查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1771307

自动无菌取样市场：产业趋势与全球预测 - 依监测方法、生物製程方法、工作量、扩展性、主要区域

Automatic Aseptic Sampling Market: Industry Trends and Global Forecasts - Distribution by Type of Monitoring Method, Bioprocessing Method, Working Volume, Scalability and Key Geographical Regions
出版日期: | 出版商: Roots Analysis | 英文 197 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

全球自动无菌取样市场：概览

预计2035年，全球自动无菌取样市场规模将从目前的1.57亿美元成长至9.13亿美元，预测期间内年复合成长率为19.3%。

市场规模与机会分析依下列参数细分：

监测方法

  • Online
  • Off-line
  • At-line

生物製程方法

  • 上游
  • 下游

工作量

  • 小于10毫升
  • 10-50毫升
  • 51-100毫升
  • 100毫升以上

可扩充

  • 实验室规模
  • 中试规模
  • 商业规模

主要地区

  • 北美
  • 欧洲
  • 亚太地区
  • 世界其他地区

全球自动无菌取样市场：成长与趋势

准确取样是製药生产中最重要的流程之一。传统的取样方法和手动取样技术存在污染风险，并可能导致样品製备和取样过程中操作员之间的偏差。此外，管理即时资料对于参与操作的工作人员来说是一项艰鉅的挑战。因此，对能够实现准确处理和无菌取样的取样系统的需求日益成长。在此背景下，自动无菌取样系统应运而生，成为实现精准取样、最大限度减少误差和即时资料监控的理想解决方案。

自动无菌取样市场-IMG1

值得注意的是，引进自动无菌取样系统有助于减少约65%的偏差，并将整体生产率提高高达80%。此外，由于自动取样系统的重要性，许多製药公司已开始采用这些系统，以实现无缝且无错误的取样作业。因此，由于自动无菌取样系统的广泛应用，预计在预测期内，其市场将实现成长。

全球自动无菌取样市场：关键洞察

本研究报告探讨了全球自动无菌取样市场的现状，并揭示了该行业的潜在成长机会。报告的主要调查结果包括：

  • 目前，全球市场上有超过 55 种自动取样系统，其中中型企业占比相对较大。
  • 大多数自动取样系统（83%）都支援线上即时监控和连续製程控制，製药和生物技术公司已成为这些系统最主要的终端用户。
自动无菌取样市场-IMG2
  • 超过 80%的自动样品采集/製备系统製造商成立于2000年之前，其中大多数位于北美。
  • 为了打造竞争优势，该行业的利益相关者努力丰富其产品组合，并透过先进的功能升级其自动取样系统。
  • 各利害关係人已申请/授予 400 多项与生物製药产业自动取样相关的专利，以保护该领域产生的智慧财产权。
  • 自2018年以来，该领域的专利申请数量以 40%的年复合成长率成长，其中近 30%是在过去 12个月内提交的。
  • 利害关係人日益成长的兴趣也体现在针对自动取样系统举办的活动中，这些活动为产品开发人员提供了交流想法和更佳了解此类系统的机会。
  • 超过 35%的合作伙伴关係是为了产品分销而签署的，其中北美利益相关者签署的与自动取样相关的协议数量最多。
  • 生物製药产业日益采用自动取样系统，预计将为系统製造商创造丰厚的利润。
  • 鑑于需要能够将生物製程样品直接从生物反应器转移到分析仪，同时保持製程无菌的系统，预计自动取样的采用率将大幅增加。
自动无菌取样市场-IMG3
  • 到2035年，该市场的年复合成长率可能超过19.3%。这一机会很可能分布在各个地区和其他关键细分市场。

全球自动无菌取样市场：关键细分市场

依监测方法，市场分为Online、Off-line、At-line。目前，Online上市场占全球自动无菌取样市场的大部分占有率（约60%）。此外，预计Online市场的成长速度将高于其他细分市场。

依工作量划分，市场分为小于10毫升、10-50毫升、51-100毫升和大于100毫升。目前，10-50毫升市场占全球自动无菌取样市场的比例最高（约40%）。值得注意的是，51-100毫升市场的自动无菌取样市场很可能以相对较高的年复合成长率成长。

依生物製程方法划分，市场分为上游和下游。目前，上游市场占自动无菌取样市场的最大占有率（约60%）。该市场也可能以相对较高的年复合成长率成长。

依扩展类型划分，市场分为实验室规模、中试规模及商业规模。目前，实验室规模市场占自动无菌取样市场的比例最高（约50%）。值得注意的是，中试规模的自动无菌取样市场可望维持相对较高的年复合成长率。

依主要地区划分，市场分为北美、欧洲、亚太地区及世界其他地区。目前，北美（约55%）在自动无菌取样市场占据主导地位，占据最大的收入占有率。然而，预计亚太地区的市场将以更高的年复合成长率成长。

自动无菌取样市场参与者

  • Agilent Technologies
  • Biotage
  • Cytiva
  • Flownamics
  • MGI Tech
  • Mettler Toledo
  • Pall Corporation
  • Shimadzu
  • SOTAX

本报告调查全球自动无菌取样市场，提供市场概述，以及依监测方法、生物加工方法、工作量、扩张趋势、区域的趋势，和参与市场的公司简介。

目录

第1章 简介

第2章 执行摘要

第3章 简介

  • 章节概述
  • 取样中的製程分析技术
  • 手动取样与自动取样
  • 自动取样系统的需求
  • 自动无菌取样系统
  • 取样系统的组件
  • 独立系统与整合系统
  • 如何监控与控制生物过程
  • 自动取样的关键考虑因素
  • 自动取样系统的优势
  • 标准和要求
  • 未来创新

第4章 市场模式：自动化取样系统

  • 章节概述
  • 自动取样系统：市场格局
  • 自动取样系统製造商列表

第5章 公司竞争力分析

  • 章节概述
  • 假设/关键参数
  • 研究范围与方法
  • 公司竞争力分析：北美自动取样系统製造商
  • 公司竞争力分析：欧洲自动取样系统製造商
  • 公司竞争力分析：亚太地区自动取样系统製造商

第6章 自动取样系统製造商公司简介

  • 章节概述
  • Agilent Technologies
  • Cytiva
  • Mettler Toledo
  • Pall Corporation
  • Shimadzu
  • Xylem

第7章 自动化样品采集与製备系统市场现况

  • 章节概述
  • 自动化样品采集与製备系统：市场现况
  • 自动化样品采集和製备系统製造商列表

第8章 公司简介 自动化样品采集与製备系统製造商

  • 章节概述
  • Agilent Technologies
  • Biotage
  • Flownamics
  • MGI Tech
  • SOTAX

