市场调查报告书
商品编码
1471285
共乘市场:按通勤距离、车辆类型、经营模式和服务供应商- 2024-2030 年全球预测Ride Sharing Market by Commuting Distance (Intercity, Intra City), Vehicle Type (Bikes, Cars, Scooters), Business Model, Service Provider - Global Forecast 2024-2030 |
※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。
预计2023年共享旅游市场规模为1,091.2亿美元,预估2024年将达1,229.1亿美元,2030年将达2,590.1亿美元,复合年增长率为13.14%。
共乘是私家车的共享使用,乘客透过按需服务出行,同时将他们与其他人的路线相匹配,或者将多个前往同一方向的乘客聚集在一起。这种协作交通模式利用数位平台(通常是行动应用程式)将寻求乘车的乘客与可用的服务商联繫起来。共乘的成长得益于多种因素,包括智慧型手机普及的提高以及共享经济服务的文化接受度不断提高。城市中心人口密度高且停车位往往不足,特别适合共乘。然而,对乘客和驾驶人安全的担忧、监管不力、共乘驾驶人的就业权利以及对传统计程车服务的影响正在影响共乘的采用。服务提供者正在透过确保协调员的背景调查和培训、更明确地制定招募准则以及促进与城市的合作伙伴关係来应对严峻的挑战,以补充大众交通工具选择。自动驾驶技术有潜力透过降低营运成本和提高安全性来彻底改变市场。人们越来越多地使用资料分析来进行路线优化和需求预测,并专注于扩大电动和混合动力汽车持有以解决环境永续性。智慧城市措施的兴起可能会进一步推动共乘生态系统的发展,创造更互联和高效的城市出行愿景。
主要市场统计 | |
---|---|
基准年[2023] | 1091.2亿美元 |
预测年份 [2024] | 1229.1亿美元 |
预测年份 [2030] | 2590.1亿美元 |
复合年增长率(%) | 13.14% |
通勤距离:城内共乘提供节省成本且舒适的选择
城际共乘针对的是需要不同城市之间交通的客户。这个细分市场的特点是出行距离长,常被选择用于休閒旅行、探亲访友、外出商务会议以及在一个城市生活而在另一个城市工作的人们的通勤。城内共乘主要关註一个城市及其郊区内的交通。此细分市场客户偏好的主要驱动因素包括弹性、速度、成本和可用性。使用者在日常通勤、短途出差以及大众交通工具难以使用的夜间交通时通常会选择共乘。市内乘车共享服务通常提供多种选择,包括节省成本的泳池乘车、提供优质体验的豪华选择以及方便的个人乘车。这些服务广泛采用根据需求和一天中的时间而变化的动态定价模型。与城际交通领域相比,城内交通供应商专注于改善使用者体验的数位创新,努力减少等待时间并提供有竞争力的价格。
车辆类型: 可远距运送多名乘客 汽车共享
自行车共享系统在都市区正在显着增长,交通拥堵和停车问题增加了对替代交通的需求。自行车是一种环保、促进健康的交通途径,特别适合短途旅行和最后一英里的交通。汽车共享平台因其方便、舒适、适合远距和团体出行而受到青睐。汽车共享平台对于那些想要拥有私家车的多功能性而无需支付拥有成本的用户来说很有吸引力。电动Scooter有脚踏式和坐式两种版本,由于灵活且易于使用,在都市区越来越受欢迎。适合短途旅行,让您在繁忙的道路上快速移动。由于价格低廉、停车方便,特别受到年轻人的欢迎。自行车是最环保、最经济的。它们通常因其健康益处和在自行车友善城市的易用性而被选择。汽车为长途旅行和团体旅行提供了最通用、最舒适的交通工具,但价格昂贵,对都市区拥挤影响不大。Scooter在两者之间取得了很好的平衡,可以让您快速轻鬆地进行短距离旅行。
经营模式:提高企业对消费者乘车共享领域的便利性与易用性
