封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1696236

全球生物刺激素市场 - 2025 至 2032 年

Global Biostimulants Market - 2025-2032

出版日期: | 出版商: DataM Intelligence | 英文 180 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

简介目录

2024 年全球生物刺激素市场规模达到 42.0212 亿美元,预计到 2032 年将达到 105.8901 亿美元,2025-2032 年复合年增长率为 12.4%。

受永续农业实践、提高作物生产力和环境保护的需求不断增长的推动,全球生物刺激素市场正在经历显着增长。市场正在迅速扩张,技术进步、监管支持和农民意识的提高促进了市场的成长。

干旱、洪水和高温等极端天气条件对农作物产量产生了负面影响。生物刺激素,特别是海藻萃取物、甜菜碱和硅基产品,可透过增强植物的天然防御机制帮助植物增强对非生物胁迫的抵抗力。例如,干旱、盐度和极端温度等环境压力会严重降低植物的生长和农作物的产量。生物刺激素透过活化植物的防御机制使其更能抵御这些压力。例如,它们可以诱导与压力相关的蛋白质和抗氧化剂的产生,从而保护细胞免受损害。

此外,有机农业和无残留农业的快速成长也推动了对生物刺激素的需求。欧盟、美国农业部和印度农业研究理事会(ICAR)等监管机构正积极鼓励使用生物刺激素作为永续投入。随着有机食品消费量的增加,农民开始使用生物刺激素来取代合成肥料和杀虫剂。

市场动态

司机 - 崛起有机农业

对有机食品的需求不断增长,促使农民采用有机农业方式,减少对合成肥料和杀虫剂的依赖。生物刺激素可以自然地促进营养吸收和植物生长,与有机农业原则完全一致。

例如,在欧洲,植物生物刺激素受到欧盟肥料产品法规 (FPR)(法规 (EU) 2019/1009)的监管,该法规于 2022 年 7 月 16 日生效,将其定义为刺激植物营养过程的产品,旨在提高养分利用效率和其他植物性状。

此外,据欧洲生物刺激素工业委员会 (EBIC) 称,它积极与政策制定者和监管机构合作,以应对挑战并促进生物刺激素更顺利地进入市场。这包括研究与动物副产品、微生物和工业副产品有关的问题。与欧盟委员会代表和公告机构定期举行研讨会和讨论,确保生物刺激素产业的担忧得到倾听和解决。气候变迁和土壤退化对粮食安全和农民生计构成了现实威胁,EBIC 的 2024 年宣言提出了一个愿景,即利用植物生物刺激素的力量正面解决这些问题。

此外,全球向有机食品消费的转变是推动生物刺激素市场发展的一个主要因素。越来越多的消费者选择不含化学物质且可持续种植的农产品,促使农民采用有机农业实践。由于有机农业限制使用合成肥料和杀虫剂,生物刺激素成为增强作物生长、土壤肥力和抗逆性的天然替代品。

约束——产品品质的差异

限制生物刺激素市场成长的主要挑战之一是产品品质和功效的不一致。由于该行业仍处于早期发展阶段,品质控制标准仍不统一,导致人们对产品的可靠性和有效性存在担忧。

许多生物刺激素产品可能缺乏适当的成分浓度、含有未经验证的化合物或未能提供承诺的益处,最终降低农民的信任和市场渗透率。

例如,欧洲进行的一项研究发现,经过测试的近 30% 的生物刺激素产品并不含有所声称浓度的活性成分。

这种不一致给农民带来了不确定性,他们需要能够为他们的作物提供可预测和可衡量的效益的产品。同样,在美国,生物刺激素产业工作小组(BIWG)强调,缺乏统一的产品定义和品质基准,使得监管机构难以执行标籤和性能声明,导致农业生产者产生怀疑。

此外,对更高透明度和标准化测试程序的需求使生物刺激素製造商难以获得信誉。儘管欧洲生物刺激素工业委员会 (EBIC) 和美国农业部等组织正在努力製定更清晰的监管框架,但目前缺乏执法仍然是广泛市场采用的障碍。

目录

第 1 章:方法与范围

第 2 章:定义与概述

第 3 章:执行摘要

第 4 章:动态

  • 影响因素
    • 驱动程式
      • 有机农业崛起
      • 有利的政府政策和法规
    • 限制
      • 产品品质不稳定
      • 现场测试不足
    • 机会
    • 影响分析

