![]() |
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1861714
互联企业市场:2025-2032 年全球预测(按组件、部署类型、组织规模、产业和连接类型划分)Connected Enterprise Market by Component, Deployment Mode, Organization Size, Industry Vertical, Connectivity Type - Global Forecast 2025-2032 |
||||||
※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。
预计到 2032 年,互联企业市场将成长至 9,691.7 亿美元,复合年增长率为 19.56%。
| 关键市场统计数据 | |
|---|---|
| 基准年 2024 | 2321亿美元 |
| 预计年份:2025年 | 2776.1亿美元 |
| 预测年份 2032 | 9691.7亿美元 |
| 复合年增长率 (%) | 19.56% |
互联企业标誌着组织将数位化可能性转化为实际营运方式的转捩点。在资料流增强、操作技术与资讯系统更紧密整合以及客户期望不断变化等因素的驱动下,组织如今面临着双重挑战:既要加速数位倡议,又要确保供应炼和关键基础设施的韧性。领导者必须协调传统架构与云端原生范式,在日益分散的环境中嵌入安全措施,并培养内部能力,以从整合系统中持续挖掘价值。
在此背景下,转型并非一次性项目,而是一项涵盖策略、技术、人才和管治的持续性能力提升。成功的组织将资料视为营运资产,优先考虑互通性,并采用模组化架构以减少创新阻力。在追求这些目标的过程中,企业需要在控制与敏捷性、集中管治与分散授权、短期效率提升与长期韧性之间做出权衡。本分析透过阐明策略驱动因素、生态系统动态和切实可行的槓桿,为决策者指明了方向,这些因素将决定哪些组织能够将互联互通转化为竞争优势。
数位基础设施和营运格局正沿着多个方向转变,重塑企业的经济模式和架构。边缘运算和即时分析技术的进步使得本地决策成为可能,从而降低延迟并节省频宽;同时,云端原生模式不断加速开发週期,并促进可组合服务的形成。此外,无所不在的无线连接和5G私有网路的成熟,在分散式资产和集中式编配层之间建立了确定性的连接,从而催生了新一代的工业自动化和客户体验。
安全性和隐私性考量与功能性需求同等重要,这要求架构必须融入零信任原则和持续检验。同时,永续性和合规性正日益影响采购和生命週期选择,推动耐用且节能的部署。劳动力结构的演变也是一个关键的转捩点,企业现在需要兼具技术专长、资料素养和系统工程能力的多学科人才。总而言之,这些趋势正迫使企业采取适应性策略,在快速试验和严格的营运控制之间取得平衡,从而改变能力从先导计画扩展到业务关键型系统的方式。
美国2025年实施的关税政策,影响远不止于名义关税税率,而是涉及采购惯例、供应商关係和产品设计等多个层面。关税风险的增加推高了某些零件和成品的到岸成本,迫使采购部门重新评估供应商所在地,选择替代采购途径,并更加关注整体拥有成本。为此,许多企业正在加速近岸外包,并实现供应商组合多元化,以降低集中风险并缩短补货週期。
在战术层面,企业正采取多种缓解策略,包括重新设计材料清单(BOM)以使用享受关税优惠的组件、实施合法的税务规划以及扩大保税物流安排的使用范围,以延缓关税的影响。关税归类、估价和原产地证书文件的准确性要求不断提高,导致监管合规成本上升,促使企业投资于贸易合规自动化和专业人才。各行业受到的影响并不均衡。资本密集型製造业和大批量电子产品产业的供应链经历了显着调整,而服务型产业虽然直接受到的关税影响有限,但却因供应商价格和物流成本的上涨而面临间接影响。
此外,关税政策的变化也改变了国内製造业产能投资决策的基础。政策主导的激励措施和成本结构的转变,在某些情况下使得在地化生产和组装更具吸引力,促使企业调整长期筹资策略。贸易伙伴的政策因应措施以及替代性自由贸易协定的出现,增加了复杂性,迫使企业建立多种情境模型,并优先考虑合约和库存政策的灵活性。整体而言,这些累积效应提升了企业业务议程中韧性和策略采购的重要性,使考虑关税因素的供应链设计成为一种可持续的能力,而非权宜之计。
