查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
2002958

乏核燃料市场：依服务类型、燃料类型、包装及最终用户划分－2026-2032年全球市场预测

Nuclear Spent Fuel Market by Service Type, Fuel Type, Packaging Type, End User - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 186 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

2025年乏核燃料市场价值44.3亿美元，预计2026年将成长至49.8亿美元，年复合成长率为12.57%，到2032年将达到101.5亿美元。

主要市场统计数据
基准年 2025 44.3亿美元
预计年份：2026年 49.8亿美元
预测年份 2032 101.5亿美元
复合年增长率 (%) 12.57%

本文针对相关人员在乏核燃料方面面临的挑战、监管趋势、技术成熟度和策略问题，提出了一个简洁而权威的框架。

乏核燃料的管理已从一项技术性辅助措施发展成为永续核能管理的核心支柱。历史上，该框架主要侧重于长期处置，但现代策略力求在即时安全储存、管理体制以及先进后处理和人工临时储存方案等新技术方法之间取得平衡。政府、产业和研究机构等各相关人员正在巧妙地应对复杂的监管框架、社会期望和技术成熟度，这些因素共同决定了可接受的风险状况和投资重点。

快速的技术、监管和地缘政治变化正在重新定义乏燃料管理的路径，并迫使整个核能价值链进行系统性变革。

乏燃料管理格局正经历一场变革，其驱动力包括技术进步、政策转变以及不断变化的地缘政治优先事项。先进的处理和密封技术正在降低长期辐射风险，并实现更安全的处理；同时，新型材料和改进的容器设计正在延长临时储存系统的使用寿命。同时，人们对包括化学和机械方法在内的后处理的兴趣正在重新燃起，闭式燃料循环的潜力及其对废弃物堆和二次废物流的影响也正在被重新评估。

美国于 2025 年实施的关税措施正在重塑全球乏燃料服务供应链，促使供应商进行策略性重组和风险管理。

美国2025年实施的关税措施正在对全球乏燃料供应链产生实际的影响，采购、物流和技术取得等环节都受到了累积的影响。对进口重型零件和专用包装材料征收的关税增加了关键零件（例如乏燃料容器和运输固定装置）的到货成本，从而影响了新计画计划和维修专案的资金配置决策。因此，专案经理们越来越谨慎地权衡进口高品质零件和加快国内产能建设之间的利弊，以降低贸易政策变化带来的风险。

以细分市场主导的分析揭示了服务模式、燃料特性、包装选择和最终用户概况如何决定策略重点和投资。

以细分市场主导的观点揭示了不同的服务模式、燃料类别、包装选择和终端用户需求如何造就差异化的营运和策略路径。根据服务类型，该领域涵盖预处理、处置、再加工、储存和运输。在预处理方面，重点在于压缩和密封；在处置方面，必须区分地质处置和近地表处置；在再加工方面，化学处理和机械处理有所区别。同样，储存策略分为干式储存和湿式储存，运输规划必须考虑铁路、道路运输和海运。这些服务差异导致了技术规范、监管节点和资本密集度的差异。

美洲、欧洲、中东和非洲以及亚太地区的区域趋势正在为乏燃料管理创造不同的政策方法和基础设施发展路径。

区域背景影响乏燃料管理的政策选择和基础设施发展路径。在美洲，现有的核子反应炉集群、正在进行的退役计划以及相互竞争的工业能力，共同促成了对临时储存方案和公私合营模式的务实考虑。政策讨论通常围绕着位置、社区同意和长期处置的资金筹措机制展开，而技术创新则通常透过研究机构与私人供应商之间的伙伴关係来实现。

营运商、工程公司、技术供应商和政府机构之间的竞争与合作正在重塑乏燃料管理的产业结构。

企业层面的发展趋势是由零件製造、工程服务和系统整合等领域的竞争、专业化和合作伙伴关係共同塑造的。主要参与者包括专业的容器製造商、提供综合临时储存和处置设施的工程、采购和施工 (EPC) 公司、提供处理和再加工流程设计的技术许可方，以及通常负责管理处置资产和监管事务的政府废弃物管理机构。在这个群体中，企业策略行动涵盖了从提供端到端服务的垂直整合，到在先进封装技术和运输物流等高价值领域进行深度专业化。

