查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1856587

核子反应炉退役市场：按服务类型、计划阶段、核子反应炉类型、废弃物类型、所有者划分 - 全球预测 2025-2032

Nuclear Power Reactor Decommissioning Market by Service Type, Project Phase, Reactor Type, Waste Type, Ownership - Global Forecast 2025-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 186 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

预计到 2032 年，核子反应炉退役市场规模将达到 108.9 亿美元，年复合成长率为 16.08%。

关键市场统计数据
基准年 2024 33亿美元
预计年份：2025年 38.2亿美元
预测年份 2032 108.9亿美元
复合年增长率 (%) 16.08%

全面介绍现代除役环境，重点关注安全、不断变化的法规、劳动力动态和综合专案管治。

核能发电厂除役正从一项临时性活动转变为具有国家重要性的永久性项目，其驱动因素包括基础设施老化、管理体制不断演变以及公众对环境保护日益增长的期望。如今，相关人员面临着多重挑战：既要安全拆除设施，又要在日益严格的合规框架内管理放射性废弃物，还要修復场地以供未来生产性利用，同时还要与当地社区保持透明的沟通。这些现实情况对营运商、承包商、监管机构和投资者提出了新的要求，即在技术严谨性和计划高效管治之间取得平衡。

技术创新、不断演变的采购和资金筹措模式、监管协调以及劳动力转型如何再形成除役实践和结果

近年来，除役计划的构思、规划和执行方式发生了翻天覆地的变化。机器人技术、遥感探测和数位建模的进步，使得对受污染系统进行更精确的表征和製定更安全的干预策略成为可能，从而减少了工作人员的暴露风险，并实现了更废弃物分类。这些创新与拆除流程和原位修復技术的改进相辅相成，缩短了关键路径活动，并提高了结果的可预测性。

分析2025年关税环境如何重塑除役计画的供应链、筹资策略、国内采购和国际伙伴关係。

2025年推出的贸易政策变化对支持核子反应炉退役计划的全球供应链产生了显着的次生影响。进口重型设备、专用工具和某些工程部件的关税增加，提高了依赖跨境采购的计划投入成本，迫使专案方重新评估筹资策略和计划进度。因此，许多专案经理已启动供应商重新甄选流程和应急计划，以降低更高的到岸成本和更长的前置作业时间带来的风险。

细分市场主导的业务要务揭示了服务类型、计划阶段、核子反应炉技术、废弃物分类和所有权模式如何决定策略和资源分配。

深入了解服务类型、计划阶段、核子反应炉类型、废弃物流和所有权结构，对于建立整个退役专案的交付模式和资源分配至关重要。提供的服务包括：拆除和移除（可透过人工或机械方式进行）；规划和咨询服务，涵盖可行性研究到法规遵从策略；场地修復活动，包括土地恢復和景观美化；以及各种废弃物管理解决方案，从异地到场内处理。这些服务差异体现在计划生命週期的合约方式、安全通讯协定和技术选择。

区域性因素透过监管差异、工业能力差异以及对社区参与的期望，影响退役计画的实施。这些因素共同作用，塑造除役计画实施的进程。这些因素包括监管多样性、工业能力差异以及对社区参与的期望。

区域动态除役计画的规划和实施有显着影响，这体现在管理体制、工业产能、废弃物处理基础设施和公众舆论等方面的差异。在美洲，悠久的核能发电历史和完善的法律规范造就了高度的程序严谨性和丰富的机构知识，而具体场址的社会许可考虑和区域处置方案则影响着项目的进度安排和最终方案。跨境合作和北美供应链在重型设备和专业承包商的采购方面也发挥着重要作用。

透过技术专业化、综合服务和绩效驱动型合约创造竞争优势的企业策略和竞争模式

在除役生态系统中营运的公司透过技术专长、综合服务模式和策略伙伴关係关係脱颖而出，这些优势融合了工程、废弃物管理和环境修復等多个学科。领先企业正在投资于专用工具、机器人系统和数位化平台，以实现远端操作、优化拆卸流程并提高可追溯性，从而确保符合监管要求。这些能力通常与咨询服务相结合，以帮助企业应对复杂的授权要求和长期监管义务。

