首页 > 市场调查报告书 > 能源/环境

CO2 降低

市场调查报告书

商品编码

1654701

全球碳农业市场 - 2025 至 2032 年

Global Carbon Farming Market - 2025-2032

出版日期: 2025年02月13日 | 出版商:

DataM Intelligence | 英文 201 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

简介目录

2024 年全球碳农业市场规模达 1.1336 亿美元，预计到 2032 年将达到 3,300.1 亿美元，2025-2032 年预测期内的复合年增长率为 14.29%。

由于全球人口的增长和相应的食品消费的激增，碳农业市场变得越来越重要，这大大增加了与农业实践相关的碳足迹。目前，农业产出约占全球温室气体排放量的11%，其中畜牧业为主要来源。然而，农业有能力从问题的导致者转变为解决方案的重要组成部分。

碳农业计画强调利用永续的做法来捕获碳，包括土壤管理、农林业和强化牲畜和作物系统。这个新兴市场引起了农民、商业部门和政府的极大关注，凸显了其在应对气候变迁方面的重要性。

巴斯夫共同创立欧洲碳+农业联盟，彰显了以农民为中心的策略，加速向永续农业转型。这些努力与包括欧盟绿色协议在内的整体碳中和目标相呼应。将碳封存纳入农业框架是减少环境影响和促进粮食生产系统长期永续性的可行方法。

动力学

驱动因素 1 – 监管架构与政府政策

世界各国政府正采取财政诱因、补贴和碳信用等措施，鼓励农民采用碳封存方法。澳洲减排基金（ERF）激励农业者透过永续技术减少温室气体排放。将碳捕获于土壤或植物中的措施可以产生碳信用额，这些碳信用额可以进行交易以获取经济收益。这导致了碳农业实践的广泛采用，特别是在农业领域，证明了永续农业的经济可行性。

在欧洲，计划于 2023 年 3 月 22 日实施的《绿色声明指令》等监管进步增强了市场稳健性。该指令与欧洲绿色协议一致，旨在增强消费者对环境声明的信心并鼓励永续行为。强制要求在环境声明中提供证据和透明度，迫使组织采用更永续和更负责任的方法，从而间接促进碳农业的进步。

这些支持性立法框架不仅建立了财政激励机制，也增强了人们的意识和信心，推动碳农业作为应对气候变迁和农业永续性的重要措施。

驱动因素 2 – 碳补偿需求

企业、政府实体和寻求实现碳中和或减少碳足迹的人们对于碳补偿的需求日益增加。碳补偿透过平衡无法直接消除的温室气体排放，已成为缓和气候变迁的国际措施中的重要机制。这种需求受到多种变数的影响，例如企业永续发展目标、立法要求以及消费者对生态负责产品和服务的倾向。

人们对气候变迁和监管限制的认识不断增强，正在推动碳信用市场的发展。这为农民提供了一个透过永续土地管理实践封存碳来获取收入的市场机会。许多公司承诺实现碳中和，并准备投资碳补偿。这对从事碳农业的农民来说是一个巨大的市场机会。

约束：测量和验证挑战

碳农业旨在透过农业方法封存大气中的二氧化碳并将其保留在土壤和植被中。然而，由于土壤碳动态的复杂性，受各种土壤类型、气候条件和农业方法的影响，量化和验证碳封存会遇到困难。

这种不可预测性阻碍了建立一致的评估方法，从而增加了费用和工作量。验证方法的精确度、可扩展性和费用很大程度上影响碳农业计画的有效性。高昂的费用和多变的标准可能会阻碍农民参与和买家投资碳信用。

位于西雅图的新创公司 Nori 就反映了这些问题。他们的市场将农民与碳补偿购买者联繫起来，但在准确评估碳去除方面遇到困难。由于土壤的多变性，Nori 在土壤采样和建模方面面临挑战。与科学专家的合作增强了他们的方法；但儘管如此，这个过程依然昂贵且耗时。区块链技术等创新提高了透明度，而 Nori 对标准化标准的倡导则强调了全行业统一的必要性，以减少复杂性并增强对碳农业计划的信任。

The carbon farming market is becoming more important due to the growing global population and a corresponding surge in food consumption, which has significantly increased the carbon footprint associated with agricultural practices. Agricultural output presently accounts for roughly 11% of global greenhouse gas emissions, with the livestock industry as the predominant source. Nevertheless, agriculture possesses the capacity to shift from contributing to the issue to serving as a crucial component of the solution.

Carbon farming programs emphasize the utilization of sustainable practices, including soil management, agroforestry and enhanced livestock and crop systems, to trap carbon. This nascent market has attracted significant attention from farmers, the commercial sector and governments, highlighting its importance in addressing climate change.

BASF's co-founding of the European Carbon+ Farming Coalition highlights a farmer-centric strategy to expedite the shift towards sustainable agriculture. These efforts correspond with overarching carbon neutrality objectives, including the European Union's Green Deal. Integrating carbon sequestration into agricultural frameworks offers a viable approach to reduce environmental impacts and promote long-term sustainability in food production systems.