第9章 专利分析

  • 章节概述
  • 范围与研究方法论
  • 生物製药中的自动取样和 CQA 测量：专利分析
  • 生物製药中的自动取样和 CQA 测量：专利基准分析
  • 生物製药中的自动取样和 CQA 测量：专利评估分析
  • 高引用专利

第10章 最新进展

  • 章节概述
  • 生物製药中的自动取样和 CQA 测量：合作活动
  • 生物製药中的自动取样和 CQA 测量：全球事件
  • 结论

第11章 SWOT 分析

第12章 波特五力分析

  • 章节概述
  • 研究方法与假设
  • 关键参数
  • 结论

第13章 市场预测与机会分析

  • 章节概述
  • 关键假设与研究方法
  • 2035年全球生物製药自动取样及CQA测量市场
    • 生物製药自动取样及CQA测量市场：依监测方法
    • 生物製药自动取样及CQA测量市场：依生物製程方法
    • 生物製药自动取样与CQA测量市场：依工作量
    • 生物製药自动取样和CQA测量市场：依扩展性
    • 生物製药自动取样和CQA测量市场：依主要地区

第14章 工业革命：从工业 1.0 到工业 5.0

  • 章节概述
  • 从工业 1.0 到工业 5.0 的转型
  • 实验室演进的前景
  • 工业 4.0 的优势
  • 工业 5.0 的优势
  • 结论

第15章 结论

第16章 高层洞察

第17章 附录1：表格资料

第18章 附录2：公司与组织清单

Product Code: RA100363

GLOBAL AUTOMATIC ASEPTIC SAMPLING MARKET: OVERVIEW

As per Roots Analysis, the global automatic aseptic sampling market is estimated to grow from USD 157 million in the current year to USD 913 million by 2035, at a CAGR of 19.3% during the forecast period, till 2035.

The market sizing and opportunity analysis has been segmented across the following parameters:

Type of Monitoring Method

  • Online
  • Off-line
  • At-line

Bioprocessing Method

  • Upstream
  • Downstream

Working Volume

  • Less than 10 ml
  • 10-50 ml
  • 51-100 ml
  • More than 100 ml

Scalability

  • Lab Scale
  • Pilot Scale
  • Commercial Scale

Key Geographical Regions

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Rest of the World

GLOBAL AUTOMATIC ASEPTIC SAMPLING MARKET: GROWTH AND TRENDS

Accurate sampling is one of the most crucial processes during the production of pharmaceutical products. The conventional sampling approach or manual sampling techniques pose a risk of contamination and may result in operator-to-operator deviations during sample preparation and sampling. Furthermore, managing real-time data can be challenging for the labor enrolled in operational processes. Consequently, there is an increasing demand for sampling systems that allow accurate handling and aseptic sampling. In this context, an automatic aseptic sampling system emerges as an ideal solution for accurate sampling, minimizing errors, and real-time data monitoring.

Automatic Aseptic Sampling Market - IMG1

Notably, the implementation of automated aseptic sampling systems helps to reduce deviation by around 65% and improve overall productivity by up to 80%. Further, owing to the significance offered by automated sampling systems, several pharmaceutical companies have begun to adopt these systems for seamless, error-free sampling operations. As a result, the automated aseptic sampling market is anticipated to grow during the forecast period driven by its wide-scale adoption.

GLOBAL AUTOMATIC ASEPTIC SAMPLING MARKET: KEY INSIGHTS

The report delves into the current state of global automatic aseptic sampling market and identifies potential growth opportunities within industry. Some key findings from the report include:

  • Presently, more than 55 automatic sampling systems are commercially available in different regions of the globe; a relatively larger proportion of these players are mid-sized companies.
  • Majority of the automatic sampling systems (83%) allow on-line real-time monitoring and continuous process control; pharma and biotech companies have emerged as the most prominent end users of these systems.
Automatic Aseptic Sampling Market - IMG2
  • More than 80% of the automatic sample collection / preparation system manufacturers were established before 2000; majority of them are based in North America.
  • In pursuit of building a competitive edge, stakeholders in this domain are striving to enhance their product portfolio and upgrade their automatic sampling systems with advanced features.
  • Over 400 patents related to automatic sampling in biopharmaceutical industry have been filed / granted by various stakeholders in order to protect the intellectual property generated within this field.
  • The number of patents filed in this domain has increased at a CAGR of 40% since 2018; close to 30% of the patents have been filed in the last 12 months.
  • The growing interest of stakeholders is also reflected by the events organized for automatic sampling systems, providing product developers with the opportunity to share their ideas and develop a better understanding of such systems.
  • Over 35% of the partnerships were signed for product distribution purposes; stakeholders based in North America have signed maximum agreements related to automatic sampling.
  • The increasing adoption of automatic sampling systems in the biopharmaceutical industry is anticipated to create profitable business opportunities for the system manufacturers.
  • Given the requirement of systems that can transfer bioprocess samples directly from bioreactors to analyzers while maintaining the process sterility, the adoption of automatic sampling is anticipated to rise significantly.
Automatic Aseptic Sampling Market - IMG3
  • The market is likely to grow at an annualized rate of more than 19.3% by 2035; the opportunity is likely to be well distributed across different geographies, and other important market segments.

GLOBAL AUTOMATIC ASEPTIC SAMPLING MARKET: KEY SEGMENTS

The Online Segment Occupies the Largest Share of the Automatic Aseptic Sampling Market

Based on type of monitoring method, the market is segmented into online, off-line and at-line. At present, the online segment holds the majority share (~60%) of the global automatic aseptic sampling market. Additionally, the at-line segment is likely to grow at a faster pace compared to the other segments.

By Working Volume, 51-100 ml is the Fastest Growing Segment of the Global Automatic Aseptic Sampling Market

Based on the working volume, the market is segmented into less than 10 ml, 10-50 ml, 51-100 ml, and more than 100 ml. Currently, the 10-50 ml segment captures the highest proportion (~40%) of the global automatic aseptic sampling market. It is worth highlighting that the automatic aseptic sampling market for 51-100 ml segment is likely to grow at a relatively higher CAGR.

Upstream Segment Occupy the Largest Share of the Automatic Aseptic Sampling Market

Based on the bioprocessing method, the market is segmented into upstream and downstream. At present, the upstream segment holds the maximum share (~60%) of the automatic aseptic sampling market. In addition, this segment is likely to grow at a relatively higher CAGR.

By Scalability, the Pilot Scale Segment is the Fastest Growing Segment of the Automatic Aseptic Sampling Market During the Forecast Period

Based on the scalability, the market is segmented into lab scale, pilot scale, and commercial scale. Currently, lab scale segment captures the highest proportion (~50%) of the automatic aseptic sampling market. Further, it is worth highlighting that the automatic aseptic sampling market for pilot scale is likely to grow at a relatively higher CAGR.

North America Accounts for the Largest Share of the Market

Based on key geographical regions, the market is segmented into North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of the World. Currently, North America (~55%) dominates the automatic aseptic sampling market and accounts for the largest revenue share. However, the market in Asia-Pacific is expected to grow at a higher CAGR.

Example Players in the Automatic Aseptic Sampling Market

  • Agilent Technologies
  • Biotage
  • Cytiva
  • Flownamics
  • MGI Tech
  • Mettler Toledo
  • Pall Corporation
  • Shimadzu
  • SOTAX

GLOBAL AUTOMATIC ASEPTIC SAMPLING MARKET: RESEARCH COVERAGE

  • Market Sizing and Opportunity Analysis: The report features an in-depth analysis of the global automated liquid handling systems market, focusing on key market segments, including [A] type of monitoring method, [B] bioprocessing method, [C] working volume, [D] scalability and [E] key geographical regions.
  • Automatic Sampling Systems Market Landscape: A comprehensive evaluation of automatic sampling systems, considering various parameters, such as [A] type of monitoring method, [B] type of sampling unit(s), [C] availability of pump / probe, [D] type of module, [E] automated software, [F] type of vessel, [G] vessel fabrication material, [H] type of analyte monitored, [I] type of analyzer, [J] number of sampling vessels, [K] working volume, [L] operating temperature, [M] end-user industry, [N] scalability and [O] applications of the system. Additionally, the module presents comprehensive analysis of automatic sampling system developers, based on [A] year of establishment, [B] company size, [C] location of headquarters and [D] leading players (in terms of number of systems being offered).
  • Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers Competitiveness Analysis: A comprehensive competitive analysis of automatic sampling systems manufacturers, examining factors, such as [A] overall experience of the company, [B] product portfolio strength and [C] portfolio diversity.
  • Automatic Sampling System Company Profiles: In-depth profiles of companies engaged in the automatic aseptic sampling market, focusing on [A] company overviews, [B] financial information (if available), [C] product portfolio and [D] recent developments and an informed future outlook.
  • Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation System Manufacturers Market Landscape: A comprehensive evaluation of automatic sample collection / preparation systems, considering various parameters, such as [A] system category, [B] system classification, [C] type of monitoring method, [D] type of sampling unit, [E] type of module, [F] working volume, [G] type of analyzer, [H] end-user industry and [I] scalability of the products. Additionally, a comprehensive analysis of players engaged in developing automatic sample collection / preparation systems, based on [A] year of establishment, [B] company size and [C] location of headquarters.
  • Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation System Company Profiles: In-depth profiles of companies offering automatic sample collection / preparation systems, focusing on [A] company overviews, [B] product portfolio and [C] recent developments and an informed future outlook.
  • Patent Analysis: An in-depth analysis of patents filed / granted till date in the automatic sampling systems domain, based on various relevant parameters, such as [A] type of patent, [B] publication year, [C] geographical location, [D] CPC symbols, [E] emerging focus areas, [F] type of organization, [G] leading players (in terms of number of patents granted / filed in the given time period), [H] patent characteristics, [I] patent benchmarking and [J] patent valuation.
  • Recent Developments: An in-depth analysis of various developments / recent trends related to automatic sampling systems, providing insights on recent global events related to automatic sampling systems and partnerships and collaborations established within the domain.
  • SWOT Analysis: An analysis of industry affiliated trends, opportunities and challenges, which are likely to impact the evolution of automatic sampling systems market; it includes a Harvey ball analysis, assessing the relative impact of each SWOT parameter on industry dynamics.
  • PORTER'S Five Forces Analysis: A detailed analysis of the five competitive forces prevalent in automatic sampling systems market, including [A] threats of new entrants, [B] bargaining power of customers, [C] bargaining power of automatic sampling system manufacturers, [C] threats of substitute products and [D] rivalry among existing competitors.

KEY QUESTIONS ANSWERED IN THIS REPORT

  • How many companies are currently engaged in this market?
  • Which are the leading companies in this market?
  • What factors are likely to influence the evolution of this market?
  • What is the current and future market size?
  • What is the CAGR of this market?
  • How is the current and future market opportunity likely to be distributed across key market segments?

REASONS TO BUY THIS REPORT

  • The report provides a comprehensive market analysis, offering detailed revenue projections of the overall market and its specific sub-segments. This information is valuable to both established market leaders and emerging entrants.
  • Stakeholders can leverage the report to gain a deeper understanding of the competitive dynamics within the market. By analyzing the competitive landscape, businesses can make informed decisions to optimize their market positioning and develop effective go-to-market strategies.
  • The report offers stakeholders a comprehensive overview of the market, including key drivers, barriers, opportunities, and challenges. This information empowers stakeholders to stay abreast of market trends and make data-driven decisions to capitalize on growth prospects.

ADDITIONAL BENEFITS

  • Complimentary PPT Insights Packs
  • Complimentary Excel Data Packs for all Analytical Modules in the Report
  • 15% Free Content Customization
  • Detailed Report Walkthrough Session with Research Team
  • Free Updated report if the report is 6-12 months old or older

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. PREFACE

  • 1.1. Scope of the Report
  • 1.2. Research Methodology
    • 1.2.1. Research Assumptions
    • 1.2.2. Project Methodology
    • 1.2.3. Forecast Methodology
    • 1.2.4. Robust Quality Control
    • 1.2.5. Key Considerations
      • 1.2.5.1. Demographics
      • 1.2.5.2. Economic Factors
      • 1.2.5.3. Government Regulations
      • 1.2.5.4. Supply Chain
      • 1.2.5.5. COVID Impact / Related Factors
      • 1.2.5.6. Market Access
      • 1.2.5.7. Healthcare Policies
      • 1.2.5.8. Industry Consolidation
  • 1.3 Key Questions Answered
  • 1.4. Chapter Outlines

