查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1906007

水力压裂：市场占有率分析、产业趋势与统计、成长预测（2026-2031）

Hydraulic Fracturing - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2026 - 2031)
出版日期: | 出版商: Mordor Intelligence | 英文 140 Pages | 商品交期: 2-3个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

简介目录

水力压裂市场预计将从 2025 年的 476.3 亿美元成长到 2026 年的 509.8 亿美元，预计到 2031 年将达到 716.6 亿美元，2026 年至 2031 年的复合年增长率为 7.04%。

水力压裂市场-IMG1

持续电气化、即时监测和自动化使井场燃料成本降低了高达 25%，并将分段供油效率提高了 17%。北美成熟的页岩层支撑着当前的需求，而中国和阿根廷的政策支持则刺激了新的油气活动。服务供应商之间的整合正在集中技术所有权，而适度的市场集中度则为拥有利基技术的区域性公司留下了空间。环境法规使水资源管理成本增加了 15% 至 20%，但这些法规也推动了对无水压裂技术的投资，使渗透率提高了几个数量级。

全球水力压裂市场趋势与洞察

页岩气及緻密油开发热潮

预计到2024年，二迭纪盆地緻密油日产量将达到100万桶，证实了对水力压裂服务的长期需求。阿根廷的瓦卡穆埃尔塔组受益于RIGI（投资基础设施投资计画）提供的为期30年的税收稳定方案，该方案降低了超过2亿美元投资的财务风险。在中国，儘管成本不断上升，但直接补贴和基础建设资金维持了压裂作业量。持续的技术创新使主要页岩油产区的营运商能够实现每桶低于40美元的损益平衡成本。这些因素共同支撑了多个大洲压裂设备的高运转率。

全球天然气需求不断成长及燃料转换趋势

国际能源总署（IEA）预测，受电力和工业原料领域从煤炭转向天然气的推动，天然气使用量将在2030年前稳步成长。亚太地区的公共产业正优先发展燃气发电厂以实现气候目标，预计这将促进该地区水力压裂市场的活跃度。工业对石化产品和化肥的需求将进一步扩大传统天然气的产量。近期供应衝击引发的能源安全疑虑促使各国政府鼓励国内天然气生产。持续的需求有助于保障服务公司的合约履行，并抵销大宗商品价格的周期性波动。

水资源限制与环保运动

科罗拉多强制要求新完工的油井必须循环利用80%的水，这使得油井成本增加了高达20%。德拉瓦河流域仍禁止水力压裂，一些欧洲国家也暂停水力压裂作业。法律纠纷延长了审批流程，增加了不确定性。开发商正透过闭合迴路系统和电压裂技术来应对这些挑战，这些技术在避免消耗淡水的同时，可以将渗透率提高几个数量级。虽然资金需求增加，但长期的环境合规性提高了计划的可接受性。

细分市场分析

预计到2025年，水平井将占水力压裂收入的79.85%，其市占率将以8.16%的复合年增长率成长。多层增产措施可提高水平井的采收率，即使在大宗商品价格走软的情况下，也能维持水平井工程的经济吸引力。设计标准化和工厂化作业模式缩短了作业週期，使得水平井完井成为大多数页岩油气产区的标准选择。

雪佛龙的三重压裂工作流程可同时完成多口井的作业，进而减少30%的垫片运作。对所有水平段进行即时感测，可优化丙烷的投放，提高最终采收率并减少丙烷废弃物。垂直井在煤层气和现有油田中仍将发挥一定作用，但其份额预计将持续下降。水平压裂技术密集的特性将增强整个水力压裂产业对整合数位平台的需求。

到2025年，Slickwater将占水力压裂市场收入的56.65%，在竞争激烈的市场环境中仍能支撑其发展。其低黏度可降低泵浦功率，进而提高泵速，降低压裂成本。混合型压裂液结合了泡沫相和凝胶相，尤其适用于干燥盆地，因为它无需大量用水即可改善支撑剂输送，预计其复合年增长率将达到9.02%。

泡沫基压裂液适用于对水敏感的储存，并符合更严格的环保法规。作业者正在试验活性油和二氧化碳基系统以减少消费量。添加剂供应商正在开发低剂量高效能减磨剂，从而提高滑溜水压裂的经济效益。这些进步在拓展水力压裂产业压裂液选择范围的同时，也巩固了滑溜水压裂的核心地位。

水力压裂市场报告按井类型（水平井与垂直井）、流体类型（滑溜水、凝胶基、泡沫基、混合/活性）、支撑剂类型（压裂砂、树脂涂层砂、陶瓷支撑剂）、应用（页岩气、緻密油、煤层气）和地区（北美、欧洲、亚太、南美、中东和非洲）进行细分。

