![]() |
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1827564
云端存取安全仲介市场(按服务类型、部署方式、组织规模和产业)—2025-2032 年全球预测Cloud Access Security Brokers Market by Service Type, Deployment Model, Organization Size, Industry Vertical - Global Forecast 2025-2032 |
※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。
预计到 2032 年,云端存取安全仲介市场将成长至 698.3 亿美元,复合年增长率为 19.84%。
主要市场统计数据 | |
---|---|
基准年2024年 | 164.1亿美元 |
预计2025年 | 196.4亿美元 |
预测年份:2032年 | 698.3亿美元 |
复合年增长率(%) | 19.84% |
云端存取安全仲介(CASB) 已成为现代安全架构中的关键技术,在用户和云端服务之间提供控制和可见性。云端应用和监管审查力度加大的双重压力推动了 CASB 的采用。本介绍将 CASB 定位为不仅仅是点工具,更是一个战略控制平面,它与身份系统、资料保护框架和威胁检测工作流程集成,以确保在 SaaS、IaaS 和自订 API 之间实现一致的策略执行。
现代 CASB 市场的特点是功能快速融合,并融合了诸如安全存取服务边际(SASE)、零信任网路存取(ZTNA) 和云端多重云端安全控制等互补架构。相关人员优先考虑能够提供强大资料保护控制、情境感知存取策略以及与身分识别提供者和安全资讯平台原生整合的解决方案。这种转变反映了营运需求,即在混合云端和多云环境中减少安全摩擦,同时提高执行力的准确性。
这意味着 CASB 正在从利基网关设备转向支援企业云端管治的可程式策略平台。在评估 CASB 选项时,您应该考虑整合的广度、延迟接受度、资料保护原语以及跨分散式团队和服务模型运行策略的能力。
过去几年,企业在云端安全方面的处理方式发生了翻天覆地的变化,CASB 正处于几个趋势交汇的十字路口。首先,API 驱动型应用程式的快速普及要求企业能够深度保护 API。现代 CASB 不再仅仅关注 Web 代理,而是强调 API 发现、行为分析和运行时保护,以减少资料外洩和 API 滥用。因此,产品蓝图和采购标准也在不断发展,除了传统的基于代理的控制措施外,还优先考虑 API 的可见性和保护。
其次,监管的复杂性和隐私要求推动了对整合执行机制的强大合规控制的需求。跨多个司法管辖区营运的企业需要在公有云和私有云之间实施一致且审核的策略,并期望 CASB 能够提供符合监管义务的策略编配和合规报告。第三,加密和私有云端技术的进步正在将资料保护策略从以边界为中心的防御转变为自适应的、以资料为中心的控制,无论资料位于何处,这些控制都能持续有效。
此外,威胁情势的演变加速了对即时分析和自适应策略响应的需求。 CASB 内建的机器学习主导的威胁防御功能与终端和网路遥测技术协同工作,提供情境感知的干预措施。企业正在寻求符合云端优先策略的方案,同时应对混合部署和本地部署的限制。这些综合性转变要求安全领导者不仅要评估其 CASB 解决方案的当前覆盖范围,还要评估其随着云端架构和威胁向量的不断变化而演进的能力。
美国2025年的关税环境为云端安全供应商及其客户的采购和营运规划带来了额外的复杂性。关税可能会扰乱供应商的供应链,增加硬体和设备成本,并改变本地部署和混合部署的总拥有成本 (TCO) 计算。依赖实体设备或专用硬体加速器实现内联 CASB 功能的架构可能会对采购计划和资本支出产生影响,可能需要製定应急计划并进行架构调整。
除了硬体因素外,关税还可能间接影响供应商的定价策略和合约结构。面对不断上涨的进口成本,供应商可能会调整授权模式,转向基于订阅的云端原生服务,或加快功能向 SaaS 的迁移,以保护客户免受关税波动的影响。对于最终用户而言,这再次强调了评估云端交付的 CASB 方案,并检验与本地投资相比的长期营运成本影响。
在营运方面,关税也会影响全球部署策略。跨国公司必须评估区域采购和部署决策,考虑跨境成本差异,优化财务弹性,同时确保资料驻留、延迟和合规性要求不受影响。采购团队、安全架构师和财务相关人员必须协作,模拟关税敏感度场景,在必要时优先考虑云端原生和软体前向选项,并确保合约灵活性以适应宏观经济政策的变化。
细分层面的动态揭示了不同服务类型、部署方式、组织规模和垂直产业的不同优先级,了解这些差异对于制定有针对性的产品和打入市场策略至关重要。按服务类型划分,随着企业应对高级自动化和恶意 API互动,我们看到重点转向 API 保护和威胁防护,而合规性管理对于寻求审核和策略统一性的管治团队来说仍然至关重要。资料保护仍然是一项基本要求,并且越来越多地透过加密和令牌化策略来实现,这些策略可在云端服务之间实现可可携式且持久的保护措施。
在考虑部署模型时,对于追求可扩展性和降低营运开销的企业来说,云端原生交付显然是更好选择,但当遗留系统或敏感工作负载需要本地管理时,混合架构也同样适用。在云端策略中,私有云端和公有云部署之间的差异会影响整合路径、延迟考虑以及保全行动团队所需的身分和网路互通性。
组织规模进一步影响买家的优先顺序。大型企业寻求全面的功能集、企业级整合以及适用于全球营运的集中式策略编配,而中小企业则优先考虑能够简化部署、可预测定价并限制营运团队的解决方案组件。最后,BFSI、政府、医疗保健、IT 和电信以及零售和电子商务等垂直行业由于其独特的监管、性能和资料保护特性而优先考虑功能。提供行业特定模板、预先映射合规性控制和行业特定远端检测的解决方案在满足垂直行业需求方面具有竞争优势。
区域动态持续影响组织机构采用和运作 CASB 功能的方式,每个地区都呈现出独特的监管、商业和基础设施特征。在美洲,云端应用的日趋成熟以及对资料隐私框架的日益重视,正在推动对能够支援跨国营运的强大合规控制和资料保护功能的需求。该地区的供应商生态系统正优先考虑与成熟的身份提供者和企业安全堆迭集成,以满足大型商业和金融服务客户的需求。
在欧洲、中东和非洲,监管环境更加分散,资料居住、跨境传输规则和区域合规框架需要灵活的部署选项和精细的资料管治控制。提供本地资料处理、详细审核追踪和灵活策略范本的解决方案可以满足这些市场的多样化需求。此外,本地服务供应商和系统整合商在实施和託管服务交付模式中发挥关键作用。
亚太地区正经历云端运算的快速普及,这主要得益于商业和公共部门的数位转型倡议,尤其註重可扩展的云端原生交付模式。该地区的市场需求通常优先考虑效能、本地云端供应商整合和快速实施。在所有地区,与本地云端平台的互通性、语言和政策在地化以及与本地系统整合商的伙伴关係仍然是决定成功采用和持续采用的关键因素。
市场上的现有和新兴供应商正透过深度平台整合、专用资料保护原语以及减少客户营运摩擦的託管服务来脱颖而出。领先的供应商正在大力投资 API安全功能,将行为分析功能整合到其侦测引擎中,并扩展与身分和终端平台的原生整合。这些投资反映了市场普遍的预期,即 CASB 将充当编配层,而不是孤立的执行点。
同时,致力于满足即时标记化、隐私保护分析和行业特定合规自动化等细分需求的创新公司也日益受到关注。这些公司通常优先考虑快速部署、低延迟部署以及与知名云端服务供应商的承包整合。策略伙伴关係和通路生态系统在供应商竞争力中发挥重要作用,使公司能够将 CASB 功能与更广泛的安全和云端转型服务捆绑在一起。
对于买家而言,供应商的选择越来越受到成熟整合成功案例、营运支援和透明技术蓝图的驱动。能够清楚展示事件侦测、策略执行时间和营运成本方面显着改善的供应商,更有可能获得采购委员会和安全营运中心的青睐,他们希望将安全工具与业务发展速度保持一致。
行业领导者应优先考虑几个可行的步骤,使其安全策略与不断变化的云端风险和商业性现实保持一致。首先,采取以资料为中心的安全态势,强调加密和令牌化作为跨平台和跨辖区资料迁移的基础控制措施。这可以减少对薄弱边界假设的依赖,并提供持久的保护,从而简化跨境合规工作。
第二,加速对云端原生 CASB 的评估,并推荐模组化、API 优先的解决方案,以便与身分识别提供者、终端遥测来源和 SIEM 平台无缝整合。这可以减少部署阻力,并加快检测和回应用例的实现。第三,在供应商合约中纳入资费敏感度和采购弹性,以缓解供应链成本衝击。
第四,投资跨职能管治论坛,将安全、法律、采购和云端架构师聚集在一起,确保政策框架可执行并与业务目标保持一致。第五,在高价值云环境中试行高阶威胁防御和行为分析用例,以检验营运改进并完善调整实践,然后再广泛推广。将以数据为中心的控制与策略采购和跨职能管治相结合,可以帮助领导者满怀信心地推进云端优先倡议,并降低风险。
本研究采用混合方法,整合了初步访谈、供应商技术文件和二手公开讯息,从而对 CASB 格局形成严谨而均衡的视角。主要资讯包括与多个行业的安全架构师、云端工程负责人和采购专家进行结构化访谈,以了解营运优先事项、整合挑战和部署偏好。供应商简报和产品白皮书则提供了蓝图方向、功能和整合模型的见解。
我们利用二级资讯来源来检验行业趋势、监管发展和技术关联性,并专注于将声明与可观察的产品行为和案例研究进行配对。定性研究结果与技术演示相匹配,并在可能的情况下,与从业人员描述的匿名实施结果相匹配。本调查方法强调假设的透明度、基于访谈资料的合理推论以及对供应商声明的保守解读,以确保研究结果的实际相关性和操作适用性。
这种方法的局限性包括供应商功能命名的多样性、产品开发的快速发展以及需要对高度战术性的采购决策进行持续检验。为了缓解这些问题,建议着重于持久功能和架构契合度,而不是暂时的功能差距。
随着云端采用趋势的深化和威胁行为者的不断演变,CASB 将继续成为企业策略的核心,用于维护敏感资料的控制并在异质云端环境中实施一致的策略。该技术的作用正在从执行网关扩展到与身分、端点和分析平台整合的可程式策略层。青睐以资料为中心的管理、API 感知保护和灵活部署模式的组织将能够更好地管理监管复杂性和营运规模。
领导者必须在快速采用云端技术与严谨的管治之间取得平衡,同时选择既符合其技术架构又符合组织能力的解决方案。云端原生功能与本地部署限制之间的相互作用将继续驱动采购决策,而市场将奖励那些提供可组合、可整合且营运高效的产品的供应商。在这种环境下,严格的评估标准、跨职能管治以及对持久资料保护的关注,是实现安全永续云端转型的最可靠途径。
The Cloud Access Security Brokers Market is projected to grow by USD 69.83 billion at a CAGR of 19.84% by 2032.
KEY MARKET STATISTICS | |
---|---|
Base Year [2024] | USD 16.41 billion |
Estimated Year [2025] | USD 19.64 billion |
Forecast Year [2032] | USD 69.83 billion |
CAGR (%) | 19.84% |
Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASBs) have emerged as a linchpin technology in modern security architectures, mediating control and visibility between users and cloud services. Organizations are increasingly adopting CASB capabilities to address the twin pressures of pervasive cloud consumption and amplified regulatory scrutiny. This introduction frames CASBs not simply as a point tool but as a strategic control plane that integrates with identity systems, data protection frameworks, and threat detection workflows to deliver consistent policy enforcement across SaaS, IaaS, and custom APIs.
The contemporary CASB market is defined by rapid functional convergence with complementary architectures such as secure access service edge (SASE), zero trust network access (ZTNA), and cloud-native security controls. Stakeholders are prioritizing solutions that offer strong data protection controls, context-aware access policies, and native integrations with identity providers and security information platforms. This shift reflects an operational imperative to reduce security friction while increasing enforcement fidelity across hybrid and multi-cloud estates.
In short, CASBs are transitioning from niche gateway appliances toward programmable policy platforms that underpin enterprise cloud governance. The introduction here sets expectations for leaders: evaluating CASB options must account for integration breadth, latency tolerances, data protection primitives, and the ability to operationalize policy across dispersed teams and service models.
The last several years have witnessed transformative shifts in how organizations approach cloud security, with CASBs positioned at the intersection of several converging trends. First, the rapid proliferation of API-driven applications has driven demand for deep API protection capabilities. Rather than focusing solely on web proxies, modern CASBs now emphasize API discovery, behavior analytics, and runtime protection to mitigate data exfiltration and API misuse. Consequently, product roadmaps and procurement criteria have evolved to prioritize API visibility and protection alongside classic proxy-based controls.
Second, regulatory complexity and privacy mandates have increased the need for robust compliance management integrated into enforcement mechanisms. Enterprises operating across multinational jurisdictions require consistent, auditable policy enforcement across public and private clouds, and they expect CASBs to provide policy orchestration paired with compliance reporting that maps to regulatory obligations. Third, advances in encryption and tokenization technologies have shifted data protection strategies from perimeter-focused prevention toward adaptive data-centric controls that persist regardless of where data resides.
Additionally, threat landscapes have accelerated the need for real-time analytics and adaptive policy responses. Machine learning-driven threat protection capabilities within CASBs now operate in concert with endpoint and network telemetry to deliver contextually aware interventions. Finally, deployment flexibility has become a decisive factor: organizations seek options that align with cloud-first strategies while accommodating hybrid and on-premises constraints. Taken together, these shifts compel security leaders to evaluate CASB solutions not only for present coverage but for their ability to evolve as cloud architectures and threat vectors continue to change.
The tariff environment introduced in 2025 in the United States has added an additional layer of complexity to procurement and operational planning for cloud security vendors and their customers. Tariffs can disrupt vendor supply chains, increase hardware and appliance costs, and alter total cost of ownership calculations for on-premises and hybrid deployments. Organizations that rely on physical appliances or specialized hardware accelerators for inline CASB functions may find procurement timelines and capital expenditures affected, requiring contingency planning and potential architecture adjustments.
Beyond hardware considerations, tariffs can indirectly influence vendor pricing strategies and contractual structures. Vendors facing increased import costs may adjust licensing models, pivot toward subscription-based cloud-native services, or accelerate migration of functionality to software-as-a-service delivery to insulate customers from tariff-driven fluctuations. For end users, this means a renewed emphasis on evaluating cloud-delivered CASB options and validating long-term operational expenditure implications relative to on-premises investments.
Operationally, tariffs also affect global deployment strategies. Multinational organizations must assess regional procurement and deployment decisions in light of cross-border cost differentials, ensuring that data residency, latency, and compliance requirements remain intact while optimizing for fiscal resilience. Procurement teams, security architects, and finance stakeholders should collaborate to model tariff sensitivity scenarios, prioritize cloud-native and software-forward options where appropriate, and ensure contractual flexibility to adapt to evolving macroeconomic policies.
Segment-level dynamics reveal differentiated priorities across service types, deployment models, organization sizes, and industry verticals, and understanding these distinctions is essential for crafting targeted product and go-to-market strategies. For service type, emphasis has shifted toward API Protection and Threat Protection as enterprises contend with sophisticated automation and hostile API interactions, while Compliance Management remains critical for governance teams seeking auditability and policy uniformity. Data Protection continues to be a foundational requirement and is increasingly instantiated through Encryption and Tokenization strategies that enable portable, persistent safeguards across cloud services.
When considering deployment model, cloud-native delivery is the clear preference for organizations seeking scalability and reduced operational overhead, yet hybrid architectures persist where legacy systems and sensitive workloads necessitate on-premises control. Within cloud strategies, distinctions between Private Cloud and Public Cloud deployments influence integration paths, latency considerations, and the nature of identity and network interoperability required by security operations teams.
Organization size further influences buyer priorities: Large Enterprises demand comprehensive feature sets, enterprise-grade integrations, and centralized policy orchestration that can be applied across global estates, whereas Small and Medium Enterprises prioritize simplified deployment, predictable pricing, and solution components that map to constrained operational teams. Finally, industry verticals such as BFSI, Government, Healthcare, IT and Telecom, and Retail and Ecommerce present distinct regulatory, performance, and data protection profiles that drive feature prioritization. Solutions that offer verticalized templates, pre-mapped compliance controls, and industry-specific telemetry will have a competitive edge in meeting sectoral requirements.
Regional dynamics continue to shape how organizations adopt and operationalize CASB capabilities, with each geography presenting unique regulatory, commercial, and infrastructure characteristics. In the Americas, maturity in cloud adoption and a strong focus on data privacy frameworks have driven demand for robust compliance management and data protection features that can be tailored to multinational operations. The vendor ecosystem in this region emphasizes integration with established identity providers and enterprise security stacks to meet the demands of large commercial and financial services customers.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a more fragmented regulatory landscape, where data residency, cross-border transfer rules, and regional compliance frameworks necessitate flexible deployment options and granular data governance controls. Solutions that offer local data processing, detailed audit trails, and adaptable policy templates are positioned to meet the diverse requirements across these markets. In addition, regional service providers and system integrators play a significant role in implementation and managed service delivery models.
Asia-Pacific exhibits rapid cloud adoption driven by digital transformation initiatives across commercial and public sectors, with special emphasis on scalable, cloud-native delivery models. Market needs here often prioritize performance, regional cloud provider integrations, and fast time-to-value implementations. Across all regions, interoperability with local cloud platforms, language and policy localization, and partnerships with regional systems integrators remain key determinants of successful deployments and sustained adoption.
Market incumbents and emerging vendors are differentiating through a mix of deep platform integrations, specialized data protection primitives, and managed service offerings that reduce operational friction for customers. Leading vendors are investing heavily in API security capabilities, embedding behavior analytics into their detection engines, and broadening native integrations with identity and endpoint platforms. These investments reflect a broader market expectation that CASBs will act as orchestration layers rather than isolated enforcement points.
At the same time, a cohort of focused innovators is gaining traction by addressing niche needs such as real-time tokenization, privacy-preserving analytics, and vertical-specific compliance automation. These companies often prioritize rapid deployment, low-latency enforcement, and turnkey integrations with prominent cloud service providers. Strategic partnerships and channel ecosystems play an outsized role in vendor competitiveness, enabling firms to bundle CASB capabilities with broader security and cloud transformation services.
For buyers, vendor selection increasingly hinges on demonstrated integration outcomes, operational support offerings, and the ability to provide transparent technical roadmaps. Vendors that can articulate measurable improvements to incident detection, policy enforcement times, and operational overhead will find stronger resonance with procurement committees and security operations centers seeking to align security tooling with business velocity.
Industry leaders should prioritize several actionable moves to align security strategy with evolving cloud risks and commercial realities. First, adopt a data-centric security posture that emphasizes encryption and tokenization as foundational controls that travel with data across platforms and jurisdictions. This reduces reliance on brittle perimeter assumptions and delivers persistent protections that simplify cross-border compliance efforts.
Second, accelerate the evaluation of cloud-native CASB offerings and favor modular, API-first solutions that integrate cleanly with identity providers, endpoint telemetry sources, and SIEM platforms. This reduces deployment friction and enables faster realization of detection and response use cases. Third, incorporate tariff sensitivity and procurement flexibility into vendor contracts to mitigate supply chain cost shocks; prioritize subscription and cloud-delivered models where appropriate to preserve operational predictability.
Fourth, invest in cross-functional governance forums that bring together security, legal, procurement, and cloud architects to ensure policy frameworks are enforceable and aligned with business objectives. Fifth, pilot advanced threat protection and behavioral analytics use cases in high-value cloud environments to validate operational improvements and refine tuning practices before wider rollout. By combining data-centric controls with strategic procurement and cross-functional governance, leaders can reduce risk while enabling cloud-first initiatives to proceed with confidence.
This research applies a mixed-methods approach that synthesizes primary interviews, vendor technical documentation, and secondary public sources to create a rigorous and balanced view of the CASB landscape. Primary inputs included structured interviews with security architects, cloud engineering leads, and procurement specialists across multiple industries to capture operational priorities, integration challenges, and deployment preferences. Vendor briefings and product whitepapers provided insight into roadmap direction, feature capabilities, and integration models.
Secondary sources were used to validate industry trends, regulatory developments, and technology adjacencies, with attention paid to cross-referencing claims against observable product behavior and implementation case studies. Qualitative findings were triangulated with technical demonstrations and where possible with anonymized implementation outcomes described by practitioners. The methodology emphasizes transparency of assumptions, defensible inferences from interview data, and conservative interpretation of vendor-forward claims to ensure practical relevance and operational applicability.
Limitations of the approach include variability in vendor feature nomenclature and the rapid pace of product development, which necessitates ongoing verification for highly tactical procurement decisions. To mitigate this, recommendations focus on durable capabilities and architectural fit rather than transient feature differentials.
As cloud adoption trends deepen and threat actors evolve, CASBs will remain central to enterprise strategies for preserving control over sensitive data and enforcing consistent policy across heterogeneous cloud environments. The technology's role is expanding from enforcement gateways to programmable policy layers that integrate with identity, endpoint, and analytics platforms. Organizations that orient toward data-centric controls, API-aware protections, and flexible deployment models will be better positioned to manage regulatory complexity and operational scale.
Leaders must balance rapid cloud adoption with disciplined governance, selecting solutions that align with both technical architecture and organizational capacity. The interplay between cloud-native capabilities and on-premises constraints will continue to shape procurement decisions, and the market will reward vendors that deliver composable, integrable, and operationally efficient offerings. In this context, rigorous evaluation criteria, cross-functional governance, and an emphasis on persistent data protection provide the most reliable path to secure and sustainable cloud transformation.