要了解需求和采用情况,需要从精细的细分观点,反映企业如何购买和实施互联企业解决方案。从组件维度来看,市场分为“服务”和“解决方案”,服务进一步细分为“託管服务”和“专业服务”。这种区分至关重要,因为持续的託管服务和有时限的专业计划具有截然不同的消费模式和长期关係动态。因此,企业在优先考虑业务连续性时往往倾向于选择託管服务,而专业服务则是实现特定转型倡议和加速发展的有效途径。
部署模式也是一个重要的细分维度。云端和本地部署方式并存,云端部署又分为混合云端、私有云端和公共云端三种形式。每种部署选项都反映了在延迟、资料主权、成本可预测性和整合复杂性方面的权衡。混合云端模式对那些需要在集中式分析和本地控制之间紧密结合的组织尤其具有吸引力。私有云端更受那些对合规性要求严格的组织的青睐,而公共云端则为对合规性要求不高的工作负载提供了快速扩展能力。
组织规模也会影响采购行为。大型企业倾向于选择整合平台和企业级支援模式,而中小企业则优先考虑快速实现价值、模组化定价以及能够最大限度减少内部负担的预先整合解决方案。产业细分进一步区分了需求:银行、金融服务和保险业需要先进的安全性和合规性整合;能源和公共产业则优先考虑电网弹性和长生命週期支援;政府和国防产业强调身分验证和自主解决方案;医疗保健和生命科学产业优先互通性隐私保护和临床系统整合;在製造业内部,离散製造和流程製造对控制系统整合和批次/单元可追溯性有不同的要求。
连接方式的分类区分了有线和无线两种方案。有线连接又分为乙太网路和光纤,为固定安装提供稳定、高吞吐量的通道。而无线连线则涵盖蜂窝网路、低功耗广域网路 (LPWAN) 和 Wi-Fi,支援行动性、远端遥测和低功率广域网路应用场景。连接方式的选择通常取决于运作环境、频宽需求和总体拥有成本 (TCO),这些因素会影响边缘运算、资料撷取和装置生命週期管理的架构选择。这些相互交织的要素共同构成了能力蓝图、采购标准和合作伙伴生态系统,为市场推广策略和产品蓝图提供了结构基础。
区域趋势对策略和执行有显着影响,因为不同地区的政策、基础设施成熟度和客户期望各不相同。美洲地区的特点是大力推动数位转型、积极进行私人投资,并专注于近岸外包以减少供应链延误。监管机构对资料保护和特定产业的关注影响着部署选择,云端优先策略在技术采用者中较为普遍,而混合或本地部署架构仍然是关键基础架构专案的首选。
欧洲、中东和非洲地区(EMEA)监管的复杂性和跨境互通性既带来了挑战,也带来了机会。资料居住法、能源转型倡议以及多元化的通讯环境要求解决方案必须具备灵活性和合规性。公共和私营部门对弹性基础设施的投资正在影响采购优先事项,而与本地系统整合商和通讯业者伙伴关係对于满足区域营运和监管要求至关重要。
亚太地区持续快速变化且多元化,製造业群林立,5G和专用无线网路正在积极普及,对自动化和智慧製造应用案例的需求强劲。管理体制、产业政策和本地供应商生态系统的差异意味着打入市场策略必须因地制宜。快速的都市化、大规模的产业现代化项目以及不断壮大的人才队伍,使该地区成为新部署和大规模现代化改造的重点区域。在所有地区,地缘政治格局的变化、供应链重组和区域激励措施都在影响企业在互联互通基础设施投资方面的优先顺序和方式。
领先的供应商和系统整合商在平台广度、产业专长和服务交付模式等方面竞争,而成功的公司往往能够将产品蓝图与实际营运成果紧密结合。优先考虑互通性和开放标准的供应商能够减少整合摩擦,并提高在复杂企业环境中的订单率。同时,将强大的託管服务与产业专用的加速器结合的供应商,能够为需要快速大规模部署试点专案的客户创造差异化价值。
策略伙伴关係和生态系统建构至关重要。与连接供应商、硬体供应商和专业整合商建立联盟的技术提供者可以提供端到端的价值提案,从而简化采购并加速部署。投资能源系统工程师和製造流程专家等专业领域,使供应商能够超越通用能力,满足特定产业需求。此外,将供应商奖励与客户成果挂钩的定价模式,例如绩效保证型契约和託管服务订阅,正受到寻求可预测营运成本和可衡量回报的企业的青睐。
