查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1921188

1-萘硼酸市场按应用、纯度等级、物理形态和供应商类型划分－2026-2032年全球预测

1-Naphthaleneboronic Acid Market by Application, Purity Grade, Physical Form, Supplier Type - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 199 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

2025 年 1-萘硼酸市值为 1.5484 亿美元，预计到 2026 年将成长至 1.6978 亿美元，年复合成长率为 9.65%，到 2032 年将达到 2.9521 亿美元。

关键市场统计数据
基准年 2025 1.5484亿美元
预计年份：2026年 1.6978亿美元
预测年份 2032 2.9521亿美元
复合年增长率 (%) 9.65%

权威的介绍，定义了该化合物的化学性质、在合成中的作用、处理注意事项以及跨行业的应用价值。

1-萘硼酸是一类有机硼化合物，其结构中包含一个萘环和一个硼酸官能基，具有促进碳-碳键形成和交叉偶联反应的反应活性。在合成化学中，它们因其与钯催化的Suzuki-Miyaura偶联反应的兼容性而备受重视，能够高效构建二芳基结构，而这些结构是农药、活性药物成分和先进有机材料的核心组成部分。这些化合物通常以固体存在，根据操作和后续加工的需求，可以製备成粉末或溶液形式。

本文从策略角度概述了供应链韧性、永续性要务和应用主导创新如何重新定义采购和开发策略。

随着供应链韧性、永续性和先进应用需求的融合，1-萘硼酸的市场环境正在发生变化，采购和研发重点也随之重塑。在供应方面，采购团队越来越重视多供应商网路和合约条款，这些条款在纯度等级和物理形态方面具有柔软性。为了应对这些变化，製造商和经销商正在实现生产基地多元化，对替代原材料进行认证，并优化物流以减少对前置作业时间的依赖。这些营运方面的改变与对环境、社会和管治(ESG) 实践的日益重视相辅相成，推动了对更环保的合成路线和溶剂回收系统的逐步投资。

分析关税如何增加采购流程的复杂性，加速供应商多元化，并促使整个价值链采取战术性营运应对措施。

关税和贸易措施的实施对参与特种有机硼化学品生产、分销和应用的相关人员产生了重大的营运和策略影响。进口化学中间体关税的提高影响了供应商的定价模式，并推高了到岸成本，促使买家重新评估总拥有成本 (TCO)，而不仅仅依赖标价。这些与关税相关的压力促使企业更加关注供应商多元化、关键原材料加工环节的近岸外包以及签订包含灵活条款的长期合同，以降低价格波动风险。

将应用需求、纯度等级、物理形态和供应商层级与规格、物流和合规性结果连结起来的综合細項分析

细分市场分析揭示了需求和供应策略如何因应用、纯度、物理形态和供应商层级而异，每个维度都影响着规格要求、前置作业时间和认证流程。依应用领域划分，其用途涵盖农业化学中间体、电子製造、材料科学和医药中间体。农业化学中间体领域进一步细分为杀菌剂、除草剂和杀虫剂，这些产品需要精确的杂质谱和批次间一致性，以满足监管和现场性能标准。电子製造应用对污染物特别敏感，目前正在印刷基板生产和半导体製造领域进行深入探索，这两个领域都需要微量金属控制和製程可重复性。在材料科学领域，涂料、光电和聚合物添加剂应用正在探索中，这些应用依赖化合物的特性来实现电子功能、黏附性调节和光学调节。在医药中间体领域，目前正在对原料药生产和药物发现研究进行评估，这两个领域对纯度容差和文件要求各不相同。

从区域观点，探讨地理供应丛集、管理体制和创新生态系统如何影响采购、合规和研发合作选择。

区域趋势正在塑造筹资策略、监管重点和创新路径，每个区域都有独特的优势和营运考量，这些因素都会影响供需模式。在美洲，精细化学品製造群和成熟的物流走廊为北美配方商和製药生产商提供了接近性优势。同时，监管重点在于电子可追溯性和环境合规性。在欧洲、中东和非洲地区（EMEA），法规结构和永续性要求通常要求供应商证明其合成方法对环境负责、拥有完善的废弃物管理系统并进行生命週期评估。不同的管理体制也使得跨境供应需要谨慎考虑。亚太地区的特点是拥有专业的中间产品产能，并在电子製造和材料创新领域占据重要地位，许多买家在成本竞争力强的采购与加强品管和长期供应商选择投资之间寻求平衡。

