查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1925520

按元件类型、额定电压、应用和最终用户产业分類的碳化硅分立元件市场－2026-2032年全球预测

Silicon Carbide Discrete Devices Market by Device Type, Voltage Rating, Applications, End-User Industries - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 197 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

2025 年碳化硅分立元件市场规模为 81.8 亿美元，预计 2026 年将成长至 89.5 亿美元，预计到 2032 年将达到 158.5 亿美元，复合年增长率为 9.90%。

关键市场统计数据
基准年 2025 81.8亿美元
预计年份：2026年 89.5亿美元
预测年份 2032 158.5亿美元
复合年增长率 (%) 9.90%

本文对碳化硅分立元件的核心技术优势及其为何正在重塑电力电子应用领域进行了策略性介绍。

碳化硅分立元件代表了电力电子材料和结构的变革，它将半导体物理学与系统级优化相结合，从而实现了比传统硅元件更高的效率、更高的工作温度和更高的开关频率。本文概述了这项技术的关键特征，阐明了它对汽车、工业和能源产业决策者的重要性，并展望了技术选择如何转化为商业性成果。

对推动碳化硅在电力电子领域应用的产业变革性技术、供应链与应用转变进行全面分析

技术、法规和终端市场需求等变革性力量正迅速改变碳化硅分立元件的格局。外延生长、装置设计和封装技术的进步降低了高性能组件的进入门槛。同时，交通运输和能源产业的原始设备製造商（OEM）正在重新思考其架构，以充分利用碳化硅优异的热性能和开关特性。因此，传统上以硅基设计为中心的产品蓝图正在重新评估，以追求宽能带隙半导体所带来的更高效率和功率密度。

对2025年美国关税如何重塑整个价值链的筹资策略、供应商关係和产能决策进行详细评估。

2025年美国政策调整和关税政策为碳化硅分立元件价值链上的企业带来了新的挑战。关税带来的成本压力不断增加，加速了企业对筹资策略的重新评估，并加剧了国内产能的讨论。相关人员正在认真权衡短期成本影响和长期供应稳定性之间的利弊。为此，许多企业优先考虑供应商多元化，并加强合约条款，以降低自身受贸易政策突发变化的影响。

详细的細項分析揭示了设备类型、电压等级、应用和最终用户产业如何独特地影响选择标准和认证流程。

细分市场分析揭示了驱动元件选择、筹资策略和产品开发优先顺序的独特技术和商业动态。基于装置类型的关键考量区分了绝缘栅双极电晶体(IGBT) 的选择（其稳健性和高电流能力至关重要）和金属氧化物半导体场效场效电晶体(MOSFET) 的选择（其优先考虑开关速度和效率）。同时，功率模组具有热设计和整合方面的复杂性，而肖特基二极体因其在整流阶段的低正向电压特性而被选中。每种装置类别都有其独特的认证通讯协定和供应链限制，产品团队必须使其与系统级效能目标保持一致。

区域情报摘要：说明美洲、欧洲、中东和非洲以及亚太地区将如何影响供应链韧性、认证流程和战略重点。

区域趋势正对碳化硅分立元件的供应链、认证流程和商业策略产生重大影响。在美洲，相关人员致力于加强国内组装和测试基础设施以及技术生态系统，以支持汽车电气化和工业现代化项目。这些努力与提高关键应用领域供应韧性和降低前置作业时间风险的更广泛目标一致，同时也影响采购週期和资金配置。

主要企业的企业策略概述，这些策略优先考虑晶圆品质、封装创新、伙伴关係主导的设计采纳和卓越运营，以确保系统级采纳。

碳化硅分立元件领域的企业策略通用关注材料技术、系统级伙伴关係以及规模化生产整合。主要企业优先投资于晶圆品质、后端封装和温度控管，以减少故障模式并提高装置一致性，从而实现系统整合。与逆变器供应商和原始设备製造商 (OEM) 建立策略联盟正成为设计方案被采纳的主要途径，因为共同开发契约能够加快产品上市速度，并将产品规格嵌入车辆和电网级架构中。

透过技术投资、供应链多元化和与原始设备製造商 (OEM) 合作，为加速碳化硅倡议的推广应用和降低相关风险提供切实可行的建议。

产业领导者应采取协作方式，整合技术投资、供应链策略和客户参与，以充分发挥碳化硅分立元件的潜力。应优先进行跨职能项目，连接元件开发和系统整合团队，确保晶粒级改进能够直接转化为可衡量的效率提升和系统成本降低。这种协作方式缩短了设计迭代和现场检验的回馈週期，加快了认证流程，同时保持了产品的可靠性。

