首页 > 市场调查报告书 > 材料

杀虫剂

市场调查报告书

商品编码

1447980

农业界面活性剂市场 - 2023-2030

Agricultural Surfactants Market - 2023-2030

出版日期: 2024年03月08日 | 出版商:

DataM Intelligence | 英文 186 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

简介目录

概述

2022年，全球农业界面活性剂市场规模达18亿美元，预计2030年将达29亿美元，2023-2030年预测期间CAGR为6.2%。

随着世界人口的成长，粮食需求也在成长，要求世界各地的农民扩大农业产量。作物病害和昆虫侵袭的增加产生了保护作物的需求。这增加了对杀虫剂和杀虫剂的需求。农用界面活性剂是农药添加剂，可增强农药对农作物的作用，同时几乎没有或没有危害。

製造商正在投资研发，创新新型界面活性剂配方，以增强润湿、铺展和黏附等性能。 2021 年 5 月，Advanced BioCatalytics (ABC) 宣布商业推出新型生物基界面活性剂 BioSS RL。由于其卓越的润湿和发泡性能，BioSS RL 是适用于包括农业在内的不同行业的完美表面活性剂。 BioSS RL 是生物基材料，不含石化产品。

非离子农业界面活性剂由于其多功能性和与多种农业化学品的相容性，占据了一半以上的市场。同样，亚太地区主导着农业界面活性剂市场。印度政府局新闻资料显示，2021-2022年，印度粮食产量达到创纪录的3.157亿吨。不断增长的农业生产需要使用表面活性剂来优化农业化学品的功效并提高作物产量。

动力学

农业化学品的需求不断成长

随着农民努力解决杂草、害虫和疾病压力以保障作物产量，对有效农业化学品解决方案的需求日益增加。根据《我们的世界数据》，2020年农药使用总量为2,661,124吨。农业界面活性剂透过改善其铺展、润湿和吸收能力，在提高这些农业化学品的性能方面发挥关键作用。

透过确保活性成分更好的覆盖和渗透，表面活性剂有助于最大限度地提高农业化学品应用的功效，最终改善作物保护并提高产量。因此，现代农业对农业化学品的依赖日益增加，刺激了对农业界面活性剂的需求，推动市场成长，以满足农业社区不断增长的需求。

提高农作物产量的需要

据粮农组织称，要到2050 年养活91 亿人，全球粮食产量必须在2005/2007 年至2050 年间增加70% 左右。随着全球人口增长和粮食生产压力日益增大，农民正在寻求创新解决方案，以最大限度地提高粮食生产效率。作物生产力。农业界面活性剂透过提高农业化学品的功效发挥至关重要的作用，而农业化学品对于保护农作物免受杂草、害虫和疾病的侵害至关重要。

透过促进这些农业化学物质在植物表面更好的覆盖、黏附和吸收，表面活性剂可确保更有效地防治害虫和杂草，从而使作物更健康并提高产量。随着农民努力满足对食品、饲料和纤维不断增长的需求，采用农业界面活性剂作为综合作物管理策略的一部分变得不可或缺。

严格的规定

由于担心其环境毒性、持久性或对人类健康的潜在风险，监管机构可能会对錶面活性剂配方中使用的某些活性成分实施限製或禁止。此类限制可能会限製配製表面活性剂的关键成分的可用性，迫使製造商重新配製其产品或寻求替代成分，而这可能效果较差或成本更高。

2022年10月，生态环境部发布了《新控污染物名录（2022年）》征求意见稿。在清单上的 14 种新的重点管理污染物中，全氟辛烷磺酸 (PFOS) 和壬基酚这两种常见的界面活性剂预计对农业企业的影响最大。这意味着农药的使用将被完全禁止，因为它们不属于豁免范围。

As the world's population grows, so does food demand, requiring farmers all over the world to expand agricultural output. The increase in crop diseases and attacks by insects has created a need for the protection of crops. This has increased the demand for insecticides and pesticides. Agricultural surfactants are pesticide additives that boost the pesticide's action on crops while posing little or no harm.