检验技术服务能力、供应可靠性和永续发展措施如何决定特种化学品供应商和经销商之间的竞争格局

1-萘硼酸价值链中的企业层面趋势表明，技术能力、分析支援和一体化物流在竞争差异化中至关重要。主要企业和特种化学品经销商通常会投资建立内部分析实验室，以提供分析证书、杂质分析和分析方法转移服务，从而加快客户资格认证。化学品製造商与下游配方商之间的策略联盟十分普遍，这使得双方能够共同开发特定应用等级的产品、扩大合成路线规模，并在优化试剂处理方面开展合作解决问题。

针对高阶主管和技术领导者的具体建议：透过整合供应链和研发策略，增强韧性、确保品质并加速应用推广。

产业领导者应优先采取一系列战术性和策略倡议，将供应链洞察转化为永续的商业性优势。首先，应整合多元化采购策略，平衡区域生产基地与策略库存中心。这有助于减少对单一供应来源的依赖，并减轻贸易措施和物流中断的影响。此外，还应实施严格的供应商资格认证通讯协定，包括强制进行分析证书检验、现场和远端审核，以及针对不合格批次采取双方认可的纠正措施，以确保在应用敏感型环境中的一致性。

我们采用透明且可复製的调查方法，结合相关人员访谈、技术文献综合分析和供应商文件检验，以确保获得可靠的洞见。

本分析的调查方法融合了对关键相关人员的访谈、技术文献综述和供应链图谱分析，旨在全面了解营运和应用动态。关键资讯来源包括对来自製造和研发部门的采购经理、製程化学家和品质保证负责人进行结构化访谈，以获取有关规格基准值、操作规范和供应商选择标准的第一手资料。这些定性资讯与有机硼化学方面的技术文献、化学品处理和运输的法规指南以及公开的供应商文件进行交叉比对，以确保研究结果的事实依据和可重复性。

总之，我们提出了一个综合观点，即采购、技术能力和永续性的策略协调对于确保可靠的应用结果和商业性优势至关重要。

总之，1-萘硼酸是合成化学和工业应用的核心成分，其规格控制、供应可靠性和技术支援决定商业性成败。相关人员必须应对不断变化的贸易环境、日益严格的永续性以及电子、材料、农业化学品和製药行业不断加快的应用需求。有效的应对措施取决于采购策略与筹资策略重点的一致性、对分析和配方服务的投资（以加快认证速度）以及建立包含可追溯性和紧急时应对计画的供应商关係。

目录

第一章：序言

第二章调查方法

  • 研究设计
  • 研究框架
  • 市场规模预测
  • 数据三角测量
  • 调查结果
  • 调查前提
  • 调查限制

第三章执行摘要

  • 首席主管观点
  • 市场规模和成长趋势
  • 2025年市占率分析
  • FPNV定位矩阵，2025
  • 新的商机
  • 下一代经营模式
  • 产业蓝图

第四章 市场概览

  • 产业生态系与价值链分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市场展望
  • 上市策略

第五章 市场洞察

  • 消费者洞察与终端用户观点
  • 消费者体验基准
  • 机会地图
  • 分销通路分析
  • 价格趋势分析
  • 监理合规和标准框架
  • ESG与永续性分析
  • 中断和风险情景
  • 投资报酬率和成本效益分析

第六章：美国关税的累积影响，2025年

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

8. 1-萘硼酸市场依应用领域划分

  • 农业化学品中间体
    • 消毒剂
    • 除草剂
    • 杀虫剂
  • 电子设备製造
    • 印刷基板製造
    • 半导体製造
  • 材料科学
    • 涂层
    • 光电
    • 聚合物添加剂
  • 医药中间体
    • 原料药
    • 药物发现研究

9. 1-萘硼酸市场依纯度等级划分

  • 分析级
  • 试剂级
  • 技术级

10. 1-萘硼酸市场（依物理形态划分）

  • 颗粒状
  • 粉末状
  • 解决方案

第十一章 1-萘硼酸市场（供应商类型划分）

  • OEM供应商
  • 一级供应商
  • 二级供应商

第十二章 1-萘硼酸市场（按地区划分）

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

第十三章 1-萘硼酸市场（按组别划分）

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第十四章 1-各国萘硼酸市场

  • 美国
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

第十五章美国1-萘硼酸市场

第十六章 中国萘硼酸市场

第十七章 竞争格局

  • 市场集中度分析，2025年
    • 浓度比（CR）
    • 赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数 (HHI)
  • 近期趋势及影响分析，2025 年
  • 2025年产品系列分析
  • 基准分析，2025 年
  • ABCR GmbH & Co. KG
  • Beijing InnoChem Science & Technology Development Co., Ltd.
  • Bide Pharmatech Ltd.
  • Frontier Scientific, Inc.
  • Hangzhou DayangChem Co., Ltd.
  • Key Organics Limited
  • Merck KGaA
  • Spectrum Chemical Manufacturing Corp.
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
  • Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.
Product Code: MRR-867BED9A9CFC

