![]() |
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1863508
数位循环经济市场:按产品、经营模式、技术、资源类型、应用和产业划分-2025-2032年全球预测Digital Circular Economy Market by Offering, Business Model, Technology, Resource Type, Applications, Industry Verticals - Global Forecast 2025-2032 |
||||||
※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。
预计到 2032 年,数位循环经济市场将成长至 202.7 亿美元,复合年增长率为 24.32%。
| 关键市场统计数据 | |
|---|---|
| 基准年 2024 | 35.5亿美元 |
| 预计年份:2025年 | 43.8亿美元 |
| 预测年份 2032 | 202.7亿美元 |
| 复合年增长率 (%) | 24.32% |
本文将数位循环经济定位为技术赋能、经营模式创新和材料管理三者融合的产物,它们共同重新定义了产品整个生命週期的价值创造。相关人员对资源效率和监管透明度的日益增长的期望,正促使企业重新思考产品的设计、所有权和报废处置方式,而数位化工具则提供了扩大循环经济实践规模所需的追溯性和协调性。
本执行摘要了影响企业将循环经济愿景转化为实际营运的各项交叉发展趋势、结构性变革和实用槓桿。它说明了服务和软体交付的相互作用、产品即服务 (PaaS) 和共用经济模式等不断演变的商业模式,以及人工智慧 (AI)、区块链和物联网感测器等支援技术之间的联繫。分析探讨了生物基材料、不可再生资源回收和有机废弃物处理等特定资源领域的机会,以及从逆向物流到循环报告等应用层级的优先事项。
读者可以期待一份兼顾策略与执行的平衡观点。引言部分为深入分析产业转型、2025年前美国关税主导的贸易影响、突出投资和创新重点领域的细分市场洞察以及区域机会与风险奠定了基础。该报告旨在为经营团队和投资者提供切实可行的指导,帮助他们了解如何配置资本、如何建立伙伴关係,以及如何建立或收购相关能力,以确保长期韧性和竞争优势。
在政策、采购行为和加速发展的数位化能力的共同推动下,变革正在发生,这些因素共同提高了循环经济绩效的标准。政策制定者正从愿景目标转向强制性合规机制,迫使供应商和製造商改进可追溯性和生命週期文件。随着采购组织将永续性标准内化,市场对透明供应链以及检验的再利用和回收认证的征兆日益增长。
同时,应对循环经济核心挑战的数位技术也日趋成熟。人工智慧实现了预测性维护和资源优化,有助于延长资产寿命、减少停机时间并最大限度地减少物料运输。基于区块链的可追溯性和智慧合约已从试点阶段发展成为实际营运工具,实现了原产地证明和交易效率的提升。此外,物联网和感测器网路提供了管理分散式逆向物流和基于状态的再製造所需的即时遥测数据。这些技术进步并非孤立存在;它们推动了产品即服务和共用经济等新型经营模式,并将奖励从销售量转向性能和耐用性。
此外,企业策略正转向系统思维。企业正在投资循环设计能力,加强价值链各环节的协作,并将报废管理纳入企业内部流程。资本配置日益与循环经济的优先事项相契合,企业也致力于开发能够实现产品再利用、转售和材料回收的软体层。这些因素累积作用,使得监管政策的明朗化、消费者期望的提高以及数位化的推进,形成了一个相互加速的反馈循环,为那些能够构建整合战略、运营和技术的整体方案的早期采用者创造了竞争优势。
到2025年,美国的关税政策和贸易干预措施正在重塑供应链格局和循环营运的经济模式,影响远不止于简单的成本调整。对某些原料、零件和成品征收更高的关税,促使企业寻求在重组筹资策略中提升韧性并降低成本,奖励促进国内的回收、再製造和再加工。进口关税也改变了国内再製造与国际再製造的相对吸引力,影响企业在逆向物流中心选址以及如何设计可维修产品等方面的决策。
