查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
2012635

1,4-丁二醇市场：2026-2032年全球市场预测（依产品类型、製造流程、通路、应用及最终用途产业划分）

1,4-Butanediol Market by Type, Production Process, Distribution Channel, Application, End-Use Industry - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 196 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

预计 1,4-丁二醇市场在 2025 年的价值为 38.7 亿美元，在 2026 年成长至 40.6 亿美元，到 2032 年达到 57 亿美元，年复合成长率为 5.67%。

主要市场统计数据
基准年 2025 38.7亿美元
预计年份：2026年 40.6亿美元
预测年份 2032 57亿美元
复合年增长率 (%) 5.67%

简要概述现代化学价值链中 1,4-丁二醇的发展趋势，重点在于供应链压力、原料趋势、监管影响和最终用途依赖性。

全球化学工业正经历快速转型，而1,4-丁二醇则处于先进材料、特殊溶剂和关键性能中间体的交汇点。作为一种用途广泛的二醇，该分子可为许多下游化学反应和聚合物提供原料，其供应链趋势对汽车、涂料、製药和聚合物价值链产生连锁反应。从製造商和分销商到终端用户化合物生产商，经销商都需要清晰、基于证据的相关人员，以了解当前驱动因素、风险因素和战略转折点，这些因素将影响他们近期的采购和创新决策。

重塑 1,4-丁二醇生态系统的关键变革因素包括生产技术的创新、对永续性的需求、下游製程配方的变化以及供应链的本地化。

1,4-丁二醇的市场格局正受到多项变革性变化的影响而重塑，这些变化同时发生且以非线性方式相互作用。生产技术的进步，包括改进的催化製程和可扩展的发酵技术，降低了替代生产商的进入门槛，使新参与企业能够凭藉特定特性而非单纯的成本优势竞争。这种技术成熟度与产业日益关注的全生命週期环境绩效相辅相成，推动采购活动转向更具可追溯性和低碳性的原料来源。

2025 年关税调整如何引发采购即时转变，促使区域产能审查，并加速整个 1,4-丁二醇供应链的策略风险降低。

美国于2025年实施的关税政策，为包括1,4-丁二醇相关前驱物和衍生物在内的化学中间体的国际分销增添了新的复杂性。这项关税调整促使进出口商立即重新评估，采购团队也随之修订采购矩阵，以平衡到货成本、交货前置作业时间和交易对象风险。作为应对措施，许多下游製造商开始短期转向拥有成熟区域分销网络的供应商，即使单价名义上更高，以维持生产的连续性并减轻清关和合规的负担。

一个多维细分框架，用于明确特定应用需求、生产路线、类型差异和分销管道权衡，从而指导策略定位。

要了解市场动态，需要根据下游化学製程、生产方法和商业管道进行细緻的市场区隔。从应用角度来看，需求分析区分了γ-丁内酯和四氢呋喃路线。每条路线都针对不同的配方和聚合物需求，并有其独特的监管和处理要求。这种区分有助于明确供应商的适用性以及对买家的技术服务要求。根据最终用途产业，汽车、涂料、製药和聚合物产业被细分为多个观点。聚合物本身进一步细分为聚酯多元醇、氨纶和热塑性聚氨酯。每个子领域都有特定的性能标准、纯度要求和批间均匀性要求，这些都会影响供应商的选择和价值提案。

美洲、欧洲、中东和非洲以及亚太地区的区域法规结构、供应风险接受度和製造地密度如何塑造差异化的采购和投资策略。

需求推动要素、管理体制和原材料供应方面的区域差异，对企业如何设计供应链和商业策略产生了显着影响。在美洲，由于接近性大规模製造群以及产品组合多元化的机会，区域供应链的韧性成为企业优先考虑的因素。该地区的企业通常优先考虑物流效率和供应商的应对力，以满足短週期生产的需求。在欧洲、中东和非洲，日益严格的监管和对永续发展报告的要求，对采购产生了重大影响，许多买家都在寻求能够支持脱碳努力和生产者延伸责任（EPR）目标的原材料。亚太地区仍然是重要的生产和需求中心，其一体化的石化产业群聚、多元化的能源经济以及密集的製造业生态系统，既创造了规模化发展的机会，也带来了复杂的竞争格局。

