查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1446804

全球生物杀虫剂市场 - 2023-20230

Global Bionematicides Market - 2023-20230
出版日期: | 出版商: DataM Intelligence | 英文 195 Pages | 商品交期: 约2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

简介目录

概述

全球生物杀虫剂市场在2022年达到2.267亿美元，预计到2030年将达到7.264亿美元，2023-2030年预测期间CAGR为15.6%。

人们非常关注永续发展和减少农业对环境的影响。生物杀线虫剂更环保，作为化学杀线虫剂的永续替代品越来越受到重视。由于需求不断增长，製造商正在开发各种产品并扩大生物杀虫剂市场。 2023年7月，农业公司先正达推出了CERTANO生物解决方案和Cropwise数位技术，以应对甘蔗田的线虫、蛾和疾病。

各国政府和监管机构正在对化学农药的使用实施更严格的规定。生物杀线虫剂毒性较低，对环境的影响也较小，因此作为合规替代品受到青睐。植物寄生线虫正在对化学杀线虫剂产生抗药性。生物杀线虫剂提供了有效管理线虫的宝贵工具，特别是当化学选择变得不太有效时。

土壤处理由于直接针对根部线虫而在生物杀线虫剂市场中占有重要份额。由于北美日益关注永续和生态友善农业，因此在生物杀线虫剂市场中占有重要份额。 2021年9月，Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc.宣布向美国监管机构提交其下一代杀线虫剂/杀虫剂MBI-306。此外，该公司还宣布，提交 MBI-206 已进入最后阶段，MBI-206 是一种广泛使用的生物杀虫剂种子处理剂，已在美国超过 1000 万英亩的土地上应用。

动力学

线虫造成的农作物损失日益严重

线虫导致全球农作物产量严重损失。根据全印度种植系统线虫协调研究计画 (AICRP) 的数据，植物寄生线虫每年造成 21.3% 的农作物损失，金额达卢比。 1020.3979 亿（15.8 亿美元）。线虫以植物根部为食，导致生长发育不良，减少养分吸收，最终降低作物产量。面临线虫侵扰的农民正在积极寻求有效的解决方案来减轻这些损失。

传统的化学杀线虫剂会对环境和健康产生负面影响。向更永续和生态友善的农业实践的转变使生物杀虫剂成为有吸引力的选择。生物杀线剂提供了一种更永续的替代方案，因为它们通常被认为对环境更安全。它们的分解速度更快，对非目标生物体的毒性更低，从而减少了整体环境影响。

对有机食品的需求不断增长

根据FiBL统计，2021年有机零售额攀升40亿欧元，达到近1,250亿欧元。由于担心传统作物上的农药残留，消费者越来越多地寻求有机食品。他们更喜欢不使用合成化学农药种植的产品。因此，对有机食品的需求增加，推动了对生物杀线虫剂等有机害虫防治解决方案的需求。

为了满足有机认证标准，有机农民必须使用经批准的有机害虫防治方法。生物杀线虫剂被认为符合有机农业实践，使其成为希望在保持有机状态的同时控制线虫侵扰的有机农民的自然选择。

作用速度慢，保存期限短

生物杀线虫剂通常由活生物体或天然化合物组成，无法立即控制线虫，而是比合成杀线虫剂需要更长的时间才能发挥作用。这种行动的延迟可能是一个缺点，特别是在线虫族群快速增长威胁作物产量的情况下。农民可能更喜欢效果更快的化学杀线虫剂。

与合成化学杀线虫剂相比，生物杀线虫剂的保存期限通常较短。有限的保质期可能会给製造商、分销商和零售商带来物流挑战。它可能需要特殊的储存条件，并且产品过期的风险可能导致库存浪费。

目录

第 1 章：方法与范围

  • 研究方法论
  • 报告的研究目的和范围

第 2 章：定义与概述

第 3 章：执行摘要

  • 按类型分類的片段
  • 按表格列出的片段
  • 按作物摘录
  • 感染片段
  • 按申请模式分類的片段
  • 按地区分類的片段

第 4 章：动力学

  • 影响因素
    • 司机
      • 线虫造成的农作物损失日益严重
      • 对有机食品的需求不断增长
    • 限制
      • 作用速度慢，保存期限短
    • 机会
    • 影响分析

第 5 章：产业分析

  • 波特五力分析
  • 供应链分析
  • 定价分析
  • 监管分析

第 6 章：COVID-19 分析

  • COVID-19 分析
    • 新冠疫情爆发前的情景
    • 新冠疫情期间的情景
    • 新冠疫情后的情景
  • COVID-19 期间的定价动态
  • 供需谱
  • 疫情期间政府与市场相关的倡议
  • 製造商策略倡议
  • 结论