为业主和承包商提供切实可行的、优先的步骤，以加强其供应链，促进安全拆除，并交付获得监管机构和社区核准的计划。

行业领导者应采取一系列积极主动的措施，以增强专案韧性并提高执行确定性。首先，应优先投资模组化、远端和机器人技术，以减少工人暴露风险并加快高风险拆除作业的速度。技术投资应与严格的合格计画和供应商发展计画结合，以确保核级零件和工具的及时供应。

我们以证据为基础的研究途径结合了相关人员访谈、技术领域检验、监管审查和专家小组检验，以确保获得可操作的洞见。

本研究采用的调查方法结合了主要利害关係人参与、系统性文献回顾和技术检验，以确保研究结果基于实证且具有实际应用价值。主要资料收集包括对营运商、监管机构、退役相关人员、废弃物处理机构和技术供应商进行结构化访谈，以深入了解实际操作并突出新兴的最佳实践。现场考察和技术巡视是访谈的补充，检验实际退役环境中的运作限制和设备使用。

最终结果凸显了专案成功需要整合专案管治、增强供应链韧性、推广技术应用以及持续的相关人员参与。

核子反应炉的有效除役不仅仅是技术上的执行，还需要全面的专案管治、灵活的采购方式以及相关人员的持续参与。贯穿所有服务线、计划阶段、核子反应炉类型、废弃物类别和所有权模式的共同点是，需要进行通用规划，使技术能力与监管承诺和社区期望保持一致。技术创新和不断变化的采购格局为提高安全性和效率提供了机会，但这些成果取决于严格的供应商管理和对员工能力的持续投入。

目录

第一章：序言

第二章调查方法

第三章执行摘要

第四章 市场概览

第五章 市场洞察

  • 放射性废弃物处理领域对先进机器人系统的需求日益增长
  • 加速将核子反应炉厂址转移到棕地或待开发区再开发策略
  • 运用数位双胞胎技术优化除役计划时间表
  • 对永续、低碳拆除流程的监管压力日益增大
  • 扩大国际合作，共用核能发电厂退役的最佳实践
  • 扩展远端监测和人工智慧驱动的分析以进行核子反应炉安全评估

第六章：美国关税的累积影响，2025年

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

第八章 按服务类型分類的核子反应炉退役市场

  • 拆除/移除
    • 手动拆卸
    • 机器拆卸
  • 规划与咨询
    • 可行性研究
    • 监理合规
  • 场地维修
    • 土地修復
    • 环境修復
  • 废弃物管理
    • 异地处理
    • 现场处理

第九章 依计划阶段分類的核子反应炉退役市场

  • 去污
  • 拆卸
  • 退役后监测
  • 场地维修
  • 废弃物处理

第十章 依核子反应炉类型分類的核子反应炉退役市场

  • 沸水式反应炉
  • 快滋生式反应炉
  • 气冷反应器
  • 重水反应器
  • 压水式反应炉

第十一章 按废弃物类型分類的核子反应炉退役市场

  • 高放射性废弃物
  • 中级废弃物
  • 低放射性废弃物

第十二章核子反应炉退役市场

  • 国有
  • 私人

第十三章 各地区核子反应炉退役市场

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

第十四章核子反应炉退役市场：依组别划分

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第十五章 各国核子反应炉退役市场

  • 美国
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

第十六章 竞争格局

  • 2024年市占率分析
  • FPNV定位矩阵，2024
  • 竞争分析
    • Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
    • Fluor Corporation
    • AECOM
    • Bechtel Corporation
    • SNC-Lavalin Group Inc.
    • Tetra Tech, Inc.
    • Orano SA
    • Westinghouse Electric Company LLC
    • Babcock International Group PLC
    • Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.
Product Code: MRR-742BD5182230

The Nuclear Power Reactor Decommissioning Market is projected to grow by USD 10.89 billion at a CAGR of 16.08% by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 3.30 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 3.82 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 10.89 billion
CAGR (%) 16.08%

A comprehensive orientation to the contemporary decommissioning environment highlighting safety, regulatory evolution, workforce dynamics, and integrated program governance

The decommissioning of nuclear power reactors is transitioning from an episodic activity into an enduring program of national significance, driven by a convergence of aging infrastructure, evolving regulatory regimes, and heightened public expectations for environmental stewardship. Stakeholders now face a multifaceted challenge: to retire facilities safely, to manage radioactive wastes within stricter compliance windows, and to restore sites for future productive use while maintaining transparent engagement with communities. These realities place new demands on operators, contractors, regulators, and investors to harmonize technical rigor with efficient project governance.