生产商和专业公司之间的竞争和策略投资趋势将决定他们能否满足人们对品质、永续性和服务日益增长的期望。

1,4-丁二醇市场的竞争格局呈现出传统化学企业、特种中间体生产商以及利用新型生产通路、技术导向的新兴参与企业的多元化格局。主要企业往往透过结合可靠性、原材料柔软性以及为下游混配生产商提供的全面技术服务来竞争。许多成熟的生产商利用规模经济和一体化的原材料采购网络，确保产品规格的一致性和物流的可靠性。同时，小规模的专业公司则透过高纯度产品、定製配方以及与客户的紧密合作开发来脱颖而出。

为生产商和供应商制定可操作的策略重点，以增强韧性，深化与客户的伙伴关係，并加速永续生产路径。

行业领导企业应采取一系列积极措施，将商业性韧性与创新和永续性目标相结合。首先，他们应优先考虑原材料和生产方式的多元化，以减少对单一来源的依赖，并快速应对关税和贸易中断。这包括投资模组化生产单元，并在必要时评估基于发酵製程的策略伙伴关係。其次，他们应透过将技术支援、法规咨询和品质可追溯性纳入商业合同，提升供应商的价值提案。这些服务可以降低客户转换成本，并加强长期合作关係。

采用混合方法研究途径，结合相关人员访谈、技术文献综述和政策分析，对生产和供应链动态进行了多方面的检验。

本执行摘要的研究基础扎实，透过结合质性综合分析以及一手和二手研究资料收集，为本文提出的见解奠定了坚实的基础。一手资料包括对上游生产商、经销商和下游复合材料製造商的采购经理、研发经理和销售经理进行的结构化访谈，从而直接观点采购因素、技术限制和服务期望。此外，还进行了技术文献综述，检验了催化合成和发酵技术的最新进展、杂质谱以及材料适用性研究，以证明其应用适用性。

简洁策略建议强调，要协调技术能力、灵活采购和服务差异化，以确保在不断发展的 1,4-丁二醇市场中保持长期竞争力。

总而言之，1,4-丁二醇目前的市场环境受到技术创新、永续性期望和贸易政策趋势等多重因素的共同影响。这些因素共同推动着生产体係朝向更灵活的模式转变，供应商服务日益差异化，原料特性与终端用户需求也更加紧密地匹配。积极调整筹资策略、投资多元化生产技术并优先考虑服务主导差异化的决策者，将更有能力应对不确定性，并最大限度地掌握高端定位的新机会。

目录

第一章：序言

第二章：调查方法

  • 调查设计
  • 研究框架
  • 市场规模预测
  • 数据三角测量
  • 调查结果
  • 调查的前提
  • 研究限制

第三章执行摘要

  • 首席主管观点
  • 市场规模和成长趋势
  • 2025年市占率分析
  • FPNV定位矩阵，2025
  • 新的商机
  • 下一代经营模式
  • 产业蓝图

第四章 市场概览

  • 产业生态系与价值链分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市场展望
  • 上市策略

第五章 市场洞察

  • 消费者洞察与终端用户观点
  • 消费者体验基准
  • 机会映射
  • 分销通路分析
  • 价格趋势分析
  • 监理合规和标准框架
  • ESG与永续性分析
  • 中断和风险情景
  • 投资报酬率和成本效益分析

