2026-2032 年捕碳封存市场（按应用、储存方法、最终用户产业和地区划分）

捕碳封存（CCS）市场评估，2026-2032

旨在遏制温室气体排放的全球法规日益严格，正在推动各行各业采用碳捕获技术。随着世界各国根据《巴黎协定》制定雄心勃勃的气候目标，发电、炼钢、水泥等产业面临减少碳排放的压力。 CCS 提供了一种可行的解决方案，它直接从这些排放源捕获二氧化碳并防止其进入大气。此外，研发投入的增加也推动了 CCS 技术的进步，使其更有效率、更具成本效益。捕获方法、运输基础设施和地质储存解决方案的进步正在帮助扩大CCS市场，预计到2024年销售额将达到43亿美元以上，到2032年将达到54.6亿美元。

此外，CCS市场正受到技术创新的驱动。富氧燃烧和直接空气捕获等新技术能够更有效地从工业製程甚至环境空气中分离二氧化碳。这些技术进步对于提高二氧化碳捕获系统的效率至关重要。此外，运输基础设施的进步，例如更好的二氧化碳油轮设计和改进的管道，使得捕获的碳能够有效运输。最后，地质储存方案的改进，例如改进的监测方法和场地特性，确保了捕获的二氧化碳的安全、长期储存，使 CCS 成为更可靠、更有吸引力的气候变迁缓解方案。预计未来几年市场将稳定成长，2026 年至 2032 年的复合年增长率约为 3.33%。

捕碳封存市场定义/概述

在发电厂和工业排放的二氧化碳（CO2）进入环境之前将其捕获的技术是捕碳封存（CCS）领域的核心。然后，这些二氧化碳可以被捕获并转移到地质结构中，例如盐水层或枯竭的石油和天然气蕴藏量，在那里可以无限期地储存。作为减少温室气体排放的一种手段，CCS是应对气候变迁的重要武器。 CCS应用范围广泛，重点是二氧化碳排放高​​的地区。 CCS 可以使天然气和燃煤发电厂大幅减少排放。同样，水泥厂、钢铁厂和炼油厂等工业设施可以封存其运作过程中排放的二氧化碳。 CCS市场前景光明。由于严格的环境法和投资者对永续解决方案的兴趣日益浓厚，市场正在不断扩大。由于捕获技术、运输基础设施和储存技术的改进，CCS 变得更加高效和经济。在世界努力实现净零排放的背景下，捕碳封存（CCS）有望成为多个产业脱碳和减轻气候变迁影响的关键因素。

日益严格的环境法规是否会推动捕碳封存市场的成长？

各国政府正向排放大量温室气体（尤其是二氧化碳）的产业施压，要求遵守日益严格的法规。可能的例子有水泥厂、钢铁厂、炼油厂和发电厂。 CCS技术将使这些产业能够继续运转，并大幅减少碳排放。透过将排放气体储存在地下，在它们被释放到环境之前将其捕获，公司可以遵守法规并避免问题。

许多司法管辖区正在考虑和实施碳定价策略，包括总量管制与交易和碳排放税。这些计划对碳排放征收价格，增加了企业的污染成本。在这种情况下，CCS 开始具有经济意义。透过捕获和储存排放，企业可以减少其整体碳排放影响并避免缴纳高额的碳排放税。希望这样的经济奖励能够鼓励对 CCS 技术的投资。

捕获设备的高成本是否会阻碍碳捕获和储存市场的成长？

捕碳封存（CCS）市场的主要障碍之一是CCS捕获设备成本高。对于已经面临竞争的公司来说，与坚持当前做法相比，在 CCS 设备上进行大量的前期投资似乎存在财务风险。这种犹豫阻碍了企业进行 CCS 投资，从而限制了流入市场的资本数量。儘管 CCS 具有潜在的环境效益，但资金的缺乏阻碍了该技术的大规模研究和实施，减缓了市场扩张。

