查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1962839

海军近程武器防御系统市场：依武器类型、平台类型、安装类型、应用、最终用户划分，全球预测（2026-2032年）

Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market by Weapon Type, Platform Type, Mount Type, Application, End User - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 184 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

预计到 2025 年，海军近程武器系统市场价值将达到 38.4 亿美元，到 2026 年将成长至 42.8 亿美元，到 2032 年将达到 84.5 亿美元，复合年增长率为 11.91%。

主要市场统计数据
基准年 2025 38.4亿美元
预计年份：2026年 42.8亿美元
预测年份：2032年 84.5亿美元
复合年增长率 (%) 11.91%

从作战角度出发的介绍：解释为什么先进的近程武器系统对于多层海上防御和平台生存能力至关重要。

海军作战人员面临日益严峻的威胁情势，速度、精准度和一体化对于海上生存至关重要。敌方能力已从单一领域作战演变为多层次、同步的威胁，包括小型无人驾驶航空器系统群、掠海反舰飞弹和先进导引武器。随着舰艇在远离港口的水域和竞争激烈的沿海地区作战，对能够在数秒内探测、识别和摧毁各种威胁的强大近程防御解决方案的需求已成为一项不容妥协的要求。本文整合了推动舰载近程防御系统重新投资的作战因素，并提出了近程防御架构现代化的整体战略依据。

定向能、感测器融合和分散式作战等领域的技术创新如何从根本上改变海上近程防御战略。

由于技术、作战和地缘政治的同步发展，近海防御格局已发生根本性变化，威胁评估和采购重点也随之重塑。首先，定向能量武器已从概念阶段迈向作战原型阶段，并在对抗小型无人驾驶航空器系统（UAS）方面取得了显着成效。这促使人们重新评估高功率拦截飞弹和模组化安装技术的改进也为这些进步提供了补充，从而产生了适用于不同平台的灵活解决方案。

本分析探讨了美国在 2025 年实施的关税措施如何改变了海军近程防御武器系统 (CIWS) 的采购风险管理、供应链韧性和子系统筹资策略。

美国2025年实施的关税和贸易措施为国防采购计画引入了新的变数，尤其是在供应链跨越国界且依赖专用零件的领域。某些感测器、电力电子产品和精密製造材料的进口成本上升增加了采购风险，促使专案经理重新评估其筹资策略。为此，一些关键供应商加快了关键子系统的在地化进程，扩大了国内供应商发展计划，并加大了对国内双源解决方案的投资，以降低单一来源风险。这些调整与旨在加强国防工业基础的持续措施同步进行，凸显了国家供应链的韧性以及国内製造能力的战略价值。

清晰的洞察力，使武器类别、平台限制和作战最终用户优先事项保持一致，从而能够做出以目标为导向的近程防御武器采购决策。

透过細項分析，我们可以明确整个生态系统中能力优先顺序和投资意图的集中方向，从而提供可操作的洞察。基于武器类型，火炮型、雷射型和飞弹型近程防御武器系统（CIWS）的考量因素有显着差异。火炮型CIWS的性能和物流需求因口径而异，包括30-60毫米系统、30毫米以下的选项以及60毫米以上的安装方式。另一方面，雷射型CIWS项目则以功率等级划分，包括100-150千瓦系统、100千瓦以下的解决方案以及150千瓦以上的系统。这些差异会影响平台电源、温度控管和作战理论。因此，采购团队必须使武器选择与舰载电源架构和任务概况相符。根据平台类型，航空母舰、两栖攻击舰、轻型护卫舰、驱逐舰和护卫舰独特的作战节奏和生存能力要求决定了不同的整合管道和全寿命週期支援模式。换句话说，即使采用相同的近程防御武器系统解决方案，也可能需要不同的配置来适应位移、任务持续时间和人员部署等限制。

