![]() |
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1853813
氦气市场按产品形式、供应来源、等级类型、最终用途和分销管道划分-2025-2032年全球预测Helium Market by Product Form, Source, Grade Type, End-Use, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032 |
||||||
※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。
预计到 2032 年,氦气市场规模将成长至 53.4 亿美元,复合年增长率为 4.97%。
| 关键市场统计数据 | |
|---|---|
| 基准年2024年 | 36.2亿美元 |
| 预计年份:2025年 | 37.9亿美元 |
| 预测年份 2032 | 53.4亿美元 |
| 复合年增长率 (%) | 4.97% |
氦气市场处于关键工业需求与有限自然资源供应的交汇点,使其成为科技、医疗保健、航太和製造业等企业策略发展的必然选择。本文不仅将氦气视为一种商品,更将其定位为一种具有重要应用价值的气体,其供应和质量影响着从半导体冷却、核磁共振成像到洩漏检测和火箭推进等诸多领域。随着相关人员日益面临供应链脆弱性、供应来源多元化和产品规格不断变化等挑战,这本简明权威的说明对于优先考虑投资和风险缓解策略的经营团队和技术领导者至关重要。
本节概述了氦气的核心技术特性,这些特性支撑着氦气的独特价值提案,包括其低沸点、惰性和极低的反应活性,这些特性对于低温应用和对污染敏感的製程至关重要。本节也清楚阐述了气态和液态氦气的采购、储存和运输的实际操作情况,以及这些实际情况如何与行业特定的等级要求相互作用。预先理解这些基本概念有助于读者更好地理解后续章节中讨论的下游影响,包括关税的影响、市场区隔动态以及区域供需互动。
最后,引言部分明确了本执行摘要的目标读者:需要全面了解策略风险和营运槓桿的高阶主管、采购主管、技术主管和投资者关係负责人。有了这些基础知识,相关人员就能更有效地解读策略建议,并将其应用于公司规划、资本配置和伙伴关係策略。
技术创新、供应限制和终端用户需求的不断变化正在重塑氦气市场格局,进而影响竞争动态和策略重点。近年来,半导体製造和高场强医学影像技术的进步显着提升了对高纯度和超高纯氦气的需求,而航太和国防应用则推动了洩漏测试和增压系统对高精度氦气的需求。同时,回收技术的出现以及为降低原生矿开采波动风险而采取的替代筹资策略,促使人们重新评估传统的氦气供应链。
同时,製造技术的创新正在改变消费模式。晶圆级冷却和低温处理需要对气态和液态氦进行更严格的纯度控制和更紧迫的交货期限。这种技术转变迫使供应商投资更先进的纯化技术、库存管理和专用封装解决方案。因此,商业关係越来越重视长期承购协议、技术服务能力和一体化物流,以确保业务线的连续性。
此外,监管和地缘政治的发展正在加速战略多元化。企业正在调整筹资策略,以平衡与初级开采设施和空气分离整合相关的集中风险。总而言之,这些转变为伙伴关係、垂直整合和附加价值服务创造了新的途径,这些途径优先考虑供应商和最终用户之间的信任、可追溯性和技术合作。
关税的实施将促使供应链重组、成本调整和策略采购策略转变,而美国宣布的关税措施将持续到2025年,这正促使采购和营运团队进行广泛的重新评估。关税既影响外部采购氦气的到岸成本,也影响根据不同贸易条款谈判达成的现有合约安排的有效性。因此,买卖双方必须考虑其供应链网路的韧性,重新评估现有的物流协议,并考虑替代路线和采购方式,以维持营运的连续性和利润率。
为应对关税压力,许多企业可能会优先考虑近岸外包、更多地依赖回收氦气以及策略性储备,以缓衝短期价格波动和潜在的交付中断。这种调整不仅限于采购负责人。供应商可能会评估其全球分销布局,并加快对区域性灌装厂、精炼设备和气瓶管理系统的投资,以降低跨境风险。同时,对氦气高度依赖的下游产业可能会加强与供应商在合约保护、服务水准协议和紧急计画方面的合作,以确保敏感设备的运作。
