空气分离装置市场（按产品、技术、营运模式、产能、安装类型和最终用途产业）—2025-2030 年全球预测

2024 年空气分离装置市值为 50.2 亿美元，预计 2025 年将成长至 52.7 亿美元，复合年增长率为 5.19%，到 2030 年将达到 68 亿美元。

主要市场统计数据
基准年2024年	50.2亿美元
预计2025年	52.7亿美元
预计2030年	68亿美元
复合年增长率（%）	5.19%

对影响工业气体供需的空气分离装置的核心技术、产品差异化和运作模式的权威定位

空气分离装置产业处于工业需求、技术发展和监管变革的关键交汇点，需要为规划投资和营运调整的相关人员提供明确的方向。本简介概述了空气分离系统的核心功能——生产氮气、氧气和氩气等主要气体——以及氪气、氖气和氙气等稀有气体的专业供应链，并解释了这些产品流如何支持从医疗保健到半导体製造等各个行业。透过阐明低温和非低温技术的差异以及公司供应和现场供应之间的操作差异，为读者提供理解以下章节所需的概念框架。

技术、营运和需求面转型的深度融合正在重塑整个空气分离价值链的竞争优势

空气分离领域正在经历一场变革，其驱动力包括脱碳目标、营运数位化以及不断变化的终端用户需求，这些需求正在重新定义竞争优势。在技​​术方面，低温系统的渐进式改进与非低温方法的快速发展相得益彰。膜分离和变压式吸附在中型和模组化应用中越来越可行，陶瓷、中空纤维和聚合物薄膜材料的创新正在提高选择性和使用寿命。因此，资产所有者正在评估生命週期总拥有成本，而不仅仅是初始投资，这促使他们重新平衡采购标准，转向能源效率、可维护性和可再生能源整合。

关于 2025 年关税如何改变空气分离计划的采购、供应链本地化和供应商选择优先顺序的策略分析

2025年实施的重大关税将对空分装置的资本采购、供应商选择和供应链架构产生累积影响，其影响范围涵盖设备采购到计划交付时间等各个方面。低温塔、专用压缩机和薄膜组件等进口零件的到岸成本不断上升，这正在重塑供应商评估，并促使采购团队优先考虑本地製造的替代方案或协商保护性合约条款。因此，开发供应商正在将关税风险纳入采购规范和应急计划，延长供应商合格期限，并优先考虑製造地分布在各地的供应商。

整合产品类型、技术路径、营运模式、容量层级、安装选项和最终用途产业要求的综合细分情报

基于细分的洞察揭示了差异化的产品类型、技术平台、营运模式、容量层级、安装选项和最终用途产业如何创造独特的价值池和营运重点。透过产品细分，氧气、氮气和氩气等主要气体仍然是工业应用的支柱，而氪气、氖气和氙气等稀有气体则服务于专门的高价值细分市场。同时，非冷媒方法，包括膜分离和变压式吸附，以及陶瓷膜、中空纤维膜和聚合物膜等膜亚型，正在为中小型应用提供模组化、低能耗的解决方案。

具有区域差异化观点的公司，了解美洲、中东和非洲以及亚太地区的动态将如何影响技术采用、区域化和需求组合

区域动态对整个空气分离生态系的技术采用、供应链设计、监管风险和需求结构有重大影响。在美洲，成熟的产业丛集和强大的现场及商业供应商基础推动着低温和非低温解决方案的均衡采用，特别注重与脱碳项目和模组化现场系统的整合，以降低物流风险。在欧洲、中东和非洲，不同的监管环境、能源转型政策和基础设施构成了碎片化的格局，先进製造业的高纯度需求与传统工业区的棕地现代化机会并存。欧洲、中东和非洲地区的政策制定者和公用事业公司通常透过奖励机制和电网脱碳时间表来影响计划的经济效益，因此监管参与对计划可行性至关重要。

推动空气分离解决方案供应商差异化、服务模式和区域市场渗透的关键企业级策略行动和伙伴关係

公司层级的策略越来越注重技术差异化、售后服务、策略联盟以及拓展区域能力，以抓住整个空分领域的发展机会。领先的设备和解决方案供应商正优先投资模组化和非冷媒技术，以缩短中型应用的部署週期并降低资本强度，同时提高大型高纯度设施的低温效率。服务内容正在从交易型维护转向基于结果的合同，该合约捆绑了预测性维护、备件保固和性能保证，从而创造经常性收益流并建立更紧密的客户关係。

