查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
2011649

核能发电厂退役市场：按类型、核子反应炉类型、容量、技术、应用和最终用户划分－2026 - 2032年全球市场预测

Nuclear Decommissioning Market by Type, Reactor Type, Capacity, Technology, Application, End-Users - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 199 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

预计到 2025 年，核能发电厂退役市场价值将达到 75.7 亿美元，到 2026 年将成长至 80.4 亿美元，到 2032 年将达到 117.7 亿美元，复合年增长率为 6.49%。

主要市场统计数据
基准年 2025 75.7亿美元
预计年份：2026年 80.4亿美元
预测年份 2032 117.7亿美元
复合年增长率 (%) 6.49%

为核能发电厂退役的基本要求、技术复杂性、监管压力和相关人员优先事项提供了一个权威框架，为策略决策奠定了基础。

核能发电厂除役领域已发展成为一个复杂的领域，其中严谨的工程设计、监管监督、相关人员参与和长期管理责任相互交织。营运商、监管机构和服务供应商如今面临着核子反应炉老化、安全标准不断演变以及公众监督日益严格的环境——所有这些都要求他们进行周密的规划、具备跨学科能力并持续投入资金。

新的技术、监管和金融变革正在重新定义整个核能退役计划的最佳实践、相关人员的期望和竞争动态。

近年来，一系列变革正在重塑除役计划的构思、资金筹措和执行方式。远端操作和机器人技术的进步已从实验阶段发展成为关键任务工具，有效降低了工作人员的辐射暴露风险，并提高了拆卸作业的精确度。同时，资产记录、辐射测绘和计划管理的数位化显着提高了进度安排和风险管理的可预测性，从而能够实施更严格的成本控制策略。

美国近期推出的关税措施如何改变产业除役计画中的筹资策略、供应链和营运风险管理？

美国新关税措施的实施对供应链、筹资策略以及与逐步淘汰过程相关的成本结构产生了累积影响。由于关税导致进口专用零件、废弃物容器和某些处理系统的成本增加，促使企业重新评估筹资策略，鼓励更多使用国内供应商，并刺激在适宜地区的製造业投资。

对每种类型、核子反应炉等级、容量、技术、应用和所有权结构进行全面的細項分析，揭示其独特的营运、技术和商业要求。

对细分市场的详细分析揭示了计划类型、核子反应炉技术、容量范围、应用技术、最终用途环境和所有权模式如何造成不同的营运和商业需求。基于类型，市场动态在「安全壳」方面存在差异。安全壳本身又可细分为「原位处置」和「场地处置」路径、「即时拆除」（集中安排时间和资源投入）以及「安全储存」（延长监测责任并推迟拆除义务）。基于核子反应炉类型，沸水式反应炉(BWR)、快滋生式反应炉(FBR)、气冷反应器 (GCR)、压水式反应炉(PWR) 以及新兴的小型模组化反应器 (SMR) 的要求差异显着，每种反应器都有其独特的去污、拆除和废弃物管理方案。

北美、欧洲、中东和非洲以及亚太地区的区域趋势和细微的监管差异对退役工作的进行方式和能力的部署方式产生了重大影响。

区域趋势对退役优先事项、法律规范和现有技术能力有显着影响。在美洲，儘管现有的核能发电厂和正在进行的退役计画依然存在，但人们越来越关注国内供应链和具有韧性的采购体系，以减轻国际贸易波动的影响。美洲也拥有健全的长期资金筹措制度架构和日趋成熟的私人服务供应商市场，这些因素共同构成了完善的采购方法和竞争性竞标流程。

深入了解产业竞争力、合作联盟模式以及技术主导的差异化，这些因素决定了除役产业成功的市场定位。

对主要企业和联合体的竞争分析表明，市场格局的特点是先进的工程技术、计划执行能力和差异化的技术组合。成熟的工程建设公司凭藉一体化承包交付、核能安领域的良好记录和大型计划管理经验展开竞争，而专业供应商则透过机器人技术、去污化学和先进废弃物处理技术等利基能力脱颖而出。

采取切实可行的策略和营运措施，以增强组织韧性，优化采购，并加速安全且经济高效的除役计划的执行。

为了因应日益复杂的市场环境并确保长期价值，产业领导者应采取一系列切实可行的措施，使策略与实际情况相符。首先，应优先投资远端操作、机器人技术和数位化计划管理，以减少辐射暴露并提高进度确定性。其次，透过供应商网路多元化和关键零件替代供应商认证，保护计划免受贸易政策波动和单一供应商依赖的影响。