重要的是,关税也为技术和营运创新提供了奖励。企业可能会增加对氦气回收系统、终端用气封闭式管理以及製程优化的投资,以降低消耗强度。所有这些因应措施的总体目标是在透过有针对性的投资和适应性筹资策略来应对贸易经济变化带来的财务和营运影响的同时,维持供应的可靠性。
市场细分为解读不同产品属性、来源类型、等级规格、最终用途和通路的需求模式和供应响应提供了一个实用的视角。依产品形态划分,气态氦和液态氦的市场营运动态存在差异。气态氦通常用于现场製程和连续流动,而液态氦则用于低温应用和散装运输,两者所需的储存、处理和运输解决方案各不相同。按来源划分,供应基础涵盖了不同的产品细分市场:能够生产少量氦气的空气分离装置;从天然气天然气田提取的浓缩氦气;以及从停产工艺和特殊作业中回收的循环氦气,每个细分市场的成本结构和可扩展性都各不相同。
氦气等级细分进一步平衡了供需关係:气球级氦气满足纯度较低、用量较大的休閒需求,而高纯度和科研级氦气则用于对污染敏感的製程流程。超高纯度 (UHP) 氦气则用于半导体製造和尖端科学研究,这些领域对微量污染物零容忍,需要精密的提纯和处理设备。按最终用途细分,可以发现不同的消费行为,例如航太和国防领域,洩漏测试和火箭增压需要可靠且精确的氦气供应;电子和半导体领域,晶片製造和晶圆冷却优先考虑超高纯度氦气的持续供应;以及医疗保健领域,磁共振成像 (MRI) 和核磁共振波谱分析需要稳定的氦气质量和及时的补充,服务中断。
在金属製造和加工行业,气焊和金属电弧焊接、高温硬焊和锡焊以及雷射切割和焊接对气体流量和纯度的要求各不相同,这会影响包装和生产计划。此外,分销管道的细分也反映了买方参与方式的差异。线下通路包括直接销售的B2B模式以及经销商和工业气体供应商网络,这些通路维护着长期的技术服务关係;而线上通路则提供简化的订购流程和广泛的标准化需求通路。结合这些细分视角,供应商和买方可以根据每个细分市场的特定需求,设计有针对性的提案、技术服务和库存策略。
区域驱动因素影响整个供应链的韧性和风险敞口,影响采购选择和投资重点的因素因地区而异。在美洲,强大的技术丛集、完善的医疗基础设施和航太产业集中了对高纯度和特种氦气解决方案的需求,推动了对本地化物流、气瓶管理和回收倡议的投资,以减少对远距进口的依赖。该地区的供应商通常强调服务合约和技术支援能力,以满足对执行时间要求极高的应用,并降低与开采和进口模式相关的集中风险。
在欧洲、中东和非洲,不同的管理体制和产业基础造就了错综复杂的需求讯号。在欧洲部分地区,先进的製造地和医疗保健系统需要严格的纯度控制和可靠的供应体系,而该地区的其他部分则日益注重基础设施建设和扩大本地供给能力。中东的能源和自然资源开发带来了潜在的初级开采点,而在非洲,人们越来越关注透过探勘和开发计划来利用伴生气,儘管物流和商业化路径仍然是相关人员关注的焦点。
亚太地区工业快速成长,半导体製造能力规模庞大,医疗保健服务覆盖率不断扩大,因此,该地区对超高纯度供应链和大规模物流的战略重视程度日益提高。亚太地区的一些製造商和研究机构优先考虑安全、长期的供应安排和技术合作,包括回收和在地化服务。在每个地区内部,跨境贸易动态、监管因素和基础设施成熟度都会影响买卖双方的投资重点。
在氦气生态系中,企业间的竞争力日益取决于技术服务能力、垂直整合以及确保关键应用所需的纯度和连续性。领先的供应商透过投资提纯技术、气瓶和低温资产网路以及数位物流平台来提升可追溯性和交付准确性,从而实现差异化竞争优势。许多公司正在拓展其价值提案,使其不再局限于商品供应,而是涵盖现场管理、回收系统以及客製化的服务等级协议,以降低敏感产业客户的营运风险。