为乏燃料营运商提供可操作的策略建议，以增强其韧性，加快安全过渡解决方案的实施，并促进永续的长期处置和回收实践。

产业领导者应采取一系列切实有效的措施，以增强专案韧性，并加速推动安全永续的解决方案。首先，应优先开发灵活的临时储存架构，以支援长期可回收性，并便于重新包装，以便日后处置和再处理。投资可扩展的干式储存系统和完善的品质保证流程，将降低营运风险，并提高对不断变化的监管要求的适应能力。其次，实现供应商生态系统多元化，并建立以本地为中心的製造伙伴关係，将有助于降低贸易政策风险和供应链瓶颈。这将减少对单一海外供应商关键部件的依赖，并确保业务连续性。

我们高度透明、跨学科的调查方法，结合了与专家的直接对话、监管审查和技术文献的整合，为我们的研究结果提供了可靠性。

本分析基于跨学科调查方法，结合了与该领域专家的直接对话、对法规结构的详细审查以及对技术文献的系统整合。主要资讯来源是对监管机构、设施运营方、工程专家和物流专家进行的结构化访谈，以了解营运实际情况、许可审批观点和供应链限制因素。此外，还审查了监管文件、许可指南和标准文件，以准确反映区域差异和合规要求。

总结了参与乏核燃料管理和处置的利害关係人的操作经验、政策方向和策略重点。

总而言之，现代乏核燃料管理面临的挑战主要体现在製度、策略以及技术层面。稳健的临时储存方案，结合清晰的处置或选择性后处理蓝图，为长期管理奠定了实际的基础。同时，近期关税措施和地缘政治格局的变化提高了供应链的韧性，这就要求采取积极主动的筹资策略，并更加重视国内或合作伙伴在关键部件製造方面的能力。燃料类型、运作模式、包装设计以及最终用户任务的相互作用，使得专案需求多样化，也进一步凸显了基于细分需求进行规划的重要性。

目录

第一章：序言

第二章：调查方法

  • 调查设计
  • 研究框架
  • 市场规模预测
  • 数据三角测量
  • 调查结果
  • 调查的前提
  • 研究限制

第三章执行摘要

  • 首席主管观点
  • 市场规模和成长趋势
  • 2025年市占率分析
  • FPNV定位矩阵，2025
  • 新的商机
  • 下一代经营模式
  • 产业蓝图

第四章 市场概览

  • 产业生态系与价值链分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市场展望
  • 上市策略

第五章 市场洞察

  • 消费者洞察与终端用户观点
  • 消费者体验基准
  • 机会映射
  • 分销通路分析
  • 价格趋势分析
  • 监理合规和标准框架
  • ESG与永续性分析
  • 中断和风险情景
  • 投资报酬率和成本效益分析

第六章：美国关税的累积影响，2025年

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

第八章 乏核燃料市场：依服务类型划分

  • 预处理
    • 压缩
    • 封装
  • 处理
    • 地质处置
    • 近地面处置
  • 再处理
    • 化学处理
    • 机械加工
  • 贮存
    • 干货储存
    • 湿储存
  • 运输
    • 铁路运输
    • 道路运输
    • 海上运输

第九章 乏核燃料市场：依燃料类型划分

  • 金属燃料
  • 混合氧化物
  • 氧化铀

第十章：乏核燃料市场：依包装类型划分

  • 罐
  • 酒桶
  • 容器

第十一章 乏核燃料市场：依最终用户划分

  • 国防组织
  • 核能发电厂
  • 研究机构

第十二章 乏核燃料市场：依地区划分

  • 北美洲和南美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

第十三章 乏核燃料市场：依类别划分

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第十四章 乏核燃料市场：依国家划分

  • 我们
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

第十五章：美国乏核燃料市场

第十六章：中国的乏核燃料市场

第十七章 竞争格局

  • 市场集中度分析，2025年
    • 浓度比（CR）
    • 赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数 (HHI)
  • 近期趋势及影响分析，2025 年
  • 2025年产品系列分析
  • 基准分析，2025 年
  • AECOM
  • Amentum Holdings, Inc.
  • Babcock International Group PLC
  • Bechtel Corporation
  • BWX Technologies, Inc.
  • China National Nuclear Corporation
  • Enercon Services, Inc.
  • EnergySolutions, Inc.
  • Fluor Corporation
  • Framatome SA
  • GNS Gesellschaft fur Nuklear-Service mbH
  • Hitachi Zosen Corporation
  • Holtec International Inc.
  • Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
  • Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., Ltd.
  • Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
  • NAC International Inc.
  • Orano SA
  • Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
  • Rosatom State Nuclear Energy Corporation
  • SNC-Lavalin Group Inc.
  • Studsvik AB
  • US Ecology, Inc.
  • Veolia Environnement SA
  • Waste Control Specialists LLC
  • Westinghouse Electric Company LLC
Product Code: MRR-957C47F93193