共乘市场的 B2B 细分市场针对的是需要为其员工和业务合作伙伴提供交通服务的企业。这可能包括乘车共享平台上的公司帐户,员工可以透过雇主的帐户使用乘车服务。企业更喜欢 B2B 模式,以简化申请、行程追踪和有效管理运输成本。与B2C和P2P相比,B2B注重数量和合约基础的稳定性,透过长期合约提供可预测的需求和潜在的更高盈利。 B2C 领域透过服务提供者提供共乘服务,这些服务商直接服务于个人消费者并提供通常使用私家车的交通服务。由于便利性、价格和可访问性,消费者通常更喜欢 B2C 服务,因为这些服务可以透过行动应用程式按需提供。在P2P模式中,个人车主将自己的汽车出租给其他人,形成了一个去中心化的车辆共用网路。它是最以社区为中心的模式,与传统的乘车共享服务不同,它允许车主将閒置资产收益。 P2P 模型依赖强大的信任社区,并且无需大型中心化工具即可扩展。然而,它们可能面临监管障碍,并需要强大的使用者验证系统来确保安全性和可靠性。
服务提供者:有竞争力的价格和可靠的品质正在推动OEM服务提供者的发展趋势。
OEM(原始设备製造商)是指製造其他公司销售的零件和设备的公司。在乘车共享的背景下,汽车製造商透过合作或推出自己的平台进入服务领域就是这种情况。由于车辆的品牌保证和质量,客户通常倾向于选择OEM提供的共乘产品。这些服务可能提供豪华车型、尖端技术和优质的乘车共享体验。 OEM还可以提供与车辆内建功能和连接解决方案的无缝整合。私人乘车共享公司是独立成立的公司,其唯一目的是提供共享交通服务。这些公司通常不製造车辆,而是透过与车主合作或租赁车辆来提供服务。客户可能更喜欢私人供应商,因为它们方便、易于访问、覆盖范围更大,而且价格往往更具竞争力。
区域洞察
在美洲,特别是在美国和加拿大,共乘服务已广泛融入主要城市的交通网络中。由于强大的技术基础设施、高智慧型手机普及以及年轻人逐渐远离私家车,采用率很高。亚太地区的叫车产业呈现多元化,受到大量城市人口、技术使用不断增加以及不断变化的法规环境的推动。一些亚太国家/地区正在采取积极的扩大策略、付款系统的本地化调整以及食品配送等附加服务的整合以补充共乘服务。受不同经济状况、法规结构和旅行习惯的影响,EMEA(欧洲、中东和非洲)地区的共乘使用呈现出混合模式。欧洲的共乘场景在大都会圈具有强大的吸引力,并且非常注重环境永续性,这推动了电动和混合动力汽车共乘选择的发展。在中东和非洲,共乘服务可满足豪华车辆和日常交通需求,通常可以填补大众交通工具网络的空白。在欧洲、中东和非洲地区,儘管市场成熟度各异,但生产往往专注于确保遵守当地法律、高服务品质和营运效率。
FPNV定位矩阵
FPNV定位矩阵对于评估共乘市场至关重要。我们检视与业务策略和产品满意度相关的关键指标,以对供应商进行全面评估。这种深入的分析使用户能够根据自己的要求做出明智的决策。根据评估,供应商被分为四个成功程度不同的像限:前沿(F)、探路者(P)、利基(N)和重要(V)。
市场占有率分析
市场占有率分析是一种综合工具,可以对乘车共享市场中供应商的现状进行深入而深入的研究。全面比较和分析供应商在整体收益、基本客群和其他关键指标方面的贡献,以便更好地了解公司的绩效及其在争夺市场占有率时面临的挑战。此外,该分析还提供了对该行业竞争特征的宝贵见解,包括在研究基准年观察到的累积、分散主导地位和合併特征等因素。这种详细程度的提高使供应商能够做出更明智的决策并制定有效的策略,从而在市场上获得竞争优势。
1. 市场渗透率:提供有关主要企业所服务的市场的全面资讯。
2. 市场开拓:我们深入研究利润丰厚的新兴市场,并分析其在成熟细分市场的渗透率。
3. 市场多元化:提供有关新产品发布、开拓地区、最新发展和投资的详细资讯。
4.竞争力评估与资讯:对主要企业的市场占有率、策略、产品、认证、监管状况、专利状况、製造能力等进行全面评估。
5. 产品开发与创新:提供对未来技术、研发活动和突破性产品开发的见解。
1. 共乘市场的市场规模与预测是多少?
2.在乘车共享市场的预测期内,有哪些产品、细分市场、应用程式和领域需要考虑投资?
3.共享出行市场的技术趋势和法规结构是什么?
4.共享出行市场主要厂商的市场占有率为何?
5.进入共享出行市场合适的型态或策略手段是什么?
[187 Pages Report] The Ride Sharing Market size was estimated at USD 109.12 billion in 2023 and expected to reach USD 122.91 billion in 2024, at a CAGR 13.14% to reach USD 259.01 billion by 2030.
Ridesharing refers to the shared use of private vehicles in which riders make trips that are either simultaneously matched with others' routes or are facilitated via on-demand services that congregate multiple passengers headed in the same direction. This collaborative transportation mode leverages digital platforms, typically mobile apps, to connect passengers seeking rides with drivers who have empty seats in their cars. The expansion of ride-sharing can be attributed to various factors, including increasing smartphone penetration and a growing cultural acceptance of shared economy services. Urban centers, with their high population density and often inadequate parking facilities, are particularly conducive to ride-sharing. However, the safety of passengers and drivers, concerns over inadequate regulation, employment rights of ride-share drivers, and the impact on traditional taxi services impact their adoption. Service providers are ensuring background checks and training for drivers, establishing clearer employment guidelines, and fostering partnerships with cities to complement public transit options to tackle challenging concerns. Autonomous driving technology bears the potential to revolutionize the market by reducing operational costs and increasing safety. There is a growing opportunity to leverage data analytics for optimizing routes and demand forecasting, as well as a focus on expanding the electric and hybrid vehicle fleets to address environmental sustainability. The rise in smart city initiatives may further facilitate the growth of the ride-sharing ecosystem, creating a more connected and efficient urban mobility landscape.
KEY MARKET STATISTICS | |
---|---|
Base Year [2023] | USD 109.12 billion |
Estimated Year [2024] | USD 122.91 billion |
Forecast Year [2030] | USD 259.01 billion |
CAGR (%) | 13.14% |
Commuting Distance: Cost-saving and comfortable options available for intracity rides
Intercity ride-sharing caters to customers requiring transportation between different cities. This segment is characterized by longer distances and is typically chosen for leisure trips, visiting family and friends, business meetings outside the home city, or commuting for those who live in one city and work in another. Intracity ride-sharing focuses on transportation within a single city and its surrounding suburbs. The key drivers for customer preferences in this segment include flexibility, speed, cost, and availability. Users often choose ride-sharing for daily commutes, short errands, and night-time travel when public transportation may be less available. Intracity ride-sharing services typically offer an array of options, including pooled rides for cost-saving, luxury options for a premium experience, and individual rides for convenience. These services widely adopt dynamic pricing models which can change based on demand and time of day. Compared to the intercity segment, intracity providers are more focused on digital innovations to enhance user experience and strive for shorter wait times and competitive pricing.
Vehicle Type: Potential to transport multiple passengers for longer distances car sharing
Bike-sharing systems have seen substantial growth in urban areas where traffic congestion and parking issues drive the need for alternative transportation. Bicycles serve as an eco-friendly, health-promoting means of transit, particularly suitable for short distances and last-mile connectivity. Car-sharing platforms are preferred for their convenience, comfort, and suitability for longer distances or group travel. They appeal to users who require the versatility of a personal vehicle without the costs of ownership. Motorized scooters, both kick and sit-down variants, are increasingly popular in cities for being nimble and easily accessible. They are favored for short rides and offer a swift option for navigating congested streets. Their low cost and ease of parking make them a favorable choice, especially among younger demographics. Bikes are the most environmentally friendly and cost-effective, often chosen for health benefits and ease of use in bicycle-friendly cities. Cars offer the greatest versatility and comfort for longer journeys or when traveling in a group, though they come with higher costs and are less effective in combating urban congestion. Scooters strike a balance between the two, providing quick and easy transport for short distances.
Business Model: Improved convenience and ease of access of business to consumer ridesharing segments
The B2B segment of the ride-sharing market caters to companies requiring transportation services for their employees or clients. This may include corporate accounts with ride-sharing platforms, where employees can utilize rides on the account of the employer. Companies prefer the B2B model for streamlined billing, ride tracking, and the ability to manage transportation expenses efficiently. Compared to B2C and P2P, B2B focuses on volume and contract-based stability, offering predictable demand and potentially higher profitability through long-term contracts. The B2C segment directly serves the individual consumer, offering rideshares from drivers who are often using their personal vehicles to provide transportation services. Consumers' preference for B2C services is often driven by convenience, price, and ease of access, as these services are available on-demand through mobile applications. In the P2P model, individual car owners rent out their vehicles to others, creating a decentralized network of vehicle sharing. This is the most community-centric model and differs from traditional ride-sharing services by enabling car owners to monetize their idle assets. The P2P model relies on a strong community of trust and can scale without the need for a large centralized fleet. However, it may face regulatory hurdles and require robust user verification systems to ensure safety and reliability.
Service Provider: Inclinations towards OEM service providers due to competitive pricing and reliable quality
Original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) refer to corporations that produce parts and equipment that may be marketed by another company. In the context of ride-sharing, these are automobile manufacturers who have ventured into the service space either through collaborations or by launching their own platforms. Customers often gravitate towards OEM-provided ride-sharing for the brand assurance and quality of vehicles. These services may offer higher-end models and the latest technologies, which can lead to a premium ride-sharing experience. OEMs may also offer seamless integration with their vehicles' built-in features and connectivity solutions. Private ride-sharing companies are businesses independently established with the sole purpose of providing shared transport services. These companies usually do not manufacture vehicles but partner with vehicle owners or lease vehicles to provide their services. Customers may prefer private providers due to the convenience, ease of access, broader service areas, and often more competitive pricing.
Regional Insights
In the Americas, particularly in the United States and Canada, ride-sharing services are extensively integrated into the transportation fabric of major cities. Adoption rates are high due to the robust technological infrastructure, high smartphone penetration, and a shift away from private car ownership among younger demographics. The APAC region's ride-sharing industry is diverse, propelled by massive urban populations, rising technology use, and evolving regulatory environments. Some APAC countries have seen aggressive expansion strategies, local adaptation to payment systems, and the integration of additional services, such as food delivery, to complement their ride-sharing offerings. The EMEA region shows a mixed pattern in terms of ride-sharing usage, influenced by diverse economic conditions, regulatory frameworks, and mobility habits. Europe's ride-sharing scene has significant traction in metropolitan areas, with a strong focus on environmental sustainability, resulting in a push for electric and hybrid ride-sharing options. The Middle East and Africa have a more nascent but rapidly growing market where ride-sharing services cater to a mix of luxury and everyday transport needs, often filling gaps in public transportation networks. The production focus in EMEA tends to be on ensuring compliance with local laws, high service quality, and operational efficiency amidst varying levels of market maturity.
FPNV Positioning Matrix
The FPNV Positioning Matrix is pivotal in evaluating the Ride Sharing Market. It offers a comprehensive assessment of vendors, examining key metrics related to Business Strategy and Product Satisfaction. This in-depth analysis empowers users to make well-informed decisions aligned with their requirements. Based on the evaluation, the vendors are then categorized into four distinct quadrants representing varying levels of success: Forefront (F), Pathfinder (P), Niche (N), or Vital (V).
Market Share Analysis
The Market Share Analysis is a comprehensive tool that provides an insightful and in-depth examination of the current state of vendors in the Ride Sharing Market. By meticulously comparing and analyzing vendor contributions in terms of overall revenue, customer base, and other key metrics, we can offer companies a greater understanding of their performance and the challenges they face when competing for market share. Additionally, this analysis provides valuable insights into the competitive nature of the sector, including factors such as accumulation, fragmentation dominance, and amalgamation traits observed over the base year period studied. With this expanded level of detail, vendors can make more informed decisions and devise effective strategies to gain a competitive edge in the market.
Key Company Profiles
The report delves into recent significant developments in the Ride Sharing Market, highlighting leading vendors and their innovative profiles. These include Beep, Inc., BlaBlaCar, Bolt Technology OU, Cabify Espana S.L.U., Cubic Transportation Systems, Inc., Curb Mobility, LLC, Didi chuxing Technology Co. Ltd., FOD Mobility UK Ltd., GATEWAY DIGITAL, Getaround, Inc., Gettaxi Limited, Grab Holding, Inc., Lime Micromobility, Lyft, Inc., Mobisoft Infotech, Moovit Inc., Ola by ANI Technologies Pvt. Ltd., PT GoTo Gojek Tokopedia Tbk, Quick Ride by iDisha Info Labs Pvt Ltd., Ridecell Inc., SkedGo Pty. Ltd., Trafi Ltd., TRANSDEV Group, Turo Inc., Twogo by Schwarz Mobility Solutions GmbH, Uber Technologies Inc., and Wingz, Inc..
Market Segmentation & Coverage
1. Market Penetration: It presents comprehensive information on the market provided by key players.
2. Market Development: It delves deep into lucrative emerging markets and analyzes the penetration across mature market segments.
3. Market Diversification: It provides detailed information on new product launches, untapped geographic regions, recent developments, and investments.
4. Competitive Assessment & Intelligence: It conducts an exhaustive assessment of market shares, strategies, products, certifications, regulatory approvals, patent landscape, and manufacturing capabilities of the leading players.
5. Product Development & Innovation: It offers intelligent insights on future technologies, R&D activities, and breakthrough product developments.
1. What is the market size and forecast of the Ride Sharing Market?
2. Which products, segments, applications, and areas should one consider investing in over the forecast period in the Ride Sharing Market?
3. What are the technology trends and regulatory frameworks in the Ride Sharing Market?
4. What is the market share of the leading vendors in the Ride Sharing Market?
5. Which modes and strategic moves are suitable for entering the Ride Sharing Market?