为高阶主管提供实际的优先策略行动，以增强供应链弹性、优化技术选择并加速空气分离计划的价值实现

产业领导者应采取一系列切实可行的优先事项，将策略洞察转化为采购、技术和服务领域的永续营运优势。首先，协商包含价格调整机制和原产地透明度的长期供应协议，同时实现采购多元化，并加速高风险零件的近岸外包，以减轻关税影响并缩短前置作业时间。其次，将技术投资与最终用途需求结合，优化资本配置和部署速度，针对中小型需求采用非低温模组化解决方案，为需要持续高纯度供应的设施预留低温多塔装置。

一种透明且可复製的研究途径，结合专家访谈、技术综合、情境测试和交叉检验，得出可行的结论

支撑这些研究结果的调查方法结合了结构化的一手资料研究、专家意见、严格的二手证据整合以及三角测量分析，以确保研究的稳健性和可操作性。主要资讯包括对工厂营运商、EPC承包商、目标商标产品製造商、技术开发商和最终用户采购主导者的访谈，以了解营运限制、供应商绩效经验以及技术采用的障碍。二手资料分析则利用技术标准、监管文件、专利活动和公开的计划案例，来检验技术发展轨迹和过往的采用模式。

策略整合再次证明，技术灵活性、供应链弹性和服务创新将决定空气分离产业的长期成功

总而言之，空气分离装置的格局正在从主要由规模经济定义的模式转变为由技术灵活性、供应链弹性和服务主导模式决定长期竞争的模式。虽然主要气体将继续支持广泛的工业活动，但稀有气体将扩展到需要高纯度和可追溯性的战略性利基市场。技术选择将越来越多地受到能源效率、部署速度以及与电气化和可再生能源整合能力等因素的综合影响，这使得非低温和模组化配置在许多使用案例中更具吸引力。

目录

第一章：前言

第二章调查方法

第三章执行摘要

第四章 市场概述

第五章市场动态

• 采用先进的薄膜分离技术提高空分装置的能源效率
• 实施数位双胞胎和预测分析以优化空气分离装置的性能和维护
• 推出模组化和撬装式空气分离装置，可在偏远的工业设施中快速安装
• 在空气分离设施中整合再生能源来源和绿色氢气生产以减少排放
• 利用低温热回收系统降低营运成本并提高空气分离过程的永续性。
• 根据严格的纯度标准，扩展医疗和食品级应用的现场氮气和氧气生成解决方案
• 与空气分离装置营运商和工业气体供应商建立策略伙伴关係，确保长期供应协议

第六章 市场洞察

• 波特五力分析
• PESTEL分析

第七章：2025年美国关税的累积影响

8. 空气分离装置市场（依产品）

• 主要气体
  • 氩气
  • 氮
  • 氧
• 稀有气体
  • 氪
  • 氖
  • 氙

9. 空气分离装置市场（依技术）

• 低温空气分离
  • 双柱低温
  • 单塔低温
• 非深冷空气分离
  • 膜分离
    • 陶瓷膜
    • 中空纤维膜
    • 聚合物薄膜
  • 变压式吸附

第 10 章空气分离装置市场（依营运模式）

• 商业销售类型
• 现场

11. 空气分离装置市场（依容量）

• 大规模
• 中等尺寸
• 小规模

第 12 章。空气分离装置市场（依安装类型）

• 棕地
• 待开发区

13. 空气分离装置市场（依最终用途产业）

• 化工和石化
• 电子和半导体
• 食品/饮料
• 医疗保健和医学
• 钢铁製造
• 石油和天然气
• 水和污水处理

14. 美国空气分离装置市场

• 美国
• 加拿大
• 墨西哥
• 巴西
• 阿根廷

15.欧洲、中东和非洲空气分离装置市场

• 英国
• 德国
• 法国
• 俄罗斯
• 义大利
• 西班牙
• 阿拉伯聯合大公国
• 沙乌地阿拉伯
• 南非
• 丹麦
• 荷兰
• 卡达
• 芬兰
• 瑞典
• 奈及利亚
• 埃及
• 土耳其
• 以色列
• 挪威
• 波兰
• 瑞士