区域分析

北美拥有丰富的页岩资源和成熟的物流网络，预计2025年将占据全球水力压裂市场67.60%的份额。二迭纪盆地以低于每桶40美元的损益平衡成本主导，而加拿大传统天然气和油砂开采活动也进一步增加了服务需求。墨西哥的能源改革带来了新的机会，但基础设施的匮乏在短期内限制了相关活动。电动压裂车队的普及和垫片场自动化正在巩固该地区的技术领先地位和成本竞争力。

亚太地区是成长最快的地区，预计到2031年将以9.95%的复合年增长率成长。中国正在简化页岩气开发的补贴和审批程序，即使在大宗商品价格低迷时期，也维持水力压裂市场的合约。印度正在探索法规结构，以促进大规模盆地开发；澳洲则依靠煤层气和緻密气计划来补充其出口管道。区域成长依赖政府的持续支持和中游投资，以降低市场供应成本。

欧洲受到严格的环境法规和多个国家暂停开采的限制。中东和非洲地区，緻密气和页岩气资源与现有生产基地相契合的地区机会有限。南美洲的前景主要集中在阿根廷的瓦卡穆埃尔塔页岩气田，在米利总统的改革下，该地区资本流入不断增加。在全部区域，基础建设、金融稳定性和当地服务能力将决定水力压裂技术市场普及的速度。

其他福利：

  • Excel格式的市场预测（ME）表
  • 3个月的分析师支持

目录

第一章 引言

  • 研究假设和市场定义
  • 调查范围

第二章调查方法

第三章执行摘要

第四章 市场情势

  • 市场概览
  • 市场驱动因素
    • 页岩气及緻密油开发热潮
    • 全球天然气需求不断成长及燃料转换趋势
    • 多层次水平压裂技术的进步。
    • 中国和阿根廷的政府激励措施
    • 即时光纤和人工智慧驱动的压裂优化
    • 电动压裂车（e-Frac）的快速普及
  • 市场限制
    • 用水限制和环保团体的反对
    • 商品价格波动会削弱获利能力。
    • 禁止采砂扰乱支撑剂供应链
    • 获得与环境、社会及公司治理（ESG）相关的资金管道有限
  • 供应链分析
  • 监管环境
  • 技术展望
  • 波特五力模型
    • 供应商的议价能力
    • 买方的议价能力
    • 新进入者的威胁
    • 替代品的威胁
    • 竞争对手之间的竞争

第五章 市场规模与成长预测

  • 按井类型
    • 水平的
    • 垂直的
  • 按流体类型
    • 滑水
    • 凝胶基
    • 泡沫基
    • 混合/能量型
  • 按支撑剂类型
    • 压裂砂
    • 树脂涂层砂
    • 陶瓷支撑剂
  • 透过使用
    • 页岩气
    • 緻密油
    • 煤炭层气
  • 按地区
    • 北美洲
      • 美国
      • 加拿大
      • 墨西哥
    • 欧洲
      • 德国
      • 英国
      • 义大利
      • 俄罗斯
      • 挪威
      • 其他欧洲地区
    • 亚太地区
      • 中国
      • 印度
      • 韩国
      • 东南亚国协
      • 澳洲
      • 亚太其他地区
    • 南美洲
      • 阿根廷
      • 巴西
      • 其他南美洲
    • 中东和非洲
      • 沙乌地阿拉伯
      • 阿拉伯聯合大公国
      • 南非
      • 奈及利亚
      • 其他中东和非洲地区

第六章 竞争情势

  • 市场集中度
  • 策略性倡议（併购、联盟、购电协议）
  • 市场占有率分析（主要企业的市场排名和份额）
  • 公司简介
    • Halliburton Company
    • Schlumberger Ltd.
    • Baker Hughes Co.
    • Liberty Energy Inc.
    • NexTier Oilfield Solutions Inc.
    • Patterson-UTI（Seventy Seven）
    • Calfrac Well Services Ltd.
    • FTS International Services
    • Archer Ltd.
    • Basic Energy Services
    • RPC Inc.（Cudd Energy）
    • ProPetro Holding Corp.
    • BJ Energy Solutions
    • Trican Well Service Ltd.
    • China Oilfield Services Ltd.
    • Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
    • Weatherford International plc
    • STEP Energy Services
    • Superior Energy Services（Frac Tech）
    • SD Energy

第七章 市场机会与未来展望

简介目录
Product Code: 50485

The Hydraulic Fracturing market is expected to grow from USD 47.63 billion in 2025 to USD 50.98 billion in 2026 and is forecast to reach USD 71.66 billion by 2031 at 7.04% CAGR over 2026-2031.