The 1-Naphthaleneboronic Acid Market was valued at USD 154.84 million in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 169.78 million in 2026, with a CAGR of 9.65%, reaching USD 295.21 million by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 154.84 million
Estimated Year [2026] USD 169.78 million
Forecast Year [2032] USD 295.21 million
CAGR (%) 9.65%

An authoritative introduction that defines the compound's chemical identity, role in synthesis, handling imperatives, and cross-industry operational relevance

1-Naphthaleneboronic acid is an organoboron compound characterized by a naphthalene ring bonded to a boronic acid functional group, delivering reactivity that supports carbon-carbon bond formation and cross-coupling transformations. In synthetic chemistry it is prized for its compatibility with palladium-catalyzed Suzuki-Miyaura coupling reactions, enabling the efficient construction of biaryl architectures that are central to agrochemicals, active pharmaceutical agents, and advanced organic materials. The compound typically presents as a solid that can be formulated in powder or solution forms depending on handling and downstream processing needs.

From a handling and safety perspective, practitioners must be mindful of boronic acid propensity to form condensation products under certain conditions and the potential for dust inhalation when working with powder forms. Appropriate storage under controlled humidity, use of personal protective equipment, and adherence to standard chemical hygiene practices mitigate these risks. Regulatory attention frequently centers on occupational exposure limits, transport classification, and waste-stream management, which in turn influence supplier documentation and customer requirements.

Operationally, 1-naphthaleneboronic acid occupies an important role at the intersection of research chemistry and industrial manufacture. It functions both as a discrete intermediate destined for end-user synthesis and as a building block within more complex value chains. As a result, stakeholders from procurement to process chemists and quality assurance teams must align on specifications, purity grades, and supply continuity to preserve batch-to-batch reproducibility and comply with formulation or regulatory constraints.

A strategic overview of how supply chain resilience, sustainability imperatives, and application-driven innovation are redefining sourcing and development strategies

The landscape for 1-naphthaleneboronic acid is shifting as supply chain resilience, sustainability, and advanced application demands converge to reshape sourcing and R&D priorities. On the supply side, procurement teams increasingly prioritize multi-sourced supplier networks and contractual terms that embed flexibility for purity grades and physical forms. Manufacturers and distributors are responding by diversifying production footprints, qualifying alternate feedstocks, and optimizing logistics to reduce lead-time sensitivity. These operational shifts are interlinked with an intensified focus on environmental, social, and governance practices, which are prompting incremental investment in greener synthesis routes and solvent recovery systems.

Concurrently, innovation at the application layer is accelerating adoption beyond traditional coupling roles into functional materials and device-level integrations. Advances in photonics and polymer additive chemistry are leveraging boronic acid derivatives to impart tunable electronic properties and enhanced interfacial compatibility. In the pharmaceutical and agrochemical arenas, the reagent retains a central role in enabling modular molecule construction, while drug discovery groups exploit its versatility in combinatorial and late-stage functionalization workflows.

Regulatory and trade dynamics are also reshaping decision-making. Increasing scrutiny over chemical supply chains has elevated the importance of transparent traceability and compliance documentation. As a result, companies are investing in supplier audits, analytical verification protocols, and data-driven quality assurance frameworks. Taken together, these trends point to a market environment that prizes adaptive sourcing, analytical rigor, and cross-functional collaboration to convert raw chemical capability into reliable commercial outcomes.

A focused analysis of how tariff measures have increased procurement complexity, accelerated supplier diversification, and prompted tactical operational responses across the value chain

The imposition of tariffs and trade measures has had material operational and strategic consequences for stakeholders involved in the production, distribution, and application of specialty organoboron chemicals. Increased duties on imported chemical intermediates have influenced supplier pricing models, elevated landed costs, and incentivized buyers to reassess total cost of ownership rather than relying solely on headline unit prices. These tariff-related pressures have amplified interest in diversifying supplier pools, nearshoring key feedstock processes, and securing long-term contracts with flex provisions to dampen volatility.

