查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
直接提锂(DLE)的全球市场(2025年～2035年)
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1595743

直接提锂(DLE)的全球市场(2025年～2035年)

The Global Direct Lithium Extraction (DLE) Market 2025-2035
出版日期: | 出版商: Future Markets, Inc. | 英文 160 Pages, 87 Tables, 20 Figures | 订单完成后即时交付

价格

在可持续锂生产以支持不断增长的电动汽车行业的迫切需求的推动下，全球直接锂提取 (DLE) 市场正在迅速扩张。 DLE 技术将生产时间从18-24 个月大幅缩短至1-2 天，回收率提高70-90%，用水量减少90%，土地占用量减少80%，这与传统方法相比具有显着优势，包括减少对环境的影响。预计到2030年，电动车市场规模将超过2.5亿辆，每年将需要3至400万吨碳酸锂。

全球大规模商业开发正在加速，DLE计画在主要地区落地。该领域的资本投资预计到2023年将达到25亿美元，到2030年将超过150亿美元。该技术具有有吸引力的经济效益，生​​产成本比传统方法低20-30%，投资回收期短，为3-5 年，但技术规模扩大、初始资本要求高、课题仍然存在，例如需要针对特定地点进行最佳化。儘管有这些课题，DLE 仍代表锂生产转型的机遇，将技术创新与环境永续性和经济效益结合。

本报告研究和分析了全球直接锂提取 (DLE) 市场，并提供了有关市场动态、创新和成长机会的详细见解。

目录

第1章 摘要整理

  • 市场概要
    • 锂的生产和需求
    • 传统的开采方法的问题点
    • 直接提锂市场
    • 直接提锂市场成长轨道
    • 主要的市场区隔
  • 市场预测
    • 短期预测(2024年～2026年)
    • 中期预测(2026年～2030年)
    • 长期预测(2030年～2035年)
  • 推动市场要素
    • 电动车的成长
    • 能源储存需求
    • 政府的政策
    • 技术的进步
    • 永续性的目标
    • 供给的安全性
  • 市场课题
    • 技术障碍
    • 经济可行性
    • 扩大规模问题
    • 资源可用性
    • 监理障碍
    • 衝突
  • 商业活动
    • 市场地图
    • 全球锂开采计划
    • DLE计划
    • 经营模式
    • 投资

第2章 简介

  • 锂的用途
  • 锂卤水矿床
  • 定义及工作原理
    • 基本概念与机制
    • 製程化学
    • 科技的演变
  • DLE技术类型
    • 咸水资源
    • 硬岩资源
    • 沉积物中所含的矿床
    • 离子交换
    • 吸附
    • 膜分离
    • 溶剂萃取
    • 电化学萃取
    • 化学沉淀
    • 新的混合方法
  • 相对于传统萃取方法的优势
    • 回收率
    • 环境影响
    • 处理时间
    • 产品纯度
  • DLE 技术比较
  • 价格
  • 环境影响与永续性
  • 能源需求
  • 用水
  • 回收率
    • 依技术型
    • 依资源类型
    • 可优化性
  • 可扩充性
  • 资源分析
    • 咸水资源
    • 黏土矿床
    • 地热水
    • 资源品质评估
    • 可萃取性

第3章 全球市场的分析

  • 市场规模与成长
  • 市场占有率:各地区
    • 北美
    • 南美
    • 亚太地区
    • 欧洲
  • 成本分析
    • CAPEX的比较
    • OPEX的明细
    • 每1吨的成本的分析
  • 供需的动态
    • 目前供给
    • 需求的预测
  • 规则
  • 竞争情形

第4章 企业简介(64公司的企业简介)

第5章 附录

第6章 参考文献

The global Direct Lithium Extraction (DLE) market is undergoing rapid expansion, driven by the pressing demand for sustainable lithium production to support the growing electric vehicle industry. DLE technologies offer significant advantages over traditional methods, including dramatic reduction in production time from 18-24 months to 1-2 days, increased recovery rates of 70-90%, and substantially reduced environmental impact through 90% lower water consumption and 80% smaller land footprint. The EV market's projection of 250+ million vehicles by 2030 necessitates 3-4 million tons of lithium carbonate equivalent annually, creating a substantial supply gap that DLE is positioned to address.