政策环境也鼓励对循环经济能力进行投资,以降低贸易波动带来的风险。企业正在加速采用能够实现材料可追溯性和高效跨境单证的技术,从而减少合规和收款方面的摩擦。对于技术提供者而言,这种转变催生了对基于区块链的可追溯性解决方案和供应链管理平台的需求,这些平台能够使循环流程与海关制度相协调。同时,专注于供应链优化和再生製造咨询的服务供应商也发现,客户对快速重新设计其流程以最大限度降低关税影响的需求日益增长。
重点,关税可以促进高附加价值国内活动的发展。当进口产生额外成本时,诸如零件再製造、稀土回收和组件回收等活动就更具经济可行性。这种综合效应加速了近岸外包和本地化价值循环的发展,从而促进了本地化回收和维修基础设施的建设,同时也强化了对协调标准和可互通数位系统的需求,以支持跨境循环贸易。
这种细分为理解价值创造点以及扩大循环经济倡议规模所需的能力组合提供了一个实用的架构。按服务内容分析,循环经济策略咨询、供应链优化以及永续发展和环境咨询等服务与广泛的软体产品相辅相成,这些软体产品包括3D列印工具、区块链和可追溯性平台、循环设计和原型製作软体、产品生命週期管理系统、共用和处理应用程式以及供应链管理解决方案。服务驱动变革管理和流程重组,而软体则实现报告、溯源管理和生命週期调整的自动化。
从经营模式来看,循环设计实践、产品即服务模式和共用经济模式都需要不同的营运和商业基础设施。产品即服务模式,无论是付费使用制或订阅模式,都会改变收入确认的时间,并需要强大的监控和维护能力。在共用经济框架下,资产的可用性和基于状态的管理成为重中之重,这进一步增加了对预测性维护和即时追踪的需求。
从技术角度来看,人工智慧 (AI)、区块链、物联网 (IoT) 和感测器构成了三大基础技术。人工智慧有助于实现自主处理、预测性维护和资源优化,从而减少材料消费量并延长资产寿命。区块链技术提供智慧合约和可追溯性解决方案,支援溯源检验和循环贸易。物联网和感测器能够实现资产追踪和效率监控,这对于动态逆向物流和基于状态的服务模式至关重要。依资源类型细分,可以进一步展现不同的实施路径:生物基材料(例如生质塑胶和生态复合材料)所需的设计和报废基础设施与金属回收和稀土回收不同,而有机废弃物流则最适合厌氧消化和堆肥系统。应用层级的细分突出了循环经济报告和合规、废弃物管理和回收、数位化转售和再利用、资源优化和效率、逆向物流和再製造以及供应炼和材料追踪等领域的营运重点。
汽车、电子、时尚纺织等行业细分领域将重点介绍独特的应用案例和投资概况。汽车产业将着重于再製造和车辆回收,电子产业将专注于零件回收和电子废弃物回收,时尚产业将专注于环保时尚设计和纺织品回收管道。细分领域的清晰定位将有助于经营团队主管优先发展相关能力,协调合作伙伴生态系统,并选择能够显着提升产品耐用性、可重复使用性和可回收性的技术方案。
区域趋势将决定循环经济倡议在哪些地区能够最快扩大规模,以及哪些干预措施最为迫切。在美洲,监管力度和企业承诺正在推动对国内回收基础设施、再製造製造地和数位追溯系统的投资。供应链韧性的增强和投入成本的上升正在推动回收活动的近岸外包,以及製造商和逆向物流营运商之间更紧密的合作。
在欧洲、中东和非洲地区,围绕着生产者延伸责任制(EPR)和严格的回收标准的政策主导,已在多个欧洲市场催生了成熟的循环经济框架,而该地区的其他国家则正在迅速采用数位化工具来弥合监管和基础设施方面的差距。这种多样性使得区域合作和互通标准显得尤为重要,并凸显了模组化技术解决方案的必要性,这些解决方案能够根据当地的管理体制和回收系统进行客製化。
亚太地区是一个复杂的区域,大规模製造业、快速发展的消费市场和日益增长的永续性期望相互交织。先进的材料回收和纺织品回收计画正在亚太多个经济体中扩展,数位平台正在推动二手商品交易和产品即服务试点计画的规模化发展。亚太地区的现况凸显了适应性强的经营模式以及能够在基础设施成熟度各异的环境中运作的、具有成本效益的感测器和物联网部署的重要性。在地化的能力建设、政策参与以及对数位系统的定向投资对于将循环经济措施转化为所有地区的实际成果至关重要。
该领域的主要企业正在整合软体开发、服务交付和材料处理方面的策略性投资,以创造全面的价值提案。科技公司专注于支援生命週期管理、可追溯性和转售管道的模组化、可互通平台,而顾问公司和服务供应商则优先考虑实施框架和业务重组,以确保大规模应用。材料回收和处理公司正在投资自动化和先进的分离技术,以提高回收率并降低污染成本。