At the operational level, procurement cycles have lengthened as buyers build additional due diligence into sourcing decisions, seeking suppliers with robust customs classification practices and proven compliance track records. Logistics teams have faced higher administrative burdens to reconcile tariff codes and duties, while finance functions contend with margin compression when contractual pass-through is limited. These dynamics have also encouraged certain manufacturers to explore cost mitigation strategies such as consolidating shipments, modifying packaging to alter tariff treatment in compliance with regulations, and negotiating tariff-inclusive pricing structures.

For research and development groups, tariffs have sharpened attention on synthetic route optimization and reagent efficiency. Teams are prioritizing reactions that reduce reliance on high-cost intermediates or enable in-house generation of critical boron derivatives. In parallel, downstream formulators have started to evaluate substitution opportunities and rework process flows to maintain product performance while reducing exposure to incremental import costs. Collectively, the cumulative impact has elevated the strategic importance of trade-aware sourcing, analytic verification of supplier claims, and agility in reconfiguring supply lines when duties or trade measures evolve.

Comprehensive segmentation insights linking application demands, purity tiers, physical forms, and supplier hierarchy to specification, logistics, and compliance outcomes

Segmentation insights reveal how demand and supplier strategies vary according to application, purity, physical form, and supplier tier, with each axis shaping specification expectations, lead times, and qualification workflows. Based on Application, usage spans Agrochemical Intermediate, Electronic Manufacturing, Material Science, and Pharmaceutical Intermediate, where the Agrochemical Intermediate segment further subdivides into fungicides, herbicides, and insecticides that require precise impurity profiles and batch consistency to meet regulatory and field performance standards. The Electronic Manufacturing application is particularly sensitive to contaminants and is further studied across printed circuit board production and semiconductor manufacturing, both of which demand trace-metal control and process reproducibility. Material Science applications explore coatings, photonics, and polymer additives that rely on the compound's ability to impart electronic function, adhesion modulation, or optical tuning. The Pharmaceutical Intermediate application is assessed across active pharmaceutical ingredient production and drug discovery research, each with divergent purity tolerances and documentation needs.

Purity Grade segmentation shows distinct buyer behavior across analytical grade, reagent grade, and technical grade offerings: analytical grade supports high-precision characterization and impurity profiling; reagent grade aligns with synthetic chemistry use where well-defined reactivity is required; and technical grade supplies less stringent industrial processes. These differences influence sample lead times, certificate of analysis expectations, and acceptable tolerances in incoming inspection protocols. Physical Form segmentation - granular form, powder form, and solution form - affects handling, dosing accuracy, and shelf-life considerations; powder forms are common for bulk chemical synthesis while solution forms may be preferred for automated dosing in electronic or pharmaceutical manufacturing lines. Supplier Type segmentation into OEM suppliers, Tier 1 suppliers, and Tier 2 suppliers highlights the layered nature of the supply chain, where OEM suppliers maintain direct relationships with end-manufacturers and offer integrated quality and logistics services, Tier 1 suppliers provide consistent volumes with documented traceability, and Tier 2 suppliers often serve as regional or specialized providers with niche capabilities. Understanding the interplay of these segments enables more precise supplier qualification, specification negotiation, and inventory strategies that align technical requirements with operational realities.

A nuanced regional perspective on how geographic supply clusters, regulatory regimes, and innovation ecosystems influence sourcing, compliance, and R&D collaboration choices

Regional dynamics are shaping sourcing strategies, regulatory priorities, and innovation pathways, each region presenting distinct advantages and operational considerations that influence supply and demand patterns. In the Americas, manufacturing clusters for fine chemicals and established logistical corridors offer proximity benefits for North American formulators and pharmaceutical producers, while regulatory expectations emphasize electronic traceability and environmental compliance. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory frameworks and sustainability mandates frequently drive suppliers to demonstrate greener synthesis approaches, robust waste management, and lifecycle assessments, and the region's diverse regulatory regimes require careful navigation for cross-border supply. The Asia-Pacific region is notable for its production capacity in specialty intermediates as well as its strong presence in electronics manufacturing and materials innovation, prompting many buyers to balance cost-competitive sourcing with heightened quality control and longer-term supplier qualification investments.