Major commercial developments are accelerating globally, with companies implementing DLE projects across key regions. Capital investment in the sector reached $2.5 billion in 2023 and is expected to exceed $15 billion by 2030, focusing on advanced sorbent materials, process automation, and renewable energy integration. While the technology offers compelling economics with 20-30% lower production costs than traditional methods and shorter payback periods of 3-5 years, challenges remain in technology scale-up, high initial capital requirements, and site-specific optimization needs. Despite these challenges, DLE represents a transformative opportunity in lithium production, combining technological innovation with environmental sustainability and economic viability.

"The Global Direct Lithium Extraction (DLE) Market 2025-2035" analyzes the sector, providing detailed insights into market dynamics, technological innovations, and growth opportunities. The report combines extensive primary research with detailed secondary analysis of market trends, competitive landscapes, and technological developments. The study examines key DLE technologies including ion exchange, adsorption, membrane separation, solvent extraction, and electrochemical methods, providing comparative analysis of their performance metrics, cost structures, and commercial viability. It evaluates various extraction processes against traditional methods, analyzing recovery rates, environmental impact, processing times, and product purity.

Key market segments covered include technology types, resource types (brines, clays, geothermal waters), and geographical regions. The report provides detailed market size projections, with breakdowns by technology and region, supported by comprehensive data on market drivers including EV growth, energy storage demand, and government policies.

Report contents include:

  • Detailed market size and growth projections through 2035
  • Technology comparison and performance analysis
  • Cost analysis including CAPEX and OPEX breakdowns
  • Environmental impact and sustainability assessments
  • Competitive landscape analysis featuring 64 companies. Companies profiled include Adionics, Aepnus Technology, American Battery Materials, Anson Resources, Arcadium Lithium, Albemarle Corporation, alkaLi, Arizona Lithium, BioMettallum, Century Lithium, CleanTech Lithium, Conductive Energy, Controlled Thermal Resources, Cornish Lithium, E3 Lithium, Ekosolve, ElectraLith, Ellexco, EnergyX, Energy Sourcer Minerals, Eon Minerals, Eramet, Evove, ExSorbiton, Geo40, Geolith, Go2Lithium, International Battery Metals, Jintai Lithium, Koch Technology Solutions, KMX Technologies, Lake Resources, Lanke Lithium, Lihytech, Lilac Solutions, LithiumBank, Lithios, Mangrove Lithium, MVP Lithium, Novalith, Olukun Minerals, PureLi, Posco, Precision Periodic, Qinghai Chaidamu Xinghua Lithium Salt Co., Saltworks Technologies, SLB, Solvay, SpecifX and more.....These companies span the DLE value chain from technology developers to project operators, with solutions ranging from ion exchange and membrane technologies to electrochemical extraction methods. The profiles analyze each company's technological approach, commercial development stage, strategic partnerships, and market positioning within the rapidly evolving DLE landscape.
  • Regional market analysis covering North America, South America, Asia Pacific, and Europe
  • Resource analysis including brine chemistry and extraction potential
  • Commercial project analysis and investment trends

The analysis covers critical market drivers including electric vehicle adoption, energy storage demand, government policies, and technological advancements. It addresses key challenges such as technical barriers, economic viability, scale-up issues, and regulatory hurdles.