成功企业的通用模式是建立跨产业伙伴关係关係,整合设计专长、物流能力和数位基础设施。这些合作涉及製造商、逆向物流营运商、回收专家和软体供应商,通用致力于制定通用标准和商业性协议,以减少摩擦并促进循环流动。另一个关键因素是将永续性指标整合到核心绩效仪錶板中,使高阶主管能够将循环关键绩效指标与财务和营运指标一起管理。
那些最有效地掌握循环经济商机的公司往往会优先考虑试点推广路径,利用有针对性的试点计画来检验经营模式假设、营运流程以及客户对新型所有权模式的接受度。他们还会投资于能够整合永续发展、资料科学和供应链工程的人才,将技术能力转化为能够引起采购部门和最终用户共鸣的商业性提案。
产业领导者应采取分阶段、能力主导的方式,在管控商业风险的同时加速循环转型。他们可以先将循环设计原则融入产品开发流程,降低材料复杂性,提升产品的可维修性和可回收性。同时,他们可以在相关产品线中评估产品即服务和共用经济模式的可行性,并在能够可靠地提供生命週期可视性和维护服务的领域中试行付费使用制付费和订阅模式。
增加对可互通数位平台的投资,这些平台整合了资产追踪、状态监控和溯源检验。优先考虑在各种运作环境中部署经济高效且扩充性的感测器和物联网架构,并结合专注于预测性维护和资源最佳化的AI模型。选择性地采用基于区块链的可追溯性技术,以支援需要不可篡改且可由相关人员共用的帐本的溯源和合规性要求。
实现回收和再製造製造地多元化,以增强区域韧性,尤其是在应对关税带来的贸易风险方面。在整个价值链上建立伙伴关係,将报废管理内部化,并投资建设稀土元素和金属等关键资源的在地化加工能力。最后,使采购政策与认可循环经济绩效的企业奖励机制一致,将循环经济关键绩效指标纳入经营团队指标,并建立透明的报告机制,以促进持续改善和相关人员的信任。
本调查方法结合了定性和定量方法,以确保研究结果的可靠性和可重复性。主要研究包括对製造业、零售业和服务业的高阶主管以及材料回收、物流和软体开发领域的从业人员进行结构化访谈。这些访谈揭示了营运现状、投资重点以及循环倡议规模化推广的障碍。次要研究包括对监管文件、技术白皮书、行业标准和上市公司可持续发展报告的全面审查,以获得检验的、具有背景意义的研究结果。
我们运用分析框架,将主题研究结果转化为可操作的细分层面洞察。产品层面的分析评估了服务和软体在推动使用者采纳方面的相互作用。经营模式评估比较了循环设计、产品到服务和共用经济模式的商业性可行性和营运要求。技术评估着重于人工智慧、区块链和物联网的采纳成熟度和整合路径。资源类型评估检验了生医材料、不可再生资源回收和有机废弃物处理的技术和基础设施要求,而应用层级优先考虑了逆向物流和循环报告等营运案例。
透过访谈、个案研究和政策分析的三角验证,确保结论既体现了策略意图,又兼顾了现实限制。在缺乏公开数据的情况下,我们采用有针对性的专家咨询和情境建模方法来验证假设并对建议的措施进行压力测试。品管措施包括资深研究人员的同侪检验以及与行业相关人员的反覆检验,以确保研究结果的相关性和实用性。
研究结果表明,同步推进数位化和循环经济对于实现真正的资源效率和韧性至关重要。超越孤立的试点项目,整合设计、所有权模式和数位化基础的组织将能够创造长期价值,同时降低供应链波动和监管风险。人工智慧、区块链和物联网的整合为基于状态的服务、认证的次市场和优化的资源流动提供了营运基础,而这些正是循环商业模式的基石。
成功取决于切实可行的策略,例如优先考虑投资、共用可互通的技术,以及建立跨部门伙伴关係以分担风险并扩大物流基础设施规模。政策、基础设施和製造地的区域差异将继续影响循环经济模式最有效的实施地点和方式,这需要采取适应性方法和本地能力建设。最终,最具韧性的组织将是那些将循环经济视为核心商业策略而非仅仅作为合规活动,并将可衡量的循环经济关键绩效指标纳入管治和资本配置决策,以确保持续进步的组织。
The Digital Circular Economy Market is projected to grow by USD 20.27 billion at a CAGR of 24.32% by 2032.
