零信任架构市场预测至 2032 年：按组件、安全功能、身份验证类型、部署模式、组织规模、最终用户和地区分類的全球分析

根据 Stratistics MRC 的一项研究，预计到 2025 年，全球零信任架构市场价值将达到 405.3 亿美元，到 2032 年将达到 1,253.4 亿美元，在预测期内的复合年增长率为 17.5%。

零信任架构是一种网路安全模型，其核心理念是预设不应信任任何使用者或设备，而是要求在授予任何系统或资料存取权限之前进行持续检验。它强制执行强大的身份验证、微隔离和严格的最小权限原则，而不是假定内部网路的安全性。这种方法显着降低了遭受网路攻击的风险，并限制了未经授权的横向移动，因为每个请求都会被监控、检验和评估潜在风险。零信任架构旨在保护云端平台、远端操作和混合 IT 环境，帮助组织加强资料保护，降低资料外洩的可能性，并维护一个更安全、更具弹性和更易于管理的数位生态系统。

根据美国国家标准与技术美国(NIST) SP 800-207 的规定，零信任将防御的重点从静态的网路边界转移到使用者、资产和资源，要求在授予存取权限之前进行持续的身份验证和授权。

日益复杂的网路攻击

零信任架构市场的成长主要受全球企业面临的日益复杂且数量庞大的网路威胁的驱动。传统的边界防御已无法抵御诸如凭证窃取、相关人员滥用和持续入侵等现代攻击。随着攻击者利用云端配置错误、远端设备漏洞和身分管理漏洞，企业正在向零信任架构转型，以实现持续检验和细粒度的存取控制。勒索软体、网路钓鱼宣传活动和未经授权的横向移动的兴起，进一步促使企业采用不预设自动信任的安全模型。随着数位生态系统的扩展，零信任为最大限度地降低风险敞口和增强长期网路安全稳健性提供了关键基础。

实施成本高且复杂

零信任架构市场受到高昂实施成本和技术复杂性的限制。实施零信任涉及升级身分基础设施、重新设计网路、加强端点检验以及建构持续监控系统。许多企业在从传统系统迁移到现代安全解决方案时面临财务压力。此外，专业知识、广泛的策略映射和复杂的整合流程也构成了额外的障碍。中小企业尤其难以应对前期成本和潜在的业务中断。由于零信任需要全面且分阶段的实施，企业可能会面临漫长且不断攀升的成本，这使得预算和技术资源有限的组织难以采用这种模式。

对安全远端和混合办公模式的需求日益增长

混合办公和远距办公环境的广泛普及显着拓展了零信任架构的成长机会。随着员工透过各种设备、家庭网路和外部地点进行连接，企业需要高阶安全防护来检验每个使用者和操作。零信任提供即时身分验证、基于风险的存取决策和端点检查，从而保障分散式办公团队的营运安全。云端协作平台、个人设备以及与外部合作伙伴协作的日益普及，进一步推动了以身分为中心的安全模型的需求。希望为分散式办公团队提供支援的企业正依靠零信任来最大限度地降低威胁并维持存取控制，这为市场供应商创造了强劲的成长前景。

网路威胁日益复杂，已超出安全能力范围。

网路威胁的演进速度远超防御手段，对零信任架构市场构成威胁。攻击者如今正采用复杂的策略，包括人工智慧驱动的恶意软体、深度造假身分盗窃、进阶凭证攻击和多层入侵技术。这些趋势给依赖严格身份验证、分析和持续监控的零信任架构带来了巨大压力。检测技术的滞后会导致漏洞并延误事件回应。诸如API篡改、云端基础攻击和加密通讯漏洞利用等新风险进一步加剧了防护措施的复杂性。随着网路犯罪分子不断创新，攻击技术和防御工具之间的差距可能会进一步扩大，从而威胁零信任系统的长期稳健性。