第 7 章：按类型

  • 微生物
  • 生化品

第 8 章：按形式

  • 干燥
  • 液体

第 9 章：依作物分类

  • 谷物及谷物
  • 油籽和豆类
  • 水果和蔬菜
  • 其他的

第10章：被感染

  • 根结线虫
  • 囊肿线虫
  • 病斑线虫
  • 其他的

第 11 章：依申请方式

  • 种子处理
  • 土壤处理
  • 叶面喷施
  • 其他的

第 12 章：按地区

  • 北美洲
    • 我们
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 欧洲
    • 德国
    • 英国
    • 法国
    • 义大利
    • 俄罗斯
    • 欧洲其他地区
  • 南美洲
    • 巴西
    • 阿根廷
    • 南美洲其他地区
  • 亚太
    • 中国
    • 印度
    • 日本
    • 澳洲
    • 亚太其他地区
  • 中东和非洲

第13章：竞争格局

  • 竞争场景
  • 市场定位/份额分析
  • 併购分析

第 14 章：公司简介

  • FMC Corporation
    • 公司简介
    • 产品组合和描述
    • 财务概览
    • 最近的发展
  • Corteva
  • Agri Life
  • Certis USA LLC
  • Pro Farm Group Inc
  • T.Stanes and Company Limited
  • Valent BioSciences
  • Crop IQ Technology Ltd
  • Biotech International Limited
  • KILPEST INDIA LTD

第 15 章：附录

简介目录
Product Code: AG7972

Overview

Global Bionematicides Market reached US$ 226.7 million in 2022 and is expected to reach US$ 726.4 million by 2030, growing with a CAGR of 15.6% during the forecast period 2023-2030.

There is a strong focus on sustainability and reducing the environmental impact of agriculture. Bionematicides, being more environmentally friendly, are gaining traction as a sustainable alternative to chemical nematicides. Due to this growing demand, manufacturers are developing a wide range of products and expanding the bionemticides market. In July 2023, Syngenta, an agriculture company, introduced CERTANO biological solution and Cropwise digital technology to tackle nematodes, moths, and diseases in sugarcane fields.

Governments and regulatory bodies are imposing stricter regulations on the use of chemical pesticides. Bionematicides, with their lower toxicity and reduced environmental impact, are finding favor as compliant alternatives. Plant-parasitic nematodes are developing resistance to chemical nematicides. Bionematicides provide a valuable tool to manage nematodes effectively, especially when chemical options become less effective.

Soil treatment holds a significant share of the bionematicides market due to its direct targeting of nematodes at the root level. North America held a significant share of the bionematicides market due to its increasing focus on sustainable and eco-friendly agriculture. In September 2021, Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. declared submitting MBI-306, its next-generation nematicide/insecticide, to regulatory authorities in the United States. Additionally, the company declared that it was in the final stages of submitting MBI-206, a widely used bionematicide seed treatment that is applied on over 10 million acres in the United States.

Dynamics

Growing Cropp Loss due to Nematode

Nematodes are responsible for substantial crop yield losses worldwide. According to the All India Coordinated Research Project (AICRP) on Nematodes in Cropping Systems, Plant-parasitic nematodes result in 21.3% of crop losses each year, amounting to Rs. 102,039.79 million (1.58 billion USD). Nematodes feed on plant roots, causing stunted growth, reduced nutrient uptake, and ultimately decreased crop yields. Farmers facing nematode infestations are actively seeking effective solutions to mitigate these losses.

Traditional chemical nematicides can have negative environmental and health impacts. The shift towards more sustainable and eco-friendly agricultural practices has made bionematicides an attractive choice. Bionematicides offer a more sustainable alternative because they are generally considered safer for the environment. They break down more rapidly and have lower toxicity to non-target organisms, reducing the overall environmental impact.

Rising Demand for Organic Food Products

According to FiBL, in 2021, organic retail sales climbed by 4 billion euros and reached nearly 125 billion euros. Consumers are increasingly seeking organic food products due to concerns about pesticide residues on conventional crops. They prefer products that are grown without synthetic chemical pesticides. As a result, the demand for organic food products has risen, driving the need for organic pest control solutions like bionematicides.

To meet organic certification standards, organic farmers must use approved organic pest control methods. Bionematicides are considered compliant with organic farming practices, making them a natural choice for organic farmers looking to manage nematode infestations while maintaining their organic status.

Slow Speed of Action and Short Shelf Life

Bionematicides, which typically consist of living organisms or natural compounds, do not provide immediate control of nematodes, rather it takes longer to act than synthetic nematicides. This delay in action can be a drawback, especially in situations where rapid nematode population growth threatens crop yields. Farmers may prefer chemical nematicides that offer quicker results.

Bionematicides often have shorter shelf lives compared to synthetic chemical nematicides. This limited shelf life can pose logistical challenges for manufacturers, distributors, and retailers. It may require special storage conditions, and the risk of product expiration can lead to wasted inventory.

