压力控制设备市场（按阀门类型、驱动类型、材料类型、操作模式和终端产业）—2025-2032 年全球预测

预计到 2032 年压力控制设备市场将成长至 130.5 亿美元，复合年增长率为 6.48%。

主要市场统计数据
基准年2024年	78.9亿美元
预计2025年	84.1亿美元
预测年份：2032年	130.5亿美元
复合年增长率（%）	6.48%

压力控制设备的策略采用：基本驱动因素、监管压力、技术进步和相关人员的优先事项影响战术性决策

压力控制设备产业格局处于工程精度、法律规范和不断变化的行业需求的交汇点，要求领导者协调预期绩效与营运弹性。驱动技术、材料工程和数位监控领域的最新进展正在扩展阀门及相关控制硬体的功能范围，同时，来自永续性要求和资本约束的压力也促使企业不断重新思考采购重点。在此背景下，经营团队必须在短期营运连续性与产品现代化和服务能力扩展的长期投资之间取得平衡。

对于寻求永续竞争优势的组织来说，从传统设计转向更模组化、支援感测器的配置已不再是可行的选择。采购团队越来越关註生命週期成本、可维护性以及与工厂级自动化的集成，这迫使製造商提供更清晰的整体价值提案。因此，董事会和工厂级策略讨论通常会考虑在地采购、售后支援框架以及数位服务在减少停机时间和改善预测性维护结果方面的作用。

数位化变革性转变，再形成设计、采购、合规和售后服务

一场变革正在重新定义压力控制设备的设计、製造和支援方式，数位化是变革的核心催化剂。边缘和云端监控技术，结合先进的诊断和分析技术，正在实现远端状态评估和更复杂的预防性保养方法。同时，积层製造以及材料科学与零件设计的紧密整合正在推动性能的持续提升，并缩短复杂零件的前置作业时间。

供应链重组和地缘政治现实也迫使企业重新评估筹资策略和库存管理。排放气体、化学品处理和製程安全方面的法规日益严格，目标商标产品製造商展示合规设计和更佳的可追溯性。此外，人们对循环利用和材料再利用的兴趣日益浓厚，也迫使业界考虑生命週期影响，鼓励采用更高等级的合金，并在可行的情况下实施再製造计划。这些综合转变需要研发、营运和商业团队的协调回应，将技术进步转化为实际的营运改善。

关税对整个压力控制设备价值链的采购、筹资策略、供应商资格和营运连续性的累积影响

2025年美国关税对整个压力控制设备生态系统的供应链架构、筹资策略和零件采购决策产生了多方面的影响。关税造成的成本差异促使买家和供应商重新评估其供应商组合，探索近岸外包选项，并重新设计筹资策略，以维持利润率和供应。因此，采购纪律变得更加细化，采购订单反映基于原产地的成本组成，前置作业时间也得以延长，以减轻下游中断的影响。

除了直接的成本影响外，关税也改变了製造商和最终用户之间的谈判动态和合约结构。企业寻求透过合约保护来应对投入成本波动，有些供应商则寻求合格其他上游供应商的资格，以降低自身风险。在营运方面，维护规划人员和资产所有者更加重视标准化和零件通用，以降低产品过时的风险并简化库存管理。这些调整反映了更广泛的策略方向转变，即除了传统的价格和绩效指标外，供应链的弹性和可预测的服务水准也成为优先事项。

整合阀门类型、驱动方式、材料属性、操作模式和复杂的终端产业要求的关键细分洞察指南产品策略

细分市场动态揭示了基于功能需求、驱动方式选择、材料特性、操作模式和最终用途产业需求的产品开发和商业化清晰路径。就阀门类型而言，球阀、止回阀、隔膜阀、闸阀和截止阀之间的差异导致在密封性能、流量控制精细度和维护便捷性方面的设计权衡，这要求製造商相应地调整测试通讯协定和备件策略。电动、液压、手动和气动驱动各有其独特的介面、可靠性和电力采购，从而影响产品构造和长期服务交付。

合金、碳钢和不銹钢的成本、耐腐蚀性和可加工性各不相同，必须与特定应用的暴露和监管要求相协调。操作模式（自动或手动）会影响给定组件中包含的嵌入式电子设备、远端控制和诊断功能的程度，而自动化解决方案需要更严格的网路安全和整合测试。化学加工领域的客户（包括石化和特种化学品）优先考虑化学相容性和密封性；下游、中游和上游环境中的石油和天然气运营商要求高压完整性和经过验证的现场可修復性；製药公司期望可灭菌和检验的组件；核能、可再生和火电领域的发电利益相关人员优先考虑污水、合规性和生命週期可追溯性合规性和生命性能源处理能力；这些相交的细分向量为市场定位、售后服务设计和研发优先排序提供了资讯。

重点关注全球主要地区的需求驱动因素、监管格局、製造地和服务生态系统的差异

区域环境对需求驱动因素、监管限制和竞争策略的影响差异巨大，需要量身定制的商业性和营运方案。在美洲，重点往往放在生命週期成本优化和售后服务上，相关人员优先考虑响应迅速的现场支援和本地库存，以最大限度地减少停机时间。相较之下，欧洲、中东和非洲的管理体制和能源转型重点各不相同。合规文件、永续性以及对脱碳计画的支持通常是采购决策的决定性因素。在亚太地区，快速的工业扩张、大规模的基础设施投资以及多样化的本地製造能力，在前置作业时间、价格和客製化选项方面引发了激烈的竞争。

这些区域差异会影响製造商在何处设立生产和服务设施、如何配置技术支援网路以及他们寻求的伙伴关係模式。例如，寻求在美洲进一步渗透的供应商通常强调经销伙伴和授权维修中心，而在欧洲、中东和非洲取得成功通常需要可验证的合规性和生命週期文件。在亚太地区，灵活的製造地以及与关键最终用户共同製定规范的能力通常是扩大业务的先决条件。了解这些地理差异对于有效的资本配置、设计库存策略和组建区域商务团队至关重要。

来自主要企业的竞争考察，揭示他们如何结合产品平台、售后服务、数位能力和伙伴关係关係来定义竞争优势和客户维繫

压力控制设备领域的竞争定位日益不仅取决于组件成本，还取决于产品广度、数位化能力、售后市场深度和策略伙伴关係等因素。领先的公司正在投资模组化平台，以便为各种应用提供灵活的配置，同时缩短客製化前置作业时间。同时，提供强大售后市场计划（包括认证维修、备件销售、基于状态的维护包和培训服务）的公司正在从其客户群中获得更高的终身价值。这些售后市场优势也为资料收集创造了机会，可以为产品开发和服务优化工作提供资讯。

合作与伙伴关係模式也在不断发展，阀门製造商、自动化供应商和系统整合商之间的联盟越来越普遍，旨在提供承包解决方案。策略性收购仍然是补充内部能力的途径之一，尤其是在需要利基技术或区域服务网络的情况下。此外，随着越来越多的客户期望整合诊断功能和可预测的服务等级协议，在数位分析和远端支援方面的领先地位已成为支撑高端定位的差异化因素。那些拥有安全供应链、透明合规实践和可验证创新蓝图的公司往往在大型工业买家中享有更高的商业性信誉。

向产业领导者提供可行的建议，以增强弹性、加速产品差异化、实现服务收益并建立策略伙伴关係，确保持久优势

产业领导者应优先考虑一系列切实可行的倡议，以增强韧性、加速差异化，并在整个产品生命週期中创造永续的价值流。首先，尽可能投资模组化设计和标准化，以缩短前置作业时间并简化备件管理，同时保持满足特定应用需求的能力。其次，透过正式建立授权维修网络、扩大零件供给能力，使其更贴近客户现场，以及将预测性维护服务提案，将服务数据转化为运作保障，从而强化售后市场主张。这些措施将提高客户维繫并产生经常性收益。

第三，我们将追求供应链多元化和近岸运营，以降低关税和物流风险。第四，我们将加快将感测器和安全连接整合到新产品中，并将其与分析产品结合，为资产所有者提供切实可行的洞察。最后，我们将与自动化专家和系统整合建立伙伴关係生态系统，提供满足复杂产业规范并缩短采购週期的更高价值的承包解决方案。这些综合策略可以带来立竿见影的营运效益，并建立持久的竞争优势。

整合了主要专家研究、次要技术检验、三角测量和情境分析的强大调查方法可确保分析的准确性和情境相关性。

调查方法结合了系统性的一手资料研究、专家指导、严格的二手资料整合以及反覆检验，以确保分析的完整性。主要方法包括对终端行业的营运主管、采购经理、设计工程师和售后市场专业人士进行结构化访谈，以掌握关于规格驱动因素、服务期望和采购限制的第一手观点。这些定性输入用于将技术性能属性具体化，并揭示影响供应商选择和生命週期管理决策的现实限制因素。

二次研究包括深入审查技术标准、监管指南、供应商技术文献和公开文件，以检验有关材料、测试通讯协定、合规实践和记录性能的声明。我们运用跨资讯来源资料三角检验，并透过交叉检验来协调差异并增强结论的稳健性。调查方法还结合了情境分析，以探索潜在的供应链和监管影响，以及对采购和营运规划的影响。这种多层次的方法确保我们的研究结果既能反映营运现实，又能反映推动设备选择和服务设计的技术细节。

结论性综合报告重申了策略重点、风险缓解措施、生命週期槓桿以及引领不断发展的压力控制设备产业的领导要求

总体而言，压力控制设备领域正在加速的技术整合、不断变化的监管要求以及策略性供应链重组再形成，这给相关人员带来了风险和机会。那些将产品开发与最终用户业务重点相结合、投资售后市场能力并采用弹性筹资策略的开发商，将更有能力获得长期价值。同时，资产拥有方要求在合规性、生命週期成本和服务准备方面保持透明度，这可能会促使供应商提高效能和文件标准。

展望未来，最有效的策略应在短期业务永续营运与模组化、数位化服务和在地化支援网路的投资之间取得平衡。透过强调标准化平台、强大的售后服务、安全的连接性和灵活的采购，企业可以降低停机风险，改善整体生命週期成果，并打造可防御的差异化优势。这些结论应指南领导阶层就资本配置、伙伴关係重点以及研发和服务创新重点进行讨论。

目录

第一章：前言

第二章调查方法

第三章执行摘要

第四章 市场概况

第五章 市场洞察

• 整合支援物联网的传感器，用于即时监测油气管道压力
• 采用数位双胞胎模拟预测压力系统性能及维护需求
• 工业设备用耐腐蚀自诊断智慧阀门的开发
• 利用人工智慧预测分析优化化学过程中的控制迴路效率
• 引入无线压力变送器以降低远端监控应用中的安装成本
• 炼油厂改用低排放气压控制器以符合新的环境法规
• 区块链整合可确保全球压力控制操作中校准记录的安全保存
• 客製化模组化压力调节器平台，支援製造业的快速配置变化
• 能源采集设备的出现为危险区域的自主压力测量节点供电

第六章：2025年美国关税的累积影响

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

第八章压力控制设备市场（依阀门类型）

• 球阀
• 止回阀
• 隔膜阀
• 闸阀
• 截止阀

第九章压力控制设备市场（依营运类型）

• 电
• 油压
• 手动的
• 气压

第 10 章压力控制设备市场（依材料类型）

• 合金钢
• 碳钢
• 不銹钢

第十一章压力控制设备市场（依营运模式）

• 自动的
• 手动的

第十二章压力控制设备市场终端产业

• 化学处理
  • 石化
  • 特种化学品
• 石油和天然气
  • 下游
  • 中产阶级
  • 上游
• 製药
• 发电
  • 核
  • 可再生
  • 热感的
• 水和污水处理