策略伙伴关係和合资企业已成为保障原料供应和扩大本地产能的有效机制,尤其是在初级采矿业刚起步或空气分离技术正在提升供应量的地区。能够将上游资源与下游服务结合的公司可以提供一揽子解决方案,解决技术和物流方面的痛点,从而建立竞争优势。同时,专注于超高纯度原料或特殊低温物流的利基供应商则凭藉卓越的技术和应对力展开竞争,服务于那些无法容忍任何中断的科研实验室、半导体製造厂和航太客户。
同时,市场参与企业正数位化投入,以改善气瓶追踪、优化充填週期并预测客户现场的营运需求。这些能力能够减少管理摩擦、提高合约透明度,并使长期伙伴关係对供应商和买家更具吸引力。最终,那些兼具技术实力、灵活商业模式和本地化物流的公司,将更有优势赢得与关键任务应用相关的优质合约。
产业领导者应采取一系列切实可行的措施,以增强供应安全、降低消耗强度并提高商业性韧性。首先,应优先投资于关键使用点的氦气回收和闭合迴路系统,以减少对外部供应的依赖,同时提升永续性。此类投资应与严格的洩漏检测和回收计划相结合,以减少损失并延长购买氦气的有效使用寿命。
第二,我们将透过结合本地灌装能力、回收供应协议以及包含技术性能条款的选择性长期承购协议,实现筹资策略多元化。这种多管齐下的方法可以降低对单一来源的风险,并协调整个价值链的奖励,从而提高可靠性和服务品质。第三,为了满足日益增长的高纯度和超纯等级产品需求,我们将投资于纯化和包装产能,并开发灵活的配送模式,以适应散装液体的交付和频繁的气体补给。
第四,我们将加强合约框架,包括明确的服务等级协定、紧急条款以及能够应对贸易和关税波动的透明定价机制。第五,我们将与主要终端用户进行合作研发和试验计画,以优化降低氦气浓度、回收和循环利用氦气流的製程设计,并在技术可行的情况下检验替代方案。最后,我们将建立用于气瓶追踪、需求预测和预测性维护的数位化平台,以提高营运视觉性并支援数据主导的采购决策。这些措施将有助于我们在保障短期供应安全与实现长期效率和永续性目标之间取得平衡。
为确保研究的严谨性和有效性,调查方法,包括与业界从业人员的直接接触、结构化专家访谈以及对供应链和产品规格的技术检验。直接接触对象包括采购负责人、技术经理和物流协调员,他们提供了关于消费模式、营运限制和服务期望的定性见解。此外,还与负责低温处理、精炼製程和气瓶管理的技术专家进行了讨论,以检验关于等级要求和使用情境的假设。
本二次研究系统性地查阅了公开的技术出版物、监管指南和行业协会资料,以建立氦气特性、最佳操作规范和最终用途标准的基准。透过将主要访谈结果与技术文件和营运案例案例研究进行交叉核对,进行了交叉检验,以确保从业人员报告的行为与已记录的程序一致。此外,还透过情境分析和敏感度检验,进一步完善了数据,以检验应对供应中断、贸易变化和需求转移的合理操作措施。
在整个研究过程中,我们始终强调假设的透明度、原始资料的可追溯性以及研究结果在不同产业环境中的适用性。这种调查方法既能确保结论的可靠性,又能帮助实务工作者根据自身的营运和策略限制调整研究成果。
儘管氦气在多个高价值产业中至关重要,但其供应受到专业提取、加工和物流环节的限制。确保供应的持续性需要技术投资、商业性创新和本地产能建设三管齐下。积极投资于回收、本地化灌装和精炼基础设施以及加强供应商伙伴关係的相关人员,将更有能力管理营运风险,并抓住与先进製造和科学应用相关的策略机会。
决策者应将氦气管理视为采购、工程和永续性目标交会处的一项企业级挑战。与临时采购策略相比,整合技术升级、合约弹性以及数位化透明度的协作倡议更有可能取得更可靠的成果。此外,与供应商和同行合作(例如共用復原计画和区域补充投资)可以减轻贸易中断的影响,并降低对集中开采资源的依赖。
摘要,提升韧性和竞争力的关键在于将技术能力与商业策略结合,并辅以针对性的復苏和本地化物流投资。透过这些综合措施,企业可以保护关键运营,提高成本可预测性,并推动长期永续性目标。
The Helium Market is projected to grow by USD 5.34 billion at a CAGR of 4.97% by 2032.