Dynamics

Driver 1 - Regulatory frameworks and government policies

Governments worldwide are enacting measures including financial incentives, subsidies and carbon credits to encourage farmers to use carbon sequestration practices. Australia's Emissions Reduction Fund (ERF) incentivizes agriculturalists to diminish greenhouse gas emissions via sustainable techniques. Initiatives that trap carbon in soil or plants can generate carbon credits, which are tradable for financial gain. This has resulted in substantial adoption of carbon farming practices, especially in the agriculture sector, demonstrating the economic feasibility of sustainable farming.

In Europe, regulation advancements like the Green Claims Directive, planned on March 22, 2023, enhance market robustness. The directive is consistent with the European Green Deal, seeking to bolster consumer confidence in environmental assertions and encourage sustainable behavior. Mandating proof and transparency in environmental claims compels organizations to adopt more sustainable and accountable methods, hence indirectly promoting the advancement of carbon farming.

These supportive legislative frameworks not only establish financial incentives but also augment awareness and confidence, promoting carbon farming as an essential response to climate change and agricultural sustainability.

Driver 2 - Carbon offsetting demand

Increasing demand for carbon offsets from corporations, governmental entities and people seeking to attain carbon neutrality or diminish their carbon footprint. Carbon offsets have emerged as an essential mechanism in international initiatives to alleviate climate change by counterbalancing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that cannot be directly eliminated. This demand is influenced by multiple variables, such as corporate sustainability objectives, legislative mandates and consumer inclinations towards ecologically responsible products and services.

The growing awareness of climate change and regulatory restrictions are propelling the market for carbon credits. This presents a market opportunity for farmers to gain income by sequestering carbon via sustainable land management practices. Numerous corporations are pledging to achieve carbon neutrality and are prepared to invest in carbon offsets. This represents a substantial market opportunity for farmers engaged in carbon farming efforts.

Restraint: Measurement and verification challenges

Carbon farming seeks to sequester atmospheric CO2 and retain it in soil and vegetation via agricultural methods. Nonetheless, quantifying and validating carbon sequestration encounters difficulties owing to the intricacies of soil carbon dynamics, which are affected by various soil types, climatic conditions and agricultural methods.

This unpredictability hinders the establishment of consistent assessment methodologies, hence escalating expenses and efforts. The precision, scalability and expense of verification methods strongly influence the efficacy of carbon farming initiatives. Elevated expenses and variable criteria may deter farmers from engaging and buyers from investing in carbon credits.

Nori, a startup located in Seattle, illustrates these problems. Their marketplace links farmers with carbon offset purchasers but encounters difficulties in precisely assessing carbon removal. Nori faced challenges in soil sampling and modeling because of soil variability. Engaging with scientific specialists enhanced their approaches; nonetheless, the process was expensive and time-consuming. Innovations like as blockchain technology improved transparency, while Nori's advocacy for standardized standards underscored the necessity for industry-wide uniformity to diminish complexity and foster trust in carbon farming initiatives.

Segment Analysis

The global carbon farming market is segmented based on project type, practice type, end-user and region.

Silvopasture works as catalyst for carbon sequestration and agricultural sustainability

Silvopasture, an integrated agroforestry approach that amalgamates trees, fodder plants and cattle on the same plot of land, is increasingly recognized for its capacity to absorb carbon, augment soil health and elevate farm output. This method is notably important in the carbon farming sector, providing a comprehensive strategy for climate mitigation and agricultural sustainability.

Research demonstrates that silvopasture systems can store between 1.1 and 4.2 tons of CO2 per hectare each year, contingent upon tree species, climate and management approaches, rendering it a compelling choice for farmers aiming to produce carbon credits.

In the southeastern US, where conventional cattle ranching has encountered soil degradation, water scarcity and diminishing profitability, silvopasture has arisen as a sustainable alternative. Farmers have effectively cultivated fast-growing tree species, such as loblolly pine, in conjunction with grazing grasses and cattle, maximizing both environmental and economic advantages.

Integrated crop-livestock systems (ICLS) are anticipated to experience substantial expansion in the carbon farming sector. These systems integrate plant and animal elements to improve agroecosystem resilience and tackle global food security issues. ICLS can enhance agricultural output, improve nutritional results and promote environmental sustainability, particularly for rural and low-income households, providing enduring advantages for food and nutritional security.

Geographical Penetration

Ambitious climate goals and supportive policies in Europe

The carbon farming industry in Europe is swiftly growing, propelled by the EU's ambitious climate objectives and favorable legislation. Due to heightened awareness and incentives, the market is poised for substantial growth in the forthcoming years. The European Union has implemented various initiatives to promote carbon farming, including the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), Horizon Europe and the LIFE program. These initiatives offer financial incentives and technical assistance to farmers and land managers for the adoption of carbon farming practices.

In April 2024, the European Parliament ratified the Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming (CRCF) Regulation, creating the inaugural EU-wide voluntary framework for certifying carbon removals, carbon farming and carbon storage in products throughout Europe. The CRCF Regulation will promote investment in novel carbon removal technologies and sustainable carbon farming solutions by establishing EU quality criteria and monitoring and reporting methods, while simultaneously addressing greenwashing.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players in the market include Vayda, Terramera Inc, Indigo Ag, Nori, Soil Capital, Agoro Carbon Alliance, Carbon Sequestration Inc., Regen Network, Agreena and Rabo Carbon Bank.