| KEY MARKET STATISTICS | |
|---|---|
| Base Year [2024] | USD 3.55 billion |
| Estimated Year [2025] | USD 4.38 billion |
| Forecast Year [2032] | USD 20.27 billion |
| CAGR (%) | 24.32% |
The introduction frames the digital circular economy as the convergence of technological enablement, business model innovation, and material stewardship that together redefine value creation across product lifecycles. Growing stakeholder expectations for resource efficiency and regulatory clarity are driving enterprises to reimagine design, ownership, and end-of-life pathways, while digital tools provide the traceability and orchestration necessary to scale circular practices.
This executive summary synthesizes cross-cutting developments, structural shifts, and practical levers that influence how companies convert circular ambition into operational reality. It highlights the interplay between services and software offerings, evolving commercial models such as product-as-a-service and shared economy arrangements, and the technologies underpinning this transformation, including artificial intelligence, blockchain, and IoT sensors. The analysis also considers resource-specific opportunities across biomaterials, non-renewable recovery, and organic waste processing as well as application-level priorities from reverse logistics to circular reporting.
Readers should expect a balanced view that connects strategy to implementation: the introduction sets the stage for deeper sections on landscape transformations, tariff-driven trade effects in the United States through 2025, segmentation-level insights that reveal where investment and innovation are concentrating, and regionally differentiated opportunities and risks. The purpose is to equip executives and investors with an actionable understanding of where to allocate capital, how to structure partnerships, and which capabilities to build or buy to secure long-term resilience and competitive advantage.
The landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by policy, procurement behavior, and accelerating digital capabilities that are collectively raising the bar for circular performance. Policymakers are moving from aspirational targets toward enforceable compliance mechanisms, which in turn force suppliers and manufacturers to improve traceability and lifecycle documentation. As procurement organizations internalize sustainability criteria, demand signals are emerging for transparent supply chains and verified reuse or recycling credentials.
At the same time, digital technologies are maturing to address core circular challenges. Artificial intelligence enables predictive maintenance and resource optimization that extend asset life, reduce downtime, and minimize material throughput. Blockchain-based traceability and smart contracts are evolving from pilot stages into operational tools for provenance and transactional efficiency, while IoT and sensor networks provide the real-time telemetry necessary to manage distributed reverse logistics and condition-based remanufacturing. These technological advances are not isolated; they amplify new business models such as product-as-a-service and shared economy arrangements, which reorient incentives away from unit sales toward performance and durability.
Furthermore, corporate strategy is shifting toward systems thinking: companies are investing in circular design capabilities and partnering across value chains to internalize end-of-life management. Capital allocation is increasingly aligned with circular priorities, with venture activity targeting software layers that enable reuse, resale, and materials recovery. The cumulative effect is a feedback loop where regulatory clarity, buyer expectations, and digital enablement accelerate each other, creating windows of competitive advantage for early adopters who can integrate strategy, operations, and technology into coherent programs.
Tariff policy and trade interventions in the United States through 2025 are reshaping supply chain calculus and the economics of circular operations in ways that extend beyond simple cost adjustments. Increased duties on specific categories of raw materials, components, and finished goods incentivize greater domestic recovery, refurbishment, and remanufacturing, as organizations seek resilience and cost mitigation within reconfigured sourcing strategies. Import tariffs also alter the relative attractiveness of onshore versus offshore remanufacturing, influencing decisions about where to centralize reverse-logistics hubs and how to design repairable products.
The policy environment is also stimulating investments in circular capabilities that reduce exposure to trade volatility. Companies are accelerating adoption of technologies that enable materials traceability and efficient cross-border documentation, thereby reducing friction associated with compliance and reclamation. For technology providers, this shift creates demand for blockchain-based traceability solutions and supply chain management platforms that can reconcile tariff regimes with circular flows. Meanwhile, service providers that specialize in supply chain optimization and remanufacturing advisory are seeing increased interest from clients that require rapid redesign of flows to minimize tariff impacts.