16.亚太空气分离装置市场

• 中国
• 印度
• 日本
• 澳洲
• 韩国
• 印尼
• 泰国
• 菲律宾
• 马来西亚
• 新加坡
• 越南
• 台湾

第十七章竞争格局

• 2024年市场占有率分析
• 2024年FPNV定位矩阵
• 竞争分析
  • AMCS Corporation
  • Nikkiso Clean Energy & Industrial Gases Group
  • Comi Polaris Systems
  • CRYOSPAIN, SL
  • Hangzhou Azbel Technology Co., Ltd.
  • Hangzhou Fortune Gas Cryogenic Group Co., Ltd.
  • Hangzhou Nuzhuo Technology Co., Ltd.
  • Hangzhou Oxygen Group Co., Ltd.
  • INOX-Air Products Inc.
  • Jilin Hangairsep Co., Ltd.
  • Kaifeng Air Separation Group Co., Ltd.
  • KROHNE Group
  • L'AIR LIQUIDE SA
  • Linde PLC
  • Messer Group
  • Nikkiso Co., Ltd.
  • Novair Group
  • Ranch Cryogenics, Inc.
  • Sanghi Oxygen PVT.LTD,
  • SIAD Macchine Impianti SpA
  • Sichuan Air Separation Plant Group
  • Siemens AG.
  • Sinerga SpA
  • Suzhou Oxygen Plant Co., Ltd.
  • Taiyo Nippon Sanso Corporation
  • Technex Group
  • Universal Industrial Gases, Inc.
  • Universal Ing. La. Boschi Plants Pvt. Ltd.
  • Wobo Industrial Group Corp.
  • Yingde Gases Group Company Limited
  • Zhejiang Yuanda Air Separation Equipment Co., Ltd.

第十八章 研究人工智慧

第十九章 研究统计

第二十章 研究联络人

第21章 研究报导

第22章 附录

The Air Separation Plant Market was valued at USD 5.02 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 5.27 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 5.19%, reaching USD 6.80 billion by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024]	USD 5.02 billion
Estimated Year [2025]	USD 5.27 billion
Forecast Year [2030]	USD 6.80 billion
CAGR (%)	5.19%

An authoritative orientation to core air separation plant technologies, product distinctions, and operational paradigms shaping industrial gas supply and demand

The air separation plant sector stands at a pivotal intersection of industrial demand, technological evolution, and regulatory change, requiring a clear orientation for stakeholders planning investments or operational adjustments. This introduction frames the core functional roles of air separation systems in producing primary gases such as nitrogen, oxygen, and argon, alongside the specialized supply chain for rare gases including krypton, neon, and xenon, and explains how these product streams underpin sectors from healthcare to semiconductor fabrication. By clarifying the distinctions between cryogenic and non-cryogenic technologies and the operational dichotomy of merchant versus onsite supply, this orientation equips readers with the conceptual map needed to interpret subsequent sections.

Beyond technology taxonomy, the introduction highlights emergent drivers that are reshaping demand profiles: intensifying requirements for high-purity gases in electronics and life sciences, the growing appetite for onsite gas generation to mitigate logistics risk, and the influence of installation typologies such as brownfield upgrades versus greenfield builds on capital deployment patterns. This contextualization also previews how capacity choices-large, medium, and small scale-interact with project economics and supply chain resilience. Ultimately, the introduction establishes the analytical lens through which stakeholders can assess vendor strategies, project delivery models, and risk mitigation tactics in an environment defined by both opportunity and structural disruption

An in-depth synthesis of technological, operational, and demand-side transformations that are reshaping competitive advantage across the air separation value chain

The landscape of air separation is undergoing transformative shifts driven by decarbonization goals, digitalization of operations, and evolving end-use demands that collectively redefine competitive advantage. On the technology front, the incremental improvements to cryogenic systems are being matched by rapid advances in non-cryogenic methods; membrane separation and pressure-swing adsorption are increasingly viable for mid-scale and modular applications while innovations in ceramic, hollow-fibre, and polymeric membrane materials are improving selectivity and longevity. As a result, asset owners are evaluating lifecycle total cost of ownership rather than upfront capex alone, prompting a rebalancing of procurement criteria toward energy efficiency, maintainability, and integration with renewable electricity sources.

