封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1463549

全球注塑模内标市场 - 2024-2031

Global Injection In-Mold Labels Market - 2024-2031

出版日期: | 出版商: DataM Intelligence | 英文 201 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

简介目录

概述

全球注塑模内标籤市场将于 2023 年达到 14 亿美元,预计到 2031 年将达到 20 亿美元,2024-2031 年预测期间复合CAGR为 5.2%。

随着人们对永续发展和环境责任的日益关注,对环保包装解决方案(例如注塑模内标籤)的需求越来越大。采用可回收材料生产的 IML 具有环保印刷选项,可促进永续性并吸引註重环保的消费者和企业。注塑模内标籤可以整合密封、穿孔或全像元素等防篡改功能,为消费者提供产品完整性和安全性的保证。

当人们担心商品被篡改和假冒时,製药和食品等行业对具有安全功能的 IML 的需求也会增加。这些标籤将重要的产品资讯、监管符号和防篡改成分融入包装容器中,帮助品牌所有者满足监管标准。美国于 2004 年通过《食品过敏标籤和消费者保护法》,并于 1906 年通过《食品药物法》

到 2023 年,北美预计将成为第二主导地区,约占全球注塑模内标籤市场的 25%。北美消费者偏好包装精美的优质产品。注塑模内标籤提供卓越的印刷品质、充满活力的图形和客製化选项,使其成为寻求差异化产品并在商店货架上创造强烈视觉衝击力的品牌的理想选择。

动力学

对高品质图形和品牌的偏好

注塑模内标籤在列印品质、彩色影像和可自订选项方面超出了标准标籤流程。产生引人注目的设计、徽标和品牌组件的能力增加了品牌所有者对 IML 的需求,希望使自己的产品脱颖而出并吸引客户注意力。随着客户偏好转向便利性和品牌商品,生产商寻求 IML 等创意包装解决方案,以改善产品展示和货架吸引力。

Cosmo Films 于2019 年9 月推出了极其抗撕裂的合成纸、用于可重新定位和可移除标籤应用的聚丙烯薄膜、哑光涂层压敏标籤纸薄膜、透明模内标籤薄膜、高速WAL 薄膜和珠光金属化WAL 薄膜。

科技不断进步

印刷技术、材料科学和生产方法的不断改进提高了注塑标籤的品质、效率和多功能性。由于数位印刷、图形和自动化等创新,製造商现在可以生产具有更高印刷品质、更多客製化可能性和更短週转时间的 IML。

Tadbik 于 2019 年 3 月宣布推出 RAIN RFID 模内标籤。 M-Line 机器人由位于科罗拉多州柯林斯堡的 Muller Printing Technology Colorado 于 2020 年 3 月发布。

高投资和复杂性

采用 IML 技术需要对专用设备、模具和基础设施进行大量初始投资。对于中小型组织(SME)或财力较弱的企业来说,初始投资成本是进入射出成型模内标籤市场的障碍。设计和准备注塑标籤的图稿可能既困难又耗时。

实现理想的套准、色彩一致性和图形对齐需要专门的知识和技能,这给品牌所有者和包装设计师带来了问题。射出成型模内贴标并不适用于所有容器类型、几何形状或材质。某些包装样式或设计可能会为射出成型模内标籤应用带来障碍,限制市场的适用性和特定产业或产品类别的潜在成长。

目录

目录

第 1 章:方法与范围

  • 研究方法论
  • 报告的研究目的和范围

第 2 章:定义与概述

第 3 章:执行摘要

  • 按材料分类的片段
  • 列印技术片段
  • 按应用程式片段
  • 按地区分類的片段

第 4 章:动力学

  • 影响因素
    • 司机
      • 对高品质图形和品牌的偏好
      • 科技不断进步
    • 限制
      • 高投资和复杂性
    • 机会
    • 影响分析

第 5 章:产业分析

  • 波特五力分析
  • 供应链分析
  • 定价分析
  • 监管分析
  • 俄乌战争影响分析
  • DMI 意见

第 6 章:COVID-19 分析

  • COVID-19 分析
    • 新冠疫情爆发前的情景
    • 新冠疫情期间的情景
    • 新冠疫情后的情景
  • COVID-19 期间的定价动态
  • 供需谱
  • 疫情期间政府与市场相关的倡议
  • 製造商策略倡议
  • 结论