第十三章压力控制设备市场（按地区）

• 美洲
  • 北美洲
  • 拉丁美洲
• 欧洲、中东和非洲
  • 欧洲
  • 中东
  • 非洲
• 亚太地区

第十四章压力控制设备市场（依类别）

• ASEAN
• GCC
• EU
• BRICS
• G7
• NATO

第十五章 压力控制设备市场（依国家）

• 美国
• 加拿大
• 墨西哥
• 巴西
• 英国
• 德国
• 法国
• 俄罗斯
• 义大利
• 西班牙
• 中国
• 印度
• 日本
• 澳洲
• 韩国

第十六章竞争格局

• 2024年市占率分析
• 2024年FPNV定位矩阵
• 竞争分析
  • Emerson Electric Co.
  • Flowserve Corporation
  • Schlumberger Limited
  • ABB Ltd
  • Honeywell International Inc.
  • Parker-Hannifin Corporation
  • Baker Hughes Company
  • Spirax-Sarco Engineering plc
  • Yokogawa Electric Corporation
  • Siemens AG

The Pressure Control Equipment Market is projected to grow by USD 13.05 billion at a CAGR of 6.48% by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024]	USD 7.89 billion
Estimated Year [2025]	USD 8.41 billion
Forecast Year [2032]	USD 13.05 billion
CAGR (%)	6.48%

Strategic introduction to pressure control equipment framing fundamental drivers, regulatory pressures, technological advances, and stakeholder priorities shaping tactical decisions

The pressure control equipment landscape sits at the intersection of engineering precision, regulatory oversight, and evolving industrial demand, requiring leaders to reconcile performance expectations with operational resilience. Recent advances in actuation technologies, materials engineering, and digital monitoring have expanded the functional envelope of valves and related control hardware, while parallel pressures from sustainability mandates and capital discipline continue to reframe procurement priorities. Against this backdrop, executives must balance short-term operational continuity with longer-term investment in product modernization and service capability expansion.

Transitioning from legacy designs to more modular, sensor-enabled configurations is no longer optional for organizations seeking durable competitive advantage. Procurement teams are increasingly focused on lifecycle cost, maintainability, and integration with plant-level automation, compelling manufacturers to present clearer total value propositions. Consequently, strategy discussions at the board and plant level now routinely include considerations about local sourcing, aftermarket support frameworks, and the role of digital services in reducing downtime and improving predictive maintenance outcomes

Transformative shifts reshaping design, sourcing, compliance, and aftersales support driven by digitalization, materials innovation, and evolving regulatory expectations

Transformative shifts are redefining how pressure control equipment is designed, manufactured, and supported, with digitalization serving as a central catalyst for change. Edge and cloud-enabled monitoring, combined with advanced diagnostics and analytics, are enabling remote condition assessment and more sophisticated preventive maintenance approaches. At the same time, additive manufacturing and tighter integration between material science and component design are driving incremental performance gains while shortening lead times for complex parts.

Supply chain reconfiguration and geopolitical realities are also prompting organizations to reassess sourcing strategies and inventory management. Regulatory tightening around emissions, chemical handling, and process safety is pushing original equipment providers to demonstrate compliance-ready designs and improved traceability. Moreover, increased focus on circularity and materials reuse is pressuring the industry to consider lifecycle implications, encouraging the adoption of higher-grade alloys and refurbishing programs where feasible. Taken together, these shifts demand a coordinated response across R&D, operations, and commercial teams to translate technical advances into tangible operational improvements

Cumulative implications of tariff actions on procurement, sourcing strategies, supplier qualification, and operational continuity across the pressure control equipment value chain

United States tariff actions in 2025 have exerted multifaceted influence on supply chain architecture, procurement strategies, and component sourcing decisions across the pressure control equipment ecosystem. Tariff-imposed cost differentials have incentivized buyers and suppliers to re-evaluate supplier portfolios, consider nearshoring options, and redesign sourcing strategies to preserve margin and maintain availability. As a result, purchasing disciplines have become more granular, with purchase orders increasingly reflecting origin-based cost components and longer lead-time buffers to mitigate downstream disruption.