第六章：美国关税的累积影响，2025年

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

第八章 1,4-丁二醇市场：依类型划分

  • 生物衍生
  • 石油衍生的

第九章 1,4-丁二醇市场：依生产流程划分

  • 化学合成
  • 发酵

第十章：1,4-丁二醇市场：依分销通路划分

  • 直销
  • 销售代理

第十一章 1,4-丁二醇市场：依应用领域划分

  • γ-丁内酯
  • 四氢呋喃

第十二章 1,4-丁二醇市场：依最终用途产业划分

  • 车
  • 画
  • 製药
  • 聚合物
    • 聚酯多元醇
    • 氨纶
    • 热塑性聚氨酯

第十三章 1,4-丁二醇市场：依地区划分

  • 北美洲和南美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

第十四章 1,4-丁二醇市场：依组别划分

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第十五章 1,4-丁二醇市场：依国家划分

  • 我们
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

第十六章：美国1,4-丁二醇市场

第十七章：中国1,4-丁二醇市场

第十八章 竞争格局

  • 市场集中度分析，2025年
    • 浓度比（CR）
    • 赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数 (HHI)
  • 近期趋势及影响分析，2025 年
  • 2025年产品系列分析
  • 基准分析，2025 年
  • Ascend Performance Materials LLC
  • Ashland Inc.
  • BASF SE
  • Chang Chun Group
  • China Petrochemical Corporation
  • Dairen Chemical Corporation
  • DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
  • Evonik Industries AG
  • Genomatica, Inc.
  • Grupa Azoty SA
  • Henan Kaixiang Fine Chemical Co., Ltd.
  • Huntsman Corporation
  • Invista Sa rl
  • Jiangsu Hailun Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
  • LANXESS AG
  • LyondellBasell Industries NV
  • Markor Chemicals Group Co., Ltd.
  • Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings Corporation
  • Novamont SpA
  • Saudi International Petrochemical Company
  • Shanxi Sanwei Group Co., Ltd.
  • Solvay SA
  • The Dow Chemical Company
  • Xinjiang Tianye Group Co., Ltd.
Product Code: MRR-43649B5EE3A3

The 1,4-Butanediol Market was valued at USD 3.87 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 4.06 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 5.67%, reaching USD 5.70 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 3.87 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 4.06 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 5.70 billion
CAGR (%) 5.67%

A concise orientation to 1,4-butanediol dynamics that clarifies supply chain pressures, feedstock trends, regulatory influences, and end-use dependencies in modern chemical value chains

The global chemical landscape is undergoing rapid transformation, and 1,4-butanediol sits at an intersection of advanced materials, specialty solvents, and performance-critical intermediates. As a versatile diol, this molecule feeds into a broad set of downstream chemistries and polymers, and its supply chain dynamics ripple across automotive, coatings, pharmaceutical, and polymer value chains. Stakeholders from manufacturers to distributors and end-use formulators require a clear, evidence-based view of current drivers, risk vectors, and strategic inflection points that will shape sourcing and innovation decisions in the near term.

In recent years, innovation in production pathways, rising attention to feedstock sustainability, and evolving regulatory scrutiny on chemical intermediates have collectively reshaped procurement and investment calculus. Consequently, corporates are re-evaluating their supplier footprints, risk mitigation strategies, and backward integration opportunities. This executive summary synthesizes the essential trends affecting production, distribution, and end-use adoption of 1,4-butanediol, providing decision-makers with a concise foundation to align commercial plans and R&D priorities with the prevailing market realities.

Key disruptive forces reshaping the 1,4-butanediol ecosystem including production innovation, sustainability imperatives, shifting downstream formulations, and supply chain regionalization

The landscape for 1,4-butanediol is being reshaped by several transformative shifts that are occurring concurrently and interacting in nonlinear ways. Technological advancements in production, including improved catalytic processes and scalable fermentation techniques, have lowered barriers for alternative producers and enabled new entrants to compete on specialty attributes rather than pure cost. This technical maturation complements heightened industry attention to lifecycle environmental performance, which is steering procurement toward more traceable and lower-carbon feedstock pathways.

At the same time, downstream demand profiles are evolving: polymers and elastomers that rely on 1,4-butanediol intermediates are being reformulated to meet stricter durability and sustainability requirements, prompting closer collaboration between raw material suppliers and formulators. Geopolitical shifts and trade policy volatility have also accelerated interest in regional sourcing strategies, creating incentives for supply chain redundancies and buffer inventories. As these forces converge, companies that adapt by investing in flexible manufacturing, modular capacity, and collaborative R&D partnerships will capture disproportionate advantage, while those that remain reliant on legacy sourcing models risk margin compression and supply interruptions.

