微电网市场（按技术、电源、组件、额定功率、所有权模式和应用）—2025-2032 年全球预测

预计到 2032 年微电网市场规模将成长至 877.9 亿美元，复合年增长率为 10.69%。

微电网是策略性基础设施资产，可实现关键终端用途的弹性、脱碳和营运灵活性

微电网正逐渐成为商业、政府和关键基础设施领域实现能源弹性、脱碳和分散式营运敏捷性的基础组成部分。透过整合本地发电、储能和控制技术，并与中央电网协同或独立运行，微电网可以管理供电波动、提高可靠性并优化能源经济性。从公用事业公司到核心资产相关人员，越来越多的利益相关者将微电网视为战略资产，它建立了一个平台，将低碳发电与先进的数位控制相结合，同时降低电网中断的风险。

因此，管理层的观点必须涵盖技术选择、所有权模式、监管格局以及集中式系统营运商与分散式能源之间不断变化的相互作用。决策者需要一个平衡的观点，既要掌握微电网的技术架构，也要理解支援大规模部署的商业性框架。这包括了解硬体组件（例如储能和控制器）、编配编配和分析的软体层，以及维护生命週期性能的服务。从概念成熟到营运成熟，该行业正在从孤立的先导计画转向多站点部署，这需要可重复的业务案例和可互通的技术堆迭。

此项倡议为深入分析政策动态、关税影响、细分细微差别、区域差异、竞争定位以及为寻求在未来几年利用微电网战略价值的领导者提供实用建议奠定了基础。

电力电子、数位控制系统和不断发展的法规结构的融合如何重塑微电网的采用和部署路径

在科技、政策倡议和投资者兴趣的共同推动下，微电网格局正在经历一场变革。电力电子、电池化学和数位控制领域的进步显着降低了技术壁垒，并带来了更丰富的控制策略。同时，专注于能源管理、进阶分析和远端监控的软体创新正在透过改进预测、调度优化和故障检测来提高营运效率，降低整体拥有成本，并加快业务成果的实现。

政策和监管环境也在不断发展，逐渐认识到分散式发电对电网稳定性和弹性的价值。许多司法管辖区正在重组奖励机制和互联互通框架，以适应双向电力流动和分散式资产的整合。融资模式也日趋成熟，新的合约方式和第三方所有权选择降低了实施者的资本门槛，并促进了私营部门的更多参与。其结果是从单一站点示范转向投资组合层面的规划，凸显了从工程到融资的可重复流程的重要性。

最后，气候变迁风险和极端天气事件日益频繁，正逐渐引起人们对微电网所提供的韧性优势的关注。企业优先考虑电力连续性和关键负载孤岛能力，将微电网从营运辅助工具提升为核心风险管理工具。这些技术、监管和市场发展的共同作用，正在改变微电网解决方案的采用曲线，并扩大其应用范围。

评估 2025 年美国关税对贸易政策变化时代微电网供应链、采购弹性和计划合的系统性影响

2025年美国关税制度为微电网开发商、技术供应商和投资者创造了一个复杂的商业环境。进口零件的关税调整影响了电力电子、能源储存系统和某些发电设备的供应链。开发商不得不重新评估筹资策略，尽可能优先考虑国产零件，并评估重新设计以减轻高关税零件的影响。结果，许多计划进度发生了变化，开发商不得不寻求替代供应商、延长前置作业时间协议以及与本地製造商的伙伴关係，以恢復成本的可预测性。

投资者和业主对此的应对措施是加强对采购风险的实质审查，并更加重视供应商多元化和合约保护。在一些替代性有限的技术堆迭中，关税对设备选择和计划规模决策产生了重大影响。同时，关税环境加速了垂直整合和策略伙伴关係关係的讨论，这些讨论旨在降低贸易政策波动带来的长期风险。这促使系统整合商、本地製造商和零件供应商之间加强合作，以建立更具韧性的采购布局。