Importantly, tariffs can act as a catalyst for higher-value domestic activity: parts remanufacturing, rare earth recycling, and component recovery become more economically viable when imports carry additional costs. The combined effect is an acceleration of nearshoring and regionalized value loops that favor localized infrastructure for recycling and refurbishment, while also raising the urgency for harmonized standards and interoperable digital systems to support cross-border circular transactions.
Segmentation provides a practical framework for understanding where value is created and which capability sets are required to scale circular initiatives. When examined by offering, services such as circular economy strategy consulting, supply chain optimization, and sustainability and environmental consulting are complementary to a broad suite of software products that include 3D printing tools, blockchain and traceability platforms, circular design and prototyping software, product lifecycle management systems, sharing and machining applications, and supply chain management solutions. Together, services drive change management and process redesign while software automates reporting, provenance, and lifecycle orchestration.
Looking at business models reveals that circular design practices, product-as-a-service arrangements, and shared economy models each demand different operational and commercial infrastructures. Product-as-a-service deployments, whether through pay-per-use or subscription structures, shift revenue recognition and require robust monitoring and maintenance capabilities. Shared economy frameworks prioritize asset availability and condition-based management, which amplifies the need for predictive maintenance and real-time tracking.
From a technology perspective, artificial intelligence, blockchain, and IoT and sensors form the triad of enablers. AI facilitates autonomous processing, predictive maintenance, and resource optimization that lower material throughput and extend asset life. Blockchain technology provides smart contracts and traceability solutions that validate provenance and support circular transactions. IoT and sensors deliver asset tracking and efficiency monitoring necessary for dynamic reverse logistics and condition-based service models. Resource-type segmentation further demonstrates differentiated implementation pathways: biomaterials such as bioplastics and eco-composites require design and end-of-life infrastructure distinct from metals recovery and rare earth recycling, while organic waste streams are best served by anaerobic digestion and composting systems. Application-level segmentation highlights operational priorities across circular economy reporting and compliance, waste management and recycling, digital resale and reuse, resource optimization and efficiency, reverse logistics and remanufacturing, and supply chain and materials tracking.
Industry verticals such as automotive, electronics, and fashion and textiles emphasize unique use cases and investment profiles. Automotive opportunities focus on parts remanufacturing and vehicle recycling, electronics prioritize component recovery and e-waste recycling, and fashion converges around eco-fashion design and textile recycling pathways. Segment-level clarity allows executives to prioritize capability development, align partner ecosystems, and select technology stacks that deliver measurable improvements in durability, reuse, and recyclability.
Regional dynamics shape where circular initiatives can scale fastest and which interventions are most urgent. In the Americas, regulatory momentum and corporate commitments are driving investments in domestic recycling infrastructure, remanufacturing hubs, and digital traceability systems. Supply chain resilience agendas and rising input costs are incentivizing nearshoring of recovery activities and closer coordination between manufacturers and reverse logistics providers.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, policy leadership on extended producer responsibility and stringent recycling standards has fostered mature circular frameworks in several European markets, while other countries in the region are rapidly adopting digital tools to bridge regulatory and infrastructure gaps. This diversity makes regional partnerships and interoperable standards particularly valuable, and it emphasizes the need for modular technology solutions that can be tailored to local regulatory regimes and collection systems.
Asia-Pacific presents a complex mix of large-scale manufacturing, rapidly evolving consumer markets, and growing sustainability expectations. Several economies in this region are scaling advanced materials recovery and textile recycling initiatives, while digital platforms are enabling secondhand commerce and product-as-a-service pilots at scale. The regional picture underscores the importance of adaptable business models and cost-effective sensor and IoT deployments that can operate across varying levels of infrastructure maturity. Across all regions, localized capability building, policy engagement, and targeted investment in digital systems are critical to translating circular ambition into concrete outcomes.
Leading companies in this space are aligning strategic investments across software development, service delivery, and materials processing to create integrated value propositions. Technology firms are focusing on modular, interoperable platforms that can support lifecycle management, traceability, and resale channels, while consultancies and service providers are emphasizing implementation frameworks and operational redesign to ensure adoption at scale. Material recovery and processing firms are investing in automation and advanced separation techniques to increase yields and reduce contamination costs.