Simultaneously, market dynamics are altering project rationales: demand for ultra-high-purity gases in semiconductor fabrication and advanced medical therapies is expanding the market for rare gases and specialized purification trains, whereas industrial decarbonization is incentivizing electrified processes and waste heat integration that reduce operational carbon intensity. Supply chain resilience has risen to strategic prominence, encouraging firms to pursue localization and supplier diversification. In parallel, digital solutions-predictive maintenance, remote asset management, and performance analytics-are shifting service models from reactive maintenance toward outcome-based contracts, thereby changing revenue models for equipment suppliers and service providers. Together, these shifts create an environment where technical differentiation, supply chain strategy, and service innovation determine long-term competitiveness

A strategic analysis of how 2025 tariff measures have reshaped procurement, supply chain localization, and vendor selection priorities across air separation projects

The introduction of significant tariff measures in 2025 has exerted a cumulative influence on capital procurement, vendor selection, and supply chain architecture for air separation plants, with effects that extend from equipment sourcing to project delivery timelines. Imported components such as cryogenic columns, specialized compressors, and membrane modules have seen elevated landed costs that reshape supplier evaluations and encourage procurement teams to prioritize locally manufactured alternatives or negotiate protective contractual clauses. Consequently, developers are increasingly incorporating tariff risk into procurement specifications and contingency planning, which has led to lengthened vendor qualification windows and a premium on suppliers with geographically diversified manufacturing footprints.

Moreover, the tariff environment has prompted strategic responses from project sponsors and equipment manufacturers alike. Some firms have accelerated nearshoring efforts and established regional assembly centers to mitigate import exposure, while others have reconfigured bill-of-materials to substitute higher-risk components with domestically sourced equivalents where feasible. End users have absorbed portions of cost increases through renegotiated service agreements or shifted toward onsite generation to reduce logistics-dependent exposures. Regulatory compliance and documentation requirements associated with tariff classifications have also increased administrative burdens, elevating the value of suppliers who offer clarity on origin, traceability, and customs support. In sum, the tariffs have catalyzed a reorientation toward supply chain resilience, localization, and contractual protections that will persist as risk management priorities

Comprehensive segmentation intelligence integrating product types, technology pathways, operation modes, capacity tiers, installation choices, and end-use industry imperatives

Segmentation-driven insights reveal how differentiated product types, technology platforms, operation modes, capacity tiers, installation choices, and end-use industries create distinct value pools and operational priorities. When viewed through product segmentation, primary gases such as oxygen, nitrogen, and argon remain the backbone of industrial applications, while rare gases like krypton, neon, and xenon serve specialized, high-value niches; this implies divergent procurement timelines and purity specifications that affect plant design and downstream handling. From the technology segmentation perspective, cryogenic air separation-available in double-column and single-column configurations-continues to dominate large-scale, high-purity requirements, whereas non-cryogenic approaches including membrane separation and pressure swing adsorption, with membrane subtypes of ceramic, hollow-fibre, and polymeric membranes, enable modular, lower-energy solutions for medium and small-scale applications.

Operation mode segmentation differentiates merchant supply chains from onsite generation strategies; merchant models emphasize logistics optimization and inventory management, while onsite systems prioritize reliability, footprint, and integration with onsite utilities. Capacity segmentation into large, medium, and small scales shapes capital intensity and flexibility, with small-scale units delivering faster deployment and lower capital lock-in, and large-scale plants offering economies of scale for base-load industrial consumers. Installation type-brownfield upgrades versus greenfield builds-influences permitting complexity, timeline, and the feasibility of integrating waste heat or renewable electricity. Finally, end-use industry segmentation highlights that chemical and petrochemical sectors prioritize continuous supply and large volumes, electronics and semiconductor markets demand ultra-high purity and trace contaminant control, food and beverage focus on food-grade specifications, healthcare requires fail-safe redundancy for medical oxygen, iron and steel prioritize on-site oxygen enrichment, oil and gas seek integrated gas management, and water treatment leverages oxygen-enhanced processes. Together, these segmentation perspectives inform tailored technology choices, procurement strategies, and service models for different stakeholder objectives