Against this backdrop, pragmatic planning and adaptive execution are paramount. The introduction of advanced remote systems, refined radiological characterization techniques, and more systematic waste segregation is changing how teams scope and sequence decommissioning tasks. At the same time, regulatory frameworks are becoming more prescriptive in areas such as long-term surveillance, waste transport, and end-state land use. Consequently, planning now extends well beyond shutdown to encompass legacy liabilities, long-duration surveillance obligations, and the social license required for site redevelopment.

Transitioning from concept to deliverable requires robust interdisciplinary coordination. Engineering assessments must be integrated with regulatory strategy, community outreach, and financing structures. Moreover, workforce planning and knowledge transfer are increasingly central as experienced personnel retire and new skillsets are required. In sum, the introduction to this sector underscores an imperative: decommissioning must be managed as a strategic national program that balances safety, cost-effectiveness, and social accountability.

How technological innovation, evolving procurement and financing models, regulatory harmonization, and workforce transitions are reshaping decommissioning practice and outcomes

Recent years have witnessed transformative shifts that are redefining how decommissioning projects are conceived, planned, and executed. Technological advances in robotics, remote sensing, and digital modeling now permit more precise characterization of contaminated systems and safer intervention strategies, thereby reducing personnel exposure and enabling more granular waste segregation. These innovations are complemented by process improvements in dismantling sequences and site restoration techniques that shorten critical path activities and improve predictability of outcomes.

Concurrently, procurement and contracting models are evolving. Collaborative contractual structures and performance-based incentives encourage contractors to assume greater end-to-end responsibility, aligning commercial interests with long-term stewardship objectives. Financing instruments are also adapting; blended public-private arrangements and long-term liability funding mechanisms are becoming more common, which serves to de-risk projects and catalyze private-sector participation.

Regulatory transformation is another pivotal shift. Agencies are increasingly focused on harmonizing standards across jurisdictions, improving transparency of decommissioning milestones, and specifying robust post-closure surveillance requirements. This regulatory tightening is prompting earlier and more detailed engagement between operators and regulators, which reduces surprises during execution. Finally, the talent pipeline is shifting: aging workforces and the emergence of new technical domains require targeted training programs and knowledge-transfer initiatives to preserve institutional memory. Together, these shifts create a new operational paradigm-one in which integrated systems, multidisciplinary teams, and adaptive management approaches define successful outcomes.

Analysis of how the 2025 tariff environment has recalibrated supply chains, procurement strategies, domestic sourcing, and international partnerships in decommissioning programs

Trade policy changes introduced in 2025 have produced tangible second-order effects across global supply chains that support reactor decommissioning projects. Tariff measures affecting imported heavy equipment, specialized tooling, and certain engineered components have increased input costs for projects reliant on cross-border procurement, thereby creating pressure to reassess sourcing strategies and project schedules. As a result, many program managers have initiated supplier requalification processes and contingency planning to mitigate exposure to higher landed costs and longer lead times.

In response, one observable adaptation has been accelerated engagement with domestic manufacturers and fabricators. While domestic substitution can reduce tariff risk, it often requires qualification cycles to ensure that alternative suppliers meet nuclear-grade standards, which can introduce near-term schedule risk. Similarly, tariffs have catalyzed more strategic inventory planning and earlier procurement windows to hedge against uncertain trade conditions. These procurement adjustments have implications for capital allocation and for contract structuring, with greater emphasis on fixed-price or cost-sharing arrangements to allocate tariff-related risk.

Moreover, tariffs influence international collaboration on technology transfer and joint ventures. Some international vendors are restructuring their supply footprints by localizing assembly or partnering with domestic firms to preserve market access. Regulatory bodies and project owners are therefore placing a heightened focus on supplier audits, quality assurance, and traceability, ensuring that changes in supply chain architecture do not compromise safety or compliance. Taken together, the cumulative impact of the 2025 tariff environment is prompting a recalibration of sourcing strategies, contract terms, and cross-border partnerships to sustain program continuity and to protect long-term stewardship objectives.