第五章:产业分析

  • 波特五力分析
  • 供应链分析
  • 定价分析
  • 监管分析
  • 可持续性分析
  • DMI 意见

第 6 章:按成分

    • 黄腐酸
    • 腐植酸
    • 胺基酸
    • 其他的
  • 微生物
  • 海藻萃取物
  • 其他的

第 7 章:按形式

  • 液体
  • 坚硬的

第 8 章:依作物类型

  • 谷物与谷类
  • 水果和蔬菜
  • 油籽
  • 草坪和观赏植物
  • 其他的

第九章:按应用

  • 叶面
  • 土壤
  • 种子

第 10 章:按地区

  • 北美洲
    • 我们
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 欧洲
    • 德国
    • 英国
    • 法国
    • 义大利
    • 西班牙
    • 欧洲其他地区
  • 南美洲
    • 巴西
    • 阿根廷
    • 南美洲其他地区
  • 亚太
    • 中国
    • 印度
    • 日本
    • 澳洲
    • 亚太其他地区
  • 中东和非洲

第 11 章:竞争格局

  • 竞争格局
  • 市场定位/份额分析
  • 併购分析

第 12 章:公司简介

  • Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.
    • 公司概况
    • 产品组合和描述
    • 财务概览
    • 关键进展
  • BASF SE
  • Syngenta
  • UPL
  • Yara
  • Corteva
  • Nufarm
  • PI Industries
  • Haifa Group
  • Bayer AG

第 13 章:附录

简介目录
Product Code: AG1544

Global biostimulants market reached US$ 4,202.12 million in 2024 and is expected to reach US$ 10,589.01 million by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 12.4% from 2025-2032.

The global biostimulants market is experiencing significant growth, driven by the increasing demand for sustainable agricultural practices, improved crop productivity and environmental protection. The market is expanding rapidly, with technological advancements, regulatory support and increasing awareness among farmers contributing to its growth.

Extreme weather conditions such as droughts, floods and heat stress are negatively impacting crop yields. Biostimulants, particularly seaweed extracts, betaine and silicon-based products, help plants develop resistance to abiotic stress by strengthening their natural defense mechanisms. For instance, environmental stresses such as drought, salinity and extreme temperatures can severely reduce plant growth and crop yields. Biostimulants make plants more resilient to these stresses by activating their defense mechanisms. For example, they can induce the production of stress-related proteins and antioxidants that protect cells from damage.

Additionally, the rapid growth of organic farming and residue-free agriculture is fueling the demand for biostimulants. Regulatory bodies such as the European Union, USDA and the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) are actively encouraging the use of biostimulants as sustainable inputs. With organic food consumption on the rise, farmers are shifting toward biostimulants as an alternative to synthetic fertilizers and pesticides.

Market Dynamics

Driver - Rising Organic Farming

The growing demand for organic food has led farmers to adopt organic farming practices, reducing reliance on synthetic fertilizers and pesticides. Biostimulants, which enhance nutrient uptake and plant growth naturally, align perfectly with organic farming principles.

For instance, in Europe, plant biostimulants are regulated under the EU Fertilizing Products Regulation (FPR), Regulation (EU) 2019/1009, which came into effect on July 16, 2022, defining them as products that stimulate plant nutrition processes, aiming to improve nutrient use efficiency and other plant traits.

Additionally, according to the European Biostimulants Industry Council (EBIC), it actively engages with policymakers and regulatory bodies to address challenges and facilitate smoother market entry for biostimulants. This includes working on issues related to animal by-products, microbials and industrial by-products. Regular workshops and discussions with European Commission representatives and notified bodies ensure that the biostimulant industry's concerns are heard and addressed. With climate change and soil degradation posing a very real threat to food security and farmer livelihoods, EBIC's 2024 manifesto puts forward a vision that leverages the power of plant biostimulants to address these issues head-on.

Additionally, the global shift toward organic food consumption is a major factor driving the biostimulants market. Consumers are increasingly choosing chemical-free and sustainably grown produce, prompting farmers to adopt organic farming practices. Since synthetic fertilizers and pesticides are restricted in organic farming, biostimulants serve as a natural alternative to enhance crop growth, soil fertility and stress tolerance.

Restraint - Variability in Product Quality

One of the major challenges restraining the growth of the biostimulants market is the inconsistency in product quality and efficacy. Since the industry is still in its early stages of development, quality control standards remain unstandardized, leading to concerns regarding product reliability and effectiveness.

Many biostimulant products may lack proper ingredient concentration, contain unverified compounds or fail to deliver the promised benefits, ultimately reducing farmer trust and market penetration.

For instance, a study conducted in Europe found that nearly 30% of biostimulant products tested did not contain the listed active ingredients in the claimed concentrations.

This inconsistency creates uncertainty for farmers, who need products that provide predictable and measurable benefits for their crops. Similarly, in the United States, the Biostimulant Industry Working Group (BIWG) has highlighted that the lack of uniform product definitions and quality benchmarks makes it difficult for regulatory authorities to enforce labeling and performance claims, leading to skepticism among agricultural producers.

Furthermore, the need for more transparency and standardized testing procedures has made it difficult for biostimulant manufacturers to gain credibility. While organizations like the European Biostimulants Industry Council (EBIC) and USDA are working towards developing clearer regulatory frameworks, the current lack of enforcement remains a hurdle for widespread market adoption.

