查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1304533

全球浮式生产储油卸油船（FPSO）市场 - 2023-2030

Global Floating Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO) Market - 2023-2030
出版日期: | 出版商: DataM Intelligence | 英文 215 Pages | 商品交期: 约2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

简介目录

市场概述

全球浮式生产储油卸油船（FPSO）市场规模在2022年达到142亿美元，预计到2030年将达到235亿美元，2023-2030年的年复合增长率为6.5%。

当前的地缘政治局势非常有利于全球FPSO市场的增长。随着中东传统出口国的供应被亚洲国家买断，欧洲国家正依靠南美和非洲新兴出口国填补其能源进口缺口。非洲不断扩大的海上油气生产将在中长期内创造对FPSO的新需求。

海洋工程公司正在开发新的设计，以提高FPSO的能源效率和整体性能。例如，2023年5月，马来西亚海洋工程公司MISC推出了一种新型FPSO设计，该设计采用超大型模块上部结构，提高了系统集成能力，并允许采用可持续技术。

市场动态

全球液化天然气需求增长

与煤炭和石油相比，液化天然气被认为是一种燃烧更清洁的燃料，因此温室气体排放量更低。包括LNG在内的天然气通常被认为是迈向低碳未来的过渡燃料。此外，由于俄乌战争导致俄罗斯天然气供应中断，欧洲国家越来越多地转向液化天然气（LNG）以满足其能源需求。

对液化天然气需求的上升导致海上气田勘探和开发的增加。其中许多气田位于偏远和具有挑战性的海上环境，传统的固定平台并不可行。FPSO为这些海上气田的LNG生产、储存和卸载提供了灵活、经济的解决方案。

FPSO可以在船上采用先进的天然气处理和液化技术。这些技术可将天然气转化为液化天然气，使其更易于运输和储存，成本效益更高。在FPSO上集成天然气处理和液化功能可简化整个生产流程，支持全球液化天然气市场的增长。

海上平台退役

当海上平台的生产寿命结束时，必须进行退役。与其完全放弃油田，不如部署FPSO来开采剩余储量，延长油田的生产寿命。FPSO能够继续生产、储存和卸载碳氢化合物，最大限度地提高海上资产的价值，减少完全拆除平台的需要。

FPSO为固定海上平台的退役提供了具有成本效益的替代方案。拆除海上平台既昂贵又复杂，涉及重型起重和拆卸作业。通过在油田部署FPSO，运营商可以避免昂贵的平台拆除和处置过程。相反，他们可以利用现有的基础设施和设备继续生产。

高资本成本

开发和部署FPSO涉及大量的前期资本投资。与FPSO的工程设计、建造、安装和调试相关的成本可能相当可观。后疫情时期新建浮式生产储油装置的成本尤其高昂。例如，2021年6月，巴西国有能源公司Petrobras从韩国DSME造船公司订购了一艘新的FPSO P-79，价格为23亿美元。

FPSO项目的巨额资本支出影响了投资回报率和盈利能力。收回初始投资所需的投资回收期较长，再加上全球油价和项目业绩的不确定性，会使其对融资方的吸引力降低。这可能导致运营商采取谨慎态度，并影响全球FPSO市场的增长。

COVID-19影响分析

大流行病对包括油气行业在内的全球经济造成了破坏。因此，许多运营商推迟了投资决策，推迟或取消了计划中的FPSO项目。大流行病持续时间和严重程度的不确定性，加上油价波动，导致该行业资本支出减少。

大流行病导致全球供应链中断。国际旅行限制、封锁措施和生产设施的临时关闭影响了FPSO项目所需的关键部件和设备的供应和交付。尽管大流行病造成了短期挑战，但FPSO市场的长期前景依然乐观。

乌克兰-俄罗斯战争影响

俄乌冲突导致欧盟和美国对俄罗斯实施严厉的经济制裁。制裁导致西方对俄罗斯的技术转让完全受阻。制裁使俄罗斯无法获得先进的海上浮式生产储油装置，以勘探北极地区的近海石油和天然气储量。

在欧洲，能源供应从俄罗斯彻底转向美国和中东。该地区的许多国家开始在国际市场上购买大量液化天然气（LNG），以填补俄罗斯能源供应中断留下的缺口。这就产生了对FPSO的临时需求，以确保在陆上建造长期储存设施的同时安全储存液化天然气。