Segment-driven operational imperatives revealing how service types, project phases, reactor technologies, waste categorizations, and ownership models determine strategy and resource allocation

A granular understanding of service types, project phases, reactor varieties, waste streams, and ownership structures is essential for shaping delivery models and resource allocation across decommissioning portfolios. Service offerings encompass dismantling and demolition-executed through either manual dismantling or mechanical dismantling-planning and consulting services that span feasibility studies to regulatory compliance strategy, site restoration activities that include land remediation and landscaping, and waste management solutions that range from offsite treatment to onsite treatment. These service distinctions inform contracting approaches, safety protocols, and technology selection throughout the project lifecycle.

Project phases further refine program sequencing, beginning with decontamination activities to reduce radiological inventories, followed by dismantling tasks, then post-decommissioning surveillance to ensure long-term safety, site restoration to meet envisioned land uses, and waste processing to condition and package material for transport or disposal. Each phase has distinct technical requirements and regulatory checkpoints, which necessitates tailored workforce competencies and quality assurance processes.

Reactor technology also drives technical strategy. Decommissioning approaches vary across boiling water reactors, fast breeder reactors, gas cooled reactors, heavy water reactors, and pressurized water reactors due to differences in design, material inventories, and radiological profiles. Waste categorization into high level, intermediate level, and low level streams further dictates handling protocols, treatment pathways, and storage arrangements. Finally, ownership models-whether government owned or private owned-shape governance frameworks, funding mechanisms, and risk allocation. Public ownership frequently emphasizes national liability management and long-term stewardship, whereas private ownership often prioritizes efficiency and commercial closure conditions. Integrating these segmentation lenses supports more precise project scoping, risk management, and capability development.

Regional dynamics that shape decommissioning program execution through regulatory diversity, industrial capacity differences, and community engagement expectations

Regional dynamics materially influence how decommissioning programs are planned and implemented, reflecting differences in regulatory regimes, industrial capacity, waste disposal infrastructure, and public sentiment. In the Americas, long histories of nuclear generation combined with established regulatory frameworks contribute to a high degree of procedural rigor and institutional knowledge, while site-specific social license considerations and regional disposal options shape program timelines and end-state planning. Cross-border cooperation and North American supply chains also play a role in sourcing heavy equipment and specialized contractors.

In Europe, Middle East & Africa, the regulatory environment is diverse, with mature decommissioning programs in some European nations coexisting alongside emerging frameworks in other parts of the region. This heterogeneity necessitates adaptable technical standards and frequent regulatory dialogue. In many jurisdictions within this region, strong public engagement mechanisms and environmental remediation requirements place additional emphasis on transparent community consultation and on restoring land for alternate uses.

Across Asia-Pacific, growth in reactor installations over recent decades has produced a concentration of decommissioning activity as older units retire. The region exhibits rapid adoption of advanced dismantling technologies and a pragmatic approach to public-private partnerships to mobilize funding and technical expertise. Variations in waste disposal infrastructure and local manufacturing capabilities influence whether programs prioritize localization of supply or rely on regional procurement networks. In all regions, the interplay between regulatory certainty, industrial capability, and social acceptance determines the pace and character of decommissioning efforts.

Corporate strategies and collaborative models that create competitive advantage through technical specialization, integrated services, and performance-oriented contracting

Companies operating in the decommissioning ecosystem are distinguishing themselves through a combination of technical specialization, integrated service models, and strategic partnerships that bridge engineering, waste management, and environmental remediation domains. Leading firms are investing in purpose-built tooling, robotic systems, and digital platforms that enable remote operations, optimize dismantling sequences, and improve traceability for regulatory compliance. These capabilities are frequently coupled with advisory services that help clients navigate complex permitting requirements and long-term surveillance obligations.

Strategic collaboration is a clear differentiator. Firms that pursue joint ventures and alliances with local contractors, technology providers, and logistics specialists can access new markets more rapidly while sharing technical risk. Similarly, companies that offer end-to-end solutions-from radiological characterization and decontamination to waste processing and site restoration-can capture synergies that reduce interfaces and streamline project governance. Talent strategies also matter: organizations that invest in training pipelines, apprenticeships, and knowledge transfer programs are better positioned to retain institutional expertise and to scale complex projects across multiple geographies.

From a commercial standpoint, performance-based contracting and outcome-linked service agreements are increasingly common as owners seek to align incentives with long-term stewardship objectives. Firms that demonstrate rigorous quality assurance, robust supply chain controls, and transparent reporting practices tend to build stronger regulatory and community trust, which in turn reduces friction during execution and supports reputational resilience over multi-decade decommissioning horizons.