美洲、欧洲、中东、非洲和亚太地区的作战差异和工业能力影响近程防御武器系统（CIWS）的采用、维护和互通性。

区域分析揭示了影响近程防御系统采用模式的不同作战压力因素、工业能力和采购行为。在美洲，海军现代化计画强调与盟友的互通性、注重维护管道，并日益关注定向能试验以及传统的动能解决方案，从而推动了优先考虑模组化和与国内供应商合作的筹资策略。在欧洲、中东和非洲，威胁的多样性和沿海地区的复杂性推动了对多功能、可快速部署且能适应区域交战规则和联合行动的近程防御武器系统（CIWS）的需求。同时，国防工业合作框架持续影响出口管制和综合进度安排。在亚太地区，高频作战和争议水域的存在催生了对高吞吐量交战系统、先进感测器融合和分散式交战能力的强劲需求。这加速了对支援高耗能定向能係统的舰载电力和冷却基础设施的投资和实地测试。

综合性公司、专业子系统创新公司和新技术参与企业如何重塑近程防御武器系统供应商的趋势和长期维护预期？

主要整合商、子系统专家和新兴技术供应商之间的竞争表明，实现作战能力的途径多种多样。一些成熟的国防主承包商正专注于全解决方案集成，提供增强型动能拦截系统、火控系统和集成服务，以降低大型平台专案集成的风险。同时，专注于定向能组件、高频宽电感测器和先进电源管理系统的专业供应商正透过推动模组化方法和第三方升级，重塑供应商生态系统。拥有雷射和自主技术商业性背景的新兴参与企业正透过引入低成本原型和迭代测试模型来加速创新週期，从而挑战传统的国防采购节奏。

为经营团队提供切实可行的建议，以加快整合速度，确保供应链的韧性，并将以维护为中心的采购实践制度化，用于CIWS。

产业领导者应推动协调行动，将能力建构与具有韧性的产业实践和运作适应性结合。首先，应优先考虑模组化架构和开放接口，使平台能够以最小的结构改动整合动能武器、定向能量武器和飞弹基础层。这将使舰队能够柔软性进行分阶段升级，并随着技术的成熟更换子系统。其次，应投资扶持国内供应商，并对关键零件实施双重采购，建立供应商认证流程，以降低单点故障风险，并能快速应对地缘政治动盪。第三，应扩大演示验证和实弹测试项目，以检验系统在典型运行环境下的性能，并加快经验教训的总结週期。这些项目应包含盟军互通性测试，以确保多国协同作战能力。

严谨透明的调查方法，结合开放原始码技术检验、专家访谈、以及情境驱动的供应链和能力分析。

本研究整合了公开的技术文献、国防采购政策文件、演示验证专案报告和专家访谈，建构了一个严谨且权威的分析基础。技术评估基于公开演示测试中检验的性能参数、定向能和感测器融合领域的同行评审研究以及製造商的技术简报，并参考了运行后总结和监管指南。供应链和行业分析涵盖了贸易政策文件、供应商公告以及筹资策略的可观察调整，尤其关注关税变化后供应商的本地化和资格认证工作。针对平台整合工程师、专案经理和作战指挥官的专家访谈在匿名条件下进行，旨在获取他们对专案权衡和能力优先事项的坦诚意见。

简洁的结论强调了整合技术、维护和筹资策略对于实现可持续的近程防御武器系统能力优势的重要性。

在日益复杂的威胁、快速成熟的技术以及不断增长的地缘政治压力下，近程防御已成为世界各国海军和海上安全部队的战略重点。现代近程防御武器系统（CIWS）解决方案必须整合到跨平台和跨领域的多层防御架构中，并在杀伤力、反应速度和持久性之间取得平衡。最稳健的筹资策略强调模组化、国内供应商的韧性以及以演示主导的风险缓解措施，从而加快从概念到作战能力的转化速度。透过将技术选择与后勤、训练和采购结构结合，国防领导者可以提供有效的点防御解决方案，在不影响舰队战备或长期经济效益的前提下，增强平台的生存能力。