目录

第一章 研究方法和范围

  • 研究方法
  • 研究目的和报告范围

第2章：定义和概述

第3章：执行摘要

  • 按类型摘录
  • 按载体类型划分
  • 按水深划分
  • 按船体类型划分
  • 按区域划分

第四章：动态

  • 影响因素
    • 驱动因素
      • 石油和天然气需求增长
      • 海上天然气加工和液化的增加
      • 全球液化天然气需求增长
      • 海上平台退役
    • 限制因素
      • 资本成本高
      • 来自其他生产系统的竞争
    • 机会
    • 影响分析

第五章 行业分析

  • 波特五力分析法
  • 供应链分析
  • 定价分析
  • 法规分析

第六章：COVID-19分析

  • COVID-19分析
    • COVID之前的情景
    • COVID期间的情景
    • COVID之后的情景
  • COVID-19 期间的定价动态
  • 供求关系
  • 大流行期间与市场相关的政府倡议
  • 制造商的战略倡议
  • 结论

第七章：按类型

  • 石油
  • 液化石油气
  • 液化天然气
  • 其他类型

第八章：按船型分类

  • 改装船舶
  • 新建船舶
  • 重新部署

第九章：按水深分类

  • 浅水区
  • 深水和超深水

第10章：按船体类型

  • 单船体
  • 双壳

第十一章：按地区

  • 北美洲
    • 美国
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 欧洲
    • 德国
    • 英国
    • 法国
    • 法国
    • 西班牙
    • 欧洲其他地区
  • 南美洲
    • 巴西
    • 阿根廷
    • 南美其他地区
  • 亚太地区
    • 中国
    • 印度
    • 日本
    • 澳大利亚
    • 亚太其他地区
  • 中东和非洲

第十二章 ：竞争格局

  • 竞争格局
  • 市场定位/份额分析
  • 合併与收购分析

第十三章 ：公司简介

  • BP Plc
    • 公司概况
    • 类型组合和描述
    • 财务概况
    • 近期发展
  • Aker Solutions AS
  • Shell Global
  • Bluewater Energy Services B.V.
  • Bumi Armada Berhad
  • BW Offshore
  • Chevron
  • ExxonMobil Corporation
  • MODEC, Inc.
  • Petrobras

第十四章：附录

简介目录
Product Code: EP5310

Market Overview

The Global Floating Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO) Market reached US$ 14.2 billion in 2022 and is expected to reach US$ 23.5 billion by 2030, growing with a CAGR of 6.5% during the forecast period 2023-2030.

The current geopolitical situation has been highly conducive to the growth of the global FPSO market. With supplies from traditional exporters in the Middle East being bought up by Asian countries, European countries are relying upon newly emerging exporters in South America and Africa to fill gaps in its energy imports. Expanding offshore oil and gas production in Africa will create new demand for FPSOs in the medium and long-term.

Marine engineering companies are developing new designs to improve the energy efficiency and overall performance of FPSOs. For instance, in May 2023, MISC, a Malaysian marine engineering company unveiled a new FPSO design that utilizes mega-module topsides , improving systems integration and allowing for sustainable technologies.

Market Dynamics

Growing Global LNG Demand

LNG is considered a cleaner-burning fuel than coal and oil, resulting in lower greenhouse gas emissions. Natural gas, including LNG, is often considered a transitional fuel towards a low-carbon future. Furthermore, with the disruption in Russian natural gas supplies due to the Russia-Ukraine war, European countries are increasingly turning to liquified natural gas (LNG) to fulfill their energy demand.

The rising demand for LNG has led to increased exploration and development of offshore gas fields. Many of these fields are located in remote and challenging offshore environments where traditional fixed platforms are not feasible. FPSOs offer a flexible and cost-effective solution for LNG production, storage, and offloading in these offshore gas fields.

FPSOs can incorporate advanced technologies for gas processing and liquefaction on board. The technologies enable the conversion of natural gas into LNG, making it easier and more cost-effective to transport and store. The integration of gas processing and liquefaction capabilities on FPSOs streamlines the overall production process and supports the growth of the global LNG market.

Decommissioning of Offshore Platforms

Decommissioning becomes necessary as offshore platforms reach the end of their production life. Instead of altogether abandoning the field, FPSOs can be deployed to extract remaining reserves and extend the field's productive life. FPSOs enable continued production, storage, and offloading of hydrocarbons, maximizing the value of offshore assets and reducing the need for full platform removal.

FPSOs offer a cost-effective alternative to decommissioning fixed offshore platforms. Removing offshore platforms can be expensive and complex, involving heavy lifting and dismantling operations. By deploying an FPSO to the field, operators can avoid the costly platform removal and disposal process. Instead, they can continue production while using the existing infrastructure and facilities.

