封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1701289

美国整形外科手术规划软体市场规模、份额、趋势分析报告(按软体产品、软体类型、最终用途、细分市场预测,2025 年至 2030 年)

U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Software Delivery (Cloud Based, On Premise), By Software Type (Pre-Operative, Post Operative), By End-use, And Segment Forecasts, 2025 - 2030

出版日期: | 出版商: Grand View Research | 英文 150 Pages | 商品交期: 2-10个工作天内

价格

美国整形外科手术规划软体市场成长与趋势:

根据 Grand View Research, Inc. 的最新研究,美国整形外科手术计画软体市场规模预计到 2030 年将达到 3,487 万美元,2025 年至 2030 年期间的复合年增长率为 6.05%。

医院和诊所越来越多地采用整形外科手术规划软体来实现高效的工作流程管理,从而推动市场成长。此外,行业技术进步和精度、效率的创新正在推动市场成长。例如,2021 年 6 月,Radlink, Inc. 推出了 Radlink3D,这是一款术中软体,旨在评估髋臼杯的位置并解决全髋关节置换术期间的骨盆倾斜和脊椎骨盆活动性。这项创新技术采用 2D-3D抗蚀剂进行术前规划。

随着世界人口老化,与老龄化相关的整形外科疾病(包括骨关节炎、退化性关节病变、骨折和骨质疏鬆症)的盛行率正在显着增加。根据世界卫生组织报告,到2030年,全球六分之一的人口将超过60岁。届时,60岁及以上人口比例将从2020年的10亿增加到14亿。 2050年,全球60岁以上人口将翻倍,达到21亿人。由于骨骼和关节随着时间的推移而自然退化,这一层特别容易受到整形外科疾病的影响,导致活动能力和肌肉质量的丧失。因此,预计这些因素将在预测期内推动市场成长。

此外,微创手术因其切口小、组织创伤小、恢復时间快等优点,在整形外科中受到关注。常见的手术包括关节镜手术、内视镜脊椎手术和微创关节关节重建。这些程序非常复杂,需要仔细的术前和术后规划。整形外科手术规划软体透过提供详细的 3D 视觉化、即时模拟和精确测量发挥着至关重要的作用。这项技术可帮助外科医生有效地导航复杂的解剖结构,有助于加速市场成长。

此外,市场参与者正在选择各种策略性倡议,预计将促进国内市场的成长。美敦力推出了一款专为整形外科手术设计的新型人工智慧术前规划工具,以满足该领域对先进技术日益增长的需求。该计划反映了将人工智慧融入手术计划过程以提高准确性和治疗效果的更广泛趋势。此外,2024 年 6 月,Zimmer Biomet 与一家医疗软体供应商建立策略伙伴关係,开发由人工智慧驱动的术前规划工具,旨在提高整形外科手术的准确性。此类合作凸显了领先公司对创新和加强手术规划技术的承诺。

美国整形外科手术规划软体市场报告重点

  • 根据软体交付,云端基础的部分在 2024 年占据了最大的收益占有率。这是由于技术不断进步以及医疗机构缺乏操作和管理该软体的熟练专业人员。
  • 根据软体类型,就 2024 年的收入份额而言,术前部分占据了市场主导地位。这是由于人们越来越意识到使用术前手术规划软体的好处。
  • 根据最终用途,由于在整形外科诊所寻求手术的患者数量不断增加以及全球整形外科诊所数量的不断增加,预计整形外科诊所将在 2024 年占据主导地位。

目录

第一章调查方法与范围

第二章执行摘要

第三章市场变数、趋势和范围

  • 市场展望
    • 母市场展望
    • 相关/附随市场展望
  • 美国整形外科手术规划软体市场-市场动态
    • 市场驱动因素分析
    • 市场限制因素分析
  • 美国整形外科手术规划软体市场:分析工具
    • 波特五力分析
    • PESTLE分析
  • 整形外科手术规划软体产业的当前市场趋势
  • 案例研究分析

第四章美国整形外科手术计画软体市场:软体产品评估与趋势分析

  • 定义和范围
  • 2024 年和 2030 年软体供应商市场占有率分析
  • 细分仪表板
  • 美国整形外科手术规划软体市场(依软体产品划分),2018 年至 2030 年
  • 云端基础
  • 本地

第五章美国整形外科手术计划软体市场:软体类型的估计和趋势分析

  • 定义和范围
  • 2024 年及 2030 年按软体类型分類的市场占有率分析
  • 细分仪表板
  • 美国整形外科手术规划软体市场(按软体类型划分),2018 年至 2030 年
  • 术前
  • 术后

第六章美国整形外科手术计划软体市场:最终用途估计和趋势分析

  • 定义和范围
  • 2024 年及 2030 年最终用途市场占有率分析
  • 细分仪表板
  • 美国整形外科手术规划软体市场(按最终用途划分),2018 年至 2030 年
  • 医院
  • 整形外科诊所