Moreover, the industry is seeing a parallel rise in demand for value-added services from suppliers, such as technical support for formulation optimization, regulatory compliance assistance, and supply continuity guarantees. These differentiated services are becoming critical purchasing criteria, particularly for customers operating in highly regulated end-use sectors. Taken together, the transformative shifts signal a move from commoditized trading toward integrated supplier relationships, anchored by sustainability credentials, technical collaboration, and resilient, regionally diversified supply chains.

How the 2025 tariff adjustments triggered immediate procurement shifts, prompted regional capacity considerations, and accelerated strategic de-risking across 1,4-butanediol supply chains

United States tariff policy implemented in 2025 has introduced a new layer of complexity to the international flows of chemical intermediates, including precursors and derivatives linked to 1,4-butanediol. The tariff adjustments prompted immediate recalibration among importers and exporters, with procurement teams revising sourcing matrices to balance landed cost against lead time and counterparty risk. In response, many downstream manufacturers initiated a near-term shift toward suppliers with established regional distribution, even when unit prices were nominally higher, to preserve production continuity and simplify customs and compliance burdens.

Beyond procurement tactics, the tariff changes accelerated strategic conversations about onshore production and capacity rationalization. Firms with the ability to pivot production footprints leveraged contract renegotiations and long-term offtake arrangements to mitigate tariff exposure. Additionally, supply chain managers placed greater emphasis on tariff classification accuracy and origin documentation to minimize unexpected duties and to exploit any applicable trade preference programs. Over time, these adjustments are likely to favor suppliers that can demonstrate transparent origin chains, efficient logistics, and the ability to adapt pricing models to incorporate tariff volatility.

Importantly, the tariff environment also influenced innovation pipelines. Some companies prioritized product formulations and material substitutions that reduced dependency on tariff-exposed imports. Others expedited investments in domestic or nearshore production technologies, including modular reactors and fermentation units, to reduce exposure to cross-border cost swings. As a result, the 2025 tariff landscape did not merely affect transactional economics; it catalyzed structural shifts in sourcing strategy, capital allocation, and product development priorities across the 1,4-butanediol value chain.

A multi-dimensional segmentation framework that clarifies application-specific requirements, production pathways, type distinctions, and channel tradeoffs to guide strategic positioning

Understanding market dynamics requires careful segmentation that aligns with downstream chemistry pathways, production modalities, and commercial channels. By application, demand analysis differentiates between gamma-butyrolactone and tetrahydrofuran pathways, each of which supports distinct formulatory and polymer needs and carries unique regulatory and handling considerations; this distinction informs supply compatibility and technical service requirements for buyers. Based on end-use industry, a granular view segregates automotive, coatings, pharmaceuticals, and polymers, where polymers themselves are further dissected into polyester polyols, spandex, and thermoplastic polyurethane; each subsegment imposes specific performance thresholds, purity expectations, and batch-to-batch consistency demands that influence supplier selection and value propositions.

When assessing type, the market bifurcates into bio-based and petroleum-based offerings, a division that increasingly dictates procurement specifications as sustainability targets and consumer-facing claims grow more consequential. Production process segmentation contrasts chemical synthesis with fermentation; process choice affects impurity profiles, scalability, and cost structures, which in turn shape which end-use applications a feedstock can viably support. Finally, distribution channel segmentation differentiates direct sales from distributor-led models, each offering tradeoffs between contractual security, technical support depth, and logistic flexibility. Together, these segmentation lenses enable nuanced go-to-market strategies, targeted product development, and tailored commercial propositions that resonate with discrete customer cohorts across the value chain.