Segment Analysis

Acid-Based Biostimulants: Driving Market Growth Amid Rising Demand for Sustainable Agriculture

The acids segment plays a crucial role in driving the growth of the global biostimulants market, as humic acids, fulvic acids and amino acids are widely recognized for their ability to enhance plant health, nutrient absorption and stress tolerance. Humic and fulvic acids improve soil structure, increase microbial activity and enhance root growth, making them essential in regions with poor soil fertility, such as parts of Africa and India.

In Spain, vineyards and olive farms increasingly use humic acid-based biostimulants to improve drought resistance and boost yields. Similarly, in the U.S., large-scale soybean and corn farmers integrate fulvic acid biostimulants to enhance nutrient uptake and reduce dependency on chemical fertilizers. Amino acids, another key sub-segment, are extensively used in horticulture, especially in China and Japan, to improve flowering, fruit set and crop resilience.

Major agrochemical companies like Valagro and UPL are investing in acid-based biostimulants, launching innovative products that cater to both organic and conventional farming. With the increasing shift towards sustainable agriculture and the need for higher crop productivity, the acids segment continues to drive the biostimulants market's expansion globally.

Humic and fulvic acids are essential components in agriculture, significantly enhancing soil structure, nutrient availability and plant resilience. Humic acids, being larger molecules, improve soil aggregation, porosity and water retention, making them crucial in drought-prone regions like parts of Africa and India, where farmers use humic-based soil conditioners to reduce irrigation needs.

Geographical Penetration

Biostimulants Trends in North America

North America holds a significant share of the global biostimulants market due to the growing adoption of sustainable agriculture and organic farming practices, novel product launches, government funding and advanced R&D capabilities are driving market growth in biostimulant products, driven by consumer demand for chemical-free and eco-friendly agricultural products.

For instance, in November 2024, Yara North America is launched the YaraAmplix biostimulant portfolio in the US and Canada, marking a significant milestone in promoting a sustainable, resilient food system. The portfolio, backed by over five years of research, aims to improve crop resilience, nutrient uptake, soil health and environmental adaptability.

Moreover, in February 2024, ICL Growing Solutions North America has launched BIOZ biostimulant Diamond 10-0-1, a carbon and nitrogen fertilizer designed to improve soil-plant relationships, currently available in the US market as a proven microbial solution for farmers and growers.

The biostimulants in US is expected to grow, especially in row crops like corn and soybeans. Despite slow adoption, biostimulants offer solutions to improve yields and manage costs, making them a compelling option as regulatory pressure increases and conventional crop protection products face restrictions.

Competitive Landscape

The biostimulants market in 2024 presents a dynamic and evolving competitive landscape. While the industry remains fragmented, with smaller and specialized companies making up 44.61% of the market, a growing concentration is evident among leading players.

BASF SE stands out as the market leader, commanding a 15.36% share, reflecting its strong presence and diverse biostimulant portfolio. Close behind, Syngenta holds 13.54%, reinforcing the dominance of major agricultural firms in this sector. UPL follows with 11.26%, showcasing its expanding influence and commitment to biostimulant solutions.

Bayer AG also plays a significant role, securing 8.18% of the market, signaling its continued investment in this space. Meanwhile, Yara, traditionally known for fertilizers, holds a 7.05% share, highlighting a growing synergy between conventional nutrient providers and biostimulant innovations.

Key Developments

  • In October 2024, BASF SE expanded its BioSolutions portfolio by incorporating seaweed biostimulants from Acadian Plant Health, a leading marine plant company in Dartmouth, Canada. This partnership enhances BASF SE's biological offerings, broadens product availability in new markets and supports sustainable crop growth.
  • In November 2024, Syngenta Canada Inc. introduced YieldON, a liquid foliar biostimulant that helps improve crop productivity in cereals, corn and other row crops.
  • In January 2023, Sumitomo Chemical acquired FBSciences Holdings, Inc., a U.S.-based company specializing in biostimulants, which are naturally derived agricultural materials and a category of biorationals. The acquisition, set to be completed following the necessary procedures, marks Sumitomo Chemical's strategic move towards a full-scale entry into the biostimulant sector.

Why Choose DataM Intelligence?