Special focus areas include:

  • Comparative analysis of DLE technologies and their commercial readiness
  • Environmental and sustainability implications
  • Resource quality assessment and extraction potential
  • Economic analysis including capital costs and operating expenses
  • Regulatory framework and policy impacts
  • Supply-demand dynamics and price trends

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  • 1.1. Market Overview
    • 1.1.1. Lithium production and demand
      • 1.1.1.1. DLE Projects
      • 1.1.1.2. Global Lithium Production and Demand 2020-2024 (ktpa LCE)
      • 1.1.1.3. Lithium Production Forecast 2025-2035
    • 1.1.2. Issues with traditional extraction methods
    • 1.1.3. The Direct Lithium Extraction market
    • 1.1.4. Growth trajectory for The Direct Lithium Extraction market
    • 1.1.5. Key market segments
  • 1.2. Market forecasts
    • 1.2.1. Short-term outlook (2024-2026)
    • 1.2.2. Medium-term forecasts (2026-2030)
    • 1.2.3. Long-term predictions (2030-2035)
  • 1.3. Market Drivers
    • 1.3.1. Electric Vehicle Growth
    • 1.3.2. Energy Storage Demand
    • 1.3.3. Government Policies
    • 1.3.4. Technological Advancements
      • 1.3.4.1. Process improvements
      • 1.3.4.2. Efficiency gains
      • 1.3.4.3. Cost reduction
    • 1.3.5. Sustainability Goals
    • 1.3.6. Supply Security
  • 1.4. Market Challenges
    • 1.4.1. Technical Barriers
    • 1.4.2. Economic Viability
    • 1.4.3. Scale-up Issues
    • 1.4.4. Resource Availability
    • 1.4.5. Regulatory Hurdles
    • 1.4.6. Competition
      • 1.4.6.1. Traditional methods
      • 1.4.6.2. Alternative technologies
  • 1.5. Commercial activity
    • 1.5.1. Market map
    • 1.5.2. Global lithium extraction projects
    • 1.5.3. DLE Projects
    • 1.5.4. Business models
    • 1.5.5. Investments

2. INTRODUCTION

  • 2.1. Applications of lithium
  • 2.2. Lithium brine deposits
  • 2.3. Definition and Working Principles
    • 2.3.1. Basic concepts and mechanisms
    • 2.3.2. Process chemistry
    • 2.3.3. Technology evolution
  • 2.4. Types of DLE Technologies
    • 2.4.1. Brine Resources
    • 2.4.2. Hard Rock Resources
    • 2.4.3. Sediment-hosted deposits
    • 2.4.4. Ion Exchange
      • 2.4.4.1. Resin-based systems
      • 2.4.4.2. Inorganic ion exchangers
      • 2.4.4.3. Hybrid systems
      • 2.4.4.4. Companies
      • 2.4.4.5. SWOT analysis
    • 2.4.5. Adsorption
      • 2.4.5.1. Adsorption vs ion exchange
      • 2.4.5.2. Physical adsorption
      • 2.4.5.3. Chemical adsorption
      • 2.4.5.4. Selective materials
        • 2.4.5.4.1. Ion sieves
        • 2.4.5.4.2. Sorbent Composites
      • 2.4.5.5. Companies
      • 2.4.5.6. SWOT analysis
    • 2.4.6. Membrane Separation
      • 2.4.6.1. Pressure-assisted
        • 2.4.6.1.1. Reverse osmosis (RO)
        • 2.4.6.1.2. Membrane fouling
        • 2.4.6.1.3. Microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), and nanofiltration (NF)
      • 2.4.6.2. Potential-assisted
        • 2.4.6.2.1. Electrodialysis
        • 2.4.6.2.2. Bipolar
        • 2.4.6.2.3. Capacitive deionization (CDI)
        • 2.4.6.2.4. Membrane distillation (MD)
      • 2.4.6.3. Companies
      • 2.4.6.4. SWOT analysis
    • 2.4.7. Solvent Extraction
      • 2.4.7.1. Overview
        • 2.4.7.1.1. CO2-based extraction systems
      • 2.4.7.2. Companies
      • 2.4.7.3. SWOT analysis
    • 2.4.8. Electrochemical extraction
      • 2.4.8.1. Overview
      • 2.4.8.2. Battery-based
      • 2.4.8.3. Intercalation Cells
      • 2.4.8.4. Hybrid Capacitive
      • 2.4.8.5. Modified Electrodes
      • 2.4.8.6. Flow-through Systems
      • 2.4.8.7. Companies
      • 2.4.8.8. SWOT analysis
    • 2.4.9. Chemical precipitation
      • 2.4.9.1. Overview
      • 2.4.9.2. SWOT analysis
    • 2.4.10. Novel hybrid approaches
  • 2.5. Advantages Over Traditional Extraction
    • 2.5.1. Recovery rates
    • 2.5.2. Environmental impact
    • 2.5.3. Processing time
    • 2.5.4. Product purity
  • 2.6. Comparison of DLE Technologies
  • 2.7. Prices
  • 2.8. Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • 2.9. Energy Requirements
  • 2.10. Water Usage
  • 2.11. Recovery Rates
    • 2.11.1. By technology type
    • 2.11.2. By resource type
    • 2.11.3. Optimization potential
  • 2.12. Scalability
  • 2.13. Resource Analysis
    • 2.13.1. Brine Resources
    • 2.13.2. Clay Deposits
    • 2.13.3. Geothermal Waters
    • 2.13.4. Resource Quality Assessment
    • 2.13.5. Extraction Potential