The Nuclear Spent Fuel Market was valued at USD 4.43 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 4.98 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 12.57%, reaching USD 10.15 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 4.43 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 4.98 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 10.15 billion
CAGR (%) 12.57%

A concise yet authoritative framing of nuclear spent fuel challenges, regulatory dynamics, technological maturation, and strategic imperatives for stakeholders

The management of spent nuclear fuel has evolved from a technical afterthought into a central pillar of sustainable nuclear stewardship. Historically framed by long-term disposal aspirations, contemporary strategy now balances immediate safe custody, regulatory compliance, and emerging technological pathways such as advanced reprocessing and engineered interim storage solutions. Stakeholders across government, industry, and research institutions are navigating a complex mosaic of regulatory regimes, public expectations, and technology maturations that together determine acceptable risk profiles and investment priorities.

Consequently, decision-makers must reconcile short-term operational imperatives with multi-decadal containment and disposal responsibilities. This requires harmonizing site-level operations, transport logistics, and end-state planning while remaining responsive to policy shifts and public scrutiny. Transitional approaches that prioritize safe, retrievable interim storage alongside parallel development of deep geological disposal options or selective reprocessing are becoming the pragmatic default for many programs. As a result, strategic planning now emphasizes flexibility, rigorous stakeholder engagement, and the ability to adopt new technologies without compromising regulatory consistency or industrial safety culture.

Rapid technological, regulatory, and geopolitical shifts are redefining spent fuel management pathways and forcing systemic change across the nuclear value chain

The landscape for spent fuel management is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological advances, policy reorientation, and shifting geopolitical priorities. Advanced conditioning and encapsulation techniques are reducing long-term radiological risk and enabling safer handling, while new materials and cask designs are extending the operational lifespan of interim storage systems. At the same time, renewed interest in reprocessing-including chemical and mechanical routes-has prompted reassessment of closed-fuel-cycle opportunities and the implications for waste inventories and secondary waste streams.

Policy and regulatory frameworks are also evolving. Several jurisdictions are clarifying roles for state-owned agencies versus private operators, tightening transport and packaging standards, and accelerating licensing pathways for geological disposal facilities. Geopolitical considerations and supply chain resilience concerns are prompting countries to re-evaluate dependencies for critical components such as casks, canisters, and heavy haul logistics. These combined dynamics are tilting programmatic choices toward more integrated solutions that combine robust interim storage with staged investment in disposal or recycling options, thereby creating multi-pathway strategies that hedge against singular technological or political outcomes.

United States tariff measures in 2025 are reshaping global supply chains for spent fuel services and prompting strategic supplier realignment and risk management

The introduction of United States tariff measures in 2025 has created tangible reverberations across the global spent fuel supply chain, with cumulative effects felt in procurement, logistics, and technology sourcing. Tariffs on imported heavy components and specialized packaging have increased the landed cost of key items such as casks and transport fixtures, which in turn has influenced capital allocation decisions for both new and retrofit projects. As a result, program managers are increasingly weighing the trade-offs between importing premium components and accelerating domestic capacity building to mitigate exposure to trade-policy volatility.

Moreover, tariffs have prompted strategic realignment among suppliers and buyers. Some international vendors have explored localized manufacturing partnerships or licensing arrangements to preserve market access, while buyers have initiated multi-sourcing strategies and longer lead-time procurement planning. In parallel, higher import costs have sharpened the focus on lifecycle cost reduction measures-such as modular design standardization and extended-duration dry storage systems-that can compensate for near-term tariff-driven price pressures. Regulatory authorities and end users are therefore recalibrating procurement specifications and contingency plans, integrating tariff-related risk into vendor pre-qualification and contract structures. These adaptations collectively underscore a broader shift toward supply chain resilience, nearshoring of critical manufacturing, and contractual instruments that allocate trade-policy risk more explicitly between buyers and suppliers.