Across these regions, trade policies, infrastructure maturity, and local regulatory enforcement shape decisions about stock positioning, lead-time buffers, and redundancy. Companies operating globally often adopt hybrid sourcing strategies that combine regional production hubs with strategic inventory points to reduce exposure to localized disruptions. Research and development collaborations also exhibit geographic patterns: clusters of advanced materials research and semiconductor expertise influence where high-purity, application-specific formulations are developed and validated. These regional considerations feed directly into supplier selection criteria, risk assessments, and contingency planning frameworks, compelling procurement and R&D teams to align on regional priorities and qualification roadmaps.

An examination of how technical service capabilities, supply reliability, and sustainability commitments determine competitive positioning among specialty chemical suppliers and distributors

Company-level dynamics in the 1-naphthaleneboronic acid value chain demonstrate the importance of technical capability, analytical support, and integrated logistics in establishing competitive differentiation. Leading manufacturers and specialty chemical distributors typically invest in in-house analytical laboratories to furnish certificates of analysis, impurity profiling, and method transfer services that accelerate customer qualification. Strategic partnerships between chemical producers and downstream formulators are common, enabling co-development of application-specific grades and collaborative problem-solving when scaling synthetic routes or optimizing reagent handling.

Supply reliability is increasingly a differentiator; firms that offer comprehensive documentation, batch traceability, and consistent lead times command stronger long-term customer relationships. Companies pursuing vertical integration or strategic collaborations with catalyst and solvent providers often reduce operational friction and improve total process robustness for end-users. Additionally, several players have prioritized sustainability initiatives-such as reducing solvent usage, adopting catalytic process improvements, and implementing waste reduction programs-to meet buyer expectations and regulatory pressures. Market entrants and smaller niche suppliers frequently focus on agility, customized specifications, and responsive technical service to carve out positions alongside established producers. Taken together, competitive positioning in this space depends on a clear blend of technical service excellence, quality assurance rigor, and ability to adapt logistics models to customer risk tolerances.

Actionable recommendations for executives and technical leaders to enhance resilience, secure quality, and accelerate application adoption through integrated supply and R&D strategies

Industry leaders should prioritize a set of tactical and strategic initiatives to convert supply chain insight into durable commercial advantage. First, integrate multi-sourcing strategies that balance regional production footprints with strategic inventory hubs; doing so reduces reliance on single-origin suppliers and smooths exposure to trade measures or logistical disruptions. Complement this with rigorous supplier qualification protocols that mandate certificate of analysis verification, on-site or remote audits, and agreed remediation pathways for nonconforming batches to ensure consistency in application-sensitive environments.

Second, invest in analytical and formulation support capabilities. Providing rapid, application-specific analytical services and method transfer assistance reduces time-to-qualification for customers and strengthens partnerships. This also supports substitution risk mitigation by enabling technical teams to test alternative grades or physical forms with minimal disruption. Third, pursue process efficiency and greener synthesis initiatives to lower environmental footprints and align with customer sustainability requirements; demonstrating measurable improvements in solvent recovery, waste reduction, or energy use enhances commercial credibility and may simplify market access under tightening regulatory regimes.

Fourth, align commercial and legal contracting to incorporate tariff and trade contingencies, including flexible pricing mechanisms, Incoterm clarity, and logistics pass-through arrangements. Fifth, foster cross-functional collaboration between procurement, R&D, and quality assurance so that specification changes, regulatory updates, or supply events are managed holistically rather than in silos. Executing these recommendations will require prioritized investment, clear KPIs related to quality and supply continuity, and leadership commitment to embed resilience-minded practices into commercial and technical workflows.

A transparent, reproducible research methodology combining stakeholder interviews, technical literature synthesis, and supplier documentation verification to ensure robust insights

The research approach underpinning this analysis synthesized primary stakeholder interviews, technical literature review, and supply chain mapping to build a comprehensive understanding of operational and application dynamics. Primary inputs included structured interviews with procurement leads, process chemists, and quality assurance professionals across manufacturing and R&D organizations, enabling direct insights into specification thresholds, handling practices, and supplier selection criteria. These qualitative inputs were triangulated with technical literature on organoboron chemistry, regulatory guidance on chemical handling and transport, and publicly available supplier documentation to ensure factual grounding and reproducibility of the findings.