目录

第一章：序言

第二章：调查方法

  • 调查设计
  • 研究框架
  • 市场规模预测
  • 数据三角测量
  • 调查结果
  • 调查的前提
  • 研究限制

第三章执行摘要

  • 首席体验长观点
  • 市场规模和成长趋势
  • 2025年市占率分析
  • FPNV定位矩阵，2025
  • 新的商机
  • 下一代经营模式
  • 工业蓝图

第四章 市场概览

  • 产业生态系与价值链分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市场展望
  • 市场进入策略

第五章 市场洞察

  • 消费者洞察与终端用户观点
  • 消费者体验基准
  • 机会映射
  • 分销通路分析
  • 价格趋势分析
  • 监理合规和标准框架
  • ESG与永续性分析
  • 中断和风险情景
  • 投资报酬率和成本效益分析

第六章：美国关税的累积影响，2025年

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

第八章：海军近程武器系统市场：依武器类型划分

  • 基于火炮的近程防御武器系统
    • 30～60mm
    • 30毫米或更小
    • 超过 60 毫米
  • 基于雷射的近程防御武器系统
    • 100-150千瓦
    • 小于100千瓦
    • 超过150千瓦
  • 飞弹基近程防御武器系统

第九章：海军近程武器系统市场：依平台类型划分

  • 航空母舰
  • 两栖攻击舰
  • 克尔维特
  • 驱逐舰
  • 护卫舰

第十章：海军近程武器系统市场：依安装类型划分

  • 固定炮塔
  • 模组化的
  • 遥控
  • 旋转式安装类型

第十一章：海军近程武器系统市场：依应用领域划分

  • 防空
  • 反无人机
  • 反导
  • 反舰飞弹

第十二章：海军近程武器系统市场：依最终用户划分

  • 日本海上保全厅
  • 陆战队
  • 海军

第十三章：海军近程武器系统市场：依地区划分

  • 北美洲和南美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

第十四章：海军近程武器系统市场：依类别划分

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第十五章：海军近程武器系统市场：依国家划分

  • 我们
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

第十六章：美国海军舰艇近程武器系统市场

第十七章：中国海军舰艇近程武器系统市场

第十八章 竞争格局

  • 市场集中度分析，2025年
    • 浓度比（CR）
    • 赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数 (HHI)
  • 近期趋势及影响分析，2025 年
  • 2025年产品系列分析
  • 基准分析，2025 年
  • Aselsan AS
  • BAE Systems plc
  • Bharat Dynamics Limited
  • General Dynamics Corporation
  • Hanwha Corporation
  • Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd.
  • Kongsberg Gruppen ASA
  • L3Harris Technologies
  • Leonardo SpA
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation
  • MBDA Inc.
  • Navantia, SA
  • Northrop Grumman Corporation
  • Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd.
  • Raytheon Technologies Corporation
  • Rheinmetall AG
  • RTX Corporation
  • Saab AB
  • Thales Group
  • The Boeing Company
Product Code: MRR-0A38069519DE

The Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market was valued at USD 3.84 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 4.28 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 11.91%, reaching USD 8.45 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 3.84 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 4.28 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 8.45 billion
CAGR (%) 11.91%

An operationally focused introduction framing why advanced close-in weapon systems are now critical to layered maritime defense and platform survivability

Naval operators face an accelerating threat environment where speed, precision, and integration determine survivability at sea. Adversary capabilities have evolved beyond single-domain engagements to layered, simultaneous threats that include swarms of small unmanned aerial systems, sea-skimming anti-ship missiles, and advanced guided munitions. As platforms extend their missions farther from port and operate in contested littorals, the requirement for robust close-in defense solutions that can detect, discriminate, and neutralize diverse threats within seconds has become non-negotiable. This introduction synthesizes the operational drivers prompting renewed investment in shipboard point-defense systems and frames the broader strategic rationale for modernizing close-in defense architectures.

Decision-makers must balance trade-offs among lethality, rules-of-engagement compliance, logistics, and lifecycle sustainment when selecting or upgrading CIWS capabilities. Advances in directed energy, sensor fusion, and autonomous engagement loops have introduced new options, but they also increase integration complexity and demand changes to training, maintenance, and doctrine. Consequently, leaders are increasingly focused on interoperable solutions that align with distributed maritime operations, ensuring that close-in defenses act as an integrated layer within a ship's broader defensive posture rather than as isolated point solutions. This introduction sets expectations for the subsequent analysis by highlighting the operational imperatives, technological levers, and procurement considerations that shape CIWS decisions today.

How breakthroughs in directed energy, sensor fusion, and distributed engagement are catalyzing a fundamental transformation in maritime close-in defense strategies

The landscape for maritime close-in defense has shifted decisively as a result of concurrent technological, operational, and geopolitical trends reshaping threat calculus and acquisition priorities. First, directed-energy weapons have moved from concept to fieldable prototypes with demonstrated track records in countering small unmanned aerial systems, prompting a reassessment of rules of engagement and logistics models for power-dense systems. Second, sensor and data-fusion advances have compressed sensor-to-shooter timelines, enabling multi-sensor cueing and automated engagement chains that reduce human reaction time and increase engagement throughput. These developments are complemented by improvements in guided-kinetic interceptors and modular mount technologies that allow more flexible fit-for-platform solutions.

Operationally, navies are integrating CIWS into distributed networks that prioritize resilience and redundancy. The emergence of collaborative engagement capabilities means CIWS no longer operates in isolation; instead, it participates in a layered defensive architecture that includes longer-range air defenses and off-board sensors. This transition also changes how navies train and certify crews, as operators must now manage both traditional fire-control tasks and oversight of autonomous engagement modes. Geopolitical dynamics, including contested access operations and the proliferation of low-cost precision effects, reinforce the need for rapid fielding pathways and interoperable standards. In short, transformative shifts are stacking technological opportunity on top of operational necessity, accelerating adoption cycles and creating new expectations for lifecycle support and integration.

Analyzing how recent United States tariff measures introduced in 2025 have reshaped procurement risk management, supply chain resilience, and subsystem sourcing strategies for naval CIWS

Tariff policies and trade measures enacted by the United States in 2025 introduced an additional variable into defense procurement planning, particularly where supply chains cross international borders and rely on specialized components. Higher import costs for certain sensors, power electronics, and precision manufacturing inputs have increased procurement risk and prompted program managers to re-evaluate sourcing strategies. In response, some prime contractors accelerated localization of critical subsystems, expanded domestic supplier development programs, and increased investment in dual-source domestic variants to mitigate single-source exposure. These adjustments, occurring alongside ongoing defense industrial base initiatives, have emphasized the resilience of national supply chains and the strategic value of onshore manufacturing capabilities.

Consequently, procurement timelines and contract structures have adapted to prioritize supplier qualification and lifecycle availability over single-vendor cost optimization. Programs that previously relied on integrated foreign subsystems shifted toward architectures that accommodate plug-and-play domestic alternatives, enabling fiscal and operational flexibility while preserving interoperability. The tariff environment also catalyzed closer collaboration between program offices and industrial partners to scope alternative materials and manufacture techniques that maintain performance thresholds without introducing new programmatic risk. Ultimately, the tariff-driven recalibration has reinforced the broader trend toward supply chain resilience and has elevated procurement practices that balance technical ambition with industrial sustainability.