新冠疫情的影响：

新冠疫情为零信任架构市场注入了强劲动力，因为企业迅速转型为远端和混合办公模式。由于员工分散在不同的地点和网路中工作，传统的以边界为中心的安全防护已无法提供足够的保护。快速的云端依赖、虚拟协作工具和数位转型加剧了安全风险，使得主导身分的安全防护至关重要。零信任架构凭藉持续检验、严格的存取控制和装置合规性监控成为重中之重。疫情也导致网路安全事件激增，迫使企业加强防御。因此，新冠疫情加速了零信任架构的普及，并重塑了企业未来的安全规划。

预计在预测期内，网路安全领域将占据最大的市场份额。

预计在预测期内，网路安全领域将占据最大的市场份额，因为它作为控制互动、流量交换和存取试验的基础层。零信任策略依赖透过网路分段、即时可见性和基于身分的存取规则来强化网路路径。随着企业在混合的本地和云端环境中运营，确保用户、设备和应用程式之间的通讯成为重中之重。网路安全可确保对内部流量进行详细监控，从而限制攻击者的横向移动和未授权存取。随着对云端平台、远端操作和连网数位系统的依赖性日益增强，企业需要依靠强大的基于网路的保护措施来有效满足零信任要求。

预计在预测期内，医疗保健产业将实现最高的复合年增长率。

在预测期内，医疗保健产业预计将呈现最高的成长率，这主要得益于快速的数位转型、电子健康记录的广泛应用以及对远端医疗和互联健康技术的日益依赖。随着敏感的患者数据在云端环境、远端设备和合作伙伴网路之间传输，该行业面临日益严峻的网路威胁。零信任架构提供身分管理、端点检验和网路分段等功能，以保护复杂的医疗保健生态系统。虚拟医疗模式的扩展、远端患者监护以及整合数位健康系统的普及，进一步推动了对严格检验和存取控制的需求。随着医疗保健技术的不断发展，零信任架构对于确保安全性和服务可靠性至关重要。

占比最大的地区：

北美预计将在整个预测期内保持最大的市场份额，这得益于其高度发达的网路安全环境、强大的技术基础设施以及对保护敏感资料的坚定承诺。领先的零信任提供者以及银行、医疗保健和公共部门等领域的先锋企业正在推动零信任技术的普及应用。法规结构、政府主导的倡议以及私人投资都在推动以身分为中心和分段式安全模型的部署。该地区的企业越来越依赖持续检验、零信任存取控制和即时监控来保护混合云端系统和云端系统。这种主导地位不仅凸显了该地区在网路安全创新方面的实力，也反映了其对日益增长的网路风险的积极应对。

年复合成长率最高的地区：

预计亚太地区在预测期内将实现最高的复合年增长率，这主要得益于数位化进程的强劲推进、政府主导的网路防御计划以及开发中国家云端服务日益普及。随着企业基础设施的现代化，印度、中国、日本和澳洲等国家正在增加网路安全投资。远距办公的广泛应用，以及物联网和连网设备的激增，促使企业更加依赖基于身分的安全机制。亚太地区的企业正越来越多地采用零信任安全策略来保护其现代化基础设施，这使得该地区对安全服务提供者而言具有重要的战略意义。

免费客製化服务：

购买此报告的客户可以选择以下免费自订选项之一：

• 公司概况
  • 对其他市场公司（最多 3 家公司）进行全面分析
  • 对主要企业进行SWOT分析（最多3家公司）
• 区域细分
  • 根据客户要求，提供主要国家的市场估算和预测以及复合年增长率（註：可行性需确认）。
• 竞争基准化分析
  • 根据主要企业的产品系列、地理覆盖范围和策略联盟基准化分析

目录

第一章执行摘要

第二章 前言

• 概述
• 相关利益者
• 调查范围
• 调查方法
  • 资料探勘
  • 数据分析
  • 数据检验
  • 研究途径
• 研究材料
  • 原始研究资料
  • 次级研究资讯来源
  • 先决条件