严谨的混合方法研究途径，结合相关人员访谈、技术文献整合和多面向资料匹配，为稳健且可操作的见解奠定了基础。

本分析的调查方法融合了深度访谈、二手文献整合以及严谨的资料三角验证，以确保得出权威且切实可行的见解。深度研究包括对众多行业相关人员进行结构化访谈，这些利益相关者包括业主、服务供应商、技术开发商、监管机构和独立专家，旨在了解营运洞察、采购行为以及新兴风险。

对决定哪些组织能够实现安全、高效且社会可接受的退役结果的技术、监管和商业性要求进行全面审查。

总之，核能发电厂退役正处于一个转折点，技术创新、监管进步和日益复杂的采购流程相互交织，重塑着该计画的最终成果。营运商面临着两种选择：要么投资加速拆除能力建设，要么采取长期储存策略，这两种策略对安全、成本和社区接受度的影响各不相同。同时，机器人技术、数位测绘和先进处理技术的成熟，若能融入综合实施模式，则可望大幅降低实施风险和全生命週期责任。

目录

第一章：序言

第二章：调查方法

  • 调查设计
  • 研究框架
  • 市场规模预测
  • 数据三角测量
  • 调查结果
  • 调查的前提
  • 研究限制

第三章执行摘要

  • 首席体验长观点
  • 市场规模和成长趋势
  • 2025年市占率分析
  • FPNV定位矩阵，2025
  • 新的商机
  • 下一代经营模式
  • 产业蓝图

第四章 市场概览

  • 产业生态系与价值链分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市场展望
  • 上市策略

第五章 市场洞察

  • 消费者洞察与终端用户观点
  • 消费者体验基准
  • 机会映射
  • 分销通路分析
  • 价格趋势分析
  • 监理合规和标准框架
  • ESG与永续性分析
  • 中断和风险情景
  • 投资报酬率和成本效益分析

第六章：美国关税的累积影响，2025年

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

第八章：除役核能发电厂市场：依类型划分

  • 遏制
    • 原位处置
    • 在场地内
  • 即时拆除
  • 安全存放

第九章：依核子反应炉类型分類的除役核能发电厂市场

  • 沸水式反应炉
  • 快滋生式反应炉
  • 气冷反应器
  • 压水式反应炉
  • 小型模组化反应堆

第十章：除役核能发电厂市场：依容量划分

  • 300～800 MWe
  • 超过 800 兆瓦
  • 小于300兆瓦

第十一章：除役核能发电厂市场：依技术划分

  • 去污技术
  • 拆除技术
  • 废弃物处理和处置

第十二章：除役核能发电厂市场：依应用领域划分

  • 工业和医用同位素製造设施
  • 核能发电
  • 研究核子反应炉和试验设施

第十三章：除役核能发电厂市场：依最终用户划分

  • 政府/国家企业
  • 私人公司/公共产业

第十四章：除役核能发电厂市场：依地区划分

  • 北美洲和南美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

第十五章：除役核能发电厂市场：依组别划分

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第十六章：除役核能发电厂市场：依国家划分

  • 我们
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

第十七章：美国核能发电厂除役市场

第十八章：中国核能发电厂除役市场

第十九章 竞争情势

  • 市场集中度分析，2025年
    • 浓度比（CR）
    • 赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数 (HHI)
  • 近期趋势及影响分析，2025 年
  • 2025年产品系列分析
  • 基准分析，2025 年
  • ABB Ltd.
  • AECOM Technology Corporation
  • Alliant Energy Corporation
  • AtkinsRealis Group Inc.
  • ATS Corporation
  • Babcock International Group PLC
  • Bechtel Corporation
  • China National Nuclear Corporation
  • Dominion Energy, Inc.
  • EDF ENERGY LIMITED
  • Enercon Services, Inc.
  • EnergySolutions Inc.
  • Exelon Corporation
  • Fluor Corporation
  • Framatome SA
  • GE Vernova
  • Holtec International, Inc.
  • i3D robotics Ltd
  • KUKA AG
  • Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
  • Northstar Group Services, Inc.
  • NUKEM Technologies Engineering Services GmbH by Muroosystems Corporation
  • NuScale Power, LLC
  • Ontario Power Generation Inc.
  • Orano Technologies SA
  • Sellafield Ltd
  • Studsvik AB
  • Toshiba Energy Systems & Solutions Corporation
  • Veolia Environnement SA
  • Westinghouse Electric Corporation
Product Code: MRR-43676CF426B5

