查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
卫星通讯用平板天线:技术形势
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1799224

卫星通讯用平板天线:技术形势

Satcom Flat-Panel Antennas: Technology Landscape
出版日期: | 出版商: Analysys Mason | 英文 14 Slides | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格
简介目录

"没有哪一项技术可以主导卫星通讯平板天线市场。"

本报告为卫星通讯 (satcom) 平板天线 (FPA) 技术格局提供了一个框架。

低地球轨道 (LEO) 星座和高速移动服务需要能够动态波束控制的薄阵列来满足客户需求。在 FPA 类别中，供应商正在开发几种不同类型的技术，每种技术的成本、效能以及对特定用例的适用性各不相同。

本报告分析了目前已在用或正在开发的五种最主要的卫星通讯 FPA 技术。报告对这些技术进行了定义和比较，并确定了性能和设计权衡。

五个属性被视为一个比较框架。针对每个属性，报告提供了基准测试能力，卫星通讯设备供应商和服务提供者可以以此为基础比较解决方案并确定最适合其需求的目标参数。

本报告探讨的问题

  • 卫星通讯FPA主要采用哪些技术？如何对它们进行分类？
  • 比较FPA技术时需要考虑的面向。
  • 各种FPA技术之间如何比较？它们各自的优缺点是什么？
  • 可用于有效比较卫星通讯FPA技术的指标，即使跨平台尺寸和频率也是如此。
  • 每个属性的低/中/高效能基准。
简介目录

"No single technology for satellite communication flat-panel antennas dominates."

This report provides a framework for the satellite communication (satcom) flat-panel antenna (FPA) technology landscape.

FPAs are a crucial enabler of high-growth satcom use cases; low-Earth orbit (LEO) constellations and high-speed mobility services need low-profile arrays with dynamic beam steering to meet customers' needs. Within the FPA category, there are several distinct technology types that vendors are developing, which vary in their cost, performance and suitability for specific use cases.

In this report, we analyse the five most prominent technologies that are either already in use, or are being developed, for satcom FPAs. We define and compare these technologies to identify the performance and design trade-offs.

We consider five attributes to frame our comparisons. For each attribute, we include benchmark capabilities that satcom equipment vendors and service providers can use as a base for comparing solutions and identifying optimal target parameters for their needs.

Questions answered in this report:

  • What are the main technologies used for satcom FPAs, and how can these be categorised?
  • Which areas should be considered when comparing FPA technologies?
  • How do FPA technologies compare with each other, and what are the strengths and weaknesses of each?
  • Which metrics can be used to make effective comparisons between satcom FPA technologies, even across different platform sizes or frequencies?
  • What are the benchmarks for low/moderate/high performance for each attribute?