A common pattern among successful organizations is the formation of cross-sector partnerships that combine design expertise, logistics capabilities, and digital enablers. These collaborations often include manufacturers, reverse logistics operators, recycling specialists, and software providers working toward shared standards and commercial arrangements that reduce friction and scale circular flows. Another differentiator is the integration of sustainability metrics into core performance dashboards, enabling executives to manage circular KPIs alongside financial and operational indicators.
Companies that are most effective at capturing circular opportunities tend to prioritize pilot-to-scale pathways, using targeted trials to validate business model assumptions, operational workflows, and customer willingness to adopt new ownership models. They also invest in talent that bridges sustainability, data science, and supply chain engineering, which allows them to translate technical capabilities into commercial offers that resonate with procurement and end customers alike.
Industry leaders should adopt a phased, capability-driven approach to accelerate circular transformation while controlling commercial risk. Begin by embedding circular design principles into product development processes to reduce material complexity and facilitate repairability and recyclability. Concurrently, assess the viability of product-as-a-service and shared economy models for relevant product lines, piloting pay-per-use or subscription structures where lifecycle visibility and maintenance services can be reliably delivered.
Invest in interoperable digital platforms that combine asset tracking, condition monitoring, and provenance verification. Prioritize sensor deployments and IoT architectures that are cost-effective and scalable across diverse operational contexts, and combine them with AI models focused on predictive maintenance and resource optimization. Implement blockchain-based traceability selectively to support provenance and compliance needs where multiple parties require a shared, immutable ledger.
Strengthen regional resilience by diversifying recovery and remanufacturing footprints, particularly in response to tariff-induced trade risks. Build partnerships across the value chain to internalize end-of-life management and invest in localized processing capacity for critical resources such as rare earth elements and metals. Finally, align corporate incentives and procurement policies to reward circular outcomes, integrate circular KPIs into executive scorecards, and commit to transparent reporting that drives continuous improvement and stakeholder trust.
The research methodology integrates qualitative and quantitative approaches to ensure robust, reproducible insights. Primary research included structured interviews with senior executives across manufacturing, retail, and services sectors, along with practitioners in material recovery, logistics, and software development. These discussions were designed to surface operational realities, investment priorities, and barriers to scaling circular initiatives. Secondary research encompassed a comprehensive review of regulatory texts, technology whitepapers, industry standards, and publicly available corporate sustainability disclosures to ground findings in verifiable context.
Analytical frameworks were applied to translate thematic findings into actionable segmentation-level insights. Offering-level analysis assessed the interplay between services and software in driving adoption, business model evaluation compared commercial viability and operational requirements for circular design, product-as-a-service, and shared economy models, and technology assessment focused on deployment maturity and integration pathways for AI, blockchain, and IoT. Resource-type evaluations examined technological and infrastructural needs for biomaterials, non-renewable recovery, and organic waste processing, while application-level workstreams prioritized operational use cases such as reverse logistics and circular reporting.
Triangulation between interviews, case studies, and policy analysis ensured that conclusions reflect both strategic intent and real-world constraints. Where gaps in public data existed, targeted expert elicitation and scenario-based modeling were used to validate assumptions and stress-test recommended actions. Quality control measures included peer review by senior researchers and iterative validation with industry participants to ensure relevance and practicality of the findings.
The conclusion synthesizes the imperative that digitalization and circularity must be pursued in tandem to achieve meaningful resource efficiency and resilience. Organizations that move beyond isolated pilots to integrate design, ownership models, and digital enablers position themselves to capture long-term value while reducing exposure to supply chain volatility and regulatory risk. The convergence of AI, blockchain, and IoT provides the operational backbone for condition-based services, authenticated secondary markets, and optimized resource flows that underpin circular business cases.
Success will depend on pragmatic strategies that sequence investments, prioritize interoperable technologies, and cultivate cross-sector partnerships to share risk and scale logistics infrastructure. Regional nuances in policy, infrastructure, and manufacturing footprint will continue to shape where and how circular models can be implemented most effectively, thus requiring adaptive approaches and local capacity building. Ultimately, the most resilient organizations will be those that treat circularity as a core commercial strategy rather than a compliance exercise, embedding measurable circular KPIs into governance and capital allocation decisions to ensure continuous progress.