即使公司有能力为 CCS 设备的初始投资提供资金，捕碳封存(CCS) 市场的成长也可能因持续的营运成本而受到严重阻碍。捕获碳的过程需要消耗更多的能源，从而增加成本。收集设备的维修和保养成本也很高。这些因素限制了公司的利润率，并使他们不愿采用 CCS，特别是如果减少排放所节省的成本不能立即显现出来。这阻碍了 CCS 的广泛采用并减缓了 CCS 市场的整体扩张。当环境效益不能立即转化为现金回报时尤其如此。

CCS 捕获设备的高成本及其采用的有限性限制了捕碳封存(CCS) 领域的扩张。 CCS 可能只对少数拥有雄厚财力的大型工业排放具有实用性。儘管该技术是整体排放的主要原因，但对于中小型企业来说，其成本却过高。结果是，市场出现分化，大公司可以使用 CCS 作为解决方案，而中小型公司却没有切实可行的方法来减少碳排放。这种有限的范围大大降低了 CCS 作为更广泛的排放策略的整体有效性。 CCS 只有让更多的人而不是少数人能够使用，才能充分发挥其潜力。

地质储存的使用增加是否会推动捕碳封存市场的成长？

捕获的二氧化碳（CO2）地质储存的使用日益增多，对推动捕碳封存（CCS）市场具有巨大的潜力。盐水含水层和枯竭的石油和天然气蕴藏量是可以为捕获的二氧化碳提供安全、长期储存的深层地质构造的例子。二氧化碳一旦进入，就会储存在这些地质构造中，数千年内都无法再释放。这可以理解为防止温室气体排放到大气中、减缓气候变迁的长期策略。安全储存要素增强了 CCS 的环境合理性，使其成为应对气候变迁及其带来的环境挑战的更强有力的武器。

支持 CCS 长期可行性和扩充性的关键要素是地质储存。与其他有限的封存技术相比，地质构造提供了巨大的二氧化碳容量。这些地质构造，如海水含水层和枯竭的石油和天然气蕴藏量，可以储存大量捕获的二氧化碳。这种巨大的储存容量意味着，随着 CCS 得到更广泛的应用，它可以帮助管理各行各业排放的大量二氧化碳。为了使 CCS 充分发挥其潜力，扩充性至关重要。 CCS 在应对气候变迁中发挥关键作用，因为它可以安全、永久地将越来越多的二氧化碳封存在地下。

透过成本优化，地质储存为 CCS 业务的成长提供了两大优势：首先，与其他更受限制的储存选项相比，地质构造的巨大容量使其能够进行有效储存，从而有可能降低每单位二氧化碳的储存成本。其次，可以利用石油和天然气产业现有的基础设施进行二氧化碳的注入和运输。枯竭的油气储存可用作储存设施，天然气管道可改造用于运输二氧化碳。透过利用现有的基础设施，可以显着降低建设新仓储设施的初始成本。这些成本优化使 CCS 成为更广泛行业中具有经济吸引力的提案，特别是那些先前由于高昂的储存成本而无法进入的行业。透过降低进入的经济门槛，地质储存可以在扩大 CCS 市场和使该技术成为应对气候变迁的更易于使用的工具方面发挥关键作用。

竞争格局

捕碳封存（CCS）市场是一个新兴市场，老牌能源公司和创新新兴企业之间的竞争非常激烈。石油和天然气行业的现有企业将带来其在大型计划上的工作经验，而新参与企业将提供新的技术解决方案。这种动态正在引发捕获方法（燃烧前、燃烧后、富氧燃料）、运输选择（管道、船舶）和储存解决方案（地质构造）方面的竞争。未来几年，随着市场逐渐成熟，我们预计会看到更多的整合和策略联盟。

2024年5月，国际能源总署（IEA）发布了碳捕获、利用和储存（CCUS）部署的最新进展。报告强调了显着的成长，宣布的2030年捕获能力将与前一年同期比较增35%，到2023年储存能力将成长70%。这标誌着全球CCS计划的加速发展。

印度海峡研究公司 2024 年 4 月发布的一份报告预测，到 2032 年，全球捕碳封存(CCS) 市场规模将达到 52.6 亿美元，复合年增长率为 6.5%，表明 CCS 技术市场正在扩大。