卓越的营运同样至关重要。那些能够简化部署生命週期、为旧有系统提供清晰迁移路径并保持强大的部署后支援的公司,能够获得更高的生命週期价值。人员与组织的协调一致仍是致胜的关键。将产品管理、安全和服务工程整合到整合交付团队中的公司,能够加速创新并缩短客户实现价值所需的时间。简而言之,能够将技术深度与行业洞察力相结合,并将复杂的功能堆迭转化为简单、以结果为导向的服务的公司,以获得竞争优势。
产业领导者应优先采取能够将策略意图转化为营运能力的高影响力行动。首先,透过供应商多元化、提高下游组件的透明度以及建立灵活的库存策略来增强供应链韧性。将合约弹性与情境规划相结合,使采购部门能够随着贸易和关税环境的变化而快速回应。其次,针对对延迟敏感或高度监管的工作负载,采用混合部署模式,将云端的敏捷性与本地环境的控制力结合,从而创建清晰的迁移路径,在实现现代化的同时保护现有投资。
第三,我们将把安全性和合规性融入解决方案开发和部署的各个阶段。投资于零信任架构、持续监控和自动化合规工作流程,将有助于快速创新并降低风险。第四,我们将制定分层连接策略,根据应用需求选择最佳传输机制。对于吞吐量需求高的区域,我们将采用有线骨干网路;对于分散式遥测和行动应用,我们将混合使用蜂窝网路、低功耗广域网路 (LPWAN) 和 Wi-Fi 网路。第五,我们将透过有针对性的技能提升计画和跨学科团队,加速员工发展。这些团队将汇集资料工程和系统结构的专业知识。我们将建立轮调制度,以促进人才保留和知识转移。
第六,推行以合作主导的市场推广模式,将平台永续性和生命週期成本纳入采购标准,优先考虑节能架构和长期维护计画。最后,透过管治框架将持续学习制度化,该框架能够总结试点经验教训,推广最佳实践,并将技术投资与可衡量的营运关键绩效指标 (KPI) 挂钩。这些措施共同构成了一个切实可行的蓝图,将策略重点转化为永续的营运优势。
本分析背后的研究采用了混合方法,旨在兼顾深入洞察与实践检验。主要研究包括对高阶主管、采购人员、系统架构师和领域专家进行结构化访谈,以收集有关实施挑战、供应商趋势和监管影响的第一手资料。此外,还透过审查技术规范、标准化文件和公开实施案例,对这些定性资料进行补充,以用可验证的实践来佐证结论。
我们的二手研究系统地汇总了公开报告、行业蓝图和监管指南,以确定背景并识别跨行业模式。资料三角验证法用于协调不同资讯来源之间的差异,情境分析则用于模拟政策变化(例如关税调整)的营运影响。我们透过与从业人员研讨会来检验细分框架,以确保组件、实施类型、组织、行业和连接方式之间的差异能够反映实际的采购决策。
为确保研究的严谨性,研究结果由独立的专业技术负责人进行最后覆核,并透过迭代回馈循环不断改进。此调查方法承认其局限性,例如不同地区数据透明度的差异以及不断变化的法规环境,并鼓励定期更新,以反映新兴的政策趋势、技术进步和供应链变化。总体而言,该方法强调可复製性、实践检验以及专注于支援战略决策的可操作性结论。
在互联互通加速发展、政策趋势不断演变、营运日益复杂的环境下,将韧性、互通性和结果导向融入策略的组织将获得持续的竞争优势。转型需要的不仅是技术选择,还需要对管治、采购、人才和供应商关係进行变革,才能将实验性倡议扩展为可靠的营运模式。关税、区域政策和技术成熟度之间的相互作用凸显了灵活的采购和架构实践的重要性,这些实践能够适应不断变化的外部环境。
经营团队必须将短期战术性措施与长期能力建设相结合,优先考虑能够促进创新并降低营运风险的投资。透过聚焦混合部署模式、安全设计、多元化的连接策略和产业专用的解决方案,领导者可以加速价值创造并最大限度地减少中断。最终,那些将互联企业视为持续能力而非一次性计划的组织,将更有能力充分利用技术进步,并抵御地缘政治和经济逆风。
The Connected Enterprise Market is projected to grow by USD 969.17 billion at a CAGR of 19.56% by 2032.