在政策方面，电网营运商和政策制定者已开始重新考虑奖励和互联互通流程，以避免加剧关键韧性计划成本压力的意外后果。许多相关人员对此作出回应，倡导有针对性的减免措施、对某些电网关键设备实行电价豁免，或建立财政支持机制，以维持韧性投资的经济效益。短期来看，2025年电价已促使供应链重组，并促使市场参与企业转向采购韧性和区域能力建构的策略重心。

高解析度细分洞察将技术选择、电源、元件架构、额定功率、所有权模型和应用程式与实际部署决策连结起来

严格的细分视角对于将微电网市场动态转化为切实可行的产品和市场策略至关重要。按技术划分，併网微电网（优先考虑电力公司协调和市场参与）、混合微电网（结合多种发电和储能模式以实现灵活性）以及远程微电网（优先考虑离网或弱电源的自主性和稳健性）的运行模式各有不同。每种技术类别对控制架构、保护方案和冗余规划都有不同的要求。

目录

第一章：前言

第二章调查方法

第三章执行摘要

第四章 市场概况

第五章 市场洞察

• 整合先进的人工智慧驱动能源管理系统，实现即时优化
• 在社区微电网内部署基于区块链的P2P能源交易平台
• 采用可再生能源和柴油发电配置，提高农村復原力
• 在远端微电网基础设施部署中使用物联网感测器实施预测性维护
• 使用动态电网整形逆变器技术扩展公共产业拥有的微电网，以确保即使在高可再生能源渗透率的情况下也能保持稳定性
• 利用绿色债券和官民合作关係的城市资本计划资金筹措模式
• 微电网互联与新联邦能源管理委员会和州级标准的监管合规策略

第六章 2025年美国关税的累积影响

第七章 人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

第 8 章 微电网市场（按技术）

• 并联型微电网
• 混合微电网
• 远端微电网

第九章 微电网市场（按电源）

• 热电联产
• 柴油引擎
• 燃料电池
• 天然气
• 太阳能发电

第 10 章 微电网市场（按组件）

• 硬体
  • 控制器
  • 能源储存系统
  • 发电机
• 服务
  • 咨询
  • 整合和安装
  • 维护和支援
• 软体
  • 进阶分析
  • 能源管理系统
  • 远端监控系统

第 11 章 微型电网市场（依额定功率输出）

• 1～5MW
• 1MW或以下
• 超过10MW
• 5～10MW

第十二章 微型电网市场（依所有权模式）

• 社区拥有的微电网
• 私人/公司拥有的微型电网
• 公共产业拥有的微型电网

第十三章 微电网市场（按应用）

• 商业的
• 防御
• 教育
• 政府
• 公共产业

第十四章 微电网市场（按地区）

• 美洲
  • 北美洲
  • 拉丁美洲
• 欧洲、中东和非洲
  • 欧洲
  • 中东
  • 非洲
• 亚太地区

第 15 章 微电网市场（依类别）

• ASEAN
• GCC
• EU
• BRICS
• G7
• NATO

第十六章 各国微电网市场

• 美国
• 加拿大
• 墨西哥
• 巴西
• 英国
• 德国
• 法国
• 俄罗斯
• 义大利
• 西班牙
• 中国
• 印度
• 日本
• 澳洲
• 韩国

第十七章竞争格局

• 2024年市占率分析
• 2024年FPNV定位矩阵
• 竞争分析
  • ABB Ltd.
  • Bloom Energy Corporation
  • BoxPower Inc.
  • Caterpillar Inc.
  • CleanSpark, Inc.
  • Cummins Inc.
  • Eaton Corporation PLC
  • Emerson Electric Co.
  • Enchanted Rock Holdings, LLC
  • Encorp
  • Enel SpA
  • General Electric Company
  • Gridscape
  • Hitachi, Ltd.
  • Honeywell International Inc.
  • Hover Energy, LLC
  • Intel Corporation
  • Leclanche SA
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation
  • MAN Energy Solutions SE
  • Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
  • Nidec Corporation
  • NRG Energy, Inc.
  • Pareto Energy
  • Power Analytics Global Corporation
  • Powerhive
  • PowerSecure, Inc. by Southern Company
  • S& C Electric Company
  • Scale Microgrid Solutions LLC
  • Schneider Electric SE
  • Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc.
  • Siemens AG
  • Spirae, LLC
  • Tesla, Inc.
  • TotalEnergies SE
  • UL, LLC
  • Veolia Environnement SA

The Microgrid Market is projected to grow by USD 87.79 billion at a CAGR of 10.69% by 2032.