目录

第一章 引言

• 市场定义
• 市场区隔
• 调查方法

第二章执行摘要

• 主要发现
• 市场概览
• 市集亮点

第三章市场概述

• 市场规模和成长潜力
• 市场趋势
• 市场驱动因素
• 市场限制
• 市场机会
• 波特五力分析

第四章捕碳封存市场（依应用）

• 发电
• 石油和天然气加工
• 工业生产
• 直接空气捕获

第五章捕碳封存市场（以储存方式）

• 地质储存
• 海洋储存
• 矿业

第六章捕碳封存市场（依最终用户产业）

• 能源领域
• 石油和天然气
• 工业部门
• 其他最终用户

第七章区域分析

• 北美洲
• 美国
• 加拿大
• 墨西哥
• 欧洲
• 英国
• 德国
• 法国
• 义大利
• 亚太地区
• 中国
• 日本
• 印度
• 澳洲
• 拉丁美洲
• 巴西
• 阿根廷
• 智利
• 中东和非洲
• 南非
• 沙乌地阿拉伯
• 阿拉伯聯合大公国

第八章市场动态

• 市场驱动因素
• 市场限制
• 市场机会
• COVID-19 市场影响

第九章 竞争态势

• 主要企业
• 市场占有率分析

第十章 公司简介

• ExxonMobil Corporation（USA）
• Schlumberger Limited（USA）
• Chevron Corporation（USA）
• Shell plc（UK/Netherlands）
• National Oil Corporation（UAE）
• Baker Hughes Company（USA）
• Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.（Japan）
• Fluor Corporation（USA）
• SaskPower（Canada）
• China National Petroleum Corporation（China）

第十一章 市场展望与机会

• 新兴技术
• 未来市场趋势
• 投资机会

第十二章 附录

• 简称列表
• 来源和参考文献

Carbon Capture and Storage Market Valuation - 2026-2032

The increasing stringent global regulations aimed at curbing greenhouse gas emissions are pushing industries towards adopting carbon capture technologies. As countries worldwide set ambitious climate goals aligned with the Paris Agreement, industries like power generation, steel manufacturing, and cement production are facing mounting pressure to reduce their carbon footprint. CCS offers a viable solution by capturing CO2 emissions directly from these sources, preventing them from entering the atmosphere. Furthermore, growing investments in research and development are leading to advancements in CCS technology, making it more efficient and cost-effective. Advancements in capture methods, transportation infrastructure, and geological storage solutions are contributing to a more robust CCS market expansion is predicted to push market sales above USD 4.3 Billion in 2024 and reach USD 5.46 Billion by 2032.

Furthermore, the market for CCS is driven by innovation. New technologies like oxy-fuel combustion and direct air capture allow more effective CO2 separation from industrial processes and even the ambient air. These technological advancements are crucial for improving the efficiency of CO2 capture systems. Furthermore, the effective delivery of captured carbon is being made possible by advancements in transportation infrastructure, such as better CO2 tanker designs and upgraded pipelines. Last but not least, improvements in geological storage options, such as improved monitoring methods and site characterization, are guaranteeing the safe and long-term sequestration of CO2 captured, making CCS a more dependable and alluring climate change mitigation option. The market is expected to rise steadily in the coming years to grow at a CAGR of about 3.33% from 2026 to 2032.

Carbon Capture and Storage Market: Definition/ Overview

The technologies that capture carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from power plants and industrial operations before they enter the environment are at the center of the Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) sector. After being captured, this CO2 is moved and kept indefinitely in geological formations such as saline aquifers or exhausted oil and gas reserves. As a means of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, CCS is an essential weapon in the battle against climate change. CCS has a wide range of applications, with an emphasis on sectors with large CO2 footprints. With CCS, power plants that run on natural gas or coal can cut their emissions considerably. Likewise, industrial establishments such as cement plants, steel mills, and refineries have the ability to sequester carbon dioxide emissions that arise from their operations. The market for CCS seems to have a bright future. The market is expanding as a result of strict environmental laws and rising investor interest in sustainable solutions. CCS is becoming more efficient and economical with improvements in capture technologies, transportation infrastructure, and storage techniques. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is expected to be a key component in decarbonizing multiple industries and reducing the effects of climate change as the world works toward net-zero emissions.

Will Increasing Stricter Environmental Regulations Fuel the Growth of the Carbon Capture And Storage Market?

The growing stricter environmental regulations are expected to be a major driver for the growth of the carbon capture and storage (CCS) market, Governments everywhere are putting more pressure on sectors that produce considerable amounts of greenhouse gas emissions, especially carbon dioxide (CO2), to comply with their increasingly stringent regulations. Cement factories, steel mills, refineries, and power plants may be examples of this. These sectors can continue to function while drastically lowering their carbon footprint thanks to CCS technology. Companies can comply with regulations and stay out of trouble by storing emissions underground and catching them before they hit the environment.

Numerous areas are investigating or putting into practice carbon pricing strategies including cap-and-trade or carbon taxes. These systems impose a price on carbon emissions, increasing the cost of pollution for businesses. In this case, CCS starts to make economical sense. Businesses can lessen their overall carbon impact and possibly avoid paying hefty carbon taxes by capturing and storing their emissions. It is anticipated that this financial incentive will stimulate investment in CCS technologies.

Will the High Cost of Capture Equipment Hinder the Growth of the Carbon Capture And Storage Market?

The high cost of capture equipment is undeniably a significant roadblock for the growth of the carbon capture and storage (CCS) market, One of the main obstacles to the market for carbon capture and storage (CCS) is the high cost of CCS capture units. Compared to sticking with present practices, organizations who are already up against competition may find it financially risky to make the large upfront investment in CCS equipment. This reluctance deters businesses from making CCS investments, which in turn restricts the total amount of money entering the market. Despite the potential environmental benefits of CCS, this shortage of finance slows down the market's expansion by impeding the technology's larger-scale research and implementation.

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) market growth may be severely impeded by ongoing operating costs, even in cases where corporations are able to finance the initial investment in CCS equipment. The act of capturing needs more energy, which raises costs. The cost of servicing and maintaining the capture equipment is an additional expense. These elements limit a company's profit margins, which deters them from embracing CCS, particularly if the cost savings from lower emissions aren't immediately evident. This deters broad adoption and impedes the CCS market's overall expansion. Businesses are reluctant to spend money on technologies that could reduce their earnings, particularly if the environmental advantages don't result in quick cash returns.

The limited application caused by the high cost of CCS capture equipment limits the expansion of the carbon capture and storage (CCS) sector. A small number of large-scale industrial emitters with significant financial resources may be the only ones for whom CCS is practical. Despite being major contributors to overall emissions, smaller and medium-sized enterprises can find the technology prohibitively expensive. This results in a market that is divided into two tiers, with larger companies having the capacity to use CCS as a solution and smaller players having no practical way to lower their carbon footprint. This restricted applicability severely reduces CCS's overall efficacy as a strategy for more extensive emissions reduction. Only when the technology is made available to a larger number of businesses rather than just a few will CCS reach its full potential.

Will Increasing Usage of Geological Storage Drive the Growth of the Carbon Capture And Storage Market?

The increasing utilization of geological storage for captured carbon dioxide (CO2) holds immense potential to propel the carbon capture and storage (CCS) market forward, The benefits of CCS for the environment are greatly increased by its secure geological storage component. Saline aquifers and exhausted oil and gas reserves are examples of deep subterranean formations that provide as secure, long-term storage for captured CO2. Once introduced, the CO2 is stored in these geological formations and cannot be released again for thousands of years. This can be understood as a long-term strategy to prevent greenhouse gas emissions from entering the atmosphere and so mitigate climate change. The environmental justification for CCS is strengthened by the secure storage component, which makes it a more potent weapon in the battle against climate change and the environmental problems it causes.