Practical and prioritized steps for owners and contractors to strengthen supply chains, accelerate safe dismantling, and secure regulatory and community approval for projects

Industry leaders should adopt a proactive portfolio of measures to strengthen program resilience and to improve execution certainty. First, prioritize investment in modular, remote, and robotics technologies that reduce worker exposure and increase the pace of high-risk dismantling tasks. Pair technology investments with rigorous qualification programs and supplier development initiatives to ensure timely availability of nuclear-grade components and tooling.

Second, reshape procurement strategies to mitigate trade policy and supply chain risk. This includes diversifying supplier bases, accelerating long-lead procurement windows, and negotiating contract terms that share tariff-related exposures between owners and vendors. Where feasible, cultivate strategic partnerships with domestic fabricators to shorten supply chains while maintaining compliance and quality assurance standards.

Third, engage early and constructively with regulators and community stakeholders. Transparent planning, staged communication of safety cases, and demonstrable remediation commitments reduce public uncertainty and can expedite permitting cycles. Simultaneously, develop workforce transition programs that capture retiring expertise and train the next generation across radiological control, remote systems operation, and project management disciplines.

Finally, implement governance structures that integrate technical, regulatory, and commercial decision-making. Cross-functional program teams with clear accountability for risk registers, schedule fidelity, and stakeholder engagement can improve alignment and reduce cost-producing change orders. Together, these actions create a resilient operational framework capable of delivering safe, compliant, and socially responsible decommissioning outcomes.

An evidence-based research approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical site validation, regulatory review, and expert panel validation to ensure actionable insights

The underlying research methodology combines primary stakeholder engagement, systematic document review, and technical validation to ensure the findings are evidence-based and operationally relevant. Primary data collection included structured interviews with operators, regulators, decommissioning contractors, waste disposal authorities, and technology vendors to capture real-world execution insights and to surface emerging best practices. Site visits and technical walkdowns supplemented interviews, enabling validation of operational constraints and verification of equipment usage in active decommissioning environments.

Secondary research encompassed comprehensive review of regulatory frameworks, scientific literature, reference standards, and publicly available project documentation to build a robust contextual foundation. This review informed detailed technical analyses, including assessment of decontamination techniques, dismantling methods, and waste conditioning pathways. Triangulation between primary and secondary sources ensured that conclusions are consistent with operational realities and regulatory expectations.

Analytical rigor was maintained through expert panel reviews and quality assurance processes, which included scenario analysis to test the robustness of strategic recommendations under varying procurement, regulatory, and technology adoption conditions. Data integrity checks and source traceability protocols were applied throughout the research lifecycle to ensure reproducibility and transparency of the conclusions offered to program leaders and policy makers.

A decisive synthesis underscoring the need for integrated program governance, supply chain resilience, technology adoption, and sustained stakeholder engagement for success

Effective decommissioning of nuclear power reactors requires more than technical execution; it demands integrated program governance, adaptive procurement, and enduring stakeholder engagement. Across service lines, project phases, reactor types, waste categories, and ownership models, the common thread is the need for coordinated planning that aligns technical capabilities with regulatory commitments and community expectations. Technological innovation and changing procurement dynamics present opportunities to improve safety and efficiency, yet these gains depend on disciplined supplier management and sustained investment in workforce competencies.

Policy shifts and trade measures have underscored the importance of supply chain resilience and strategic sourcing, prompting owners and contractors to reassess vendor qualifications and to develop contingency arrangements. Regionally, the differences in regulatory maturity and industrial capacity require tailored approaches that reflect local disposal infrastructures and public sentiment. Companies that combine integrated service offerings with transparent reporting and strong quality assurance will be best positioned to navigate the complexity of multi-decade decommissioning obligations.