The Nuclear Decommissioning Market was valued at USD 7.57 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 8.04 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 6.49%, reaching USD 11.77 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 7.57 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 8.04 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 11.77 billion
CAGR (%) 6.49%

An authoritative framing of nuclear decommissioning imperatives, technical complexity, regulatory pressures, and stakeholder priorities that set the stage for strategic decision making

The landscape of nuclear decommissioning has matured into a complex intersection of engineering rigor, regulatory oversight, stakeholder engagement, and long-term stewardship responsibilities. Operators, regulators, and service providers now face an environment defined by aging reactor fleets, evolving safety standards, and heightened public scrutiny, which together demand robust planning, cross-disciplinary capabilities, and sustained financial commitment.

Against this backdrop, effective decommissioning strategy requires a balanced approach that integrates technical dismantling pathways with waste management, environmental monitoring, and community engagement. Decision makers must weigh trade-offs among approaches that prioritize speed, cost control, or long-term containment, while ensuring compliance with evolving regulatory frameworks. Furthermore, the necessity of secure materials handling, radiological protection, and validated waste treatment technologies underscores the need for adaptive project governance.

Looking ahead, the industry is also influenced by innovation in dismantling techniques, advances in remote handling and robotics, and improved waste conditioning processes that materially affect project timelines and safety margins. Therefore, a clear, evidence-based introduction to the field helps align stakeholders on priorities and establishes the foundation for subsequent analysis of shifting market dynamics, tariff effects, segmentation nuance, regional variances, and strategic imperatives.

Emerging technological, regulatory, and financial shifts that are redefining best practices, stakeholder expectations, and competitive dynamics across nuclear decommissioning projects

Recent years have produced transformative shifts that are reshaping how decommissioning projects are conceived, funded, and executed. Technological advances in remote operations and robotics have transitioned from experimental deployments to mission-critical tools that reduce worker exposure and improve precision in dismantling tasks. Concurrently, digitalization of asset records, radiological mapping, and project controls has allowed for far greater predictability in schedule and risk management, thereby enabling more rigorous cost containment strategies.

Policy and regulatory evolution is another pivotal shift: nations are increasingly harmonizing safety standards, waste acceptance criteria, and licensing pathways, which compels cross-border collaboration and creates pressure for best-practice convergence. The financial architecture supporting decommissioning is changing as well, with greater emphasis on dedicated funds, insurance structures, and public-private partnerships that distribute long-term liabilities while incentivizing efficient project delivery. These shifts are also steering increased private sector participation in what was historically dominated by state actors.

Finally, stakeholder expectations are rising. Communities and civil society demand transparent engagement, stronger environmental guarantees, and measurable remediation outcomes. As a result, projects that can demonstrate clear environmental restoration, credible waste disposition pathways, and transparent governance are gaining social license and easing regulatory processes. Collectively, these transformative shifts are prompting industry actors to re-evaluate capabilities, partnerships, and investment priorities to remain resilient and responsive.

How recent US tariff measures are reshaping procurement strategies, supply chains, and operational risk management for decommissioning programs across the industry

The introduction of new tariff measures in the United States has produced cumulative effects that ripple across supply chains, procurement strategies, and cost structures associated with decommissioning work. Tariff-driven increases in the cost of imported specialized components, waste containers, and certain treatment systems have catalyzed a reassessment of sourcing strategies, incentivizing greater use of domestic suppliers and spurring localized manufacturing investments where feasible.

In response, project owners are recalibrating procurement windows to insulate long-duration contracts from tariff volatility by negotiating fixed-price arrangements, extending lead times to pre-purchase critical equipment, and diversifying supplier rosters to maintain continuity. At the same time, service providers are adapting by redesigning supply chains, qualifying alternative component families, and accelerating partnerships with local fabricators to manage margin pressure while preserving delivery timelines.