Segmentation-driven intelligence revealing how service modalities, fuel characteristics, packaging choices, and end-user profiles determine strategic priorities and investments

A segmentation-led perspective reveals how distinct service modalities, fuel categories, packaging choices, and end-user requirements create differentiated operational and strategic pathways. Based on Service Type, the domain encompasses Conditioning, Disposal, Reprocessing, Storage, and Transportation; within Conditioning the focus narrows to Compaction and Encapsulation, while Disposal requires differentiation between Geological Disposal and Near Surface Disposal, and Reprocessing separates Chemical Processing and Mechanical Processing. Storage strategies likewise bifurcate into Dry Storage and Wet Storage, and Transportation planning must account for Rail Transport, Road Transport, and Sea Transport. These service distinctions drive divergent technical specifications, regulatory touchpoints, and capital intensity profiles.

By Fuel Type, decisions vary across Metal Fuel, Mixed Oxide, and Uranium Oxide, each presenting distinct radiochemical characteristics, heat load considerations, and reprocessing potentials that inform conditioning and disposal choices. Packaging Type considerations are dominated by Canister, Cask, and Container options, where material selection, thermal performance, and regulatory acceptance criteria influence lifecycle management. Finally, End User dynamics span Defense Agencies, Nuclear Power Plants, and Research Institutes, each bringing unique mission imperatives, security requirements, and budgetary constraints. Collectively, this segmentation matrix underscores that one-size-fits-all approaches are untenable, and that program design must be customized to the intersection of service, fuel, packaging, and end-user priorities.

Regional dynamics across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific are producing divergent policy approaches and infrastructure deployment pathways for spent fuel

Regional context shapes both policy choices and infrastructure deployment pathways for spent fuel management. In the Americas, a mix of legacy reactor fleets, active decommissioning programs, and competitive industrial capabilities has produced a pragmatic focus on interim storage solutions and private-public collaboration models. Policy debates frequently center on siting, community consent, and financing mechanisms for long-term disposal, while technological innovation is often pursued through partnerships between research institutions and commercial suppliers.

In the Europe, Middle East & Africa region, regulatory harmonization, cross-border transport considerations, and differing national approaches to reprocessing versus disposal drive varied program architectures. Several European states are progressing with geological disposal planning and licensing frameworks, while others maintain extended interim storage strategies coupled with research into advanced conditioning methods. The Middle East and Africa exhibit a diverse capability spectrum, with pockets of advanced regulatory development alongside jurisdictions still establishing foundational frameworks.

The Asia-Pacific region is characterized by rapid deployment of new nuclear capacity in some markets, significant investments in both domestic manufacturing and end-of-life capabilities, and an increasing emphasis on regional collaboration for technical standards. Countries with large nuclear fleets prioritize robust interim storage systems and are exploring accelerated timelines for permanent disposal facilities or selective reprocessing strategies. Across all regions, cross-cutting themes include public engagement, transport corridor planning, and the importance of institutional capacity to manage long-duration stewardship obligations.

Competitive and collaborative behaviors among operators, engineering firms, technology providers, and state agencies are reshaping the industrial landscape for spent fuel management

Company-level dynamics are shaped by a blend of competition, specialization, and collaborative partnerships that span component manufacturing, engineering services, and systems integration. Key players include specialized cask and canister manufacturers, engineering procurement and construction firms that deliver comprehensive interim storage and disposal facilities, technology licensors who provide conditioning and reprocessing process designs, and state-affiliated waste management agencies that often control disposal assets and regulatory engagement. Across these cohorts, strategic behavior varies from vertical integration-where firms offer end-to-end services-to focused specialization in high-value segments such as advanced encapsulation or transport logistics.

Partnership models are increasingly common, with commercial suppliers forming consortia with engineering firms and research institutes to reduce project risk and accelerate licensing. Similarly, long-term service contracts and performance-based arrangements are becoming a feature of procurement strategies, incentivizing suppliers to meet safety and availability targets over extended time horizons. Investment in digital asset management, predictive maintenance, and quality assurance for fabrication and transport activities is also intensifying, reflecting a recognition that operational reliability and regulatory compliance are core competitive differentiators. In aggregate, the industry is trending toward collaborative ecosystems that combine manufacturing scale, technical specialization, and institutional trust.