In closing, leaders should treat decommissioning as a strategic long-term program that balances technical excellence with social accountability. Thoughtful alignment of technology, procurement, regulatory engagement, and talent development will determine which programs achieve safe, timely, and socially accepted outcomes.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Rising demand for advanced robotic systems in radiological waste handling
  • 5.2. Accelerating transfer of reactor sites to brownfield or greenfield land redevelopment strategies
  • 5.3. Implementation of digital twin technology to optimize decommissioning project timelines
  • 5.4. Increasing regulatory pressure for sustainable low carbon dismantling processes
  • 5.5. Growth in international collaborations for sharing best practices in nuclear plant decommissioning
  • 5.6. Expansion of remote monitoring and AI driven analytics for reactor safety assessments

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Nuclear Power Reactor Decommissioning Market, by Service Type

  • 8.1. Dismantling & Demolition
    • 8.1.1. Manual Dismantling
    • 8.1.2. Mechanical Dismantling
  • 8.2. Planning & Consulting
    • 8.2.1. Feasibility Study
    • 8.2.2. Regulatory Compliance
  • 8.3. Site Restoration
    • 8.3.1. Land Remediation
    • 8.3.2. Landscaping
  • 8.4. Waste Management
    • 8.4.1. Offsite Treatment
    • 8.4.2. Onsite Treatment

9. Nuclear Power Reactor Decommissioning Market, by Project Phase

  • 9.1. Decontamination
  • 9.2. Dismantling
  • 9.3. Post Decommissioning Surveillance
  • 9.4. Site Restoration
  • 9.5. Waste Processing

10. Nuclear Power Reactor Decommissioning Market, by Reactor Type

  • 10.1. Boiling Water Reactor
  • 10.2. Fast Breeder Reactor
  • 10.3. Gas Cooled Reactor
  • 10.4. Heavy Water Reactor
  • 10.5. Pressurized Water Reactor

11. Nuclear Power Reactor Decommissioning Market, by Waste Type

  • 11.1. High Level Waste
  • 11.2. Intermediate Level Waste
  • 11.3. Low Level Waste

12. Nuclear Power Reactor Decommissioning Market, by Ownership

  • 12.1. Government Owned
  • 12.2. Private Owned

13. Nuclear Power Reactor Decommissioning Market, by Region

  • 13.1. Americas
    • 13.1.1. North America
    • 13.1.2. Latin America
  • 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 13.2.1. Europe
    • 13.2.2. Middle East
    • 13.2.3. Africa
  • 13.3. Asia-Pacific

14. Nuclear Power Reactor Decommissioning Market, by Group

  • 14.1. ASEAN
  • 14.2. GCC
  • 14.3. European Union
  • 14.4. BRICS
  • 14.5. G7
  • 14.6. NATO

15. Nuclear Power Reactor Decommissioning Market, by Country

  • 15.1. United States
  • 15.2. Canada
  • 15.3. Mexico
  • 15.4. Brazil
  • 15.5. United Kingdom
  • 15.6. Germany
  • 15.7. France
  • 15.8. Russia
  • 15.9. Italy
  • 15.10. Spain
  • 15.11. China
  • 15.12. India
  • 15.13. Japan
  • 15.14. Australia
  • 15.15. South Korea

16. Competitive Landscape

  • 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 16.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 16.3.1. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
    • 16.3.2. Fluor Corporation
    • 16.3.3. AECOM
    • 16.3.4. Bechtel Corporation
    • 16.3.5. SNC-Lavalin Group Inc.
    • 16.3.6. Tetra Tech, Inc.
    • 16.3.7. Orano SA
    • 16.3.8. Westinghouse Electric Company LLC
    • 16.3.9. Babcock International Group PLC
    • 16.3.10. Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNERSHIP, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 11. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNERSHIP, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 13. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 14. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 15. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 16. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 17. EUROPE NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 18. MIDDLE EAST NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 19. AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 20. ASIA-PACIFIC NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 21. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 22. ASEAN NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 23. GCC NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 24. EUROPEAN UNION NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 25. BRICS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 26. G7 NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 27. NATO NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 28. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 29. NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2024
  • FIGURE 30. NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2024