Clear segmentation-driven insights that align weapon classes, platform constraints, and operational end-user priorities to enable fit-for-purpose CIWS procurement decisions

Segmentation analysis yields actionable insights by clarifying where capability priorities and investment appetite concentrate across the ecosystem. Based on Weapon Type, considerations differ markedly among Gun Based CIWS, Laser Based CIWS, and Missile Based CIWS; within Gun Based CIWS the performance and logistics footprint vary across calibers including 30-60 millimeter systems, sub-30 millimeter options, and larger-than-60 millimeter installations, while Laser Based CIWS programs differentiate by power class such as 100-150 kilowatt systems, sub-100 kilowatt solutions, and systems exceeding 150 kilowatts. These distinctions influence platform electrical provisioning, thermal management, and engagement doctrine, so procurement teams must align weapon selection with shipboard power architecture and mission profile. Based on Platform Type, the unique operational tempos and survivability requirements of aircraft carriers, amphibious assault ships, corvettes, destroyers, and frigates drive divergent integration pathways and lifecycle support models, meaning the same CIWS solution may need variant configurations to fit displacement, mission endurance, and crew complement constraints.

Based on End User, the priorities of coast guard units, marine corps formations, and navy fleets create different acceptance criteria; coast guard units often emphasize proportional response and low-collateral engagement profiles, marine corps units prioritize expeditionary logistics and modularity for littoral operations, and navies require sustained high-tempo readiness and interoperability with fleet air-defense schemes. Based on Application, capability emphasis shifts across anti-aircraft, anti-drone, anti-missile, and anti-ship missile missions, which in turn drives investment in sensor fusion, engagement libraries, and interceptor mixes tailored to target speed, radar cross-section, and attack profile. Finally, based on Mount Type, options such as fixed turret, modular, remote operated, and rotary mount influence installation timelines, maintenance access, and upgrade pathways, with modular and remote operated mounts offering accelerated upgrade cycles while fixed turrets can deliver optimized performance at the expense of flexibility. Integrating these segmentation lenses enables program managers to define clear trade spaces and match solutions to operational and industrial constraints.

Regional operational differences and industrial capabilities shaping adoption, sustainment, and interoperability of CIWS across Americas, EMEA, and the Asia-Pacific theaters

Regional intelligence reveals distinct operational stressors, industrial capacities, and acquisition behaviors that influence the adoption patterns for close-in defense systems. In the Americas, naval modernization programs emphasize interoperability with allied architectures, emphasis on sustainment pathways, and growing interest in directed-energy experimentation alongside conventional kinetic solutions, driving procurement strategies that favor modularity and domestic supplier partnerships. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, threat diversity and littoral complexity foster demand for versatile, rapidly deployable CIWS options that can be tailored to regional rules of engagement and coalition operations, while defense industrial cooperation frameworks continue to shape export controls and integration timelines. In the Asia-Pacific, high-tempo operations and contested maritime domains create acute demand signals for high-throughput engagement systems, advanced sensor fusion, and distributed engagement capabilities, prompting accelerated field trials and investments in on-board power and cooling infrastructure to support power-intensive directed-energy systems.

These regional distinctions also influence lifecycle sustainment preferences and training models. For example, operators in certain theaters prioritize low-footprint systems that minimize platform disruptions and enable forward maintenance, whereas others accept more complex installations accompanied by enhanced dockside support and extended training packages. Additionally, interoperability considerations with regional allies and coalition partners shape communications standards, engagement deconfliction protocols, and cooperative sensor sharing arrangements. Recognizing these geographic differentials helps leaders tailor acquisition and industrial strategies to regional operational realities while optimizing cross-theater logistics and coalition integration.

How integrators, specialized subsystem innovators, and emerging technology entrants are reshaping supplier dynamics and long-term sustainment expectations for CIWS

Competitive dynamics among prime integrators, subsystem specialists, and emerging technology providers reveal multiple paths to fieldable capability. Some established defense primes concentrate on full-solution integration, offering hardened kinetic interceptors, fire-control systems, and integration services that reduce program integration risk for large platforms. Simultaneously, specialized suppliers focused on directed-energy components, high-bandwidth electro-optical sensors, and advanced power management systems are altering the supplier ecosystem by enabling modular approaches and third-party upgrades. New entrants with commercial backgrounds in laser technologies or autonomy have accelerated innovation cycles by introducing lower-cost prototypes and iterative testing models that challenge traditional defense procurement rhythms.