By Project Type

Agroforestry
Biochar
Silvopasture
Soil Carbon Sequestration
Afforestation/ Reforestation

By Practice Type

Conservation Tillage
Cover Cropping
Crop Rotation
Integrated Crop-livestock Systems

By End-user

Farmers & Ranchers
Corporations
Government Agencies
Non-profit Organizations

By Region

North America
South America
Europe
Asia-Pacific
Middle East and Africa

Key Developments

In June 2024, Nori introduces an unprecedented quantity of soil carbon removal credits to the marketplace from the Bayer Carbon Program in U.S. Nori announced the release of more than 125,000 regeneration tonnes from the Bayer Carbon Program in U.S. marketplace, representing the greatest single issuance of credits in the company's history. The credits signify an unparalleled augmentation of Nori's carbon removal supply and contribute substantially to the soil organic carbon sector.
In April 2024, Nori collaborates with Perennial to enhance its carbon credit issuance program and enable new functionalities. Nori, a prominent issuer, registry and market for carbon removal credits, has selected Perennial, a firm specializing in soil carbon standards, tools and technology, to facilitate the development and growth of its soil organic carbon credit issuance program.

Why Purchase the Report?

To visualize the global carbon farming market segmentation based on project type, practice type, end-user and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
Excel data sheet with numerous data points of the carbon farming market with all segments.
PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
Product mapping available as excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global carbon farming market report would provide approximately 62 tables, 56 figures and 201 pages.

Target Audience 2025

Manufacturers/ Buyers
Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
Research Professionals
Emerging Companies

1. Methodology and Scope

1.1. Research Methodology
1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

3.1. Snippet by Project Type
3.2. Snippet by Practice Type
3.3. Snippet by End-user
3.4. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

4.1. Impacting Factors
- 4.1.1. Drivers
  - 4.1.1.1. Regulatory frameworks and government policies
  - 4.1.1.2. Carbon offsetting demand
- 4.1.2. Restraints
  - 4.1.2.1. Measurement and verification challenges
- 4.1.3. Opportunity
- 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
5.3. Pricing Analysis
5.4. Regulatory Analysis
5.5. DMI Opinion

6. By Project Type

6.1. Introduction
- 6.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Project Type
- 6.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Project Type
6.2. Agroforestry*
- 6.2.1. Introduction
- 6.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
6.3. Biochar
6.4. Silvopasture
6.5. Soil Carbon Sequestration
6.6. Afforestation/ Reforestation

7. By Practice Type

7.1. Introduction
- 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Practice Type
- 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Practice Type
7.2. Conservation Tillage*
- 7.2.1. Introduction
- 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
7.3. Cover Cropping
7.4. Crop Rotation
7.5. Integrated Crop-livestock Systems

8. By End-user

8.1. Introduction
- 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user
- 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By End-user
8.2. Farmers & Ranchers*
- 8.2.1. Introduction
- 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
8.3. Corporations
8.4. Government Agencies
8.5. Non-profit Organizations

9. By Region

9.1. Introduction
- 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
- 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
9.2. North America
- 9.2.1. Introduction
- 9.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 9.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Project Type
- 9.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Practice Type
- 9.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user
- 9.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 9.2.6.1. US
  - 9.2.6.2. Canada
  - 9.2.6.3. Mexico
9.3. Europe
- 9.3.1. Introduction
- 9.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 9.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Project Type
- 9.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Practice Type
- 9.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user
- 9.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 9.3.6.1. Germany
  - 9.3.6.2. UK
  - 9.3.6.3. France
  - 9.3.6.4. Italy
  - 9.3.6.5. Spain
  - 9.3.6.6. Rest of Europe
9.4. South America
- 9.4.1. Introduction
- 9.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 9.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Project Type
- 9.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Practice Type
- 9.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user
- 9.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 9.4.6.1. Brazil
  - 9.4.6.2. Argentina
  - 9.4.6.3. Rest of South America
9.5. Asia-Pacific
- 9.5.1. Introduction
- 9.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 9.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Project Type
- 9.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Practice Type
- 9.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user
- 9.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 9.5.6.1. China
  - 9.5.6.2. India
  - 9.5.6.3. Japan
  - 9.5.6.4. Australia
  - 9.5.6.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
9.6. Middle East and Africa
- 9.6.1. Introduction
- 9.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 9.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Project Type
- 9.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Practice Type
- 9.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user

10. Competitive Landscape

10.1. Competitive Scenario
10.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
10.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

11. Company Profiles

11.1. Vayda*
- 11.1.1. Company Overview
- 11.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
- 11.1.3. Financial Overview
- 11.1.4. Key Developments
11.2. Terramera Inc
11.3. Indigo Ag
11.4. Nori
11.5. Soil Capital
11.6. Agoro Carbon Alliance
11.7. Carbon Sequestration Inc.
11.8. Regen Network
11.9. Agreena
11.10. Rabo Carbon Bank

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE