Guidehouse Insights 排行榜报告：资产绩效管理 (APM) - 评估公用事业 APM 解决方案的九家领先供应商的策略和执行情况

鑑于 APM 范围内的大量需求和不断增长的模组列表，设备效能管理 (APM) 系统的竞争格局是独一无二的。因此，由传统 OEM（通用电气 [GE Digital]、施耐德电气、日立能源）和专业软体供应商（IBM、mPrest、DNV、SAP、IPS Energy、Bentley Systems）组成的供应商池规模较小。变得更加复杂。

这些 APM 供应商以传统创新（例如模组化、基于微服务的设计原则）为基础，并拥抱广泛的前瞻性业务和技术支点。产品和策略路线图因供应商而异，但包括架构转型（可扩展性、开放性、互通性）、重新思考定价和部署模型、简化更新框架、调整传输和分配操作、行动扩展、云端支持以及其他大趋势常见的。

Guidehouse Insights 排行榜报告检查了九家领先公司的电网 APM 解决方案，并将它们相互比较，以确定哪些供应商为公用事业客户提供最有用的 APM 解决方案。

目录

第1章 摘要整理

第2章 市场概要

• 市场定义
• 推动市场要素
• 阻碍市场要素
• 市场趋势

第3章 Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard

• Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard的类别
  • 领导者
  • 竞争者
  • 挑战者
  • 追随者
• Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard的电网

第4章 企业排行榜

• 领导者
  • GE Vernova
  • Schneider Electric
  • IBM
• 竞争者
  • Hitachi Energy
  • mPrest
  • DNV
  • SAP
  • IPS Energy
  • Bentley Systems

第5章 缩写·简称的一览

第6章 目录

第7章 图表

第8章 分析范围·手法

The competitive landscape for asset performance management (APM) systems is unique given the extensive requirements and growing list of modules captured under the APM umbrella. Over time, this has led to a smaller, more refined pool of vendors made up of traditional OEMs (General Electric [GE Digital], Schneider Electric, Hitachi Energy) and specialized software providers (IBM, mPrest, DNV, SAP, IPS Energy, Bentley Systems).

These APM providers are building upon conventional innovations (e.g., modular, microservices-based design principles) with a wide mix of forward-looking business and technology reorientations. While product and strategy roadmaps naturally vary by vendor, common macrotrends include architectural transformations (i.e., scalable, open, interoperable), revamped pricing and deployment models, streamlined upgrade frameworks, coordinated transmission and distribution operations, mobile extensions, and cloud enablement, among many others.

This Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard report examines the grid APM solutions from nine leading companies and measures them against one another, to determine which are providing the most useful APM solutions to utility customers.

Top Vendors

1. GE Vernova

2. Schneider Electric

3. IBM

4. Hitachi Energy

5. mPrest

6. DNV

7. SAP

8. IPS Energy

9. Bentley Systems

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

• 1.1 Market Introduction
• 1.2 The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid

2. Market Overview

• 2.1 Market Definition
• 2.2 Market Drivers
• 2.3 Market Barriers
• 2.4 Market Trends

3. The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard

• 3.1 The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Categories
  • 3.1.1 Leaders
  • 3.1.2 Contenders
  • 3.1.3 Challengers
  • 3.1.4 Followers
• 3.2 The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid

4. Company Rankings

• 4.1 Leaders
  • 4.1.1 GE Vernova
  • 4.1.2 Schneider Electric
  • 4.1.3 IBM
• 4.2 Contenders
  • 4.2.1 Hitachi Energy
  • 4.2.2 mPrest
  • 4.2.3 DNV
  • 4.2.4 SAP
  • 4.2.5 IPS Energy
  • 4.2.6 Bentley Systems

5. Acronym and Abbreviation List

6. Table of Contents

7. Table of Charts and Figures

8. Scope of Study and Methodology

• 8.1 Scope of Study
• 8.2 Sources and Methodology
  • 8.2.1 Vendor Selection
  • 8.2.2 Ratings Scale
    • 8.2.2.1 Score Calculations
  • 8.2.3 Criteria Definitions
    • 8.2.3.1 Strategy
    • 8.2.3.2 Execution

List of Tables

• Grid APM Spending by Region, World Markets: 2022-2031

The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Overall Scores

IBM Maximo Application Suite APM Modules

Key DNV Cascade Modules

Key IPS APM Modules

Key Bentley Systems AssetWise Modules

Vendor Scores

Vendor Scores on Strategy Criteria

Vendor Scores on Execution Criteria

List of Figures

The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid

• Grid APM Spending by Region, World Markets: 2022-2031

GE Vernova Strategy and Execution Scores

Schneider Electric Strategy and Execution Scores

IBM Strategy and Execution Scores

Hitachi Energy Strategy and Execution Scores

mPrest Strategy and Execution Scores

DNV Strategy and Execution Scores

SAP Strategy and Execution Scores

IPS Energy Strategy and Execution Scores

Bentley Systems Strategy and Execution Scores