Partnerships between primes and innovative suppliers have become the dominant route to reconcile platform-level integration risks with rapid capability insertion. These collaborations often take the form of demonstrator programs and phased qualification pathways that de-risk novel subsystems while preserving long-term sustainment frameworks. At the same time, maintenance, training, and obsolescence management are emerging as decisive differentiators; companies that provide comprehensive through-life support, digital twin tools, and expedited spare-part logistics gain a competitive edge. Procurement officers evaluate suppliers not solely on system lethality but increasingly on their capacity to deliver predictable availability, cybersecurity resilience, and upgrade roadmaps that preserve interoperability across evolving multi-vendor architectures.

Actionable recommendations for executives to accelerate integration, secure resilient supply chains, and institutionalize sustainment-focused procurement practices for CIWS

Industry leaders should pursue a coordinated set of actions that align capability development with resilient industrial practices and operational adaptability. First, prioritize modular architectures and open interfaces so that platforms can integrate kinetic, directed-energy, and missile-based layers without extensive structural modifications. By doing so, fleets gain the flexibility to adopt incremental upgrades and to swap subsystems as technology matures. Second, invest in domestic supplier development and dual sourcing for critical components, and establish supplier qualification corridors that reduce single-point-of-failure risks while enabling faster responsiveness to geopolitical disruptions. Third, expand demonstrator and live-fire testing programs that validate system performance in representative operational conditions and accelerate lessons-learned cycles; these programs should incorporate coalition interoperability trials to ensure multi-nation operability.

Additionally, adopt doctrine and training updates that reflect automation-enabled engagement chains, ensuring personnel are trained to supervise autonomous engagement modes and to intervene effectively when human judgment is required. Leaders should also embed sustainment considerations early in procurement decisions by demanding clear obsolescence management plans and long-term support commitments from suppliers. Finally, ensure procurement structures include performance-based contracting elements that reward demonstrated availability and lifecycle affordability rather than one-time technical performance metrics, thereby aligning supplier incentives with operational readiness and cost-effective sustainment.

A rigorous, transparent research methodology combining open-source technical validation, expert interviews, and scenario-driven supply chain and capability analysis

This research synthesizes open-source technical literature, defense procurement policy documents, demonstrator program reports, and subject-matter expert interviews to construct a rigorous, defensible analytical foundation. Technical assessments relied on validated performance parameters from public demonstrations, peer-reviewed studies on directed energy and sensor fusion, and manufacturer technical briefings, cross-checked against operational after-action summaries and regulatory guidance. Supply chain and industrial analysis incorporated trade policy documents, supplier announcements, and observable adjustments to sourcing strategies, with particular attention to supplier localization and qualification efforts following tariff changes. Expert interviews spanned platform integration engineers, program managers, and operational commanders and were conducted under conditions that preserved anonymity while enabling candid insights into programmatic trade-offs and capability priorities.

Analytical methods included capability gap analysis, risk-based supply chain assessment, and scenario-driven evaluation of integration options. Where possible, technical claims were corroborated across multiple sources to reduce single-source bias. The approach emphasizes transparency about assumptions and the limitations of open-source data, and it highlights where further classified or proprietary information would materially change program-level recommendations. Throughout, the methodology privileges operational relevance and procurement applicability so that findings can inform acquisition planning, capability roadmaps, and industrial-base investment decisions.

Concise conclusion emphasizing the imperative to integrate technology, sustainment, and procurement strategies to achieve enduring CIWS capability advantages

Increased threat sophistication, rapid technological maturation, and geopolitical pressures have combined to make close-in defense a strategic priority for navies and maritime security forces worldwide. Modern CIWS solutions must balance lethality, responsiveness, and sustainment while integrating into layered defense architectures that span platforms and domains. The most resilient acquisition strategies will emphasize modularity, domestic supplier resilience, and demonstrator-driven risk reduction that shortens the time from concept to operational capability. By harmonizing technology selection with logistics, training, and procurement structures, defense leaders can deliver effective point-defense solutions that enhance platform survivability without compromising fleet readiness or long-term affordability.

Moving forward, organizations that invest early in integration standards, power and cooling upgrades, and advanced training paradigms will be positioned to exploit emerging capabilities such as high-energy lasers and autonomous sensor-to-shooter chains. Those choices will determine not only near-term defensive performance but also the agility of fleets to adapt to evolving threat sets over the coming decade.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market, by Weapon Type

  • 8.1. Gun Based Ciws
    • 8.1.1. 30-60 Mm
    • 8.1.2. <30 Mm
    • 8.1.3. >60 Mm
  • 8.2. Laser Based Ciws
    • 8.2.1. 100-150 Kw
    • 8.2.2. <100 Kw
    • 8.2.3. >150 Kw
  • 8.3. Missile Based Ciws

9. Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market, by Platform Type

  • 9.1. Aircraft Carrier
  • 9.2. Amphibious Assault Ship
  • 9.3. Corvette
  • 9.4. Destroyer
  • 9.5. Frigate

10. Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market, by Mount Type

  • 10.1. Fixed Turret
  • 10.2. Modular
  • 10.3. Remote Operated
  • 10.4. Rotary Mount

11. Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market, by Application

  • 11.1. Anti Aircraft
  • 11.2. Anti Drone
  • 11.3. Anti Missile
  • 11.4. Anti Ship Missile

12. Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market, by End User

  • 12.1. Coast Guard
  • 12.2. Marine Corps
  • 12.3. Navy

13. Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market, by Region

  • 13.1. Americas
    • 13.1.1. North America
    • 13.1.2. Latin America
  • 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 13.2.1. Europe
    • 13.2.2. Middle East
    • 13.2.3. Africa
  • 13.3. Asia-Pacific

14. Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market, by Group

  • 14.1. ASEAN
  • 14.2. GCC
  • 14.3. European Union
  • 14.4. BRICS
  • 14.5. G7
  • 14.6. NATO

15. Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market, by Country

  • 15.1. United States
  • 15.2. Canada
  • 15.3. Mexico
  • 15.4. Brazil
  • 15.5. United Kingdom
  • 15.6. Germany
  • 15.7. France
  • 15.8. Russia
  • 15.9. Italy
  • 15.10. Spain
  • 15.11. China
  • 15.12. India
  • 15.13. Japan
  • 15.14. Australia
  • 15.15. South Korea

16. United States Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market

17. China Warship Close-in Defense Weapon System Market

18. Competitive Landscape

  • 18.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 18.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 18.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 18.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 18.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 18.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 18.5. Aselsan A.S.
  • 18.6. BAE Systems plc
  • 18.7. Bharat Dynamics Limited
  • 18.8. General Dynamics Corporation
  • 18.9. Hanwha Corporation
  • 18.10. Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd.
  • 18.11. Kongsberg Gruppen ASA
  • 18.12. L3Harris Technologies
  • 18.13. Leonardo S.p.A.
  • 18.14. Lockheed Martin Corporation
  • 18.15. MBDA Inc.
  • 18.16. Navantia, S.A.
  • 18.17. Northrop Grumman Corporation
  • 18.18. Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd.
  • 18.19. Raytheon Technologies Corporation
  • 18.20. Rheinmetall AG
  • 18.21. RTX Corporation
  • 18.22. Saab AB
  • 18.23. Thales Group
  • 18.24. The Boeing Company