3. GLOBAL MARKET ANALYSIS

  • 3.1. Market Size and Growth
  • 3.2. Regional Market Share
    • 3.2.1. North America
    • 3.2.2. South America
    • 3.2.3. Asia Pacific
    • 3.2.4. Europe
  • 3.3. Cost Analysis
    • 3.3.1. CAPEX comparison
    • 3.3.2. OPEX breakdown
    • 3.3.3. Cost Per Ton Analysis
  • 3.4. Supply-Demand Dynamics
    • 3.4.1. Current supply
    • 3.4.2. Demand projections
  • 3.5. Regulations
  • 3.6. Competitive Landscape

4. COMPANY PROFILES (64 company profiles)

5. APPENDICES

  • 5.1. Glossary of Terms
  • 5.2. List of Abbreviations
  • 5.3. Research Methodology

6. REFERENCES

List of Tables

  • Table 1. Lithium sources and extraction methods
  • Table 2. Global Lithium Production 2023, by country
  • Table 3. Factors Affecting Lithium Production Outlook
  • Table 4. Worldwide Distribution of DLE Projects - Comprehensive Table
  • Table 5. Announced vs Assumed DLE Outlook
  • Table 6. Global Lithium Production and Demand 2020-2024 (ktpa LCE)
  • Table 7. Lithium Production Forecast 2025-2035
  • Table 8. Li Production Contribution by Resource Type (%)
  • Table 9. Li Production Contribution from Brine Extraction (ktpa LCE)
  • Table 10. Lithium Supply vs Demand Outlook 2023-2035 (ktpa LCE)
  • Table 11. Comparison of lithium extraction methods
  • Table 12. Key Characteristics by DLE Method
  • Table 13. Global DLE Market Size 2020-2024
  • Table 14. DLE Market Growth Projections 2024-2035
  • Table 15. DLE Production Forecast by Country (ktpa LCE)
  • Table 16. DLE forecast by extraction technology
  • Table 17. DLE forecast segmented by brine type
  • Table 18. Direct Lithium Extraction Key Market Segments
  • Table 19. Market Drivers for DLE
  • Table 20. Market Challenges in Direct Lithium Extraction
  • Table 21. Alternative Technologies Comparison
  • Table 22. Global lithium extraction projects
  • Table 23. Current and Planned DLE Projects
  • Table 24. Traditional Brine Operations
  • Table 25. Hard Rock Operations
  • Table 26. Conversion Plants
  • Table 27. Business Models by DLE Player Activity
  • Table 28. Business Models by Li Recovery Process
  • Table 29. DLE Investments
  • Table 30. Lithium applications
  • Table 31. Types of lithium brine deposits
  • Table 32. Existing and emerging methods for lithium mining & extraction
  • Table 33. Technology Evolution Timeline and Characteristics
  • Table 34. Types of DLE Technologies
  • Table 35. Brine Evaporation vs Brine DLE Comparison
  • Table 36. Commercial Hard Rock (Spodumene) Projects
  • Table 37. Companies in Sedimentary Lithium Processing
  • Table 38. Ion exchange processes for lithium extraction
  • Table 39. Ion Exchange DLE Projects and Companies
  • Table 40. Companies in ion exchange DLE
  • Table 41. Adsorption vs Absorption
  • Table 42. Adsorption Processes for Lithium Extraction
  • Table 43. Adsorption vs ion exchange
  • Table 44. Types of Sorbent Materials
  • Table 45. Commercial brine evaporation projects
  • Table 46. Comparison of Al/Mn/Ti-based Sorbents