  • Data-Driven Insights: Dive into detailed analyses with granular insights such as pricing, market shares and value chain evaluations, enriched by interviews with industry leaders and disruptors.
  • Post-Purchase Support and Expert Analyst Consultations: As a valued client, gain direct access to our expert analysts for personalized advice and strategic guidance, tailored to your specific needs and challenges.
  • White Papers and Case Studies: Benefit quarterly from our in-depth studies related to your purchased titles, tailored to refine your operational and marketing strategies for maximum impact.
  • Annual Updates on Purchased Reports: As an existing customer, enjoy the privilege of annual updates to your reports, ensuring you stay abreast of the latest market insights and technological advancements. Terms and conditions apply.
  • Specialized Focus on Emerging Markets: DataM differentiates itself by delivering in-depth, specialized insights specifically for emerging markets, rather than offering generalized geographic overviews. This approach equips our clients with a nuanced understanding and actionable intelligence that are essential for navigating and succeeding in high-growth regions.
  • Value of DataM Reports: Our reports offer specialized insights tailored to the latest trends and specific business inquiries. This personalized approach provides a deeper, strategic perspective, ensuring you receive the precise information necessary to make informed decisions. These insights complement and go beyond what is typically available in generic databases

Table of Contents

1. Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1. Research Methodology
  • 1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Snippet by Ingredient
  • 3.2. Snippet by Form
  • 3.3. Snippet by Crop Type
  • 3.4. Snippet by Application
  • 3.5. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

  • 4.1. Impacting Factors
    • 4.1.1. Drivers
      • 4.1.1.1. Rising Organic Farming
      • 4.1.1.2. Favorable Government Policies and Regulations
    • 4.1.2. Restraints
      • 4.1.2.1. Variability in Product Quality
      • 4.1.2.2. Insufficient Field Testing
    • 4.1.3. Opportunity
    • 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

  • 5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
  • 5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
  • 5.3. Pricing Analysis
  • 5.4. Regulatory Analysis
  • 5.5. Sustainable Analysis
  • 5.6. DMI Opinion

6. By Ingredient

  • 6.1. Introduction
    • 6.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Ingredient
    • 6.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Ingredient
  • 6.2. Acids*
    • 6.2.1. Introduction
    • 6.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
    • 6.2.3. Fulvic Acid
    • 6.2.4. Humic Acid
    • 6.2.5. Amino Acid
    • 6.2.6. Others
  • 6.3. Microbial
  • 6.4. Seaweed Extracts
  • 6.5. Others

7. By Form

  • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Form
  • 7.2. Liquid*
    • 7.2.1. Introduction
    • 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 7.3. Solid

8. By Crop Type

  • 8.1. Introduction
    • 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop Type
    • 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Crop Type
  • 8.2. Cereals & Grains*
    • 8.2.1. Introduction
    • 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 8.3. Fruits & Vegetables
  • 8.4. Oilseeds
  • 8.5. Turf & Ornamentals
  • 8.6. Others

9. By Application

  • 9.1. Introduction
    • 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Application
  • 9.2. Foliar*
    • 9.2.1. Introduction
    • 9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 9.3. Soil
  • 9.4. Seed

10. By Region

  • 10.1. Introduction
    • 10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
    • 10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
  • 10.2. North America
    • 10.2.1. Introduction
    • 10.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Ingredient
    • 10.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 10.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop Type
    • 10.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 10.2.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.2.7.1. US
      • 10.2.7.2. Canada
      • 10.2.7.3. Mexico
  • 10.3. Europe
    • 10.3.1. Introduction
    • 10.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Ingredient
    • 10.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 10.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop Type
    • 10.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 10.3.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.3.7.1. Germany
      • 10.3.7.2. UK
      • 10.3.7.3. France
      • 10.3.7.4. Italy
      • 10.3.7.5. Spain
      • 10.3.7.6. Rest of Europe
  • 10.4. South America
    • 10.4.1. Introduction
    • 10.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.4.3. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Ingredient
    • 10.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 10.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop Type
    • 10.4.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 10.4.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.4.8.1. Brazil
      • 10.4.8.2. Argentina
      • 10.4.8.3. Rest of South America
  • 10.5. Asia-Pacific
    • 10.5.1. Introduction
    • 10.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Ingredient
    • 10.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 10.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop Type
    • 10.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 10.5.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.5.7.1. China
      • 10.5.7.2. India
      • 10.5.7.3. Japan
      • 10.5.7.4. Australia
      • 10.5.7.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 10.6. Middle East and Africa
    • 10.6.1. Introduction
    • 10.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Ingredient
    • 10.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 10.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop Type
    • 10.6.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application

11. Competitive Landscape

  • 11.1. Competitive Scenario
  • 11.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
  • 11.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

12. Company Profiles

  • 12.1. Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.*
    • 12.1.1. Company Overview
    • 12.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
    • 12.1.3. Financial Overview
    • 12.1.4. Key Developments
  • 12.2. BASF SE
  • 12.3. Syngenta
  • 12.4. UPL
  • 12.5. Yara
  • 12.6. Corteva
  • 12.7. Nufarm
  • 12.8. PI Industries
  • 12.9. Haifa Group
  • 12.10. Bayer AG

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

13. Appendix

  • 13.1. About Us and Services
  • 13.2. Contact Us