How regional regulatory frameworks, supply risk tolerance, and manufacturing density in the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific shape differentiated sourcing and investment strategies

Regional variations in demand drivers, regulatory regimes, and feedstock availability materially influence how businesses design their supply chains and commercial strategies. In the Americas, proximity to large manufacturing clusters and portfolio diversification opportunities makes regional supply resilience a priority, and companies there often prioritize logistic efficiency and supplier responsiveness to meet fast-cycle production demands. Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency and sustainability reporting expectations exert substantial influence on procurement, with many buyers seeking feedstocks that support decarbonization commitments and extended producer responsibility goals. The Asia-Pacific region remains a pivotal production and demand hub, where integrated petrochemical complexes, varied energy economics, and dense manufacturing ecosystems create both opportunities for scale and complexity in competitive dynamics.

These regional distinctions inform investments in local production, inventory management, and technical support capabilities. For instance, regulatory frameworks in Europe, Middle East & Africa may incentivize greener production pathways and closer manufacturer-supplier collaboration on compliance, whereas commercial sensitivity to price and scale in Asia-Pacific often favors cost-efficient, high-throughput producers. Meanwhile, companies operating in the Americas frequently balance considerations of nearshoring and trade policy exposure to ensure continuity for automotive and polymer customers. Recognizing these regional nuances enables suppliers to design differentiated value propositions that address localized risk tolerances, regulatory obligations, and customer service expectations.

Competitive positioning and strategic investment trends among producers and specialty players that determine who can meet rising quality, sustainability, and service expectations

Competitive dynamics in the 1,4-butanediol landscape reflect a mix of legacy chemical producers, specialty intermediates manufacturers, and technologically focused entrants exploiting novel production pathways. Leading players tend to compete on a combination of reliability, feedstock flexibility, and the depth of technical service they provide to downstream formulators. Many incumbent producers leverage scale and integrated feedstock access to offer consistent product specifications and secure logistics, while smaller, specialty-focused firms differentiate through high-purity grades, tailored formulations, and closer co-development with customers.

Capital investment patterns reveal that companies prioritizing modular, decarbonized production routes are gaining strategic visibility from customers seeking lower lifecycle impacts. At the same time, distributors and commercial intermediaries maintain an essential role in aggregating demand across small and medium-sized end-users, enabling suppliers to reach a broader customer base without replicating sales infrastructure. Strategic alliances and joint ventures have emerged as common mechanisms to combine technical expertise with market access, and firms that invest in digital platforms for order visibility, quality traceability, and compliance documentation are better positioned to win long-term contracts. Ultimately, firms that integrate reliability with demonstrable sustainability credentials and robust customer support are most likely to command premium positioning in a market where service differentiation increasingly complements product quality.

Actionable strategic priorities for producers and suppliers to strengthen resilience, deepen customer partnerships, and accelerate sustainable production pathways

Industry leaders should pursue a set of proactive measures that align commercial resilience with innovation and sustainability goals. First, prioritize diversification of feedstock and production modalities to reduce single-source exposure and to enable rapid response to tariff or trade disruptions. This includes investing in modular production units and evaluating strategic partnerships for fermentation-based routes where appropriate. Second, enhance supplier value propositions by embedding technical support, regulatory advisory, and quality traceability into commercial contracts; such services reduce switching costs for customers and reinforce long-term relationships.

Third, accelerate product stewardship initiatives by documenting lifecycle footprints and collaborating with downstream customers to validate application-specific performance for bio-based and alternative-process derived materials. Fourth, develop regionally calibrated logistics and inventory strategies that reflect local regulatory landscapes and end-user lead times; this ensures that supply continuity is maintained without unnecessarily inflating working capital. Finally, foster cross-functional collaboration between commercial, technical, and compliance teams to translate market intelligence into product roadmaps and contracting approaches. Executed together, these measures will enhance responsiveness to market shifts, improve customer retention, and position firms to capture value from premium service and sustainable product attributes.

A mixed-methods research approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical literature review, and policy analysis to triangulate insights on production and supply chain dynamics

The research behind this executive summary combined qualitative synthesis with primary and secondary evidence gathering to form a robust foundation for the insights herein. Primary input included structured interviews with procurement leaders, R&D heads, and commercial managers across upstream producers, distributors, and downstream formulators, which provided direct perspectives on procurement drivers, technical constraints, and service expectations. These interviews were complemented by technical literature reviews that examined advances in catalytic synthesis and fermentation technologies, impurity profiles, and material compatibility studies that inform application suitability.