| KEY MARKET STATISTICS | |
|---|---|
| Base Year [2024] | USD 3.62 billion |
| Estimated Year [2025] | USD 3.79 billion |
| Forecast Year [2032] | USD 5.34 billion |
| CAGR (%) | 4.97% |
The helium market sits at the intersection of critical industrial demand and constrained natural supply, creating a strategic imperative for organizations across technology, healthcare, aerospace, and manufacturing. This introduction frames helium not merely as a commodity but as an enabling gas whose availability and quality influence everything from semiconductor cooling and MRI imaging to leak detection and rocket propulsion. As stakeholders increasingly confront supply chain fragility, diversified sources, and evolving product specifications, a concise and authoritative orientation is vital for executives and technical leaders seeking to prioritize investments and risk-mitigation strategies.
This section establishes the context for the analysis that follows by outlining the core technical properties of helium that underpin its unique value proposition, including low boiling point, inertness, and minimal reactivity that make it indispensable for ultra-low temperature applications and contamination-sensitive processes. It also articulates the operational realities of sourcing, storing, and transporting helium across gaseous and liquid forms, and how those realities interact with industry-specific grade requirements. By establishing these fundamentals up front, readers will better appreciate the downstream implications explored in subsequent sections, including tariff impacts, segmentation dynamics, and regional supply-demand interactions.
Finally, the introduction clarifies the intended audience for this executive summary: senior managers, procurement leads, technical directors, and investor relations professionals who require a synthesis of strategic risks and operational levers. With this foundational understanding, stakeholders can more effectively interpret the strategic recommendations and apply them to corporate planning, capital allocation, and partnership strategies.
The landscape for helium has experienced transformative shifts driven by technological innovation, supply constraints, and evolving end-use requirements, reshaping competitive dynamics and strategic priorities. Over recent cycles, advances in semiconductor fabrication and high-field medical imaging have materially increased demand for high-purity and ultra-high-purity helium, while aerospace and defense applications have pushed precision supply needs for leak testing and pressurant systems. Concurrently, recycling technologies and alternative sourcing strategies have emerged to mitigate exposure to primary extraction volatility, prompting a re-evaluation of traditional supply chains.
At the same time, manufacturing innovations have altered consumption patterns: wafer-scale cooling and cryogenic processing require both gaseous and liquid helium managed with greater purity controls and tighter delivery windows. These technical shifts compel suppliers to invest in enhanced purification, inventory management, and specialty packaging solutions. As a result, commercial relationships increasingly emphasize long-term offtake agreements, technical service capabilities, and integrated logistics to guarantee continuity for mission-critical operations.
Moreover, regulatory and geopolitical developments have accelerated strategic diversification. Firms are adjusting sourcing strategies to balance concentration risks associated with primary extraction facilities and air separation integration. Collectively, these shifts create new vectors for partnerships, vertical integration, and value-added services that prioritize reliability, traceability, and technical collaboration between suppliers and end users.
The imposition of tariffs can act as a catalyst for supply chain restructuring, cost realignment, and strategic sourcing shifts, and the United States tariff developments announced for 2025 are prompting widespread reassessment across procurement and operations teams. Tariff measures influence both the landed cost of externally sourced helium and the viability of existing contractual arrangements that were negotiated under different trade conditions. Consequently, buyers and suppliers must examine the elasticity of their supply networks, reassess incumbent logistics contracts, and explore alternative routing and sourcing to preserve operational continuity and margin profiles.
In response to tariff pressures, many organizations will prioritize near-shoring, increased reliance on recycled helium streams, and strategic stockpiling to buffer short-term price volatility and potential delivery disruptions. This recalibration is not limited to procurers; suppliers are evaluating their global distribution footprints and may accelerate investments in localized fill plants, purification assets, and cylinder management systems to reduce cross-border exposure. At the same time, downstream industries with critical helium dependencies are likely to intensify collaboration with suppliers on contractual protections, service-level agreements, and contingency planning to preserve uptime for sensitive equipment.
Importantly, tariffs also incentivize technological and operational innovation. Firms are likely to invest more in helium reclamation systems, closed-loop gas management at point-of-use, and process optimization to reduce consumption intensity. Across these responses, the prevailing objective is to maintain reliability of supply while managing the financial and operational effects of altered trade economics through targeted investments and adaptive sourcing strategies.