These adaptations are occurring alongside increased regulatory scrutiny on material provenance and certificated supply, prompting additional documentation and quality assurance steps that affect logistics and administrative overhead. Where tariffs intersect with specialized waste processing equipment or cross-border waste transfers, operators are also exploring greater on-site treatment capacities, modularization of systems to simplify customs classification, and strategic stockpiling of critical consumables. Consequently, the tariff environment has become another operational parameter that must be integrated into long-term project planning and risk mitigation frameworks.

Comprehensive segmentation analysis revealing distinctive operational, technical, and commercial imperatives across types, reactor classes, capacities, technologies, applications, and ownership models

A nuanced view of segmentation reveals how different project types, reactor technologies, capacity bands, applied technologies, end-use settings, and ownership models create distinct operational and commercial needs. Based on Type, market dynamics diverge across Entombment, which itself is further studied across In-situ Disposal and On-site pathways, Immediate Dismantling that compresses schedule and resource intensity, and Safe Storage that extends surveillance responsibilities and deferred dismantling obligations. Based on Reactor Type, requirements vary materially between Boiling Water Reactor designs, Fast Breeder Reactor architectures, Gas Cooled Reactor systems, Pressurized Water Reactor units, and the emerging class of Small Modular Reactors, each presenting unique decontamination, dismantling, and waste management profiles.

Based on Capacity, project complexity and resource allocation shift across 300-800 MWe plants, Above 800 MWe large commercial plants, and below 300 MWe smaller units, with larger capacities generally amplifying scale economies but also magnifying radiological inventories and logistical challenges. Based on Technology, differentiation occurs across Decontamination Techniques that reduce contamination levels, Dismantling Technologies that enable segmentation and removal, and Waste Processing & Treatment systems that condition and immobilize legacy streams. Based on Application, operational contexts range from Industrial & Medical Isotope Production Facilities to Nuclear Power Generation Facilities and Research Reactors & Test Facilities, each imposing distinct regulatory pathways and stakeholder expectations. Based on End-Users, governance and procurement profiles diverge between Government/State-Owned Entities and Private Sector/Utilities, influencing funding cadence, transparency requirements, and contracting practices.

Understanding these segmentation axes enables decision makers to align capability investments, tailor service offerings, and prioritize technology adoption paths that reflect the specific risk, regulatory, and commercial dynamics of each cluster.

Regional dynamics and regulatory nuances across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that critically influence decommissioning pathways and capability deployment

Regional dynamics exert a powerful influence on decommissioning priorities, regulatory frameworks, and available technical capabilities. In the Americas, legacy fleets and active decommissioning programs coexist with growing interest in domestic supply chains and resilient procurement to mitigate international trade fluctuations. The Americas also exhibit strong institutional frameworks for long-term funding and a maturing private market of service providers, which collectively shape procurement sophistication and competitive tendering processes.

In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory harmonization, cross-border waste agreements, and strong environmental governance are central themes; the region combines mature Western European programs with evolving strategies in other subregions, where policy alignment and capacity building remain priorities. This region tends to emphasize robust stakeholder consultation processes and rigorous environmental remediation criteria, which in turn influence project timelines and technology selection.

In Asia-Pacific, rapid energy transitions, a mix of legacy reactors and new builds, and expanding technical capabilities drive a diverse set of decommissioning pathways. Several nations in the region are investing in domestic technology development, modular treatment systems, and regional cooperation to address shared waste management challenges. Across all regions, local regulatory nuance, workforce skill availability, and infrastructure constraints determine whether projects prioritize expedited dismantling, prolonged safe storage, or hybrid solutions that balance fiscal, technical, and social objectives.

Insights into industry competitive strengths, collaborative consortium models, and technology-driven differentiation that determine successful market positioning in decommissioning

Competitive dynamics among leading companies and consortiums reveal a market characterized by deep engineering expertise, project delivery capabilities, and differentiated technology portfolios. Established engineering and construction firms compete on the basis of integrated turnkey delivery, nuclear safety credentials, and large-scale project management experience, while specialist providers differentiate through niche capabilities in robotics, decontamination chemistry, and advanced waste conditioning.

Strategic partnerships and joint ventures between engineering houses, technology developers, and waste treatment specialists have become common, enabling consortia to offer end-to-end solutions that reduce interface risks for owners. Companies that invest in R&D to validate remote handling systems, improve decontamination yields, or reduce secondary waste generation generally strengthen their competitive positioning in tenders that prioritize safety and lifecycle cost reduction. Additionally, technology licensors and equipment fabricators play a crucial role by supporting qualification packages and field commissioning, thereby lowering execution risk for project integrators.