第 7 章:按材料

  • 聚丙烯
  • 聚乙烯
  • 聚氯乙烯 (PVC)
  • ABS树脂
  • 其他的

第 8 章:透过印刷技术

  • 柔版印刷
  • 胶印
  • 其他的

第 9 章:按申请

  • 食品和饮料
  • 化学品
  • 居家及个人护理
  • 消费品
  • 其他的

第 10 章:按地区

  • 北美洲
    • 我们
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 欧洲
    • 德国
    • 英国
    • 法国
    • 义大利
    • 俄罗斯
    • 欧洲其他地区
  • 南美洲
    • 巴西
    • 阿根廷
    • 南美洲其他地区
  • 亚太
    • 中国
    • 印度
    • 日本
    • 澳洲
    • 亚太其他地区
  • 中东和非洲

第 11 章:竞争格局

  • 竞争场景
  • 市场定位/份额分析
  • 併购分析

第 12 章:公司简介

  • CCL Industries, Inc.
    • 公司简介
    • 产品组合和描述
    • 财务概览
    • 主要进展
  • Constantia Flexibles Group GmbH
  • Coveris Holdings SA
  • Huhtamaki Group
  • Cenveo Inc.
  • Hammer Packaging
  • Fuji Seal International Inc.
  • Avery Dennison Corporation
  • Innovia Films Ltd.
  • Inland

第 13 章:附录

简介目录
Product Code: PAC8349

Overview

Global Injection In-Mold Labels Market reached US$ 1.4 billion in 2023 and is expected to reach US$ 2.0 billion by 2031, growing with a CAGR of 5.2% during the forecast period 2024-2031.

With a growing focus on sustainability and environmental responsibility, there is a greater need for eco-friendly packaging solutions such as injection in-mold labels. IMLs produced from recyclable materials with eco-friendly printing options promote sustainability and attract environmentally concerned consumers and businesses. Injection in-mold labels can integrate tamper-evident features like seals, perforations or holographic elements, giving consumers with assurances of product integrity and safety.

When concerns about tampering with goods and counterfeiting occurs, so does the demand for IMLs with security features in industries including pharmaceuticals and food. The labels assist brand owners in meeting regulatory standards by incorporating essential product information, regulatory symbols and tamper-evident components into packing containers. The Food Allergy Labeling and Consumer Protection Act was passed in 2004, while the Food and Drugs Act of 1906 was passed in U.S.

In 2023, North America is expected to be the second-dominant region with about 25% of the global injection in-mold labels market. Consumers in North America exhibit a preference for premium-quality products with attractive packaging. Injection in-mold labels offer superior printing quality, vibrant graphics and customization options, making them an ideal choice for brands seeking to differentiate their products and create a strong visual impact on store shelves.

Dynamics

Preference for High-Quality Graphics and Branding

Injection in-mold labels exceed standard labeling processes in terms of printing quality, colorful images and customizable options. The capacity to generate eye-catching designs, logos and branding components increases demand for IMLs from brand owners looking to differentiate their products and capture customer attention. As customer preferences shift towards convenience and branded items, producers seek creative packaging solutions such as IML to improve product presentation and shelf appeal.

Cosmo Films launched extremely tear-resistant synthetic papers, polypropylene films for repositionable and removable label applications, matte coated pressure-sensitive label stock films, transparent in-mold label film, high-speed WAL film and pearlized metalized WAL film in September 2019. Events like these show that the injection in-mold label market will develop during the forecast period.

Growing Advancements in Technology

Continuous improvements in printing technology, materials science and production methods improve the quality, efficiency and versatility of injection-molded labels. Manufacturers may now generate IMLs with higher print quality, more customization possibilities and shorter turnaround times because to innovations like digital printing, graphics and automation.

Tadbik announced the launch of the RAIN RFID In-Mold Label in March 2019. The label has a specially designed antenna with an Impinj Monza R6-P chip, making it appropriate for crates, the food and beverage industry and automobile makers. The M-Line robot was released in March 2020 by Muller Printing Technology Colorado, based in Fort Collins, CO. The integrated robotic and automation system considerably improves the versatility and adaptability for the production of injection-molded packaging.

High Investments and Complexity

Adopting IML technology necessitates a considerable initial investment in specialized equipment, molds and infrastructure. For small and medium-sized organizations (SMEs) or businesses with low financial resources, the initial investment cost acts as a barrier to entering the injection in-mold labels market. Designing and preparing artwork for injection-mold labels can be difficult and time-consuming.

Achieving ideal registration, color consistency and graphics alignment necessitates specialized knowledge and skill, which presents a problem for brand owners and packaging designers. Injection in-mold labeling could not be appropriate for all container types, geometries or materials. Certain packaging styles or designs may provide hurdles for injection in-mold labels application, restricting the market's applicability and potential growth in specific industries or product categories.

Segment Analysis

The global injection in-mold labels market is segmented based on material, printing technology, application and region.