Hydraulic Fracturing - Market - IMG1

Continued electrification, real-time monitoring, and automation reduce wellsite fuel costs by up to 25% and improve stage-delivery efficiency by 17%. Mature shale plays in North America underpin current demand, while policy support in China and Argentina accelerates new activity. Consolidation among service providers concentrates technology ownership, yet moderate market concentration leaves space for regional firms with niche capabilities. Environmental regulations raise water-management costs by 15-20%, but the same rules spur investment in waterless fracturing methods that enhance permeability by several orders of magnitude.

Global Hydraulic Fracturing Market Trends and Insights

Shale Gas & Tight-Oil Development Boom

Tight-oil output in the Permian Basin is expected to reach 1 million barrels per day in 2024, underscoring the long-term demand for hydraulic fracturing market services. Argentina's Vaca Muerta formation benefits from 30-year tax stability under the RIGI regime, which lowers fiscal risk for investments above USD 200 million. China maintains direct subsidies and infrastructure funding that sustain fracturing volumes despite higher costs. Operators in premier shale plays achieve breakeven costs below USD 40 per barrel through continuous technology upgrades. These factors collectively support high utilization of fracturing fleets across multiple continents.

Rising Global Gas Demand & Fuel-Switching

The International Energy Agency expects natural-gas use to climb steadily to 2030, bolstered by coal-to-gas switching for power and industrial feedstocks.Asia-Pacific utilities are favoring gas-fired plants to meet their climate goals, which is expected to lift regional hydraulic fracturing market activity. Industrial demand for petrochemicals and fertilizers further expands unconventional gas production. Energy-security concerns following recent supply shocks prompt governments to encourage domestic gas production. Sustained demand underpins contract visibility for service companies, offsetting the periodic fluctuations in commodity prices.

Water-Use Restrictions & Environmental Opposition

Colorado now requires 80% water recycling for new completions, increasing well costs by up to 20%. The Delaware River Basin maintains a ban on fracking, and several European nations have imposed moratoria. Legal challenges prolong permitting and heighten uncertainty. Operators respond with closed-loop systems and electro-fracturing techniques that avoid freshwater consumption while boosting permeability by several magnitudes. Capital needs rise, but long-term environmental compliance improves project acceptability.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

  1. Advances in Multi-Stage Horizontal Fracturing
  2. Government Incentives in China & Argentina
  3. Commodity-Price Volatility Hurting Well Economics

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Horizontal wells represented 79.85% of 2025 revenue, and their share of the hydraulic fracturing market size is projected to rise alongside an 8.16% CAGR. Multi-stage stimulation of extended laterals lifts recovery per well, keeping horizontal programs economically attractive even when commodity prices soften. Factory-style operations standardize designs and shorten cycle time, making horizontal completions the default choice in most shale plays.

Chevron's triple-frac workflow enables the completion of several wells in parallel, reducing pad days by 30%. Real-time sensing along the entire lateral tunes proppant placement, increasing ultimate recovery and lowering proppant waste. Vertical wells retain niche roles in coal-bed methane and legacy fields, but will continue losing share. The technology-intensive nature of horizontal fracturing strengthens demand for integrated digital platforms across the hydraulic fracturing industry.

Slick-water held 56.65% revenue in 2025, anchoring the hydraulic fracturing market despite competition. Its low viscosity reduces pumping horsepower and allows higher pump rates, cutting stage costs. Hybrid fluids, which combine foams or gels, are forecast to grow at a 9.02% CAGR by improving proppant transport without requiring large water volumes, a benefit particularly in arid basins.

Foam-based fluids serve water-sensitive reservoirs and comply with stricter environmental regulations. Operators experiment with energized oils and CO2-based systems to limit water consumption. Additive suppliers refine friction reducers that work at lower dosages, enhancing slick-water economics. These developments broaden fluid choices within the hydraulic fracturing industry while preserving the core position of slick-water.

The Hydraulic Fracturing Market Report is Segmented by Well Type (Horizontal and Vertical), Fluid Type (Slick-Water, Gel-Based, Foam-Based, and Hybrid/Energized), Proppant Type (Frac Sand, Resin-Coated Sand, and Ceramic Proppants), Application (Shale Gas, Tight Oil, and Coal-Bed Methane), and Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and Middle East and Africa).

Geography Analysis

North America commanded 67.60 of % hydraulic fracturing market share in 2025, supported by prolific shale resources and mature logistics. The Permian Basin leads with breakeven costs below USD 40 per barrel, while Canada's unconventional gas and oil-sands activity adds depth to service demand. Mexico's energy reforms open prospects, though near-term activity remains limited by infrastructure gaps. Widespread adoption of electric fleets and pad-level automation reinforces the region's technology leadership and cost competitiveness.

Asia-Pacific region is the fastest-growing region, with a 9.95% CAGR projected through 2031. China directs subsidies and streamlined permits toward shale gas development, sustaining hydraulic fracturing market contracts even during commodity downturns. India evaluates regulatory frameworks that could unlock sizeable basins, while Australia relies on coal-bed methane and tight-gas projects to fill export pipelines. Regional growth hinges on ongoing government support and midstream investment that lowers delivered cost to market.