Actionable strategic recommendations to enhance resilience, accelerate safe interim solutions, and drive sustainable long-term disposal and recycling practices for spent fuel operators

Industry leaders should pursue a set of pragmatic, high-impact actions to strengthen program resilience and accelerate safe, sustainable solutions. First, prioritize development of flexible interim storage architectures that support extended retrievability and facilitate future repackaging for disposal or reprocessing. Investing in scalable dry storage systems and robust quality assurance processes will reduce operational risk and improve adaptability to evolving regulatory requirements. Second, diversify supplier ecosystems and cultivate localized manufacturing partnerships to mitigate trade-policy exposure and supply chain bottlenecks; this reduces dependency on singular foreign sources for critical components and supports continuity of operations.

Third, integrate lifecycle thinking into procurement and contractual frameworks by embedding performance-based incentives, risk-sharing clauses for trade policy impacts, and clear timelines for technology transfer where appropriate. Fourth, enhance stakeholder engagement programs to build social license for siting and transport activities, combining transparent risk communication with community benefit mechanisms. Finally, invest in capability development within regulatory bodies and operating organizations-particularly in areas such as transport safety, long-term monitoring, and waste characterization-to ensure that technical decisions are underpinned by institutional capacity. Together, these actions will help leaders balance near-term operational imperatives with credible long-term stewardship.

Transparent, multidisciplinary research methodology combining primary expert engagement, regulatory review, and technical literature synthesis to underpin credible insights

This analysis is based on a multidisciplinary research methodology that integrates primary engagement with subject-matter experts, detailed review of regulatory frameworks, and systematic synthesis of technical literature. Primary inputs included structured interviews with regulatory officials, facility operators, engineering specialists, and logistics experts to capture operational realities, licensing perspectives, and supply-chain constraints. Regulatory texts, licensing guidance, and standards documentation were reviewed to ensure an accurate representation of jurisdictional differences and compliance requirements.

Technical assessment involved evaluation of conditioning, storage, transport, and disposal technologies against criteria such as safety performance, retrievability, constructability, and interfaces with existing infrastructure. Scenario analysis was used to explore the implications of trade-policy shifts, technological adoption pathways, and variations in fuel characteristics. Throughout the process, cross-validation was employed to reconcile differing expert views and to ensure that conclusions were grounded in verifiable technical and regulatory sources. The methodology emphasizes transparency, reproducibility, and practical relevance to support informed decision-making by program managers and policy makers.

Concluding synthesis that distills operational lessons, policy trajectories, and strategic priorities for stakeholders engaged in spent nuclear fuel management and stewardship

In synthesis, the contemporary challenge of spent fuel management is as much institutional and strategic as it is technical. Robust interim storage solutions, coupled with clear roadmaps for disposal or selective reprocessing, provide the pragmatic foundation for long-term stewardship. Simultaneously, supply chain resilience-heightened by recent tariff measures and geopolitical shifts-necessitates proactive procurement strategies and greater emphasis on domestic or partnered manufacturing capabilities for critical components. The intersection of fuel type, service modality, packaging design, and end-user mission drives divergent program needs, reinforcing the importance of segmentation-aware planning.

Looking forward, success will depend on a balanced approach that maintains operational safety and regulatory compliance while enabling innovation in conditioning, packaging, and transport logistics. Collaborative partnerships that combine technical expertise, manufacturing scale, and institutional credibility can accelerate deployment and enhance public confidence. Ultimately, effective management of spent fuel requires integrated planning, sustained stakeholder engagement, and adaptable contracts that can accommodate evolving technical and policy environments without compromising safety or long-term stewardship obligations.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Nuclear Spent Fuel Market, by Service Type

  • 8.1. Conditioning
    • 8.1.1. Compaction
    • 8.1.2. Encapsulation
  • 8.2. Disposal
    • 8.2.1. Geological Disposal
    • 8.2.2. Near Surface Disposal
  • 8.3. Reprocessing
    • 8.3.1. Chemical Processing
    • 8.3.2. Mechanical Processing
  • 8.4. Storage
    • 8.4.1. Dry Storage
    • 8.4.2. Wet Storage
  • 8.5. Transportation
    • 8.5.1. Rail Transport
    • 8.5.2. Road Transport
    • 8.5.3. Sea Transport