第七章美国整形外科手术计画软体市场:竞争格局

  • 参与企业
  • 2024年企业市场分析
  • 战略地图
  • 公司简介
    • Stryker
    • Radlink, Inc.
    • Zimmer Biomet
    • DePuy Synthes (Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Companies)
    • Enhatch Inc.
    • Brainlab AG
    • Corin Group.
    • EOS imaging (ATEC Spine Inc.)
    • Formus Labs Ltd
    • mediCAD.
Product Code: GVR-4-68040-536-3

U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market Growth & Trends:

The U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market size is expected to reach USD 34.87 million by 2030 and is expected to expand at a CAGR of 6.05% from 2025 to 2030, according to a new study by Grand View Research, Inc. Increasing adoption of orthopedic surgical planning software by hospitals and clinics for efficient workflow management is driving market growth. Moreover, technological advancements and innovations in precision and efficiency in the industry boost market growth. For instance, in June 2021, Radlink, Inc. introduced Radlink3D, an intraoperative software designed to assess cup positions and address pelvic tilt and spinopelvic mobility during total hip replacement surgeries. This innovative technology employs 2D-3D registration for preoperative planning.

As the global population ages, there is a substantial rise in the prevalence of age-related orthopedic conditions, such as osteoarthritis, degenerative joint diseases, fractures, and osteoporosis. As per the WHO report, by the year 2030, one in every six individuals globally will be 60 years or older. At that time, the percentage of the population aged 60 and up will rise from 1 billion in 2020 to 1.4 billion. By the year 2050, the global population of those aged 60 years and above will be twice as large, reaching 2.1 billion. This demographic is particularly vulnerable to orthopedic conditions due to the natural degeneration of bones and joints over time, along with decreased mobility and muscle mass. Thus, such factors are anticipated to fuel market growth over the forecast period.

Furthermore, minimally invasive surgeries have gained attention in orthopedics for their benefits, including smaller incisions, less tissue trauma, and faster recovery times. Common procedures include arthroscopy, endoscopic spinal surgeries, and minimally invasive joint replacements. These techniques necessitate thorough preoperative and postoperative planning because of their complexity. Orthopedic surgical planning software plays a crucial role by providing detailed 3D visualizations, real-time simulations, and precise measurements. This technology helps surgeons navigate complex anatomical structures effectively, contributing to the accelerated growth of the market.

Furthermore, market players are opting for various strategic initiatives expected to boost the growth of the market in the country. Medtronic has launched new AI-driven preoperative planning tools tailored for orthopedic surgeries, responding to the increasing demand for advanced technologies in the field. This initiative reflects a broader trend of integrating artificial intelligence into surgical planning processes to enhance precision and outcomes. In addition, in June 2024, Zimmer Biomet formed a strategic partnership with a healthcare software provider to develop AI-powered preoperative planning tools aimed at improving precision in orthopedic surgeries. Such collaborations emphasize the commitment of major players to innovate and enhance surgical planning technologies.

U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market Report Highlights:

  • Based on software delivery, the cloud-based segment held the largest revenue share in 2024, owing to rising technological advancements, and a shortage of skilled professionals to operate and manage this software in healthcare facilities.
  • Based on software type, the pre-operative segment dominated the market with revenue share in 2024, due to growing awareness regarding the benefits associated with the use of pre-operative surgical planning software.
  • Based on end use, the orthopedic clinics owing to patients' increasing preference for surgery in orthopedic clinics and the increasing number of orthopedic clinics globally.

Table of Contents

Chapter 1. Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1. Market Segmentation & Scope
    • 1.1.1. Segment scope
    • 1.1.2. Regional scope
    • 1.1.3. Estimates and forecast timeline
  • 1.2. Research Methodology
  • 1.3. Information Procurement
    • 1.3.1. Purchased database
    • 1.3.2. GVR's internal database
    • 1.3.3. Secondary sources
    • 1.3.4. Primary research
    • 1.3.5. Details of primary research
  • 1.4. Information or Data Analysis
    • 1.4.1. Data analysis models
  • 1.5. Market Formulation & Validation
  • 1.6. Model Details
    • 1.6.1. Commodity flow analysis (Model 1)
      • 1.6.1.1. Approach 1: Commodity flow approach
  • 1.7. Research Assumptions
  • 1.8. List of Secondary Sources
  • 1.9. List of Primary Sources

Chapter 2. Executive Summary

  • 2.1. Market Outlook
  • 2.2. Segment Outlook
    • 2.2.1. Software Delivery outlook
    • 2.2.2. Software Type outlook
    • 2.2.3. End Use outlook
  • 2.3. Competitive Insights

Chapter 3. Market Variables, Trends, and Scope

  • 3.1. Market Lineage Outlook
    • 3.1.1. Parent Market Outlook
    • 3.1.2. Related/Ancillary Market Outlook
  • 3.2. U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market - Market Dynamics
    • 3.2.1. Market Driver Analysis
    • 3.2.2. Market Restraint Analysis
  • 3.3. U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market: Analysis Tools
    • 3.3.1. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 3.3.2. PESTLE Analysis
  • 3.4. Current Market Trends in Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Industry
  • 3.5. Case Study Analysis

Chapter 4. U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market: Software Delivery Estimates & Trend Analysis