  • Table 47. Adsorption DLE Projects
  • Table 48. Companies in adsorption DLE
  • Table 49. Membrane processes for lithium recovery
  • Table 50. Membrane Materials
  • Table 51. Membrane Filtration Comparison
  • Table 52. Potential-assisted Membrane Technologies
  • Table 53. Companies in membrane technologies for DLE
  • Table 54. Membrane technology developers by Li recovery process
  • Table 55. Solvent extraction processes for lithium extraction
  • Table 56. Companies in solvent extraction DLE
  • Table 57. Electrochemical technologies for lithium recovery
  • Table 58. Companies in electrochemical extraction DLE
  • Table 59. Chemical Precipitation Agents
  • Table 60. Novel Hybrid DLE Approaches
  • Table 61. Cost Comparison: DLE vs Traditional Methods
  • Table 62. Recovery Rate Comparison
  • Table 63. Environmental Impact Comparison
  • Table 64. Processing Time Comparison
  • Table 65. Product Purity Comparison
  • Table 66. Comparison of DLE Technologies
  • Table 67. Lithium Prices 2019-2024 (Battery Grade Li2CO3)
  • Table 68. Energy Consumption Comparison
  • Table 69. Water Usage by Technology Type
  • Table 70. Recovery Rates Comparison
  • Table 71. Recovery Rates By Technology Type
  • Table 72. Recovery Rates By Resource Type
  • Table 73. Global Lithium Resource Distribution,
  • Table 74. Quality Parameters
  • Table 75. Brine Chemistry Comparison
  • Table 76. Resource Quality Matrix
  • Table 77. Extraction Potential by Resource Type
  • Table 78. Global DLE Market Size by Region
  • Table 79. CAPEX Breakdown by Technology
  • Table 80. Cost Comparisons Between Lithium Projects
  • Table 81. OPEX Breakdown Table (USD/tonne LCE)
  • Table 82. Production Cost Comparison (USD/tonne LCE)
  • Table 83. Sustainability Comparisons
  • Table 84. Regulations and incentives related to lithium extraction and mining
  • Table 85. DLE Patent Filing Trends 2015-2024
  • Table 86. Glossary of Terms
  • Table 87. List of Abbreviations

List of Figures

  • Figure 1. Schematic of a conventional lithium extraction process with evaporation ponds
  • Figure 2. Schematic for a direct lithium extraction (DLE) process.
  • Figure 3. Global DLE Market Size 2020-2024
  • Figure 4. DLE Market Growth Projections 2024-2035
  • Figure 5. Market map of DLE technology developers
  • Figure 6. Direct Lithium Extraction Process
  • Figure 7. Direct lithium extraction (DLE) technologies
  • Figure 8. Ion Exchange Process Flow Diagram
  • Figure 9. SWOT analysis for ion exchange technologies
  • Figure 10. SWOT analysis for adsorption DLE
  • Figure 11. Membrane Separation Schematic
  • Figure 12. SWOT analysis for membrane DLE
  • Figure 13. SWOT analysis for solvent extraction DLE
  • Figure 14. SWOT analysis for electrochemical extraction DLE
  • Figure 15. SWOT analysis for chemical precipitation
  • Figure 16. Conventional vs. DLE processes
  • Figure 17. Global DLE Market Size by Region
  • Figure 18. Competitive Position Matrix
  • Figure 19. Flionex-R process
  • Figure 20. Volt Lithium Process