9. Nuclear Spent Fuel Market, by Fuel Type

  • 9.1. Metal Fuel
  • 9.2. Mixed Oxide
  • 9.3. Uranium Oxide

10. Nuclear Spent Fuel Market, by Packaging Type

  • 10.1. Canister
  • 10.2. Cask
  • 10.3. Container

11. Nuclear Spent Fuel Market, by End User

  • 11.1. Defense Agencies
  • 11.2. Nuclear Power Plants
  • 11.3. Research Institutes

12. Nuclear Spent Fuel Market, by Region

  • 12.1. Americas
    • 12.1.1. North America
    • 12.1.2. Latin America
  • 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 12.2.1. Europe
    • 12.2.2. Middle East
    • 12.2.3. Africa
  • 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Nuclear Spent Fuel Market, by Group

  • 13.1. ASEAN
  • 13.2. GCC
  • 13.3. European Union
  • 13.4. BRICS
  • 13.5. G7
  • 13.6. NATO

14. Nuclear Spent Fuel Market, by Country

  • 14.1. United States
  • 14.2. Canada
  • 14.3. Mexico
  • 14.4. Brazil
  • 14.5. United Kingdom
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. France
  • 14.8. Russia
  • 14.9. Italy
  • 14.10. Spain
  • 14.11. China
  • 14.12. India
  • 14.13. Japan
  • 14.14. Australia
  • 14.15. South Korea

15. United States Nuclear Spent Fuel Market

16. China Nuclear Spent Fuel Market

17. Competitive Landscape

  • 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 17.5. AECOM
  • 17.6. Amentum Holdings, Inc.
  • 17.7. Babcock International Group PLC
  • 17.8. Bechtel Corporation
  • 17.9. BWX Technologies, Inc.
  • 17.10. China National Nuclear Corporation
  • 17.11. Enercon Services, Inc.
  • 17.12. EnergySolutions, Inc.
  • 17.13. Fluor Corporation
  • 17.14. Framatome SA
  • 17.15. GNS Gesellschaft fur Nuklear-Service mbH
  • 17.16. Hitachi Zosen Corporation
  • 17.17. Holtec International Inc.
  • 17.18. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
  • 17.19. Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., Ltd.
  • 17.20. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
  • 17.21. NAC International Inc.
  • 17.22. Orano SA
  • 17.23. Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
  • 17.24. Rosatom State Nuclear Energy Corporation
  • 17.25. SNC-Lavalin Group Inc.
  • 17.26. Studsvik AB
  • 17.27. US Ecology, Inc.
  • 17.28. Veolia Environnement S.A.
  • 17.29. Waste Control Specialists LLC
  • 17.30. Westinghouse Electric Company LLC