Manufacturers are investing in research and development to innovate new surfactant formulations with enhanced properties such as improved wetting, spreading, and adhesion. In May 2021, Advanced BioCatalytics (ABC) announced the commercial launch of BioSS RL, a novel bio-based surfactant. Because of its superior wetting and foaming properties, BioSS RL is a perfect surfactant for different industries including agriculture. BioSS RL is bio-based and has no petrochemicals.

Non-ionic agricultural surfactants account for over half of the market share due to their versatility and compatibility with a wide range of agrochemicals. Similarly, Asia-Pacific dominates the agricultural surfactants market. According to the Press Information of the Bureau, Government of India, in 2021-2022, India produced a record 315.7 million tonnes of food grains. This growing agricultural production necessitates the use of surfactants to optimize the efficacy of agrochemicals and improve crop yields.

Dynamics

Rising Demand for Agrochemicals

As farmers strive to address weed, pest, and disease pressures to safeguard crop yields, the need for effective agrochemical solutions intensifies. According to Our World in Data, the total pesticide use in 2020 was 2,661,124 tonnes. Agricultural surfactants play a pivotal role in enhancing the performance of these agrochemicals by improving their spreading, wetting, and absorption capabilities.

By ensuring better coverage and penetration of active ingredients, surfactants contribute to maximizing the efficacy of agrochemical applications, ultimately leading to improved crop protection and higher yields. As a result, the increasing reliance on agrochemicals in modern agriculture fuels the demand for agricultural surfactants, driving market growth in response to the escalating needs of the farming community.

Need for Enhanced Crop Yields

According to FAO, to feed the 9.1 billion people by the year 2050, global food production must increase by around 70% between 2005/2007 and 2050. With this global population growth and increasing pressure on food production, farmers are seeking innovative solutions to maximize crop productivity. Agricultural surfactants play a crucial role by improving the efficacy of agrochemicals which are essential for protecting crops from weeds, pests, and diseases.

By facilitating better coverage, adhesion, and absorption of these agrochemicals onto plant surfaces, surfactants ensure more effective pest and weed control, leading to healthier crops and increased yields. As farmers strive to meet the growing demand for food, feed, and fiber, the adoption of agricultural surfactants as part of integrated crop management strategies becomes indispensable.

Stringent Regulations

Regulatory authorities may impose restrictions or bans on certain active ingredients used in surfactant formulations due to concerns about their environmental toxicity, persistence, or potential risks to human health. Such restrictions can limit the availability of key ingredients for formulating surfactants, forcing manufacturers to reformulate their products or seek alternative ingredients, which may be less effective or more costly.

In October 2022, The Ministry of Ecology and Environment released a draft of the List of Key new pollutants under Control (2022). Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and nonylphenol, two prevalent surfactants, are anticipated to have the most effects on agricultural businesses out of the 14 new pollutants of priority management on the list. This implies that pesticide uses will be completely prohibited because they are not covered by the exemption.

Segment Analysis

The global agricultural surfactants Market is segmented based on type, substrate type, crop type, application and region.

Low Toxicity and Versatility of Non-Ionic Surfactants

Non-ionic surfactants are highly versatile and compatible with a wide range of agrochemical formulations, including herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, and plant growth regulators. They exhibit excellent compatibility with both acidic and alkaline solutions, as well as with other surfactants and additives commonly used in agricultural formulations. This versatility makes non-ionic surfactants preferred by agrochemical manufacturers.

In March 2020, Wilbur-Ellis Company, a recognized player in precision agriculture, crop protection, seed, and nutritional products, launched EMBRECE-EA, a special combination of surfactants intended to improve the wetting and spreading of spray materials and enhance the effectiveness of fungicides, insecticides, and miticides. EMBRECE-EA's proprietary blend of nonionic surfactants (NIS) enables growers to receive greater coverage and excellent wetting for their selected spray material.

Geographical Penetration

Asia-Pacific's Agricultural Dominance

Asia-Pacific is home to some of the world's largest agricultural economies, including China and India. The large use of pesticides made the Asia Pacific the largest market for agricultural surfactants. According to the Directorate of Plant Protection, Quarantine & Storage, Government of India, the total consumption of chemical pesticides in India was 52466.45 metric tons. This growth further fuels the demand for agricultural surfactants as essential ingredients in agrochemical formulations.