Analytical rigor was maintained through cross-verification of supplier capability claims against certificates of analysis and third-party testing where available, and by documenting assumptions and data limitations. The methodology emphasized reproducible audit trails for supplier attribution and focused on capturing operational impacts-such as lead times, analytical testing requirements, and specification differentials-rather than attempting to produce numerical market forecasts. Limitations of the study include variability in company confidentiality around contract terms and proprietary synthesis routes, which constrain the granularity of certain supplier practices. To mitigate these gaps, sensitivity-focused questioning and anonymized case examples were employed to reflect plausible operational behaviors without disclosing proprietary details.

A conclusive synthesis emphasizing the strategic imperative of aligning procurement, technical capability, and sustainability to secure reliable application outcomes and commercial advantage

In sum, 1-naphthaleneboronic acid occupies a strategic junction between synthetic chemistry and industrial application where specification control, supply reliability, and technical support determine commercial outcomes. Stakeholders must navigate evolving trade environments, tightening sustainability expectations, and accelerating application requirements in electronics, materials, agrochemicals, and pharmaceuticals. Effective responses hinge on aligning procurement strategy with R&D priorities, investing in analytical and formulation services that reduce time-to-qualification, and establishing supplier relationships that embed traceability and contingency planning.

Operational leaders should adopt an integrated approach that balances near-term tactics-such as diversifying suppliers and reinforcing contractual clarity around tariffs-with medium-term investments in process improvement and sustainability. By doing so, organizations can mitigate exposure to trade-related cost pressures, maintain product performance across application segments, and position themselves to capture opportunities as advanced materials and drug discovery applications continue to evolve. The overarching imperative is to treat the supply chain as a strategic asset: robust documentation, cross-functional cooperation, and technical agility are the levers that convert chemical capability into reliable commercial execution.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. 1-Naphthaleneboronic Acid Market, by Application

  • 8.1. Agrochemical Intermediate
    • 8.1.1. Fungicides
    • 8.1.2. Herbicides
    • 8.1.3. Insecticides
  • 8.2. Electronic Manufacturing
    • 8.2.1. Printed Circuit Board Production
    • 8.2.2. Semiconductor Manufacturing
  • 8.3. Material Science
    • 8.3.1. Coatings
    • 8.3.2. Photonics
    • 8.3.3. Polymer Additives
  • 8.4. Pharmaceutical Intermediate
    • 8.4.1. Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient
    • 8.4.2. Drug Discovery Research

9. 1-Naphthaleneboronic Acid Market, by Purity Grade

  • 9.1. Analytical Grade
  • 9.2. Reagent Grade
  • 9.3. Technical Grade

10. 1-Naphthaleneboronic Acid Market, by Physical Form

  • 10.1. Granular Form
  • 10.2. Powder Form
  • 10.3. Solution Form

11. 1-Naphthaleneboronic Acid Market, by Supplier Type

  • 11.1. OEM Suppliers
  • 11.2. Tier 1 Suppliers
  • 11.3. Tier 2 Suppliers

12. 1-Naphthaleneboronic Acid Market, by Region

  • 12.1. Americas
    • 12.1.1. North America
    • 12.1.2. Latin America
  • 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 12.2.1. Europe
    • 12.2.2. Middle East
    • 12.2.3. Africa
  • 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. 1-Naphthaleneboronic Acid Market, by Group

  • 13.1. ASEAN
  • 13.2. GCC
  • 13.3. European Union
  • 13.4. BRICS
  • 13.5. G7
  • 13.6. NATO

14. 1-Naphthaleneboronic Acid Market, by Country

  • 14.1. United States
  • 14.2. Canada
  • 14.3. Mexico
  • 14.4. Brazil
  • 14.5. United Kingdom
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. France
  • 14.8. Russia
  • 14.9. Italy
  • 14.10. Spain
  • 14.11. China
  • 14.12. India
  • 14.13. Japan
  • 14.14. Australia
  • 14.15. South Korea