| KEY MARKET STATISTICS | |
|---|---|
| Base Year [2024] | USD 232.10 billion |
| Estimated Year [2025] | USD 277.61 billion |
| Forecast Year [2032] | USD 969.17 billion |
| CAGR (%) | 19.56% |
The connected enterprise represents an inflection point in how organizations convert digital potential into operational reality. Driven by intensified data flows, tighter integration of operational technology and information systems, and evolving customer expectations, organizations now face a dual mandate: accelerate digital initiatives while maintaining resilience across supply chains and critical infrastructure. Leaders must reconcile legacy architectures with cloud-native paradigms, embed security across increasingly distributed environments, and cultivate the internal capabilities to extract continuous value from integrated systems.
Against this backdrop, transformation is not a single program but a sustained capability shift that spans strategy, technology, people, and governance. Successful organizations treat data as an operational asset, prioritize interoperability, and adopt modular architectures that reduce friction for innovation. As enterprises pursue these aims, they encounter trade-offs between control and agility, centralized governance and distributed empowerment, and short-term efficiency gains versus long-term resilience. This analysis establishes a clear orientation for decision-makers by articulating the strategic drivers, ecosystem dynamics, and practical levers that will determine which organizations convert connectivity into competitive advantage.
The landscape of digital infrastructure and operations is shifting along multiple vectors that are reshaping enterprise economics and architecture. Advances in edge computing and real-time analytics enable localized decision-making that reduces latency and preserves bandwidth, while cloud-native patterns continue to accelerate development cycles and foster composable services. Concurrently, pervasive wireless connectivity and the maturation of private 5G create deterministic links between distributed assets and centralized orchestration layers, enabling new classes of industrial automation and customer experiences.
Security and privacy considerations have risen to parity with functional requirements, prompting architectures that embed zero-trust principles and continuous verification. Meanwhile, sustainability and regulatory compliance increasingly influence procurement and lifecycle choices, incentivizing durable, energy-efficient deployments. Workforce evolution is another critical shift: organizations now require cross-disciplinary talent that blends domain expertise, data literacy, and systems engineering. Taken together, these trends compel enterprises to adopt adaptive strategies that balance rapid experimentation with rigorous operational control, thereby transforming how capabilities scale from pilot projects to business-critical systems.
Tariff policies implemented by the United States through 2025 have produced layered effects that extend beyond headline duties to influence procurement practices, supplier relationships, and product design choices. Increased tariff exposure has elevated landed costs for certain categories of components and finished goods, prompting procurement teams to reassess supplier footprints, opt for alternative sourcing corridors, and increase attention to total cost of ownership. In response, many organizations have accelerated nearshoring and diversified vendor portfolios to reduce concentration risk and to shorten replenishment cycles.
At a tactical level, firms have adopted a range of mitigation strategies, including redesigning bill-of-materials to use tariff-favored components, implementing tariff engineering where permissible, and expanding use of bonded logistics arrangements to defer duty impact. Regulatory compliance costs have risen as customs classification, valuation, and origin documentation demand greater precision, incentivizing investment in trade-compliance automation and expert resources. Sector impacts have been uneven: capital-intensive manufacturing lines and high-volume electronics have experienced pronounced supply-chain adjustments, while service-heavy segments face more limited direct tariff exposure but contend with second-order effects through supplier pricing and logistics costs.
Moreover, tariff dynamics have altered the calculus for investment in domestic production capabilities. In some cases, policy-driven incentives and cost dislocations have made localized manufacturing or assembly more attractive, reshaping long-term sourcing strategies. Trade partners' policy responses and the emergence of alternative free trade arrangements have added complexity, encouraging firms to model multiple scenarios and to prioritize flexibility in contracts and inventory policies. Overall, the cumulative effect has been to elevate resilience and strategic sourcing on corporate agendas, making tariff-aware supply chain design an enduring capability rather than a temporary reaction.
Understanding demand and deployment requires a granular segmentation lens that reflects how organizations purchase and implement connected enterprise solutions. On the component axis, the market separates into Services and Solutions, with Services further divided between Managed Services and Professional Services; this distinction matters because the consumption model and long-term relationship dynamics differ substantially between ongoing managed engagements and time-bound professional projects. Consequently, organizations often prefer managed arrangements when prioritizing operational continuity, while professional services are the vehicle for discrete transformation initiatives and accelerations.