A regionally differentiated perspective on how Americas, Europe-Middle East-Africa, and Asia-Pacific dynamics influence technology adoption, localization, and demand composition

Regional dynamics exert a profound influence on technology adoption, supply chain design, regulatory exposure, and demand composition across the air separation ecosystem. In the Americas, established industrial clusters and a strong base of onsite and merchant providers drive a balanced adoption of cryogenic and non-cryogenic solutions, with particular emphasis on integration with decarbonization programs and modular onsite systems that reduce logistical risk. Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency, energy transition policies, and infrastructure variability shape a fragmented landscape where high-purity demand in advanced manufacturing coexists with opportunities for brownfield modernization in legacy industrial zones. Policymakers and utilities in EMEA frequently influence project economics through incentive structures and grid decarbonization schedules, making regulatory engagement essential for project viability.

Asia-Pacific exhibits heterogeneous but pronounced growth dynamics, driven by rapid industrialization, expanded semiconductor capacity, and growing healthcare infrastructure, which collectively elevate demand for both primary and rare gases. Local supply chain development and localization strategies are particularly salient in this region as governments and industrial consortia prioritize domestic manufacturing resilience. Across all regions, differences in labor cost structures, permitting timelines, and utility pricing affect the optimal mix of cryogenic versus non-cryogenic technologies and the attractiveness of greenfield versus brownfield investments. Consequently, firms must adopt region-specific strategies that account for regulatory incentives, local supplier ecosystems, and end-user concentration to achieve operational and commercial objectives

Critical company-level strategic behaviors and partnerships that determine supplier differentiation, service models, and regional market penetration for air separation solutions

Company-level strategies are increasingly focused on technological differentiation, after-sales services, strategic alliances, and regional capacity expansion to capture evolving opportunities across the air separation sector. Leading equipment and solution providers are prioritizing investments in modular and non-cryogenic technologies to address faster deployment cycles and lower capital intensity for mid-scale applications, while also advancing cryogenic efficiency improvements for large-scale, high-purity installations. Service offerings are shifting from transactional maintenance to outcome-based contracts that bundle predictive maintenance, spare parts assurance, and performance guarantees, creating recurring revenue streams and closer customer relationships.

Partnerships and joint ventures are common tactical responses to demand for localization and market access; firms are forming regional manufacturing or assembly hubs, and entering collaborative R&D projects to accelerate membrane and compressor innovations. Companies that excel in documentation, compliance support, and supply chain traceability gain a competitive edge in tariff-impacted procurement environments. Additionally, digital platforms that aggregate performance data, enable remote diagnostics, and support lifecycle optimization are becoming differentiators in vendor selection. For stakeholders evaluating supplier ecosystems, priority should be given to firms demonstrating reliable delivery history, transparent total cost of ownership models, and clear roadmaps for technology upgrades and service continuity

Practical and prioritized strategic actions for executives to enhance supply chain resilience, optimize technology choices, and accelerate value realization in air separation projects

Industry leaders should pursue a set of actionable priorities to convert strategic insight into sustained operational advantage across procurement, technology, and service domains. First, diversify sourcing and accelerate nearshoring for high-risk components to reduce tariff exposure and shorten lead times, while negotiating long-term supply agreements that include price adjustment mechanisms and origin transparency. Second, align technology investments with end-use requirements by employing non-cryogenic, modular solutions for medium and small-scale needs and reserving cryogenic, multi-column plants for installations demanding continuous high-purity supply, thereby optimizing capital allocation and deployment speed.

Third, implement digital twin and predictive maintenance solutions to improve uptime and reduce lifecycle costs, and design service propositions that transition customers from capex-heavy models to outcome-based, performance-guaranteed contracts. Fourth, prioritize localization and brownfield modernization where regulatory incentives and logistics advantages exist, and structure project finance to account for tariff-related contingencies and permitting variabilities. Fifth, develop targeted commercial strategies for high-growth end uses such as semiconductors and healthcare that require specialized purity and reliability standards, and establish cross-functional teams to address regulatory compliance, environmental reporting, and stakeholder engagement. By sequencing these actions-starting with supply chain resilience, followed by targeted technology deployment, digital enablement, and market-specific commercial playbooks-leaders can reduce project risk and accelerate time-to-value

A transparent and reproducible research approach combining expert interviews, technical synthesis, scenario testing, and cross-validation to underpin actionable conclusions

The research methodology underpinning these insights combines structured primary engagement with domain experts, rigorous secondary evidence synthesis, and analytical triangulation to ensure robustness and actionable relevance. Primary inputs include interviews with plant operators, EPC contractors, original equipment manufacturers, technology developers, and end-user procurement leads to capture operational constraints, vendor performance experience, and technology adoption barriers. Secondary analysis draws on technical standards, regulatory documentation, patent activity, and publicly available project case studies to validate technology trajectories and historical implementation patterns.