High Capital Costs

Developing and deploying an FPSO involves substantial upfront capital investment. The costs associated with engineering, construction, installation, and commissioning of FPSOs can be considerable. New FPSOs in the post-pandemic period have become especially expensive. For instance, in June 2021, Petrobras, Brazil's state-owned energy company, ordered a new FPSO P-79 from South Korea's DSME shipbuilding company for US$ 2.3 billion.

The significant capital outlay for FPSO projects affects the return on investment and profitability. The long payback period required to recoup the initial investment, coupled with uncertainties in global oil prices and project performance, can make it a less attractive proposition for financers. It can lead to a cautious approach from operators and impact the growth of the global FPSO market.

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

The pandemic caused disruptions across the global economy, including the oil and gas industry. As a result, many operators postponed their investment decisions and delayed or canceled planned FPSO projects. Uncertainty regarding the duration and severity of the pandemic, coupled with volatile oil prices, led to reduced capital expenditure in the industry.

The pandemic resulted in disruptions to global supply chains. Restrictions on international travel, lockdown measures, and temporary shutdowns of manufacturing facilities affected the availability and delivery of critical components and equipment necessary for FPSO projects. Despite the short-term challenges caused by the pandemic, the long-term outlook for the FPSO market remains positive.

Ukraine-Russia War Impact

The Russia-Ukraine conflict led to European Union (EU) and the U.S. imposing stringent economic sanctions on Russia. The sanctions caused the complete blockage of Western technology transfer to Russia. The sanctions deprived Russia of access to advanced FPSOs for the exploration of offshore oil and gas reserves in the Arctic.

A radical reorientation of energy supplies from Russia to the U.S. and the Middle East occurred in Europe. Many countries in the region started buying large cargoes of liquified natural gas (LNG) on the international markets to fill the gap left by the disruption of Russian energy supplies. It created a temporary demand for FPSOs to ensure secure LNG storage while long-term storage facilities were built onshore.

Segment Analysis

The Global FPSO Market is segmented based on type, carrier type, water depth, hull type and region.

Double-Hulled Ships are the Most Widely Used for FPSO

The primary advantage of double-hulled ships is their improved safety and environmental protection features. The double hull design provides an extra layer of protection, reducing the risk of oil spills in the event of a collision or grounding. The outer hull acts as a protective barrier, minimizing the chances of oil leakage and offering increased resistance to damage.

Double-hulled tankers meet or exceed stringent regulatory requirements set by international maritime organizations and environmental agencies. Regulations such as the International Maritime Organization's (IMO) MARPOL Convention mandate the phase-out of single-hulled tankers and the use of double-hulled vessels to prevent oil pollution. By using double-hulled ships, FPSOs can comply with these regulations and ensure higher environmental protection.

FPSOs are long-term investments, with operational lifetimes spanning 15-20 years. Double-hulled ships are generally more durable and have longer service lives than single-hulled vessels. The added protection provided by the double hull design helps extend the life of the FPSO, reducing the risks of structural fatigue, corrosion and potential failures associated with aging single-hulled tankers.

Geographical Analysis

Commercial Production from New Reserves Will Propel Demand from South America

New commercial offshore reserves have been discovered in South America, mainly off the coast of Guyana and Brazil. The discovery of retail oil and gas deposits has increased demand for FPSOs as companies scramble to exploit these reserves. Traditional South American producers such as Venezuela are increasing their capacity. For instance, in January 2023, a Trinidad and Tobago company was awarded a license to develop a new offshore gas field in Venezuela.

In May 2023, SBM Offshore, a Dutch oilfield services company, signed a long-term maintenance contract with the multinational energy company Exxon Mobil Corporation for the company's FPSO fleet servicing the Starboek offshore block near Guyana. In December 2022, Petrobras, the Brazilian state-owned oil and gas company, announced that it had begun the tendering process to obtain two new FPSOs for operation in the Atapu and Sepia deepwater oil fields.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players include: BP Plc, Aker Solutions AS, Shell Global, Bluewater Energy Services B.V., Bumi Armada Berhad, BW Offshore, Chevron, ExxonMobil Corporation, MODEC, Inc. and Petrobras.

Why Purchase the Report?

  • To visualize the Global FPSO Market segmentation based on type, carrier type, water depth, hull type and region, and understand critical commercial assets and players.
  • Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
  • Excel data sheet with numerous diamond art painting market-level data points with all segments.
  • PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
  • Product mapping available as Excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The Global FPSO Market Report Would Provide Approximately 64 Tables, 66 Figures And 215 Pages.