Market entrants with strong digital capabilities are also disrupting traditional models by offering advanced project controls, predictive maintenance, and radiological mapping services that compress uncertainty and enhance decision quality. Together, these dynamics favor organizations that can combine technical excellence, rigorous safety culture, and demonstrable track records of successful project delivery.

Actionable strategic and operational steps for organizations to strengthen resilience, optimize procurement, and accelerate safe, cost-conscious decommissioning project execution

To navigate rising complexity and secure long-term value, industry leaders should adopt a series of actionable steps that align strategy with operational realities. First, prioritize investments in remote handling, robotics, and digital project controls to reduce radiological exposure and drive greater schedule certainty. Second, diversify supplier networks and qualify alternate sources for critical components to insulate projects from trade policy volatility and single-source dependencies.

Third, strengthen partnerships across engineering, waste treatment, and fabrication partners to deliver integrated solutions that minimize interface risks and contractual disputes. Fourth, embed rigorous stakeholder engagement programs early in project planning to build social license, expedite permitting, and reduce the likelihood of costly redesigns. Fifth, develop flexible funding and procurement approaches-such as staged contracting and performance-based incentives-that align contractor incentives with safety and schedule outcomes.

Finally, invest in workforce upskilling and knowledge transfer processes to preserve institutional expertise as experienced personnel retire. Combining these measures will enhance resilience, reduce execution risk, and position organizations to capture value from both conventional projects and emerging opportunities in legacy site remediation and modular decommissioning technologies.

A rigorous mixed-methods research approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical literature synthesis, and multi-source triangulation to support robust and actionable findings

The research methodology underpinning this analysis integrates primary interviews, secondary literature synthesis, and rigorous data triangulation to ensure authoritative and actionable findings. Primary research involved structured interviews with a cross-section of industry stakeholders, including owners, service providers, technology developers, regulators, and independent subject matter experts, to capture operational insights, procurement behaviors, and emergent risks.

Secondary research drew on regulatory guidance documents, technical standards, published project case studies, and openly available regulatory filings to validate technical constraints and historical project outcomes. Quantitative triangulation used multiple independent data inputs to corroborate qualitative observations, while scenario analysis helped surface sensitivities around procurement, policy shifts, and technological adoption paths.

Throughout the process, findings were stress-tested for consistency across geographic contexts and reactor typologies, with particular attention to ensuring that recommendations are practical, risk-aware, and aligned with prevailing regulatory frameworks. The methodology emphasizes transparency, reproducibility, and the application of expert judgment where empirical data is limited, thereby supporting confident decision making by industry leaders.

Concluding synthesis of technical, regulatory, and commercial imperatives that will determine which organizations deliver safe, efficient, and socially acceptable decommissioning outcomes

In conclusion, nuclear decommissioning is at an inflection point where technological innovation, regulatory evolution, and procurement complexity converge to reshape program outcomes. Operators face a choice between investing in accelerated dismantling capabilities or adopting extended storage strategies, each with distinct implications for safety, cost, and community acceptance. Meanwhile, the maturation of robotics, digital mapping, and advanced conditioning technologies presents an opportunity to materially reduce execution risk and lifecycle liabilities when deployed within integrated delivery models.

Regulatory alignment and stakeholder transparency remain essential enablers for timely project completion; projects that proactively engage communities and regulators typically experience fewer interruptions and achieve more predictable permitting outcomes. Supply chain considerations, including the effects of tariff measures and the strategic localization of critical components, are increasingly operational levers that can affect schedule and cost trajectories.

Ultimately, organizations that combine technical capability, disciplined procurement, social license, and adaptive financing will be best positioned to deliver safe, efficient, and publicly credible outcomes. These principles should guide strategic planning, capability investments, and partnership decisions as the industry navigates the coming decade of decommissioning activity.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Nuclear Decommissioning Market, by Type

  • 8.1. Entombment
    • 8.1.1. In-situ Disposal
    • 8.1.2. On-site
  • 8.2. Immediate Dismantling
  • 8.3. Safe Storage

9. Nuclear Decommissioning Market, by Reactor Type

  • 9.1. Boiling Water Reactor
  • 9.2. Fast Breeder Reactor
  • 9.3. Gas Cooled Reactor
  • 9.4. Pressurized Water Reactor
  • 9.5. Small Modular Reactors

10. Nuclear Decommissioning Market, by Capacity

  • 10.1. 300-800 MWe
  • 10.2. Above 800 MWe
  • 10.3. below 300 MWe

11. Nuclear Decommissioning Market, by Technology

  • 11.1. Decontamination Techniques
  • 11.2. Dismantling Technologies
  • 11.3. Waste Processing & Treatment

12. Nuclear Decommissioning Market, by Application

  • 12.1. Industrial & Medical Isotope Production Facilities
  • 12.2. Nuclear Power Generation Facilities
  • 12.3. Research Reactors & Test Facilities

13. Nuclear Decommissioning Market, by End-Users

  • 13.1. Government/State-Owned Entities
  • 13.2. Private Sector/Utilities

14. Nuclear Decommissioning Market, by Region

  • 14.1. Americas
    • 14.1.1. North America
    • 14.1.2. Latin America
  • 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 14.2.1. Europe
    • 14.2.2. Middle East
    • 14.2.3. Africa
  • 14.3. Asia-Pacific

15. Nuclear Decommissioning Market, by Group

  • 15.1. ASEAN
  • 15.2. GCC
  • 15.3. European Union
  • 15.4. BRICS
  • 15.5. G7
  • 15.6. NATO

16. Nuclear Decommissioning Market, by Country

  • 16.1. United States
  • 16.2. Canada
  • 16.3. Mexico
  • 16.4. Brazil
  • 16.5. United Kingdom
  • 16.6. Germany
  • 16.7. France
  • 16.8. Russia
  • 16.9. Italy
  • 16.10. Spain
  • 16.11. China
  • 16.12. India
  • 16.13. Japan
  • 16.14. Australia
  • 16.15. South Korea

17. United States Nuclear Decommissioning Market

18. China Nuclear Decommissioning Market

19. Competitive Landscape

  • 19.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 19.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 19.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 19.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 19.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 19.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 19.5. ABB Ltd.
  • 19.6. AECOM Technology Corporation
  • 19.7. Alliant Energy Corporation
  • 19.8. AtkinsRealis Group Inc.
  • 19.9. ATS Corporation
  • 19.10. Babcock International Group PLC
  • 19.11. Bechtel Corporation
  • 19.12. China National Nuclear Corporation
  • 19.13. Dominion Energy, Inc.
  • 19.14. EDF ENERGY LIMITED
  • 19.15. Enercon Services, Inc.
  • 19.16. EnergySolutions Inc.
  • 19.17. Exelon Corporation
  • 19.18. Fluor Corporation
  • 19.19. Framatome SA
  • 19.20. GE Vernova
  • 19.21. Holtec International, Inc.
  • 19.22. i3D robotics Ltd
  • 19.23. KUKA AG
  • 19.24. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
  • 19.25. Northstar Group Services, Inc.
  • 19.26. NUKEM Technologies Engineering Services GmbH by Muroosystems Corporation
  • 19.27. NuScale Power, LLC
  • 19.28. Ontario Power Generation Inc.
  • 19.29. Orano Technologies SA
  • 19.30. Sellafield Ltd
  • 19.31. Studsvik AB
  • 19.32. Toshiba Energy Systems & Solutions Corporation
  • 19.33. Veolia Environnement SA
  • 19.34. Westinghouse Electric Corporation

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY END-USERS, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 13. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 14. CHINA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ENTOMBMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ENTOMBMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ENTOMBMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ENTOMBMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY IN-SITU DISPOSAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY IN-SITU DISPOSAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY IN-SITU DISPOSAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ON-SITE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ON-SITE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ON-SITE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY IMMEDIATE DISMANTLING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY IMMEDIATE DISMANTLING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY IMMEDIATE DISMANTLING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SAFE STORAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SAFE STORAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SAFE STORAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY BOILING WATER REACTOR, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY BOILING WATER REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY BOILING WATER REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FAST BREEDER REACTOR, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FAST BREEDER REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY FAST BREEDER REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GAS COOLED REACTOR, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GAS COOLED REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GAS COOLED REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL MODULAR REACTORS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL MODULAR REACTORS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL MODULAR REACTORS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY 300-800 MWE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY 300-800 MWE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY 300-800 MWE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ABOVE 800 MWE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ABOVE 800 MWE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ABOVE 800 MWE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY BELOW 300 MWE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY BELOW 300 MWE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY BELOW 300 MWE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DECONTAMINATION TECHNIQUES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DECONTAMINATION TECHNIQUES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DECONTAMINATION TECHNIQUES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING TECHNOLOGIES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING TECHNOLOGIES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY DISMANTLING TECHNOLOGIES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE PROCESSING & TREATMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE PROCESSING & TREATMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE PROCESSING & TREATMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL & MEDICAL ISOTOPE PRODUCTION FACILITIES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL & MEDICAL ISOTOPE PRODUCTION FACILITIES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL & MEDICAL ISOTOPE PRODUCTION FACILITIES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION FACILITIES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION FACILITIES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION FACILITIES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY RESEARCH REACTORS & TEST FACILITIES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY RESEARCH REACTORS & TEST FACILITIES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY RESEARCH REACTORS & TEST FACILITIES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY END-USERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT/STATE-OWNED ENTITIES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT/STATE-OWNED ENTITIES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT/STATE-OWNED ENTITIES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRIVATE SECTOR/UTILITIES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRIVATE SECTOR/UTILITIES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY PRIVATE SECTOR/UTILITIES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. AMERICAS NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. AMERICAS NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. AMERICAS NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ENTOMBMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. AMERICAS NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. AMERICAS NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. AMERICAS NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. AMERICAS NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. AMERICAS NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY END-USERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ENTOMBMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. NORTH AMERICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY END-USERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ENTOMBMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. LATIN AMERICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY END-USERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ENTOMBMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY END-USERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. EUROPE NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. EUROPE NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. EUROPE NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ENTOMBMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. EUROPE NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. EUROPE NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. EUROPE NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. EUROPE NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. EUROPE NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY END-USERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. MIDDLE EAST NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. MIDDLE EAST NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. MIDDLE EAST NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ENTOMBMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. MIDDLE EAST NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. MIDDLE EAST NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. MIDDLE EAST NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. MIDDLE EAST NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. MIDDLE EAST NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY END-USERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. AFRICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. AFRICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. AFRICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ENTOMBMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. AFRICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. AFRICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. AFRICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. AFRICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. AFRICA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY END-USERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. ASIA-PACIFIC NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. ASIA-PACIFIC NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. ASIA-PACIFIC NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ENTOMBMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. ASIA-PACIFIC NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. ASIA-PACIFIC NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. ASIA-PACIFIC NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. ASIA-PACIFIC NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. ASIA-PACIFIC NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY END-USERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. ASEAN NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. ASEAN NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. ASEAN NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ENTOMBMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. ASEAN NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. ASEAN NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. ASEAN NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. ASEAN NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. ASEAN NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY END-USERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. GCC NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. GCC NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. GCC NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ENTOMBMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. GCC NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. GCC NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. GCC NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. GCC NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. GCC NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY END-USERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. EUROPEAN UNION NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. EUROPEAN UNION NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. EUROPEAN UNION NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ENTOMBMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. EUROPEAN UNION NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. EUROPEAN UNION NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. EUROPEAN UNION NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. EUROPEAN UNION NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. EUROPEAN UNION NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY END-USERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. BRICS NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. BRICS NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. BRICS NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ENTOMBMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. BRICS NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. BRICS NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. BRICS NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. BRICS NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. BRICS NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY END-USERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. G7 NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. G7 NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. G7 NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ENTOMBMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. G7 NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. G7 NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. G7 NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. G7 NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. G7 NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY END-USERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. NATO NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. NATO NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. NATO NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ENTOMBMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. NATO NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. NATO NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. NATO NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. NATO NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. NATO NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY END-USERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. GLOBAL NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ENTOMBMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY END-USERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. CHINA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. CHINA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. CHINA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY ENTOMBMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. CHINA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY REACTOR TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. CHINA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY CAPACITY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 200. CHINA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 201. CHINA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 202. CHINA NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING MARKET SIZE, BY END-USERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)