An executive primer that frames microgrids as strategic infrastructure assets for resilience, decarbonization, and operational agility across critical end uses

Microgrids are emerging as foundational constructs for energy resilience, decarbonization, and distributed operational agility across commercial, governmental, and critical infrastructure domains. They combine localized power generation, storage, and control technologies to operate in concert with or independent from central grids, enabling facilities to manage supply variability, enhance reliability, and optimize energy economics. Stakeholders from utilities to owners of mission-critical assets increasingly view microgrids as strategic assets that reduce exposure to grid outages while creating platforms for integrating low-carbon generation and advanced digital controls.

The executive perspective must therefore encompass technology choices, ownership models, regulatory contexts, and the evolving interplay between centralized system operators and distributed energy resources. Decision-makers require a balanced view that captures both the technical architecture of microgrids and the commercial frameworks that enable deployment at scale. This includes an understanding of hardware components such as energy storage and controllers, software layers that orchestrate orchestration and analytics, and services that sustain lifecycle performance. Moving from conceptual to operational maturity, the industry is shifting from isolated pilot projects to multi-site deployments that demand repeatable business cases and interoperable technology stacks.

This introduction sets the stage for an in-depth analysis that navigates policy dynamics, tariff impacts, segmentation nuances, regional differentiation, competitive positioning, and practical recommendations for leaders seeking to harness the strategic value of microgrids in the coming years.

How converging advances in power electronics, digital control systems, and evolving regulatory frameworks are reshaping microgrid adoption and deployment pathways

The microgrid landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by converging forces in technology, policy, and investor interest. Advances in power electronics, battery chemistry, and digital controls have materially reduced technical barriers and enabled richer control strategies, allowing microgrids to perform seamlessly in grid-connected and islanded modes alike. At the same time, software innovations focused on energy management, advanced analytics, and remote monitoring are unlocking operational efficiencies by improving forecasting, dispatch optimization, and fault detection, which in turn reduce total cost of ownership and accelerate time to positive business outcomes.

Policy and regulatory environments are also evolving to recognize the value of distributed resources for grid stability and resilience. Incentive structures and interconnection frameworks in many jurisdictions are being retooled to accommodate two-way power flows and the aggregation of distributed assets. Financial models are maturing as well, with new contracting approaches and third-party ownership options lowering the capital hurdle for adopters and enabling greater private sector participation. The result is a shift from single-site demonstrations to portfolio-level planning, where repeatable engineering-to-finance processes become critical.

Finally, climate risk and the increasing frequency of extreme weather events are concentrating attention on the resilience benefits of microgrids. Organizations are prioritizing power continuity and the ability to island critical loads, which elevates microgrids from an operational adjunct to a core risk management tool. In combination, these technological, regulatory, and market developments are reshaping the adoption curve and expanding the addressable set of applications for microgrid solutions

Assessing the systemic consequences of 2025 United States tariff measures on microgrid supply chains, procurement resilience, and project structuring in a shifting trade policy era

The tariff landscape introduced by the United States in 2025 has created a complex operating environment for microgrid developers, technology vendors, and financiers. Tariff adjustments on imported components affected supply chains for power electronics, energy storage systems, and certain classes of power generation equipment. Developers had to reassess procurement strategies, prioritize domestic sourcing where feasible, and evaluate redesigns that mitigate exposure to high-tariff components. As a result, project timelines shifted in many cases while developers sought alternative suppliers, longer lead-time contracts, or localized manufacturing partnerships to restore cost predictability.