Segment Analysis

The global bionematicides market is segmented based on type, form, crop, infestation, mode of application and region.

Soil Treatment Held the Highest Share in the Bionematicides Market

Soil treatment as a mode of application in bionematicides promotes numerous agricultural benefits. It enhances seed germination, accelerates plant growth, optimizes moisture and nutrient utilization, and ultimately leads to increased crop yields. This approach significantly contributes to the highest share in the bionematicides market.

Soil treatment allows bionematicides to be applied directly to the root zone where nematodes primarily reside and cause damage. This direct targeting increases the efficacy of bionematicides in controlling nematode populations. In January 2022, Certis Biologicals, a pioneer in the development of biological pesticides, announced the launch of its new bionematicide, MeloCon LC. MeloCon LC enables late-season nematode control by being applied up to 14 days before planting, during the growth season, and at planting.

Geographical Penetration

North America's Growing Focus on Sustainability

North America is increasingly recognizing the significance of sustainable and eco-friendly agricultural practices. In this context, bionematicides have gained prominence as a greener alternative to chemical nematicides, in line with the region's sustainability objectives.

The region has seen substantial investments in research and development related to bionematicides, resulting in the introduction of more effective and reliable products. In August 2023, Indigo Ag, a provider of sustainable agriculture solutions, declared the launch of Biotrinsic Z15, the company's first bionematicide for the U.S. market. Biotrinsic Z15 for soybean and maize is an extension of the business's biological inventions.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players include FMC Corporation, Corteva, Agri Life, Certis USA L.L.C., Pro Farm Group Inc, T.Stanes and Company Limited, Valent BioSciences, Crop IQ Technology Ltd, Biotech International Limited, KILPEST INDIA LTD

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

COVID Impact

The pandemic increased awareness of the importance of sustainable and resilient food systems. This shift in mindset favored the adoption of bionematicides as a more sustainable and environmentally friendly pest control solution. Consumer demand for organic and pesticide-free produce grew during the pandemic. Bionematicides, being compatible with organic farming, gained traction as a means of meeting this demand.

However, the pandemic disrupted supply chains, causing delays in the production and distribution of agricultural inputs, including bionematicides. Lockdowns, travel restrictions, and labor shortages affected the availability of these products. Many farmers faced challenges in accessing markets due to lockdowns and social distancing measures. This limited their ability to purchase and use bionematicides.

Russia- Ukraine War Impact

The conflict disrupted transportation routes and supply chains in the region, and it affected the availability of bionematicides, especially where key production or distribution facilities are located in the affected areas. Geopolitical instability due to the war impacted the economic stability of the countries involved and neighboring regions. This led to fluctuations in currency exchange rates and overall market uncertainty, affecting the cost and availability of agricultural inputs like bionematicides.

Economic sanctions impacted the country's ability to import agricultural products like biopesticides and seeds. The war affected the agricultural activities in the region. As a result, there is a reduced demand for various agricultural inputs including bionematicides in the region which impacted its market growth.

By Type

  • Microbials
  • Biochemicals

By Form

  • Dry
  • Liquid

By Crop

  • Cereals & Grains
  • Oilseeds & Pulses
  • Fruits & Vegetables
  • Others

By Infestation

  • Root-Knot Nematodes
  • Cyst Nematodes
  • Lesion Nematodes
  • Others

By Mode of Application

  • Seed Treatment
  • Soil Treatment
  • Foliar Spray
  • Others

By Region

  • North America
    • U.S.
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • France
    • Italy
    • Russia
    • Rest of Europe
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East and Africa

Key Developments

  • In December 2022, Corteva Agriscience, an American agricultural chemical and seed company, introduced Lumialza, a biological nematicide for seed treatment in Brazil. Lumialza contains a naturally occurring organism, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens bacteria (strain PTA-4838). This organism colonises the root region and forms a biological barrier against a variety of dangerous nematodes.
  • In August 2021, Sumitomo Chemical introduced Aveo in Brazil. It is a novel biological method of treating seeds to combat nematodes.
  • In October 2022, Holganix, a biotechnology company, declared that it had been granted a US patent (US 11,447,427 B2) for a new microbial bionematicide technology.
  • In December 2021, BASF SE, a manufacturer of chemicals, plastics, crop protection products, etc. introduced its first bionematicide under the Votivo Prime trade name.

Why Purchase the Report?

  • To visualize the global bionematicides market segmentation based on type, form, crop, infestation, mode of application and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
  • Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
  • Excel data sheet with numerous data points of Bionematicides market-level with all segments.
  • PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
  • Product mapping available as Excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global bionematicides market report would provide approximately 77 tables, 78 figures and 195 Pages.

