杂演算法和对复杂环境及运行因素做出即时回应的系统进行设计、开发和模拟。我们相信,系统复杂性的不断增加、安全关键功能需求的日益严格以及企业对效率的需求,将在未来几年内推动对高级建模工具和基于模型的系统工程 (MBSE) 原则的需求。
The complexity of today's embedded, edge, and AI systems demands new attention to engineering best practices. Organizations must identify the approaches required to drive innovation and manage change. Chief among those methods and tools is MBSE, a proven set of practices and technologies evolving to meet the needs of next-generation design requirements.
This report analyzes the market and emerging trends for standard language-based modeling (SLBM) tools (e.g., SysML/SysML v2, Modelica, etc.), as well as proprietary language-based modeling (PLBM) tools (e.g., SCADE, Simulink). It includes detailed discussion of emerging trends and technologies, standards and regulations, engineering behaviors, and competitive strategies that are impacting the market for MBSE solutions and software/system modeling tools.
This research program is written for those making critical business decisions regarding product, market, channel, and competitive strategy and tactics. This report is intended for senior decision-makers who are developing embedded technology, including:
VDC launches numerous surveys of the IoT and embedded engineering ecosystem every year using an online survey platform. To support this research, VDC leverages its in-house panel of more than 30,000 individuals from various roles and industries across the world. Our global Voice of the Engineer survey recently captured insights from a total of 600 qualified respondents. This survey was used to inform our insight into key trends, preferences, and predictions within the engineering community.
The overall market for MBSE and software/system modeling tools reached $B in 2024 and will reach $B in 2029, a CAGR of % over the forecast period, driven by strong growth within the embedded solution market. We believe this growth could accelerate even further in the coming years, as a function of both organic market need as well as further evangelism by the growing roster of PLM, EDA, and ALM companies all working to integrate more MBSE and SysML v2 solutions across their portfolios.
AI is redefining the needs of and opportunities for engineering organizations. Already, software and system modeling tool users are early adopters of AI across a range of use cases from end devices/systems integrating AI workloads to using AI within their own workflows. While many vendors are enhancing their ALM tools with AI-infused intelligence, there are two distinct use cases for AI system development for which modeling and MBSE are well suited. For one, SysML tools are ideal to help engineering organizations architect advanced systems and establish an underpinning for documentation and traceability for safety-critical projects. Proprietary language-based tools, such as MATLAB/Simulink and SCADE, can help organizations design, develop, and simulate systems with advanced algorithms and needs for real-time response to complex environmental, operational factors. We believe that the combination of advancing system complexity, safety-critical functionality requirements, and corporate mandates for efficiency will drive increasing need for sophisticated modeling tools and MBSE principles for years to come.
Code generation has been a key area of extension and value add for modeling tool vendors for over a decade. In practice, however, legacy solutions fell short due to shortcomings of architectural abstractions and the realities of fragmented hardware ecosystems. Despite generative AI coding capabilities only recently becoming widely commercially available, users of modeling tools have eagerly adopted these solutions at a disproportionately high rate, with % using the technology - a rate twice that of the industry overall.
Developers across both enterprise and embedded domains report significant reservations regarding the trustworthiness of AI-generated code. Across organization types, engineers identified code quality, security, compliance, and license infringement as leading concerns. Embedded engineers cited code quality as the absolute highest concern due to the importance of software performance in embedded system function. Software must run exactly as intended, regardless of deployment environment. Tool providers should restrict model training databases to ensure that AI generates reliable code based on tested documentation and examples, which will also help end users reduce licensing risks. In tandem, solution providers should offer model training and refinement as a service to further ensure a level of specialized code quality that generic LLM-based solutions cannot provide.
To address compliance concerns, modeling tool vendors should partner with requirements management, test, and software composition analysis (SCA) providers. Engineering organizations must effectively manage and trace
requirements to meet standards such as DO-178C and ISO 26262. IBM DOORS, Jama Connect, and Polarion from Siemens all help engineers track compliance from design to code to test. Similarly, SCA tools from vendors such as Black Duck, CodeSecure, Mend, Revenera, Sonatype, and Snyk track violations from known repositories to ensure that open source and AI-generated code do not violate existing licenses. In the same way that application lifecycle management, software testing, and SCA have converged in recent years to form single-platform solutions, AI code generation solutions and extensions fit directly within the software tooling landscape. A fully combined solution featuring modeling, requirements management, code generation, and software verification and validation would give customers a single dashboard or source of truth for code generation analytics, quality, induced risks, and impact on development time.