Investors and owners responded by tightening due diligence on procurement risk and by placing greater emphasis on supplier diversification and contractual protections. For some technology stacks where substitution was limited, tariffs materially affected equipment selection and project sizing decisions. Simultaneously, the tariff environment accelerated conversations about vertical integration and strategic partnerships that reduce long-term exposure to trade policy volatility. This has led to an uptick in collaboration between system integrators, local manufacturers, and component suppliers to create more resilient procurement footprints.

On the policy front, grid operators and regulators began reexamining incentives and interconnection processes to avoid unintended consequences that amplify cost pressures for critical resilience projects. Many stakeholders responded by advocating for targeted relief, tariff exemptions for certain grid-critical equipment, or supportive funding mechanisms that preserve the economics of resilience investments. In the near term, the 2025 tariff measures catalyzed a reconfiguration of supply chains and a strategic pivot among market participants toward procurement resilience and local capability development

High-resolution segmentation insights that align technology choices, power sources, component architectures, power ratings, ownership models, and applications to practical deployment decisions

A rigorous segmentation lens is essential to translate microgrid market dynamics into actionable product and market strategies. Based on technology, distinct operational profiles emerge between grid connected microgrids that prioritize utility coordination and market participation, hybrid microgrids that combine multiple generation and storage modalities for flexibility, and remote microgrids that emphasize autonomy and ruggedness for off-grid or weak-grid applications. Each technology class imposes different requirements on control architectures, protection schemes, and redundancy planning.

Based on power source, engineered choices between combined heat and power systems that integrate thermal utilization, diesel and natural gas generators used for reliability and capacity, fuel cells that offer high efficiency and low emissions for specific use cases, and solar photovoltaic systems that supply low-marginal-cost energy, will drive the configuration and operating profile of deployed microgrids. These choices influence operational schedules, emissions profiles, and the economics of storage and dispatch.

Based on component, the interplay of hardware, services, and software determines lifecycle performance. Hardware considerations include controllers, energy storage systems, and power generators that must be selected for reliability and interoperability. Services such as consulting, integration and installation, and maintenance and support are critical to commissioning, performance tuning, and long-term availability. Software layers encompassing advanced analytics, energy management systems, and remote monitoring systems provide the orchestration and visibility required for sophisticated dispatch, predictive maintenance, and seamless transitions between grid-connected and islanded operation.

Based on power rating, system design varies across smaller installations under 1 MW that favor simplicity and rapid deployment, mid-range systems in the 1 MW-5 MW band that balance scalability and cost effectiveness, larger systems above 5 MW-10 MW oriented toward campus or community applications, and very large configurations exceeding 10 MW where utility or industrial scale planning and coordination are required. Each rating segment has unique commissioning, protection coordination, and commercial contracting implications.

Based on ownership model, community-owned microgrids prioritize local control, social benefit, and inclusive governance, private or corporate ownership focuses on operational continuity and financial returns for specific facilities, and utility-owned microgrids bring scale, integration with broader grid planning, and potential for rate-based recovery mechanisms. These ownership choices critically influence financing pathways, stakeholder engagement strategies, and long-term lifecycle obligations.

Based on application, adoption patterns are shaped by the differing needs of commercial estates seeking cost and power quality improvements, defense installations that require hardened resilience and regulatory compliance, education campuses balancing operational continuity with sustainability goals, government sites prioritizing public service continuity and emergency response, and utility applications where microgrids can function as distribution-level assets in grid modernization initiatives. Aligning product roadmaps and service offerings with these application needs enables solution providers to sharpen value propositions and accelerate procurement cycles

Comparative regional dynamics that illuminate how Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific differ in drivers, policy frameworks, and deployment strategies for microgrids

Regional dynamics shape technology selection, procurement strategy, regulatory engagement, and financing approaches for microgrid deployments. In the Americas, demand is often driven by a combination of resilience needs associated with extreme weather events and commercial incentives to integrate renewables and storage. This region exhibits a mature market for private and utility partnerships, active innovation in contracting models, and an emphasis on scaling pilot successes to portfolio approaches across commercial and municipal use cases.