Segmentation provides a practical lens to interpret demand patterns and supply responses across different product attributes, source types, grade specifications, end-use applications, and distribution channels. When examined by product form, the market's operational dynamics diverge between gaseous helium, which typically supports on-site processes and continuous flows, and liquid helium, which enables cryogenic applications and bulk transfers, each demanding distinct storage, handling, and transport solutions. Transitioning to sources, the supply base spans air separation units that can produce modest volumes as a co-product, primary extraction from natural gas fields that yields concentrated streams, and recycled helium recovered from closed processes or specialty operations, each pathway carrying different cost structures and scalability profiles.
Grade type segmentation further refines supply and demand alignment, because balloon grade helium serves low-purity, high-volume recreational needs while high-purity and research grade helium address contamination-sensitive processes. Ultra-high purity (UHP) grades underpin semiconductor fabrication and advanced scientific research where trace contaminants are unacceptable, necessitating advanced purification and handling infrastructure. End-use segmentation reveals differentiated consumption behaviors across aerospace and defense applications-where leak testing and rocket pressurant demand reliability and precise delivery-electronics and semiconductors where chip fabrication and wafer cooling prioritize UHP supply continuity, and healthcare and medical fields where MRI and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy require consistent quality and timely replenishment to avoid service disruptions.
Within metal production and fabrication, gas-metal arc welding, high-temperature brazing and soldering, and laser cutting and welding each impose varying flow rates and purity demands that influence packaging and scheduling. Lastly, distribution channel segmentation illustrates a bifurcation in buyer engagement: offline channels, encompassing direct sales B2B arrangements and a network of distributors or industrial gas suppliers, maintain long-standing technical service relationships, whereas online channels offer streamlined ordering and broader accessibility for standardized needs. Together, these segmentation perspectives enable suppliers and buyers to design targeted commercial propositions, technical service offerings, and inventory strategies tailored to the nuanced requirements of each segment.
Regional dynamics shape both resilience and exposure across supply chains, with distinctive drivers influencing procurement choices and investment priorities in each geography. In the Americas, robust technology clusters, extensive healthcare infrastructure, and aerospace manufacturing concentrate demand for high-purity and specialty helium solutions, prompting investments in localized logistics, cylinder management, and recovery initiatives to reduce reliance on long-distance imports. Suppliers in this region often emphasize service agreements and technical support capabilities to meet uptime-critical applications and to mitigate concentration risks tied to extraction and import patterns.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, diverse regulatory regimes and varied industrial bases create a mosaic of demand signals. Advanced manufacturing hubs and healthcare systems in parts of Europe require stringent purity controls and reliable delivery, while other areas in the region are increasingly focused on building foundational infrastructure and expanding local supply capabilities. Energy and natural resource developments in the Middle East introduce potential points of primary extraction, and across Africa there is growing interest in leveraging natural gas-associated helium through exploration and development projects, though logistics and commercialization pathways remain a central focus for stakeholders.
The Asia-Pacific region combines rapid industrial growth, significant semiconductor capacity, and expanding healthcare access, resulting in heightened strategic emphasis on ultra-high-purity supply chains and large-scale logistics. Manufacturers and research institutions in parts of Asia-Pacific prioritize secure, long-duration supply arrangements and technical partnerships that include reclamation and on-site servicing. Across all regions, cross-border trade dynamics, regulatory considerations, and infrastructure maturity levels shape how buyers and suppliers prioritize investments, with an overarching trend toward strengthening local capabilities and redundancy to enhance supply assurance.
Competitive dynamics among companies in the helium ecosystem are increasingly defined by technical service capabilities, vertical integration, and the ability to guarantee purity and continuity for critical applications. Leading suppliers differentiate through investments in purification technologies, cylinder and cryogenic asset networks, and digital logistics platforms that enhance traceability and delivery precision. Many firms are expanding their value propositions beyond commodity supply to include on-site management, recovery systems, and customized service-level agreements that reduce operational risk for customers in sensitive industries.
Strategic partnerships and joint ventures have emerged as an effective mechanism to secure feedstock and expand regional fill capacities, particularly in regions where primary extraction is nascent or where air separation integration provides incremental supply. Companies that combine upstream access with downstream services create a competitive moat, allowing them to offer bundled solutions that address both technical and logistical pain points. Meanwhile, niche providers focused on ultra-high-purity grades or specialized cryogenic logistics compete on technical excellence and responsiveness, serving research laboratories, semiconductor fabs, and aerospace customers who cannot tolerate interruptions.