第三章 市场趋势分析

• 介绍
• 司机
• 抑制因素
• 机会
• 威胁
• 终端用户分析
• 新兴市场
• 新冠疫情的影响

第四章 波特五力分析

• 供应商的议价能力
• 买方的议价能力
• 替代品的威胁
• 新进入者的威胁
• 竞争对手之间的竞争

5. 全球零信任架构市场（以组件划分）

• 介绍
• 解决方案
• 服务

6. 全球零信任架构市场（依安全功能划分）

• 介绍
• 网路安全
• 资料安全
• 端点安全
• 应用程式安全
• 云端安全

7. 全球零信任架构市场（依身分验证类型划分）

• 介绍
• 单因素身份验证
• 多因素身份验证

8. 全球零信任架构市场依部署模式划分

• 介绍
• 云端基础的
• 本地部署

9. 依组织规模分類的全球零信任架构市场

• 介绍
• 小型企业
• 大公司

第十章 全球零信任架构市场（以最终用户划分）

• 介绍
• 银行、金融服务和保险 (BFSI)
• 资讯科技与资讯科技服务
• 政府和国防部
• 卫生保健
• 零售与电子商务
• 能源与公共产业
• 其他最终用户

第十一章 全球零信任架构市场（按地区划分）

• 介绍
• 北美洲
  • 美国
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
• 欧洲
  • 德国
  • 英国
  • 义大利
  • 法国
  • 西班牙
  • 其他欧洲
• 亚太地区
  • 日本
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 澳洲
  • 纽西兰
  • 韩国
  • 亚太其他地区
• 南美洲
  • 阿根廷
  • 巴西
  • 智利
  • 其他南美洲
• 中东和非洲
  • 沙乌地阿拉伯
  • 阿拉伯聯合大公国
  • 卡达
  • 南非
  • 其他中东和非洲地区

第十二章 重大进展

• 协议、伙伴关係、合作和合资企业
• 收购与併购
• 新产品上市
• 业务拓展
• 其他关键策略

第十三章：企业概况

• Palo Alto Networks
• Cisco Systems
• Zscaler
• Microsoft Corporation
• Fortinet
• Check Point Software Technologies
• Okta
• Netskope
• CrowdStrike
• Cloudflare
• IBM Corporation
• Google LLC
• Akamai Technologies
• SentinelOne
• StrongDM

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Zero Trust Architecture Market is accounted for $40.53 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $125.34 billion by 2032 growing at a CAGR of 17.5% during the forecast period. Zero Trust Architecture is a cybersecurity model centered on the idea that no user or device should be trusted by default, requiring continuous verification before allowing access to any system or data. Instead of assuming internal network safety, it enforces strong identity checks, micro-segmentation, and strict least-privilege permissions. This approach ensures every request is monitored, validated, and evaluated for potential risk, significantly minimizing exposure to cyberattacks and restricting unauthorized lateral movement. Designed to protect cloud platforms, remote operations, and mixed IT environments, Zero Trust helps organizations enhance data protection, reduce breach likelihood, and maintain a more secure, resilient, and controlled digital ecosystem.

According to National Institute of Standards and Technology, data shows in SP 800-207 that Zero Trust moves defenses from static, network-based perimeters to focus on users, assets, and resources. It requires continuous authentication and authorization before granting access.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Rising sophistication of cyberattacks

Growth in the Zero Trust Architecture market is largely fueled by the escalating complexity and volume of cyber threats impacting businesses worldwide. Conventional perimeter defenses fail to counter modern attacks such as credential theft, insider misuse, and persistent intrusions. With attackers exploiting cloud misconfigurations, remote device weaknesses, and identity loopholes, organizations are shifting to Zero Trust for continuous verification and granular access control. Increasing incidents of ransomware, phishing campaigns, and unauthorized lateral movements are further pushing enterprises to adopt a security model without automatic trust. As digital ecosystems expand, Zero Trust provides a critical foundation for minimizing exposure and enhancing long-term cybersecurity robustness.

