AI 副驾驶与物联网程式码产生：智慧助理协助嵌入式开发变革

本报告内容

人工智慧彻底改变了软体开发。开发工具提供者正在利用生成式人工智慧和自然语言处理的快速发展，帮助工程师自动化大量编码任务并加速原型设计。儘管人工智慧助理能够显着提升生产力，但嵌入式工程组织必须谨慎对待，因为自动化本身就存在安全性和品质风险。能够透过客製化防护机制、工具整合、最佳实践指导和模型优化，有效平衡安全性、品质和流程加速的商业解决方案，将在这个年轻且快速成长的 AI 副驾驶和程式码生成解决方案市场中占先机，抢占先机。

本报告对物联网和嵌入式软体开发中的 AI 副驾驶和程式码产生生态系统进行了全面分析。本报告探讨了目前基于代理的 AI 和 AI 编码工具的功能和局限性、它们与领先的 IDE、DevOps 流水线和嵌入式工具链的整合，以及这些工具在多大程度上满足物联网和边缘计算部署的性能和监管要求。

本报告也分析了相关的併购交易、LLM 生态系统、授权策略、对基于代理程式的 IDE 和 AI 产生程式码的担忧，以及主要供应商的概况。该报告还提供了 2024 年至 2029 年的市场规模和预测，并按产品类型（通用解决方案 vs. 专用解决方案）、地区、垂直行业和主要供应商对市场进行了细分和解释。

探讨了哪些问题？

• 哪些因素推动了对 AI 增强型副驾驶和程式码产生解决方案的需求？
• 开发工具提供者如何增强其产品组合，以满足对 AI 驱动的开发解决方案的需求？
• 哪些垂直市场将推动这个快速成长领域的市场成长？
• 安全及安保关键产业何时会大规模采用 AI 程式码产生？
• 为什么工程师喜欢基于代理的解决方案而不是轻量级助手？
• 哪些公司正在推动产品创新并影响市场？

本报告的技术供应商

报告摘录

利用人工智慧提高专案进度达标率

目录

该报告的内容

摘要整理

• 主要调查结果

调查范围和调查手法论

• 了解人工智慧
• AI Copilot 和程式码产生工具

全球市场概览

• 代理程式改变人工智慧程式码生成，课题 Copilot
• 策略考虑因素
  • 法学硕士 (LLM) 的选择和支持直接影响市场可及性
  • 人工智慧工具授权策略和趋势
  • JetBrains 与 Cursor，人工智慧的崛起IDE
  • 安全性和程式码品质问题阻碍 AI 的普及
• 最近的趋势
  • M&A

地区趋势与预测

• 南北美洲
• 欧洲，中东·非洲
• 亚太地区

垂直市场趋势与预测

• 航太及防卫
• 汽车
• 通讯与网路
• 工业自动化

竞争情形

• 现有的嵌入式软体解决方案供应商必须适应 AI 驱动的颠覆性变革

最终用户洞察

• 嵌入式工程组织对采用 AI 持谨慎态度AI 助手，变革迫在眉睫
• 使用 AI 可提高专案进度执行率
• 使用 AI 产生程式码的嵌入式工程师对软体堆迭表现出强烈的偏好
• 不同组织类型的工程师使用 AI 执行类似任务

关于作者

Inside this Report

AI has fundamentally reshaped software development. Development tool providers have successfully leveraged the rapid evolution of generative AI and natural language processing to help engineers automate large portions of the coding process and accelerate prototyping. Despite massive productivity benefits, automation comes with inherent security and quality risks that force embedded engineering organizations to approach AI-powered assistants with caution. Commercial solutions that can effectively blend security, quality, and process acceleration through custom guardrails, tool integrations, best practices guidance, and model refinement will reap early share in this young but rapidly emerging space for AI copilots and code generation solutions.

This report delivers a comprehensive analysis of the AI copilots and code generation ecosystem as it applies to IoT and embedded software development. It examines the capabilities and limitations of current agentic AI and AI coding tools, their integration with popular IDEs, DevOps pipelines, and embedded toolchains, and the extent to which these tools can meet the performance and regulatory requirements of IoT and edge computing deployments. The report also includes an analysis of relevant mergers and acquisitions, LLM ecosystems, licensing strategies, agentic IDEs, concerns with AI generated code, and profiles of leading vendors. The study includes market sizing and forecasts from 2024 to 2029 with commentary and segmentations by product type (general purpose versus application-specialized solutions), region vertical market, and leading vendors.

What Questions are Addressed?

• What factors are driving demand for AI-enhanced copilots and code generation solutions?
• How can development tool providers strengthen their portfolios to capitalize on demand for AI- powered development solutions?
• Which vertical markets will lead market growth in this burgeoning sector?
• When will safety- and security-critical industries adopt AI code generation at scale?
• Why do engineers favor agentic solutions over lightweight assistants?
• Which companies are driving product innovation and influencing the market?

Who Should Read this Report?

This report was written for those making critical decisions regarding product, market, channel, and competitive strategy and tactics. This report is intended for senior decision-makers who are developing, or are a part of the ecosystem of, AI assistants and code generation tools, including:

Technology Providers in this Report:

Demand-side Research Overview

VDC launches numerous surveys of the IoT and embedded engineering ecosystem every year using an online survey platform. To support this research, VDC leverages its in-house panel of more than 30,000 individuals from various roles and industries across the world. Our global Voice of the Engineer survey recently captured insights from a total of 600 qualified respondents. This survey was used to inform our insight into key trends, preferences, and predictions within the engineering community.

Executive Summary

AI code generation is emerging as one of the most disruptive forces in IoT software development since the advent of open source. Enterprise/IT organizations eagerly adopted AI-powered coding tools with little hesitation, but demand for code generation capabilities from embedded engineering organizations has lagged behind, resulting in a blossoming opportunity for AI copilot and code generation vendors beginning primarily in 2025. AI copilots accelerate software development, helping engineering organizations cope with the increasing complexity of software codebases and their core role in product-level differentiation. For engineering and product development organizations across industries, AI promises to bridge skill gaps, reduce time to market, and improve developer productivity.

This acceleration in automated coding, however, also increases the need for rigorous quality assurance, compliance checks, and additional security. Currently, there is a large gap in the market for a complete solution that offers safety-critical software testing and analysis alongside standards-compliant code generation. AI-generated code can introduce vulnerabilities, licensing risks, or inefficiencies that are difficult to detect without robust testing and software composition analysis (SCA) in the background. Many of the leading AI development tool vendors do not have partnerships or experience in embedded software development, creating an opportunity for organizations with a long tenure in embedded engineering to partner with AI leaders to safely and securely bring AI-generated code to the IoT for all use cases.

Copilots and code generation will take hold in embedded engineering over the next five years. In the near term, adoption will be strongest in non-safety-critical IoT segments such as communications & networking, consumer electronics, and smart home, where AI-assisted coding can quickly prove ROI without extensive regulatory overhead. As certification bodies and standards organizations formalize guidelines for AI-generated code, safety-critical engineering organizations will adopt copilots more eagerly. To capture a portion of the growing safety-critical market share, vendors must add compliance support, code provenance tracking, and integrate with popular software verification and validation tools.

Key Findings:

• Demand for application- and domain-specialized code generation will accelerate rapidly as embedded engineering organizations embrace AI to add greater amounts of software-driven value to their products.
• As secure, purpose-built AI copilots go to market, the automotive vertical will grow the fastest as OEMs transition toward software-defined vehicle architectures and value-added software features that generate recurring revenue.
• Agentic AI will not only transform code generation but also the complete software development lifecycle as it automates design planning, QA, and project management.
• The Americas is a home market for many of the world's leading AI copilot and code generation solution vendors, contributing to its early market leadership.
• VDC's Voice of the Engineer survey data shows that AI tooling is effectively accelerating project timelines, helping engineers meet and exceed deadlines.

Report Excerpt

AI Usage Improves Project Schedule Adherence

Organizations leveraging AI for code generation are measurably outperforming their peers in project execution timelines. Engineering organizations employing AI-generated code are significantly more likely to beat expectations, with 38% reportedly ahead of their project schedules (2.1x more likely than organizations not using AI code generation). This discrepancy reflects AI's ability to automate foundational coding tasks, accelerate iteration cycles, and reduce delays caused by manual development bottlenecks.

The sharp difference in three to six month delays (3.0% of AI users versus 10.9% of non-AI users) and overall reduction in delays among AI code users suggest that engineering organizations benefit from AI's ability to preempt errors and improve code reliability earlier in the lifecycle. AI code generation tools that generate boilerplate or repetitive code components allow engineers to focus on architecture, integration, and optimization, which are key elements for fueling product innovation and differentiation in traditional workflows. In edge AI contexts, where deployment environments are heterogeneous and performance tuning is critical, complex task automation (e.g., model integration or hardware abstraction) enables teams to compress development cycles and better align with shifting project requirements. AI-integrated software development strategies free up developers to work proactively on value-creating features. As a result, solution providers should position AI code generation not just as a developer aid, but as a catalyst for predictable, repeatable acceleration, which is especially compelling in embedded markets defined by deployment complexity and constrained engineering resources.

Table of Contents

Inside this Report

Executive Summary

• Key Findings

Report Scope & Methodology

• Understanding AI
• AI Copilots & Code Generation Tools

Global Market Overview

• Agents Will Transform AI Code Generation and Challenge Copilots
• Strategic Considerations
  • LLM Selection and Support Directly Impacts Market Addressability
  • AI Tool Licensing Strategies and Trends
  • JetBrains Versus Cursor and the Rise of AI IDEs
  • Security and Code Quality Concerns Deter AI Adoption
• Recent Developments
  • Mergers and Acquisitions

Regional Trends & Forecast

• Americas
• Europe, Middle East, and Africa
• Asia-Pacific

Vertical Market Trends & Forecast

• Aerospace & Defense
• Automotive
• Communications & Networking
• Industrial Automation

Competitive Landscape

• Incumbent Embedded Software Solution Providers Must Adapt to AI Disruption

End-User Insights

• Embedded Engineering Organizations are Slow to Adopt AI Assistants, but Change is Imminent
• AI Usage Improves Project Schedule Adherence
• Embedded Engineers Using AI-generated Code Demonstrate Strong Software Stack Preferences
• Engineers Use AI for Similar Tasks Across Organization Types

About the Authors

List of Exhibits:

• Exhibit 1: Global Revenue of Copilots & Code Generation Tools & Related Services Segmented by Tool Type
• Exhibit 2: Percentage of Global Revenue from Copilots & Code Generation Tools & Related Services Segmented by Tool Type
• Exhibit 3: Current Concerns About AI-generated Software Code
• Exhibit 4: Global Revenue of Copilots & Code Generation Tools & Related Services Segmented by Geographic Region
• Exhibit 5: Percentage of Global Revenue from Copilots & Code Generation Tools & Related Services Segmented by Geographic Region
• Exhibit 6: Amount of Trust in AI-generated Software Code Segmented by Vertical Market
• Exhibit 7: Global Revenue of Copilots & Code Generation Tools & Related Services Segmented by Vertical Market
• Exhibit 8: Percentage of Global Revenue from Copilots & Code Generation Tools & Related Services Segmented by Vertical Market
• Exhibit 9: 2024 Percentage of Global Revenue from Copilots & Code Generation Tools & Related Services Segmented by Leading Vendors
• Exhibit 10: 2025 Estimated Market Share of Global Revenue from Copilots & Code Generation Tools & Related Services Segmented by Leading Vendors:
• Exhibit 11: Consideration/Use of AI-generated Software/Code (e.g., Use of Copilot and/or Prompt-based Code Creation)
• Exhibit 12: Expected Changes in Use of AI-generated Software in the Next Three Years
• Exhibit 13: Current Project's Schedule Adherence Segmented by AI-generated Code Usage
• Exhibit 14: Embedded Software Stack Components Required on Current/Most Recent Project Segmented by AI-generated Code Usage

IoT & Embedded Engineering Survey (Partial list):

• Exhibit 1: Primary Role Within Company/Organization
• Exhibit 2: Respondent's Organization's Primary Industry
• Exhibit 3: Total Number of Employees at Respondent's Organization
• Exhibit 4: Primary Region of Residence
• Exhibit 5: Primary Country of Residence
• Exhibit 6: Type of Most Current or Recent Project
• Exhibit 7: Involvement with Engineering of an Embedded/Edge, Enterprise/IT, HPC, AI/ML, or Mobile/System Device or Solution
• Exhibit 8: Type of Purchase by Respondent's Organization
• Exhibit 9: Primary Industry Classification of Project
• Exhibit 10: Type of Aerospace & Defense Application for Most Recent Project
• Exhibit 11: Type of Automotive In-Vehicle Application for Most Recent Project
• Exhibit 12: Type of Communications & Networking Application for Most Recent Project
• Exhibit 13: Type of Consumer Electronics Application for Most Recent Project
• Exhibit 14: Type of Digital Security Application for Most Recent Project
• Exhibit 15: Type of Digital Signage Application for Most Recent Project
• Exhibit 16: Type of Energy and Utilities Application for Most Recent Project
• Exhibit 17: Type of Gaming Application for Most Recent Project
• Exhibit 18: Type of Industrial Automation Application for Most Recent Project
• Exhibit 19: Type of Media & Broadcasting Application for Most Recent Project
• Exhibit 20: Type of Medical Device Application for Most Current Project
• Exhibit 21: Type of Mobile Phone
• Exhibit 22: Type of Office/Business Automation Application for Most Recent Project