研究采用透明的调查方法，结合了初步访谈、技术表征、专利和政策审查以及专家检验，以确保研究结果可操作且检验。

本报告的调查方法结合了初步技术检验、相关人员访谈和多学科资料检验，从而得出可靠且以应用为导向的见解。我们对电力电子设计师、采购主管和研发经理进行了初步访谈，以了解实际决策标准和认证限制。此外，我们也透过实验室层级的装置特性分析和失效模式分析，检验了装置在典型工作条件下的性能特性。

简要总结了实现碳化硅系统级效益所需的技术机会、策略挑战和协作行动。

碳化硅分立元件正处于一个转折点，材料创新、工业能力和不断变化的应用需求正在融合，重塑电力电子策略。这项技术的固有优势为交通运输、工业和能源应用领域带来了更高的效率、更低的热负荷和更高密度的功率设计机会。然而，要实现这些优势，装置製造商、系统整合商和采购机构需要携手合作，共同应对认证流程、复杂的供应链以及区域政策差异。

目录

第一章：序言

第二章调查方法

  • 研究设计
  • 研究框架
  • 市场规模预测
  • 数据三角测量
  • 调查结果
  • 调查前提
  • 调查限制

第三章执行摘要

  • 首席主管观点
  • 市场规模和成长趋势
  • 2025年市占率分析
  • FPNV定位矩阵，2025
  • 新的商机
  • 下一代经营模式
  • 产业蓝图

第四章 市场概览

  • 产业生态系与价值链分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市场展望
  • 市场进入策略

第五章 市场洞察

  • 消费者洞察与终端用户观点
  • 消费者体验基准
  • 机会地图
  • 分销通路分析
  • 价格趋势分析
  • 监理合规和标准框架
  • ESG与永续性分析
  • 中断和风险情景
  • 投资报酬率和成本效益分析

第六章：美国关税的累积影响，2025年

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

8. 依元件类型分類的碳化硅分立元件市场

  • 绝缘栅双极电晶体
  • 金属氧化物半导体场场效电晶体
  • 电源模组
  • 肖特基二极体

9. 依额定电压分類的碳化硅分立元件市场

  • 高压
  • 低电压
  • 中压

10. 按应用分類的碳化硅分立元件市场

  • 电动车
  • 工业电机
  • 功率转换
  • 太阳能发电

11. 依终端用户产业分類的碳化硅分立元件市场

  • 航太/国防
  • 车
  • 家用电子电器
  • 能源与电力

12. 各地区碳化硅分立元件市场

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

第十三章 碳化硅分立元件市场（依类别划分）

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

14. 各国碳化硅分立元件市场

  • 我们
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

15. 美国碳化硅分立元件市场

第十六章 中国碳化硅分立元件市场

第十七章 竞争格局

  • 市场集中度分析，2025年
    • 浓度比（CR）
    • 赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数 (HHI)
  • 近期趋势及影响分析，2025 年
  • 2025年产品系列分析
  • 基准分析，2025 年
  • ABB Ltd.
  • Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited
  • CISSOID SA
  • Coherent Corp.
  • Diodes Incorporated
  • Fuji Electric Co., Ltd.
  • General Electric Company
  • GeneSiC Semiconductor Inc. by Navitas Semiconductor, Inc.
  • Infineon Technologies AG
  • Littelfuse, Inc.
  • Micro Commercial Components, Corp.
  • Microchip Technology Incorporated
  • Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
  • ON Semiconductor Corporation
  • Robert Bosch GmbH
  • ROHM Co., Ltd.
  • Semikron Danfoss Elektronik GmbH & Co. KG.
  • Solitron Devices Inc.
  • STMicroelectronics NV
  • SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES, LTD.
  • Toshiba Corporation
  • Vishay Intertechnology inc.
  • WeEn Semiconductors Co., Ltd
  • Wolfspeed, Inc.
Product Code: MRR-7A380DA7C681

The Silicon Carbide Discrete Devices Market was valued at USD 8.18 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 8.95 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 9.90%, reaching USD 15.85 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 8.18 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 8.95 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 15.85 billion
CAGR (%) 9.90%

A strategic introduction explaining the core technological benefits of silicon carbide discrete devices and why they are reshaping power electronics applications

Silicon carbide discrete devices represent a material and architectural shift in power electronics, blending semiconductor physics with system-level optimization to enable higher efficiency, higher temperature operation, and higher switching frequencies than traditional silicon counterparts. This introduction frames the technology's defining traits, clarifies why it matters to decision-makers across automotive, industrial, and energy sectors, and sets expectations for how technical choices translate into commercial outcomes.

At the device level, silicon carbide enables lower conduction losses and faster switching, which together reduce thermal management burdens and allow denser power conversion designs. At the system level, these characteristics unlock smaller passive components, reduced cooling infrastructure, and higher power density in inverter and converter assemblies. Consequently, product teams and procurement organizations must evaluate devices not only for die-level performance but for the system-level implications on reliability, manufacturability, and total cost of ownership.

Beyond intrinsic device advantages, adoption is being shaped by an evolving ecosystem that includes specialized wafer fabs, power module assemblers, and tier-one OEMs optimizing inverter architectures for electric vehicles and renewable integration. Understanding the interplay between materials, device architecture, and system design is essential for framing strategic investments and aligning product roadmaps with emergent application requirements.

An integrative analysis of industry-altering technological, supply chain, and application shifts that are driving silicon carbide adoption across power electronics sectors

The landscape for silicon carbide discrete devices is changing rapidly under a set of transformative forces that span technology, regulation, and end-market demand. Advances in epitaxial growth, device design, and packaging have lowered barriers to entry for higher-performance parts, while OEMs in transportation and energy are rethinking architectures to leverage silicon carbide's thermal and switching advantages. As a result, product roadmaps that were once centered on silicon-based designs are being revisited to exploit the efficiency and power-density gains afforded by wide-bandgap semiconductors.

Concurrently, industry players are responding to supply chain imperatives and policy drivers that accelerate domestic capability building and diversify sourcing footprints. Investment in larger-diameter silicon carbide wafers and upgrading back-end assembly capacity are enabling higher throughput and improved yield curves, which in turn influence product cost structures and qualification cycles. In parallel, design-in cycles are shortening as converter and inverter suppliers standardize reference platforms that ease integration of discrete devices into modules.

Taken together, these shifts favor firms that can combine deep device-level expertise with system integration capabilities and agile supply chain strategies. Early adopters that coordinate cross-functional teams-spanning materials science, power electronics design, and procurement-are best positioned to convert technical advantages into sustained commercial differentiation.

A detailed assessment of how United States tariff measures enacted in 2025 have reshaped sourcing strategies, supplier relationships, and capacity decisions across the value chain

Policy adjustments and tariff measures implemented by the United States in 2025 have introduced a new layer of complexity for companies operating in the silicon carbide discrete device value chain. Tariff-led cost pressures have amplified scrutiny of sourcing strategies and accelerated conversations around onshore capacity, as stakeholders weigh the trade-offs between short-term cost impacts and longer-term supply resilience. In response, many organizations have prioritized supplier diversification and contractual provisions that mitigate exposure to sudden trade-policy changes.

The cumulative effect of these trade measures is visible across multiple decision vectors. Purchasing teams are increasingly leveraging multi-sourcing agreements and near-shoring to reduce single-country dependency, while engineering and operations groups are recalibrating qualification timelines to accommodate alternative suppliers and packaging partners. Meanwhile, component assemblers and OEMs are re-evaluating total cost of ownership frameworks to account for the operational and logistical implications of tariff-driven cost differentials.

Importantly, tariff dynamics have also influenced capital allocation decisions. Firms with strategic mandates for vertical integration have accelerated investments in domestic assembly and testing capabilities to insulate critical programs from trade disruptions. At the same time, international suppliers are enhancing direct engagement with key customers through joint development agreements and localized support to preserve market access and minimize the friction caused by the new trade landscape.

In-depth segmentation insights revealing how device types, voltage classes, applications, and end-user industries uniquely shape selection criteria and qualification pathways

Segmentation analysis reveals distinct technical and commercial dynamics that inform device selection, procurement strategies, and product development priorities. Based on Device Type, key considerations differentiate Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor decisions-where ruggedness and high-current capability matter-from Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistor choices that prioritize switching speed and efficiency, while power modules introduce complexity around thermal design and integration, and Schottky diodes are selected for their low forward-voltage characteristics in rectification stages. Each device category imposes unique qualification protocols and supply chain constraints that product teams must align with system-level performance targets.

Based on Voltage Rating, design trade-offs vary markedly across high voltage, medium voltage, and low voltage classes; high-voltage devices emphasize robustness under stress and insulation strategies, medium-voltage solutions balance switching losses with package parasitics, and low-voltage components optimize for minimal conduction losses and compact form factors. Application-driven segmentation shows that Electric Vehicles demand high-power, thermally efficient solutions suitable for automotive qualification cycles, Industrial Motors require devices tolerant of harsh operating conditions and long service life, Power Conversion systems prioritize high-frequency switching and electromagnetic compatibility, and Solar Power applications focus on reliability and wide ambient temperature performance.

Based on End-User Industries, adoption pathways diverge: Aerospace & Defense programs demand rigorous qualification and traceability; Automobile OEMs emphasize cost, space, and integration with battery systems; Consumer Electronics prioritize miniaturization and thermal management for compact power adapters; and Energy & Power players focus on grid compatibility, long-term reliability, and system-level efficiency. Understanding how these segmentation axes overlap enables stakeholders to target investments and technical roadmaps that align device selection with application-specific constraints and regulatory expectations.

A regional intelligence summary that explains how Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific each influence supply chain resilience, qualification, and strategic priorities

Regional dynamics have a profound impact on supply chains, qualification practices, and commercial strategy for silicon carbide discrete devices. In the Americas, stakeholders are focusing on strengthening domestic assembly, testing infrastructure, and technical ecosystems that support automotive electrification and industrial modernization programs. These efforts are tied to broader objectives around supply resilience and reducing lead-time risk for mission-critical applications, which in turn influence procurement cycles and capital deployment.

Europe, Middle East & Africa present a differentiated landscape where regulatory emphasis on energy efficiency, grid stability, and automotive decarbonization drives demand for high-performance devices. Regional policy incentives and industrial programs have encouraged collaboration between device manufacturers and systems integrators, resulting in localized design-in activities and higher expectations for environmental compliance and sustainable manufacturing practices.

Asia-Pacific continues to be a hub for wafer production and component assembly, with a dense supplier base and well-established electronics manufacturing ecosystems. However, recent strategic shifts are prompting diversification within the region, with suppliers and OEMs balancing cost advantages against evolving geopolitical and trade considerations. Each region's unique blend of policy, industrial capability, and end-market demand requires tailored commercial strategies and careful alignment of qualification and logistics frameworks.

A corporate strategy overview highlighting how leading players prioritize wafer quality, packaging innovation, partnership-driven design wins, and operational excellence to secure system-level adoption

Company strategies in the silicon carbide discrete device space reveal a common emphasis on integrating materials expertise with system-level partnerships and manufacturing scale. Leading manufacturers are prioritizing investments in wafer quality, back-end packaging, and thermal management to reduce failure modes and improve device consistency for system integration. Strategic partnerships with inverter suppliers and OEMs are becoming a primary route to design wins, as co-development agreements accelerate time-to-market and embed product specifications into vehicle and grid-scale architectures.

Operationally, firms are concentrating on yield improvement programs and expanded testing capability to shorten qualification cycles while meeting stringent industry standards. Intellectual property in epitaxial processes, die layout, and packaging is being defended through targeted patent portfolios, and talent recruitment is emphasizing cross-disciplinary engineers who can bridge physics, power electronics design, and supply chain management. In parallel, some companies are pursuing selective acquisitions to acquire capabilities in module assembly, thermal interface materials, or high-voltage packaging, thereby reducing integration friction for large customers.

Commercially, firms are differentiating through reliability programs, long-term service agreements, and localized support to large OEMs. These initiatives reduce perceived adoption risk and create deeper customer relationships that extend beyond component sales to include technical integration support, warranty frameworks, and aftermarket service planning.

Actionable recommendations that align technology investment, supply chain diversification, and OEM collaboration to accelerate adoption and reduce risk for silicon carbide initiatives

Industry leaders should adopt a coordinated approach that aligns technology investment, supply chain strategy, and customer engagement to capture the full potential of silicon carbide discrete devices. Prioritize cross-functional programs that couple device development with system integration teams so that die-level improvements translate directly into demonstrable efficiency gains and reduced system costs. This alignment will shorten feedback loops between design iterations and field validation, accelerating qualification while preserving product reliability.

Diversification of the supply base and investment in localized assembly and testing capabilities can materially reduce geopolitical and tariff exposure. Establish multi-year supplier engagements with configurable volume commitments and shared yield-improvement targets to secure capacity without forfeiting flexibility. At the same time, expand partnerships with OEMs through co-development contracts that lock in early design wins and create entry barriers for competitors.

Operational recommendations include enhancing test coverage and accelerated life testing to meet stringent application requirements and to support warranty propositions. Invest in talent development programs that cultivate hybrid expertise in wide-bandgap device physics and power systems engineering. Finally, engage proactively with standards bodies and regulatory stakeholders to shape qualification frameworks and to ensure that product roadmaps anticipate compliance needs across major regions.

A transparent research methodology combining primary interviews, technical characterization, patent and policy review, and expert validation to ensure actionable and verifiable insights

The research methodology underpinning this report combines primary technical validation, stakeholder interviews, and multi-source data triangulation to produce robust, application-focused insights. Primary interviews were conducted with power electronics architects, procurement leads, and R&D managers to capture real-world decision criteria and qualification constraints. These qualitative inputs were complemented by laboratory-level device characterization and failure-mode analysis to verify performance attributes under representative operating conditions.

Secondary research included peer-reviewed technical literature, standards documentation, patent landscapes, and public company disclosures to contextualize technology trajectories and to map capability clusters across regions. Data synthesis emphasized cross-validation between independent information sources to reduce bias and to ensure that findings are reproducible and relevant to engineering and commercial audiences. Scenario analysis was used to evaluate how supply chain and policy variables influence strategic choices, and sensitivity checks were applied to ensure conclusions are robust to plausible changes in supply dynamics.

Finally, expert panels reviewed draft conclusions to validate technical assumptions and to refine recommendations, ensuring that the research outputs are actionable for stakeholders involved in procurement, product development, and strategic planning.

A concise conclusion summarizing the technological promise, strategic challenges, and the coordinated actions required to realize silicon carbide's system-level benefits

Silicon carbide discrete devices are at an inflection point where materials innovation, industrial capability, and shifting application demands are converging to reshape power electronics strategy. The technology's intrinsic advantages create opportunities for higher efficiency, reduced thermal burden, and denser power designs across transportation, industrial, and energy applications. Yet realizing these benefits requires coordinated action across device manufacturers, systems integrators, and procurement organizations to address qualification cycles, supply chain complexity, and regional policy variations.

Leadership in this space will be determined by the ability to integrate device-level improvements with system design, to manage geopolitical and tariff-related risks through diversified and localized supply chains, and to build enduring partnerships with OEMs that translate technical differentiation into embedded design wins. By focusing on cross-functional alignment, reliability engineering, and targeted investments in manufacturing capability, organizations can convert silicon carbide's technical promise into sustainable competitive advantage.

The path forward demands disciplined execution: align R&D priorities to system outcomes, secure resilient sourcing arrangements, and embed customer-centric collaboration into commercial models to ensure that silicon carbide solutions deliver measurable benefits at scale.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Silicon Carbide Discrete Devices Market, by Device Type

  • 8.1. Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor
  • 8.2. Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors
  • 8.3. Power Modules
  • 8.4. Schottky Diodes

9. Silicon Carbide Discrete Devices Market, by Voltage Rating

  • 9.1. High Voltage
  • 9.2. Low Voltage
  • 9.3. Medium Voltage

10. Silicon Carbide Discrete Devices Market, by Applications

  • 10.1. Electric Vehicles
  • 10.2. Industrial Motors
  • 10.3. Power Conversion
  • 10.4. Solar Power

11. Silicon Carbide Discrete Devices Market, by End-User Industries

  • 11.1. Aerospace & Defense
  • 11.2. Automobile
  • 11.3. Consumer Electronics
  • 11.4. Energy & Power

12. Silicon Carbide Discrete Devices Market, by Region

  • 12.1. Americas
    • 12.1.1. North America
    • 12.1.2. Latin America
  • 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 12.2.1. Europe
    • 12.2.2. Middle East
    • 12.2.3. Africa
  • 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Silicon Carbide Discrete Devices Market, by Group

  • 13.1. ASEAN
  • 13.2. GCC
  • 13.3. European Union
  • 13.4. BRICS
  • 13.5. G7
  • 13.6. NATO

14. Silicon Carbide Discrete Devices Market, by Country

  • 14.1. United States
  • 14.2. Canada
  • 14.3. Mexico
  • 14.4. Brazil
  • 14.5. United Kingdom
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. France
  • 14.8. Russia
  • 14.9. Italy
  • 14.10. Spain
  • 14.11. China
  • 14.12. India
  • 14.13. Japan
  • 14.14. Australia
  • 14.15. South Korea