Secondary sources included regulatory filings, trade policy announcements, and industry publications that informed analysis of tariff impacts and regional regulatory pressures. Data triangulation was applied to reconcile differing viewpoints and validate observed trends; where divergent perspectives emerged, the analysis prioritized operational realities cited by supply chain and manufacturing stakeholders. Throughout, methodological rigor emphasized transparency in assumptions, clear delineation between observed behavior and interpretive insight, and sensitivity to regional variation in regulatory and commercial practices. This mixed-methods approach supports conclusions that are grounded in practitioner experience while being informed by technical and policy contexts relevant to 1,4-butanediol dynamics.

Concise strategic takeaways that emphasize aligning technical capability, flexible sourcing, and service differentiation to secure long-term advantage in the evolving 1,4-butanediol landscape

In summary, the current environment for 1,4-butanediol is characterized by converging pressures from technological innovation, sustainability expectations, and trade policy dynamics. These forces are collectively prompting a transition toward more flexible production footprints, differentiated supplier services, and tighter alignment between raw material characteristics and end-use requirements. Decision-makers that proactively adapt procurement strategies, invest in diversified production technologies, and emphasize service-led differentiation will be best positioned to navigate uncertainty and to capitalize on emerging opportunities for premium positioning.

Looking ahead, the imperative is clear: integrate technical capability with commercial agility. By doing so, organizations can ensure supply continuity, meet evolving regulatory and customer expectations, and maintain competitive advantage in a market where the interplay of feedstock origin, production process, and end-use performance increasingly determines long-term commercial success.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. 1,4-Butanediol Market, by Type

  • 8.1. Bio Based
  • 8.2. Petroleum Based

9. 1,4-Butanediol Market, by Production Process

  • 9.1. Chemical Synthesis
  • 9.2. Fermentation

10. 1,4-Butanediol Market, by Distribution Channel

  • 10.1. Direct Sales
  • 10.2. Distributors

11. 1,4-Butanediol Market, by Application

  • 11.1. Gamma Butyrolactone
  • 11.2. Tetrahydrofuran

12. 1,4-Butanediol Market, by End-Use Industry

  • 12.1. Automotive
  • 12.2. Coatings
  • 12.3. Pharmaceuticals
  • 12.4. Polymers
    • 12.4.1. Polyester Polyols
    • 12.4.2. Spandex
    • 12.4.3. Thermoplastic Polyurethane

13. 1,4-Butanediol Market, by Region

  • 13.1. Americas
    • 13.1.1. North America
    • 13.1.2. Latin America
  • 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 13.2.1. Europe
    • 13.2.2. Middle East
    • 13.2.3. Africa
  • 13.3. Asia-Pacific

14. 1,4-Butanediol Market, by Group

  • 14.1. ASEAN
  • 14.2. GCC
  • 14.3. European Union
  • 14.4. BRICS
  • 14.5. G7
  • 14.6. NATO

15. 1,4-Butanediol Market, by Country

  • 15.1. United States
  • 15.2. Canada
  • 15.3. Mexico
  • 15.4. Brazil
  • 15.5. United Kingdom
  • 15.6. Germany
  • 15.7. France
  • 15.8. Russia
  • 15.9. Italy
  • 15.10. Spain
  • 15.11. China
  • 15.12. India
  • 15.13. Japan
  • 15.14. Australia
  • 15.15. South Korea