Precision farming is also becoming more popular in the region, with the usage of effective crop protection technologies like air-assisted chemical spraying, which is driving demand for high-performance adjuvants and driving market expansion in this area. The technological advancement in modern farming in Asia-Pacific has given a boost to the market.

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

Covid had a severe negative impact on the surfactant market. Demand for chemicals has been suffering a severe shock across multiple application-use markets. This is mainly because Covid-19 has upset the supply chain. This affected the production and availability of agricultural surfactants, leading to temporary supply constraints and price fluctuations.

Globally lockdowns and movement restrictions imposed to curb the spread of the virus disrupted agricultural activities such as planting, harvesting, and pest control operations. This affected the overall demand for agricultural surfactants as farmers postponed or reduced their use of various chemicals in the agricultural field during periods of uncertainty.

Russia-Ukraine War Impact Analysis

The conflict in the region has disrupted supply chains for agricultural inputs, including surfactants. Disruptions in transportation and logistics have led to shortages of these raw materials, impacting the availability and pricing of agricultural surfactants globally. The conflict has also disrupted agricultural production in Ukraine, a major exporter of agricultural commodities. Reduced agricultural output in Ukraine led to lower demand for surfactants in the region, affecting market growth.

By Type

Anionic Surfactants
Cationic Surfactants
Non-Ionic Surfactants
Atmospheric Surfactants

By Substrate Type

Synthetic
Bio-based

By Crop Type

Grains and Cereals
Pulses and Oilseeds
Fruits and Vegetables
Turf and Ornamental Grass
Others

By Application

Herbicides
Fungicides
Insecticides
Plant Growth Regulators
Others

By Region

North America
- U.S.
- Canada
- Mexico
Europe
- Germany
- UK
- France
- Italy
- Russia
- Rest of Europe
South America
- Brazil
- Argentina
- Rest of South America
Asia-Pacific
- China
- India
- Japan
- Australia
- Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East and Africa

Key Developments

In January 2024, Bionema Group, developer of sustainable biocontrol solutions for crop protection and plant health management, introduced Soil-Jet BSP100, a biodegradable surfactant for agrochemicals and agricultural biologicals. The unique Polyether-Modified Polysiloxane technology of the Soil-Jet BSP100 is poised to revolutionize fertigation and irrigation techniques globally.
In February 2023, to maintain soil health and biodiversity, Pangaea Biosciences Ltd., a UK-based company focused on designing crop protection solutions, introduced a novel plant-based surfactant formulation technique to replace hazardous surfactants with natural plant-based components. These surfactants reduce soil fertility and health by killing bacteria and fungi in the soil when sprayed on crops.
In August 2021, CHS Agronomy, a global agribusiness cooperative, announced the latest offerings in its line of high-performance adjuvants which includes Last Chance Pro, a non-ionic surfactant. Last Chance Pro provides superior weed control of numerous herbicides, including glyphosate and glufosinate, along with a low use rate and good handling qualities.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players in the market include ADAMA, Nufarm, Bayer AG, Loveland Products, Inc., Wilbur-Ellis Holdings, Inc., Evonik Industries AG, BASF SE, Corteva, Stepan Company, Innvictis Crop Care, LLC

Why Purchase the Report?

To visualize the global agricultural surfactants market segmentation based on type, substrate type, crop type, application, and region as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
Excel data sheet with numerous data points of agricultural surfactants market-level with all segments.
PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
Product mapping available as excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global agricultural surfactants Market report would provide approximately 70 tables, 66 figures and 186 Pages.