At the same time, market participants are investing in digitalization to improve cylinder tracking, optimize refill cycles, and forecast operational demand at the customer site. These capabilities reduce administrative friction and enhance contractual transparency, making long-term partnerships more attractive for both suppliers and buyers. Ultimately, firms that align technical depth with flexible commercial models and localized logistics are best positioned to capture premium engagements tied to mission-critical applications.
Industry leaders should pursue a pragmatic set of actions that strengthen supply assurance, reduce consumption intensity, and enhance commercial resilience. First, prioritize investments in helium reclamation and closed-loop systems at major points of use to lower dependency on external supply while improving sustainability profiles. Such investments should be paired with rigorous leak detection and recovery programs that reduce losses and extend the effective lifespan of procured volumes.
Second, diversify sourcing strategies by combining localized fill capabilities, recycled supply contracts, and selective long-term offtake agreements with technical performance clauses. This multifaceted approach reduces single-source exposure and aligns incentives across the value chain for reliability and service. Third, invest in purification and packaging capabilities to meet the increasing demands for high-purity and ultra-high-purity grades, while also developing flexible distribution models that accommodate both batch liquid deliveries and high-frequency gaseous replenishments.
Fourth, enhance contractual frameworks to include explicit service-level agreements, contingency provisions, and transparent pricing mechanisms that account for trade and tariff fluctuations. Fifth, develop collaborative R&D and pilot programs with major end users to optimize process designs that reduce helium intensity, capture and recycle streams, and validate substitution where technically feasible. Finally, build digital platforms for cylinder tracking, demand forecasting, and predictive maintenance that improve operational visibility and support data-driven procurement decisions. Collectively, these actions balance near-term supply security with longer-term efficiency and sustainability objectives.
The research approach combines primary engagement with industry practitioners, structured expert interviews, and technical validation of supply chain and product specifications to ensure rigor and relevance. Primary contacts included procurement leads, technical managers, and logistics coordinators who provided qualitative insights into consumption patterns, operational constraints, and service expectations. These discussions were complemented by consultations with technical specialists responsible for cryogenic handling, purification processes, and cylinder management to validate assumptions about grade requirements and point-of-use behaviors.
Secondary research encompassed a systematic review of publicly available technical publications, regulatory guidance, and industry association materials to establish a factual baseline for helium properties, handling best practices, and end-use normative standards. Cross-validation occurred through triangulation of primary interview findings with technical documentation and operational case studies, ensuring consistency between practitioner-reported behaviors and documented procedures. Data integrity was further reinforced through scenario analysis and sensitivity checks that examined plausible operational responses to supply disruptions, trade changes, and demand shifts.
Throughout the research process, emphasis was placed on transparency of assumptions, traceability of source material, and the applicability of findings across diverse industrial contexts. This methodology supports robust conclusions while allowing practitioners to adapt insights to their specific operational and strategic constraints.
The concluding synthesis emphasizes that helium occupies a unique strategic position: it is indispensable across several high-value industries, yet its supply is subject to specialized extraction, processing, and logistical constraints. Ensuring continuity requires a mix of technical investment, commercial innovation, and regional capacity development. Stakeholders that proactively invest in reclamation, localized fill and purification infrastructure, and stronger supplier partnerships will be better equipped to manage operational risks and capture strategic opportunities associated with advanced manufacturing and scientific applications.
Decision-makers should view helium management as an enterprise-level challenge that intersects procurement, engineering, and sustainability objectives. Coordinated initiatives that incorporate technical upgrades, contractual resilience, and digital visibility will produce more reliable outcomes than ad hoc procurement tactics. In addition, engaging in cooperative arrangements with suppliers and peers-such as shared recovery programs or regional fill investments-can mitigate the effects of trade disruptions and reduce exposure to concentrated extraction sources.
In summary, the pathway to increased resilience and competitiveness lies in aligning technical capabilities with commercial strategies, supported by targeted investments in recovery and localized logistics. By adopting these integrated measures, organizations can protect critical operations, improve cost predictability, and advance longer-term sustainability goals.