Beyond direct cost implications, tariffs have altered negotiation dynamics and contract structures between manufacturers and end users. Firms have sought contractual protections around input-cost fluctuations, while some suppliers have pursued qualification of alternative upstream vendors to reduce exposure. In operational terms, maintenance planners and asset owners have placed higher emphasis on standardization and parts commonality to lower the risk of obsolescence and to simplify inventory management. These adaptations reflect a broader strategic reorientation where supply chain resilience and predictable service levels are prioritized alongside traditional price and performance metrics

Key segmentation insights synthesizing valve typologies, actuation modalities, material attributes, operational modes, and complex end industry requirements to guide product strategy

Segment-level dynamics reveal distinct pathways for product development and commercialization based on functional requirements, actuation choices, material characteristics, operational modes, and end-use industry needs. For valve type, differences between ball valve, check valve, diaphragm valve, gate valve, and globe valve inform design trade-offs in sealing performance, flow control granularity, and maintenance access, prompting manufacturers to tailor testing protocols and spare-parts strategies accordingly. Meanwhile, actuation type drives integration and control considerations: electric, hydraulic, manual, and pneumatic actuation each bring unique interface, reliability, and power-sourcing implications that influence both product architecture and long-term service offerings.

Material selection is another central axis of differentiation, where alloy steel, carbon steel, and stainless steel present divergent cost, corrosion resistance, and machinability profiles that must be reconciled with application-specific exposure and regulatory requirements. Operation mode-automatic versus manual-influences the degree of embedded electronics, remote-operability, and diagnostic functionality included in a given assembly, with automatic solutions demanding more rigorous cybersecurity and integration testing. Finally, end industry requirements create layered specification demands: chemical processing customers, including petrochemical and specialty chemical segments, emphasize chemical compatibility and leak-tightness; oil and gas operators in downstream, midstream, and upstream environments require high-pressure integrity and proven field reparability; pharmaceutical companies expect sterilizable, validated components; power generation stakeholders in nuclear, renewable, and thermal domains prioritize reliability, compliance, and lifecycle traceability; and water and wastewater treatment authorities focus on durability and ease of maintenance. These intersecting segmentation vectors inform go-to-market positioning, aftermarket service design, and R&D prioritization

Key regional insights illustrating differentiated demand drivers, regulatory landscapes, manufacturing footprints, and service ecosystems across major global territories

Regional contexts shape demand drivers, regulatory constraints, and competitive tactics in materially different ways, requiring tailored commercial and operational approaches. In the Americas, emphasis tends to fall on lifecycle cost optimization and aftermarket services, with stakeholders prioritizing rapid field support and local stocking to minimize downtime. By contrast, Europe, Middle East & Africa present a mosaic of regulatory regimes and energy transition priorities; here, compliance documentation, sustainability performance, and support for decarbonization initiatives are frequently decisive factors in procurement decisions. In Asia-Pacific, rapid industrial expansion, large-scale infrastructure investment, and diverse local manufacturing capabilities create intense competition on lead times, price, and customization options.

These regional distinctions affect where manufacturers locate production and service hubs, how they staff technical support networks, and what partnership models they pursue. For example, providers seeking deeper penetration in the Americas often emphasize distribution partnerships and certified repair centers, while success in Europe, Middle East & Africa commonly requires demonstrable compliance and lifecycle documentation. In Asia-Pacific, flexible manufacturing footprints and the ability to co-develop specifications with major end users are often prerequisites for scaling operations. Understanding these geographic nuances is essential for allocating capital effectively, designing inventory strategies, and structuring regional commercial teams

Key company insights revealing how product platforms, aftermarket services, digital capabilities, and partnerships combine to define competitive advantage and customer retention

Competitive positioning within the pressure control equipment arena is increasingly defined by a blend of product breadth, digital capability, aftermarket density, and strategic partnerships rather than by component cost alone. Leading firms are investing in modular platforms that reduce customization lead time while enabling configuration flexibility for different applications. At the same time, companies offering robust aftermarket programs-spanning certified repairs, spare parts distribution, condition-based maintenance packages, and training services-are capturing higher lifetime value from installed bases. These aftermarket strengths also create data-collection opportunities that feed product development and service optimization efforts.

Collaboration and partnership models are evolving as well, with alliances between valve manufacturers, automation vendors, and system integrators becoming more common to deliver turnkey solutions. Strategic acquisitions remain a pathway to complement internal capabilities, especially where niche technologies or regional service networks are required. Additionally, leadership in digital analytics and remote support is a differentiator that supports premium positioning, as customers increasingly expect integrated diagnostic capability and predictable service level agreements. Firms that maintain secure supply chains, transparent compliance practices, and demonstrable innovation roadmaps tend to command stronger commercial credibility with large industrial buyers

Actionable recommendations for industry leaders to strengthen resilience, accelerate product differentiation, monetize services, and structure strategic partnerships for durable advantage

Industry leaders should prioritize a set of actionable moves that reinforce resilience, accelerate differentiation, and create sustainable value streams across the product lifecycle. First, invest in modular design and standardization where feasible to reduce lead times and simplify spare-parts management while preserving the ability to meet application-specific requirements. Second, strengthen aftermarket propositions by formalizing certified repair networks, expanding parts availability close to customer sites, and packaging predictive maintenance services that convert service data into uptime guarantees. These steps will improve customer retention and generate recurring revenue.

Third, pursue targeted supply chain diversification and nearshore options to mitigate tariff exposures and logistical risk, complemented by strategic inventory positioning tuned to critical spare-part risk profiles. Fourth, accelerate the integration of sensors and secure connectivity into new products, combined with analytics offerings that provide actionable insights to asset owners; ensure cybersecurity and data governance are embedded from product inception. Finally, cultivate partnership ecosystems with automation specialists and system integrators to deliver higher-value, turnkey solutions that meet complex industry specifications and shorten procurement cycles. Taken together, these actions deliver immediate operational benefit and build enduring competitive moats

Robust research methodology integrating primary expert engagement, secondary technical verification, triangulation, and scenario analysis to ensure analytical accuracy and contextual relevance

The research approach combined systematic primary engagement with subject-matter experts, rigorous secondary-source synthesis, and iterative validation to ensure analytical integrity. Primary methods included structured interviews with operations leaders, procurement managers, design engineers, and aftermarket specialists across end industries to capture firsthand perspectives on specification drivers, service expectations, and procurement constraints. These qualitative inputs were used to contextualize technical performance attributes and to surface real-world constraints that influence supplier selection and lifecycle management decisions.

Secondary research comprised a thorough review of technical standards, regulatory guidance, supplier technical literature, and public filings to verify claims about materials, testing protocols, compliance practices, and documented performance. Data triangulation was applied across sources, with cross-validation checks to reconcile discrepancies and to strengthen the robustness of conclusions. The methodology also incorporated scenario analysis to explore potential supply chain and regulatory outcomes and their implications for procurement and operational planning. This layered approach ensured that findings reflect both operational realities and the technical nuances that drive equipment selection and service design

Conclusive synthesis reiterating strategic priorities, risk mitigations, lifecycle levers, and leadership imperatives for navigating the evolving pressure control equipment sector

In synthesis, the pressure control equipment domain is being reshaped by accelerating technological integration, evolving regulatory demands, and strategic supply chain recalibration, which together present both risks and opportunities for stakeholders. Manufacturers that align product development with end-user operational priorities, invest in aftermarket capability, and adopt resilient sourcing strategies will be better positioned to capture long-term value. Meanwhile, asset-owning organizations that demand transparency around compliance, lifecycle cost, and service responsiveness will drive suppliers toward higher standards of performance and documentation.

Looking forward, the most effective strategies will be those that balance near-term operational continuity against investments in modularity, digital services, and localized support networks. By emphasizing standardized platforms, robust aftermarket services, secure connectivity, and flexible sourcing, organizations can reduce downtime risk, improve total lifecycle outcomes, and create defensible differentiation. These conclusions should guide leadership discussions about capital allocation, partnership priorities, and where to concentrate R&D and service innovation efforts

Table of Contents

1. Preface

• 1.1. Objectives of the Study
• 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
• 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
• 1.4. Currency & Pricing
• 1.5. Language
• 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

• 5.1. Integration of IoT enabled sensors for real-time pressure monitoring in oil and gas pipelines
• 5.2. Adoption of digital twin simulations to predict performance and maintenance needs of pressure systems
• 5.3. Development of corrosion-resistant smart valves with self-diagnostic capabilities for industrial plants
• 5.4. Use of AI-driven predictive analytics to optimize control loop efficiency in chemical processing
• 5.5. Deployment of wireless pressure transmitters to reduce installation costs in remote monitoring applications
• 5.6. Shift toward low-emission pneumatic controllers complying with new environmental regulations for oil refineries
• 5.7. Integration of blockchain for secure calibration record management across global pressure control operations
• 5.8. Customization of modular pressure regulator platforms to support rapid configuration changes in manufacturing
• 5.9. Emergence of energy harvesting devices to power autonomous pressure measurement nodes in hazardous areas

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Pressure Control Equipment Market, by Valve Type

• 8.1. Ball Valve
• 8.2. Check Valve
• 8.3. Diaphragm Valve
• 8.4. Gate Valve
• 8.5. Globe Valve

9. Pressure Control Equipment Market, by Actuation Type

• 9.1. Electric
• 9.2. Hydraulic
• 9.3. Manual
• 9.4. Pneumatic

10. Pressure Control Equipment Market, by Material Type

• 10.1. Alloy Steel
• 10.2. Carbon Steel
• 10.3. Stainless Steel

11. Pressure Control Equipment Market, by Operation Mode

• 11.1. Automatic
• 11.2. Manual

12. Pressure Control Equipment Market, by End Industry

• 12.1. Chemical Processing
  • 12.1.1. Petrochemical
  • 12.1.2. Specialty Chemical
• 12.2. Oil And Gas
  • 12.2.1. Downstream
  • 12.2.2. Midstream
  • 12.2.3. Upstream
• 12.3. Pharmaceuticals
• 12.4. Power Generation
  • 12.4.1. Nuclear
  • 12.4.2. Renewable
  • 12.4.3. Thermal
• 12.5. Water And Wastewater Treatment

13. Pressure Control Equipment Market, by Region

• 13.1. Americas
  • 13.1.1. North America
  • 13.1.2. Latin America
• 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
  • 13.2.1. Europe
  • 13.2.2. Middle East
  • 13.2.3. Africa
• 13.3. Asia-Pacific

14. Pressure Control Equipment Market, by Group

• 14.1. ASEAN
• 14.2. GCC
• 14.3. European Union
• 14.4. BRICS
• 14.5. G7
• 14.6. NATO

15. Pressure Control Equipment Market, by Country

• 15.1. United States
• 15.2. Canada
• 15.3. Mexico
• 15.4. Brazil
• 15.5. United Kingdom
• 15.6. Germany
• 15.7. France
• 15.8. Russia
• 15.9. Italy
• 15.10. Spain
• 15.11. China
• 15.12. India
• 15.13. Japan
• 15.14. Australia
• 15.15. South Korea

16. Competitive Landscape

• 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
• 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
• 16.3. Competitive Analysis
  • 16.3.1. Emerson Electric Co.
  • 16.3.2. Flowserve Corporation
  • 16.3.3. Schlumberger Limited
  • 16.3.4. ABB Ltd
  • 16.3.5. Honeywell International Inc.
  • 16.3.6. Parker-Hannifin Corporation
  • 16.3.7. Baker Hughes Company
  • 16.3.8. Spirax-Sarco Engineering plc
  • 16.3.9. Yokogawa Electric Corporation
  • 16.3.10. Siemens AG