Analytical steps include segmentation mapping across product, technology, operation mode, capacity, installation type, and end-use industry to ensure results are aligned with practical decision frameworks. Scenario analysis was applied to assess supply chain responses to tariff shocks and regional regulatory shifts, and sensitivity checks were used to test assumptions related to equipment lead times, component substitutability, and service model adoption. Findings were cross-validated through peer review with independent technical specialists and iterative feedback from industry participants to refine conclusions and ensure recommendations are operationally grounded

A strategic synthesis reaffirming that technology flexibility, supply chain resilience, and service innovation will determine long-term success in the air separation sector

In conclusion, the air separation plant landscape is transitioning from a paradigm defined primarily by scale economies toward one where technology flexibility, supply chain resilience, and service-driven models determine long-term competitiveness. Primary gases will continue to underpin broad industrial activity while rare gases will expand in strategic niches that demand high purity and traceability. Technology choice will increasingly be governed by a blend of energy efficiency, deployment speed, and integration capability with electrified or renewable power sources, making non-cryogenic and modular configurations more attractive for many use cases.

The cumulative effect of recent tariff developments and regional policy shifts is to elevate localization, contractual clarity, and supplier diversification as core risk mitigation strategies. Firms that couple targeted investments in membrane and compressor innovations with digital service platforms and region-specific commercial playbooks will be best positioned to capture value. Ultimately, success in this evolving environment depends on aligning technical decisions with end-user requirements, regulatory landscapes, and pragmatic supply chain strategies to deliver resilient, efficient, and dependable gas supply solutions

Table of Contents

1. Preface

• 1.1. Objectives of the Study
• 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
• 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
• 1.4. Currency & Pricing
• 1.5. Language
• 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Define: Research Objective
• 2.2. Determine: Research Design
• 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
• 2.4. Collect: Data Source
• 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
• 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
• 2.7. Publish: Research Report
• 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

• 4.1. Introduction
• 4.2. Market Sizing & Forecasting

5. Market Dynamics

• 5.1. Adoption of advanced membrane separation technologies to improve energy efficiency in air separation plants
• 5.2. Implementation of digital twin and predictive analytics for optimized air separation unit performance and maintenance
• 5.3. Deployment of modular and skid-mounted air separation units for rapid installation at remote industrial sites
• 5.4. Integration of renewable power sources and green hydrogen production within air separation facilities to lower emissions
• 5.5. Utilization of cryogenic heat recovery systems to reduce operational costs and enhance process sustainability in air separation
• 5.6. Expansion of on-site nitrogen and oxygen generation solutions for medical and food-grade applications under strict purity standards
• 5.7. Strategic partnerships between air separation plant operators and industrial gas suppliers to secure long-term supply agreements

6. Market Insights

• 6.1. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
• 6.2. PESTLE Analysis

7. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

8. Air Separation Plant Market, by Product

• 8.1. Introduction
• 8.2. Primary Gases
  • 8.2.1. Argon
  • 8.2.2. Nitrogen
  • 8.2.3. Oxygen
• 8.3. Rare Gases
  • 8.3.1. Krypton
  • 8.3.2. Neon
  • 8.3.3. Xenon

9. Air Separation Plant Market, by Technology

• 9.1. Introduction
• 9.2. Cryogenic Air Separation
  • 9.2.1. Double-column Cryogenic
  • 9.2.2. Single-column Cryogenic
• 9.3. Non-cryogenic Air Separation
  • 9.3.1. Membrane Separation
    • 9.3.1.1. Ceramic Membranes
    • 9.3.1.2. Hollow-fibre Membranes
    • 9.3.1.3. Polymeric Membranes
  • 9.3.2. Pressure Swing Adsorption