Target Audience 2023

  • Oil and Gas Companies
  • Energy Trading Companies
  • Marine Engineering Companies
  • Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
  • Research Professionals

Table of Contents

1. Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1. Research Methodology
  • 1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Snippet by Type
  • 3.2. Snippet by Carrier Type
  • 3.3. Snippet by Water Depth
  • 3.4. Snippet by Hull Type
  • 3.5. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

  • 4.1. Impacting Factors
    • 4.1.1. Drivers
      • 4.1.1.1. Rising Demand for Oil and Gas
      • 4.1.1.2. Increase in Offshore Gas Processing and Liquefaction
      • 4.1.1.3. Growing Global LNG Demand
      • 4.1.1.4. Decommissioning of Offshore Platforms
    • 4.1.2. Restraints
      • 4.1.2.1. High Capital Costs
      • 4.1.2.2. Competition from Other Production Systems
    • 4.1.3. Opportunity
    • 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

  • 5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
  • 5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
  • 5.3. Pricing Analysis
  • 5.4. Regulatory Analysis

6. COVID-19 Analysis

  • 6.1. Analysis of COVID-19
    • 6.1.1. Scenario Before COVID
    • 6.1.2. Scenario During COVID
    • 6.1.3. Scenario Post COVID
  • 6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
  • 6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
  • 6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
  • 6.5. Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
  • 6.6. Conclusion

7. By Type

  • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Type
  • 7.2. Oil*
    • 7.2.1. Introduction
    • 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 7.3. LPG
  • 7.4. LNG
  • 7.5. Others

8. By Carrier Type

  • 8.1. Introduction
    • 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Carrier Type
    • 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Carrier Type
  • 8.2. Converted Ship*
    • 8.2.1. Introduction
    • 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 8.3. New Built Ship
  • 8.4. Redeployed

9. By Water Depth

  • 9.1. Introduction
    • 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Water Depth
    • 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Water Depth
  • 9.2. Shallow Water*
    • 9.2.1. Introduction
    • 9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 9.3. Deep and Ultra-deep Water

10. By Hull Type

  • 10.1. Introduction
    • 10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Hull Type
    • 10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Hull Type
  • 10.2. Single Hull*
    • 10.2.1. Introduction
    • 10.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 10.3. Double Hull

11. By Region

  • 11.1. Introduction
    • 11.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
    • 11.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
  • 11.2. North America
    • 11.2.1. Introduction
    • 11.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Carrier Type
    • 11.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Water Depth
    • 11.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Hull Type
    • 11.2.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.2.7.1. The U.S.
      • 11.2.7.2. Canada
      • 11.2.7.3. Mexico
  • 11.3. Europe
    • 11.3.1. Introduction
    • 11.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Carrier Type
    • 11.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Water Depth
    • 11.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Hull Type
    • 11.3.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.3.7.1. Germany
      • 11.3.7.2. The UK
      • 11.3.7.3. France
      • 11.3.7.4. Italy
      • 11.3.7.5. Spain
      • 11.3.7.6. Rest of Europe
  • 11.4. South America
    • 11.4.1. Introduction
    • 11.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Carrier Type
    • 11.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Water Depth
    • 11.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Hull Type
    • 11.4.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.4.7.1. Brazil
      • 11.4.7.2. Argentina
      • 11.4.7.3. Rest of South America
  • 11.5. Asia-Pacific
    • 11.5.1. Introduction
    • 11.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Carrier Type
    • 11.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Water Depth
    • 11.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Hull Type
    • 11.5.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.5.7.1. China
      • 11.5.7.2. India
      • 11.5.7.3. Japan
      • 11.5.7.4. Australia
      • 11.5.7.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 11.6. Middle East and Africa
    • 11.6.1. Introduction
    • 11.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Carrier Type
    • 11.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Water Depth
    • 11.6.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Hull Type

12. Competitive Landscape

  • 12.1. Competitive Scenario
  • 12.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
  • 12.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

13. Company Profiles

  • 13.1. BP Plc*
    • 13.1.1. Company Overview
    • 13.1.2. Type Portfolio and Description
    • 13.1.3. Financial Overview
    • 13.1.4. Recent Developments
  • 13.2. Aker Solutions AS
  • 13.3. Shell Global
  • 13.4. Bluewater Energy Services B.V.
  • 13.5. Bumi Armada Berhad
  • 13.6. BW Offshore
  • 13.7. Chevron
  • 13.8. ExxonMobil Corporation
  • 13.9. MODEC, Inc.
  • 13.10. Petrobras

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

14. Appendix

  • 14.1. About Us and Services
  • 14.2. Contact Us