Target Audience 2023

  • Manufacturers/ Buyers
  • Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
  • Research Professionals
  • Emerging Companies

Table of Contents

1. Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1. Research Methodology
  • 1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Snippet by Type
  • 3.2. Snippet by Form
  • 3.3. Snippet by Crop
  • 3.4. Snippet by Infestation
  • 3.5. Snippet by Mode of Application
  • 3.6. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

  • 4.1. Impacting Factors
    • 4.1.1. Drivers
      • 4.1.1.1. Growing Cropp Loss due to Nematode
      • 4.1.1.2. Rising Demand for Organic Food Products
    • 4.1.2. Restraints
      • 4.1.2.1. Slow Speed of Action and Short Shelf Life
    • 4.1.3. Opportunity
    • 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

  • 5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
  • 5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
  • 5.3. Pricing Analysis
  • 5.4. Regulatory Analysis

6. COVID-19 Analysis

  • 6.1. Analysis of COVID-19
    • 6.1.1. Scenario Before COVID
    • 6.1.2. Scenario During COVID
    • 6.1.3. Scenario Post COVID
  • 6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
  • 6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
  • 6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
  • 6.5. Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
  • 6.6. Conclusion

7. By Type

  • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Type
  • 7.2. Microbials *
    • 7.2.1. Introduction
    • 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 7.3. Biochemicals

8. By Form

  • 8.1. Introduction
    • 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Form
  • 8.2. Dry*
    • 8.2.1. Introduction
    • 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 8.3. Liquid

9. By Crop

  • 9.1. Introduction
    • 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop
    • 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Crop
  • 9.2. Cereals & Grains*
    • 9.2.1. Introduction
    • 9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 9.3. Oilseeds & Pulses
  • 9.4. Fruits & Vegetables
  • 9.5. Others

10. By Infestation

  • 10.1. Introduction
    • 10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Infestation
    • 10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Infestation
  • 10.2. Root-Knot Nematodes*
    • 10.2.1. Introduction
    • 10.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 10.3. Cyst Nematodes
  • 10.4. Lesion Nematodes
  • 10.5. Others

11. By Mode of Application

  • 11.1. Introduction
    • 11.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Mode of Application
    • 11.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Mode of Application
  • 11.2. Seed Treatment*
    • 11.2.1. Introduction
    • 11.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 11.3. Soil Treatment
  • 11.4. Foliar Spray
  • 11.5. Others

12. By Region

  • 12.1. Introduction
    • 12.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
    • 12.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
  • 12.2. North America
    • 12.2.1. Introduction
    • 12.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 12.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 12.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 12.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop
    • 12.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Infestation
    • 12.2.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Mode of Application
    • 12.2.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 12.2.8.1. U.S.
      • 12.2.8.2. Canada
      • 12.2.8.3. Mexico
  • 12.3. Europe
    • 12.3.1. Introduction
    • 12.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 12.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 12.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 12.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop
    • 12.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Infestation
    • 12.3.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Mode of Application
    • 12.3.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 12.3.8.1. Germany
      • 12.3.8.2. UK
      • 12.3.8.3. France
      • 12.3.8.4. Italy
      • 12.3.8.5. Russia
      • 12.3.8.6. Rest of Europe
  • 12.4. South America
    • 12.4.1. Introduction
    • 12.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 12.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 12.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 12.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop
    • 12.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Infestation
    • 12.4.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Mode of Application
    • 12.4.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 12.4.8.1. Brazil
      • 12.4.8.2. Argentina
      • 12.4.8.3. Rest of South America
  • 12.5. Asia-Pacific
    • 12.5.1. Introduction
    • 12.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 12.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 12.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 12.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop
    • 12.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Infestation
    • 12.5.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Mode of Application
    • 12.5.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 12.5.8.1. China
      • 12.5.8.2. India
      • 12.5.8.3. Japan
      • 12.5.8.4. Australia
      • 12.5.8.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 12.6. Middle East and Africa
    • 12.6.1. Introduction
    • 12.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 12.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 12.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 12.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop
    • 12.6.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Infestation
    • 12.6.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Mode of Application

13. Competitive Landscape

  • 13.1. Competitive Scenario
  • 13.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
  • 13.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

14. Company Profiles

  • 14.1. FMC Corporation*
    • 14.1.1. Company Overview
    • 14.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
    • 14.1.3. Financial Overview
    • 14.1.4. Recent Developments
  • 14.2. Corteva
  • 14.3. Agri Life
  • 14.4. Certis USA L.L.C.
  • 14.5. Pro Farm Group Inc
  • 14.6. T.Stanes and Company Limited
  • 14.7. Valent BioSciences
  • 14.8. Crop IQ Technology Ltd
  • 14.9. Biotech International Limited
  • 14.10. KILPEST INDIA LTD

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

15. Appendix

  • 15.1. About Us and Services
  • 15.2. Contact Us