Target Audience 2023

Manufacturers/ Buyers
Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
Research Professionals
Emerging Companies

1.Methodology and Scope

1.1.Research Methodology
1.2.Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2.Definition and Overview

3.Executive Summary

3.1.Snippet by Type
3.2.Snippet by Substrate Type
3.3.Snippet by Crop Type
3.4.Snippet by Application
3.5.Snippet by Region

4.Dynamics

4.1.Impacting Factors
- 4.1.1.Drivers
  - 4.1.1.1.Rising Demand for Agrochemicals
  - 4.1.1.2.Need for Enhanced Crop Yields
- 4.1.2.Restraints
  - 4.1.2.1.Stringent Regulations
- 4.1.3.Opportunity
- 4.1.4.Impact Analysis

5.Industry Analysis

5.1.Porter's Five Force Analysis
5.2.Supply Chain Analysis
5.3.Pricing Analysis
5.4.Regulatory Analysis
5.5.Russia-Ukraine War Impact Analysis
5.6.DMI Opinion

6.COVID-19 Analysis

6.1.Analysis of COVID-19
- 6.1.1.Scenario Before COVID
- 6.1.2.Scenario During COVID
- 6.1.3.Scenario Post COVID
6.2.Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
6.3.Demand-Supply Spectrum
6.4.Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
6.5.Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
6.6.Conclusion

7.By Type

7.1.Introduction
- 7.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 7.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Type
7.2.Anionic Surfactants*
- 7.2.1.Introduction
- 7.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
7.3.Cationic Surfactants
7.4.Non-Ionic Surfactants
7.5.Atmospheric Surfactants

8.By Substrate Type

8.1.Introduction
- 8.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Substrate Type
- 8.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Substrate Type
8.2.Synthetic*
- 8.2.1.Introduction
- 8.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
8.3.Bio-based

9.By Crop Type

9.1.Introduction
- 9.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop Type
- 9.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Crop Type
9.2.Grains and Cereals*
- 9.2.1.Introduction
- 9.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
9.3.Pulses and Oilseeds
9.4.Fruits and Vegetables
9.5.Turf and Ornamental Grass
9.6.Others

10.By Application

10.1.Introduction
- 10.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 10.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Application
10.2.Herbicides*
- 10.2.1.Introduction
- 10.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
10.3.Fungicides
10.4.Insecticides
10.5.Plant Growth Regulators
10.6.Others

11.By Region

11.1.Introduction
- 11.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
- 11.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
11.2.North America
- 11.2.1.Introduction
- 11.2.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.2.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 11.2.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Substrate Type
- 11.2.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop Type
- 11.2.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 11.2.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 11.2.7.1.U.S.
  - 11.2.7.2.Canada
  - 11.2.7.3.Mexico
11.3.Europe
- 11.3.1.Introduction
- 11.3.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.3.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 11.3.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Substrate Type
- 11.3.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop Type
- 11.3.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 11.3.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 11.3.7.1.Germany
  - 11.3.7.2.UK
  - 11.3.7.3.France
  - 11.3.7.4.Italy
  - 11.3.7.5.Russia
  - 11.3.7.6.Rest of Europe
11.4.South America
- 11.4.1.Introduction
- 11.4.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.4.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 11.4.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Substrate Type
- 11.4.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop Type
- 11.4.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 11.4.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 11.4.7.1.Brazil
  - 11.4.7.2.Argentina
  - 11.4.7.3.Rest of South America
11.5.Asia-Pacific
- 11.5.1.Introduction
- 11.5.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.5.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 11.5.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Substrate Type
- 11.5.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop Type
- 11.5.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 11.5.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 11.5.7.1.China
  - 11.5.7.2.India
  - 11.5.7.3.Japan
  - 11.5.7.4.Australia
  - 11.5.7.5.Rest of Asia-Pacific
11.6.Middle East and Africa
- 11.6.1.Introduction
- 11.6.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.6.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 11.6.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Substrate Type
- 11.6.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop Type
- 11.6.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application

12.Competitive Landscape

12.1.Competitive Scenario
12.2.Market Positioning/Share Analysis
12.3.Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

13.Company Profiles

13.1.ADAMA*
- 13.1.1.Company Overview
- 13.1.2.Product Portfolio and Description
- 13.1.3.Financial Overview
- 13.1.4.Key Developments
13.2.Nufarm
13.3.Bayer AG
13.4.Loveland Products, Inc.
13.5.Wilbur-Ellis Holdings, Inc.
13.6.Evonik Industries AG
13.7.BASF SE
13.8.Corteva
13.9.Stepan Company
13.10.Innvictis Crop Care, LLC

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE