查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
微电网整合商排行榜:Guidehouse Research Leaderboard
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1811149

微电网整合商排行榜:Guidehouse Research Leaderboard

Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Report: Microgrid Integrators - Assessment of Strategy and Execution for 15 Microgrid Integration Service Providers
出版日期: | 出版商: Guidehouse Research | 英文 50 Pages | 订单完成后即时交付

价格

微电网整合商市场由寻求解决方案以提高能源弹性、降低营运成本和支援脱碳的企业推动。监管要求、企业永续发展承诺以及技术成本的下降正在推动商业、工业和关键基础设施领域的成长。儘管监管不确定性和电网整合课题仍然存在，但采用率正在成长，尤其是在弹性和灵活性至关重要的应用中。

本报告根据战略和执行能力对 15 家领先的微电网整合商进行了比较。评估基于多项标准，包括愿景、技术、地理覆盖范围、产品组合和永续性。此分析反映了软体驱动整合、模组化系统设计和灵活融资模式（例如能源即服务）日益增长的重要性。凭藉全球影响力、先进的控制平台和强大的合作伙伴生态系统实现差异化的企业，在竞争激烈的环境中更有能力提供差异化的价值。

主要亮点包括转向以服务为中心的商业模式和整合硬体、软体和生命週期服务的交钥匙解决方案的转变。战略合作伙伴关係、对数位平台的投资以及提供可扩展、可靠的解决方案的能力已成为关键的成功因素。随着行业的成熟，将技术创新与自适应商业模式和有效执行策略相结合的供应商有望巩固其地位。本报告旨在指导决策者应对由弹性需求、电气化目标和分散式能源日益增长的作用所驱动的快速变化的市场。

目录

第1章 摘要整理

第2章 市场概要

  • 简介
  • 科技定义
  • 市场促进因素
  • 市场阻碍因素
  • 市场趋势

第3章 Guidehouse Research Leaderboard

  • Guidehouse Research Leaderboard的类别
    • 领导者
    • 竞争者
    • 课题者
    • 追随者
  • 指南住宅调查排行榜电网

第4章 企业排行榜

  • 领导者
    • Schneider Electric
    • Siemens
    • ENGIE
    • ABB
    • GE Vernova
  • 竞争者
    • Honeywell
    • Tesla
    • Enchanted Rock
    • Scale Microgrids
    • PowerSecure
    • Ameresco
    • BoxPower
    • Aggreko
    • Con Edison
    • Clarke Energy

第5章 缩写与简称一览

第6章 目录

第7章 图表

Product Code: LB-MINT-25

The microgrid integration market is accelerating as organizations seek solutions that improve energy resilience, reduce operational costs, and support decarbonization objectives. Regulatory mandates, corporate sustainability commitments, and declining technology costs are driving growth across commercial, industrial, and critical infrastructure sectors. While regulatory uncertainty and grid integration challenges persist, the trajectory indicates increasing deployment, particularly in applications where resilience and flexibility are essential.

This Guidehouse Research Leaderboard provides a comparative assessment of 15 leading microgrid integrators based on their strategy and execution capabilities. Vendors were evaluated across multiple criteria, including Vision, Technology, Geographic Reach, Product Portfolio, and Staying Power. The analysis reflects the growing importance of software-driven integration, modular system design, and flexible financing models such as energy-as-a-service. Companies that distinguish themselves through global reach, advanced control platforms, and robust partner ecosystems are best positioned to deliver differentiated value in this competitive landscape.

Key findings highlight a shift toward service-centric business models and turnkey solutions that integrate hardware, software, and life cycle services. Strategic partnerships, investment in digital platforms, and the ability to deliver scalable, financeable solutions are emerging as critical success factors. Vendors that align technology innovation with adaptable business models and effective execution strategies are likely to strengthen their position as the industry matures. This report is designed to guide decision-makers navigating a rapidly changing market shaped by resilience needs, electrification goals, and the growing role of distributed energy resources.

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

  • 1.1 Market Introduction
  • 1.2 The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Grid

2. Market Overview

  • 2.1 Introduction
  • 2.2 Technology Definitions
  • 2.3 Market Drivers
  • 2.4 Market Barriers
  • 2.5 Market Trends

3. The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard

  • 3.1 The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Categories
    • 3.1.1 Leaders
    • 3.1.2 Contenders
    • 3.1.3 Challengers
    • 3.1.4 Followers
  • 3.2 The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Grid

4. Company Rankings

  • 4.1 Leaders
    • 4.1.1 Schneider Electric
    • 4.1.2 Siemens
    • 4.1.3 ENGIE
    • 4.1.4 ABB
    • 4.1.5 GE Vernova
  • 4.2 Contenders
    • 4.2.1 Honeywell
    • 4.2.2 Tesla
    • 4.2.3 Enchanted Rock
    • 4.2.4 Scale Microgrids
    • 4.2.5 PowerSecure
    • 4.2.6 Ameresco
    • 4.2.7 BoxPower
    • 4.2.8 Aggreko
    • 4.2.9 Con Edison
    • 4.2.10 Clarke Energy

5. Acronym and Abbreviation List

6. Table of Contents

7. Table of Charts and Figures

  • 8.1 Scope of Study
  • 8.2 Sources and Methodology
    • 8.2.1 Vendor Selection
    • 8.2.2 Ratings Scale
      • 8.2.2.1 Score Calculations
    • 8.2.3 Criteria Definitions
      • 8.2.3.1 Strategy
      • 8.2.3.2 Execution

List of Tables

  • Table 3-1. The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Overall Scores

List of Figures

  • Chart 1-1. The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Grid
  • Chart 2-1. Annual Microgrid Capacity Additions by Region, World Markets: 2025-2034
  • Chart 3-1. The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Grid
  • Chart 4-1. Schneider Electric Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-2. Siemens Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-3. ENGIE Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-4. ABB Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-5. GE Vernova Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-6. Honeywell Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-7. Tesla Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-8. Enchanted Rock Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-9. Scale Microgrids Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-10. PowerSecure Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-11. Ameresco Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-12. BoxPower Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-13. Aggreko Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-14. Con Edison Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Chart 4-15. Clarke Energy Strategy and Execution Scores