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. UNITED STATES WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 13. CHINA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY 30-60 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY 30-60 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY 30-60 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY <30 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY <30 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY <30 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY >60 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY >60 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY >60 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY 100-150 KW, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY 100-150 KW, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY 100-150 KW, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY <100 KW, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY <100 KW, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY <100 KW, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY >150 KW, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY >150 KW, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY >150 KW, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MISSILE BASED CIWS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MISSILE BASED CIWS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MISSILE BASED CIWS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY AIRCRAFT CARRIER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY AIRCRAFT CARRIER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY AIRCRAFT CARRIER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT SHIP, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT SHIP, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT SHIP, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY CORVETTE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY CORVETTE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY CORVETTE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY DESTROYER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY DESTROYER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY DESTROYER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY FRIGATE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY FRIGATE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY FRIGATE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY FIXED TURRET, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY FIXED TURRET, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY FIXED TURRET, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MODULAR, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MODULAR, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MODULAR, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY REMOTE OPERATED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY REMOTE OPERATED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY REMOTE OPERATED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ROTARY MOUNT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ROTARY MOUNT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ROTARY MOUNT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI AIRCRAFT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI AIRCRAFT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI AIRCRAFT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI DRONE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI DRONE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI DRONE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI MISSILE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI MISSILE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI MISSILE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI SHIP MISSILE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI SHIP MISSILE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY ANTI SHIP MISSILE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COAST GUARD, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COAST GUARD, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COAST GUARD, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MARINE CORPS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MARINE CORPS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MARINE CORPS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. AMERICAS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. AMERICAS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. AMERICAS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. AMERICAS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. AMERICAS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. AMERICAS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. AMERICAS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. AMERICAS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. NORTH AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. NORTH AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. NORTH AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. NORTH AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. NORTH AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. NORTH AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. NORTH AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. NORTH AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. LATIN AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. LATIN AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. LATIN AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. LATIN AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. LATIN AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. LATIN AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. LATIN AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. LATIN AMERICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. EUROPE WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. EUROPE WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. EUROPE WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. EUROPE WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. EUROPE WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. EUROPE WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. EUROPE WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. EUROPE WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. MIDDLE EAST WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. MIDDLE EAST WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. MIDDLE EAST WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. MIDDLE EAST WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. MIDDLE EAST WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. MIDDLE EAST WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. MIDDLE EAST WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. MIDDLE EAST WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. AFRICA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. ASIA-PACIFIC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. ASIA-PACIFIC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. ASIA-PACIFIC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. ASIA-PACIFIC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. ASIA-PACIFIC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. ASIA-PACIFIC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. ASIA-PACIFIC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. ASIA-PACIFIC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. ASEAN WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. ASEAN WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. ASEAN WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. ASEAN WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. ASEAN WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. ASEAN WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. ASEAN WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. ASEAN WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. GCC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. GCC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. GCC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. GCC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. GCC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. GCC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. GCC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. GCC WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. EUROPEAN UNION WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. EUROPEAN UNION WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. EUROPEAN UNION WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. EUROPEAN UNION WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. EUROPEAN UNION WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. EUROPEAN UNION WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. EUROPEAN UNION WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. EUROPEAN UNION WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. BRICS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. BRICS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. BRICS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. BRICS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. BRICS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. BRICS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. BRICS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. BRICS WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. G7 WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. G7 WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. G7 WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. G7 WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. G7 WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. G7 WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. G7 WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. G7 WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. NATO WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. NATO WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. NATO WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. NATO WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. NATO WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. NATO WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. NATO WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. NATO WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. GLOBAL WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. UNITED STATES WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 200. UNITED STATES WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 201. UNITED STATES WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 202. UNITED STATES WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 203. UNITED STATES WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 204. UNITED STATES WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 205. UNITED STATES WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 206. UNITED STATES WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 207. CHINA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 208. CHINA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY WEAPON TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 209. CHINA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY GUN BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 210. CHINA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY LASER BASED CIWS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 211. CHINA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 212. CHINA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 213. CHINA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 214. CHINA WARSHIP CLOSE-IN DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)