2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

3. INTRODUCTION

  • 3.1. Chapter Overview
  • 3.2. Process Analytical Technology in Sampling
  • 3.3. Manual Sampling versus Automatic Sampling
  • 3.4. Need for Automatic Sampling Systems
  • 3.5. Automatic Aseptic Sampling System
  • 3.6. Components of a Sampling System
  • 3.7. Stand-alone Systems versus Integrated Systems
  • 3.8. Bioprocess Monitoring and Control Methods
    • 3.8.1. At-line Monitoring
    • 3.8.2. In-line Monitoring
    • 3.8.3. Off-line Monitoring
    • 3.8.4. On-line Monitoring
  • 3.9. Key Considerations for Automatic Sampling
    • 3.9.1. Sample Volume
    • 3.9.2. Cell Removal
    • 3.9.3. Sampling Rate
    • 3.9.4. Integration of Analyzers
    • 3.9.5. Feedback to Bioreactor
    • 3.9.6. Flexibility
    • 3.9.7. Transferability
    • 3.9.8. Price
  • 3.10. Benefits of Automatic Sampling Systems
  • 3.11. Standards and Requirements
  • 3.12. Future Innovations

4. MARKET LANDSCAPE: AUTOMATIC SAMPLING SYSTEMS

  • 4.1. Chapter Overview
  • 4.2. Automatic Sampling Systems: Overall Market Landscape
    • 4.2.1. Analysis by Type of Monitoring Method
    • 4.2.2. Analysis by Type of Sampling Unit
    • 4.2.3. Analysis by Availability of Pump / Probe
    • 4.2.4. Analysis by Type of Module
    • 4.2.5. Analysis by Automated Software
    • 4.2.6. Analysis by Type of Vessel
    • 4.2.7. Analysis by Vessel Fabrication Material
    • 4.2.8. Analysis by Type of Analyte Monitored
    • 4.2.9. Analysis by Type of Analyzer
    • 4.2.10. Analysis by Number of Sampling Vessels
    • 4.2.11. Analysis by Working Volume
    • 4.2.12. Analysis by Operating Temperature
    • 4.2.13. Analysis by End User Industry
    • 4.2.14. Analysis by Scalability
    • 4.2.15. Analysis by Application(s)
  • 4.3. List of Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers
    • 4.3.1. Analysis by Year of Establishment
    • 4.3.2. Analysis by Company Size
    • 4.3.3. Analysis by Region of Headquarters
    • 4.3.4. Analysis by Company Size and Region of Headquarters
    • 4.3.5. Analysis by Location of Headquarters
    • 4.3.6. Leading Players: Analysis by Number of Automatic Sampling Systems Manufactured
    • 4.3.7. Leading Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers: Analysis by Number of End User Industries

5. COMPANY COMPETITIVENESS ANALYSIS

  • 5.1. Chapter Overview
  • 5.2. Assumptions / Key Parameters
  • 5.3. Scope and Methodology
  • 5.4. Company Competitiveness Analysis: Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers in North America
  • 5.5. Company Competitiveness Analysis: Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers in Europe
  • 5.6. Company Competitiveness Analysis: Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers in Asia-Pacific

6. COMPANY PROFILES: AUTOMATIC SAMPLING SYSTEM MANUFACTURERS

  • 6.1. Chapter Overview
  • 6.2. Agilent Technologies
    • 6.2.1. Company Overview
    • 6.2.2. Financial Information
    • 6.2.3. Product Portfolio
    • 6.2.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
  • 6.3. Cytiva
    • 6.3.1. Company Overview
    • 6.3.2. Product Portfolio
    • 6.3.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
  • 6.4. Mettler Toledo
    • 6.4.1. Company Overview
    • 6.4.2. Financial Information
    • 6.4.3. Product Portfolio
    • 6.4.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
  • 6.5. Pall Corporation
    • 6.5.1. Company Overview
    • 6.5.2. Product Portfolio
    • 6.5.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
  • 6.6. Shimadzu
    • 6.6.1. Company Overview
    • 6.6.2. Financial Information
    • 6.6.3. Product Portfolio
    • 6.6.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
  • 6.7. Xylem
    • 6.7.1. Company Overview
    • 6.7.2. Financial Information
    • 6.7.3. Product Portfolio
    • 6.7.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook

7. MARKET LANDSCAPE: AUTOMATIC SAMPLE COLLECTION / PREPARATION SYSTEMS

  • 7.1. Chapter Overview
  • 7.2. Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems: Overall Market Landscape
    • 7.2.1. Analysis by System Category
    • 7.2.2. Analysis by System Classification
    • 7.2.3. Analysis by Type of Monitoring Method
    • 7.2.4. Analysis by Type of Sampling Unit
    • 7.2.5. Analysis by Type of Module
    • 7.2.6. Analysis by Working Volume
    • 7.2.7. Analysis by Type of Analyzer
    • 7.2.8. Analysis by End User Industry
    • 7.2.9. Analysis by Scalability
  • 7.3. List of Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation System Manufacturers
    • 7.3.1. Analysis by Year of Establishment
    • 7.3.2. Analysis by Company Size
    • 7.3.3. Analysis by Region of Headquarters
    • 7.3.4. Analysis by Company Size and Region of Headquarters
    • 7.3.5. Analysis by Location of Headquarters
    • 7.3.6. Leading Players: Analysis by Number of Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems Manufactured

8. COMPANY PROFILES: AUTOMATIC SAMPLE COLLECTION / PREPARATION SYSTEM MANUFACTURERS

  • 8.1. Chapter Overview
  • 8.2. Agilent Technologies
    • 8.2.1. Company Overview
    • 8.2.2. Product Portfolio
    • 8.2.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
  • 8.3. Biotage
    • 8.3.1. Company Overview
    • 8.3.2. Product Portfolio
    • 8.3.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
  • 8.4. Flownamics
    • 8.4.1. Company Overview
    • 8.4.2. Product Portfolio
    • 8.4.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
  • 8.5. MGI Tech
    • 8.5.1. Company Overview
    • 8.5.2. Product Portfolio
    • 8.5.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
  • 8.6. SOTAX
    • 8.6.1. Company Overview
    • 8.6.2. Product Portfolio
    • 8.6.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook

9. PATENT ANALYSIS

  • 9.1. Chapter Overview
  • 9.2. Scope and Methodology
  • 9.3. Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA: Patent Analysis
    • 9.3.1. Analysis by Publication Year
    • 9.3.2. Analysis by Annual Number of Granted Patents and Patent Applications
    • 9.3.3. Analysis by Geographical Location
    • 9.3.4. Analysis by CPC Symbols
    • 9.3.5. Word Cloud: Emerging Focus Areas
    • 9.3.6. Analysis by Type of Organization
    • 9.3.7. Leading Industry Players: Analysis by Number of Patents
    • 9.3.8. Leading Non-Industry Players: Analysis by Number of Patents
    • 9.3.9. Leading Individual Assignees: Analysis by Number of Patents
  • 9.4. Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA: Patent Benchmarking Analysis
    • 9.4.1. Analysis by Patent Characteristics
  • 9.5. Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA: Patent Valuation Analysis
  • 9.6. Leading Patents by Number of Citations

10. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

  • 10.1. Chapter Overview
  • 10.2. Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA: Partnership Activity
    • 10.2.1. Partnership Models
    • 10.2.2. List of Partnerships and Collaborations
      • 10.2.2.1. Analysis by Year of Partnership
      • 10.2.2.2. Analysis by Type of Partnership
      • 10.2.2.3. Analysis by Type of Product
      • 10.2.2.4. Analysis by Product and Type of Partnership
      • 10.2.2.5. Most Active Players: Analysis by Number of Partnerships
      • 10.2.2.6. Word Cloud: Emerging Focus Areas
      • 10.2.2.7. Regional Analysis
      • 10.2.2.8. Intercontinental and Intracontinental Agreements
  • 10.3. Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA: Global Events
    • 10.3.1. List of Global Events
      • 10.3.1.1. Analysis by Year of Event
      • 10.3.1.2. Analysis by Event Platform
      • 10.3.1.3. Analysis by Type of Event
      • 10.3.1.4. Analysis by Geography
      • 10.3.1.5. Word Cloud: Evolutionary Trends in Event Agenda / Key Focus Area
      • 10.3.1.6. Most Active Participants: Analysis by Number of Events
      • 10.3.1.7. Analysis by Seniority Level of Event Speakers
  • 10.4. Concluding Remarks

11. SWOT ANALYSIS

  • 11.1. Chapter Overview
  • 11.2. Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA: SWOT Analysis
    • 11.2.1. Comparison of SWOT Factors

12. PORTERS FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS

  • 12.1. Chapter Overview
  • 12.2. Methodology and Assumptions
  • 12.3. Key Parameters
    • 12.3.1. Threats of New Entrants
    • 12.3.2. Bargaining Power of Customers
    • 12.3.3. Bargaining Power of Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers
    • 12.3.4. Threats of Substitute Products
    • 12.3.5. Rivalry Among Existing Competitors
  • 12.4. Concluding Remarks

13. MARKET FORECAST AND OPPORTUNITY ANALYSIS

  • 13.1. Chapter Overview
  • 13.2. Key Assumptions and Methodology
  • 13.3. Global Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA Market, Till 2035
    • 13.3.1. Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA Market: Distribution by Type of Monitoring Method
      • 13.3.1.1. Automatic Sampling Market for On-line Monitoring, Till 2035
      • 13.3.1.2. Automatic Sampling Market for Off-line Monitoring, Till 2035
      • 13.3.1.3. Automatic Sampling Market for At-line Monitoring, Till 2035
    • 13.3.2. Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA Market: Distribution by Type of Bioprocessing Method
      • 13.3.2.1. Automatic Sampling Market for Upstream Bioprocessing, Till 2035
      • 13.3.2.2. Automatic Sampling Market for Downstream Bioprocessing, Till 2035
    • 13.3.3. Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA Market: Distribution by Working Volume
      • 13.3.3.1. Automatic Sampling Market for Systems with less than 10 mL Working Volume, Till 2035
      • 13.3.3.2. Automatic Sampling Market for Systems with 10-50 mL Working Volume, Till 2035
      • 13.3.3.3. Automatic Sampling Market for Systems with 51-100 mL Working Volume, Till 2035
      • 13.3.3.4. Automatic Sampling Market for Systems with more than 100 mL Working Volume, Till 2035
    • 13.3.4. Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA Market: Distribution by Scalability
      • 13.3.4.1. Automatic Sampling Market for Lab Scale Operations, Till 2035
      • 13.3.4.2. Automatic Sampling Market for Pilot Scale Operations, Till 2035
      • 13.3.4.3. Automatic Sampling Market for Commercial Scale Operations, Till 2035
    • 13.3.5. Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA Market: Distribution by Key Geographical Regions
      • 13.3.5.1. Automatic Sampling Market in North America, Till 2035
      • 13.3.5.2. Automatic Sampling Market in Europe, Till 2035
      • 13.3.5.3. Automatic Sampling Market in Asia-Pacific and Rest of the World, Till 2035

14. INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION FROM INDUSTRY 1.0 TO INDUSTRY 5.0

  • 14.1. Chapter Overview
  • 14.2. Transition from Industry 1.0 to Industry 5.0
    • 14.2.1. Industry 1.0
    • 14.2.2. Industry 2.0
    • 14.2.3. Industry 3.0
    • 14.2.4. Industry 4.0
    • 14.2.5. Industry 5.0
  • 14.3. Horizons of Lab Evolution
  • 14.4. Benefits of Industry 4.0
  • 14.5. Benefits of Industry 5.0
  • 14.6. Concluding Remarks