Rising Asthetic Value of Packging in Food & Beverage Sector

Food & beverages are expected to be the dominant segment with over 1/4th of the market during the forecast period 2024-2031. Owing to the importance of packaging aesthetics in the food & beverage industry, in-mold labeling is expected to be widely adopted. Packaging prolongs the shelf life of products and attracts potential purchasers. The increased barrier makes in-mold labeling advantageous for the food and beverage industries, improving the shelf life of packaged commodities.

Muller Printing Technology, a manufacturer of molds and automation solutions for thin wall packaging, stated in September 2022 that their in-mold labelling automation technology would be used in sustainable injection molding packaging. The technology is introduced to produce a 100% monomaterial container composed of totally recyclable polypropylene, together with a wrap-around and bottom polypropylene-based label.

Geographical Penetration

Growing Technology Advancements in Asia-Pacific

Asia-Pacific is expected to be the dominant region in the global injection in-mold labels market covering about 25% of the market. Advances in printing technology, materials science and manufacturing methods improve the efficiency, quality and versatility of injection-mold labels in Asia-Pacific. Digital printing, high-definition graphics and automation all contribute to market growth by allowing for greater customization, cost-effectiveness and shorter production cycles.

In February 2018, Manjushree Technopack expected an increase in demand for in-mold labels and collaborated with vendors to develop label applicators for efficient label application. Furthermore, LabelShimbun predicts that shrink sleeves and in-mold labels will witness greater label usage in October 2019 than pressure-sensitive labels. Regional enterprises use in-mold labeling technologies, which are projected to boost market growth in the region.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players in the market include CCL Industries, Inc., Constantia Flexibles Group GmbH, Coveris Holdings S.A., Huhtamaki Group, Cenveo Inc., Hammer Packaging, Fuji Seal International Inc., Avery Dennison Corporation, Innovia Films Ltd. and Inland.

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

Many manufacturing facilities experienced output delays or temporary shutdowns as a result of government-imposed lockdowns, social distancing measures and labor shortages. The interruptions in production capacity caused delays in order fulfillment, affecting the supply of injection in-mold labels goods to end customers. Changes in consumer behavior during the pandemic, including as increased demand for critical items and movements to internet purchasing, altered the demand for products packed with injection in-mold labels.

While certain industries had an increase in demand, others, like automotive and non-essential consumer items, saw a decrease, hurting total demand for injection in-mold labels. The epidemic has spurred tendencies toward digitalization and automation in industrial processes, such as injection in-mold labeling. Manufacturers engaged in technologies like digital printing, robotics and remote monitoring to improve productivity, save costs and meet changing market expectations.

Russia-Ukraine War Impact

Russia and Ukraine are both major producers of raw materials needed in the manufacture of injection in-mold labels, like polymers and resin. Any disruptions in the availability of these raw materials caused by the conflict, such as trade restrictions, transportation bottlenecks or manufacturing halts, could result in shortages and higher pricing for injection in-mold labels manufacturers globally.

The crisis has an impact on companies that rely significantly on injection in-mold labels, including food and beverage, cosmetics, medicines and consumer goods. Disruptions in the supply chain may cause production delays, shortages or increased costs for packaging materials, affecting the availability and pricing of products packaged using injection in-mold labels.

By Material

  • Polypropylene
  • Polyethylene
  • Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC)
  • ABS Resins
  • Others

By Printing Technology

  • Flexographic Printing
  • Offset Printing
  • Others

By Application

  • Food & Beverages
  • Chemicals
  • Home & Personal Care
  • Consumer Goods
  • Others

By Region

  • North America
    • U.S.
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • France
    • Italy
    • Russia
    • Rest of Europe
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East and Africa

Key Developments

  • In 2024, Mold-Tek Packaging Limited made an investment in a Durst RSCi 510mm press with priming and varnishing stations to transform digital printing for in-mold labels.
  • In 2023, SABIC teamed up with three in-mold labeling experts to show the use of certified sustainable polypropylene resins in mono-PP thin-wall container packaging without sacrificing quality, processability, safety or convenience. The single-step IML method decorates the part inside the injection mold, making the label an integrated part of the packaging.
  • In 2023, Multi-Color Corporation, one of the world's major label producers, is happy to announce the acquisition of Korsini, a leading in-mold label solutions provider based in Turkey.

Why Purchase the Report?

  • To visualize the global injection in-mold labels market segmentation based on material, printing technology, application and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
  • Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
  • Excel data sheet with numerous data points of injection in-mold labels market-level with all segments.
  • PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
  • Product mapping available as excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global injection in-mold labels market report would provide approximately 62 tables, 56 figures and 201 pages.

Target Audience 2024

  • Manufacturers/ Buyers
  • Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
  • Research Professionals
  • Emerging Companies

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

1.Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1.Research Methodology
  • 1.2.Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2.Definition and Overview

3.Executive Summary

  • 3.1.Snippet by Material
  • 3.2.Snippet by Printing Technology
  • 3.3.Snippet by Application
  • 3.4.Snippet by Region

4.Dynamics

  • 4.1.Impacting Factors
    • 4.1.1.Drivers
      • 4.1.1.1.Preference for High-Quality Graphics and Branding
      • 4.1.1.2.Growing Advancements in Technology
    • 4.1.2.Restraints
      • 4.1.2.1.High Investments and Complexity
    • 4.1.3.Opportunity
    • 4.1.4.Impact Analysis

5.Industry Analysis

  • 5.1.Porter's Five Force Analysis
  • 5.2.Supply Chain Analysis
  • 5.3.Pricing Analysis
  • 5.4.Regulatory Analysis
  • 5.5.Russia-Ukraine War Impact Analysis
  • 5.6.DMI Opinion

6.COVID-19 Analysis

  • 6.1.Analysis of COVID-19
    • 6.1.1.Scenario Before COVID
    • 6.1.2.Scenario During COVID
    • 6.1.3.Scenario Post COVID
  • 6.2.Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
  • 6.3.Demand-Supply Spectrum
  • 6.4.Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
  • 6.5.Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
  • 6.6.Conclusion

7.By Material

  • 7.1.Introduction
    • 7.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Material
    • 7.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Material
  • 7.2.Polypropylene*
    • 7.2.1.Introduction
    • 7.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 7.3.Polyethylene
  • 7.4.Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC)
  • 7.5.ABS Resins
  • 7.6.Others

8.By Printing Technology

  • 8.1.Introduction
    • 8.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Printing Technology
    • 8.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Printing Technology
  • 8.2.Flexographic Printing*
    • 8.2.1.Introduction
    • 8.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 8.3.Offset Printing
  • 8.4.Others

9.By Application

  • 9.1.Introduction
    • 9.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 9.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Application
  • 9.2.Food & Beverages*
    • 9.2.1.Introduction
    • 9.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 9.3.Chemicals
  • 9.4.Home & Personal Care
  • 9.5.Consumer Goods
  • 9.6.Others

10.By Region

  • 10.1.Introduction
    • 10.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
    • 10.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
  • 10.2.North America
    • 10.2.1.Introduction
    • 10.2.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.2.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Material
    • 10.2.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Printing Technology
    • 10.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 10.2.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.2.6.1.U.S.
      • 10.2.6.2.Canada
      • 10.2.6.3.Mexico
  • 10.3.Europe
    • 10.3.1.Introduction
    • 10.3.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.3.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Material
    • 10.3.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Printing Technology
    • 10.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 10.3.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.3.6.1.Germany
      • 10.3.6.2.UK
      • 10.3.6.3.France
      • 10.3.6.4.Italy
      • 10.3.6.5.Russia
      • 10.3.6.6.Rest of Europe
  • 10.4.South America
    • 10.4.1.Introduction
    • 10.4.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.4.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Material
    • 10.4.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Printing Technology
    • 10.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 10.4.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.4.6.1.Brazil
      • 10.4.6.2.Argentina
      • 10.4.6.3.Rest of South America
  • 10.5.Asia-Pacific
    • 10.5.1.Introduction
    • 10.5.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.5.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Material
    • 10.5.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Printing Technology
    • 10.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
    • 10.5.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.5.6.1.China
      • 10.5.6.2.India
      • 10.5.6.3.Japan
      • 10.5.6.4.Australia
      • 10.5.6.5.Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 10.6.Middle East and Africa
    • 10.6.1.Introduction
    • 10.6.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.6.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Material
    • 10.6.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Printing Technology
    • 10.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application

11.Competitive Landscape

  • 11.1.Competitive Scenario
  • 11.2.Market Positioning/Share Analysis
  • 11.3.Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

12.Company Profiles

  • 12.1.CCL Industries, Inc.*
    • 12.1.1.Company Overview
    • 12.1.2.Product Portfolio and Description
    • 12.1.3.Financial Overview
    • 12.1.4.Key Developments
  • 12.2.Constantia Flexibles Group GmbH
  • 12.3.Coveris Holdings S.A.
  • 12.4.Huhtamaki Group
  • 12.5.Cenveo Inc.
  • 12.6.Hammer Packaging
  • 12.7.Fuji Seal International Inc.
  • 12.8.Avery Dennison Corporation
  • 12.9.Innovia Films Ltd.
  • 12.10.Inland

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

13.Appendix

  • 13.1.About Us and Services
  • 13.2.Contact Us