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY FUEL TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. CHINA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CONDITIONING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CONDITIONING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CONDITIONING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CONDITIONING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY COMPACTION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY COMPACTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY COMPACTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY ENCAPSULATION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY ENCAPSULATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY ENCAPSULATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DISPOSAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DISPOSAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DISPOSAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY NEAR SURFACE DISPOSAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY NEAR SURFACE DISPOSAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY NEAR SURFACE DISPOSAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY REPROCESSING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY REPROCESSING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY REPROCESSING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY REPROCESSING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL PROCESSING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL PROCESSING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL PROCESSING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANICAL PROCESSING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANICAL PROCESSING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANICAL PROCESSING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY WET STORAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY WET STORAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY WET STORAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSPORTATION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSPORTATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSPORTATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSPORTATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY RAIL TRANSPORT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY RAIL TRANSPORT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY RAIL TRANSPORT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY ROAD TRANSPORT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY ROAD TRANSPORT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY ROAD TRANSPORT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY SEA TRANSPORT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY SEA TRANSPORT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY SEA TRANSPORT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY FUEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY METAL FUEL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY METAL FUEL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY METAL FUEL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY MIXED OXIDE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY MIXED OXIDE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY MIXED OXIDE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY URANIUM OXIDE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY URANIUM OXIDE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY URANIUM OXIDE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CANISTER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CANISTER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CANISTER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CASK, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CASK, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CASK, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DEFENSE AGENCIES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DEFENSE AGENCIES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DEFENSE AGENCIES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY RESEARCH INSTITUTES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY RESEARCH INSTITUTES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY RESEARCH INSTITUTES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. AMERICAS NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. AMERICAS NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. AMERICAS NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CONDITIONING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. AMERICAS NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. AMERICAS NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY REPROCESSING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. AMERICAS NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. AMERICAS NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSPORTATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. AMERICAS NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY FUEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. AMERICAS NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. AMERICAS NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CONDITIONING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY REPROCESSING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSPORTATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY FUEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CONDITIONING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY REPROCESSING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSPORTATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY FUEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CONDITIONING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY REPROCESSING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSPORTATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY FUEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. EUROPE NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. EUROPE NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. EUROPE NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CONDITIONING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. EUROPE NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. EUROPE NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY REPROCESSING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. EUROPE NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. EUROPE NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSPORTATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. EUROPE NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY FUEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. EUROPE NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. EUROPE NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. MIDDLE EAST NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. MIDDLE EAST NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. MIDDLE EAST NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CONDITIONING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. MIDDLE EAST NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. MIDDLE EAST NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY REPROCESSING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. MIDDLE EAST NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. MIDDLE EAST NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSPORTATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. MIDDLE EAST NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY FUEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. MIDDLE EAST NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. MIDDLE EAST NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. AFRICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. AFRICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. AFRICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CONDITIONING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. AFRICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. AFRICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY REPROCESSING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. AFRICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. AFRICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSPORTATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. AFRICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY FUEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. AFRICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. AFRICA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. ASIA-PACIFIC NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. ASIA-PACIFIC NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. ASIA-PACIFIC NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CONDITIONING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. ASIA-PACIFIC NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. ASIA-PACIFIC NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY REPROCESSING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. ASIA-PACIFIC NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. ASIA-PACIFIC NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSPORTATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. ASIA-PACIFIC NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY FUEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. ASIA-PACIFIC NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. ASIA-PACIFIC NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. ASEAN NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. ASEAN NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. ASEAN NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CONDITIONING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. ASEAN NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. ASEAN NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY REPROCESSING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. ASEAN NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. ASEAN NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSPORTATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. ASEAN NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY FUEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. ASEAN NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. ASEAN NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. GCC NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. GCC NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. GCC NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CONDITIONING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. GCC NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. GCC NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY REPROCESSING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. GCC NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. GCC NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSPORTATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. GCC NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY FUEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. GCC NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. GCC NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. EUROPEAN UNION NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. EUROPEAN UNION NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. EUROPEAN UNION NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CONDITIONING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. EUROPEAN UNION NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. EUROPEAN UNION NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY REPROCESSING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. EUROPEAN UNION NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. EUROPEAN UNION NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSPORTATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. EUROPEAN UNION NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY FUEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. EUROPEAN UNION NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. EUROPEAN UNION NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. BRICS NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. BRICS NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 200. BRICS NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CONDITIONING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 201. BRICS NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 202. BRICS NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY REPROCESSING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 203. BRICS NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 204. BRICS NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSPORTATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 205. BRICS NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY FUEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 206. BRICS NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 207. BRICS NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 208. G7 NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 209. G7 NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 210. G7 NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CONDITIONING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 211. G7 NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 212. G7 NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY REPROCESSING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 213. G7 NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 214. G7 NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSPORTATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 215. G7 NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY FUEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 216. G7 NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 217. G7 NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 218. NATO NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 219. NATO NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 220. NATO NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CONDITIONING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 221. NATO NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 222. NATO NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY REPROCESSING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 223. NATO NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 224. NATO NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSPORTATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 225. NATO NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY FUEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 226. NATO NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 227. NATO NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 228. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 229. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 230. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 231. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CONDITIONING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 232. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 233. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY REPROCESSING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 234. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 235. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSPORTATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 236. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY FUEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 237. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 238. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 239. CHINA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 240. CHINA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 241. CHINA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY CONDITIONING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 242. CHINA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 243. CHINA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY REPROCESSING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 244. CHINA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 245. CHINA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSPORTATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 246. CHINA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY FUEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 247. CHINA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 248. CHINA NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)