15. United States 1-Naphthaleneboronic Acid Market

16. China 1-Naphthaleneboronic Acid Market

17. Competitive Landscape

  • 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 17.5. ABCR GmbH & Co. KG
  • 17.6. Beijing InnoChem Science & Technology Development Co., Ltd.
  • 17.7. Bide Pharmatech Ltd.
  • 17.8. Frontier Scientific, Inc.
  • 17.9. Hangzhou DayangChem Co., Ltd.
  • 17.10. Key Organics Limited
  • 17.11. Merck KGaA
  • 17.12. Spectrum Chemical Manufacturing Corp.
  • 17.13. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
  • 17.14. Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. CHINA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY FUNGICIDES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY FUNGICIDES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY FUNGICIDES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY HERBICIDES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY HERBICIDES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY HERBICIDES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY INSECTICIDES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY INSECTICIDES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY INSECTICIDES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD PRODUCTION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD PRODUCTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD PRODUCTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHOTONICS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHOTONICS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHOTONICS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER ADDITIVES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER ADDITIVES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER ADDITIVES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL INGREDIENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL INGREDIENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL INGREDIENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY DRUG DISCOVERY RESEARCH, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY DRUG DISCOVERY RESEARCH, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY DRUG DISCOVERY RESEARCH, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ANALYTICAL GRADE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ANALYTICAL GRADE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ANALYTICAL GRADE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY REAGENT GRADE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY REAGENT GRADE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY REAGENT GRADE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNICAL GRADE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNICAL GRADE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNICAL GRADE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY GRANULAR FORM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY GRANULAR FORM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY GRANULAR FORM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY POWDER FORM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY POWDER FORM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY POWDER FORM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION FORM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION FORM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION FORM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY OEM SUPPLIERS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY OEM SUPPLIERS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY OEM SUPPLIERS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY TIER 1 SUPPLIERS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY TIER 1 SUPPLIERS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY TIER 1 SUPPLIERS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY TIER 2 SUPPLIERS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY TIER 2 SUPPLIERS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY TIER 2 SUPPLIERS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. AMERICAS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. AMERICAS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. AMERICAS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. AMERICAS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. AMERICAS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. AMERICAS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. AMERICAS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. AMERICAS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. AMERICAS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. NORTH AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. NORTH AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. NORTH AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. NORTH AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. NORTH AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. NORTH AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. NORTH AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. NORTH AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. NORTH AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. LATIN AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. LATIN AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. LATIN AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. LATIN AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. LATIN AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. LATIN AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. LATIN AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. LATIN AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. LATIN AMERICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. EUROPE 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. EUROPE 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. EUROPE 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. EUROPE 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. EUROPE 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. EUROPE 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. EUROPE 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. EUROPE 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. EUROPE 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. MIDDLE EAST 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. MIDDLE EAST 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. MIDDLE EAST 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. MIDDLE EAST 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. MIDDLE EAST 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. MIDDLE EAST 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. MIDDLE EAST 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. MIDDLE EAST 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. MIDDLE EAST 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. AFRICA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. ASIA-PACIFIC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. ASIA-PACIFIC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. ASIA-PACIFIC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. ASIA-PACIFIC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. ASIA-PACIFIC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. ASIA-PACIFIC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. ASIA-PACIFIC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. ASIA-PACIFIC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. ASIA-PACIFIC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. ASEAN 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. ASEAN 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. ASEAN 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. ASEAN 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. ASEAN 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. ASEAN 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. ASEAN 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. ASEAN 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. ASEAN 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. GCC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. GCC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. GCC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. GCC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. GCC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. GCC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. GCC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. GCC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. GCC 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. EUROPEAN UNION 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. EUROPEAN UNION 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. EUROPEAN UNION 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. EUROPEAN UNION 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. EUROPEAN UNION 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. EUROPEAN UNION 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. EUROPEAN UNION 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. EUROPEAN UNION 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. EUROPEAN UNION 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. BRICS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. BRICS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. BRICS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. BRICS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. BRICS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. BRICS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. BRICS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. BRICS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. BRICS 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. G7 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. G7 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. G7 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. G7 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. G7 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. G7 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. G7 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. G7 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. G7 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. NATO 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. NATO 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 200. NATO 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 201. NATO 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 202. NATO 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 203. NATO 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 204. NATO 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 205. NATO 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 206. NATO 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 207. GLOBAL 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 208. UNITED STATES 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 209. UNITED STATES 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 210. UNITED STATES 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 211. UNITED STATES 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 212. UNITED STATES 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 213. UNITED STATES 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 214. UNITED STATES 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 215. UNITED STATES 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 216. UNITED STATES 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 217. CHINA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 218. CHINA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 219. CHINA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY AGROCHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 220. CHINA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 221. CHINA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL SCIENCE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 222. CHINA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICAL INTERMEDIATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 223. CHINA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PURITY GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 224. CHINA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 225. CHINA 1-NAPHTHALENEBORONIC ACID MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPLIER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)