16. United States 1,4-Butanediol Market

17. China 1,4-Butanediol Market

18. Competitive Landscape

  • 18.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 18.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 18.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 18.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 18.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 18.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 18.5. Ascend Performance Materials LLC
  • 18.6. Ashland Inc.
  • 18.7. BASF SE
  • 18.8. Chang Chun Group
  • 18.9. China Petrochemical Corporation
  • 18.10. Dairen Chemical Corporation
  • 18.11. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
  • 18.12. Evonik Industries AG
  • 18.13. Genomatica, Inc.
  • 18.14. Grupa Azoty S.A.
  • 18.15. Henan Kaixiang Fine Chemical Co., Ltd.
  • 18.16. Huntsman Corporation
  • 18.17. Invista S.a r.l.
  • 18.18. Jiangsu Hailun Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
  • 18.19. LANXESS AG
  • 18.20. LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
  • 18.21. Markor Chemicals Group Co., Ltd.
  • 18.22. Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings Corporation
  • 18.23. Novamont S.p.A.
  • 18.24. Saudi International Petrochemical Company
  • 18.25. Shanxi Sanwei Group Co., Ltd.
  • 18.26. Solvay S.A.
  • 18.27. The Dow Chemical Company
  • 18.28. Xinjiang Tianye Group Co., Ltd.

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. UNITED STATES 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 13. CHINA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY BIO BASED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY BIO BASED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY BIO BASED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PETROLEUM BASED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PETROLEUM BASED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PETROLEUM BASED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL SYNTHESIS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL SYNTHESIS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL SYNTHESIS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY FERMENTATION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY FERMENTATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY FERMENTATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DIRECT SALES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DIRECT SALES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DIRECT SALES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTORS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTORS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTORS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY GAMMA BUTYROLACTONE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY GAMMA BUTYROLACTONE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY GAMMA BUTYROLACTONE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TETRAHYDROFURAN, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TETRAHYDROFURAN, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TETRAHYDROFURAN, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYESTER POLYOLS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYESTER POLYOLS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYESTER POLYOLS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY SPANDEX, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY SPANDEX, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY SPANDEX, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY THERMOPLASTIC POLYURETHANE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY THERMOPLASTIC POLYURETHANE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY THERMOPLASTIC POLYURETHANE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. AMERICAS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. AMERICAS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. AMERICAS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. AMERICAS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. AMERICAS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. AMERICAS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. AMERICAS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. NORTH AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. NORTH AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. NORTH AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. NORTH AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. NORTH AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. NORTH AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. NORTH AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. LATIN AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. LATIN AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. LATIN AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. LATIN AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. LATIN AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. LATIN AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. LATIN AMERICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. EUROPE 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. EUROPE 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. EUROPE 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. EUROPE 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. EUROPE 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. EUROPE 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. EUROPE 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. MIDDLE EAST 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. MIDDLE EAST 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. MIDDLE EAST 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. MIDDLE EAST 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. MIDDLE EAST 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. MIDDLE EAST 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. MIDDLE EAST 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. AFRICA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. ASIA-PACIFIC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. ASIA-PACIFIC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. ASIA-PACIFIC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. ASIA-PACIFIC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. ASIA-PACIFIC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. ASIA-PACIFIC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. ASIA-PACIFIC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. ASEAN 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. ASEAN 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. ASEAN 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. ASEAN 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. ASEAN 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. ASEAN 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. ASEAN 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. GCC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. GCC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. GCC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. GCC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. GCC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. GCC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. GCC 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. EUROPEAN UNION 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. EUROPEAN UNION 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. EUROPEAN UNION 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. EUROPEAN UNION 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. EUROPEAN UNION 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. EUROPEAN UNION 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. EUROPEAN UNION 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. BRICS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. BRICS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. BRICS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. BRICS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. BRICS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. BRICS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. BRICS 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. G7 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. G7 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. G7 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. G7 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. G7 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. G7 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. G7 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. NATO 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. NATO 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. NATO 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. NATO 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. NATO 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. NATO 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. NATO 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. GLOBAL 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. UNITED STATES 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. UNITED STATES 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. UNITED STATES 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. UNITED STATES 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. UNITED STATES 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. UNITED STATES 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. UNITED STATES 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. CHINA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. CHINA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. CHINA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION PROCESS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. CHINA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. CHINA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. CHINA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. CHINA 1,4-BUTANEDIOL MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)