![]() |
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1876689
生物多样性信贷市场预测至2032年:按信贷类型、计划类型、买方类型、销售管道、最终用户和地区分類的全球分析Biodiversity Credit Market Forecasts to 2032 - Global Analysis By Credit Type, Project Type, Buyer Type, Sales Channel, End User, and By Geography |
||||||
根据 Stratistics MRC 的一项研究,全球生物多样性信用市场在 2025 年的估值为 7.4 亿美元,预计到 2032 年将达到 124.1 亿美元。
预计在预测期内,生物多样性信用将以49.4%的复合年增长率成长。生物多样性信用机制使私人投资能够透过创建与检验的生物多样性改善、栖息地恢復、物种恢復或入侵物种控制挂钩的可交易信用来支持保育成果。企业购买信用额度是为了减轻其营运对生物多样性的影响,并履行其对自然环境做出积极贡献的承诺。健全的监测机制、标准化的指标和长期的管治对于确保信用的公信力和持久性至关重要。
日益增长的监管要求和国际协议
生物多样性信用市场的主要驱动力是监管要求和国际协议的激增,例如《昆明-蒙特利尔生物多样性框架》。这些框架为各国和企业设定了明确且可操作的目标,并以法律形式强制要求对环境影响进行会计和抵销。这催生了合规主导的生物多样性信用需求,并将自愿保护措施转变为监管要求。因此,这些政策透过建立对经认证的生物多样性效益不可取代的需求基础,直接推动了市场成长。
市场基础设施、透明度和流动性有限
生物多样性信用市场的主要驱动力是监管要求和国际协议的激增,例如《昆明-蒙特利尔生物多样性框架》。这些框架为各国和企业设定了明确且可操作的目标,并以法律形式强制要求对环境影响进行会计和抵销。这催生了合规主导的生物多样性信用需求,将自愿保护措施转变为监管要求。因此,这些政策透过建立对经认证的生物多样性收益不可取代的需求基础,直接推动了市场成长。
与碳市场和生态系统服务付费(PES)的整合
将生物多样性信用与现有环境市场(特别是碳排放交易和生态系统服务付费机制)结合,蕴藏着巨大的机会。这种方法允许将信用额度捆绑在一起,使购买者能够同时实现气候和生物多样性目标,从而提升计划价值并吸引更广泛的投资者群体。此外,这种整合有助于采取更全面的自然资本管理方法,产生协同效应,并创建新的混合融资模式,从而显着加速市场扩张。
感测器技术的进步
分析指出,遥感探测技术和人工智慧驱动的监测技术的快速发展带来了矛盾的威胁。这些技术虽然有利于检验,但也使得企业能够以更低的成本和更高的可靠性进行内部生物多样性影响直接监测。这些进步可能会降低企业对购买第三方信用额度进行合规报告的依赖。因此,如果企业选择透过技术赋能的直接管理而非市场参与来履行其义务,那么对正式生物多样性信用额度的需求可能会受到削弱。
新冠疫情初期扰乱了生物多样性信用市场,导致计划延期、实地研究取消,政府和企业资金转移到紧急刺激计划。然而,这场危机也成为了一个深刻的催化剂,凸显了生态系统劣化与全球健康风险之间的关键连结。这种意识的增强促使政策制定者和企业在后疫情时代更加重视投资环境友善计划,从而催生了对生物多样性信用的更强劲、更持久的需求,将其作为改善和復苏工作的一部分。
预计在预测期内,栖息地恢復积分细分市场将占据最大的市场份额。
由于栖息地恢復信用额度与土地劣化零成长等紧迫的全球优先事项直接相关,且其成果切实可衡量,预计在预测期内,栖息地恢復信用额度将占据最大的市场份额。这些计划,包括植树造林和湿地恢復,通常拥有成熟的信用额度量化调查方法,从而降低了投资者的不确定性。此外,这些项目往往还能带来土壤保护和水质净化等额外效益,提升其价值,使其成为寻求检验影响的公共资金和企业永续发展投资的首选。
预计在预测期内,珊瑚礁和海洋生物多样性计划板块的复合年增长率将最高。
珊瑚礁和海洋生物多样性计划领域预计将在预测期内呈现最高的成长率,这反映出人们对海洋环境日益增长的关注以及沿海生态系统巨大的经济价值。针对濒危海洋栖息地的蓝色债券和以海洋为重点的ESG投资政策正在推动这一成长。此外,海洋监测技术的进步提高了这些计划的可信度,并使以往难以进入的环境中得以进行新的投资,从而使这一细分领域能够从目前的小规模规模迅速扩张。
预计在整个预测期内,欧洲将占据最大的市场份额。欧盟雄心勃勃的监管环境,包括自然修復法和严格的企业实质审查要求,巩固了其主导地位。这些政策催生了其他地区无法比拟的合规主导需求。此外,企业高度的环保意识和先行倡议,尤其是在法国和英国等国家,为市场发展和交易量提供了成熟的生态系统,进一步强化了欧洲的优势。
预计亚太地区将在预测期内实现最快成长,这主要得益于该地区丰富的生物多样性正面临严重威胁,以及各国纷纷推出旨在保护自然的政策。此外,该地区是国际生物多样性融资的主要受益地区,企业自愿投资需求也不断增长。高需求、不断变化的监管环境以及不断增加的投资,共同为生物多样性信贷计划的快速发展创造了有利条件。
According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Biodiversity Credit Market is accounted for $0.74 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $12.41 billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 49.4% during the forecast period. The biodiversity credit enables private investment to support conservation outcomes by creating tradable credits tied to verifiable biodiversity gains, habitat restoration, species recovery, or invasive species control. Corporates purchase credits to mitigate biodiversity impacts from operations, aligning with nature-positive commitments. Robust monitoring, standardized metrics, and long-term governance are essential for credibility and permanence.