Deployment mode is another critical segmentation: Cloud and On Premise approaches co-exist, with Cloud adoption fragmenting into Hybrid Cloud, Private Cloud, and Public Cloud modalities. Each deployment choice reflects trade-offs around latency, data sovereignty, cost predictability, and integration complexity. Hybrid cloud patterns are particularly attractive for organizations that require tight orchestration between centralized analytics and localized control; private cloud appeals to entities with stringent compliance requirements, whereas public cloud offers rapid scalability for non-sensitive workloads.
Organization size also shapes buying behavior, with Large Enterprises gravitating toward integrated platforms and enterprise-grade support models, while Small and Medium Enterprises prioritize rapid time-to-value, modular pricing, and pre-integrated solutions that minimize internal lift. Industry vertical segmentation further differentiates requirements: Banking, Financial Services and Insurance demand heightened security and compliance integration; Energy and Utilities focus on grid resiliency and long lifecycle support; Government and Defense emphasize certification and sovereign solutions; Healthcare and Life Sciences prioritize privacy and clinical integration; Manufacturing and Retail and Ecommerce require interoperability with operational systems and logistics workflows; Transportation and Logistics depend on real-time telematics and routing optimization. Within Manufacturing, the split between Discrete Manufacturing and Process Manufacturing introduces distinct control-system integration and batch versus unit-traceability requirements.
Connectivity type completes the segmentation picture, dividing offerings between Wired and Wireless approaches. Wired connectivity further splits into Ethernet and Fiber Optic, offering stable, high-throughput channels for fixed installations, while Wireless covers Cellular, LPWAN, and Wi Fi that enable mobility, remote telemetry, and low-power wide-area use cases. The selection of connectivity is often a function of the operational environment, bandwidth needs, and total cost of ownership, and it frequently informs the architecture choices for edge compute, data ingestion, and device lifecycle management. Altogether, these intersecting segments define capability roadmaps, procurement criteria, and partner ecosystems, and they provide the structural foundation for go-to-market strategies and product roadmaps.
Regional dynamics materially affect strategy and execution as policy, infrastructure maturity, and customer expectations vary across geographies. The Americas landscape is characterized by a strong drive toward digital transformation, active private investment, and growing emphasis on nearshoring to reduce supply chain latency. Regulatory focus on data protection and industry-specific compliance informs deployment choices, and cloud-first strategies are common among technology adopters, though critical infrastructure projects still favor hybrid or on-premise architectures.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory complexity and cross-border interoperability present both challenges and opportunities. Data residency laws, energy transition initiatives, and a diverse telecom landscape require solutions that are flexible and compliant by design. Public and private sector investments in resilient infrastructure are shaping procurement priorities, and partnerships with local systems integrators and telcos are often essential to navigate regional operational and regulatory requirements.
Asia-Pacific remains a fast-moving and heterogeneous region with concentrated manufacturing hubs, aggressive adoption of 5G and private wireless networks, and a strong appetite for automation and smart manufacturing use cases. Differences in regulatory regimes, industrial policy, and local supplier ecosystems mean that go-to-market approaches must be tailored by country. Rapid urbanization, large-scale industrial modernization programs, and an expanding talent base make the region a focal point for both greenfield deployments and large-scale modernization efforts. Across all regions, geopolitical shifts, supply chain realignments, and localized incentives are shaping where and how enterprises prioritize investments in connected infrastructure.
Leading vendors and system integrators are competing on a mix of platform breadth, vertical specialization, and services delivery models, and successful firms are those that align product roadmaps with real operational outcomes. Providers that prioritize interoperability and open standards reduce integration friction and increase win rates in complex enterprise environments. Meanwhile, those that combine robust managed-service offerings with industry-specific accelerators create differentiated value for clients that need rapid operationalization of pilots at scale.
Strategic partnerships and ecosystem plays are critical: technology providers that forge alliances with connectivity vendors, hardware suppliers, and specialized integrators can present end-to-end value propositions that simplify procurement and accelerate deployment. Investment in domain expertise, such as energy systems engineers or manufacturing process specialists, enables vendors to move beyond generic capabilities and to address the nuanced requirements of distinct verticals. Additionally, pricing models that align vendor incentives with client outcomes-such as performance-based contracts or managed-service subscriptions-are gaining traction as organizations seek predictable operating costs and measurable returns.