  • 4.1. Definition and Scope
  • 4.2. Software Delivery Market Share Analysis, 2024 & 2030
  • 4.3. Segment Dashboard
  • 4.4. U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market, by Software Delivery, 2018 to 2030
  • 4.5. Cloud-based
    • 4.5.1. Cloud-based Market Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
  • 4.6. On-premise
    • 4.6.1. On-premise Market Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)

Chapter 5. U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market: Software Type Estimates & Trend Analysis

  • 5.1. Definition and Scope
  • 5.2. Software Type Market Share Analysis, 2024 & 2030
  • 5.3. Segment Dashboard
  • 5.4. U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market, by Software Type, 2018 to 2030
  • 5.5. Pre-Operative
    • 5.5.1. Pre-Operative Market Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
  • 5.6. Post Operative
    • 5.6.1. Post Operative Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)

Chapter 6. U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market: End Use Estimates & Trend Analysis

  • 6.1. Definition and Scope
  • 6.2. End Use Market Share Analysis, 2024 & 2030
  • 6.3. Segment Dashboard
  • 6.4. U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market, by End Use, 2018 to 2030
  • 6.5. Hospitals
    • 6.5.1. Hospitals Market Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
  • 6.6. Orthopedic Clinics
    • 6.6.1. Orthopedic Clinics Market Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)

Chapter 7. U.S. Orthopedic Surgical Planning Software Market: Competitive Landscape

  • 7.1. Participant's Categorization
  • 7.2. Company Market Position Analysis, 2024
  • 7.3. Strategy Mapping
  • 7.4. Company Profiles
    • 7.4.1. Stryker
      • 7.4.1.1. Overview
      • 7.4.1.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.1.3. Product Benchmarking
      • 7.4.1.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.2. Radlink, Inc.
      • 7.4.2.1. Overview
      • 7.4.2.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.2.3. Product Benchmarking
      • 7.4.2.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.3. Zimmer Biomet
      • 7.4.3.1. Overview
      • 7.4.3.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.3.3. Product Benchmarking
      • 7.4.3.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.4. DePuy Synthes (Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Companies)
      • 7.4.4.1. Overview
      • 7.4.4.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.4.3. Product Benchmarking
      • 7.4.4.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.5. Enhatch Inc.
      • 7.4.5.1. Overview
      • 7.4.5.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.5.3. Product Benchmarking
      • 7.4.5.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.6. Brainlab AG
      • 7.4.6.1. Overview
      • 7.4.6.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.6.3. Product Benchmarking
      • 7.4.6.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.7. Corin Group.
      • 7.4.7.1. Overview
      • 7.4.7.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.7.3. Product Benchmarking
      • 7.4.7.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.8. EOS imaging (ATEC Spine Inc.)
      • 7.4.8.1. Overview
      • 7.4.8.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.8.3. Product Benchmarking
      • 7.4.8.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.9. Formus Labs Ltd
      • 7.4.9.1. Overview
      • 7.4.9.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.9.3. Product Benchmarking
      • 7.4.9.4. Strategic Initiatives
    • 7.4.10. mediCAD.
      • 7.4.10.1. Overview
      • 7.4.10.2. Financial Performance
      • 7.4.10.3. Product Benchmarking
      • 7.4.10.4. Strategic Initiatives

List of Tables

  • Table 1 List of secondary sources
  • Table 2 List of abbreviations
  • Table 3 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market, by software delivery, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
  • Table 4 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market, by software type, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
  • Table 5 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market, by end-use, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)

List of Figures

  • Fig. 1 Market research process
  • Fig. 2 Data triangulation techniques
  • Fig. 3 Primary research pattern
  • Fig. 4 Value-chain-based sizing & forecasting
  • Fig. 5 QFD modeling for market share assessment
  • Fig. 6 Market research approaches
  • Fig. 7 Market formulation & validation
  • Fig. 8 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market: market outlook
  • Fig. 9 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software competitive insights
  • Fig. 10 Parent market outlook
  • Fig. 11 Related/ancillary market outlook.
  • Fig. 12 Industry value chain analysis
  • Fig. 13 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market driver impact
  • Fig. 14 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market restraint impact
  • Fig. 15 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market strategic initiatives analysis
  • Fig. 16 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market: Software Delivery movement analysis
  • Fig. 17 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market: Software Delivery outlook and key takeaways
  • Fig. 18 Cloud-based market estimates and forecasts, 2018 - 2030
  • Fig. 19 On-premise market estimates and forecasts, 2018 - 2030
  • Fig. 20 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market: Software Type movement analysis
  • Fig. 21 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market: Software Type outlook and key takeaways
  • Fig. 22 Pre-Operative market estimates and forecasts, 2018 - 2030
  • Fig. 23 Post Operative market estimates and forecasts, 2018 - 2030
  • Fig. 24 Others market estimates and forecasts, 2018 - 2030
  • Fig. 25 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market: End Use movement analysis
  • Fig. 26 U.S. orthopedic surgical planning software market: End Use outlook and key takeaways
  • Fig. 27 Hospitals market estimates and forecasts, 2018 - 2030
  • Fig. 28 Orthopedic Clinics market estimates and forecasts, 2018 - 2030
  • Fig. 29 Heatmap Analysis, 2024