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SEGMENTATION & COVERAGE
  • TABLE 2. UNITED STATES DOLLAR EXCHANGE RATE, 2018-2024
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MANUAL DISMANTLING, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MANUAL DISMANTLING, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MANUAL DISMANTLING, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MANUAL DISMANTLING, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MANUAL DISMANTLING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MANUAL DISMANTLING, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANICAL DISMANTLING, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANICAL DISMANTLING, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANICAL DISMANTLING, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANICAL DISMANTLING, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANICAL DISMANTLING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANICAL DISMANTLING, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FEASIBILITY STUDY, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FEASIBILITY STUDY, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FEASIBILITY STUDY, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FEASIBILITY STUDY, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FEASIBILITY STUDY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FEASIBILITY STUDY, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REGULATORY COMPLIANCE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REGULATORY COMPLIANCE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REGULATORY COMPLIANCE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REGULATORY COMPLIANCE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REGULATORY COMPLIANCE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REGULATORY COMPLIANCE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LAND REMEDIATION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LAND REMEDIATION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LAND REMEDIATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LAND REMEDIATION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LAND REMEDIATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LAND REMEDIATION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LANDSCAPING, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LANDSCAPING, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LANDSCAPING, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LANDSCAPING, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LANDSCAPING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LANDSCAPING, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OFFSITE TREATMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OFFSITE TREATMENT, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OFFSITE TREATMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OFFSITE TREATMENT, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OFFSITE TREATMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OFFSITE TREATMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ONSITE TREATMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ONSITE TREATMENT, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ONSITE TREATMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ONSITE TREATMENT, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ONSITE TREATMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ONSITE TREATMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DECONTAMINATION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DECONTAMINATION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DECONTAMINATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DECONTAMINATION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DECONTAMINATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DECONTAMINATION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY POST DECOMMISSIONING SURVEILLANCE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY POST DECOMMISSIONING SURVEILLANCE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY POST DECOMMISSIONING SURVEILLANCE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY POST DECOMMISSIONING SURVEILLANCE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY POST DECOMMISSIONING SURVEILLANCE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY POST DECOMMISSIONING SURVEILLANCE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE PROCESSING, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE PROCESSING, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE PROCESSING, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE PROCESSING, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE PROCESSING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE PROCESSING, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY BOILING WATER REACTOR, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY BOILING WATER REACTOR, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY BOILING WATER REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY BOILING WATER REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY BOILING WATER REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY BOILING WATER REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FAST BREEDER REACTOR, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FAST BREEDER REACTOR, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FAST BREEDER REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FAST BREEDER REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FAST BREEDER REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FAST BREEDER REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GAS COOLED REACTOR, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GAS COOLED REACTOR, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GAS COOLED REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GAS COOLED REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GAS COOLED REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GAS COOLED REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HEAVY WATER REACTOR, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HEAVY WATER REACTOR, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HEAVY WATER REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HEAVY WATER REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HEAVY WATER REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HEAVY WATER REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH LEVEL WASTE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH LEVEL WASTE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH LEVEL WASTE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH LEVEL WASTE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH LEVEL WASTE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH LEVEL WASTE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMEDIATE LEVEL WASTE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMEDIATE LEVEL WASTE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMEDIATE LEVEL WASTE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMEDIATE LEVEL WASTE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMEDIATE LEVEL WASTE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMEDIATE LEVEL WASTE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LOW LEVEL WASTE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LOW LEVEL WASTE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LOW LEVEL WASTE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LOW LEVEL WASTE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LOW LEVEL WASTE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY LOW LEVEL WASTE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNERSHIP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNERSHIP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT OWNED, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT OWNED, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT OWNED, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT OWNED, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT OWNED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT OWNED, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRIVATE OWNED, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRIVATE OWNED, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRIVATE OWNED, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRIVATE OWNED, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRIVATE OWNED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRIVATE OWNED, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. GLOBAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 200. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 201. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 202. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 203. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 204. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 205. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNERSHIP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 206. AMERICAS NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNERSHIP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 207. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 208. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 209. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 210. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 211. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 212. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 213. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 214. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 215. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 216. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 217. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 218. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 219. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 220. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 221. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 222. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 223. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 224. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 225. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNERSHIP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 226. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNERSHIP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 227. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 228. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 229. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 230. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 231. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 232. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 233. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 234. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 235. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 236. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 237. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 238. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 239. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 240. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 241. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 242. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 243. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 244. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 245. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNERSHIP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 246. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNERSHIP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 247. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 248. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 249. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 250. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 251. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 252. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING & DEMOLITION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 253. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 254. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PLANNING & CONSULTING, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 255. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 256. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SITE RESTORATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 257. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 258. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 259. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 260. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT PHASE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 261. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 262. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 263. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 264. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 265. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNERSHIP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 266. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY OWN