In Europe, Middle East & Africa, deployment drivers are more heterogeneous. European markets frequently center on decarbonization targets, tight regulatory frameworks, and an emphasis on interoperability and grid integration, whereas Middle Eastern initiatives may prioritize energy security and hybridization strategies that pair solar resources with storage and thermal assets. African markets are characterized by a mix of grid-extension challenges and off-grid requirements where remote microgrids serve as pragmatic solutions to accelerate electrification. Across this broad region, regulatory harmonization and financing mechanisms remain pivotal to unlocking broader adoption.

Asia-Pacific presents a diverse set of opportunities informed by rapid urbanization, strong industrial demand centers, and ambitious renewable energy targets. Some markets in the region are deploying microgrids to support industrial parks and ports with high reliability requirements, while emerging markets are leveraging remote microgrids for rural electrification and community development. Supply chain proximity for hardware manufacturing is a competitive advantage for certain countries, and policy incentives can accelerate large-scale pilots into standardized commercial models. Understanding the regionally specific drivers allows stakeholders to prioritize partnerships, local content strategies, and go-to-market approaches that reflect differing regulatory and commercial realities

Competitive landscape analysis that highlights how technology differentiation, integration capability, and service-centric business models define leadership in the microgrid sector

Competitive positioning in the microgrid arena is defined by a blend of technology differentiation, integration capabilities, service delivery, and channel strategies. Key companies are investing in modularized system designs, certification and interoperability testing, and partnerships that bridge hardware, software, and services. Successful players demonstrate deep expertise in controls and power conversion, robust supply chain relationships for energy storage and generation assets, and the ability to deliver comprehensive lifecycle services that include commissioning, remote monitoring, and predictive maintenance.

Market leaders also cultivate financing ecosystems that reduce customer capital intensity, offering performance contracting, third-party ownership, and lease structures that align cost recovery with operational savings. Strategic alliances with utilities, EPC firms, and local integrators are common as organizations seek to expand geographic footprint and manage installation risk. Additionally, investment in software platforms that provide advanced analytics, demand response integration, and market participation capabilities has become a differentiator for companies aiming to extract recurring revenue streams beyond one-time hardware sales.

Intellectual property around control algorithms, grid-islanding techniques, and cybersecurity hardened architectures provides meaningful separation for vendors competing in mission-critical segments. At the same time, smaller specialized firms often win on customization, rapid deployment, and niche vertical expertise. Collectively, these dynamics create a competitive landscape where scale, breadth of offering, and deep service capabilities determine which companies capture enterprise and utility engagements

Actionable strategic priorities for market leaders focused on procurement resilience, software differentiation, financing innovation, and proactive regulatory engagement

Industry leaders should adopt a pragmatic set of actions that balance near-term delivery with long-term strategic positioning. First, they should prioritize supplier diversification and develop contingency procurement plans to mitigate exposure to trade policy disruptions and component lead-time risks. This includes assessing supply chain visibility, qualifying alternate vendors, and exploring localized assembly or manufacturing partnerships where commercially viable. Such measures reduce single-source dependence and improve programmatic resilience.

Second, firms should accelerate investments in software and analytics capabilities that enhance operational performance and enable new service models. Integrating advanced energy management, remote monitoring, and predictive maintenance into product portfolios will unlock recurring revenue opportunities and deepen customer relationships. Investing in standardized APIs and interoperability testing will also reduce integration friction with utility systems and third-party DER platforms.

Third, stakeholders need to expand financing options and tailor ownership models to customer preferences. Offering creative contracting such as energy as a service, shared savings agreements, and hybrid CAPEX-OPEX approaches can lower adoption barriers and align incentives across project stakeholders. Leaders should also pursue strategic partnerships with financiers and insurers to construct risk-aware funding vehicles.

Finally, companies must engage proactively with regulators and grid operators to shape interconnection frameworks and compensation mechanisms that reflect the value of resilience and grid services. Demonstrating the reliability and ancillary service capabilities of microgrids through pilots and data-driven case studies will help build constructive policy outcomes. By combining procurement resilience, software differentiation, innovative financing, and regulatory engagement, industry leaders can accelerate adoption and capture sustainable value

A rigorous mixed-method research approach combining primary stakeholder interviews, secondary evidence synthesis, technical due diligence, and peer-validated scenario analysis

The research methodology integrates multi-disciplinary techniques to ensure robust, reproducible, and decision-grade insights. Primary research involved structured interviews and consultations with a representative cross-section of stakeholders including system integrators, owners and operators of critical assets, utility planners, technology vendors, and policy advisors to capture firsthand perspectives on technical challenges, procurement choices, and regulatory considerations. These interviews were designed to surface real-world constraints and successful mitigation strategies that shape deployment outcomes.

Secondary research synthesized public filings, technical standards, regulatory rulings, and industry white papers to contextualize primary findings within the broader policy and technological landscape. Technical due diligence incorporated product datasheets, certification records, and interoperability specifications to evaluate component suitability and system architectures. Comparative analysis of supplier offerings and service models was performed to identify differentiation vectors and potential gaps.

Scenario analysis was used to stress-test supply chain exposures and tariff impacts by examining procurement pathways and alternative sourcing options. Case study development focused on representative implementations across different ownership models and applications to translate abstract drivers into actionable lessons for practitioners. Throughout the process, rigorous cross-validation between primary inputs and documentary evidence was employed to ensure consistency, and findings were peer-reviewed by subject matter experts to reinforce technical accuracy and practical relevance

A conclusive synthesis emphasizing that resilient procurement, software-enabled services, tailored financing, and regulatory collaboration are essential to scale microgrid adoption

In conclusion, microgrids are maturing from experimental deployments into strategic infrastructure elements that address resilience, sustainability, and operational efficiency. Technological advances in power conversion, storage, and software controls, combined with evolving regulatory recognition of distributed resource value, create an environment where microgrids can deliver tangible benefits across a wide range of applications. However, trade policy shifts and supply chain constraints introduced new layers of complexity that require proactive procurement and partnership strategies.

Segmentation clarity enables stakeholders to match solution architectures to specific operational requirements, whether that means selecting the appropriate technology class, optimizing the power source mix, defining component and software needs, sizing systems to rated power bands, choosing ownership frameworks, or aligning to distinct applications. Regional nuances further inform go-to-market tactics and partnership selection, as the drivers and enablers differ materially between the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. Competitive positioning will favor organizations that combine integrated product portfolios, lifecycle services, and financing flexibility.

Looking forward, industry actors that invest in resilient supply chains, software-enabled services, flexible financing, and constructive regulatory engagement will be best positioned to translate near-term opportunities into sustained leadership. The pathway to scale lies in repeatable engineering and commercial models that reduce deployment friction, improve predictability, and demonstrate clear value for all stakeholders

Table of Contents

1. Preface

• 1.1. Objectives of the Study
• 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
• 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
• 1.4. Currency & Pricing
• 1.5. Language
• 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

• 5.1. Integration of advanced AI-driven energy management systems for real-time microgrid optimization
• 5.2. Deployment of blockchain-based peer-to-peer energy trading platforms within community microgrids
• 5.3. Adoption of hybrid renewable and diesel generation configurations for rural microgrid resilience
• 5.4. Implementation of predictive maintenance using IoT sensors in remote microgrid infrastructure deployments
• 5.5. Scaling of utility-owned microgrids with dynamic grid-forming inverter technology for stability under high renewable penetration
• 5.6. Financing models leveraging green bonds and public-private partnerships for urban microgrid capital projects
• 5.7. Regulatory compliance strategies for microgrid interconnection under emerging FERC and state-level standards

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Microgrid Market, by Technology

• 8.1. Grid connected Microgrids
• 8.2. Hybrid Microgrids
• 8.3. Remote Microgrids