15. CONCLUDING REMARKS

16. EXECUTIVE INSIGHTS

17. APPENDIX 1: TABULATED DATA

18. APPENDIX 2: LIST OF COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

List of Tables

  • Table 4.1 Automatic Sampling Systems: Information on Type of Monitoring Method, Type of Sample Monitored, Type of Sampling Unit(s) and Bioprocessing Method
  • Table 4.2 Automatic Sampling Systems: Information on Key Features
  • Table 4.3 Automatic Sampling Systems: Information on Usability, Automated Software, Type of Vessel, Vessel Fabrication Material, Type of Analyte Monitored, Certification and Regulatory Compliance
  • Table 4.4 Automatic Sampling Systems: Information on Type of Analyzer
  • Table 4.5 Automatic Sampling Systems: Information on Product Specifications
  • Table 4.6 Automatic Sampling Systems: Information on End User Industry and Scalability
  • Table 4.7 Automatic Sampling Systems: Information on Sterilizability and Application(s)
  • Table 4.8 List of Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers: Information on Year of Establishment, Employee Count, Company Size, Location and Region of Headquarters
  • Table 6.1 Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers: List of Companies Profiled
  • Table 6.2 Agilent Technologies: Company Snapshot
  • Table 6.3 Agilent Technologies: 850-DS Sampling Station
  • Table 6.4 Agilent Technologies: Recent Developments and Future Outlook
  • Table 6.5 Cytiva: Company Snapshot
  • Table 6.6 Cytiva: ALIAS(TM)
  • Table 6.7 Cytiva: Recent Developments and Future Outlook
  • Table 6.8 Mettler Toledo: Company Snapshot
  • Table 6.9 Mettler Toledo: EasySampler 1210 System
  • Table 6.10 Mettler Toledo: Recent Developments and Future Outlook
  • Table 6.11 Pall Corporation: Company Snapshot
  • Table 6.12 Pall Corporation: Allegro(TM) MVP Single-Use System
  • Table 6.13 Pall Corporation: Recent Developments and Future Outlook
  • Table 6.14 Shimadzu: Company Snapshot
  • Table 6.15 Shimadzu: Perfinity Workstation
  • Table 6.16 Shimadzu: Recent Developments and Future Outlook
  • Table 6.17 Xylem: Company Snapshot
  • Table 6.18 Xylem: YSI 2940/2980
  • Table 6.19 Xylem: Recent Developments and Future Outlook
  • Table 7.1 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems: Information on System Category, System Classification and Type of Monitoring Method
  • Table 7.2 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems: Information on Key Features
  • Table 7.3 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems: Information on Product Specifications, Type of Analyzer, Certification and Regulatory Compliance
  • Table 7.4 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems: Information on End User Industry and Scalability
  • Table 7.5 List of Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation System Manufacturers: Information on Year of Establishment, Employee Count, Company Size, Location and Region of Headquarters
  • Table 8.1 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation System Manufacturers: List of Companies Profiled
  • Table 8.2 Agilent Technologies: Company Snapshot
  • Table 8.3 Agilent Technologies: AssayMAP Bravo Protein Sample Prep Platform
  • Table 8.4 Agilent Technologies: 7696A Sample Prep Workbench
  • Table 8.5 Biotage: Company Snapshot
  • Table 8.6 Biotage: Extrahera(TM)
  • Table 8.7 Biotage: Extrahera LV-200
  • Table 8.8 Biotage: Recent Developments and Future Outlook
  • Table 8.9 Flownamics: Company Snapshot
  • Table 8.10 Flownamics: Sample-Mod(TM)
  • Table 8.11 Flownamics: Seg-Flow(R) Autosampler
  • Table 8.12 Flownamics: FlowFraction(TM)
  • Table 8.13 Flownamics: Recent Developments and Future Outlook
  • Table 8.14 MGI Tech: Company Snapshot
  • Table 8.15 MGI Tech: MGISP-960
  • Table 8.16 MGI Tech: MGISP-Smart 8
  • Table 8.17 MGI Tech: MGISP-100
  • Table 8.18 MGI Tech: Recent Developments and Future Outlook
  • Table 8.19 SOTAX: Company Snapshot
  • Table 8.20 SOTAX: TPW(TM) Automated Sample Preparation Workstation
  • Table 8.21 SOTAX: APW(TM) Automated Sample Preparation Workstation
  • Table 8.22 SOTAX: CTS Automated Sample Preparation Workstation
  • Table 9.1 Patent Analysis: Top 10 CPC Symbol Definitions
  • Table 9.2 Patent Analysis: Top Five CPC Symbols
  • Table 9.3 Patent Analysis: Top Seven CPC Classification Symbol Definitions
  • Table 9.4 Patent Analysis: Summary of Benchmarking Analysis
  • Table 9.5 Patent Analysis: Categorization based on Weighted Valuation Scores
  • Table 9.6 Patent Portfolio: List of Leading Patents (by Highest Relative Valuation)
  • Table 9.7 Patent Portfolio: List of Leading Patents (by Number of Citations)
  • Table 10.1 List of Partnerships and Collaborations
  • Table 10.2 List of Partnerships and Collaborations: Information on Focus Area and Type of Product
  • Table 10.3 List of Global Events related to Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA
  • Table 17.1 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Type of Monitoring Method
  • Table 17.2 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Type of Sampling Unit
  • Table 17.3 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Availability of Pump / Probe
  • Table 17.4 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Type of Module
  • Table 17.5 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Automated Software
  • Table 17.6 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Type of Vessel
  • Table 17.7 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Vessel Fabrication Material
  • Table 17.8 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Type of Analyte Monitored
  • Table 17.9 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Type of Analyzer
  • Table 17.10 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Number of Sampling Vessels
  • Table 17.11 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Working Volume (mL)
  • Table 17.12 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Operating Temperature (oC)
  • Table 17.13 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by End User Industry
  • Table 17.14 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Scalability
  • Table 17.15 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Application(s)
  • Table 17.16 Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers: Distribution by Year of Establishment
  • Table 17.17 Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers: Distribution by Company Size
  • Table 17.18 Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers: Distribution by Region of Headquarters
  • Table 17.19 Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers: Distribution by Company Size and Region of Headquarters
  • Table 17.20 Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers: Distribution by Location of Headquarters
  • Table 17.21 Leading Players: Distribution by Number of Automatic Sampling Systems Manufactured
  • Table 17.22 Leading Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers: Distribution by Number of End User Industries
  • Table 17.23 Agilent Technologies: Annual Revenues (USD Billion)
  • Table 17.24 Mettler Toledo: Annual Revenues (USD Billion)
  • Table 17.25 Shimadzu: Annual Revenues (JPY Billion)
  • Table 17.26 Xylem: Annual Revenues (USD Billion)
  • Table 17.27 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems: Distribution by System Category
  • Table 17.28 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems: Distribution by System Classification
  • Table 17.29 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems: Distribution by Type of Monitoring Method
  • Table 17.30 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems: Distribution by Type of Sampling Unit
  • Table 17.31 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems: Distribution by Type of Module
  • Table 17.32 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems: Distribution by Working Volume (mL)
  • Table 17.33 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems: Distribution by Type of Analyzer
  • Table 17.34 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems: Distribution by End User Industry
  • Table 17.35 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems: Distribution by Scalability
  • Table 17.36 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation System Manufacturers: Distribution by Year of Establishment
  • Table 17.37 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation System Manufacturers: Distribution by Company Size
  • Table 17.38 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation System Manufacturers: Distribution by Region of Headquarters
  • Table 17.39 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation System Manufacturers: Distribution by Company Size and Region of Headquarters
  • Table 17.40 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation System Manufacturers: Distribution by Location of Headquarters
  • Table 17.41 Leading Players: Distribution by Number of Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems Manufactured
  • Table 17.42 Patent Analysis: Distribution by Type of Patent
  • Table 17.43 Patent Analysis: Cumulative Distribution by Publication Year
  • Table 17.44 Patent Analysis: Distribution by Annual Number of Granted Patents and Patent Applications
  • Table 17.45 Patent Analysis: Distribution by Geographical Location
  • Table 17.46 Patent Analysis: Cumulative Year-wise Distribution by Type of Organization
  • Table 17.47 Leading Industry Players: Distribution by Number of Patents
  • Table 17.48 Leading Non-Industry Players: Distribution by Number of Patents
  • Table 17.49 Leading Individual Assignees: Distribution by Number of Patents
  • Table 17.50 Patent Analysis: Year-wise Distribution of Patents by Age
  • Table 17.51 Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA: Patent Valuation Analysis
  • Table 17.52 Partnerships and Collaborations: Cumulative Year-wise Trend
  • Table 17.53 Partnerships and Collaborations: Distribution by Type of Partnership
  • Table 17.54 Partnerships and Collaborations: Distribution by Year and Type of Partnership
  • Table 17.55 Partnerships and Collaborations: Distribution by Type of Product
  • Table 17.56 Most Active Players: Distribution by Number of Partnerships
  • Table 17.57 Partnerships and Collaborations: Regional Distribution
  • Table 17.58 Partnerships and Collaborations: Intercontinental and Intracontinental Agreements
  • Table 17.59 Global Events: Cumulative Year-wise Trend
  • Table 17.60 Global Events: Distribution by Event Platform
  • Table 17.61 Global Events: Distribution by Type of Event
  • Table 17.62 Global Events: Regional Distribution of Events
  • Table 17.63 Most Active Industry Participants: Distribution by Number of Events
  • Table 17.64 Global Events: Distribution by Seniority Level of Event Speakers
  • Table 17.65 Global Events: Distribution by Affiliated Department of Event Speakers
  • Table 17.66 Global Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA Market, Till 2035: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
  • Table 17.67 Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA Market: Distribution by Type of Monitoring Method
  • Table 17.68 Automatic Sampling Market for On-line Monitoring, Till 2035: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
  • Table 17.69 Automatic Sampling Market for Off-line Monitoring, Till 2035: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
  • Table 17.70 Automatic Sampling Market for At-line Monitoring, Till 2035: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
  • Table 17.71 Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA Market: Distribution by Type of Bioprocessing Method
  • Table 17.72 Automatic Sampling Market for Upstream Bioprocessing, Till 2035: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
  • Table 17.73 Automatic Sampling Market for Downstream Bioprocessing, Till 2035: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
  • Table 17.74 Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA Market: Distribution by Working Volume
  • Table 17.75 Automatic Sampling Market for Systems with less than 10 mL Working Volume, Till 2035: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
  • Table 17.76 Automatic Sampling Market for Systems with 10-50 mL Working Volume, Till 2035: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
  • Table 17.77 Automatic Sampling Market for Systems with 51-100 mL Working Volume, Till 2035: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
  • Table 17.78 Automatic Sampling Market for Systems with more than 100 mL Working Volume, Till 2035: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
  • Table 17.79 Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA Market: Distribution by Scalability
  • Table 17.80 Automatic Sampling Market for Lab Scale Operations, Till 2035: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
  • Table 17.81 Automatic Sampling Market for Pilot Scale Operations, Till 2035: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
  • Table 17.82 Automatic Sampling Market for Commercial Scale Operations, Till 2035: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
  • Table 17.83 Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA Market: Distribution by Key Geographical Regions
  • Table 17.84 Automatic Sampling Market in North America, Till 2035: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
  • Table 17.85 Automatic Sampling Market in Europe, Till 2035: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)
  • Table 17.86 Automatic Sampling Market in Asia-Pacific and Rest of the World, Till 2035: Conservative, Base and Optimistic Scenarios (USD Million)

List of Figures

  • Figure 2.1 Executive Summary: Automatic Sampling Systems Market Landscape
  • Figure 2.2 Executive Summary: Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems Market Landscape
  • Figure 2.3 Executive Summary: Patent Analysis
  • Figure 2.4 Executive Summary: Recent Developments
  • Figure 2.5 Executive Summary: Market Forecast and Opportunity Analysis
  • Figure 3.1 Manual Sampling versus Automatic Sampling
  • Figure 3.2 Automatic Aseptic Sampling System
  • Figure 3.3 Bioprocess Monitoring and Control Methods
  • Figure 3.4 Key Considerations for Automatic Sampling
  • Figure 3.5 Benefits of Automatic Sampling Systems
  • Figure 4.1 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Type of Monitoring Method
  • Figure 4.2 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Type of Sampling Unit
  • Figure 4.3 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Availability of Pump / Probe
  • Figure 4.4 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Type of Module
  • Figure 4.5 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Automated Software
  • Figure 4.6 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Type of Vessel
  • Figure 4.7 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Vessel Fabrication Material
  • Figure 4.8 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Type of Analyte Monitored
  • Figure 4.9 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Type of Analyzer
  • Figure 4.10 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Number of Sampling Vessels
  • Figure 4.11 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Working Volume (mL)
  • Figure 4.12 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Operating Temperature (oC)
  • Figure 4.13 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by End User Industry
  • Figure 4.14 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Scalability
  • Figure 4.15 Automatic Sampling Systems: Distribution by Application(s)
  • Figure 4.16 Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers: Distribution by Year of Establishment
  • Figure 4.17 Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers: Distribution by Company Size
  • Figure 4.18 Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers: Distribution by Region of Headquarters
  • Figure 4.19 Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers: Distribution by Company Size and Region of Headquarters
  • Figure 4.20 Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers: Distribution by Location of Headquarters
  • Figure 4.21 Leading Players: Distribution by Number of Automatic Sampling Systems Manufactured
  • Figure 4.22 Leading Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers: Distribution by Number of End User Industries
  • Figure 5.1 Company Competitiveness Analysis: Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers in North America
  • Figure 5.2 Company Competitiveness Analysis: Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers in Europe
  • Figure 5.3 Company Competitiveness Analysis: Automatic Sampling System Manufacturers in Asia-Pacific
  • Figure 6.1 Agilent Technologies: Annual Revenues (USD Billion)
  • Figure 6.2 Mettler Toledo: Annual Revenues (USD Billion)
  • Figure 6.3 Shimadzu: Annual Revenues (JPY Billion)
  • Figure 6.4 Xylem: Annual Revenues (USD Billion)
  • Figure 7.1 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems: Distribution by System Category
  • Figure 7.2 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems: Distribution by System Classification
  • Figure 7.3 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems: Distribution by Type of Monitoring Method
  • Figure 7.4 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems: Distribution by Type of Sampling Unit
  • Figure 7.5 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems: Distribution by Type of Module
  • Figure 7.6 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems: Distribution by Working Volume (mL)
  • Figure 7.7 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems: Distribution by Type of Analyzer
  • Figure 7.8 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems: Distribution by End User Industry
  • Figure 7.9 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems: Distribution by Scalability
  • Figure 7.10 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation System Manufacturers: Distribution by Year of Establishment
  • Figure 7.11 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation System Manufacturers: Distribution by Company Size
  • Figure 7.12 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation System Manufacturers: Distribution by Region of Headquarters
  • Figure 7.13 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation System Manufacturers: Distribution by Company Size and Region of Headquarters
  • Figure 7.14 Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation System Manufacturers: Distribution by Location of Headquarters
  • Figure 7.15 Leading Players: Distribution by Number of Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems Manufactured
  • Figure 9.1 Patent Analysis: Distribution by Type of Patent
  • Figure 9.2 Patent Analysis: Cumulative Distribution by Publication Year
  • Figure 9.3 Patent Analysis: Distribution by Annual Number of Granted Patents and Patent Applications
  • Figure 9.4 Patent Analysis: Distribution by Geographical Location
  • Figure 9.5 Patent Analysis: Distribution by CPC Symbols
  • Figure 9.6 Word Cloud: Emerging Focus Areas
  • Figure 9.7 Patent Analysis: Cumulative Year-wise Distribution by Type of Organization
  • Figure 9.8 Leading Industry Players: Distribution by Number of Patents
  • Figure 9.9 Leading Non-Industry Players: Distribution by Number of Patents
  • Figure 9.10 Leading Individual Assignees: Distribution by Number of Patents
  • Figure 9.11 Leading Players: Benchmarking by Patent Characteristics (CPC Symbols)
  • Figure 9.12 Patent Analysis: Year-wise Distribution of Patents by Age
  • Figure 9.13 Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA: Patent Valuation Analysis
  • Figure 10.1 Partnerships and Collaborations: Cumulative Year-wise Trend
  • Figure 10.2 Partnerships and Collaborations: Distribution by Type of Partnership
  • Figure 10.3 Partnerships and Collaborations: Distribution by Year and Type of Partnership
  • Figure 10.4 Partnerships and Collaborations: Distribution by Type of Product
  • Figure 10.5 Partnerships and Collaborations: Distribution by Product and Type of Partnership
  • Figure 10.6 Most Active Players: Distribution by Number of Partnerships
  • Figure 10.7 Word Cloud: Emerging Focus Areas
  • Figure 10.8 Partnerships and Collaborations: Regional Distribution
  • Figure 10.9 Partnerships and Collaborations: Intercontinental and Intracontinental Agreements
  • Figure 10.10 Global Events: Cumulative Year-wise Trend
  • Figure 10.11 Global Events: Distribution by Event Platform
  • Figure 10.12 Global Events: Distribution by Type of Event
  • Figure 10.13 Global Events: Regional Distribution of Events
  • Figure 10.14 Word Cloud: Evolutionary Trends in Event Agenda / Key Focus Area
  • Figure 10.15 Global Events: Historical Trend of Event Agendas
  • Figure 10.16 Most Active Industry Participants: Distribution by Number of Events
  • Figure 10.17 Global Events: Distribution by Seniority Level of Event Speakers
  • Figure 10.18 Global Events: Distribution by Affiliated Department of Event Speakers
  • Figure 11.1 Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 11.2 SWOT Factors: Harvey Ball Analysis
  • Figure 12.1 Porters Five Forces: Key Parameters
  • Figure 12.2 Porters Five Forces: Harvey Ball Analysis
  • Figure 13.1 Global Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA Market, Till 2035 (USD Million)
  • Figure 13.2 Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA Market: Distribution by Type of Monitoring Method
  • Figure 13.3 Automatic Sampling Market for On-line Monitoring, Till 2035 (USD Million)
  • Figure 13.4 Automatic Sampling Market for Off-line Monitoring, Till 2035 (USD Million)
  • Figure 13.5 Automatic Sampling Market for At-line Monitoring, Till 2035 (USD Million)
  • Figure 13.6 Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA Market: Distribution by Type of Bioprocessing Method
  • Figure 13.7 Automatic Sampling Market for Upstream Bioprocessing, Till 2035 (USD Million)
  • Figure 13.8 Automatic Sampling Market for Downstream Bioprocessing, Till 2035 (USD Million)
  • Figure 13.9 Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA Market: Distribution by Working Volume
  • Figure 13.10 Automatic Sampling Market for Systems with less than 10 mL Working Volume, Till 2035 (USD Million)
  • Figure 13.11 Automatic Sampling Market for Systems with 10-50 mL Working Volume, Till 2035 (USD Million)
  • Figure 13.12 Automatic Sampling Market for Systems with 51-100 mL Working Volume, Till 2035 (USD Million)
  • Figure 13.13 Automatic Sampling Market for Systems with more than 100 mL Working Volume, Till 2035 (USD Million)
  • Figure 13.14 Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA Market: Distribution by Scalability
  • Figure 13.15 Automatic Sampling Market for Lab Scale Operations, Till 2035 (USD Million)
  • Figure 13.16 Automatic Sampling Market for Pilot Scale Operations, Till 2035 (USD Million)
  • Figure 13.17 Automatic Sampling Market for Commercial Scale Operations, Till 2035 (USD Million)
  • Figure 13.18 Automatic Sampling in Biopharmaceutical Applications and the Measurement of CQA Market: Distribution by Key Geographical Regions
  • Figure 13.19 Automatic Sampling Market in North America, Till 2035 (USD Million)
  • Figure 13.20 Automatic Sampling Market in Europe, Till 2035 (USD Million)
  • Figure 13.21 Automatic Sampling Market in Asia-Pacific and Rest of the World, Till 2035 (USD Million)
  • Figure 14.1 Transition from Industry 1.0 to Industry 5.0
  • Figure 14.2 Horizons of Lab Evolution
  • Figure 14.3 Benefits of Industry 4.0
  • Figure 14.4 Benefits of Industry 5.0
  • Figure 15.1 Concluding Remarks: Automatic Sampling Systems Market Landscape
  • Figure 15.2 Concluding Remarks: Automatic Sample Collection / Preparation Systems Market Landscape
  • Figure 15.3 Concluding Remarks: Patent Analysis
  • Figure 15.4 Concluding Remarks: Partnerships and Collaborations
  • Figure 15.5 Concluding Remarks: Global Events
  • Figure 15.6 Concluding Remarks:Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • Figure 15.7 Concluding Remarks: Market Forecast and Opportunity Analysi