Increasing regulatory mandates and international agreements
The primary driver for the biodiversity credit market is the surge in regulatory mandates and international agreements, such as the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. These frameworks establish clear, actionable targets for nations and corporations, legally compelling them to account for and offset their environmental impacts. This creates a compliance-driven demand for biodiversity credits, transforming voluntary conservation actions into a regulated necessity. Consequently, these policies are directly catalyzing market growth by establishing a non-negotiable demand base for certified biodiversity gains.
Limited market infrastructure, transparency, and liquidity
The primary driver for the biodiversity credit market is the surge in regulatory mandates and international agreements, such as the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. These frameworks establish clear, actionable targets for nations and corporations, legally compelling them to account for and offset their environmental impacts. This creates a compliance-driven demand for biodiversity credits, transforming voluntary conservation actions into a regulated necessity. Consequently, these policies are directly catalyzing market growth by establishing a non-negotiable demand base for certified biodiversity gains.
Integration with carbon markets and payment for ecosystem services
A substantial opportunity lies in the integration of biodiversity credits with established environmental markets, particularly carbon trading and Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes. This approach allows for the bundling of credits, enabling buyers to address climate and biodiversity goals simultaneously, thereby enhancing project value and attracting a broader investor base. Moreover, this integration fosters a more holistic approach to natural capital management, creating synergistic benefits and unlocking new, blended finance models that can significantly accelerate market expansion.
Advancements in sensor technology
The analysis identifies a paradoxical threat from rapid advancements in remote sensor technology and AI-driven monitoring. While beneficial for verification, these technologies are making it cheaper and more reliable for corporations to implement direct, in-house biodiversity impact monitoring. These improvements could reduce their dependence on purchasing third-party credits for compliance reporting. As a result, the demand for formal biodiversity credit units may be undermined if companies choose to manage obligations through direct, technologically enabled stewardship rather than market participation.
The COVID-19 pandemic initially disrupted the biodiversity credit market by causing project delays, halting field research, and diverting government and corporate funding towards immediate economic relief. However, the crisis also served as a profound catalyst by highlighting the critical link between ecosystem degradation and global health risks. This increased awareness has led to more attention from policymakers and businesses towards investing in nature-friendly projects after the pandemic, which has created a stronger and more lasting need for biodiversity credits as part of efforts to improve and rebuild.
The habitat restoration credits segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period
The habitat restoration credits segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period, driven by its direct alignment with pressing global priorities like land degradation neutrality and its tangible, measurable outcomes. These projects, encompassing reforestation and wetland rehabilitation, often have well-established methodologies for credit quantification, which reduces investor uncertainty. Furthermore, they frequently generate co-benefits such as soil conservation and water purification, enhancing their value and making them a preferred choice for both public funding and corporate sustainability investments seeking verifiable impact.
The coral reef & marine biodiversity projects segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period
Over the forecast period, the coral reef & marine biodiversity projects segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate, reflecting a surge in concern for ocean health and the immense economic value of coastal ecosystems. Blue bonds and ocean-focused ESG mandates, which target critically endangered marine habitats, fuel this growth. Additionally, technological advancements in marine monitoring are improving the credibility of these projects, unlocking new investment into a previously challenging environment, and positioning this niche for rapid expansion from its current smaller base.
During the forecast period, the Europe region is expected to hold the largest market share. The EU's ambitious regulatory landscape, which includes the Nature Restoration Law and stringent corporate due diligence requirements, firmly anchors this leadership. These policies are creating a compliance-driven demand unparalleled in other regions. Moreover, high levels of corporate environmental awareness and early mover initiatives, particularly in countries like France and the UK, provide a mature ecosystem for market development and transaction volume, solidifying Europe's dominant position.
During the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is expected to grow the fastest, driven by its rich biodiversity that is at great risk, along with a surge in national policies aimed at protecting nature. Furthermore, the region is a major recipient of international biodiversity finance and is seeing growing voluntary corporate demand. This combination of high need, evolving regulation, and increasing investment creates a potent environment for the rapid scaling of biodiversity credit projects.
Key players in the market
Some of the key players in Biodiversity Credit Market include Verra, Gold Standard, Plan Vivo Foundation, GreenCollar, Wildlife Works, Natural Capital Partners, BioCarbon Standard, Regen Network, Cercarbono, Ecosphere+, Forest Trends, Ecosystem Marketplace, Biodiversity Credit Alliance, Conservation International, Wildlife Conservation Society, and The Biodiversity Consultancy.
In July 2025, Plan Vivo opened its PV Nature Biodiversity Standard to multiple third-party data analytic providers so projects can choose approved partners for biodiversity quantification. It strengthens the PV Nature biodiversity credit pipeline by standardising measurement of biodiversity outcomes while scaling access for projects seeking Plan Vivo biodiversity credits.
In June 2025, the BioCarbon Standard released version 2.0 of its Sustainable Development Safeguards tool, tightening requirements around community rights, land use and biodiversity safeguards for registered mitigation projects. It reinforces that BioCarbon-certified activities must demonstrate robust biodiversity and social protections, supporting the integrity of any nature- or biodiversity-linked credits issued under the standard.
In February 2025, Gold Standard released its "Funding Nature: An evident business investment" update, announcing work on a corporate nature framework that will sit alongside its emerging biodiversity impact framework and market assessment for biodiversity impact units. It is designed to guide companies in using high-integrity biodiversity credit and nature-impact mechanisms as part of their net-zero and nature-positive strategies.
Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.