One important element supporting CCS's long-term viability and scalability is geological storage. In contrast to other constrained storage techniques, geological formations provide enormous CO2 capacity. These formations can store enormous amounts of CO2 that have been captured, much like saltwater aquifers and exhausted oil and gas reserves. This enormous storage capacity gives hope that, when CCS is used more extensively, it will be able to manage the rising volumes of CO2 emissions that will be captured from different industries. For CCS to realize its full potential, scalability is essential. CCS is a key participant in the fight against climate change because it can safely and permanently store ever-increasing volumes of CO2 underground, making it a more practical and scalable approach for reaching aggressive emissions reduction targets.

Through cost optimization, geological storage has a twofold advantage for the growth of the CCS business. First off, compared to other, more constrained storage choices, the enormous capacity of these formations enables effective storage, possibly lowering storage costs per unit of CO2. Second, CO2 injection and transportation can be done with already-existing infrastructure from the oil and gas sector. Depleted oil and gas reservoirs can be used as storage facilities, and natural gas pipelines can be modified to carry CO2. The initial expenditures involved in constructing brand-new storage facilities are greatly decreased by utilizing this current infrastructure. This cost optimization makes CCS a more financially attractive proposition for a wider range of industries, particularly those that were previously priced out due to high storage costs. By reducing the financial barrier to entry, geological storage can play a key role in expanding the CCS market and making the technology a more accessible tool for combating climate change.

Competitive Landscape

The Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) market is a developing field with a mix of established energy companies and innovative startups vying for position. Incumbent firms in the oil and gas sector leverage their experience in handling large-scale projects, while new entrants bring fresh technology solutions. This dynamic creates competition in capture methods (pre-combustion, post-combustion, oxyfuel), transportation options (pipelines, ships), and storage solutions (geological formations). The coming years will likely see consolidation and strategic partnerships as the market matures.

Some of the prominent players operating in the carbon capture and storage market include:

ExxonMobil Corporation

Schlumberger Limited

Chevron Corporation

Shell plc

National Oil Corporation

Baker Hughes Company

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.

Fluor Corporation

SaskPower

China National Petroleum Corporatio

In May 2024, The International Energy Agency (IEA) released an update on Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) deployment. The report highlights significant growth, with announced capture capacity for 2030 increasing by 35% and storage capacity by 70% in 2023 compared to the previous year. This indicates an acceleration in CCS projects around the world.

In April 2024, A report by India-based Straits Research projects the global carbon capture and storage (CCS) market to reach $5.26 billion by 2032. This reflects a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.5%, indicating a growing market for CCS technologies.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Introduction

• Market Definition
• Market Segmentation
• Research Methodology

2. Executive Summary

• Key Findings
• Market Overview
• Market Highlights

3. Market Overview

• Market Size and Growth Potential
• Market Trends
• Market Drivers
• Market Restraints
• Market Opportunities
• Porter's Five Forces Analysis

4. Carbon Capture and Storage Market, By Application

• Power Generation
• Oil and Gas Processing
• Industrial Manufacturing
• Direct Air Capture

5. Carbon Capture and Storage Market, By Storage Method

• Geological Storage
• Ocean Storage
• Mineralization

6. Carbon Capture and Storage Market, By End User Industry

• Energy Sector
• Oil and Gas Industry
• Industrial Sector
• Other Sectors

7. Regional Analysis

• North America
• United States
• Canada
• Mexico
• Europe
• United Kingdom
• Germany
• France
• Italy
• Asia-Pacific
• China
• Japan
• India
• Australia
• Latin America
• Brazil
• Argentina
• Chile
• Middle East and Africa
• South Africa
• Saudi Arabia
• UAE

8. Market Dynamics

• Market Drivers
• Market Restraints
• Market Opportunities
• Impact of COVID-19 on the Market

9. Competitive Landscape

• Key Players
• Market Share Analysis

10. Company Profiles

• ExxonMobil Corporation (USA)
• Schlumberger Limited (USA)
• Chevron Corporation (USA)
• Shell plc (UK/Netherlands)
• National Oil Corporation (UAE)
• Baker Hughes Company (USA)
• Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (Japan)
• Fluor Corporation (USA)
• SaskPower (Canada)
• China National Petroleum Corporation (China)

11. Market Outlook and Opportunities

• Emerging Technologies
• Future Market Trends
• Investment Opportunities

12. Appendix

• List of Abbreviations
• Sources and References