10. Air Separation Plant Market, by Operation Mode

• 10.1. Introduction
• 10.2. Merchant
• 10.3. Onsite

11. Air Separation Plant Market, by Capacity

• 11.1. Introduction
• 11.2. Large Scale
• 11.3. Medium Scale
• 11.4. Small Scale

12. Air Separation Plant Market, by Installation Type

• 12.1. Introduction
• 12.2. Brownfield
• 12.3. Greenfield

13. Air Separation Plant Market, by End Use Industry

• 13.1. Introduction
• 13.2. Chemical & Petrochemical
• 13.3. Electronics & Semiconductor
• 13.4. Food & Beverage
• 13.5. Healthcare & Medical
• 13.6. Iron & Steel Manufacturing
• 13.7. Oil & Gas
• 13.8. Water & Wastewater Treatment

14. Americas Air Separation Plant Market

• 14.1. Introduction
• 14.2. United States
• 14.3. Canada
• 14.4. Mexico
• 14.5. Brazil
• 14.6. Argentina

15. Europe, Middle East & Africa Air Separation Plant Market

• 15.1. Introduction
• 15.2. United Kingdom
• 15.3. Germany
• 15.4. France
• 15.5. Russia
• 15.6. Italy
• 15.7. Spain
• 15.8. United Arab Emirates
• 15.9. Saudi Arabia
• 15.10. South Africa
• 15.11. Denmark
• 15.12. Netherlands
• 15.13. Qatar
• 15.14. Finland
• 15.15. Sweden
• 15.16. Nigeria
• 15.17. Egypt
• 15.18. Turkey
• 15.19. Israel
• 15.20. Norway
• 15.21. Poland
• 15.22. Switzerland

16. Asia-Pacific Air Separation Plant Market

• 16.1. Introduction
• 16.2. China
• 16.3. India
• 16.4. Japan
• 16.5. Australia
• 16.6. South Korea
• 16.7. Indonesia
• 16.8. Thailand
• 16.9. Philippines
• 16.10. Malaysia
• 16.11. Singapore
• 16.12. Vietnam
• 16.13. Taiwan

17. Competitive Landscape

• 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
• 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
• 17.3. Competitive Analysis
  • 17.3.1. AMCS Corporation
  • 17.3.2. Nikkiso Clean Energy & Industrial Gases Group
  • 17.3.3. Comi Polaris Systems
  • 17.3.4. CRYOSPAIN, S.L.
  • 17.3.5. Hangzhou Azbel Technology Co., Ltd.
  • 17.3.6. Hangzhou Fortune Gas Cryogenic Group Co., Ltd.
  • 17.3.7. Hangzhou Nuzhuo Technology Co., Ltd.
  • 17.3.8. Hangzhou Oxygen Group Co., Ltd.
  • 17.3.9. INOX-Air Products Inc.
  • 17.3.10. Jilin Hangairsep Co., Ltd.
  • 17.3.11. Kaifeng Air Separation Group Co., Ltd.
  • 17.3.12. KROHNE Group
  • 17.3.13. L'AIR LIQUIDE S.A.
  • 17.3.14. Linde PLC
  • 17.3.15. Messer Group
  • 17.3.16. Nikkiso Co., Ltd.
  • 17.3.17. Novair Group
  • 17.3.18. Ranch Cryogenics, Inc.
  • 17.3.19. Sanghi Oxygen PVT.LTD,
  • 17.3.20. SIAD Macchine Impianti S.p.A.
  • 17.3.21. Sichuan Air Separation Plant Group
  • 17.3.22. Siemens AG.
  • 17.3.23. Sinerga SpA
  • 17.3.24. Suzhou Oxygen Plant Co., Ltd.
  • 17.3.25. Taiyo Nippon Sanso Corporation
  • 17.3.26. Technex Group
  • 17.3.27. Universal Industrial Gases, Inc.
  • 17.3.28. Universal Ing. La. Boschi Plants Pvt. Ltd.
  • 17.3.29. Wobo Industrial Group Corp.
  • 17.3.30. Yingde Gases Group Company Limited
  • 17.3.31. Zhejiang Yuanda Air Separation Equipment Co., Ltd.

18. ResearchAI

19. ResearchStatistics

20. ResearchContacts

21. ResearchArticles

22. Appendix