Operational excellence also matters; firms that streamline implementation lifecycles, provide clear migration pathways for legacy systems, and maintain strong post-deployment support will capture higher lifetime value. Talent and organizational alignment remain differentiators: companies that embed product management, security, and services engineering into cohesive delivery teams accelerate innovation and reduce time-to-value for clients. In sum, competitive advantage accrues to those that marry technical depth with sectoral insight and that convert complex capability stacks into simple, outcome-driven offerings.
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of high-impact actions that translate strategic intent into operational capabilities. First, build supply chain resilience by diversifying suppliers, increasing visibility into sub-tier components, and establishing flexible inventory policies; combine contractual agility with scenario planning so that procurement can pivot quickly when trade or tariff conditions shift. Second, adopt a hybrid deployment posture that balances cloud agility with on-premise control for latency-sensitive or highly regulated workloads, and create clear migration pathways that protect prior investments while enabling modernization.
Third, embed security and compliance by design into every phase of solution development and deployment; invest in zero-trust architectures, continuous monitoring, and automated compliance workflows to reduce risk while enabling faster innovation. Fourth, develop a layered connectivity strategy that matches application requirements to the appropriate transport mechanism, using wired backbones for throughput-intensive sites and a mix of cellular, LPWAN, and Wi Fi for distributed telemetry and mobility. Fifth, accelerate workforce capability through targeted reskilling initiatives and cross-disciplinary teams that blend domain expertise with data engineering and systems architecture; create rotational programs to retain talent and to accelerate knowledge transfer.
Sixth, pursue partnership-led go-to-market models that combine platform capabilities with local integration expertise, thereby reducing deployment friction and improving time-to-value. Seventh, make sustainability and lifecycle cost part of procurement criteria, prioritizing energy-efficient architectures and longer maintenance horizons. Finally, institutionalize continuous learning through a governance framework that captures lessons from pilots, operationalizes best practices, and ties technology investments to measurable operational KPIs. Taken together, these actions form a pragmatic blueprint for leaders to convert strategic priorities into durable operational advantage.
The research behind this analysis uses a mixed-methods approach designed to balance depth of insight with practical validation. Primary research included structured interviews with senior executives, procurement leaders, systems architects, and domain experts to capture first-hand perspectives on deployment challenges, supplier dynamics, and regulatory impacts. These qualitative inputs were complemented by a review of technical specifications, standards documentation, and publicly disclosed implementation case studies to ground claims in observable practice.
Secondary research involved systematic aggregation of publicly available reports, industry roadmaps, and regulatory guidance to establish context and to identify cross-industry patterns. Data triangulation was applied to reconcile differences across sources, and scenario analysis was used to model the operational implications of policy shifts such as tariff changes. The segmentation framework was validated through workshops with practitioners to ensure that component, deployment, organizational, industry, and connectivity distinctions reflected real procurement decisions.
To preserve rigor, findings were cross-checked with independent technical reviewers and refined through iterative feedback cycles. The methodology acknowledges limitations, including variance in data transparency across geographies and the evolving nature of regulatory environments, and it recommends periodic updates to reflect new policy developments, technological advances, and supply chain shifts. Overall, the approach emphasizes reproducibility, practitioner validation, and a focus on actionable conclusions that support strategic decision-making.
In an environment defined by accelerating connectivity, evolving policy dynamics, and intensifying operational complexity, organizations that embed resilience, interoperability, and outcome orientation into their strategies will gain sustained advantage. Transformation requires more than technology selection; it demands changes to governance, procurement, talent, and vendor relationships so that experimental initiatives can scale into reliable operations. The interplay between tariffs, regional policy, and technology maturity underscores the importance of flexible sourcing and architecture practices that can adapt to changing external conditions.
Executives must align short-term tactical moves with long-term capability building, prioritizing investments that reduce operational risk while enabling innovation. By focusing on hybrid deployment models, security by design, diversified connectivity strategies, and industry-specific solutions, leaders can accelerate value capture and minimize disruption. Ultimately, the organizations that treat the connected enterprise as an ongoing capability rather than a discrete project will be best positioned to capitalize on technological advances and to withstand geopolitical and economic headwinds.