9. Microgrid Market, by Power Source

• 9.1. Combined Heat & Power
• 9.2. Diesel
• 9.3. Fuel Cell
• 9.4. Natural Gas
• 9.5. Solar Photovoltaic

10. Microgrid Market, by Component

• 10.1. Hardware
  • 10.1.1. Controllers
  • 10.1.2. Energy Storage Systems
  • 10.1.3. Power Generators
• 10.2. Services
  • 10.2.1. Consulting
  • 10.2.2. Integration & Installation
  • 10.2.3. Maintenance & Support
• 10.3. Software
  • 10.3.1. Advanced Analytics
  • 10.3.2. Energy Management Systems
  • 10.3.3. Remote Monitoring Systems

11. Microgrid Market, by Power Rating

• 11.1. 1 MW-5 MW
• 11.2. Less than 1 MW
• 11.3. More than 10 MW
• 11.4. More than 5 MW-10 MW

12. Microgrid Market, by Ownership Model

• 12.1. Community-Owned Microgrids
• 12.2. Private/Corporate-Owned Microgrids
• 12.3. Utility-Owned Microgrids

13. Microgrid Market, by Application

• 13.1. Commercial
• 13.2. Defense
• 13.3. Education
• 13.4. Government
• 13.5. Utility

14. Microgrid Market, by Region

• 14.1. Americas
  • 14.1.1. North America
  • 14.1.2. Latin America
• 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
  • 14.2.1. Europe
  • 14.2.2. Middle East
  • 14.2.3. Africa
• 14.3. Asia-Pacific

15. Microgrid Market, by Group

• 15.1. ASEAN
• 15.2. GCC
• 15.3. European Union
• 15.4. BRICS
• 15.5. G7
• 15.6. NATO

16. Microgrid Market, by Country

• 16.1. United States
• 16.2. Canada
• 16.3. Mexico
• 16.4. Brazil
• 16.5. United Kingdom
• 16.6. Germany
• 16.7. France
• 16.8. Russia
• 16.9. Italy
• 16.10. Spain
• 16.11. China
• 16.12. India
• 16.13. Japan
• 16.14. Australia
• 16.15. South Korea

17. Competitive Landscape

• 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
• 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
• 17.3. Competitive Analysis
  • 17.3.1. ABB Ltd.
  • 17.3.2. Bloom Energy Corporation
  • 17.3.3. BoxPower Inc.
  • 17.3.4. Caterpillar Inc.
  • 17.3.5. CleanSpark, Inc.
  • 17.3.6. Cummins Inc.
  • 17.3.7. Eaton Corporation PLC
  • 17.3.8. Emerson Electric Co.
  • 17.3.9. Enchanted Rock Holdings, LLC
  • 17.3.10. Encorp
  • 17.3.11. Enel S.p.A.
  • 17.3.12. General Electric Company
  • 17.3.13. Gridscape
  • 17.3.14. Hitachi, Ltd.
  • 17.3.15. Honeywell International Inc.
  • 17.3.16. Hover Energy, LLC
  • 17.3.17. Intel Corporation
  • 17.3.18. Leclanche SA
  • 17.3.19. Lockheed Martin Corporation
  • 17.3.20. MAN Energy Solutions SE
  • 17.3.21. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
  • 17.3.22. Nidec Corporation
  • 17.3.23. NRG Energy, Inc.
  • 17.3.24. Pareto Energy
  • 17.3.25. Power Analytics Global Corporation
  • 17.3.26. Powerhive
  • 17.3.27. PowerSecure, Inc. by Southern Company
  • 17.3.28. S&C Electric Company
  • 17.3.29. Scale Microgrid Solutions LLC
  • 17.3.30. Schneider Electric SE
  • 17.3.31. Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc.
  • 17.3.32. Siemens AG
  • 17.3.33. Spirae, LLC
  • 17.3.34. Tesla, Inc.
  • 17.3.35. TotalEnergies SE
  • 17.3.36. UL, LLC
  • 17.3.37. Veolia Environnement SA