15. United States Silicon Carbide Discrete Devices Market

16. China Silicon Carbide Discrete Devices Market

17. Competitive Landscape

  • 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 17.5. ABB Ltd.
  • 17.6. Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited
  • 17.7. CISSOID S.A.
  • 17.8. Coherent Corp.
  • 17.9. Diodes Incorporated
  • 17.10. Fuji Electric Co., Ltd.
  • 17.11. General Electric Company
  • 17.12. GeneSiC Semiconductor Inc. by Navitas Semiconductor, Inc.
  • 17.13. Infineon Technologies AG
  • 17.14. Littelfuse, Inc.
  • 17.15. Micro Commercial Components, Corp.
  • 17.16. Microchip Technology Incorporated
  • 17.17. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
  • 17.18. ON Semiconductor Corporation
  • 17.19. Robert Bosch GmbH
  • 17.20. ROHM Co., Ltd.
  • 17.21. Semikron Danfoss Elektronik GmbH & Co. KG.
  • 17.22. Solitron Devices Inc.
  • 17.23. STMicroelectronics N.V.
  • 17.24. SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES, LTD.
  • 17.25. Toshiba Corporation
  • 17.26. Vishay Intertechnology inc.
  • 17.27. WeEn Semiconductors Co., Ltd
  • 17.28. Wolfspeed, Inc.

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. CHINA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY INSULATED GATE BIPOLAR TRANSISTOR, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY INSULATED GATE BIPOLAR TRANSISTOR, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY INSULATED GATE BIPOLAR TRANSISTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY METAL-OXIDE-SEMICONDUCTOR FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTORS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY METAL-OXIDE-SEMICONDUCTOR FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTORS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY METAL-OXIDE-SEMICONDUCTOR FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTORS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY POWER MODULES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY POWER MODULES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY POWER MODULES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY SCHOTTKY DIODES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY SCHOTTKY DIODES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY SCHOTTKY DIODES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH VOLTAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH VOLTAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH VOLTAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY LOW VOLTAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY LOW VOLTAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY LOW VOLTAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM VOLTAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM VOLTAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM VOLTAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRIC VEHICLES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRIC VEHICLES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRIC VEHICLES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL MOTORS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL MOTORS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL MOTORS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY POWER CONVERSION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY POWER CONVERSION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY POWER CONVERSION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY SOLAR POWER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY SOLAR POWER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY SOLAR POWER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY AEROSPACE & DEFENSE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY AEROSPACE & DEFENSE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY AEROSPACE & DEFENSE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOBILE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOBILE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOBILE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY ENERGY & POWER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY ENERGY & POWER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY ENERGY & POWER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. AMERICAS SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. AMERICAS SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. AMERICAS SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. AMERICAS SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. AMERICAS SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. NORTH AMERICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. NORTH AMERICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. NORTH AMERICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. NORTH AMERICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. NORTH AMERICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. LATIN AMERICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. LATIN AMERICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. LATIN AMERICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. LATIN AMERICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. LATIN AMERICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. EUROPE SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. EUROPE SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. EUROPE SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. EUROPE SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. EUROPE SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. MIDDLE EAST SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. MIDDLE EAST SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. MIDDLE EAST SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. MIDDLE EAST SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. MIDDLE EAST SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. AFRICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. AFRICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. AFRICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. AFRICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. AFRICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. ASIA-PACIFIC SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. ASIA-PACIFIC SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. ASIA-PACIFIC SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. ASIA-PACIFIC SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. ASIA-PACIFIC SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. ASEAN SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. ASEAN SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. ASEAN SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. ASEAN SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. ASEAN SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. GCC SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. GCC SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. GCC SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. GCC SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. GCC SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. EUROPEAN UNION SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. EUROPEAN UNION SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. EUROPEAN UNION SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. EUROPEAN UNION SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. EUROPEAN UNION SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. BRICS SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. BRICS SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. BRICS SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. BRICS SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. BRICS SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. G7 SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. G7 SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. G7 SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. G7 SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. G7 SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. NATO SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. NATO SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. NATO SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. NATO SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. NATO SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. UNITED STATES SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. UNITED STATES SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. UNITED STATES SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. UNITED STATES SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. UNITED STATES SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. CHINA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. CHINA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. CHINA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. CHINA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. CHINA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)