Restraint:

High implementation costs and complexity

The Zero Trust Architecture market faces constraints due to substantial deployment expenses and technical intricacies. Implementing Zero Trust involves upgrading identity frameworks, redesigning networks, enhancing endpoint verification, and setting up continuous monitoring systems. Many businesses encounter financial pressure when transitioning from outdated systems to modern security solutions. Additional barriers arise from the need for specialized expertise, extensive policy mapping, and complex integration processes. Smaller firms especially struggle with upfront costs and potential workflow interruptions. Since Zero Trust requires a comprehensive and staged rollout, companies may experience extended timelines and rising expenditures, making the model harder to adopt for organizations with limited budgets or technical resources.

Opportunity:

Expanding need for secure remote and hybrid workforce models

The widespread move to hybrid and remote work environments significantly boosts the opportunity for Zero Trust Architecture growth. With employees connecting from diverse devices, home networks, and off-site locations, organizations require advanced safeguards that verify every user and action. Zero Trust delivers real-time authentication, risk-based access decisions, and endpoint checks to secure dispersed workforce operations. Rising use of cloud collaboration platforms, personal devices and external partner integrations further increases demand for identity-centric security models. Companies aiming to strengthen distributed work environments rely on Zero Trust to minimize threats and maintain controlled access, creating strong expansion prospects for market vendors.

Threat:

Rising complexity of cyber threats outpacing security capabilities

The Zero Trust Architecture market is increasingly threatened by cyber threats that advance more rapidly than defensive capabilities. Attackers now use complex strategies such as AI-powered malware, deepfake identity fraud, sophisticated credential attacks, and layered intrusion methods. These developments strain Zero Trust implementations, which depend on precise identity checks, analytics, and continuous oversight. Any lag in detection technology can create vulnerabilities or slow incident response. Emerging risks from API manipulation, cloud-based attacks, and encrypted traffic exploitation further complicate protection efforts. As cybercriminals continue to innovate, the gap between attack methods and defensive tools may grow, undermining the long-term strength of Zero Trust systems.

Covid-19 Impact:

COVID-19 created strong momentum for the Zero Trust Architecture market as companies transitioned rapidly to remote and hybrid operations. With employees working from diverse locations and networks, conventional perimeter-focused security could no longer provide adequate protection. The surge in cloud dependence, virtual collaboration tools, and digital transformation widened security risks, making identity-driven protection essential. Zero Trust became a priority due to its continuous verification, strict access controls, and device compliance monitoring. The pandemic also fueled a rise in cyber incidents, prompting organizations to strengthen their defenses. As a result, COVID-19 accelerated Zero Trust adoption and reshaped enterprise security planning for the future.

The network security segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The network security segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period because it acts as the foundational layer for controlling interactions, traffic exchanges, and access attempts. Zero Trust strategies depend on reinforcing network routes through segmentation, real-time visibility, and identity-governed access rules. As enterprises operate in mixed on-premise and cloud ecosystems, securing communication across users, devices, and applications becomes a top priority. Network security ensures detailed oversight of internal traffic, limiting lateral attacker movement and unauthorized access. With growing reliance on cloud platforms, remote operations, and interconnected digital systems, organizations rely on strong network-based safeguards to uphold Zero Trust requirements effectively.

The healthcare segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

Over the forecast period, the healthcare segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate because of its rapid digital transformation, rising use of electronic medical records, and dependence on telehealth and connected healthcare technologies. The industry faces heightened exposure to cyber threats as critical patient data travels across cloud environments, remote endpoints, and partner networks. Zero Trust provides the identity control, endpoint validation, and network segmentation required to secure complex medical ecosystems. Expanding virtual care models, remote patient monitoring, and integrated digital health systems further increase the need for strict verification and controlled access. As healthcare evolves technologically, Zero Trust becomes crucial for ensuring security and service reliability.

Region with largest share:

During the forecast period, the North America region is expected to hold the largest market share due to its well-developed cybersecurity environment, strong technological infrastructure, and deep commitment to securing sensitive data. Major Zero Trust providers and forward-thinking enterprises across sectors such as banking, healthcare, and public institutions drive adoption. Regulatory frameworks, government initiatives, and private investments all promote deployment of identity-centric and segmented security models. Firms in the region increasingly rely on continuous verification, zero-trust access controls, and real-time monitoring to defend their hybrid and cloud systems. This dominance highlights not only the region's innovation in cybersecurity but also its proactive response to escalating cyber risks.

Region with highest CAGR:

Over the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is anticipated to exhibit the highest CAGR due to its strong push toward digitalization, governmental cyber-defense programs, and rising use of cloud services in developing economies. Countries such as India, China, Japan, and Australia are increasing their cybersecurity investments as businesses overhaul their infrastructure. The trend of remote working, combined with a surge in IoT and interconnected devices, is driving greater reliance on identity-based security. As firms across the Asia-Pacific strive to safeguard their modern infrastructures, they are increasingly adopting Zero Trust, making the region strategically important for providers.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players in Zero Trust Architecture Market include Palo Alto Networks, Cisco Systems, Zscaler, Microsoft Corporation, Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies, Okta, Netskope, CrowdStrike, Cloudflare, IBM Corporation, Google LLC, Akamai Technologies, SentinelOne and StrongDM.

Key Developments:

In October 2025, Microsoft and OpenAI have shared a vision to advance artificial intelligence responsibly and make its benefits broadly accessible. What began as an investment in a research organization has grown into one of the most successful partnerships in our industry. As we enter the next phase of this partnership, we've signed a new definitive agreement that builds on our foundation, strengthens our partnership, and sets the stage for long-term success for both organizations.

In October 2025, Cisco announced an expanded partnership with NVIDIA to combine two of the most widely used networking portfolios: Cisco Silicon One and NVIDIA Spectrum-X Ethernet. This collaboration aimed to provide enterprises with unparalleled flexibility and options for their AI data center investments.

In February 2025, Akamai Technologies has finalized a strategic multi-year agreement with a major technology company, committing to spend over $100 million on cloud computing services. The partnership allows for the utilization of Akamai's comprehensive portfolio to enhance the customer's infrastructure.

Components Covered:

• Solutions
• Services

Security Capabilities Covered:

• Network Security
• Data Security
• Endpoint Security
• Application Security
• Cloud Security

Authentication Types Covered:

• Single-Factor Authentication
• Multi-Factor Authentication

Deployment Modes Covered:

• Cloud-Based
• On-Premises

Organization Sizes Covered:

• Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
• Large Enterprises

End Users Covered:

• BFSI (Banking, Financial Services, Insurance)
• IT & ITeS
• Government & Defense
• Healthcare
• Retail & E-commerce
• Energy & Utilities
• Other End Users

Regions Covered:

• North America
  • US
  • Canada
  • Mexico
• Europe
  • Germany
  • UK
  • Italy
  • France
  • Spain
  • Rest of Europe
• Asia Pacific
  • Japan
  • China
  • India
  • Australia
  • New Zealand
  • South Korea
  • Rest of Asia Pacific
• South America
  • Argentina
  • Brazil
  • Chile
  • Rest of South America
• Middle East & Africa
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE
  • Qatar
  • South Africa
  • Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:

• Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
• Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
• Covers Market data for the years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2028, and 2032
• Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
• Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
• Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
• Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
• Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

• Company Profiling
  • Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
  • SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
• Regional Segmentation
  • Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
• Competitive Benchmarking
  • Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

• 2.1 Abstract
• 2.2 Stake Holders
• 2.3 Research Scope
• 2.4 Research Methodology
  • 2.4.1 Data Mining
  • 2.4.2 Data Analysis
  • 2.4.3 Data Validation
  • 2.4.4 Research Approach
• 2.5 Research Sources
  • 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
  • 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
  • 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis

• 3.1 Introduction
• 3.2 Drivers
• 3.3 Restraints
• 3.4 Opportunities
• 3.5 Threats
• 3.6 End User Analysis
• 3.7 Emerging Markets
• 3.8 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

• 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
• 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
• 4.3 Threat of substitutes
• 4.4 Threat of new entrants
• 4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Component

• 5.1 Introduction
• 5.2 Solutions
• 5.3 Services

6 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Security Capability

• 6.1 Introduction
• 6.2 Network Security
• 6.3 Data Security
• 6.4 Endpoint Security
• 6.5 Application Security
• 6.6 Cloud Security

7 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Authentication Type

• 7.1 Introduction
• 7.2 Single-Factor Authentication
• 7.3 Multi-Factor Authentication

8 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Deployment Mode

• 8.1 Introduction
• 8.2 Cloud-Based
• 8.3 On-Premises

9 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Organization Size

• 9.1 Introduction
• 9.2 Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
• 9.3 Large Enterprises

10 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market, By End User

• 10.1 Introduction
• 10.2 BFSI (Banking, Financial Services, Insurance)
• 10.3 IT & ITeS
• 10.4 Government & Defense
• 10.5 Healthcare
• 10.6 Retail & E-commerce
• 10.7 Energy & Utilities
• 10.8 Other End Users

11 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market, By Geography

• 11.1 Introduction
• 11.2 North America
  • 11.2.1 US
  • 11.2.2 Canada
  • 11.2.3 Mexico
• 11.3 Europe
  • 11.3.1 Germany
  • 11.3.2 UK
  • 11.3.3 Italy
  • 11.3.4 France
  • 11.3.5 Spain
  • 11.3.6 Rest of Europe
• 11.4 Asia Pacific
  • 11.4.1 Japan
  • 11.4.2 China
  • 11.4.3 India
  • 11.4.4 Australia
  • 11.4.5 New Zealand
  • 11.4.6 South Korea
  • 11.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
• 11.5 South America
  • 11.5.1 Argentina
  • 11.5.2 Brazil
  • 11.5.3 Chile
  • 11.5.4 Rest of South America
• 11.6 Middle East & Africa
  • 11.6.1 Saudi Arabia
  • 11.6.2 UAE
  • 11.6.3 Qatar
  • 11.6.4 South Africa
  • 11.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

12 Key Developments

• 12.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
• 12.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
• 12.3 New Product Launch
• 12.4 Expansions
• 12.5 Other Key Strategies

13 Company Profiling

• 13.1 Palo Alto Networks
• 13.2 Cisco Systems
• 13.3 Zscaler
• 13.4 Microsoft Corporation
• 13.5 Fortinet
• 13.6 Check Point Software Technologies
• 13.7 Okta
• 13.8 Netskope
• 13.9 CrowdStrike
• 13.10 Cloudflare
• 13.11 IBM Corporation
• 13.12 Google LLC
• 13.13 Akamai Technologies
• 13.14 SentinelOne
• 13.15 StrongDM

List of Tables

• Table 1 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Region (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 2 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Component (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 3 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Solutions (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 4 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Services (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 5 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Security Capability (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 6 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Network Security (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 7 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Data Security (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 8 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Endpoint Security (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 9 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Application Security (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 10 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Cloud Security (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 11 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Authentication Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 12 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Single-Factor Authentication (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 13 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Multi-Factor Authentication (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 14 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Deployment Mode (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 15 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Cloud-Based (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 16 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By On-Premises (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 17 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Organization Size (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 18 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs) (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 19 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Large Enterprises (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 20 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By End User (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 21 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By BFSI (Banking, Financial Services, Insurance) (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 22 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By IT & ITeS (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 23 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Government & Defense (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 24 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Healthcare (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 25 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Retail & E-commerce (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 26 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Energy & Utilities (2024-2032) ($MN)
• Table 27 Global Zero Trust Architecture Market Outlook, By Other End Users (2024-2032) ($MN)

Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.