Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Report:DAC (Direct Air Capture) 企业 - 13 家 DAC 公司的策略和执行能力评估
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1328596

Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Report:DAC (Direct Air Capture) 企业 - 13 家 DAC 公司的策略和执行能力评估

Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Report - Direct Air Capture Companies: Assessment of Strategy and Execution for 13 Direct Air Capture Companies

出版日期: | 出版商: Guidehouse Insights | 英文 49 Pages; 18 Tables, Charts & Figures | 订单完成后即时交付

价格

DAC(直接空气捕获)等碳去除技术将在全球推动减缓气候变迁方面发挥重要作用。DAC 透过直接从空气中吸收二氧化碳来使用再生电力运行,与永久二氧化碳储存相结合,成为负排放技术。捕获的二氧化碳也可用于减少其他部门的排放。

DAC计画目前约占营运中的碳捕集、利用和封存计画的5%,但它们规模极小,仅占全球二氧化碳捕集能力的不到0.02%。大多数 DAC 专案规模如此之小的原因之一是技术相对不成熟,尚未经过测试和最佳化。到 2015 年,全球仅有四家 DAC 公司在营运。然而,在过去五年中,拥有新技术和创新方法的第二代公司已经进入该领域。阻碍 DAC 广泛使用的另一个因素是其高成本。一些 DAC 公司旨在透过规划大型专案来利用规模经济来降低成本,而其他公司则选择模组化方法,根据需要部署额外的单元,以最大限度地降低初始专案成本。

Guidehouse Insights 排行榜检查了 13 家领先公司的 DAC 产品,并对它们进行比较,以确定哪些公司提供最有用的 DAC 解决方案。

目录

第1章 摘要整理

第2章 市场概要

  • 市场定义
  • 推动市场要素
  • 阻碍市场要素
  • 市场趋势

第3章 Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard

  • Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard的类别
    • 领导者
    • 竞争者
    • 挑战者
    • 追随者
  • Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard的电网

第4章 企业排行榜

  • 领导者
    • Climeworks
  • 竞争者
    • Carbon Engineering
    • Global Thermostat
    • Baker Hughes/Mosaic Materials
    • CarbonCapture
    • Aircapture
    • Carbyon
    • Noya
    • Prometheus Fuels
  • 挑战者
    • Mission Zero
    • Verdox
    • Sustaera
    • Carbominer

第5章 缩写·简称的一览

第6章 目录

第7章 图表

第8章 分析范围·手法

Product Code: LB-CREC-23

Carbon removal technologies such as direct air capture (DAC) will play a key role in the global push for climate change mitigation. By sucking CO2 directly from the air, DAC can be a negative emissions technology when run on renewable electricity and coupled with permanent CO2 storage. Alternatively, the captured CO2 can be used to reduce emissions from other sectors.

DAC projects currently account for about 5% of the carbon capture utilization and sequestration projects in operation, but the projects are very small scale, representing less than 0.02% of total installed global CO2 capture capacity. One reason most DAC projects are so small is that the technology is relatively immature and still undergoing testing and optimization. By 2015, only four DAC companies were operating around the world. Over the last five years, however, a flood of second-generation companies has entered the space with new and innovative technologies and approaches. Another impediment to DAC uptake is its high costs. While some DAC companies aim to cut expenses by planning large-scale projects to leverage economies of scale, others are taking a modular approach, preferring to deploy additional units as necessary in order to minimize initial upfront costs for a project.

This Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard examines the DAC offerings from 13 leading companies and measures them against one another to determine which are providing the most useful DAC solutions.

Top 10 Vendors

1. Climeworks

2. Carbon Engineering

3. Global Thermostat

4. Baker Hughes/Mosaic

5. CarbonCapture

6. Aircapture

7. Carbyon

8. Noya

9. Prometheus Fuels

10. Mission Zero

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

  • 1.1 Market Introduction
  • 1.2 Vendor Selection
  • 1.3 The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid

2. Market Overview

  • 2.1 Market Definition
  • 2.2 Market Drivers
  • 2.3 Market Barriers
  • 2.4 Market Trends

3. The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard

  • 3.1 The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Categories
    • 3.1.1 Leaders
    • 3.1.2 Contenders
    • 3.1.3 Challengers
    • 3.1.4 Followers
  • 3.2 The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid

4. Company Rankings

  • 4.1 Leaders
    • 4.1.1 Climeworks
  • 4.2 Contenders
    • 4.2.1 Carbon Engineering
    • 4.2.2 Global Thermostat
    • 4.2.3 Baker Hughes/Mosaic Materials
    • 4.2.4 CarbonCapture
    • 4.2.5 Aircapture
    • 4.2.6 Carbyon
    • 4.2.7 Noya
    • 4.2.8 Prometheus Fuels
  • 4.3 Challengers
    • 4.3.1 Mission Zero
    • 4.3.2 Verdox
    • 4.3.3 Sustaera
    • 4.3.4 Carbominer
  • 4.4 Followers

5. Acronym and Abbreviation List

6. Table of Contents

7. Table of Charts and Figures

8. Scope of Study and Methodology

  • 8.1 Scope of Study
  • 8.2 Sources and Methodology
    • 8.2.1 Vendor Selection
    • 8.2.2 Ratings Scale
      • 8.2.2.1 Score Calculations
    • 8.2.3 Criteria Definitions
      • 8.2.3.1 Strategy
      • 8.2.3.2 Execution

List of Figures

The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid: Direct Air Capture Companies

Climeworks Strategy and Execution Scores

Carbon Engineering Strategy and Execution Scores

Global Thermostat Strategy and Execution Scores

Baker Hughes/Mosaic Materials Strategy and Execution Scores

CarbonCapture Strategy and Execution Scores

Aircapture Strategy and Execution Scores

Carbyon Strategy and Execution Scores

Noya Strategy and Execution Scores

Prometheus Fuels Strategy and Execution Scores

Mission Zero Strategy and Execution Scores

Verdox Strategy and Execution Scores

Sustaera Strategy and Execution Scores

Carbominer Strategy and Execution Scores