Europe remains constrained by strict environmental rules, with several nations imposing moratoria. The Middle East and Africa show selective opportunities where tight-gas or shale resources align with existing production hubs. South America's outlook centers on Argentina's Vaca Muerta, now drawing increased capital under President Milei's reforms. Across all emerging regions, infrastructure development, fiscal stability, and local service capabilities will determine the pace of hydraulic fracturing market adoption.

  1. Halliburton Company
  2. Schlumberger Ltd.
  3. Baker Hughes Co.
  4. Liberty Energy Inc.
  5. NexTier Oilfield Solutions Inc.
  6. Patterson-UTI (Seventy Seven)
  7. Calfrac Well Services Ltd.
  8. FTS International Services
  9. Archer Ltd.
  10. Basic Energy Services
  11. RPC Inc. (Cudd Energy)
  12. ProPetro Holding Corp.
  13. BJ Energy Solutions
  14. Trican Well Service Ltd.
  15. China Oilfield Services Ltd.
  16. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
  17. Weatherford International plc
  18. STEP Energy Services
  19. Superior Energy Services (Frac Tech)
  20. SD Energy

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 Research Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Shale gas & tight-oil development boom
    • 4.2.2 Rising global gas demand & fuel-switching
    • 4.2.3 Advances in multi-stage horizontal fracturing
    • 4.2.4 Government incentives in China & Argentina
    • 4.2.5 Real-time fiber-optic & AI-driven frac optimization
    • 4.2.6 Rapid adoption of electric frac fleets (e-Frac)
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Water-use restrictions & environmental opposition
    • 4.3.2 Commodity-price volatility hurting well economics
    • 4.3.3 Sand-mining bans disrupting proppant supply chain
    • 4.3.4 ESG-linked capital access constraints
  • 4.4 Supply-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Porter's Five Forces
    • 4.7.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.7.3 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5 Market Size & Growth Forecasts

  • 5.1 By Well Type
    • 5.1.1 Horizontal
    • 5.1.2 Vertical
  • 5.2 By Fluid Type
    • 5.2.1 Slick-water
    • 5.2.2 Gel-based
    • 5.2.3 Foam-based
    • 5.2.4 Hybrid/Energized
  • 5.3 By Proppant Type
    • 5.3.1 Frac Sand
    • 5.3.2 Resin-Coated Sand
    • 5.3.3 Ceramic Proppants
  • 5.4 By Application
    • 5.4.1 Shale Gas
    • 5.4.2 Tight Oil
    • 5.4.3 Coal-Bed Methane
  • 5.5 By Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
      • 5.5.1.1 United States
      • 5.5.1.2 Canada
      • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 Europe
      • 5.5.2.1 Germany
      • 5.5.2.2 United Kingdom
      • 5.5.2.3 Italy
      • 5.5.2.4 Russia
      • 5.5.2.5 Norway
      • 5.5.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.3 Asia-Pacific
      • 5.5.3.1 China
      • 5.5.3.2 India
      • 5.5.3.3 South Korea
      • 5.5.3.4 ASEAN Countries
      • 5.5.3.5 Australia
      • 5.5.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4 South America
      • 5.5.4.1 Argentina
      • 5.5.4.2 Brazil
      • 5.5.4.3 Rest of South America
    • 5.5.5 Middle East and Africa
      • 5.5.5.1 Saudi Arabia
      • 5.5.5.2 United Arab Emirates
      • 5.5.5.3 South Africa
      • 5.5.5.4 Nigeria
      • 5.5.5.5 Rest of Middle East and Africa

6 Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves (M&A, Partnerships, PPAs)
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis (Market Rank/Share for key companies)
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 Halliburton Company
    • 6.4.2 Schlumberger Ltd.
    • 6.4.3 Baker Hughes Co.
    • 6.4.4 Liberty Energy Inc.
    • 6.4.5 NexTier Oilfield Solutions Inc.
    • 6.4.6 Patterson-UTI (Seventy Seven)
    • 6.4.7 Calfrac Well Services Ltd.
    • 6.4.8 FTS International Services
    • 6.4.9 Archer Ltd.
    • 6.4.10 Basic Energy Services
    • 6.4.11 RPC Inc. (Cudd Energy)
    • 6.4.12 ProPetro Holding Corp.
    • 6.4.13 BJ Energy Solutions
    • 6.4.14 Trican Well Service Ltd.
    • 6.4.15 China Oilfield Services Ltd.
    • 6.4.16 Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
    • 6.4.17 Weatherford International plc
    • 6.4.18 STEP Energy Services
    • 6.4.19 Superior Energy Services (Frac Tech)
    • 6.4.20 SD Energy

7 Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-Space & Unmet-Need Assessment